KP26 Planned Actvity

Dear All,
Can you let me know what is the use of Planned activity / Capacity in KP26 and also Price(fixed) and Variable,etc and how it influence while executing the transaction( Cost Extimation).
How the system makes the calculation. explain with an example.
Also let me know the difference between KP26 & KP06 , I am bit confussed between KP26 and KP06.
Regards,

Dear Ranjan,
Thanks for the reply.
Can you let me know the below mentioned points.
I have a Cost Center : Labour Cost and Activity as Labour.
I have asigned the cost center and Activity in KP26 with a plan price indicator 1
In Plan activity column i have given 15000 and in variable price column i have given 2500 for 100 units.
When i am executing kspi,the system is displaying Activity Qnty :80000 Total price :2425 and variable price 2425 for 100 units for the current period(also to all previous periods).
Now what is this 80000 units, from where it has updated and why the price is changed to 2425 from 2500(given in KP26).
Also let me know how can i find the cost element for KP06 from KP26 details.
When i am providing the the above combination along with the cost element (which is in KP26) to KP06 system is prompting an error as "Cost element xxxxxxxx can only be used for activity input".
Kindly suggest.
Regards

Similar Messages

Deletion KP26 planned values.

Hi Gurus,
When at the time of uploading planned activity prices in KP26, we entered wrongly cost centre and activity type.
Now we dont want that combination, we try to delete that but still it is coming again.
It is happening in Production, stilll we are not gone live, when we run CK40N this problem it showing.
we are not able to delete at all.
What would be solution.
Regards
Sreenivas.P

Dear Sreenivas,
Now the problem is occuring because of the wrong assignment or combination of Cost center/Activity Type.
Better create a new cost center, activity type and then fix the rates in KP26.
Now you can sssign this cost center in the costing tab key in the work center either in CR01/CR02 and
also the activity type.So if this work center is assigned to perform some operation either in routing/Rate
routing,while doing the cost rollup using CK11N or CK40N,the new cost for peforming the operations get's
picked up as per the new rates.Follow these steps.
1.Create a Cost center using T code - KS01.
2.Create an activity type using T code - KL01.
3.Assign the Rates for an activity type & cost center combination using T code KP26.
4.In the input screen of T code KP26 ,enter version as 0, from period 1 and to period as 12 and the Fiscal
Year as 2008,enter the cost center, activity type click on overview screen (F5)---> enter the per hour Rate
under Fixed price and set value as 2 for distribution key and plan price indicator as 3.
5.After performing this ,while creating the work center ,this combination of activity type & cost center
should be assigned.Then while creating routing/task list this work center can assigned for performing
operations.
Check with this & revert back if you need any further help.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

KP26 planning

Hi All,
We have one controlling area ,which is created with EURO currency and till now we are only one company code and currency is EURO.but now we are implementing another company code (CANDIAN dollars) and will to assign to EURO controlling area.
when we plan in KP26,are we going to plan in EURO or CANADIAN dollars?
can we plan only CANADIAN dollars?how can i do this?please help me with this.
Thanks,
Anusha

Hi,
the KP26 standard planning layouts use controlling area currency (its EUR in your case). As Eli said, create your own planning layouts by copying the standard layouts and change the columns to object currency.
Ensure currency translation is set up in the way you need it in the fiscal year-depending parameters of the CO-plan version definition.
Best regards, Christian

KP26 Planning - Cost Centre Group

Hi
I am trying to enter the plan activity type figures and amount through KP26. I have selected the standard layout 1-201. I entered a cost centre group and activity type. However, when going inside, It is coming only for a cost cetnre. Why it is not showing the data input of all cost centres in the selected group ?
Moderator: Please, avoid asking questions on basic layout of standard transactions

let me ask one clarification in activity planning.
There are few cost elements which are directly attributable to Activities and there are others cost elements which are not directly related (fixed).
In the above scenario, I hope, I have to use both KP06 & KP26 processes. In the activity related, I have to use the quanity entry as well as the variable price. In the KP06, I have to enter only the activity unrelated amount. Am I correct ?

KP06/KP26 Plan Upload

We have around 40 cost centres for which plan figures need to be uploaded. Is there any way where we can upload the cost element planning for all these cost centres at a stretch (i.e. rather than uploading the figures for the cost centres one by one for all the cost elements..).

Use the standard SAP feature for doing this,
Create a layout in transaction KP34, you can copy from an existing layout like SAP all, ensure to put the integrated excel check on, and while you see the layout the system will generate the file description for it, you can download the excel layout as your upload template, that is across all the cost centers.
Make a note of the file description and keep the upload file that you have downloaded handy, in kp06 from the menu use
Extras-->excel Planning --> Upload
Select the file description tha toyu have made a note of, and upload the file with the filled data,
You should be able to upload it easily.
Please let me know if you neeed more clarity
Thanks
Naveen

KSPI - Price calculation returns error depending on which periods you plan

Hi guys,
I wanted to share this with you to see if this is a 'Bug', or if it's just the way I'm doing it. Here is step by step of what I did.
1) Created activity-independant cost planning for cost center # 3000 (KP06), for $10,000. It's broken up into periods as below:
Period 01
Period 02       $5,000
Period 03       $5,000
Period 04
Period 05
Period 06
Period 07
Period 08
Period 09
Period 10
Period 11
Period 12
2) Created activity input planning (KP26) for activity type LBRHR for 1,000 hours, broken up as follows into periods:
Period 01
Period 02
Period 03       500
Period 04       500
Period 05
Period 06
Period 07
Period 08
Period 09
Period 10
Period 11
Period 12
Then I execute KPSI for periods 1-12. In addition, I'm using pricing method '2', which is based on the average calculation. So theoritically it should take the total of $10,000 and divide it by 1,000 LBRHR and get an average periodical price of $10 per hours. In addition, I have the equivNo of '1' for all periods in the activity planning (KP26).
Now when I perform KPSI, I get the following error message. "Cost center CTR SC01/3000, cost element 611000: Splitting is not possible. Cost element 611000 cannot be split for cost center CTR SC01/3000, period(s) 2, because:the total of the activity type equivalence numbers is zero. Therefore, there is no splitting base for this cost element. OR
the target costs for cost object hierarchies are zero. This means there is no distribution basis for this cost element."
So when I change my activity planning in a way that I have the quantity planned starts on and/or before period 2 instead of period 3, then it works fine. So it seems like the system needs the activity quantity planning (KP26) to start in the same period or on an earlier periods as the first cost planning (KP06) period. In this example it needs activity planned in period 002 or earlier.
Is this the way it's supposed to be working?
How can I have it, so that it works even if the activity planning (KP26) is entered in periods after the periods that had cost planning (KP06)?
I appreciate your input and ideas.
Thanks
Edited by: Ehab Mansour on Feb 18, 2009 8:41 AM
Edited by: Ehab Mansour on Feb 18, 2009 8:42 AM
Edited by: Ehab Mansour on Feb 18, 2009 8:42 AM

Hi Srikanth
I understand what you're explaining.
But my understanding of using the pricing method of 'Average', it that it would ignore whether you have activities planned (KP26) for same periods as you have activity independant costs (KP06), and just take the total costs and divide it by the total activities. If it was pricing method 'Periodic', then I would agree with the error message, because it has to make sure you have the complete information for each of the periods.
I tried putting zero, or deleting out the entry '1' in Equiv No.for those periods that I dont have activity quantity (KP26) planned so that the system can ignore those periods when searching for activities to apply the activity Independant costs to, but it didnt make any difference, still got the error message.
Then I tried a scenario where activity planning (KP26) is not necessarily made on the same periods as activity Independant planning (KP06), but just planned on earlier periods, as below:
1) Created activity-independant cost planning for cost center # 3000 (KP06), for $10,000. It's broken up into periods as below:
Period 01
Period 02
Period 03
Period 04 $5,000
Period 05 $5,000
Period 06
Period 07
Period 08
Period 09
Period 10
Period 11
Period 12
2) Created activity input planning (KP26) for activity type LBRHR for 1,000 hours, broken up as follows into periods:
Period 01 500
Period 02 500
Period 03
Period 04
Period 05
Period 06
Period 07
Period 08
Period 09
Period 10
Period 11
Period 12
The system did not return an error. so it seems to accept it as longer as Activity quantity planning (KP26) is on and/or before the period of activity Independant planning, and NOT after ( in this example periods 2 3, it didn't have to be on 45 ). I don't get that logic.
Ideas?

Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing

Friends,
I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
1.Cost Component Structure
10 – Material
20 – Labour
30 – Diesel
40 – Electricity
2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
Labour – 2.0 HR
Diesel – 1.0 HR
Electricity – 5.0 HR
3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
Like;
1              E              LAB10    994310                  2.00        2.00        AED        1.0          HR Labour Cost New
2              E              DIE20    994320                  5.00        5.00        AED        1.0          HR Diesel Cost New
3              E              ELE30    994330                  1.00        1.00        AED        1.0          HR Electricity Cost
4              M            1100000042                          5.00        0.00        AED        1              PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
5              G            994201                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Depriciation Cost
6              G            994202                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Sales & Distribution Cost
                                                                          13.00                    AED
4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            13.00-
994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      1.33
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      3.33
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      0.67
                                                                                                                                          2.67- AED
Note :- As per my understanding it should be
    Labour Cost New                                            2.00
                Diesel Cost New                                              5.00
                Electricity Cost                                                1.00
5.Now after Process Order confirmation
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            00.00
994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      4.00
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      5.00
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      2.00
                                                                                                                                          16.00
6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
I have configured the system in below manner
1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
      Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
      Product/Order
7.Assessment Cycle Details
Controlling Area      1000 Controlling Area
Cycle                ZELE01                  Status    Reviewed
Start Date 01.01.2014 To 31.10.2014
Text                  Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
IND- Interactive
Assessment CEle       994215      Electricity Cost All
Sender
Cost Center    CBAKYDXBAD
Cost Element 40204
Receiver
Cost Center    CBAKYPDDXB
Tracing Factor
Var.portion type – Actual Activity
Selaction Criteria
Activity Type - ELE30
Receivers Tracing Factor
Cost Ctr Factor per        100
CBAKYPDDXB 100
8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
KSS2 Actual cost splitting
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB01                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE02                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE03                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE20                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE30                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB10                    183.35
                                                                                                                1100.00
Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
OTy        Object                                  Name                  AUn                Act Qty      Total price    Price (Fixed)              PUnit
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20        Production Dxb      HR                  5.0          366.66                  366.66                    10
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.65                  916.65                    10
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.75                916.75                    10
                                                                                                                                                      2200.06
2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042                            5.00        5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071                            13.00-    13.00-
994310                  Labour Cost New                                            CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10                      1.33        183.35
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20                      3.33        183.33
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30                      0.67        183.33
                                                                                                                                                          2.67-      542.01
Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
Main issue is
Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
Thanks
Sagar Chinchkar

Dear Rajneesh,
I have made the changes as suggested....
It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
Structure Z1
Splitting structure for AT
Assignment 10
Electricity Cost
100
Allocation for ELE
Cost Element
994215
Activity Type
ELE30
Splitting Rule
100
Allocation for ELE
12
Activity quantity
Version 0
In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
Order 1 - QTY 2
Order 2 - QTY 1.1
Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
       QTY 3.1         Tot Price 3,709.68        Planned(FIX) 3,709.68     Per Units 10
       (System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
    3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
      Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
Order 1 - QTY 2 -   558.00
Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
Total -                    965.57
     4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
     LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
     DIE20 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
Which should not be the case....
                                                                                                              PL     Act     Var
40002
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
1005/1100000042
10.00
15.00
50.00
40015
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
1005/4400000074
26.00-
26.00-
994201
Depriciation Cost
WMBDDEP01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994202
Sales & Distribution Cost
WMBDS&A01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994310
Labour Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
4.00
0.00
100.00-
994320
Diesel Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
10.00
0.00
100.00-
994330
Electricity Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
2.00
408.06
20,303.00
If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
What setting is required in current system.....
Million thanks in advance....
Regards
Sagar Chinchkar

Where to find debit entry for planned activities through cost centre?

hello experts,
our client would like to know the impact of planned activities cost debit entry. the scenario is as follows.
1. at the year begining we are planning activity hrs against any cost centre.
2. respective activity hours are being confirmed through PP/PM orders.
this time orders are being credited and cost centres are being debited for the activty prices.
Now the question is tracability of credit entry wrt corresponding entry debit entry in the cost centre.
Can anyone help me out?
Regards,
Varsha.

Hi,
Let break this issue.
1. If you maintain KP06, with reference to CE / CC / Activity, you get debit entries for the relevant cost centers
2. If you maintain KP26 Planned Activities and Planned Rates, you get credit to the relevant cost centers
So in the S_ALR_87013611 report referred to above, you would get both debit and credit to the cost centers in Plan Costs column + you can check the plan activities in the below section.
As against this actuals:
1. When you post your expenses to the cost centers / carry out assessment or distribution cycles for production cost centers (linked to the activity types), you ge the actual debits.
2. When you confirm the operations of the production orders, you get the credit to the cost centers.
Hope this clarifies your doubt.
Cheers!!

SAP-PS(Actual & plan cost)

1)When i am calculating my plan cost for an activity whose duration is 10days , working is 8h/day and rate is 50/hr , my plan cost is coming rs. 8000 instead of 4000. can anyone help?
After confirming an activity 100% , actual cost is not coming. Is there any customisation in confirmation or at any other place?
Regards,

Dear Hemant Sir ,
As I am new to SAP-PS , so after applying your solution also , I am not getting the desired results. So I am giving complete details of work centers and activity types defined by me as problem lies here only.
Work center :-
Basic data tab
     Standard value key = sap0
Default value :-
     Control key=ps01
Capacities tab :-
     Other formula =sap004
Scheduling tab :-
     Other formula=sap004
Costing tab :-
     Co area =
     Cost center=
     Acttypeint pro =
          =sap008
In capacity tab :-
     Start=8.00
     Finish=17.00
     Break-1.00
     Uti=100
     Cap=1
Activity type (kl01) :-
Unit=h
Cat=*
Atypcat=1
Cost element=
Kp26 :-
Plan dis dis u p     p     p      pl
8        2    2     h 50 50 00001 1
Where is the mistake ?
Regards,

Network Activity - Timesheet: Work Center in plant does not exists

Hi All,
While doing Timesheet entry against Network and Activity in CAT2 transaction Code, I come across one scenario in which If I use copy function then one error message appears as " Work center XXXXXXX in Plant XXXX does not exists"
But same combination gets worked if I put manually and do not use copy function.
I think system checks copied entry plant with new entry Plant.
Is this system inconsistency ? If so what may be the probable solution ? OSS Note ? Exit ?
Please suggets to rectify this wrong validation message.
Many thanks in advance.
Swapnil Kharul

Hi Swapnil,
You can check following points once again.
1.Check your Network Actvity details:
Work Center/Plant : 1000/1300
Work 10 (hrs)
Activity Type :11000
DistKeyCapRqlnt:SAP020
Also Status of activity :whether it is in PCNF or CNF.
and in Network Header: check Capacity Requirements.
2.In CR02, check whether the work Center and Plant Combination.
Plant:1300
Work Center:1000
Goto Costing Tab: Note the following:
Cost Center: 4295
Actvity Type Int Proc(Bottom Field):11000
Formulae:SAP008
3.Check in KP26/27, whether Cost center has been
assigned to Activity Type for the period (or else entire Fiscal year).
Version:0
From Period:6
ToPeriod:6
Fiscal Year:2010
Cost Center:4295
Activity Type:11000
with this combination whther rate has defined or not.
Plan Actvity/Fixed Price/Variable Price
4.And also CAC2, don't hide any field in all screen Groups of your data entry profile.
Now Pl. let us know the results.(all values considered here are for your understanding)
Vemula

Actual Price

HEllo all,
I want to know that if i do the costing run then it is the standard cost which includes BoM and activity costs
After monthend when i release the standard cost then it becomes actual i understand about the Bom cost but how the activity price is becomes actual price because in costing all the activity price is picked from KP26 plan price how it becomes actual .
Is from CON2 or any other transaction and when to run CON2.
Suggest
Edited by: Prem Kumar on Oct 7, 2009 11:48 AM

Through CK40n

KSS2 Splitting equally instead of actual quantity.

HI,
I am facing an issue with cost center actual splitting in KSS2. We are maintaining the planned prices in KP26 manually and not maintaining any quantity in KP26 (Planned quantity).
I have maintained spltting configuration properly.
1. Create splitting rule 10 (Based on actual quantity confirmation) with method 12(Actual quantity). version assigned "0".
2. Spllitting rule assigned to splitting structure and maintained the cost element group and activity types.
3. Production cost centers assigned to splitting structure in OKEW.
4. I have seen the report S_ALR_87013611 report where i can the activity types quantity which is confirmed against the production order.
Now when i run the tcode KSS2(actual cost center splitting), i am getting values with equally distributed to the respective activity types.
Kindly let me know if i missed any configuration.
Regards,
Prakash.

Hi Prakash
Check if your Activity Master is enabled to calculate Actual Activty Price automatically
Your config seems correct to me, the way you have described... Also, check the fiscal year from which you assigned the CC to Splitting Structure in OKEW
If the above does not resolve, please send a screen shot of OKES (Splitting method and Assignment) and OKEW
Br. Ajay M
PS: Ravi Chirivella - I dont think above replies are correct.. The settings you described have nothing to do with Splitting in my opinion

View labor and material costs in plant maintenance work order

Hi
I am aware we can bring in the costs in the work order through Activity types and assigning the costs to the acitvity type.
Is there anyway we can bring in the actual cost for the work performed by the associate? should we link the work center to HRMS?
Please advise. I need your valuable input for all the points below.
Main points that need to be addressed:
1. Each associate that is capable of confirming hours to a work order needs to be assigned an hourly rate that is reflective of the actual cost for the work performed by this associate. These hours are then tracked through the work order to give a cost for labor assigned to that particular job.
2.Any materials used in the performance of the required task(s) dictated by the work order will be assigned to that order. These materials can be assigned through SAP purchase requisitions, tool crib spot buys, or procurement with a purchase card.
3.Standard reports need to be created so we can track the total maintenance costs for any level of the equipment hierarchy as currently set up in SAP. When this report is created it should show the total maintenace costs for all the levels of the equipment hierarchy broken down into labor cost and material cost. I am using Tcode IW37N and IW40 . Is there any suggestion?

Greetings Chandra,
1) You will need to create Work Centres for your associates and create the Activity Types. You can default the Activity Type for each Work Centre and maintain the rate for the activity via t-code KP26 planning.
2) Planned and unplanned Purchase Requisitions for Components with category N will debit the order with material costs. But what do you mean by "tool crib spot buys" and "procurement with a purchase card"? You may need to develop a solution to do such postings to the Order (or for purposes of Cost controlling, manual activity allocation similar to confirming work may be desired such as Manual Activity Allocations via CO transactions (KB21N), unless you can cover that with Purchase Requisitions and POs with "F Order" account assignment.
3) MCI8 Cost Report should be suitable for you, once you set up the Value Categories & Cost Key Figures.
See
PMIS Cost Analysis Reporting Overview
Maintenance Cost Key Figures in MCI3 and MCI8 Reports
PM Order Value categories and costs display

Urgent Help in Controlling

Hi All
I have one issue in controlling.
1 hr labour cost is 20 rs..
It will vary depends upon the product manufacturing.
If it changes then it should automatically trigger the value.
How we will go through in controlling..
How it will Config in Controlling
i will assign points

Right.
Option 1:
You can create an Activity type for Labour (T.Code KL01) and assign a rate in the transaction KP26.
However, there is a bit of config that needs to be done and you should ideally speak to a Controlling Consultant for this. You need to assign the Activity Type to a Work Centre, which is in turn assigned to the Cost Centre where you do your KP26 planning.
During the period, the rate will always be what you planned (say, Rs. 20), but at the end of the month, the system calculates the Actual rate (additional config required) and updates the Activity Price (calculates variance and settles).
Option 2:
Alternatively, you can achieve this using Costing Sheets. The Path for that is: IMG --> Controlling --> Product Cost Controlling --> Basic Settings --> Overhead --> Define Costing Sheet and Costing Sheet Components.
You can define Quantity based OH rates and apply these to the service item. This is once again config and you need a CO consultant doing this for you.
Hope this helps.
Cheers.

Activity Type and Cost Relationship Configuration

Hi SAP Gurus,
In ERP, the recipe of Material GN2425A1H, the activity is ZDL - Labour. When the activity time is increased, the material cost does not change, e.g., if labour hour is changed from 1.52HR to 3.4HR, the cost remains unchanged. In case of other materials, if the time of activity ZDL is changed, then the material cost changes accordingly.
Please help me understand the configuration that needs to be checked for activity labour hours with cost associated.
Thanks.

Dear Samir,
I am not sure if such a relation ship exists between Material and Labor.
Normally, the costs are charged independently based on the valuation variant used for the Actual costs in the Process Order (defaulted from order type) ex:Material costs are picked as per the valuation indicator (V/S) from the Material Master when the goods issue is posted to the Process Order.
Labor costs are picked when confirmations are done from the Transaction KP26 (planned prices for activitites) as per the valuation variant.
Kind Regards
Umapathi G

KP26 Planned Actvity

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for