Items does not match schedule line

Item does not match schedule line (program error) - message V1427 getting while accessing the Sales Order via VA02/VA03.
While we see in table VBAP we can see all the line items except the Item number 10 for the order. However, in the table VBEP, we see 5 line items for the Sales Order.
It is not allowing us to enter the Sales Order. Kindly help.
Thanks in advance.
Message was edited by:
Praveen Kumar

Hello,
we've got the same problem.
Because of some changes in an SD-Userexit the problems have been generated.
In our case the SAP-notes can't help to solve the problem with VBAP/VBEP.
I wrote an report which check and delete the excessive positions of both tables.
Hope it helps.

Similar Messages

Item does not match schedule line (program error)

Dear Experts,
I Transaction VA02/VA03 when i put Sales order number and try to get in to the system system through error and terminate the transaction
ERROR is "Item does not match schedule line (program error)" with Message no. V1427
when i check Table level and analyse thr Debuging i found that
Table VBAP line item 10 is missing and table VBEP line item 10 is there due to this miss match its shows above error
Question
Why and How it happen and how to fix this issue???
Best Regards
hanumant

Check Note 442831 - V1427: Item does not match schedule line (program error)
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Item does not match schedule line (program error) in sap

Dear Expert.
Greetings!
We are currently facing with this error (V1 427 item does not match schedule line (program error) in sap), when we open the sales order(VA02/03).
The error is occurring due inconsistency on the database tables, some Item is in table VBEP, but it is missing from table VBAP. This is what is causing the error message.
I checked various related notes - 442831 , 401463 , 389687 etc . These are quite old notes and I am in release ECC 6.0 .
Report SD_CONSISTENT_CHECK_EXT and SD_CONSISTENT_CHECK are already available.
Bapi BAPI_SD_SALES is also active.
Please let me know if anybody has any idea on the same.
regards
Praveen

Hi,
Refer the KBA: 1464620 - Error V1427: Item does not match schedule line which explains the reason and the solution for the issue.
Regards,
AKPT

Item does not match schdule line ( program error ) message no . V1427

*Item does not match schdule line ( program error ) message no . V1427 .* This is the message I am getting when I am trying to display a quotation through VA23 . From here system exits the transaction .
As per my observation , when I compared VBAP and VBEP tables, there are 2 items in VBEP table with schedule lines but the same items are not present in VBAP table. User says he tried to delete these items because there is no quanity , Inspite of that these items appear in VBEP table .
The document is a reservation document where in schedule line category does TOR and availability check.
I checked various related notes - 442831 , 401463 , 389687 etc . These are quite old notes and I am in release ECC 5.0 .
What is the best way as this doc has nearly 30 items and nearly all of them have quanity confirmed .
Please provide your valuble inputs ...
Regards
Raghav..

Nitin,
Below are the steps to check
Transaction SE18
Definition name: BADI_SD_SALES
Menu: Implementation -> Overview
double-click on implementation: IM_CORE_CHECK
Now you will get an overview on the methods.
check whether implementation IM_CORE_CHECK is active or not.
If not Press the change button and activate
looking at the your system pack level this should be active. If it is active then the inconsistency must be modified directly at database level through Z report.
Ramesh

Reschedule does not update schedule line after upgrade

Dear All,
After upgrade to ECC6.0, the reschedule does not update EKET any more but it update ekpo as usual.I debugged it , before the function module SD_BACKORDER_**_SAVE everything is ok.
I also checked the sap note for the new field in T161V.But When I choose other option about customzing. eket are updated every time when the reschdule program run.This will lead double delivery.
Do you have any suggestion？
Edited by: Edward on Feb 23, 2010 9:03 PM

Hi,
On the initial screen of V_V2
Remove tickmark of SIMULATION, Then it will update schedule lines in sales document
Kapil

Music Organization - Number of items does not match

This may be more of an iTunes question but since it's music on my iPhone, I'll try here.
When I connect the phone to iTunes, there are several sub headings/folders below the device name: Music, Movies, TV Shows, Audiobooks, and my iPhone playlist.
When I compare the playlist on the phone against the playlist in iTunes, the number of items matches. 353 items on the phone, 353 items in iTunes.
When I click on the Music subheading for the iPhone, I see 350 items. There are 3 items in the TV Show subheading on the iPhone. So does iTunes count the TV Shows as part of the Music heading?
Obviously not a big deal but I have a similar problem with iTunes and my iPod only with about 7000 items and that's what driving me crazy.
Thanks for any advice.

I think the oddity is coming from you mixing music and TV shows in the same playlist. When I do this in iTunes, it asks me if I really want to do this, as most people keep seperate play lists.
You obviously can sync TV shows that way, or you can go under the TV shows (once the iPhone is connected) and select what TV shows to sync. Keeps a nice clean separation.

FAGLB03 Total does not match Drilldown total

Hi Everyone,
We are a Candian Company, so when I run FAGLB03 for a certain account in a US Company Code, and change the view to Document Currency (Canadian), I get a total equal to $0.00.
However, when I drill down on that total, the line item display is reporting a significant balance. I have changed my layout to include the different currencies - nothing matches the total of $0.00.
Im just concerned the FAGLB03 total on the main screen, does not match the line item total...which one is correct, and
why would this be happening?
Thanks in advance,
Rob

Dear
Please check the thread Re: FAGLB03 peroid balance not tallying with line items within
Regards

Sales Analysis report does not match Cost of Sales Account

My client is running SAP B1 8.81 PL 6. He has set all items to standard costing method. He has discovered that the difference between the Sales Amount and the Gross Profit amount on the Sales Analysis report, which should equal the Cost of Sales for the Items, does not match the Cost of Sales G/L account on the P&L report. If you look at a sample of rows, the above difference divided by the quantity equals the standard cost of the item. There are no manual journal entries that affect the COS account for the posting period that is being analyzed. I cannot see any mathmatical difference or problem with the above analysis, nor can I find the problem. There is about an $85K difference between the reports. The Sales Amount on the Sales Analysis report matches the revenue account on the P&L to the penny. Has anyone ever compared these 2 reports? Thank you for your help.
Bill Turek

If you right click on an Invoice and choose "Gross Profit" it will give you a setting on how you want to calculate the Gross Profit for that invoice.
In the accounting point of view the "Base Price" should be "Item Cost" so that the Gross Profit will be (Net Selling Price - Item Cost = Gross Profit). This will give you the same Gross Profit amount between P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
However, SAP B1 gives the user the ability to select a different base price other than the Item Cost.
This gives the user the flexibility for the Sales Report. Example (Net Sales Price - Vendor Sales Price = Gross Profit). People do this sometimes because the item's cost fluctuates if you use FIFO or average cost and they want a uniform cost to calculate their Gross Profit.
In summary if the Base Price is not set to "Item Cost" then there will be difference in the Gross Profit between the P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
See screenshot:
-Eric Alo-
B1 Financial Consultant

MRP does not creates Shcedule Line

I have a valid scheduling agreement LPA in place. Scheduling Agreement is approved and released status.
I have source list also maintained for same scheduling agreement with long validity and MRP indicator as 2 - Create Schedule line automatically.
I am running MRP using following parameters in MD02.
Processing key          NETCH               Net Change in Total Horizon
Create purchase req.    3                   Planned orders
Delivery schedules      3                   Schedule lines
Create MRP list         1                   MRP list
Planning mode           3                   Delete and recreate planning data
Scheduling              2                   Lead Time Scheduling and Capacity Planni
Even schedule line and other parameters maintained properly, MRP creates planned order and does not creates Schedule Line automatically. Material Master is maintained MRP Type PD, Lot Size as Replenishment to maximum stock level, Safety stock, No strategy and availability on.
What I am doing wrong? With same setting in other system it is working perfectly fine.
Any feedback appreciated.
Thanks
PP

Hi
Check whether the Agreement Open Target value .
If the target quantity was completed . so system will not create the Schedule lines for the material
2. If you mainatian the open period in the smk.
so system will create the planned order instead of schedule agreement. check

0BBP_TD_SC_1 Header GUID in item record does not match Header GUID

Hi all,
We are testing shopping cart (Line Item) extractor (0BBP_TD_SC_1) and we are finding that for some shopping carts, the Header GUID in the item record does not match GUID in the header record.
The item record, however, has a field called 'DOC GUID' which matches the header GUID.
Also, Header and Item GUID in the item record are identical.
Is this how the extractor is supposed to work?
Any suggestions will be appreciated, and points will be assigned.
Edited by: RDA on Mar 20, 2009 10:34 PM

Isn't it in BUP_VENDOR_ID?

Location entered does not match warehouse location of item

Hello Experts,
I am creating delivery through object.but I am facing this error 'Location entered does not match warehouse location of item'
This is my code .
   SAPbobsCOM.Documents oDelivery;
                                    oDelivery = clsAddOn.LDNA_Company.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oDeliveryNotes);
                                    ldna_Rec = clsAddOn.LDNA_Company.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.BoRecordset);
                                    string saleordernumber = oMat.Columns.Item("V2").Cells.Item(i).Specific.Value;
                                    string[] ret = GetBinCode.Split('-');
                                    string whs = ret[0];
                                    oDelivery.Lines.BaseEntry = Convert.ToInt16(saleordernumber);
                                    oDelivery.Lines.BaseType = 17;
                                    oDelivery.Lines.ItemCode = oMat.Columns.Item("V7").Cells.Item(i).Specific.Value;
                                    oDelivery.Lines.ItemDescription = oMat.Columns.Item("V6").Cells.Item(i).Specific.Value;
                                    oDelivery.Lines.BaseLine = lineno;
                                    oDelivery.Lines.Quantity = qty;
                                    oDelivery.Lines.WarehouseCode = whs;
                                    oDelivery.Lines.UserFields.Fields.Item("U_TotBird").Value = totalbird;
                                  // code for batch
                                    SAPbobsCOM.Items oItemD;
                                    oItemD = clsAddOn.LDNA_Company.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oItems);
                                    string it = oMat.Columns.Item("V7").Cells.Item(i).Specific.Value;
                                    oItemD.GetByKey(it);
                                    if (oItemD.ManageBatchNumbers == SAPbobsCOM.BoYesNoEnum.tYES)
                                        ldna_Rec = clsAddOn.LDNA_Company.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.BoRecordset);
                                        string si = oMat.Columns.Item("V7").Cells.Item(i).Specific.Value;
                                        string strBatch = "select DistNumber from OBTN where ItemCode ='" + it + "' ";
                                        ldna_Rec.DoQuery(strBatch);
                                        while (!ldna_Rec.EoF)
                                            string BatchNo = ldna_Rec.Fields.Item("DistNumber").Value;
                                            if ( BatchNo == mainbatch)
                                               oDelivery.Lines.BinAllocations.SerialAndBatchNumbersBaseLine = 0;
                                                oDelivery.Lines.BatchNumbers.BatchNumber = mainbatch;
                                                oDelivery.Lines.BatchNumbers.Quantity = totalbird;
                                                oDelivery.Lines.BatchNumbers.Add();
                                            ldna_Rec.MoveNext();
                                    //code for bin allocation
                                    ldna_Rec = clsAddOn.LDNA_Company.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.BoRecordset);
                                    string strQuerybinD = "select AbsEntry from OBIN where BinCode='" + GetBinCode + "'";
                                    ldna_Rec.DoQuery(strQuerybinD);
                                    int binAbsD = ldna_Rec.Fields.Item("AbsEntry").Value;
                                    oDelivery.Lines.BinAllocations.BinAbsEntry = binAbsD;
                                    SAPbobsCOM.DocumentLinesBinAllocations binD = oDelivery.Lines.BinAllocations;
                                    binD.SerialAndBatchNumbersBaseLine =0;
                                    binD.BinAbsEntry = binAbsD;
                                    binD.Quantity = totalbird;
                                    if (oDelivery.Add() == 0)
                                        clsAddOn.LDNA_Application.StatusBar.SetText("Delivery challan created Sucessfully.", SAPbouiCOM.BoMessageTime.bmt_Medium, SAPbouiCOM.BoStatusBarMessageType.smt_Success);
                                    else
                                        BubbleEvent = false;
                                        clsAddOn.LDNA_Application.StatusBar.SetText(clsAddOn.LDNA_Company.GetLastErrorDescription(), SAPbouiCOM.BoMessageTime.bmt_Medium, SAPbouiCOM.BoStatusBarMessageType.smt_Error);
                                        return;
Please help me
Regards,
Pritam

Hi George,
I have another question for you. I have a column that is titled "City" Intitally I wanted to be able to enter in the name of the city into one field and it auto populate the other fields with the same name. Since I'm new to PDF forms I thought I would just copy and paste the same field multiple times so once I enter in the name in the first field it would fill in the rest of the fields with the same name. This works, but in some cases I need one or two of the fields to be different and allow me to edit the name. As you can expect every time I edit one field it changes the name for all the fields. So my question is; Is there a way to have the column auto populate the same name that enter in the first field, but allow me to change the fields below if I need to?
Here is a rough idea of what I'm trying to do
City
CityRow1
CityRow2
CityRow3
CityRow4
This is what I had
City
CityRow1 - Kansas City
CityRow1 - Kansas City
CityRow1 - Kansas City
CityRow1 - Kansas City
I would like the form to initially auto populate the city to save time, but if I have an instance where its in a different city I need to be able to change the value of only that particular field.
City
CityRow1 - Kansas City
CityRow2 - Kansas City
CityRow3 - Lawrence
CityRow4 - Kansas City
Again I appreciate all you help thus for. Thanks again!

How to avoid output file and error lines when condition does not match

Hi Experts
A customer want to send purchase order files to several vendors and each vendor has their own requirement to content and file format. I have prepared scenarios for each vendor and a template is (conditionally) called when CardCode matches. It works fine, - PO file is generated when CardCode matches, but error lines are written to SAP B1 Control Center each time CardCode does not match the one defined in a scenario (100 or more times per day). Problem is that these error lines does not get automatic deleted. Conditional processing are made in this way:
Result Message in SAP B1 Control Center when CardCode does not match:
I tried to avoid an error line in SAP B1 Control Center when CardCode does not match in this way:
Then no error lines are written to SAP B1 Control Center, but an output file is generated each time (order file when CardCode matches and an empty file when CardCode does not match).
Any suggestions on how to avoid both errors types (error lines in SAP B1 Control Center and empty output files)?
Or - can lines in SAP B1 Control Center be automatic deleted?
Regards
Steen

Hi Steen,
using <b1im_skip> should be the right approach, if you're working with B1 OUTBOUND.
Following extract form the B1i help describes the usage to skip the outbound processing:
1.1 Skipping Outbound Processing
If you do not want to hand over the message to the receiver system, the scenario step can create a special tag that indicates to generic processing in the integration framework to skip the message processing.
Add the following to the final transformation atom (atom0):
<b1im_skip xmlns= ”” info=”my info” msglog=”true” msgout="yes">
If the integration framework skips the message, it puts the message log information to the Filtered section, if the message log is switched on. The result message contains the Message skipped by vBIU logic information.
info
To display an individual message, define it using the info attribute.
msglog
If you want to avoid an entry in the message log, introduce the msglog attribute and set it to false.
msgout
To display the skip information in the Success section of the message log, use the msgout attribute and set it to yes.
In case you don't want any MsgLogEntry in case of a skipped message, please enter the following in final atom0:
<xsl:template name="transform">
<xsl:attribute name="pltype">xml</xsl:attribute>
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="$msg/BOM/BO/Documents/row/CardCode='C20000'">
<xsl:call-template name="transform2"/>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise>
<b1im_skip info="skipped" msglog="false"/>
</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
</xsl:template>
Best regards
Bastian

Line number does not match in opteron assembly

Hi,
I have made an assembly for one of my files on Opteron but the problem i face is the line numbers shown by it does not match my code.
I am getting a core in the same file and i am able to find the function name but the line numbers and offsets are not displayed in the assembly correctly.
So i am not able to find the line number where the problem is.
The following are the details:
bash > uname -a
SunOS sha-x86-view2 5.10 Generic_Patch i86pc i386 i86pc
and i have given -S -xs command line options while making assembly.
Can some one help me with that?

Thanks for your reply Jolly.
When I first activated the broadband I had the filter plugged into the front (centre) socket on the master socket and the line was connecting at approx 1.5 Mb. About two weeks ago I plugged the filter directly into the test socket and I got the increased connection rate as detailed above. I left the router on and everything connected for about 10 days but had no improvement in line profile. Could it be that my connection rate is so marginal on activating the 1.5 Mb line profile that the equipment at the exchange isn't detecting the increased (well kind of!) speed?
The reason I was only connected for 17 min before posting that message was because I decided to restart the router to confirm that I was still connecting at that rate.
I tried speaking to someone in Dehli about this but got absolutely nowhere........

Error : Contract does not match customer and item information[OSCI.ManufSN]

I need to add Service Call from Service Contract through DIAPI. "Mfr. Serial no" is set as "Unique serial no by" in system general settings.
Creating two Customer Equipment Card from the cfl provided on Service Contract in Item Tab and Internal serial is blank in created Cutomer Equipment Card.
One is terminated and other is active have the same ItemCode but different customers then while adding Service Contract I am paraller generating service call through DIAPI but the system is throughing error - "Contract does not match customer and item information [OSCL.IntrnalSN]"
Thanks
deepak gaur

HI,
Service Contract can be for a specific customer
The contract type cound be (Coverage):
1. including all items (Type Customer) in this case the dates of the coverage is defined in the head!
2. Including specific serial numbers
3. Including item groups
The status every case should have to be Enabled/Approved for valid contract (OCRT.Status = 'A').
In case of Do not forget to set the valid from and valid to dates to define in the system the coverage. (header and items tab from/to dates)
Now, If you create service all, the system will use the first possible Service Contract. IF you have more: you have to select the contract manually.
Ex:
1. One for customer including all items
2. One for a specific serial number
Best Regadrs,
János

MIRO-Account type/account for invoice reference does not match item-F5350

Hi gurus
please help
When I tried to cancel an MIRO invoice, it is giving me the error
Account type/account for invoice reference does not match item". "F5350 "
Please advise.
thanks
MSJ

Hello,
This seems to be a configuration issue or you might be entering the wrong details.
This is a standard transaction. IF you feel there is nothing wrong, then search for OSS notes on http://service.sap.com to see if there is a solution to this problem.
cheers,
sushil joshi

Items does not match schedule line

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for