Is Normal? Consistency Check is cancelled when File is Restored

Is it normal operation for an on-going Consistency Check to be canceled by the system when a file restore is performed on the same volume?
This happens in my environment, however I haven't found any documentation supporting it.

Synchronization jobs are definitely canceled during a restore, so it would not surprise me at all that a consistency check would also be canceled. You can get around this by restoring the data to another location (perhaps the DPM server itself) and then
manually copying the data to the target server. More work, I know, but it will not interrupt a consistency check.

Similar Messages

Consistency check error in sender file content conversion

Dear Experts,
I am trying one simple File to File scenario in which i have only fields 1>salesorder_number 2>Description
I created a txt file with line items "100,crudeoil" with file name as salesorder.txt
In the sender file adapter i have configured the file convertion paramenters as follows:
Document name : mt_salesorder_sender
Document namespace : http://se.com.sa/sec-sa-qax "Namespace of message type
Recordset Structure : document,*
document.endSeparator : 'nl'
document.fieldSeparator: ,
document.fieldNames : salesorder_number,Description
So after this if i run the scenario In file adapter i am getting the error like "Conversion initialization failed: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: Error(s) in XML conversion parameters found: Parameter 'document.fieldFixedLengths' or 'document.fieldSeparator' is missing Consistency check: no. of arguments in 'document.fieldFixedLength' does not match 'document.fieldNames' (0 <> 2) "
Please let me know where i am going wrong.
Regards,
Santhosh

Hi,
please maintain the order as
Recordset Structure : document,*
document.fieldNames : salesorder_number,Description
document.fieldSeparator: ,
document.endSeparator : 'nl'
Rgds
joel

Automating global consistency check

Hi,
Could anyone please share knowledge on how to automate rpd global consistency check and creating output file containing errors and warnings of rpd.
Regards,
Varun

Hi varun,
to automate rpd global consistency checkNo,there is no automate for consistency check.Anyways why you want to automate.Its a one step process just clicking global consistency check.
By,
Kranthi.

Recovery points and consistency checks are failing for one disk on file server. Access is denied (0x80070005)

Good day! I've built a new DPM 2012 R2 server and migrated or re-created jobs from my older 2012 SP1 DPM servers as trying to upgrade them was not working out. The DPM R2 server is running great besides this one issue. The problem is with a file
and print server at a remote office. Since it has around 750 GB of user data on it I chose to do manual replica creation on the data disk, (E:) but created the C:\ drive replica normally, over the WAN. The manual replica creation was successful, and the initial
consistency check and recovery point creation worked as expected, however, since then it will not create another RP or run a CC on the E:\ drive. Recovery points on the C:\ drive are being created properly. When I try to run a CC I get this error: "An
unexpected error occurred while the job was running. (ID 104 Details: Access is denied (0x80070005))" I've tried to drop protection on the two directories of the E:\ drive (retaining data) and re-create, but that didn't help. I've even done a recovery
from the initial RP to verify that it was created properly, and that worked as well.

Hi,
Access Denied error is usually caused by Antivirus software. Please disable real time scanning on the DPM Server for DPMRA process.
928840 You receive job status failure messages in Data Protection Manager
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;928840
For DPM 2012 the path has changed.
To resolve this problem, configure the antivirus program to exclude real-time monitoring of the Dpmra.exe program on the Data Protection Manager server. By default, the Dpmra.exe file is located in the following folder:
%ProgramFiles%\Microsoft System Center 2012\DPM\DPM\Bin
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. Regards, Mike J. [MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

When do consistency check for a sharepoint content databse : that RBSID in table AllDocStreams registered with RBS is invalid

Hi
In my sharepont farm a web application configured with RBS and its working fine,
when users upload pdfs the no of files are increased in RBS file system folder,
but when i run Consistency check before running RBS maintainer for cleaning garbage dta for this web applications content database , i faced below issue , its saying
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Remote Blob Storage 10.50\Maintainer>Microsoft.Da
ta.SqlRemoteBlobs.Maintainer.exe -ConnectionStringName RBS_2 -Operation Consiste
ncyCheck -ConsistencyCheckMode c
Starting Maintainer tasks.
Starting RBS consistency check with check only.
The column <RbsId> in table <dbo.AllDocStreams>
registered with RBS is invalid.
and also when i repair consistency checks its saying same message, that RBSID in table AllDocStreams registered with RBS is invalid.
and also its recommended to check consistency before cleaning garbage data from content database
adil

http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/e9bda580-b9e7-48c5-b18c-485e016677a1/rbs-maintainer-not-cleanup-files-in-file-system-sharepoint-2010?forum=sharepointadminprevious
The GC of RBS maintainer just purges BLOBs in SQL Server. And FILESTREAM GC is needed to purge the files in file system.
http://www.sqlskills.com/BLOGS/PAUL/post/FILESTREAM-garbage-collection.aspx : (FILESTREAM GC)... runs as part of the database checkpoint
process. This is what causes some confusion - an old FILESTREAM file will not be removed until after it is no longer needed AND a checkpoint runs.
Yes, In Simple recovery mode, just run SQL statement:
CHECKPOINT;
In Full recovery mode, two transaction log with CHECKPOINT are needed. Detail in the link above.
http://blog.avtex.com/2011/05/16/remote-blob-store-rbs-and-sharepoint-2010-part-2/
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

Why does RCS prompt me to check out the .XPJ file when I open RoboHelp HTML?

We just upgraded from X3 to X5 and began using RoboSource
Control. We currently have a dedicated server machine and 1 client
machine (we'll be adding 3 more client machines once I resolve all
issues with this one). I have working folders set up on each
machine so I can open the Help projects with RoboHelp HTML.
The issue here is that I often receive the following prompt
in a dialog box when I open a Help project in RH HTML:
"To add version control information to this project, the
files in the list below need to be checked out from version
control. Do you want to check out these files?" (The only file
listed is the .XPJ file.)
I only seem to receive this message after I have opened that
particular Help project on the other PC. E.g., I open Help project
A on the Server. If I close it, I can re-open the Help project on
that machine multiple times without receiving the message. However,
if I then open Help project A on the client machine, I'll get the
prompt to check out the XPJ file. If I check it out, I can then
re-open the Help project on that machine multiple times without
receiving the message. Of course, if check in the XPJ file from the
client machine, I'll get the prompt on the Server machine to check
it out the next time I go to open it up from there.
Thoughts?

Dirk,
Thanks for the suggestions. I was prompted to check out the
XPJ for one of our Help projects this morning. I clicked
No (to NOT check out the XPJ file from the database), then
selected the
File Status tab, right-clicked on the XPJ file, selected
Show Differences... and discovered that the XPJ file in the
database had the following version control related text, whereas
the XPJ file in the working folder on my SERVER machine did not
(the working folder copy on my CLIENT machine matched the file in
the database):
Note: This code appears between a <miscproperties> line
and a <CompileOptions> line (both XPJ files had these two
lines).

RSC says I have files checked out, but when I try to check them in it says they're not checked out

We are using RSC 3 to control RH7 projects. At the moment RSC says I have hundres of files checked out, but when I try to check them in it says they're not checked out. And then it says "No files were found to CheckIn." What could be causing this?
I tried refreshing and rebooting my (client) PC, and it didn't help.
Thanks.

I am no pro at this product but when you look in source control, who does it say has those files checked out. Does that user match the credentials that you use to connect to source control. The only reason I ask this is, when I first set this up for my Publishers, I used the default admin account to connect to RSC. Then I created accounts for them and went to their workstations to change credentials. I changed the credentials but they had checked out some docs before that and could not check them back in because they were still checked out as admin. Had to change it back, have them check projects back in and then switch credentials. Hope this helps.

" -- Failed consistency check for this level" when doing Estimate Levels

Hello again,
When you run "Estimate Levels" and you get "<-- Failed consistency check for this level"
What does it really mean? Can this break, because of NULL values in logical keys? Or perhaps anything else? Thanks
Thanks

Thomas,
since you've seen this before....did you have a problem doing "Estimate Levels" when you had measures in the hierarchy (usually they get there when you select a level for measure in its settings). I suspect the problem is in the measure - using FILTER function which references the dimension.
Thanks

Aperture freezes when performing a "Consistency Check"

Hi everyone,
today I have updated my Aperture 1.x library to a brand new Aperture 2.1 one.
Unfortunately the conversion process freezed (it looked like it was finished because the little conversion window had disappeared) and, after waiting a very long time, i forced-quit Aperture.
Everything seems to be fine (all the pictures are there...) but I still don't feel very safe.
So I decided to rebuild the library and perform a consistency check: the former went fine while the latter freezes Aperture (I have waited 1+ hour).
Is that a bug or am I doing something wrong?
Thank you.

I apologize for disturbing.
I did a fourth "Consistency Check" and it went fine.
Thank you!

Secondary DPM (2012 R2) Issues: synchronising too much data from Primary DPM, persistant consistancy checks, and no dedup support!

I have a Primary DPM server that is protecting various File servers and a Exchange DAG. Everything is working as it should on this server, but I am experiencing constant issues on the secondary DPM protecting these same data sources.
On the primary, two Protection Groups in particular are set up to protect two different volumes on the same file server. Volume D:\ is 46TB in size, with a deduplicated file size of 22TB (actual 39TB) whilst Volume E:\ is 25 TB in size, with a deduplicated
file size of 2.5TB (actual 5.5TB).
Issue 1:
As expected Volume D: was initially replicated to the secondary DPM server at its undeduplicated size ( 39TB), as was Volume E:\ with initial replication to the secondary of 5.5 TB. So when is Microsoft going to support dedup on a secondary DPM ? It
seems daft to support dedup on the Primary DPM which is always more likely to be close to the original datasources on the LAN and not on the secondary DPM which is most likely to be placed offsite on a WAN !
Issue 2:
I have a big issue with the subsequent Synchronizations on the secondary server for E: which seems to transfer almost the full 5.5 TB every day ( I have it set to sync every 24hrs) - although the data is fairly static (i.e.unchanging) on that volume. On
one occasion a Sync continued for over 48 hours for this volume and had transferred over 20GB (according to the DPM console) , until I manually cancelled the job - how is that possible on a volume with only 5.5 TB (UN-deduplicated) ?? What is going on here
- has anyone any ideas?
Issue 3:
Another File server I am protecting on both the Primary & Secondary DPM server - always fails over to a consistency check on the secondary server - usually due to the fact it cannot access a particular file which results in an inconsistent replica .
However the Sync (and subsequent restore point) on the primary DPM server from the original datasource is always completes without any issues. Again, has anyone any clues ?
I do get the impression that the whole Secondary DPM thing is not quite robust enough. I can only assume that as the Primary seems to protect the original datasources ok, that the issue is with the secondary reading the information on the primary DPM.

I tried changing the time of the synchronization, but that didn't help.
Meanwhile, I was working on another unrelated case with Microsoft and so I didn't want to have a second case open at the same time. So I waited for some weeks with no change on this problem. Then, about a day or two before I was finally going to call Microsoft
to open a case (months after the problem had started), the problem suddenly resolved itself, with no input from me! So I don't really know if it was time that fixed it eventually or what. Sorry I can't be of more help.
Rob

Windows Server 2012 - Backup failing with Exchange - The application will not be available for recovery from this backup. the consistency check failed

Hi
We have a Windows 2012 server with Exchange 2013, all is working fine except now i am getting issues with the backup.
'Exchange - The application will not be available for recovery from this backup. the consistency check failed for the component Microsoft Exchange Server'
I have checked the database all is fine, i have created a new db and move all mailbox;s over and then removed the old db, i have enabled circular logging and then disabled it, it seems no matter what i do i cannot get a full backup!
i did have to restore the server once and the backups still worked for about 4 days after that and then stopped, i have also tried to remove and re add the backup role!
i am stumped, any advice would be great!

Hi
Ok, i created a test db and tried to back it up right away, it failed, i did not add any mailbox's to it either. i got quite a few events in the windows logs, as well as the same event above i got the following:
Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchangeRepl
Date: 21/01/2013 10:16:30
Event ID: 2038
Task Category: Exchange VSS Writer
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: NERDS-DC01.nerds.local
Description:
Microsoft Exchange VSS Writer backup failed. No log files were truncated. Instance 75754d0d-8dfe-4909-8beb-5a4f824254a9. Database 4843b37c-7b3c-42b2-8b57-1393615c2c15.
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="MSExchangeRepl" />
<EventID Qualifiers="32772">2038</EventID>
<Level>3</Level>
<Task>2</Task>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-01-21T10:16:30.000000000Z" />
<EventRecordID>261645</EventRecordID>
<Channel>Application</Channel>
<Computer>NERDS-DC01.nerds.local</Computer>
<Security />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>75754d0d-8dfe-4909-8beb-5a4f824254a9</Data>
<Data>4843b37c-7b3c-42b2-8b57-1393615c2c15</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
AND
Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchangeRepl
Date: 21/01/2013 10:16:30
Event ID: 2038
Task Category: Exchange VSS Writer
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: NERDS-DC01.nerds.local
Description:
Microsoft Exchange VSS Writer backup failed. No log files were truncated. Instance 75754d0d-8dfe-4909-8beb-5a4f824254a9. Database db5826f3-1029-4219-ad80-441a0e94537a.
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="MSExchangeRepl" />
<EventID Qualifiers="32772">2038</EventID>
<Level>3</Level>
<Task>2</Task>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-01-21T10:16:30.000000000Z" />
<EventRecordID>261646</EventRecordID>
<Channel>Application</Channel>
<Computer>NERDS-DC01.nerds.local</Computer>
<Security />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>75754d0d-8dfe-4909-8beb-5a4f824254a9</Data>
<Data>db5826f3-1029-4219-ad80-441a0e94537a</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
and
Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchangeRepl
Date: 21/01/2013 10:16:30
Event ID: 2034
Task Category: Exchange VSS Writer
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: NERDS-DC01.nerds.local
Description:
The Microsoft Exchange Replication service VSS Writer (Instance 75754d0d-8dfe-4909-8beb-5a4f824254a9) failed with error FFFFFFFC when processing the backup completion event.
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="MSExchangeRepl" />
<EventID Qualifiers="49156">2034</EventID>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>2</Task>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-01-21T10:16:30.000000000Z" />
<EventRecordID>261649</EventRecordID>
<Channel>Application</Channel>
<Computer>NERDS-DC01.nerds.local</Computer>
<Security />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>75754d0d-8dfe-4909-8beb-5a4f824254a9</Data>
<Data>FFFFFFFC</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
and
Log Name: Application
Source: SPP
Date: 21/01/2013 10:16:30
Event ID: 16389
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: NERDS-DC01.nerds.local
Description:
Writer Microsoft Exchange Writer experienced retryable error during shadow copy creation. Retrying... More info: .
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="SPP" />
<EventID Qualifiers="0">16389</EventID>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>0</Task>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-01-21T10:16:30.000000000Z" />
<EventRecordID>261650</EventRecordID>
<Channel>Application</Channel>
<Computer>NERDS-DC01.nerds.local</Computer>
<Security />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>Microsoft Exchange Writer</Data>
<Data>
</Data>
<Data>The writer experienced a transient error. If the backup process is retried, the error may not reoccur. (0x800423F3)</Data>
<Data>
</Data>
<Binary>00000000A5120000981200000000000042BEB7C511CAC619E59C92030000000000000000</Binary>
</EventData>
</Event>

ERROR consistency check in recordset structure validation

Hi,
I have a file that has the format below. The file is managed with the below content conversion parameters. However, it's not working and the error message that i get is "Conversion of file content to XML failed at position 0: java.lang.Exception: ERROR consistency check in recordset structure validation (line no. 7: missing structure(s) in last recordset". Any idea, what when wrong? Thanks.
Message Type defined:
FileHeader            (occurrence = 1)
ARPostingRecord    (occurrence = 1 to unbounded)
    RecordHeader       (occurrence = 1 to unbounded)
    RecordDetail          (occurrence = 1 to unbounded)
Source file looks like this:
01 Field1 Field2...Field-n
H Field1 Field2...Field-n
L Field1 Field2...Field-n
L Field1 Field2...Field-n
H Field1 Field2...Field-n
L Field1 Field2...Field-n
L Field1 Field2...Field-n
where:
01 is the keyfieldvalue for FileHeader
H is the keyfieldvalue for RecordHeader
L is the keyfieldvalue for RecordDetail
Specified parameters:
FileHeader.fieldSeparator
FileHeader.endSeparator
FileHeader.fieldNames
FileHeader.keyFieldValue
RecordHeader.fieldSeparator
RecordHeader.endSeparator
RecordHeader.fieldNames
RecordHeader.keyFieldValue
RecordHeader.missingLastFields
RecordHeader.keepIncompleteFields
RecordDetail.fieldSeparator
RecordDetail.endSeparator
RecordDetail.fieldNames
RecordDetail.keyFieldValue
RecordDetail.missingLastFields
RecordDetail.keepIncompleteFields
ignoreRecordsetName
Recordset Name:
ARPostingRecord
Recordset Structure:
FileHeader,1,RecordHeader,1000000,RecordDetail,1000000

>ERROR consistency check in recordset structure validation (line no. 7: missing structure(s) in last recordset". Any idea, what when wrong?
When you are not sure about number of records for RecordHeader and RecordDetail, Please specify wildchar character. Dont give max numbers. The errors says expecting the specified number for recordset and since it is missing gives errror.

Fileserver consistency checks failing 0x809909B0

I have a file server with approx. 1.7TB of files which became inconsistent on the 8<sup>th</sup> of November, and has been unable to complete a consistency check since then.
Consistency checks fail with the error:
The protection agent on <server> was temporarily unable to respond because it was in an unexpected state. (ID 60 Details: Internal error code: 0x809909B0)
I have removed and re-added the server, including deleting the protected data from DPM disk, and reinstalled the DPM agent on the file server, but I still receive the above error when consistency checking.
DPM is System Center 2012 R2 v4.2.1254.0 on Windows Server 2012 R2.
The file server is running Windows Server 2012 R2 also.
KB2919355 is installed on both systems.
I did have Dedup running on the file server, but have un-deduped the drive as part of troubleshooting this issue.
Other servers backed up by this DPM server are being backed up fine, including a HyperV cluster, 2 exchange servers and 2 sharepoint farms.
There are a large number of these errors in the DPMRA log around the time the job fails:
5288       4F48
11/28     22:49:56.601
29
radefaultsubtask.cpp(355)
[00000000013EE9D0]       50C1500F-0353-4D2A-8188-FC03612E2503
WARNING
Failed: Hr: = [0x809909b0] : CRADefaultSubTask: WorkitemID does not exist, {EB6F4726-E5C5-4958-B034-542518E5A931}
5288       4F48
11/28     22:49:56.601
05
defaultsubtask.cpp(546)
[00000000013EE9D0]       50C1500F-0353-4D2A-8188-FC03612E2503
WARNING
Failed: Hr: = [0x809909b0] : Encountered Failure: : lVal : CommandReceivedSpecific(pCommand, pOvl)
5288       4F48
11/28     22:49:56.601
05
defaultsubtask.cpp(751)
[00000000013EE9D0]       50C1500F-0353-4D2A-8188-FC03612E2503
WARNING
Failed: Hr: = [0x809909b0] : Encountered Failure: : lVal : CommandReceived(pAgentOvl)
5288       4F48
11/28     22:50:03.635
03
runtime.cpp(1376)
[00000000012F4850]       50C1500F-0353-4D2A-8188-FC03612E2503
FATAL   Subtask failure, sending status response XML=[<?xml version="1.0"?>
5288       4F48
11/28     22:50:03.635
03
runtime.cpp(1376)
[00000000012F4850]       50C1500F-0353-4D2A-8188-FC03612E2503
FATAL   <Status xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/dls/StatusMessages.xsd" StatusCode="-2137454160" Reason="Error" CommandID="RACancelAllSubTasks" CommandInstanceID="8a514c9b-6a62-42b4-a03b-0f938e3f20cc"
GuidWorkItem="eb6f4726-e5c5-4958-b034-542518e5a931" TETaskInstanceID="50c1500f-0353-4d2a-8188-fc03612e2503"><ErrorInfo xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/dls/GenericAgentStatus.xsd" ErrorCode="536872913"
DetailedCode="-2137454160" DetailedSource="2"><Parameter Name="AgentTargetServer" Value="DPM01.domain.com"/></ErrorInfo></Status>
5288       4F48
11/28     22:50:03.635
03
runtime.cpp(1376)
[00000000012F4850]       50C1500F-0353-4D2A-8188-FC03612E2503
FATAL   ]
I have also tried the steps in this article with no change:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/107bdce0-e13c-427a-9341-07d4b558f007/dpmra-crashing-after-update-to-dpm-2012-r2-ur2
Currently I have reduced the amount of shares being backed up to just ~400gb of data and I have it in a consistent state, but I need to get the remainder of the data backed up, and I can’t be in a situation where if it becomes inconsistent it can’t run a
successful consistency check again.

Hi,
If you want to pursue this immediately, you can visit the following web site to open a support incident. The charge to your CC will not be processed until your case is resolved and closed, if it's a code defect in the DPM then we wave all charges.
http://support.microsoft.com/select/Default.aspx?target=assistance
In the Quick product finder, enter:System Center 2012 R2 - then select System Center 2012 R2 Data Protection Manager
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. Regards, Mike J. [MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

Consistency check error 38011: Logical tables from multiple subject areas..

I received multiple 38011 errors when performing a consistency check after merging repositories:
For example:
Logical tables from multiple subject areas associated, OHRP and Enterprise Warehouse
(OHRP and Enterprise Warehouse refer to different business models)
I'm really not sure what this means, and Metalink and Google aren't turning up anything.
Thoughts?
-John

John,
Does it say anything about Assertion Failure? Also, this is straight up from help regarding import (through file menu) "Use this option when the objects you import are unrelated to objects already in the repository such as when the business model and physical layer objects do not exist. If an object of the same name and type exists, the import process overwrites the existing object with the new object. When you import objects from one repository into another, the repository from which you are importing must be consistent."
Sometimes Merge does bring unexpected (and unwanted results) - especially if there're presentation aliases, duplicate business models, or naming conflicts. If it's not too late, I suggest you use Import,rather than Merge, also, preferably starting with a new RPD file. This would enable you to bring items piece-by-piece and hopefully would allow you to isolate the problem.
Also, depending on the size - it's sometimes preferable to just reproduce missing part(s). I hope this is helpful.
Also, I forgot to say - the Import is deprecated and not supported. They suggest you use Project Extract and Merge. If Merge isn't working out for you and Import isn't an option - maybe you could try Project.
Edited by: wildmight on Mar 9, 2009 7:58 AM

CR Consistency check

Hi experts,
I'm trying to transport CRs from our system to another one. Before processing further, I'm making some checks: Syntax check and Request Consistency.
But I have a problem with a task: when I try to make the Consistency Check for that task, I get the following warning message:
Object messages: R3TR TABU BSPC_DL_STXTREP2
Object TABU BSPC_DL_STXTREP2 has object function "K", but no key
Object messages: R3TR TABU PPFTSFFXCU
Object TABU PPFTSFFXCU has object function "K", but no key
Object messages: R3TR TABU PPFTWFCU
Object TABU PPFTWFCU has object function "K", but no key
What is the problem? How can I solve it?
Thanks & Regards
Stefano

Looks like you learned something from this
Consistency Check of RPD without opening it
I expect you mark or update on this before you post any thing.
Try out if you can call any batch files from Answers, I dont think you call them.
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on May 13, 2013 11:19 AM

Is Normal? Consistency Check is cancelled when File is Restored

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for