Issue with Monitoring of Subscription Orders

Dear Experts ,
Recently we are facing an issue in the monitoring of subscription orders.
We have scheduled the Monitoring ( Tcode : JKRM) in the background during the night time. Since last few days, our basis guy is complaining about creation of too many archive logs due to this. I am not sure whats to be done for this. Hence seeking your help in this. Please suggest what needs to be done for this so as to avoid creation of un necessary archive logs.
Regards,
Chintu

Hi Chintu ,
SAP has a standard functionality of creating the archive log in the system whenever any transaction is processed (Table Name : BALDAT).
In your case , there can be 2 reasons for creation of unnecessary archive logs :
1. There are lot of subscription orders which are in Error ( Check the monitoring log )
2. You are running transaction JKRM with Record Success Messages in Application Log check box On. If this check box is on at the time of monitoring , system will try to record each and every activity done for the individual subscription order ( Either Suspension , termination, closure or offer creation) though it is not in error.
Hence I will suggest you to check which of the above 2 reasons causing you trouble.
Please check the same and Get back to me.
Regards,
Nikhil

Similar Messages

Goods Issue with reference to Purchase Order

Hi MM Gurus,
Is there any settings to do Goods Issue with reference to Purchase order?
I want to capture the material price in purchase order during goods issue instead of standard price or moving average price.
Thanks in advance
Dinesh

Hello Dinesh,
Batch valuation is similar to split valuation. Here is the link on how batch valuation works.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/25/283db54f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/content.htm
Please check in sandbox environment before using.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Issue with exported playlist song order

I exported a playlist (with the playlist sorted on the manually arranged order, far left column) as a .xml file using iTunes 7.0.2. When a friend imports this playlist into his iTunes (7.0.1) the song order is incorrect (again with sorting done on the far left column). When I look at the exported XML file with a text editor the order of the song entries is also wrong in the XML file. Has anyone elsed noticed this problem?

Actually, I looked more closely in the text editor and the playlist order looks correct so there appears to be an issue with 7.0.1 (I guess).

Serious Issue with "third party subscriptions" through text messages.

Forgive me for perhaps sounding dramatic. After having this experience I nearly paid the fee to break my contract and quit on cell phones all together. If apple gets the iPhone to a point where no cellular carrier is neccessary I will be the first to join the party. I'm going to start trying this skype thing this weekend. Anyway, I digress, here's what happened. I get my bill from AT&T and there is a charge for download activity for $3.99. Not the end of the world but I call the number to find out what the charge is all about because I thought I had an unlimited data plan. Turns out AT&T calls it a third party subscription fee. I argued that if AT&T is charging it on my bill as far as I'm concerned I'm not concerned about the details, I hold AT&T responsable for what they put on my bill. According to AT&T's rep I recieved a text message asking me if I wished to subscribe to their service. I don't do the text thing so I never read any message like this. HERE'S THE KICKER - BECAUSE I DID NOT RESPOND TO THE TEXT TO SAY NO THANKS I WAS AUTOMATICLY ENTERED INTO AN ILLEGAL CONTRACT TO PAY $3.99 MONTHLY FOR A SERVICE I'M NOT EVEN AWARE OF. I was absolutly irate. The ramifications are astronomical. This means I could get a limitless unexpected bill. I look at it this way: If I had to write a letter, address an envelope, and lick a stamp every time I got an advertisement in my snailmailbox, I would never get out of the house and I would have to get on welfare to afford the stamps. To me there is an obvious legal precidence here. I realize that this has more to do with AT&T than Apple. I simply want to emplore Apple to save us from a world of disintigrating business ethic. Cellular providers have gotten completely out of control. When I feel like I need a lawyer just to call AT&T to discuss the inconsistency of my bill there is a serious problem. I feel like entering into a contract with a cellular provider endangers my financial stability in a fragile era. It just seems rediculous for a business to become so arogant that they can speak nonsense to a customer and we are put in a position to defend against such nonsense. Several of my friends have run into the same issue with text third party subscriptions. Last night at a dinner party three indicated that they finally had all the cellular provider crap they could take and they canceled their iPhone service and put it up on ebay. I love my iPhone, it is the most useful piece of technology I have ever had the pleasure to enjoy. That being said, I cannot justify, as a household provider with a family depending on me, taking the risk of financial ruin (a $3000+ cell phone bill could do just that) initiated by arogant buisiness practaces that resemble the oppression I have witnessed through 12 years of military service in places with an excess of sand. I think it is apauling. I believe the FCC and FTC need to be brought into this. I intend to submit formal complaints to both and would encourage others that feel like I do to do the same.

Not to diss those trying to be helpful, but the do not call list has nothing to do with spam TXT messages sent from a computer, which is where the OP's problem probably began.
If a third party sent this message and then signed the OP up for a service he did not want, this violates any number of consumer laws and can be addressed that way. It's unclear whether this is really an AT&T issue at all, absent any evidence that it is their message or their service. It sounds to me like the CS reps do not understand the problem and are giving the not-helpful generic answer about spam TXTs. A much better solution is to set the SMS filters using AT&T's web site.
Similar scams work on landlines, where you can accidentally end up getting a huge charge on your phone bill for something that has nothing to do with the carrier.
I'd call the state consumer protection department.
-dan

Issue with settlement of prod. order (KO88)

Hi Friends,
We are facing a issue while settlement of prod order using with tcode KO88.
In production Order, the distribution rule is created for account assignment category MAT (material) with settlement type PER (periodic settlement). We have added category CTR (cost center) with type PER to distribute percentages as 50% & 50%.
When we check the distribution rules in Production order system says its OK with-out error but when same is settled with KO88 system shows an error "Settlement type PER: Total percentage in distribution rules <> 100%".
Please help.
Regards,
Rohit

Hi Siva,
I looked into this OSS note and seems to be relevant for this error.
Thanks for the reply and i am closing this thread.
Regards,
Rohit

Issue with part delivery of orders containing payment card lines

We have a problem with part deliveries of orders containing payment card authorizations.
Our customers can buy items in our webshop paying with credit cards. The webshop is connected to our payment service provider who authorizes the complete amount of each order. The order data including authorization data is transferred from the webshop to our SAP ERP (ECC 5.0), where order documents are created, delivered and billed.
For example, an order was created with 3 items:
A for 5 u20AC
B for 10 u20AC
C for 20 u20AC
For now, we create 3 payment card authorization lines according to those items.
Line 1 5 u20AC
Line 2 10 u20AC
Line 3 20 u20AC
Item C is temporarily not available, item A and B can be delivered and billed. The system now takes authorization line 3 (as 5 u20AC + 10 u20AC = 15 u20AC < 20 u20AC) for the first billing. The authorized amount of this line is completely consumed.
When item C becomes available and is delivered and billed, the creation of the FI-document fails because there isn't enough authorization amount left.
The creation of 3 payment card authorization lines is not mandatory for our business, creating one line for the complete amount would be as fine. But how can we avoid the complete comsumption of the authorization line then? Or do you have any other suggestions / best practices how to deal with part deliveries of orders containing payment card authorizations?
Regards.
Hilka Kaminski-Nieswandt
Sabrina Förster

Hello fridaynights,
It would be worrisome to receive an email notification that we were unable to authorize your payment method, especially if the payment method appears to be fine on your end.
Generally speaking, when items ship separately from one order, we will authorize the full amount of the order when the order is placed. Authorizations may expire after a few business days, but as items ship individually, your card would be authorized and charged for the individual shipments.
Using the email address you registered with the forum, I was able to locate your order with the canceled amiibos. It would appear that we were unsuccessful in authorizing funds on the card on multiple occasions, and so the remaining amiibos were canceled. I apologize for any trouble or displeasure that this cancelation may cause you. I would encourage you to keep an eye on these amiibos on BestBuy.com for changes in their availability.
As it seems there was an issue with your My Best Buy MasterCard, I would encourage you to contact Citibank, the issuer of your My Best Buy MasterCard account, at 1-888-574-1301 for further inquiries into this authorization issue.
If you should need further assistance, please let me know.
Regards,
Tasha|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Issues with Monitoring Azure services with SCOM 2012 R2

Hi,
I'm trying to setup monitoring of our Azure subscriptions in a new installation of Operations Manager 2012 R2 which is running in-house as it is also monitoring our internal services. I've used the guide below:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/walterm/archive/2013/04/13/first-impressions-on-system-center-management-pack-for-windows-azure-fabric-preview-for-scom-2012-sp1.aspx
This has all worked OK and I've been able to add the subscription into OP Manager and it's found the cloud service, storage and VM's. However when I try to add the monitoring and I go to create this When I select the Add option in the Add Monitoring
Wizard and click the Search button to list the components (Cloud Service, Storage and VM's) nothing is found despite me having already selected the subscription.
Has anyone else experienced this or can offer any advice?
Many Thanks
Colin

Hi,
Which version of RDP client you are using for your client?
Does more user login at same period of time?
As you have commented that after sticking the user can’t able to login in RDCB server, here I can suggest you to check the setting of connection broker. Also you can check that you have place the proper location path of UPD while configuring in collection configuration
wizard. You can take a look at below article foe virtual desktop configuration.
Deploying Virtual Desktops with Windows Server 2012
Are you trying to use same UPD for different collection then also it might happens to occur your issue. The fact of UPD is User profile disks are for a single collection only. A user connecting to two different collections will have two separate profiles. If
you want to synchronize settings, refer to Microsoft User Experience Virtualization. Go through this article for more understanding related to UPD.
Working with User Profile Disks on Session-Based Desktop Deployments
Hope it helps!
Thanks.

BAPI to post a Goods issue with relation to Sales Order?

Hi Everyone,
After creating a delivery order, I need a BAPI to automatically post a goods issue for this DO.
I tried using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE but it returns the message 'Goods Movement not possible with mvmt type 601'.
Any advice?
Best Regards,
Junwen

Hi John,
My data are as follows:
GOODSMVT HEADER:
PSTNG_DATE: 30.09.2004
DOC_DATE: 30.09.2004
REF_DOC_NO: had tried 1014000359 or empty
GOODSMVT_CODE: 03
GOODSMVT_ITEM:
MATERIAL: HP0121002
PLAN: 1010
STGE: 10FG
BATCH: BATCH1
MOV: 601
CUSTOMER: 180017
ENTRY_QNT: 1
ENT_UOM: PC
ENT_UOM_ISO: PC
DELIV_NUMB: 1014000359
DELIV_ITEM: 000001
From your feedback, it is possible to use the BAPI to create a goods issue for movement type 601?
Best Regards,
Junwen

High Watermark issue with monitoring Service Manager 2012 R2

Hi,
Our customer has a Service Manager / Operations Manager 2012 R2 environment where SCOM will regularly generate an alarm related to High Watermark monitoring on the Service Manager data warehouse - not every day though. The alarm looks like this:
Value of 3559 is not higher than 3559
This value hasn't changed for weeks.
Having done a lot of searching we have found nothing but reference to the same recurring flow of information where people keep mentioning different values but there is no conclusion of what this might be caused by and how to solve it. The solutions
have become outdated anyway. Here is one example:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/systemcenter/en-US/889af8f3-cdf8-4d88-ae99-5dbe18d529ef/service-manager-2012-data-warehouse-high-watermark-monitor
The Service Manager Database Account in SCOM is our service account that has sysadmin in SQL. Basically, with regards to the security configuration, our customer should be covered.
To my knowledge agent-based and agentless monitoring have both been supported since SCSM 2012 SP1. Also, we have the latest management pack for Service Manager monitoring in SCOM, at the moment this should be
7.5.3079.0.
As mentioned above the value has not been changing for quite some time and nor has it in the database.
My questions are the following:
- Is there anyone that has found a solution in the meantime, especially with regards to R2?
- What is the purpose of High Watermark monitoring for the data warehouse? Why does this need to be monitored?
- We would like to understand the nature of this value better. Should it be higher each day compared to the day before?
- Could it just be overriden in SCOM?
Many thanks in advance!

Rather unexpectedly, the SCOM alarm disappeared overnight and when checking the workflow in the incident that was generated from the alarm, the incident got a Resolved status right before midnight at 23:59:58. We have a ConfigMgr connector that is scheduled
to run at 23:00 which we had disabled a day ago to check something else. But I don't think it had anything to do with this. As the alarm has disappeared from the SCOM console, we have also checked the registry values. Now, instead of "3559 3559 3559"
it says "3559 3559 3585". We have had the 3559 value since 18th July, and out of a sudden something must have been triggered, causing the value to increase. What was triggered and how, no idea... Not sure either what it means that only one of the
Three numbers have been updated with a new value. When talking about the DW jobs, using the SMlets we can see every day that, MPSync, DWMaintenance and the ETL jobs are working well. What we have had though for a longer time is that the cube processing
tends to have issues once a week, where processing won't finish and the cubes get hanging in a running state. We can fix that manually every time and often we don't even have to touch DWMaintenance or the ETL jobs, we don't need to go beyond manually
working with the cube processing jobs themselves. So it might not have an impact on the ETL jobs themselves. Occasionally we do find ourselves in a situation where we we need to play around in the SQL database and manually set the required value (can't
recall if it's 3, 6 or 7) cause we get an error in the DWMaintenance batch, but even though that's an occasional issue it's not constant and also something we can solve, and furthermore it's another known issue outside of the high watermark issue. So
we are a bit uncertain but can at least see that something works sometimes that sometimes increases the high watermark value :). In our case.

Issue with the Framework Purchase Order

Background: Using the Framework Purchase Order in the Plant Maintenance module for external operations:
When The Framework Purchase Order is used for external services procurement with service specifications, Purchase Requisitions are created based on the quantity of services requested against the Maintenance Order. Since I am using the service specifications, limits are not used in the Framework Order.
Problem:
The system does not do any check on the quantity that is requested for a service against that in the Framework Order. Hence the PRs get created linked to the Framework Order for whatever quantity requested in the Maintenance Order. Now the vendor submits the Service Entry sheets against those PRs released with respect to the Framework Order. That time the system does not allow the SES to be posted, because it exceeded the service quantity in the Framework order service specifications. In otherwords, there is no check against the framework order service quantity, when requisitions are released against the Framework order in the Maintenance Order. The check at the the time of SES is too late causing problems for mass creation of service entry sheets and also if external data entry is done for the SES by the vendor.
Is there any setting or configuration in SAP that helps to circumvent this issue? Any suggestion will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Nebu.

Hi
M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are not set to CHECK -> Value "NO".
If the check is not set to the standard delivered SAP what is the value in SU24 ? Has it been changed to CHECK > YES or DO NOT CHECK ?
I am sure you are aware that SAP does not deliver all objects coded in the programme under AUTHORITY-CHECK Statement in the SU24 Indicators with a CHECK > YES that are in transaction ME28. SAP only deliver a fraction of the values in the proposal as YES and the rest must be maintianed by the security team as they are discovered to be relevant to your organisations need of the particular functions within the transaction.This will then keep PFCG updated with all the CHECK YES objects the next time you add transaction ME28.
In other words all the objects listed in SU24 ( that are CHECK ) for ME28 will all be coded in the programme somewhere but it depends on which bits of the functionality within ME28 you are using that determines if they are called.

Irritated with service for subscription Order No. ...

Hi,
This is my first mail to skype, which is annoying me like hell, I purchased subscription for of 800 mins to india (paid for 12 months) on Aug 18th (Order No. [removed for privacy]) and from 2 days it is saying I don't have mins to call. What the hell to do with ?? I din't even used 200 mins...
I need this to be solved immideately on very urgent basis.
Naresh,
27 [removed for privacy]

Re <http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1619> I have enabled clear text authentication for wikid.
Now when I try the web interface to /ical/
Error from server: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'shortName' (8002)
— or if I try iCal 4.0.1 (1374):
iCal found the CalDAV "server imac01.centrim.freeman-centre.ac.uk",
but couldn't log in with the user name "gjp22".
Make sure that the user name and password you entered are
correct, then try again.
— or if I click Create to ignore that alert then use the iCal Server template:
The account information was not found. The resource
specified by "/principals/users/gjp22/" could not be found
on the server.

Issue with creation of sales order in CRM system

Hi Experts,
Here are the details of the process we followed
1.     We found a Function Module u201CBAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTIu201D which is used to create a sales order in CRM.
2.     We have set a Break point in the FM u201CCRM_ORDER_MAINTAINu201D and tried to create a sales order using the transaction u201CCRMD_ORDERu201D. For this the parameters we have given are
a.     sold-to-party
b.     ship-to-party
c.     quantity
d.     product
And after this we have saved the order and the order is saved and in the debug mode we have the parameters in u201CCRM_ORDER_MAINTAINu201D and we found all these     parameters in the FM.
3.     After this we have given all the parameters mentioned above in the FM u201CBAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTIu201D and still the order is not created, gave an error message saying that CRM_ORDER: Incorrect values in the interface object.
4.     We checked the CRM_ORDER badiu2019s interface and it is having only header guid to be given. We gave this header guid also in the FM u201CBAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTIu201D and then it gave a different error saying that : Document cannot be saved.
5.     Finally we are not able to know the parameters to be passed to the FM to create an order.
Any inputs will be highly appreciated.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Lakshman.

Hi Easwar,
Now i am able to create a sales order by passing the parameters to "BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI" and the parameters i am passing are Process_type in the ORDERADM_H, parner_fct (partner function), partner_no , Quantity and prod_ordered (product name) but after creation of sales order using my report program and if i see the sales order uisng transaction crmd_order (using transaction ID) or crmd_orderadm_h(using headerguid) or crm_order_index, only the PROCESS_TYPE is updated but the remaining parameters which i passed like QUANTITY,PRODUCT NAME,PARTNER NUMBER are not present in the sales order. I am providing the code which i have written for creation of the sales order. Can you please look into it and tell me where i might have went wrong??
*& Report ZCREATEORDER_TEST
REPORT ZCREATEORDER_TEST.
DATA : LV_HEADER_GUID TYPE GUID_32,
WA_HEADER            TYPE         BAPIBUS20001_HEADER_INS,
ITAB_HEADER          TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_HEADER_INS,
ITAB_CREATED_PROCESS TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_HEADER_INS,
ITAB_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_GUID_DIS,
ITAB_PARTNER        TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_PARTNER_INS,
lt_product_i TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_ITEM,
wa_product_i type BAPIBUS20001_ITEM,
lt_schedlin_i type standard table of BAPIBUS20001_SCHEDLIN,
wa_schedlin_i type BAPIBUS20001_SCHEDLIN,
ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS TYPE TABLE OF bapibus20001_input_fields,
ls_inputfields TYPE bapibus20001_input_fields,
WA_PARTNER          TYPE BAPIBUS20001_PARTNER_INS,
ITAB_RETURN          TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIRET2,
WA_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE LIKE LINE OF ITAB_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE,
           "To store the Objects to be saved.
WA_CREATED_PROCESS LIKE LINE OF ITAB_CREATED_PROCESS,
ITAB_SAVED_OBJECTS   TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BAPIBUS20001_OBJECT_ID,
WA_SAVED_OBJECTS    LIKE LINE OF ITAB_SAVED_OBJECTS,
GC_X type c.
gc_x = 'x'.
CALL FUNCTION 'GUID_CREATE'
IMPORTING
    ev_guid_32 = lv_header_guid.
CLEAR : WA_HEADER.
Passing the respective values from the Header table to internal table.
WA_HEADER-GUID          = LV_HEADER_GUID.
WA_HEADER-PROCESS_TYPE = 'ZTA'.
APPEND WA_HEADER TO ITAB_HEADER.
*Appending the values to the ITAB_HEADER.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'ORDERADM_H'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'PROCESS_TYPE'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
*ls_inputfields-ref_handle = '0000000000'.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'ORDERADM_H'.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'MODE'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'ORDERADM_H'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'GUID'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
CHANGES MADE
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'LOGICAL_KEY'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'MODE'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN_I'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'GUID'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
   ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN_I'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'QUANTITY'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
   ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'SCHEDLIN_I'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'MODE'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
CHANGES MADE
WA_PARTNER-REF_GUID = LV_HEADER_GUID.
WA_PARTNER-REF_KIND = 'A'.
giving the partner function and partner no 000000038 for slod to party
WA_PARTNER-PARTNER_FCT = '00000038'.
WA_PARTNER-PARTNER_NO = '10017'.
APPEND WA_PARTNER TO ITAB_PARTNER.
*"ADDING VALUES for the product
wa_product_i-header        = lv_header_guid.
wa_product_i-handle        = '0000000001'.
wa_product_i-ordered_prod = '12000014'.
wa_product_i-mode          = 'A'.
APPEND wa_product_i TO lt_product_i.
*"ADDING VALUES for quantity
wa_schedlin_i-quantity   = 30.
wa_schedlin_i-handle = 1.
APPEND wa_schedlin_i TO lt_schedlin_i.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'PARTNER'.
*ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'REF_GUID'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'PARTNER'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'PARTNER_FCT'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
ls_inputfields-ref_guid = LV_HEADER_GUID.
ls_inputfields-REF_KIND = 'A'.
ls_inputfields-objectname = 'PARTNER'.
ls_inputfields-logical_key = ' '.
ls_inputfields-fieldname = 'PARTNER_NO'.
APPEND ls_inputfields TO ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI'
TABLES
    HEADER          = ITAB_HEADER
    ITEM            = lt_product_i
    RETURN          = ITAB_RETURN
    PARTNER         = ITAB_PARTNER
    INPUT_FIELDS    = ITAB_INPUT_FIELDS
    CREATED_PROCESS = itab_created_process
    SCHEDULELINE    = lt_schedlin_i.
READ TABLE ITAB_CREATED_PROCESS INTO WA_CREATED_PROCESS WITH KEY GUID = LV_HEADER_GUID BINARY SEARCH.
WA_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE-GUID = WA_CREATED_PROCESS-GUID.
Appending the Guid of the contract to be saved to the internal table
APPEND WA_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE TO ITAB_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_SAVE'
EXPORTING
    update_task_local = space
    save_frame_log    = GC_X
TABLES
    objects_to_save   = itab_objects_to_save
    saved_objects     = itab_saved_objects
    return            = itab_return.
Calling the Standard BAPI to Commit the transcation.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
I have debugged the above code, all the values are passing are passing to the FM "'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI'" and these passed to the CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN and then to CRM_ORDER_READ which are called inside the "'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI'". Finally the sales order is created but not able to see all the values that i am passing except PROCESS_TYPE.
Thanks a lot in Advance,
Lakshman.

Issue with service line purchase orders.

Hi Experts,
    We have recently upgraded to following pack levels -
System                                 Pack level
ECC 6.0          17, EHP4 Stack 7
SRM 5.0          17
There is an issue around purchase order change. If an existing PO is edited and a new line is added to the PO it appears fine in SRM system. But on replicating to backend, we see that the newly added line has been duplicated i.e. appears twice thereby reflecting incorrect value.
This is happening for Service line items. Has anyone had similar issue at their end ? I tried to search SAP Notes but found nothing relevant to our issue.
Any pointers / suggestions would be much appreciated.
Thanks
RB

Hi
Before going to SAP, Check the data being passed to ECC from SRM. Activate the BAPI_PO_CREATE1 for creating data in test directory instead of posting the documnet. then check the data in BAPI Segments, if the data is proper there then there is some problem in ECC 6 ehp 4 which need to be highlighted to SAP, otherwise its a problem in sending the data from SRM to ECC.
OSS Note for creating test data is - Note 539978 - Automatic generation of BAPI test data directory
Regards
Virender Singh

Issue with ME28 - Release Purchase Order

Dear All,
One of our user is unable to release a purchase order through Transaction code ME28.
The role is assigned only with the Transaction Code ME28 with the correct Release code and Group.
We have tested from our end and see that the Auth Objects M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are missing based on SU53. When we have added back it worked.
When i check in Su24 the Auth Obj M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are not set to CHECK -> Value "NO".
I dont understand how this Transaction is working, when the behaviour of the Transaction ME28 is to release the purchase order why is the system asking for additional Auth Objects.
please advice.
Regards

Hi
M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are not set to CHECK -> Value "NO".
If the check is not set to the standard delivered SAP what is the value in SU24 ? Has it been changed to CHECK > YES or DO NOT CHECK ?
I am sure you are aware that SAP does not deliver all objects coded in the programme under AUTHORITY-CHECK Statement in the SU24 Indicators with a CHECK > YES that are in transaction ME28. SAP only deliver a fraction of the values in the proposal as YES and the rest must be maintianed by the security team as they are discovered to be relevant to your organisations need of the particular functions within the transaction.This will then keep PFCG updated with all the CHECK YES objects the next time you add transaction ME28.
In other words all the objects listed in SU24 ( that are CHECK ) for ME28 will all be coded in the programme somewhere but it depends on which bits of the functionality within ME28 you are using that determines if they are called.

Grant issue with Monitoring Sessions

I've searched high and low for the answer to this. I get an error when trying to Monitor Sessions (table/view don't exist) and that I need select grants on these objects:
V$SESSION to beadiadbo, V$PROCESS, V$SESS_IO, V$SESSION_WAIT, V$SESSION_EVENT, V$ACCESS, V$SESSSTAT, V$STATNAME, V$OPEN_CURSOR, V$SQL, V$LOCK, V$SESSION_LONGOPS, SYS.V_$TRANSACTION, SYS.V_$ROLLNAME, V$SQLTEST_WITH_NEWLINES
I've given SELECT grant to the user, but still get the error. Am I missing any other privileges?
Much appreciated,
Adam

Hi Adam,
According to the following forum search hit (monitor AND sessions), try GRANT SELECT ANY DICTIONARY:
Monitor Sessions
MONITOR SESSIONS on a user with just CONNECT, RESOURCE role grants will fail. Adding SELECT ANY DICTIONARY fixes it.
Getting any finer grained than that gets hairy, e.g., doing a sql trace on your session to see which dictionary views get referenced.
Regards,
Gary Graham
SQL Developer Team

Issue with Monitoring of Subscription Orders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for