KOB1 to include Std Cost, Actual cost......

Morning Dear Friends,
Need your help in the enhancement
Enhancement to existing SAP report, t-code:KOB1 to include standard cost, std quantity, actual cost, actual quantity by part details and assembly part number in SE & SR document type.
Kndly suggest if you have any ideas
Thanks

why not use the summarization transactions
KKBC_HOE or KKR0 (preceded by KKRV & KKRC)

Similar Messages

How to include ED in Std.cost estimate

Dear all
My client want to add ED to Std. cost estimate in receiving plant(Depot). I have acheived this by way of additive cost estimate manually. but my client wants that system could pick up the Ed from SD where ED is maintained SKU wise.
At recieving plant(Depot) the std.cost estimate is like this
Std cost from production Plant
ED from SD
Freight ( certain % on ( St.cost+ED)
Std cost at depot
Is it possible to get above scenerio?
Pl help me out
Regards
SPSankaram

HI
Standard formula for workcenter costing is SAP008 , you have to specify in the costing and capacity tab , whereas for scheduling specify SAP004
then try creating the order
regards
thyagarajan

Change in FG/SFG valuation system from STD cost MAP

As of now we use Std cost for valuation of FG/SFG and we would like to switchover to MAP for following reasons:
1.We donu2019t see any significant benefit from present costing system. Std costing updation, monthly CO closing, periodical revision of STD cost is not really justifying any benefits compared to the overall efforts put in for above activities.
2.KE 30 reports fail to give correct productwise contribution status as system loads all variance to quantity sold during the PERIOD( e.g If production is 1000 qty, sales 200 qty- , then system will load the variance of entire 1000 qty to sales qty of 200). This is misleading. It is not possible to sale all produced qty in same period in our case.
3.SFGs being produced in one plant trfd to another for FG production. To produce final product X, SFG A is needed, to produce A, SFG B required, to produce B, SFG C required. This is discrete mfg process and and SFG are produced in different plants under same co code. So, we are not able get contribution report of product X as component SFG A it self contains OH/activity cost.( We want to calculate contribution company as a whole i.e Selling price minus material cost( actually bought out materials and not SFG).
We donu2019t want to go for material ledger, considering the manufacturing complexity. Now, we want to change price control of all FG/SFGs fromu201DSu201D to u201CVu201D on cut-off date after making stock NIL
Kindly give us your expert advise on this approach. What are the challenges we will face by doing so.? Is there any company done this type of changes?
MBS

Hi MBS
1. ML is the right and only solution for your expectations
2. Whether you adopt V or S - CO CLosing is what you cant avoid... You will still need to do the whole CO cycle whether you have V or S
3. Having price control V for In House Mfd materials will damage the inventory valuation forever... Refer Note 81682 - Pr.contr.V for semi-finished and finished, which explains this in detail
What you want is Actual Costing, which can only be delivered by ML
What you want to avoid is monthly CO Closing - Which you really cant avoid
If you still go with V - May be in future you would realise that S was better as suggested by SAP in the above note...
You can take up an enhancement with your ABAP team to develop the kind of reports you want... however, thats not going to be easy... Its gonna take very long to stabilize, even if achieved
br, Ajay M

How to Run a Cost Estimate with Budgeted Values parallel to the Std Cost Estiamte

Hi Experts,
My client want to run a parallel cost estimate with Budgeted values for each type of cost in a similar process like standard cost estimate(currently only Std business run only the std. cost estimate). Below will be provided to run the said cost estimate.
     1. Budgeted Cost for cost elements against each cost center
     2. Re-posting/distribution will be required run to allocate and apportion the cost from service cost centers to Production cost centers
     3. All Planned(future) Material Cost will be provided. (note that the valuation strategy of costing variant of standard cost estimate has below sequence
     4. Budgeted activity quantities will be provided. (Cost and activity qty for Kp06 and Kp26)
Based on the above data business need to run a cost estimate with budgeted values parallel to the standard cost estimate(based on planned values), which will be compared with actual then Budget at each months.
Simply an alternative cost estimate with budgeted values for a given period for all materials.
Kindly advice the possibility of such a cost estimate in the system and if possible pls. mentioned the Process in order and configuration steps for the same.
Thanks in advance.
Aziz

Hi..
You can define costing variants which have valuation variant for budgeted values parallel to the standard cost estimate in Customizing for Product Cost Controlling.
You can define target cost versions using above costing variants under the customizing transaction OKV6 as below picture.
When you calculate variances, you can check “all target cost version” flag to calculate variances for all target cost versions in the controlling area as below picture.
You can analysis the difference between actual cost and several budget cost using target cost version as below picture.

Reg:Not able to run Std-Costing

Hi Team,
Finished product has been already run with Cost Collector & Std-Costing, but the respective BOM against said code has been changed (item has been added to BOM). After this, Standard Costing & Cost Collector is not able to run.
Can you pls suggest me.
With Regards,
P.Arunkumar.

Dear Arunkumar,
I think you are working with REM scenario.
Standard Cost estimate can be carried out only once for any material for a period.
Assuming that after taking if your BOM is getting Changed say For Eg: One more new component is
added in the BOM of a Finished Product,then in that case goto the product Cost collector of the Finished
product and click on Change mode Button (Shift + F6) and then click on The Cost button (Shift +F1) and
then save the datas.
Now while doing the confirmation in MFBF,you can see the latest BOM components getting
posted.
So no need to carryout eh cost estimate once again,so till this period that particular component will be
having only the actual value in KKF6N.So during the next period take the cost rollup and so that the
component will be having Planned as well as actual values.
Check & Revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Calculated Std cost est vs Material Master Std cost price

Hi all,
Why will a calculated std cost est not be equal to my standard price in my costing 2 view on the material master? For ex:
I calc a price for material 1 = R11.50
The price in the material master (MBEW-STPRS) is R10.80.
I can see that the difference is some activities for one of the operations in my production process, but it does not show on my material master.
Can anyone suggest a solution?
Thanks,
Hein

The planned price can be copied from CO-PC, or entered manually depending on your settings in CO. If you open the standard material cost and release it the two price of planning price and standard price will be same.
As to the price of PO that is another price, actual cost happened.
FYI.
If no marked standard cost estimate exists, you can enter a price in this field manually. This makes it possible for the system to find a price when costing an assembly via the valuation strategy, even if no standard cost estimate with status KA (correct) exists for a BOM material (such as a raw material or semifinished product).
If you subsequently create and flag a cost estimate for this material, the results of this cost estimate are adopted as the future planned price, and the manual entry overwritten. It can then no longer be changed. Therefore, you are recommended to use the Planned price 1, Planned price 2, and Planned price 3 fields to maintain the planned prices of material components and to define them in the valuation strategy.

Std cost strategy in Cutover

Hello,
I have a query related to Std costing in cutover period.
If client doents have any costing system in legasy system prior to SAP golive. If there is any stock in cutover and that is as per price control S then how the strategy to be applied in cutiver for std costing. If we calculated cost as per BOM and routing in cotover then ther are chances that the value of stock would be different than the legacy system stock value, and becasue of different price the inventory value in legacy system and SAP would be with huge different. so request you to please inform how the std cost is trated in cutover period.
Reg,
Harry

Hello Harry,
You would need to ascertain the basis on which the cost is being carried out in the existing system and then you need to take appropriate steps and follow the correct sequence to arrive at the cost at which the stock is carried in the legacy system. Now the question arises that whether the legacy system has some form of estimate for the finished and the semi finished goods or they are valuating the same at some standard price which does not necessarily correspond to the prices of the RMs and the activity types.
Scenario 1 : Material valuation is based on cost estimates
In this case what I mean is that the value of the FG & SFG would be based on the prices of the RMs and activity. In this case the first step would be to update the RM and stores prices with the prices at which they are being carried in the inventory. It should also be kept in mind that the pre-golive BOM and Routing should be same as post golive. The next step would be creation of cost estimate for FG and SFG that would correspond to the value at which they are being carried in the legacy system. Thereafter you can upload the FG and SFG stocks using 561 movement and the differences expected in this process is minimal.
This is the best course of action to be followed. Even though your legacy system doesn't have this level of details but it would be better to create some form of estimation and try to match the same in new SAP system would be better as your client would not be ready to write off inventory valuation just because of go live.
Scenario 2A : Material Valuation is not based on any estimates and Material Ledger / Actual Costing is not implemented.
In this case I can understand that the client would be able to provide item wise valuation sheet for FG but he would not be able to provide any breakup by CE. In that case it would be better not to create a cost estimate for FG and SFG before upload. Rather manually put the item wise prices in the system so that when you load the data the legacy matches SAP. Remember in all cases take the RM and stores at the prices they are being carried out in the inventory. After the inventory is uploaded then you can execute the cost estimate and you get entries in the revaluation account. This amount posted to revaluation account can be separately stored in another GL (a balance sheet account, say FG Valuation - Manual) and that is also carried on year after year or written off as per convenience.
(ii) In this case I assume that you would not be able to get even an itemised list of FG and SFG valuation and in that case you can create the cost estimate first , upload FG and SFG and then the difference would be there between legacy and SAP which can be posted to a Balance sheet account as mentioned in (i).
Scenario 2B : When you have Material Ledger implemented
In this case th job is a bit easier. If you have itemised costs for the materials then what you need to do is that in a excel file calculate the item wise difference of the FG, SFG and RM etc and then go to transaction MR22 and post these differences there debiting or crediting the materials. In this process the advantage is that for materials being carried in standard price the difference is posted to the inventory price variance account but the advantage is that this price variance account is taken care when the month end valuation of the inventory. Therefore the difference totals up with the inventory valuation.
Do get back with your scenario in order to get more inputs
Kind Regards // Shaubhik

Std cost esimating for semi finshed meterials

hi co experts
i am facing this problem at the time of estimating std cost for semi finshed meterial
pls see this problem and tell me the solutions
No price could be determined for material/batch 7000118/ plant PPP1
Message no. CK465
Diagnosis
The system could not calculate a price for material/batch 7000118/ in plant PPP1 for valuation view 0, because none of the valuation strategies in valuation variant Z02 was successful.
System Response
User-defined error management enables you to specify whether the message is an error message, a warning message or an information message.
If you have defined the message as a warning message or an information message, the costing item will be entered in the cost estimate with a value of zero.
If you have defined the message as an error message, the cost estimate contains an error or errors.
In the case of a material cost estimate, the system sets the status KF.
If it is a cost estimate without quantity structure, or base object cost estimate (that is, a unit cost estimate), the system cannot proceed with costing until you have corrected the errors.
If the system issues a termination message, the cost estimate cannot be processed, and processing is terminated.
Procedure
Check the master data for material/batch 7000118/ in plant PPP1.
If you have authorization for Customizing, check the valuation strategy for materials in valuation variant Z02.
Note
If the message is a warning message or an information message, there is a danger that materials with errors will be ignored by the system.
If, because of this, you issue a warning message and at the same time include materials with a zero value in cost estimates, you can make the following settings for these materials in the costing view of the material master:
1. Enter a very low price in the planned price 1, 2 or 3 fields manually, for instance 0.01 USD. These prices are used for costing purposes only; they are not read by other applications.
2. Enter the highest price unit possible, for example 10000.
Note: If you enter a new price unit that is higher than the costing lot size, the system increases the costing lot size accordingly.
3. Change the valuation strategy, such as strategy 4, where you could enter the planned price field in which you entered the low price.
The system now costs as follows:
Using the valuation strategy, the system finds planned price 1, 2 or 3. Due to the low price and high price unit, the system rounds the value to zero. However, the cost estimate still obtains status KA (free of errors), and no error message is issued.
This procedure can be used for all materials that have caused error message CK465 to be issued.

Dear Venkataswamy,
Check whether have you maintained the planned price for that material in Costing 2 view,
Also check this thread [Planned price |Re: Planned Price updation In Material Master]
[standard Cost estimate|Re: Standard Cost Estimate]
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Error while doing Std.cost estimation.

Hallo gurus,
I am facing one problem while doing Std.Cost estimation.
Let me explain in detailed..
I am doing costing estimation for a Product. This product contains both Bought out Material and Customer Supplied Products.But both are coming as Material class as Raw material.
But Overheads to be calculated differently for those means for Bought out product - 1.5% and for Customer supplied Products-5%.
So i have created one Overhead Key and the same is attached to Overhead
Group and this overhead group is attached to a respective material.
In Costing sheet for overhead i have selected Dependency D010 and maintained the same along with Overhead key..
But while executing CK11N, system is not calculating the same.
Pls through some light on this....
Advance Thanks..
Regds,
Janardhan.

Did you attached the costing sheet in costing variant?

How to include some costs in standart price on the base of material costs?

Hi,
the current client want to include some costs in standart price for the material on the base of raw material costs (according to bill of material). "Some costs" are costs for whole plant or workshop: electricity, gas, salary of some wokers an so on. These costs can not be ascribe to concrete finished products, but must be included in cost of goods manufactured. I assume to use cost center to collect these costs. Direct costs for raw material collects on cost collectors.
Now the problem by standard cost estimate:
1.The balance this cost center must be zero (it follows flegal requirements). Therefore I can not use overhead rates. Or I don`t know something?
2. I can create activity type, calculate its price on the base of planned costs of this cost center and use it in operation in routing for finished product. But in routing I can not use the costs of raw material to determine how many units of activity type must be confirmed. I can make only rule like: 1 Unit finished product - 1 Unit of activity type.
So, no chance?
P.S.
In fact there is no problem - I can use distribution of cost objects hierarchy
Best regards,
Yury
Edited by: Yury Pogorelov on Jun 17, 2009 4:33 PM
Edited by: Yury Pogorelov on Jun 17, 2009 4:33 PM
Edited by: Yury Pogorelov on Jun 17, 2009 4:34 PM
Edited by: Yury Pogorelov on Jun 17, 2009 4:35 PM

Hi Anu,
Putting the resource files in WEB-INF/classes is the correct and good way!
Simon

Urgent: Maintain std cost for plants under different company codes

Hi all,
Company code(s)/Plant(s): C1/P1, C2/P2, ..., CnPn
BOMs and Routings are maintained under P1. I believe that unlike BOM routing can't be made available across plants. So how does one maintain std cost across plants under different company codes?
Thanks.

Hi,
You have to maintain individual BOM, Routing and varaint for all plants.
Best Regards
Ashish Jain

What is the Std Cost field in Material document

Hi,
Can someone please advice what the table name and fieldname for fetching the std cost from the material document.
I have checked the tables MKPF and MSEG but could'nt find any.
Thanks,
Arti

Hi,
Can you please tell me where the Standard Cost is stored in the Material Document ? I am looking the same Material Document in the MIGO 'Display Mode' and i am able to trace the Accounting Documents in it..
Can you please clearify where that field is present in the MB03 or MIGO Tcode....
Edited by: nav009 on Jan 15, 2010 7:25 AM

We cannot do std cost estimate every month in ML

HI
Can we do std cost estimate whenever required with changed price,
can i change the price in material master -how
regards
sowmya

Hi,
We can do std cost estimate once in a month. If we want to do multiple times in a month we should reorganise the material cost estimate using CKR1.
We can change the material master price for a material with out standard cost estimate using MR21.
If standard cost estimate exist, use CKR1, the use MR21.
Regards,
Rijo Paul

Std. cost estimate

Dear Experts,
We have ROH, HALB & ZMAT as materials. The question is with respect std. cost estimate.
The cost estimate are run for HALB & ZMAT items created on day to day basis. However cost estimate is executed for all the HALB & ZMAT on alternate months.
I would lke to know the best practice or industry standard on this issue on the frequency of estimates. I appreciate any other points rellated to this point.
Thanks in advance.
T.S.Shankar

hi read the following basics of CO-PC
1)A material cost estimate used to calculate the standard price in the
material master record.
2)The cost estimate must be executed with a costing variant that updates
the material master, and the cost estimate must be released.
3)Forms the basis for profit planning or product costing where the focus
is on determining the variances.
4)Typicall, a standard cost estimate is created for each product at the
beginning of the fiscal year or new season or BEGINING OF THE PERIOD / MONTH.
5)Standard cost estimates establish standard prices for semifinished
products and finished products. The costs calculated in standard cost
estimates are used to valuate materials with standard price control.
A costing type that calculates the cost of goods manufactured for a
product during the course of a planning period.
It differs from the standard cost estimate in that it uses the quantity
structure that has changed during the planning period as the basis for
calculating costs.   ( WHEN EVR YOUR PLANNING WILL BE CHANGED    )
CURRENT COST ESTIMATE
1)A cost estimate that can be created at any time to valuate the current
quantity structure with the current prices.
This cost estimate serves the following purposes:
A) You can compare its results with the results of the standard cost
     estimate to support decision-making in production.
B)You can transfer the results of this cost estimate to the material
     master and use them to valuate the goods receipt when working with
     materials that use the moving average price.
Regards
Mala K Reddy

Table for std cost of material

HI,
in which table can we get Std cost of material?

Try to check table MBEW for the field STPRS.
Hope this helps
Regards
Sai

KOB1 to include Std Cost, Actual cost......

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for