Issue in EHP5 Talent Management (Team Goals) Cascade goals functionality

Hi Friends,
Issue in EHP5 Talent Management (Team Goals) Cascade goals functionality.
Under Team Object While try to cascade goals, it pop-Up Warning Msg u201CChoose Save to save the goal in the employee document. The goal can no longer be deleted, only set to obsoleteu201D.
If we click Ok to proceed further, I am getting error stating u201CYou have made no selection" and " No appraisal template defined ".
Same functionality is working fine in u201CPerformance Management (Predefined)u201D
With Regards
Seranjeeve Kumar

Please set the parameter PROCESS "PMP" in the iview configuration.
ie
ROLE_ID=PA&PROCESS=PMP in application parameters
content provided by SAP ->
specialist ->
Talent management Specialist ->
iViews ->
COmpany goals etc
and you can confirm using this
CL_HAP_CASCADE_GOALS > meth0d GET_VALID_APPRAISAL_TEMPLATES
The parameter mentioned in the note 1457057, the one that you enter in
transaction SE80 is the default value. However, if you call application
with parameter PROCESS=PMP then the PMP process for cascading goals will
be used.
check note 1523527

Similar Messages

EHP5 Talent managment spl launchpad HRTMC/REPORTING configuration

Hi Friends,
Kindly let me known how the BI data are enabled via launchpad HRTMC/REPORTING .
While clicking Talent managment spl --> Reports Iview --> I am getting Error " The launchpad HRTMC/REPORTING doesn't exist.".
Please your solution on launchpad HRTMC/REPORTING congfiguration.
With regards
Seranjeeve Kumar

refer here
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/en/3f/6efcf555334d9e981c36e253dc2aec/frameset.htm
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11079429&

Talent Management Enhancement pack 4 Business Function HCM_TCM_CI-1

This business function contains some new job architecture functionality that we would like to utilize. These new object types are functional name (FN) and job family (JF). We do not plan to configure any of the talent management functionality because we will not be using it at this time. Activating this business function also activates a functionality called Embedded Search which requires TREX 7.1. We do not plan to do any of the configuration for the embedded search functionality either at this time as we don't think we will need it.
My question is, is anyone aware of any issues that might arise or what other SAP functionality that might be impacted by moving this business function into our Production environment without doing any of the configuration. We have implemented SAP Payroll, Benefits, Org management, Personnel Administration, eRecruiting and Learning.
Thanks in advance for any advise you can provide.

Hi Kathy:
In a nutshell, you shouldn't run into any issue. You're just going to get a host of new web dynpro apps, OM data, and infotypes for the Central Person (the 74XX infotypes). If you don't use them, then that's fine, it won't hurt anything.
You should be just fine using the HRP1001 450 relationships from JF to FN and C to help drive your job architecture. You would potentially need to use transaction HRTMC_PPOM to manage your job family/functional area relationships, but you won't negatively impact anything you have already implemented.
If you're not going to use any of the Talent Mgmt functionality, you also don't need to worry about enterprise search or TREX. I'm assuming you aren't using Succession Planning in eRecruiting, right? If you do ever consider using the Talent Management functionality you've now implemented, you will have to migrate data over from the old eRecruiting version of Succession Planning. Other than that, you should be good to go.
Hope that helps!
Thanks,
Chris

Issue in creating dev plan in talent management specialist role

Hi ,
I am facing issue in creating development plan through talent management specialist role . Actually in one system I have 2 location one is india & another one is USA . its working for india but when I search india employee its show no employee found . can you please guide me
Tarun

Hi Luke ,
According to one of your article , I run HRALXSYNC in r/3 , in that all indian employee are green but USA employee in RED . I found following error , can you please guide me that what is mean by that ?
The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_INFOTYPE=============CM003 line 117
Qualification 90007487 does not exist
The incorrect HR object has the key 01NA90011026
The incorrect infotype record is 40601NA900110265105 1 1900010199991231
The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_QUALIFICATION========CM001 line 69
Serious error; see log
The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_CANDIDATE_INFOTYPE_BLCM00B line 99
Serious error; see log
The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_INFOTYPE=============CM003 line 117
Qualification 90007487 does not exist
The incorrect HR object has the key 01NA90011026
The incorrect infotype record is 40601NA900110265105 1 1900010199991231
The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_QUALIFICATION========CM001 line 69
Serious error; see log
The error occurred in program CL_HRRCF_CANDIDATE_INFOTYPE_BLCM00B line 99
Thanks
Tarun

Talent Management & Succession Planning

Hi
As part of the EHP4 functional upgrade of HCM core processes for Talent Management such as Succession Planning or talent development is getting switched on.
Any input on the impact it will have on existing BI reports on succession planning which is based on ehp3 data model.
(The latest talent Management and talent development BI content is available only in the release of EHP5 package)
Thanks & Regards
Venkat

Hi Dinu,
It sounds like a data issue. SP is probably reading the HRP1001 values but somewhere the data may have been corrupted or an object incorrectly deleted/unassigned. I would just delete the relationship in PP01 if not actual successor is assigned.
Kind regards,
Luke

Obsolete section in Talent Management Development Plan standard portal view

Hi all,
In Talent Management Development Plan standard portal view theres a section called "Obsolete" . In what conditions do development goals fall into that section?
Thanks for the help.

Dear Luke,
Thank you for your reply.
All those Services were activated already. I just checked once. All fine.
We dont have any issues with other templates. All are working fine.
But at the time of saving Development Template in Config Define Process Periods and Groupings,we got an error message as below
Process DEVP cannot be grouped
Message no. HRTMC_TM_ASSESSMENT051"
Despite the error message the Development template still got saved. Is this an issue ?
Below is the Config screen shot.
Appreciate your support.
Kind regards
Sathya

Regarding Talent Management Infotypes !!!

Hi Seniors,
As,I am assigned to work on career and succession planning module... I would like to know about the info types 7400, 7410, 7402, 7403 .... etc.
When to maintain these info types ?
Where to maintain info types?
How to see these info types?
Pls suggest
Regards,
Ritu

Hi Ritu,
The Portal is for the following applications:
Talent Profile for Employees
Talent Profile for Managers and Talent Management Specialists
Talent Review Meetings
Talent Groups
Corporate Goals and Values
Talent Assessment
None of these processes can be managed in the SAP R/3 system. Therefore it is not possible to have a holistic end-to-end succession management process, since you can only manage succession planning of positions.
For your search issue, have you installed and configured TREX? See this blog for information:
Setting up NetWeaver Embedded Search (TREX) for SAP HCM Talent Management EhP4, 5 and 6
Best regards,
Luke

Error while creating the Connector in PRD - Trex in Talent Management

Dear Luke,
Greetings.
We are in ECC 6, Eph4.
While setting up the TREX in Production we are encountring an error as below. But we dont have any issue in Development and Quality system. TREX related to Talent Management is working fine.
Would be great if you share your inputs.
Kind regards
Sathya

Dear Luke,
Thank you for response. We have posted an OSS message. SAP is suspecting this to a support pack level kind of issue. So we are waiting for a solution from SAP.
Appreciate your support.
Kind regards
Sathya

Is TREX mandatory for Talent Management?

Dear Experts,
Is TREX a mandatory component for Talent Management? It's because I am having issue when I click "Search" in Talent Management Specialist Launchpad, telling me "Error occurred during the search; contact your system administrator".
And it seems to me that TREX supports only LINUX and MaxDB, which is totally out of our company's landscape.
Thanks,
Steven

Hi Steven,
TREX is the search engine itself. That means Talent management is using enterprise search and enterprise search uses TREX to perform searches and store data.
Enterprise Search is part of SAP Netweaver ABAP ( also called embedded search ). Enterprise search is responsible to index data from HR to TREX and is responsible to redirect search requests from Talent management to TREX and put back the results back to the UI. It also provides tools to maintain and administer the data models.
So Enterprise Search is available on your Netweaver ABAP system. But ES uses TREX. That means if you want to get ES up and running you need TREX. (normaly installed on a different box and connexted by RFC to the Netweaver System)
hope that helps.
Martin Hastik

Configuring TREX for HCM Talent management functionality using Nakisa

Hi,
We are configuring the Talent Management functionality in ECC-HR system.We have installed TREX 7.1 patch number 36 and Nakisa.
We are using the 'embedded search' functionality.
Now, also and are trying to create indexes using the Administration cockpit (tcode ESH_COCKPIT).
However we are getting the error 'System DHS, client 100: A connection already exists' while creating a 'search connector' in the cockpit.
Also, we are getting the below log error in the system in SM21:
''TREX_ICM - Send_Error; return code = 112, return text =HTTPIO_PLG_ICM_CONNECT_FAILED-Fehle''
Kindly let us know what should be done.
Thanks & Regards,
Kunal.

Hi,
Now the initial error we were getting is resolved by applying one note suggested by SAP OSS.
However, now we have another issue, while creating indexes using tcode ESH_COCKPIT in the backend system.
We get error when we try to go to tcode TREXADMIN --> TREX
ABAP Customizing --> 'Net Performance'.
It gives the error below:
ERROR
Remote communication failure with partner http://:33003/ICMConnectTest
HTTP Status 507: Kernel error:ICM_HTTP_CONNECTION_FAILED (400 )
Kindly let us know why we get the error because even while recreating
the indexes we get similar error i.e. Remote communication failure with
partner http://cca1cs0872:33003/asxml/multiIndexCellTable
The icm timeout parameter is sufficiently large i.e. around 30 minutes.
Also, the RFC (TREX_DHS) from ECC-HR system to the TREX is working fine.
Thanks & Regards,
Kunal.

Talent management: talent information

Hi gurus,
I've used a day or two trying to locate this issue, can't seem to find anything, so hopefully some of you have experienced this before.
Currently I'm working on what's supposed to display in talent information in portal, and the weird thing is that some employees gives results on all the fields, and some are almost blank. The fields are defined, and new fields are created through BAdI, these works fine. I tried to change the org unit of some persons (into test org unit), to get real PERNR (which is the statement for one of the fields), and not only fictional PERNR from the test persons, here is where the issues starts.
Ref IMG documentation:
"If you want to implement the Talent Management and Talent Development application, a Business Partner (object type BP) object must exist for each of the central persons (object type CP) in your system."
I access transaction SA38, and runs the program HR_SYNC_PERSON. What I've found out, is that persons with IT6 result in a Basic Data error, people without IT6 runs smoothly through, and displays all wanted information. Why is that, how can it be that persons with address data won't work? IT6 uses time constraint 1, and deletion is not a option. How can I solve this?
QUESTION: Have any of you defined XXDEFAULT as a address type (cross client)? IMG-path: SPRO u2013 SAP BP u2013 BP u2013 Basic settings u2013 Address determination u2013 Define address types
- This may solve the issue, but I'm not comfortable doing changes cross client. Hope there are other solutions.
I would really appreciate some help, and please ask if more information is needed.

Hi Smriti,
You cannot search for Talent Group = ''. Try Talent Group = '*' instead.
For the second issue, it looks an issue with the Talent Group names. First, check SAP Note 1555220 - Activation of advanced search for TMS to ensure that you have the prerequisite SAP Notes installed. I would also raise an OSS message as there doesn't appear to be any SAP Notes on the issue.
Best regards,
Luke

Talent Management (EhP4) - cannot find structural authorization profiles

Hi All, 
I have looked in 3 different SAP ECC6.0 EhP4 system for the Talent Management structural authorization profiles stated in the IMG documentation and on the help.sap.com website. The profiles are: 
TMS_PROFILE 
TMS_ALL 
TMS_MAN_PROF 
There are also several "sub" profiles for TMS_PROFILE. 
To take an example from help.sap.com on their Authorizations page (http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/7b/6f92413c3a2e7be10000000a1550b0/content.htm ), the SAP_TMC_SUPER_TALENT_MANA_SPEC clearly indicates the TMS_ALL structural authorization profile is in the standard system: 
Authorizations for talent management superusers 
For more information, see Talent Management Superuser. 
The structural authorization profile TMS_ALL is also available as a template for the Talent Management Superuser. 
For more information, see Customizing for Talent Management and Talent Development under Basic Settings ® Authorizations in Talent Management ® Define Structural Authorizations. 
So... does anybody know anything about these and where I can find them? Do they require some form of activation outside of the standard switch activations for Talent Management? I've looked in several tcodes (SU01,PCFG, OOSP etc) for them but no luck. 
Any help gratefully received and points will be awarded for helpful answers and solutions! 
Best regards, 
Luke

Hey Luke:
Could you do me a favor and look in client 000 (the SAP delivered client)? You generally need a basis person for this activity, and I can't find one now on my own end to confirm my theory. However I'm pretty sure if you went to OOSP in client 000, you'd see those profiles. They were either never copied over from 000 or your security friends deleted all the profiles that are SAP delivered in the clients you're looking at.
I could talk for a super boring amount of time about the security concept of "SAP delivers too much access with their roles so we don't use them" that a good number of security teams use - but that's a story for a different day.
Take a peek in 000 and let me know what you see. If they're there, you can always have your basis chums copy them over to your clients that you want them in (presumably your security config client).
Thanks,
Chris

Complaint-Need POC for Escalation beyond "Management Team"

We returned an iPhone 5 through the Edge program in November and our account has been charged for a failure to return equipment charge in the amount of $334. Since that time, we have placed numerous phone calls to Verizon to verify that the phone was received and tickets were subsequently created during each call to resolve our equipment charge. Each call we were assured that the phone was received in the warehouse, and that it would take 2-3 billing cycles for the equipment charges to be removed from the account.
When we continued to inquire why the charges were still on our account and late fees were accruing, we were notified that the tickets were not being routed properly to the warehouse to locate our phone. When we further inquired with phone calls, we were advised that the warehouse received a return from us, that there was a iPhone 5 in the box, but that the serial number that they received didn’t match the phone that they were expecting.
I spoke with someone on your Management Team March5th and he tried to help locate the device. He provided IMEI serial numbers for all phones that had been associated with this phone number in the past and asked that I get in touch with Best Buy to seek other IMEI serial numbers so that he could locate the phone (I had used the warranty program through Best Buy just before trading it in the Verizon Edge and that is the reason for the difference in serial numbers). Ultimately we could not resolve the issue. We have asked that the charges be removed from our account our that the representative from the Management team return the box with the iPhone 5 in it that the warehouse received in November from us. He advised that he could not remove the charges or locate the device and there that “If” the device had come through the warehouse it had probably been refurbished and reprovisioned. He also added that he couldn’t be certain that we didn’t send an empty box. This was an odd comment as the each representative that we spoke with in the past have all verified that the warehouse had indeed received an iPhone 5 from us, and we now knew that the confusion was focused on the serial number not matching on the phone.
I take great exception to the change in discussion after 4 months that I would dishonestly send an empty box to Verizon. My wife and I are Federal Homeland Security Employees, have been loyal Verizon Wireless customers for years, ensured that we utilized the Best Buy warranty program to send a working phone back to Verizon.
When I originally signed up for the early Edge program, I anticipated that it would be seamless. I had no idea that 4 months later, countless hours of my time would be spent frustrated, calling Verizon for status, worried about my account, and now being insulted by the Customer Service Management.
Please put me in touch with someone that can resolve this issue swiftly. The representative we spoke with yesterday stated that there was no one with more authority than him to resolve this issue.

i am in the exact same boat. i am a sheriff sergeant, and i have been with vz for years! i switched to the "more everything" plan...and it has been "more of a headache" than anything. two non return device fees added to my account, and i have returned 5 fives. three they cant find, one they sent back because it was late, and one they kept (the nicest of the bunch that was mailed the exact same time).
there "customer service" folks obviously don't know the definition of that phrase, and "andrew" supposedly the "Manager" told me they would refund the amount of the one phone they kept, but not the other. i told him i was dissatisfied with the outcome and wanted to speak with someone above him. he said "the problem is resolved." i reminded him that i was the customer, a good, long term, always paying customer, and i did not think it was resolved. he assured me that it was. i demanded he direct me to his supervisor. he said it would take a "call back" in 72 hours.
i will be returning all phones, paying my actual usage charges, NOT THE BOGUS FEES, and i will take my long term, 280 dollar a month bill to AT&T.
the higher ups in the company should realize the subordinates don't have a concept of what it took to build an empire like verizon has become. but like every failed business before, verizon will collapse if they do not get back to basics of "Customer Service."

Talent Management - PDF Docs IMG Config Step

Hello,
We are having some issues with the configuration step u201CAssign Application Forms to Elements of PDF-Based Documentsu201D.
Here are the steps we have taken so far:
1) Copied the Application Forms from Client 000 (HRTMC_RM_COVER, HRTMC_RM_TALENT_AGENDA_TOPIC, HRTMC_TALENT_PROFILE, HRTMC_TALENT_SHORT_PROFILE) to our Sandbox & Development Clients
2) Set u2018Use Complex Bundlingu2019 to u201Ctrueu201D via FPCONNECT (SM31)
3) Attempted to add the different u201CParameter valuesu201D HRTMC values (specified above) to the IMG config step assign application forms to elements of pdf-based docs
When trying to complete #3, we receive an error u2018enter a valid valueu2019. I checked both the Application Forms and the Forms Class and these objects exist, and are active. We even re-transported the objects to see if that was the problem, but it did not work.
Any thoughts to why we are receiving this message?

Can anyone tell me how doea the portal talent management configuration work???

Talent Management - Appraisal

Hi,
I have created a plan with the following tasks:
Objective Setting : 01/01/2008 30/06/2008
Mid Year Appraisal : 01/07/2008 15/07/2008
Mid Year Objective Reviewal : 01/12/2008 20/12/2008
Final Year Appraisal : 25/12/2008 31/12/2008
Assume that, I completed the Objective setting and Mid year appraisal. But during objective reviewing (employee updating existing objectives and adding some objectives), whether the employee can see all the objectives which were appraised during Mid Year Appraisal or not?. (The reviewed objectives will be used in Final Year Appraisal.)
Thanks in advance.

TimW wrote:
Objective setting and appraisals cannot be open at the same time. So, if you want to continue updating objectives you have to reset the objective setting period after the mid-year appraisal. However, as long as the mid-year and end-year appraisals are part of the same plan, you can continue to see the objectives from the first part of the year.
If objectives are not completed in the first year, they can be carried forward to the next year if you define the 2nd years plan as being linked to the first year.
Be careful, because there have been many reports of problems in this area! Lots of patches have had to be applied around this functionality. I would advise making sure that you have all the Talent Management rollup patches.
Regards
TimHi Tim,
We are implementing a scenario almost exactly like the thread describes and we are already having issues. Please can you point to us where to download all the Talent Management Rollup patches so that we can have a stable system. Thank.
-Regards,
Ibrahim

Issue in EHP5 Talent Management (Team Goals) Cascade goals functionality

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for