Issue with employe attributes in SRM

Hello All,
In ECC HR Organization structure, multiple employees are assigned to
single position. The organization structure along with employee data is
replicated from ECC to SRM as it is with the help of ALE Standard
interface and PFAL execution.
Issue: Since attributes are assigned at employee position level in SRM
unlike at employee level in ECC HR. If attributes such as company code,
currency, cost center delivery address are different for each employee
in ECC HR and the how can these be assigned to a single position in SRM
org structure as a default attribute for each employee?
SRM Version 7.13 SP02.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks & Regards,
Phanidhar Maddi

Hi Konstantin Anikeev ,
Thanks. We could see that ECC organization structure is replicated as it is to SRM System ( multiple employees assigned to single position) and employees are able to create SC with out any issue. The default attributes are assigned at employee position level.
The challenge is : In case multiple employees assigned to single position are maintained with different values such as company code and delivery address in ECC and which are replicated to SRM system,  how to set default values for each employees?
Regards
Phani

Similar Messages

  • Issue with PO Response in SRM 7.0

    Hi Experts,
    We have upgraded our system from SRM 4.0 to 7.0. Post upgrade we are facing an issue with PO Response document.
    Scenario:
             When the PO is ordred, Vendor sends a the PO response through XML. Our middleware call the an FM which uses BBP_PD_POC_CREATE to create the PO response(BUS2209) with acceptance status.
    Problem:
            The status of the PO response is always + In Process+. But in SRM 4,0 we are having the responce with accepted status.
    Could you please throw somw light on this.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Vishnu Reddy

    There is this note that might help you.
    Note 1393346 - PCO:Header status is open, even all items in PCO accepted
    Although a relatively new note, this note is only relevant for SRM5.0 at the moment. What I'd suggest you do is to (temporarily) modify the standard code (in your development or test system) based on the correction instruction of this note. If it resolves your problem, create an OSS mesasge to SAP and ask them to upport the note to SRM7.0. Then you could reverse your modification back to standard and apply the note officially.

  • Issue with Contract Replication from SRM to MDM  - XML structure

    Hi
    We are having an issue with trnsfering a contract to MDM. We have released the contract for update to MDM in the contract through the distribute to catalog option. An XML is generated in SRM that gets sucessfully passed to PI through Catalogupdatenotification_out. In PI the XML fails in the Interface Determination step. the issue that has been noticed is that the XML that is generated in SRM does not contain product category or product ID which is basically what the condition mapping in PI checks for. The conditions in PI were setup as per SAP.
    But now the XML fails in PI because it does not find a combination for Catalog type code = 03 and product category. Please find the XML structure in SRM and you will see that it does not have a product category even though the contract has one.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    - <n0:CatalogTransmission xmlns:n0="http://sap.com/xi/EBP" xmlns:prx="urn:sap.com:proxy:SS1:/1SAI/TASDE808778FFEB81012891:701:2010/10/07">
    - <StandardBusinessDocumentHeader>
      <ID schemeID="0080">56000004100000000220110616202243</ID>
      <CreationDateTime>2011-06-16T20:22:43Z</CreationDateTime>
    - <SenderParty>
      <InternalID schemeID="PartyID" schemeAgencyID="SS1CLNT100">143</InternalID>
      </SenderParty>
      </StandardBusinessDocumentHeader>
    - <Catalog>
      <ID>5600000410</ID>
      <CatalogTypeCode>03</CatalogTypeCode>
    - <NameList>
      <Name>(Copy of Contract 5600000395)</Name>
      </NameList>
      <ActionCode>04</ActionCode>
      <CompleteTransmissionIndicator>true</CompleteTransmissionIndicator>
    - <ValidityDateTimePeriod>
      <StartDateTime>2011-06-13T12:00:00Z</StartDateTime>
      <EndDateTime>2012-06-12T12:00:00Z</EndDateTime>
      </ValidityDateTimePeriod>
    - <CatalogContent>
    - <ItemList>
    - <Item>
      <ID>1</ID>
      <ActionCode>04</ActionCode>
      <CompleteTransmissionIndicator>false</CompleteTransmissionIndicator>
    - <PropertyValuationList>
    - <PropertyValuation>
      <PropertyReference>/CCM/PRICE</PropertyReference>
    - <PropertyValues>
    - <MultipleValue>
      <Index>1</Index>
    - <SimpleValue>
      <AmountSpecification currencyCode="USD">1.0</AmountSpecification>
      </SimpleValue>
      </MultipleValue>
      </PropertyValues>
      </PropertyValuation>
    - <PropertyValuation>
      <PropertyReference>/CCM/PRICE_BASIS_QUANTITY</PropertyReference>
    - <PropertyValues>
    - <SimpleValue>
      <QuantitySpecification unitCode="EA">1.0</QuantitySpecification>
      </SimpleValue>
      </PropertyValues>
      </PropertyValuation>
    - <PropertyValuation>
      <PropertyReference>CCM/PMNTTRMS</PropertyReference>
    - <PropertyValues>
    - <SimpleValue>
      <NameSpecification>0002</NameSpecification>
      </SimpleValue>
      </PropertyValues>
      </PropertyValuation>
      </PropertyValuationList>
      </Item>
    - <Item>
      <ID>2</ID>
      <ActionCode>04</ActionCode>
      <CompleteTransmissionIndicator>false</CompleteTransmissionIndicator>
    - <PropertyValuationList>
    - <PropertyValuation>
      <PropertyReference>/CCM/PRICE</PropertyReference>
    - <PropertyValues>
    - <MultipleValue>
      <Index>1</Index>
    - <SimpleValue>
      <AmountSpecification currencyCode="USD">12.0</AmountSpecification>
      </SimpleValue>
      </MultipleValue>
      </PropertyValues>
      </PropertyValuation>
    - <PropertyValuation>
      <PropertyReference>/CCM/PRICE_BASIS_QUANTITY</PropertyReference>
    - <PropertyValues>
    - <SimpleValue>
      <QuantitySpecification unitCode="EA">1.0</QuantitySpecification>
      </SimpleValue>
      </PropertyValues>
      </PropertyValuation>
    - <PropertyValuation>
      <PropertyReference>CCM/PMNTTRMS</PropertyReference>
    - <PropertyValues>
    - <SimpleValue>
      <NameSpecification>0002</NameSpecification>
      </SimpleValue>
      </PropertyValues>
      </PropertyValuation>
      </PropertyValuationList>
      </Item>
      </ItemList>
      </CatalogContent>
      </Catalog>
      </n0:CatalogTransmission>
    Edited by: vishakhrajeev123 on Jun 20, 2011 6:49 PM

    Dear Krupa,
    Thank you for your quick reply.
    So we should consider the scenario where SRM is the central repository for the contracts, and all the changes done in SRM should be replicated to ERP.
    In this scenario, do you know which steps should be done to allow contract replication from SRM to ERP? I already created a central contract in SRM but there is no message sent to PI.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Andreia

  • Comptability Issue with IE8.0 in SRM 4.0

    Hi All,
    Some of my SRM users are facing issue with IE 8.0. I understood that IE 8.0 is not a compatible version for SRM 4.0 But just of checking, if you guys have faced this issue and fixed it. This issue could be related to IE - Java - SRM.
    In shop one screen, users can able to do everything. But if they try to open Approval preview tab or Follow-on document tab in check status transactions, then browser is automatically getting refershed and take the user to the portal home page. I believe both these tabs are working on Java. We tried with udpating Java with different versions, but nothing is working with IE8. We do not have any issue IE6.
    Have any one faced the similar issue and fixed it? OR if you have any suggestion, please advise.
    Thanks.
    Arun

    Hi Ricardo,
    Thank you for the reply,
    I checked PAM in service market place. For an end user pc requirement, is it enough to check under ITS in Web browser?
    In that, against IE 8.0 ...it has been mentioned as "Released"? Does it mean that, SAP will support issues occuring with IE 8?
    But I dont see anything related to Java vitual machine.
    Can you please advise, whether my understanding is correct?
    Thanks.
    Arun

  • Issue with URL attribute in Header

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with the URL attribute.
    I have created an header attribute #HDR_TEST_URL and selected the type as URL.
    Given a default value as http://www.google.com as the url
    Associated this attribute to the Notification message.
    But in the notification, the URL is being shown as the plain text not as a link.
    Can you please let me know what I am missing here.
    Thanks

    Please check the notification format if it is text then it might not be shown as a url but if it is HTML it might show up, if it is not showing then i would recommend using the anchor tag to create the Hyperlink.
    Regards,
    Varun

  • Issue with binary attribute types through Directory Proxy Server 6.3.1

    I'm having problems with DPS 6.3.1.1 on Solaris 10 with binary attribute types. From most LDAP servers, requesting an attribute such as userCertificate would return userCertificate;binary without any issues. However, DPS seems to consider these two separate attributes. In order to see userCertificate;binary, I have to ask for it in that exact format. This obviously is causing trouble for many clients as they shouldn't care about the binary type as it's the same attribute.
    I've tried to correct this with a virtual data transformation (dpconf add-virtual-transformation 'PKI Tree' read add-attr-value userCertificate \${userCertificate\;binary}) but the end results are the same. Any ideas on how I can correct this one?
    Thanks in advance.

    Here is some complementary information:
    system (uname -a):
    SunOS xxx 5.10 Generic_142900-13 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440
    since patch 118666-26: update java 1.5.0 update 24
    we are experiencing the follwing problem:
    xxx$ ./dpadm start /opt/ldap/instances/mail/
    The Directory Proxy Server instance '/opt/ldap/instances/mail' failed to start after the waiting period.
    The Directory Proxy Server instance start has produced the following error output:
    Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: strm
    at java.util.zip.Inflater.initIDs(Native Method)
    at java.util.zip.Inflater.<clinit>(Inflater.java:60)
    at java.util.zip.ZipFile.getInflater(ZipFile.java:375)
    at java.util.zip.ZipFile.getInputStream(ZipFile.java:320)
    at java.util.zip.ZipFile.getInputStream(ZipFile.java:286)
    at java.util.jar.JarFile.hasClassPathAttribute(JarFile.java:469)
    at java.util.jar.JavaUtilJarAccessImpl.jarFileHasClassPathAttribute(JavaUtilJarAccessImpl.java:21)
    at sun.misc.URLClassPath$JarLoader.getClassPath(URLClassPath.java:809)
    at sun.misc.URLClassPath.getLoader(URLClassPath.java:293)
    at sun.misc.URLClassPath.getResource(URLClassPath.java:160)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:192)
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:300)
    at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:268)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:320)
    The Directory Proxy Server instance '/opt/ldap/instances/mail' is not running.
    We have tried to install patch 118666-27 (not recommended, but already available) which includes jdk 1.5.0 update 25 -> same problem
    When returning to jdk 1.5.0 update 20 the directory proxy server starts as normal

  • Issue with Business Partner in SRM

    Hi Experts,
    we are sending Business partner data from one client to another client in SRM.
    In the target client for the tab "Control" in the Business Hours,when I click on the calling hours button we are getting an warning message "Assignment of appointment rules to rule ID incorrect"
    we are sending the data related to business hours thru database tables CRMM_BUT_FRG0060 and CRMM_BUT_FRG0061.
    Can any provide me with a solution?
    Regards
    DK

    Hi
    This issue was resolved by SAP by applying some OSS notes.
    Regards,
    Ashish

  • Data issue with Navigational Attribute in the report

    Hi Experts,
    We have a report which has Material and Material Group in the report. Material Group is a navigational attribute of 0Material. We have some 31 material groups in the ODS. However, the report is diaplaying only 3 material Groups. If I use Material Group directly( not as an attribute of material) then it is displaying all the 31 material groups correctly.
    We have a hierarchy which is loaded through Flat file on Material Group. We need the hierarchy to be displayed for all the material groups in the ODS. Please let me know what could be causing this issue?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Kavitha Jagannath

    Hello Kavitha,
    Check if the Material Masterdata is having these Material groups. If not then load this Material masterdata and activate it.
    As your query is using Material group as Navigational attribute then the data should come from this Material Masterdata.
    If your Material has only 3 of th eMat Groups then report will show only 3. Better update this Material masterdata.
    Regards,
    Pratap Sone

  • Issue with Purchase Order in SRM.

    Hi All,
    Issue:
    Requestor name and goods recipient name are empty in the Partner Overview of a Purchase Order. The reason is the requestor who has raised the PO has left the company and not having BP as user number in Portal system any more.These PO's are almost old and closed, but the procurement team needs to trace the trade for the aim of audit, or new conditioning, etc.
    ==========================================================================
    Here my question is how to retain user name there as hardcord so that we can contact to successor.Is it possible through BADI's / BAPI's ?
    As a workaround we asked user to use ME23N tcode(backend).
    Please suggests!!
    Regards,
    Ravi Vardhan

    Hi Ravi,
    Do you have BP guid (which is associated with the user who left the organization) in the PO document. Please check the bbp_pd for this
    purchase order number check the field crmd_partner-partner_no,  we have
    to change this field with the existing business partner. We can't change the document which has invalid requestor / recipient. We have to update these POs with correct requestor / recipient business partner number via a z report.
    Hope this information will help you!!!
    Regards,
    Amudha

  • UP issue with Disallowed attribute

    I have Given name & Surname in "Exclude passwords that match attribute
    values"
    So Jones Ela user is created, UP is set to default, user has 1 grace login,
    password is expired)
    User logs in with default, being informed that last grace login was used,
    needs to change password
    So the user changes password to housejones15
    All is OK, but on next boot the user is being informed that the password
    needs to be changed
    That happens obviously because of
    "Verify whether existing passwords comply with the password policy
    (verification occurs on login)"
    But why the system allowed user to change the password in first place to a
    password in which Surname attribute was used?
    I would expect the user to NOT be allowed to chose such password
    Thanks
    Seb

    No idea, it was looking a "cool" option to have set when i done it years ago
    Removed it now, should make life easier
    Thanks a lot
    Seb
    "ab" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:eJg0u.776$[email protected]..
    > Out of curiosity, is there a reason you are using that option? It's not a
    > default, and causes overhead on every login that is typically not needed
    > (if the password didn't match when it was set then it shouldn't be
    > un-matching now... except in a few less-common cases). I'll see if I can
    > duplicate this and get a bug opened for it. For now, I'd disable the
    > checkbox unless you really need it.
    >
    > Cases that come to mind when the checkbox is mildly useful include when
    > password policies change to become more-complex and enforcement is needed
    > ASAP (users hate this) or maybe when migrating from NDS Password to UP.
    >
    > Good luck.

  • Issue with Transaction Attribute

    Hi All
    I am trying to build a program that will interact with two database at the same time.Lets say, I am getting/updating/inserting data from/to Database1.table1 so I am creating transaction attribute for the same to commit and roll back the changes.
    Now, after the above scenario I need to update my audit trail table in database2 but since I have already created transaction for the above database it not allowing me to connect to database2 saying "Connection already exit for database1 cannot create new transaction for Database2".
    Also if I tried to create a new transaction for Database2 its passing me exception saying "A transaction is already running for the thread cannot create new transaction for the same thread".
    I tried calling a new thread also but the exception remains as the new thread is called from the main thread.
    Please help me in same so that i can create two transaction or connection to two database using same transaction.

    user12882304 wrote:
    ... connection to two database using same transaction.Not possible.
    You are attempting something with a JDBC driver that the driver does not support.
    Your first step is to research distributed transactions.
    For this to actually work the database itself must support it. And you must use the correct idiom to invoke it.

  • Import Issue with Attributes

    Hi everybody,
    during import of approx. 16.000 records I am facing an issue concerning the attributes. The input file is an Access database, which was exported from another repository. Now, I am using Import Manager to re-import this file into a new repository. The taxonomy and the allocation of attributes in this taxonomy are the same. However, when I import the data, some products have wrong attributes attached to them with wrong values. I already tried to do a two-step import (first product data, then attributes). The same problem here. In the Access file all records are correct. Any ideas?
    Best regards
    Christian
    Edited by: Christian Heuer on Mar 31, 2009 12:15 PM

    Hey gimnos,
    Thanks for the question. I understand you are experiencing issues importing a CD to iTunes for Windows. The following resources may provide a solution:
    iTunes 11 for Windows: Import songs from CDs
    http://support.apple.com/kb/PH12486
    iTunes for Windows: Additional troubleshooting tips for burning issues
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1374
    Thanks,
    Matt M.

  • Keychain Issue with Entourage SMTP password or port attribute

    I am posting this under Using OS X rather than Mail since I do not
    use Apple's Mail. The problem is the Microsoft Entourage or something
    may be sending bad information to the OS X keychain and this prevents me
    from sending mail to my ATT/Yahoo account. The workaround I have
    been using to send mail is use the OS X Keychain First Aid repair.
    After the repair Entourage will send the message one or two times then
    I get the following Keychain verification error note:
    Item “pop.att.yahoo.com” has unspecified value for port attribute
    Item “smtp.att.yahoo.com” has unspecified value for port attribute
    Problems were found; you should choose the Repair option to fix them
    Verification failed.
    The Repair option corrects the problem until the next message is
    sent. I have done everything I can think of to the Entourage v12.1.7
    settings and something is still not right.
    I am beginning to suspect a Keychain bug or error but have no idea
    how to get the correct attribute written to the keychain.
    Maybe someone could provide some terminal commands to the will
    help me write the correct password and port attribute to the keychain.
    I am open to any suggestions to clear being nagged every time I
    need to send a message to enter my password. The POP mail works
    fine. This seems to be an issue with the password that is required
    by the ATT/Yahoo smtp server.

    If you are sure your primary account is setup correct (per the above URLs), open
    the Applications/Utilities/Keychain Access.app and go to Keychain Access/Keychain
    First Aid and click on the Verify and Repair if necessary.
    FYI, Entourage will write errors to the keychain if you have the account setup wrong.
    My error (that cause the keychain errors) was I typed in the my ID and password in
    the smtp option. Check the box to use the received and do NOT type in the address.
    When you save the settings with nothing in the boxes, Entourage will do it for you
    and it will work.
    I don't know why but it will not work if you type in the info. Just follow the rules
    and it will work
    Try It!!
    Message was edited by: aRKay

  • BW 3.5 - Issue with formula variable with replacement path

    Dear experts,
    I'm facing an issue with formula variable with replacement path.
    Just to clarify, I know replacement paths is raising a lot of questions but I've been using this functionnality extensively in the past, both in 7.0 and 3.5, so I'm not looking for basic information about how to use it.
    I'm trying to setup a simple report that would show total values per plant of Purchase Order < 100 €
    To do so I've setup a calculated key figure as follow:
    VAR1 * ("PO value" < 100 ) * "PO value"
    VAR1 is a formula variable with replacement path on 'purchase order' and value attribute 'constant =1'.
    (The report has to show values summarized by plant but should not show the detail PO by PO, so I'm not looking at a solution based on condition)
    The report as characteristic "plant" in rows and my CKF in columns.
    Now let's take an example. I have 3 POs in Plant 1:
    PO1 -> 150€
    PO2 -> 90€
    PO3 -> 80€
    Because of the variable with replacement path, the result in my query should be:
    plant1 = 170 (even though characteristic "purchase order" is not in my rows, system should evaluate PO one by one and return values only for those two that are below 100).
    But the result coming is 320, which is wrong.
    I've done the same report on many other 3.5 systems and it worked perfectly, and I am not able to get proper support from SAP OSS who keep saying that this functionnality is not ready in 3.5 (although I've provided screenshot of this working on another 3.5 system!!! how frustrating...)
    They have also pointed to problems of Before and After aggregation but that has absolutely no impact. Once again, the scenario is working perfectly on other 3.5 systems with the same query design, so i'm sure it has nothing to do with Query Designer options.
    Would anyone have ever come to an equivalenet problem? I'm wondering whether the DB itself could not play a role in the variable with ref  characteristic 'constant =1' ...
    Any though is welcome!
    thanks

    Hi,
    The text variable is replaced when the exact date is clear for this key figure column according to the restriction.
    To achive this, please make sure that either the variable is directly restricted in the key figure selection, or that the date characteristic is in drilldown.
    Regards,
    Patricia

  • Issues with setting "Album Artist" in iTunes 9.2.5.1 on Windows 7

    I googled this for a while but haven't been able to find this issues mentioned anywhere else yet. Here's what's happening: I am importing CDs to iTunes 9.2.1.5 on Windows 7 Pro (64 Bit) using MP3 Encoder > Higher Quality. All is well except for a few CDs where I'd like to set an overall Album Artist. Example: Tony Bennett's Duets: An American Classic. When importing the CD it shows up under "Various Artists" since "Artist" is always Tony Bennett plus whoever he sings with. To make sure the album shows up under Tony Bennett in the library I click on the album and set "Album Artist" to Tony Bennett. That, however results in changing the "Artist" field as well now so all fields say Tony Bennett, which shouldn't happen, "artists" should stay unchanged. I tried this with several albums and the behavior is always the same.
    I also tried the back door by going into the actual folder of the album in Windows then change the MP3 details and populate "Album Artist" there for all tracks within the album. Once I re=open iTunes it registers the change only for the first track but not the rest. So I re-import the folder into iTunes and then it does take "Album Artist" and also leaves "Artist" unchanged but for some reason has now lots of numbers under "Comments". There seems to be a mismatch of the field attributes between iTunes and Windows for MP3 files (possibly other formats as well). Wondering if anyone else has observed this or if I am just missing some setting.

    FYI iTunes handling of ID3v2.4 tags seems to have some issues as well... Translating genres into their numeric codes for one thing. I'd recommend sticking with v2.3.
    I'm not exactly sure from your posts what you were seeing. Was the artist being changed in Get Info. after you'd set Album Artist, or was it changing elsewhere on screeen? iTunes 9(.1 I think) added an option *View > Column Browser > Use Album Artists*. Unfortunately this doesn't change the heading of the column so that you "see" it is now only listing album artists but that's what it does.
    There is also an occasional issue with the current build in that sometimes changes to Album Artist or Sort Album Artist fail to be reflected properly in the column browser until iTunes is closed and reopened.
    tt2

Maybe you are looking for