Issue related to STO return billing

hi expert,
1) user have created PO then created delivery
then Invoice. now user have created return
delivery and when user try to bill the return
quentity. system give error" sales organisation is
not define"
so guid me where to check and its transection
code.
Alicia

Alicia,
Can you please explain the scenario totally, is it a intercompany transfer or intracompany transfer, based on that scenario we can have solution.
Venkat

Similar Messages

Issue telated to STO return invoice

hi expert,
1) user have created PO then created delivery
then Invoice. now user have created return
delivery and when user try to bill the return
quentity. system give error" sales organisation is
not define"
so guid me where to check and its transection
code.
2) can any body tell me the process of STO
delivery,billing . then STO return process in detail
with Tcode.in how many ways we can perfrom
the STO scnario.
Regds
Alicia

Hi,
Check this out please :
Re: stock transport order
almost same.
Best regards,
Sridhar

Return to Warehouse from other plant - Related to STO return

Hi Gurus,
We have a scenario at our client:
We had a stock transfer order from plant 1 to plant 2. In plant 2 we did the created the delivery - created transfer order - performed good issue - confirmed transfer order and the material is issue to stock in transit i.e. mvt 641. Then we do a GR in the other plant 1 (who issued the STO). Then we do a return MIGO with 122 Mvt. in plant 1. Now what should be the process for receiving back the returned material in the warehouse again? How to relate the return with deliveriy created for STO?
thanks for any input.
regards,
KHAN

Hi,
Go with below transactions:
VL09-PGR Reversal
VL02N-Delete the Out.Delivery Document
MIGO-For cancellation of GR Document ( With selection of "Cancellation-Material Document -Enter your GR document number>>click on enter button>>you will get GR Document scenario screeen >>Tick on "Item OK box">>check and post).
Your GR document shall be reverse and update your material stock also.
Hopfully your problem is solved.
Thanx-Rajesh

Issue related to STO

Dear all
I need to know abt that where we assigned pricing procedure in STO.
waiting ur reply.
regads l
akhendra

Hi Lucky,
If you are talking about STOs created via ME21n i.e MM route, then the following link will certainly help you to understand the Pricing Procedure Determination in Stock Transport Orders. In Material Management module, Pricing Procedure is called as Calculation Schema. Pricing Proc detn is called as Schema Determination.
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/75/ee1fa755c811d189900000e8322d00/frameset.htm">Calculation Schema Determination in STOs</a>
The Path is
<b>SPRO>IMG>Material Management--> Purchasing -->Conditions >Define Price Determination Process>Define Schema Determination-->Determine Schema for Stock Transport Orders</b>
Thanks

Movement Type 161error in STO return (Plant to Plant) at the time of goods issue .

Hi all...
Am getting the following error while posting goods issue through VL02N
Update control of movement type is incorrect (entry 161 X X _ L)
Message no. M7226
Diagnosis
The system could not find entry 161 X X _ L in any of the movement type control tables.
Process : STO Return Plant to Plant.
Purchase Order ( STO) done.
Goods issue done.
Goods receipt at the receiving plant.
Amended Purchase order, added one more line item and ticked return.
Inbound delivery done.
VL02n Goods issue am getting the error.
Pls help.
Suhas
MM consultant

Update control of movement type is incorrect (entry 161 X X _ L)
Have a look into your OMJJ customizing for 161 movement type:
It probably looks like mine:
the error message has the info in exact the same sequence
161 X X _ L
this is 161, checkmark checkmark blank L in the table above.
L would mean reference to a delivery.
But as you can see here, there is no L, everything is B which means reference to purchase order.
It is not allowed to add items in a delivery without purchase order reference, it is technically possible, but it finally ends in the error you have.
The process has to start from the purchase order.

For STO with billing how to take material in plant stock without cancelling excise duty

Hi,
Please suggest for STO with billing how to take material back in plant stock without cancelling excise duty.
Scenario is
Material transffered from manufacturing plant to depot,material is in transit now, but due to some reason material calls back to manufacturing plant.
Since the excise invoice is raised and material move out of factory client can not cancel excise invoice from legal point of view & client has to pay excise duty for the material movement.
Please suggest how to take back goods to manufacturing plant without cancelling excise invoice.
We have suggested client as there is no provision to take back goods to manufacturing plant without cancelling excise invoice
and to take back material to manufacturing plant stock they have to cancel excise invoice and other related documents.
But client is asking for another options.So requesting you to please suggest any alternative ways for same.
Thanks,
Amit

client can not cancel excise invoice from legal point of view & client has to pay excise duty for the material movement
I don't think, there is a statutory rule which says, manufacturer should not cancel the excise invoice generated on their Depot plant. Justification can very well be given to Excise authorities and hence, ask your client to follow the normal process by treating this as Depot returns.
G. Lakshmipathi

IInterco STO Return Process

Hi Experts
Clarification on Intercompany STO return order process.
To reverse the Intercompany STO, if i use the Return to Vendor through the MIGO, anyway a delivery can be created against this RTV (MIGO) and perform a Goods Reciept ?
A flow could be : MIGO (Return to Vendor) --> Delivery --> Post Goods Reciept. --> Debit Memo. will it be workable ?
Regards
RG

Hi
For INTERCOMPANY RETURNS there is standard process defined in SAP
Say Plant 1000 belonging to CC 1000 returns stocks to Plant 2000 belonging to CC 2000
Create a PO with order type NB in Plant 1000 with returns indicator ticked
VL10B create a background delivery
MIGO ( goods issue) in plant 1000 with movement type 101 ( In MIGO we can do a goods issue also)
This GI should be done based on the PO and not on outbound delivery document created
PGR in plant 2000 in VL02N ( Only after the MIGO in Plant 1000 we can do a PGR here )
Intercompany returns billing ( credit memo IG document type) in company 2000 for plant 1000
The flow will be
PO-MIGO-VL10B-VL02N-PGR---VF01
This is the flow
To achieve this a lot of config settings are required
The standard Intercompany returns delivery type for is NCR
The movement type in delivery is 673
Schedule line category is NS
The item category in delivery is NCRN
The billing type is IG
Regards
Raja
Edited by: ramanathan raja on Feb 9, 2011 8:57 AM

Hello I don't know who to complain to as you do not appear to have a complaints department, despite searching the web, I trust you can pass this to relevant department for action, as I'm very angry over my recent repair. Following my issue relating to a

Hello
I don't know who to complain to as you do not appear to have a complaints department, despite searching the web, I trust you can pass this to relevant department for action, as I'm very angry over my recent repair.
Following my issue relating to a blank screen 2 weeks ago, your advisor arranged for my iMac to collected by Amsys, for repair and return, this was done and it was returned to me last Tuesday, onWednesday I set up my iMac again and instantly realised I had problems, much worse than before. I called Amsys to inform them of the issue of the computer being very very slow and unable to open iPhoto and pages, and document listing would not show up, plus I had no sound on the mac.They informed me that they had only replaced the video card and what they had done would have not affected the computers performance. He suggested I reinstall OSX again which I did, but this made no difference to the programs, so I called you.
Your technician on the phone was very good as they have always been, and made an appointment for me to go into the Milton Keynes Apple store the next day at 1 pm, which I did.
The gentleman on the Genius Bar was very good and was able to run tests on the iMac in my presence, and diagnosed immediately an issue with the sound problem, and advised me that this could not be fixed while I wait and I would need to leave it for repair. I made him aware of the previous repair, and he was able to see via your system, the list of logged issues I have had with this since purchasing in September 2012. I'm sure you can see from the way you record all calls and issues the problems I have had.
Today I called to ask if my iMac would soon be ready for collection, I was told the repairs had been completed and it was being tested. However to my dismay, I learned of another serious issue relating to the repair carried out by Amsys. I was informed that 6 screws were missing from the the iMac internally, which caused me much distress and concern, they also told me I had to wait even longer as the screws had to be ordered and installed on arrival before I could collect it.
My issues here are: I trusted the Amsys repairer as it was arranged and recommend by you, it is very evident they are not competent to repair, as they have caused more problems with my iMac on its return, despite enclosing a checklist, fully ticked showing everything working well, it clearly wasn't ! Plus the issue of missing parts (screws) during the repair, I have already expressed my disgust with Amsys, by email and had a response, within the hour, apologising and told me they were looking into this.
This where I stand on this, I have not had my iMac for almost two weeks and I do not know when I will get it back. I'm also very worried about what other damage has been caused by Amsys and the quality of my iMac now. I want to know what you, Apple is going to do about this ? I have already been very inconvenienced by this and until now I have been a very loyal apple customer with 2 iPads, and 4 iPhones in our household, not to mention the iMac.
I feel I have been very let down by this experience, on my iMac, which cost a lot of money, I have also lost a lot of money with lost work and unable to carry out my business without it, and I will be seeking compensation.
I trust you will take this complaint seriously and pass it to the relevant department for action.
Yours sincerely
Des Withey
Sent from my iPad
On 26 Feb 2014, at 11:44, Apple Support <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks for contacting us.
Thanks for contacting Apple Support. If you need more help later, you can open the case below or start a new support request online.
Case ID:
Open this case
Sincerely,
Apple Support
Get help online
Visit Apple Support to learn more about your product, download software updates, and much more.
Join the conversation
Find and share solutions with Apple users around the world.
TM and copyright © 2014 Apple Inc. 1 Infinite Loop, MS 96-DM, Cupertino, CA 95014.
All Rights Reserved / Privacy Policy / Apple Support / Give us feedback
On behalf of Apple Distribution International

Call Apple Customer Relations - 1-800-275-2273. Ask politely & firmly that you want to be transferred to Customer Relations. Tell them exactly what you stated in your post.
GOOD LUCK!
These are user-to-user forums where everyday folk (volunteers) post questions and offer answers (technical support) to each other.

Issue related to the Credit memo and S.O.

Hi,
I have one issue related to the Credit memo and S.O.
We have a network of Dealers and Dealer inventory is linked with our system. When user creates S.O for Dealer1.If the item is not avail in our inventory and it is avail in any other Dealer inventory (Dealer2), then the system creates S.O wrt the Dealer2.
In this case as the material is directly delivered from Dealer1 to Dealer2, there is no any GI in our system.
So, the transaction with Dealer1 will be the normal as usual. But, we have to return the goods amount to the Dealer2 with any suitable way. We are considering it as a Credit memo.
My question is, as we have created S.O wrt the partner function- Dealer1 and we are creating CR memo for Delaer2, is there any way through which we can link the se two transactions with customizing so that we need not to make any ABAP programming.
I mean can we create Cr memo wrt S.O when the partner functions are different?
Pl. guide me.
Thanks,
Roopan.

You have an interesting Scenario.
You can handle this scenario in multiple ways
1. Third party Scenario (Here Dealer 1 becomes Vendor &Dealer 2 remains Customer)
2. Order related sales & credit memo.
3. Intercompany sales, where you represent dealers place as a plant in your system. (Not an ideal way to handle the scenario, but possible option)
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward points if helpful.

Issue related to the Excise Postings

Issue related to the Excise Postings
My Scenario is i have an Purchase Order with Excise Duty of 16.48%
For Eg: Net Price(1000) + Excise Duty (16.48%) = Rs.1164.8
my vendor gives me a Modvat of 10% i.e Rs.104.8
but i have to pay him the total amount (i.e with excise)=Rs.1164.8
How to do the GR with Excise & Invoice Verification??
Wat amount will be Credited to vendor???
How to do Excise Posting for this Scenario???
Thanx & Regards,
Kumar Rayudu
Message was edited by:
Kumar Rayudu

Hiii Ramakrishna,,
User doesnt know at the Time of Purchase Order that how much excise & Modvat will be getting. Only the Gross value is given in the Purchase order including all
taxes ( No Tax Code in the Purchase Order).
Excise Invoice and Vendor's Bill are received when the Materials are received.
They will get the Modavat according to the Excise Invoice of the Manufacturer
Now while doing GR i manually give the Excise BED & Cess given in the Manufacturer Excise Invoice.
Post the Excise Invoice before doing MIRO.
The Problem is in the MIRO Transaction.
At the MIRO i have selected the Tax Code with Excise.
System is caluclating the the Excise on the PO Value i.e more than the value in the Vendor Excise Invoice (Part 1 & Part 2) and the Liablity of vendor is increased and the difference amount is posted to the material.
Everything is going fine except the Vendor's liability and it should be value of the Purchase Order.
How the system is caluclating the Value ???
am i doing any wrong procedure???
Explain me???
Thanx & Regards.
Kumar Rayudu

STO returns with EWM Error "Posting with reference to pur. order only possi

Hi Experts,
We are trying to STO returns GR (161 Movement) with transaction MIGO for a EWM managed plant.
Plant A is a EWM managed plant and Plant B is IM managed plant.
We created a stock transfer order with "B" as supplying plant for plant "A" but with "Returns" tick in the item. (Document type UB)
In the first step, when we try to post 161 movement with MIGO transaction, we are getting the below error
"Posting with reference to pur. order only possible for integrated whse"
Message no. L9510
But the same scenario works between two IM managed plants.
Can you please help me in resolving the issue
Gobinathan G

Hi All,
I am interested in the tail end of this process. I have activated DWM. We have received an Idoc confirming the Inbound Delivery for a Purchase Order Receipt.
The Goods Movement Status of the Inbound delivery has changed to C but there is only a Confirmation of Service in the document flow and the Purchase Order is not receipted.
I am unable to MIGO the PO manually.
I guess the Inbound delivery should have posted a receipt on the PO but not sure what is missing?
Any ideas?
Thanks
Lee

How to get the serial Numbers issued for an STO

Hi,
I created my own STO and mapped a serialised material for the same using transaction. I increased the stock by issuing serial numbers. The /SYCLO/MM_DOPURCHASEORDER_GET BAPI returns the PO header, item and longtext details. I want the serial numbers which are issued to the STO and the list of serial numbers for which the receipts has been done.
I want to know how to get the serial numbers which are issued to the STO throught the standard function module. I want only the issued serial numbers not the one for which the receipts has been done.
I tried using the standard BAPI, "BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL1" to get the serial number collection. But the FM is not returning the issued serial number as well as the list of serial numbers for which the receipts has been done. It is returning only the PO history in which the list of document number are present.
Thanks in Advance,
Mohan.

Hi,
Using the transaction "MB1C" and movement type "561", I filled the required details such as Material Number, Quantity, Storage Location and Batch. After filling all these details, when I press enter, it will ask for me to enter the serial numbers equal to the quantity specified. I entered the serial numbers by selecting the available serial numbers for that particular material by pressing F4 help.
Please let me know if you need any more inputs in this regards.
Thanks,
Mohan.

Issue with Foreighn trade during billing

Hi All,
We have an issue related to Foreign trade during billing.
The system is not throwing any error message even though the foreign trade data is not filled.
We have maintained the incompleteness schemas and incompleteness procedures and other relevant settings for foreign trade but the system is not stopping the user from saving the billing document.
Please let us know what needs to be done so that filling the Foreign trade becomes mandatory.
Regards,
Teja

Dear Teja
Go to OVE6, select the origin country and there you can see various "Procedures" listed out with two boxes "Export" and "Import". Maintain "E" under the tab Export against any Procedure and save.
Now go to OVE7, select the origin country and there assign the above procedure to the combination of sales area, Exp/Imp Group and item category.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

STO Return Process

Hi Experts
Interco STO ZNB
Interco Return STO ZNB1
I am creating a Intercompany (ZNB1) Return STO, when i referenced the original STO purchase order having the below error due to the STO & Return STO documents were in different naming convention.
Reference doc. type ZCTC differs from doc. type ZCRC
Message no. 06033
Diagnosis
The reference document type and that of the document to be created are different. They must be identical.
Procedure
Choose a reference document of the document type you have defined for the document to be created.
Rgds
RG
Edited by: R G on Feb 8, 2011 10:26 AM

Hi There
You have ref the STO document for the return STO,, Thats the reason it is providing the error as diff doc types for the Noaml STO and Return STO,,
If you select the ZCTC and return the material from where you received, system will not provide any issue,,, But again it will be considered as straight STO only,,
Also Check the config for both the Doc types in-- IMG-Materials management-Purchasing- Purchase Order-Set up Stock Transport Order-Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule.
if you have defined both clearly, then it will not be a issue i guess
Thanks
Senthil

Plant to Plant STO with billing

Dear Guru's
I am facing a Problem in Plant to plant STO with Billing.As my both plants are Excisable, I have done a copy control between NL and JEX now in Jex proforma invoice i am giving the value for the material and the excise duties. when i go to J1iin the value of Excise is not flowing. I have maintained the delivery type to billing type in Tax on goods movement also.
Kindly guide me.
regards,
Sudhir

hi,
after gone through your problem i realised you are asking excise invoice during intra-comp. billing.
Dear- if you are using UB doc in P.O then no need to mantain actual comercial invoice only req is proforma invoice. You know proforma invoice is not related to accounting if it isnot related how you can generate excise invoice.
If your invoice is related to acconting definitely you can raise a commercial invoice as well as excise invoice . So for this just you check after creation of billing check whether a/c doc. generated or not .
thanks
sunil

Issue related to STO return billing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for