Std cost esimating for semi finshed meterials

hi co experts
i am facing this problem at the time of estimating std cost for semi finshed meterial
pls see this problem and tell me the solutions
No price could be determined for material/batch 7000118/ plant PPP1
Message no. CK465
Diagnosis
The system could not calculate a price for material/batch 7000118/ in plant PPP1 for valuation view 0, because none of the valuation strategies in valuation variant Z02 was successful.
System Response
User-defined error management enables you to specify whether the message is an error message, a warning message or an information message.
If you have defined the message as a warning message or an information message, the costing item will be entered in the cost estimate with a value of zero.
If you have defined the message as an error message, the cost estimate contains an error or errors.
In the case of a material cost estimate, the system sets the status KF.
If it is a cost estimate without quantity structure, or base object cost estimate (that is, a unit cost estimate), the system cannot proceed with costing until you have corrected the errors.
If the system issues a termination message, the cost estimate cannot be processed, and processing is terminated.
Procedure
Check the master data for material/batch 7000118/ in plant PPP1.
If you have authorization for Customizing, check the valuation strategy for materials in valuation variant Z02.
Note
If the message is a warning message or an information message, there is a danger that materials with errors will be ignored by the system.
If, because of this, you issue a warning message and at the same time include materials with a zero value in cost estimates, you can make the following settings for these materials in the costing view of the material master:
1. Enter a very low price in the planned price 1, 2 or 3 fields manually, for instance 0.01 USD. These prices are used for costing purposes only; they are not read by other applications.
2. Enter the highest price unit possible, for example 10000.
Note: If you enter a new price unit that is higher than the costing lot size, the system increases the costing lot size accordingly.
3. Change the valuation strategy, such as strategy 4, where you could enter the planned price field in which you entered the low price.
The system now costs as follows:
Using the valuation strategy, the system finds planned price 1, 2 or 3. Due to the low price and high price unit, the system rounds the value to zero. However, the cost estimate still obtains status KA (free of errors), and no error message is issued.
This procedure can be used for all materials that have caused error message CK465 to be issued.

Dear Venkataswamy,
Check whether have you maintained the planned price for that material in Costing 2 view,
Also check this thread [Planned price |Re: Planned Price updation In Material Master]
[standard Cost estimate|Re: Standard Cost Estimate]
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Similar Messages

Component Price Change before CK11N for Std Cost Estimate-Mat(ppc1)

Hello CO Gurus ,
When I am running std. costing (ck11n) for a fert material it is giving price by exploding its bom( adding component prices).
I want to take one of its component price by taking 125% .( i.e. in the master (account view )of component price is Rs.100, I want to take its price as Rs.125 without increasing its quantity and then add the total price of fert material. There is a tab 'costing relevancy' in bom component component, I am clicking 125% costing rel. indicator, but it is taking master Std price not 125% of this Std price.
How to increase the component price more than specified in its master?
Your answer will be appreciated
Regards
Jia

Hi,
There is what can I suggest.
Create new costing variant with valuation variant that takes for example planned price 3 into account when running ck11n. Then put the new price for the material in planned price 3 field in costing view 2. This way you can recalculate cost with different prices for components without changing BOMs and Standard prices.

Urgent: Maintain std cost for plants under different company codes

Hi all,
Company code(s)/Plant(s): C1/P1, C2/P2, ..., CnPn
BOMs and Routings are maintained under P1. I believe that unlike BOM routing can't be made available across plants. So how does one maintain std cost across plants under different company codes?
Thanks.

Hi,
You have to maintain individual BOM, Routing and varaint for all plants.
Best Regards
Ashish Jain

Table for std cost of material

HI,
in which table can we get Std cost of material?

Try to check table MBEW for the field STPRS.
Hope this helps
Regards
Sai

Change in FG/SFG valuation system from STD cost MAP

As of now we use Std cost for valuation of FG/SFG and we would like to switchover to MAP for following reasons:
1.We donu2019t see any significant benefit from present costing system. Std costing updation, monthly CO closing, periodical revision of STD cost is not really justifying any benefits compared to the overall efforts put in for above activities.
2.KE 30 reports fail to give correct productwise contribution status as system loads all variance to quantity sold during the PERIOD( e.g If production is 1000 qty, sales 200 qty- , then system will load the variance of entire 1000 qty to sales qty of 200). This is misleading. It is not possible to sale all produced qty in same period in our case.
3.SFGs being produced in one plant trfd to another for FG production. To produce final product X, SFG A is needed, to produce A, SFG B required, to produce B, SFG C required. This is discrete mfg process and and SFG are produced in different plants under same co code. So, we are not able get contribution report of product X as component SFG A it self contains OH/activity cost.( We want to calculate contribution company as a whole i.e Selling price minus material cost( actually bought out materials and not SFG).
We donu2019t want to go for material ledger, considering the manufacturing complexity. Now, we want to change price control of all FG/SFGs fromu201DSu201D to u201CVu201D on cut-off date after making stock NIL
Kindly give us your expert advise on this approach. What are the challenges we will face by doing so.? Is there any company done this type of changes?
MBS

Hi MBS
1. ML is the right and only solution for your expectations
2. Whether you adopt V or S - CO CLosing is what you cant avoid... You will still need to do the whole CO cycle whether you have V or S
3. Having price control V for In House Mfd materials will damage the inventory valuation forever... Refer Note 81682 - Pr.contr.V for semi-finished and finished, which explains this in detail
What you want is Actual Costing, which can only be delivered by ML
What you want to avoid is monthly CO Closing - Which you really cant avoid
If you still go with V - May be in future you would realise that S was better as suggested by SAP in the above note...
You can take up an enhancement with your ABAP team to develop the kind of reports you want... however, thats not going to be easy... Its gonna take very long to stabilize, even if achieved
br, Ajay M

Std cost strategy in Cutover

Hello,
I have a query related to Std costing in cutover period.
If client doents have any costing system in legasy system prior to SAP golive. If there is any stock in cutover and that is as per price control S then how the strategy to be applied in cutiver for std costing. If we calculated cost as per BOM and routing in cotover then ther are chances that the value of stock would be different than the legacy system stock value, and becasue of different price the inventory value in legacy system and SAP would be with huge different. so request you to please inform how the std cost is trated in cutover period.
Reg,
Harry

Hello Harry,
You would need to ascertain the basis on which the cost is being carried out in the existing system and then you need to take appropriate steps and follow the correct sequence to arrive at the cost at which the stock is carried in the legacy system. Now the question arises that whether the legacy system has some form of estimate for the finished and the semi finished goods or they are valuating the same at some standard price which does not necessarily correspond to the prices of the RMs and the activity types.
Scenario 1 : Material valuation is based on cost estimates
In this case what I mean is that the value of the FG & SFG would be based on the prices of the RMs and activity. In this case the first step would be to update the RM and stores prices with the prices at which they are being carried in the inventory. It should also be kept in mind that the pre-golive BOM and Routing should be same as post golive. The next step would be creation of cost estimate for FG and SFG that would correspond to the value at which they are being carried in the legacy system. Thereafter you can upload the FG and SFG stocks using 561 movement and the differences expected in this process is minimal.
This is the best course of action to be followed. Even though your legacy system doesn't have this level of details but it would be better to create some form of estimation and try to match the same in new SAP system would be better as your client would not be ready to write off inventory valuation just because of go live.
Scenario 2A : Material Valuation is not based on any estimates and Material Ledger / Actual Costing is not implemented.
In this case I can understand that the client would be able to provide item wise valuation sheet for FG but he would not be able to provide any breakup by CE. In that case it would be better not to create a cost estimate for FG and SFG before upload. Rather manually put the item wise prices in the system so that when you load the data the legacy matches SAP. Remember in all cases take the RM and stores at the prices they are being carried out in the inventory. After the inventory is uploaded then you can execute the cost estimate and you get entries in the revaluation account. This amount posted to revaluation account can be separately stored in another GL (a balance sheet account, say FG Valuation - Manual) and that is also carried on year after year or written off as per convenience.
(ii) In this case I assume that you would not be able to get even an itemised list of FG and SFG valuation and in that case you can create the cost estimate first , upload FG and SFG and then the difference would be there between legacy and SAP which can be posted to a Balance sheet account as mentioned in (i).
Scenario 2B : When you have Material Ledger implemented
In this case th job is a bit easier. If you have itemised costs for the materials then what you need to do is that in a excel file calculate the item wise difference of the FG, SFG and RM etc and then go to transaction MR22 and post these differences there debiting or crediting the materials. In this process the advantage is that for materials being carried in standard price the difference is posted to the inventory price variance account but the advantage is that this price variance account is taken care when the month end valuation of the inventory. Therefore the difference totals up with the inventory valuation.
Do get back with your scenario in order to get more inputs
Kind Regards // Shaubhik

Standard Cost Estimate for Subcontracting

Dear Sir / Madam,
We are in the process of migrating from our normal R/3 operations for Production Planning to Execution inclusive of Costing of materials by using iPPE functionality for repetitive scenario. We have our BOMs for painted body currently in R/3. The painted body falls under subcontracting scenario.
In this scenario the body in white produced from our bodyshop is sent out to the subcontractor along with certain paint items and is received as painted body and consumption of the body in white and the paint items sent needs to be shown during the goods receipt of painted body.
For this we have maintained the BOM for the painted body in iPPE. Also in the costing variant "ZD01" in order to arrive at Standard cost (CK11N) for the painted body we have maintained the following settings for Valuation variant for subcontracting :
Priority     Strategy Sequence
1          Net Quotation Price
2          Effective Price from Purchase Order
While running CK11N for the material (painted body) we are receiving the following message
Message no. 28501 : Error in dependency processing: condition 0000062388 is empty
We wanted to verify whether the message raised is normal or would it have any adverse impact.
Your assistance would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Bhavika
Edited by: Bhavika Goyal on Feb 7, 2009 12:20 PM

Dear All,
Control Key is important for inhouse producrtion and Sub Contract. Check it once and when ever u have given the Product (semi fisished) to Sub Contractor, along with Paint.
Here one thing is important what is your process? how much portionis involced in Sub contracting. why because
Paint issue to the sub con is captured by the way for migo or miro
Payment to sub contract is capture all the cost of the Sub Con., then is there any cost is missed for this process. Let me know the remain things?
thanqu
raj

Error while doing Std.cost estimation.

Hallo gurus,
I am facing one problem while doing Std.Cost estimation.
Let me explain in detailed..
I am doing costing estimation for a Product. This product contains both Bought out Material and Customer Supplied Products.But both are coming as Material class as Raw material.
But Overheads to be calculated differently for those means for Bought out product - 1.5% and for Customer supplied Products-5%.
So i have created one Overhead Key and the same is attached to Overhead
Group and this overhead group is attached to a respective material.
In Costing sheet for overhead i have selected Dependency D010 and maintained the same along with Overhead key..
But while executing CK11N, system is not calculating the same.
Pls through some light on this....
Advance Thanks..
Regds,
Janardhan.

Did you attached the costing sheet in costing variant?

Valuated Sales Order stock for Semi-Finished Products

Dear Gurus,
One of my client faced the issue that the semi-finished products is valuated-sales order. We are in Mill Industries, downstream (steel processing). The situation is:
1. We use configuration material for both finished and semi-finished products. Both are valuated at standard costs with valuated sales order stock.
2. Once the sales order is created, the cost estimates are created for both Finished, and semi-finished products.
3. The production orders is created for the semi-finished products. During production, several semi-fg and fg can be manufactured at the same time. We are using the co-products feature to cover that.
4. During the goods receipt of semi-finished products, instead of using the standard costs in sales order cost estimate, it use the planned costs in production orders which against our design.
I tried to use the user exit COPC002 and influence the standard costs. But it seems that the routine is not called for semi-fg at all. Anyone has any light on this?
Regards,

Hi
I think you are talking about Special Stock "E"...ie) Sale Order Stock...
If my understanding is correct then,
If you go and see the Table T156....For the
Movement Type: 101,
Special stock Indicator : E,
Qty. Updation Checked,
Val. Updation Checked,
Movement Indicator : Against PO,
Consumption Indicator: Sales Order Stock.....combination....the transaction Event Key....GBB only has been Assigned....these settings you cannot change...
This linkage you can view in OLMW-----> Account Determination -
> Acc. Determination W/O Wizard -
>Account Grouping....also
Reward if useful
Regards
S.Baskaran
Edited by: baskaran srinivasan on Dec 20, 2007 12:18 PM

How to include ED in Std.cost estimate

Dear all
My client want to add ED to Std. cost estimate in receiving plant(Depot). I have acheived this by way of additive cost estimate manually. but my client wants that system could pick up the Ed from SD where ED is maintained SKU wise.
At recieving plant(Depot) the std.cost estimate is like this
Std cost from production Plant
ED from SD
Freight ( certain % on ( St.cost+ED)
Std cost at depot
Is it possible to get above scenerio?
Pl help me out
Regards
SPSankaram

HI
Standard formula for workcenter costing is SAP008 , you have to specify in the costing and capacity tab , whereas for scheduling specify SAP004
then try creating the order
regards
thyagarajan

Cost elements for WIP (TCODE : OKGA)

Hi All,
I am working with Production Order wip calculation, varaince and settlement.
In the RA key configuraion,(for WIP calculation)In OKGA, tcode we define, the cost elements for a perticular line id, for WIP calculation.
I wanted to know, what is the purpose of these two cost elements.
If I execute line item report, I dont see any value on these cost elements, after wip calc and settlement.
However, I see the work in process on it, in the layout. I want to know, the exact purpose of these cost elements assignment.
Is there any internal controlling document that is getting posted?
Regards
SR

Hi Swastik,
Those cost elements (category 31) are used to calculate and store WIP values at the detailed level of so called line IDs.
Line IDs are groups of cost elements that were posted to production order.
For example you can calculate and store WIP separately for Raw Materials, Semis, Activities and overhead.
You can also settle them to different GL Accounts via mapping in txn.OKG8.
Hope it helps,
Szymon

Cost elements for TAX expenses

Dear all,
Is it necessory to create cost elements for following GL's ??
We are not going to implement PCA here.We are going to implement Product Costing.
50000031     EXCISE DUTY - PURHASE
50000032     SALES TAX C.S.T-PUR
50000033     SALES TAX M.S.T-PUR
50000034     EXCISE REBATE CENVAT
50000035     SALES TAX (PUR)
50000044     EXCISE REBATE CONSUM
50100000     CLOSING STOCK OF SEM
50100001     CLOSING STOCK OF FIN
50100002     OPENING STOCK - SEMI
50100003     OPENING STOCK - FINI
50100058     ROUNDING OFF
50100138     Cost of Goods Sold
50200011     PREVIOUS YEAR EXPENS
50200012     PREVIOUS YEAR TAXES
50200013     Doubtful Advances Provisions
50200014     Doubtful Debts Provisions
50200015     Realized Loss on Foregn exchange
50200016     Unrealized Loss on Foregn exchange
Thanks & regards,
Ranjeet

Ranjeet
Check your Previous threads answer
Anup

What is the Std Cost field in Material document

Hi,
Can someone please advice what the table name and fieldname for fetching the std cost from the material document.
I have checked the tables MKPF and MSEG but could'nt find any.
Thanks,
Arti

Hi,
Can you please tell me where the Standard Cost is stored in the Material Document ? I am looking the same Material Document in the MIGO 'Display Mode' and i am able to trace the Accounting Documents in it..
Can you please clearify where that field is present in the MB03 or MIGO Tcode....
Edited by: nav009 on Jan 15, 2010 7:25 AM

We cannot do std cost estimate every month in ML

HI
Can we do std cost estimate whenever required with changed price,
can i change the price in material master -how
regards
sowmya

Hi,
We can do std cost estimate once in a month. If we want to do multiple times in a month we should reorganise the material cost estimate using CKR1.
We can change the material master price for a material with out standard cost estimate using MR21.
If standard cost estimate exist, use CKR1, the use MR21.
Regards,
Rijo Paul

Cost planning for a project

Hi Experts,
Can anybody tell is there is any t-code to mass change of the cost planning for a project. If there is a t-code please explain me the procedure how to do it.
Thanks & Regards
Raman T S

You can budegt a project by:
1. Transferring the values in the cost planning as budget.
2. Entering the budget directly into the WBS element.
PS STD cycle of creating Project is as follows:
1. Creating the Project in the Project builder
2. Using the relationships to link the activities
3. Planning the output & duration of activities
4. Sceduling the Project
5. Planning Costs
6. Allocating budget
7. Releasing the Project for execution
Choose Original Budget.
In the Planned total column, you see the values copied from cost planning.
Select the planned total column.
Choose Edit ® Copy view.
Percentage rate-100
Overwrite- Select
In the dialog box, enter the following data:
The system copies the values from cost planning into the budget.
Hope ur prob will be solved
Regards,
ANSAR

Std cost esimating for semi finshed meterials

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for