Is there an option to Auto clear search fields?

I have noticed when going into the app store, or our own app, Optmobile, that when I search for something that search stays in the field unless I manually press the X to clear it. Is there an option to clear this field after I press search or enter? I dont want to have to keep clearing the field before entering in a new search, I want it to automatically clear it.

Yes. But if you will have download the linked form and open it up to be able to see all of the code, settings, actions, and document level function needed to make it work.
The note from the form:
"These three fields "auto-tab" to the next field when they reach their character limit.
They use the document level script AutoTab that takes three parameters. The first is the current document, the second is the event object, and the third is the name of the field to tab to.
This sample will only work in Acrobat 4.05 and greater which exposes the setFocus() method for the field object."
The script for the 'custom keystroke' for field 'Text1' is
AutoTab(this, event, "Text2");

Similar Messages

  • Clearing search field history.....?

    Hello.
    When I type in the google search field, many other searches come up automatically as I type. I guess there's a history of previous searches....?
    Is it an auto fill thing?
    Or a cache thing?
    Anyway, the list of previous searches has gotten quite huge, and I'm wondering how I can clear the memory so that when I type in the search field, it won't try and guess what I'm searching, and it won't complete my text.
    thanks
    alex

    Hi Alex,
    If you're referring to the actual text search box on the Google homepage (rather than the Google search box on the Safari menu bar) then you can clear that out via the AutoFill preferences.
    Safari preferences -> AutoFill -> Other forms -> (Edit...)

  • Controlling within mini-player clears search field - annoying bug

    I've come across this annoying (repeatable) bug with iTunes 9... when I listen to music, I like to put an artist's name in the search field, then just let it play on shuffle from those search results. Typically no big deal, however, if I switch to the mini-player, then use any of the controls (play, forward, back) on the mini-player, the search field gets cleared out and it's just playing through the entire library. It's annoying to have to re-enter what was in the search field when it clears like this.
    Does anyone else have this issue? Is there a way to fix it? So far I'm just being careful not to touch the controls in the mini-player while listening to a selection narrowed down from the library with the search field.

    wishnias wrote:
    Is there a way to fix it? So far I'm just being careful not to touch the controls in the mini-player while listening to a selection narrowed down from the library with the search field.
    As a work-around, there is a freeware program that allows full iTunes control from the OS X menu bar which will avoid the need for using the mini player. You can close the iTunes window while leaving the program running and your search will remain intact. Get it here: http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/ipod_itunes/youcontroltunes.html

  • Is there a difference between "Spotlight" & the "Search" field?

    Hi,
    In Lion, is there a difference between searching for a file using SPOTLIGHT . . . or the SEARCH field in the upper left of a folder (if you click your Hard drive.)?
    For example, I have a MacBook Pro with a 2nd hard drive inside.  If I don't "Spotlight" the 2nd hard drive - will the SEARCH field then still work?  Or if I DO SPOTLIGHT it - is it using the same search mechanism using "Find" and "Spotlight"?
    I'm curious how this works?  Thanks very much,
    Larry

    Using COMMAND-F or Finder's search field provides a window like this:
    If you click on the Kind dropdown menu you will see:
    You can select different search criteria for locating files. If you then select Other you will see:
    You can then check the different search attributes you wish to add to the previously shown dropdown menu thus providing many different search criteria.

  • Is there a way to auto populate one field based on a selection made in another field?

    We want to enter an account number and have the account name field auto populate.

    Yes there are many ways.
    Do you want to populate form a controlled source like a database?
    From data stored within the form?

  • Feature Request: allow Layer sort options + math in layer search fields

    First off, thank you so much for implementing layer sorting! I have one suggestion, and that would be to add a sort option by most recently edited or most recently created.
    That and the ability to do math in fields would be sublime.

    Hello Sly,
    I did exactly thuch beast for freehand some years ago. It's called Layersets. Perhaps we can discuss this off list first.
    My Email is [email protected]
    regards
    Michael

  • Auto-clear previous script output on running next command

    Hi
    Is there a way to auto-clear the previous script output when i run the next sql? Thanks
    Rgds
    Ung

    As for now, you may manually use Clear button on it.
    Out of my curiosity, why would you need to automatically clear the previous output?
    Here is another consideration, if your statement contains error, would you still want it to be automatically erased?
    IMO, keeping the previous output is really preferable.
    Please notice there are two ways of executing command, using F9 (execute) and F5 (run script). Both of them are reported under Script Output tab.
    Imagine after executing update or delete statement followed by commit, currently you may still see the information on inflicted record instead of having the script output only containing "commited".
    Or... you execute many updates, and still can see the whole count of updated records, instead of getting the last one only.
    As for now, I am very disagree with this feature.
    Regards,
    Buntoro

  • Removing search field

    Hi there,
    How can i remove standard search field drop down options in WEB UI. PFA for your reference
    Regards,
    Prem

    Hi Prem,
    Is that screen from agent inbox from interaction center? If so, that list is generated dynamically, and you can manipulate it with BADI CRM_IC_INBOX_BADI, method MANIPULATE_RESP_DROPDOWN_LIST.
    See if it helps!
    Kind regards,
    Garcia

  • Exclude search field in query

    I create a ViewObject and define a view criteria in the view object.  In the view criteria, I add a few attributes.  These attributes are displayed in the Search Panel of a form.  For one of these search fields, I do not want it to be used in the query directly.  I need to get the entered value in this field and use the value in the query in a different way (I override executeQuery() and programmatically use the entered value).  Is there any way to exclude this search field to be used in query directly?
    Thanks.

    User, which jdev version do you use?
    Your approach is tricky. You should tweak the view criteria item clause (and leaf the original where clause as is). The framework calls the query at different points in time and once you changes the query in executeQuery you have no control what's going on after that.
    For a ssample how to tweak the viewcriteria item where clasue check out http://tompeez.wordpress.com/2011/08/21/extending-viewcriteria-to-use-sql-contains-4/
    Timo

  • Multiple words don't work in search field

    When I enter multiple keywords in any search field nothing shows up.
    Let's say I'm looking for pink flowers. If I enter 'flowers' I see all my flower shots, as soon as I enter a comma, all photos disappear. If I go ahead and add 'pink', I still don't see anything. This happens in any search field whether in the browser or within a HUD.
    If I use a HUD, add text fields and enter 'flowers' and 'pink', think I see pink flowers. If I use the keyword checklist in the HUD, I see pink flowers. But I can never use multiple words separated by commas.
    What's wrong? I've checked the Aperture Manual and can't figure out why the multiple word method doesn't work.

    I always use the keyword search panel in the HUD when I am looking for keyworded images...multiples work fine there. I suspect the "text" search field is parsed EXACTLY as it says, examining a string and looking for a match anywhere in the metadata. My suspicion is that the comma is being parsed as JUST THAT, a comma, rather than a search field separator.
    My 2¢
    cheers,
    david

  • When I am on my home screen on the iPhone, swipe left to the search page. Put a letter in the search field. then scroll down. eventually you get to all your texts previously deleted or not. The are all there. How can I clear the entire text from the phone

    When I am on my home screen on the iPhone, swipe left to the search page. Put a letter in the search field. then scroll down. eventually you get to all your texts previously deleted or not. The are all there. How can I clear the entire text from the phone

    When I am on my home screen on the iPhone, swipe left to the search page. Put a letter in the search field. then scroll down. eventually you get to all your texts previously deleted or not. The are all there. How can I clear the entire text from the phone

  • Is there any way to recover google searches after clearing form data?

    I cleared Saved Form Information which has erased my Google searches. Is there any way to restore these searches?

    No there isn't.
    Why are you still using that old 1.5.0.12 version of Firefox? That's like almost 4 years old and is missing many security updates.
    http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html

  • Is there any workaround to auto-select the shipping options upon entering the zip/postcode?

    Is there any workaround to auto-select the shipping options upon entering the zip/postcode? Because currently, the user still needs to select the shipping option again (radio button type).

    Yeah, but its custom coding in conjunction with a 3rd party for the postcode lookup. You also then need to handle the annoying dom manipulation BC does with its code on things like discount code fields, shipping option changes etc effecting your code. You really need to have a good understanding of coding AND BC in this case unfortunatly.
    Possible though, but if you do not want to pay for it to be done or not able to do it yourself - Best to avoid this if you can on the project.

  • AUTO CLEARING CONFIGURATION

    how to configur auto clearing (open item clearing )
    wht is the use of GR/IR clearing account in f.13
    plz tell use of both

    Hi,
    See from SPRO: General Ledger Accounting / Business Transactions / Open Item Clearing / Assign Clearing Rules to Account Types. Normal this is what to fill in but there are some other options.
    When you post an GR on a Purchasing order and an invoice this is posted on a clearing account (open item management) When you run F.13 it clears automatically these items. For GR/IR clearing you don't have to set up in customizing.
    For other clearings perhaps you have to sut-up come customizing
    Paul

  • Auto clearing of Accounting entries posted via MIRO & MR8M

    Hi Gurus,
    Currently we are doing the development relating to u201CDuplicate Invoice checku201D.
    In one of the scenario system is referring the Accounting document of the cancelled MIRO.
    Subject accounting document is there in the open items (FBL1N) and the corresponding reversal accounting document (Generated via MR8M) is also reflecting in the Open items (FBL1N).
    MIRO documents get cancelled via T-code u2013 MR8M & the Material documents shows the cancelled / relevant document reference against each other.
    Since both of our accounting document (generated via MIRO & MR8M) are appearing in Open items system is referring that in our Duplicate Invoice check development which we want to avoid.
    If I am not wrong, in case of SD Billing document if we reversed, system automatically cancelled the relevant accounting document against each other.
    Does anybody have an idea as how to clear these 2 accounting documents  (MIRO & MR8M) against each other ?
    Regards,
    Shridhar

    Hi Prasad,
    Thanks for the option but we had aready given a though about clearing the Vendor line items.
    In stead of F-44, we can set the F.13, background scheduling with daily execution and can clear the documents. Background execution in the night will occupy our space hence need instant result if possible. As well as background execution will happend in the timing after office hours so could be the case that before doing auto clearing someone may get the concern cancelled accounting document pertaining to the cancelled MIRO (Vendor Invoice - Line item) in the open items.
    While doing the MR8M (Logistic Inv Reversal) alongwith Material Document reversal can we clear the accounting documents instantly on its own against each other ?
    Regards,
    Shridhar

Maybe you are looking for