Lines of Amount type 0200 (reduction) not appearing in FMRP_RW_BUDCON

Dear experts,
I would like to ask you about the following incorrect scenario we are facing:
in my client, the PO creates commitment, then the GR recudes that PO commitment and whenever the invoice is created, it reduces the GR commitment.
This would be a normal picture at FMRP_RW_BUDCON for a complete delivered and invoiced PO:
PO       0100     1,000 EUR
PO       0200    -1,000 EUR (at the moment of GR creation)
GR       0100     1,000 EUR
GR       0200    -1,000 EUR (at the moment of the invoice creation) --> this is the missing line
Invoice 0100     1,000 EUR
However, we are having cases in which the line GR 0200 is missing and therefore it is resulting in double Budget consumption.
Do you know what this can be happening?
I am wondering if these missing 0200 lines were ever appearing in the report. Could it be that those lines got missassinged (to unproper combination of Fund Center and Commitment ítem) by the execution of the reconstructions transaccions (FMCD, FMCN, FMCT, FMN4N, FMN0, FMAVCREINIT)? Is there a way to find out if those missing 0200 lines are in the system under any other address?
In case the missing 0200 lines were never created, is there any way to make them appear so that we do not get doublé consumption?
Any help will be very much appreciated.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Mercedes.

Dear Mercedes,
As a premise, I believe you are updating GR and IR in transaction OFUP and you have verified that there are no correction notes for your EA-PS package and component PSM-FM-UP-FI-GR.
As a start, I would check the related FI document generated by the GR posting.
You can use report RFFMS009 for this. This report will show you the FM Account Assignment derived and the one that was posted. This might help you to identify if the reason of missing 0200 records were related to your derivation rules in FMDERIVE.
For the same, you can run FMDERIVE (see note 666322) and post a similar GR to see if the commitment item and the funds center are correct.
It might be the case also that the financial transaction of the commitment item used in the GR reduction is not updating PSM-FM. Please make sure that the financial transaction is equal to 30.
Best Regards, Vanessa.

Similar Messages

  • Output type (TRS0) is NOT appearing in NACE

    Hi Experts,
    when i am doing config for order integration output type (TRS0) is NOT appearing in NACE for V1.
    business function LOG_TM_ORD_INT is active.
    pl suggest.

    make sure you have a condition record for that output type

  • Condion Type "VPRS" should not appear in Sales Order, Inquiry, Contract

    Hi Gurus,
    Normally when you create Sales Order/Inquiry/Contract,  in the Condition Tab VPRS Condition Type will appear and show the cost price of Materail from the Material Master.
    My Client requirement is, VPRS Condition type has to be calculated as "Statistical" Contion but IT SHOULD NOT APPEAR IN THE CONDITIONS TAB IN THE SALES ORDER/INQUIRY/CONTRACT.
    Thanks,
    Bala

    hello, friend.
    try sapnote 105621.  this is about restricting view of condition types (i.e. vprs) in sales orders by creating anauthorization object for cond types..
    i wish to discuss our experience with this, as we had the same business requirement.
    first, we simply deleted vprs from the PP.  this did not affect financial accounting, until the client decided to implement std cost estimates.  we had to bring back vprs.
    now, we did the sapnote, which required joint efforts among SD, ABAP and BASIS.  although we were able to restrict view of vprs in the cond tabs at itm level, this was still visible at header level.  also, a resourceful data encoder can always find ways to view the same in, for example, the document flow or materials movement data.
    however, try this and maybe you will get it right.
    regards.

  • Output types are different in VF02 than in VF03 (A particular output type Z*** does not appear in VF03)

    Hi Experts,
    When I check the billing document (Go to>Header>Output) there are 3 output types. After executing VF02, an output type is added (EDI). Why does this particular output type (Z***) not appear in VF03?
    - What are the related configurations for this?
    - Is this a possible ABAP issue? To my knowledge, custom programs usually do not result to this kind of behavior.
    Thanks in advanced,
    Jack

    Jack Rockefeller wrote:
    I'm not a functional consultant but an ABAP consultant.
    Ah, OK, that explains it. Jack, I'm sorry but it's not quite feasible to explain the whole output determination configuraton in a discussion post. Here is a wiki page if you have some time for reading. It's not very thorough but you could google for more. But it would be more efficient to just ask an SD consultant.
    Also in VF02 look at the Output Determination analysis (it's somewhere in the menu in the Output screen) and see if it makes any sense to you.

  • The fields of type Int 1  not appearing in Infopackage selection

    Hello Gurus,
    I have created a generic datasource on two tables .
    The fields that should be set as Selection fields for the DataSource are the following:
    -     field 1------type char
    -     field  2----
    type char
    -               field 3----
    type Int1
    -     field 4----
    type Int1
    Out of the above four table fields only the two fields  with char datatype are appearing in infopackage selection.
    The other two ie(field 3 and field 4) of datatype Int1  does not appear in infopackage selection.
    I have ticked the check boxes in the selection field of datasource.
    I also get all the four fields available for selection in RSA3(extractor checker tcode).
    Kindly help me in resolving this issue.

    Hi Amol,
    Can you please replicate DS once again and then try creating the infopacage
    Mann

  • Type 1 Fonts not appearing in CS6 apps

    I'm running CS6 on a windows 7 machine. I'm using Extensis Suitcase 11 for WIndows (I know, I know, its old). I have both Type 1 fonts and Open Type fonts installed. The Open Type fonts appear on all apps including other windows apps such as Office. The Type 1 fonts appear in all other apps EXCEPT CS6 apps (InDesign, Illustrator, Photoshop, etc.). I've tried clearing out both the system cache as well as the Adobe cache and I've also cleared the font vault. After doing all that and restarting, the problem was fixed...or so I thought. After logging out at the end of the day and logging back in today, the problem is back. Does anyone know of a solution to this problem? Is it the Suitcase 11 app that might be causing it? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

    Actually there was a known bug in the CS3 applications (but not in the CS4 versions of the same applications) whereby Type 1 fonts installed in the standard Windows font directory (nominally C:\WINDOWS\FONTS\ ) do not show up in the CS application font menus for both Windows Vista 64-bit and Windows 7 64-bit versions. You have two workarounds:
    (1)     Upgrade to CS4 (or very soon, CS5) and the problem does not occur.
    (2)     Install a copy of the .PFB and .PFM files in the private font directory of the CS3 applications.
         - Dov

  • Condition Type VPRS not appearing on some billing items

    Hi,
    I have a discrepancy between COPA and postings on the FI account. In COPA in transaction ke4i I have assigned the SD condition type VPRS - Internal price to the COPA value field VRPRS u2013 Stock Value.
    The problem arises when the outbound delivery is split on several batches. In this case the condition type VPRS does not appear on the invoice for the split billing item and the amount 0 is loaded into to the COPA filed VRPRS for this billing item instead of value that should appear in the VPRS field. And this causes discrepancies between COPA and FI.
    Do you know how to solve this problem? Is it possible to make the condition type VPRS always appear on the invoice, also in case when the delivery is sent in many batches?
    Best regards,
    Marcin

    Hi
    Welcome to the confusing world of Invoice *** batch split.. The situation you are facing is due to incorrect customization of your position types in SD during billing of the batch split. Plz check note 77414
    You can grossly summarize it as below -
    When you have batch split - the line items in Out bound delivery and biling can be divided into 2 types HPOS and UPOS i.e. Main Line items and Sub line items.. The note describes of 3 situations.. Your SD consultant will have to decide which situation you fall in...  based on that config changes have to be made in SD....
    If your billing is done at HPOS level (Main Item) and not at Item splits level or Vice Versa - Then T codes VOV7 and VTFL, you have to make settings accordingly in the fields "Biling Relevance" and "Cost"..
    Also, the item category of HPOS and UPOS has to be different - One has to be relevant for billing/Cost and the other not
    Apart from VOV7 and VTFL, check your settings in T code 0184.. Your Item catg has to be assigned against :
    Delivery Type / usage Type= CHSP/ Item category Group = "Norm"
    To correct the invoices already posted, cancel them and repost after making the config changes...
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Internal Item Number " Items not appearing in Sales order Line form

    Hi,
    We are in 11.5.7 vis. While choosing an item in the Sales order form, only the line items with type 'chargemaster' and 'vendor' appear. The items with type 'Internal item number' doesn't appear anymore. The item validation organization is set to the Master Inventory organization.(V1).
    When i checked the pricelist creation screen, with product attribute - item number, the product value field is empty and greyed out for all the items.
    I compiled the system Items flexfield. I tried adding a new product to the pricelist with product attribute-item number,product value - A000 .All the items (with their internal item numbers) appear while choosing the product, but the product description doesn't default and the field remains empty and greyed out.
    After saving the item in the price list and if i query for this particular item, the product description appears but the product value now becomes empty and greyed out.
    Any explanation as to to why this is behaving so and to rectify the same?
    Regards,
    Nithya

    Hi,
    Check item category determination (VOV4) whether the item category is determine with the combination of  material item
    category group,untill the material being read by the system it will not give the line item no,and also check at VOV8 for your doc
    type Item no.increment Ex: 10, is maintained or not ,if not maintain and try.
    Regards
    Ram

  • Service PO sub line items not appearing in PO print out

    Hi,
    Service PO line items under item details are not appearing on print out...
    Where are they stored ..means in which table?
    Regards

    Hi SSingh,
      Has this problem been solved? we have a similar problem here --- after upgrading from 4.6c to ECC6.0, we found that the service PO line items are not being shown in the PO printout.  This happens for items that have been marked 'delivery complete'.
      How do we get the service lines to print out again?  Appreciate any help out there!

  • Excise condition types not appearing in the Delivery document pricing

    Hi,
    This is a scenario of sales from an Exciseable Plant.
    The client has pricing requirement at delivery document.
    I have configured the pricing at Delivery document, but the Excise condition type (JEXP) does not appear.
    We are maintaine ED values at control code level and control code field is not availabe in LIPS, i tried adding the field in LIPS structure but still the ED condition type does not appear as program is not identifying the control code field in delivery.
    Can you please let me know the solution for bringing Excise condition type in the Delivery document pricing procedure.
    Regards
    Venkat

    Changed the Condition Category from 'F' to 'L'.

  • Fb50 - document type is not appearing

    Dear all,
    what is the procedure to view fb50 document type it is not appearing in production server
    development server i can view that document type
    please guide
    Thanks & Regards,
    satishkumar.m

    HI,
    IN FB50 screen go to editing options in the top, in that select document type displayed, u can be able to see that in FB50.
    regards
    srikanth

  • WHT amount not appearing in FBL1N report for Document type RE

    Dear Friends,
    While running FBL1N report for any vendor where TDS is applicable, the WHT amount is appearing for KR document type. But when it is RE document type the WHT amount is not appearing in the report. How can we resolve this? Any enhancement/any note to be applied?
    Regards,
    Ramkumar

    Hi,
    FBL1N is having the classic withholding tax field hence please don't refer the those fields.
    please don't refer those fields.
    Please review attached note 363309 for detailed explanation.
    BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And
    extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table
    WITH_ITEM.
    You can check in table BSEG for the fields and will find that system
    do NOT update field BSEG-QBSHB.
    In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actully the field
    of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows
    zero in line item display.
    And as note 363309 says,
    "Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information
    from your display variant.
    If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on
    the document number and subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'."
    Regards
    Madhu M
    Edited by: M Madhu on Jan 18, 2012 9:13 AM

  • Condition type not appearing in PO line item

    Dear All
    I made a condition type Y001 for agriculture tax with below mentioned config. and marked as both header and item condition.
    Cond. class   A Discount or surcharge
    Calculat.type A Percentage
    Cond.category B Delivery costs
    Manual entries      C Manual entry has priority
    Now problem is that when I am making contract in contract line item condition Y001 condition is appearing in dropdown and I am able to enter the same in contract and save it.But when I am trying to make a PO by referring the same contract with line item condition Y001, this same condition is not appearing in PO and also it is not appearing in dropdown also so that I can manually enter the same.
    Please let me know why system is behaving like this.
    Regards
    SK

    satish kumar wrote:
    In short condition type Y001 is appearing in contract line item condition tab while making contract but same condition is not appearing in PO line item condition tab while making PO.
    Hi Satish,
    Perhaps you have not assigned the pricing procedure to the Purchasing Orgn & Vendor in IMG Schema determination. Have a chk once and if you have assigned try maintaining a PIR and I hope it should populate the priceing procedure and your cond type Y001 in the PO also.
    Anything pls revert
    Regards
    Shiva

  • My bookmarks used to appear in dropdown menu from the address bar on my iMac G5. I switched to Mac Notebook & from Leopard to Lion. Now my bookmarks are not accessible from the address bar anymore (the line where you type in the website address)

    '''My bookmarks used to appear in dropdown menu from the address bar on my iMac G5. I switched to Mac Notebook & from Leopard to Lion. Now my bookmarks are not accessible from the address bar anymore (the line where you type in the website address)'''

    There appears to be a problem with Firefox 20 with UNC paths when using roaming profiles on a server.
    *[[/questions/955140]] why is the 20.0 address bar unresponsive?
    This is currently investigated and tracked via this bug report.
    *[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=857672 bug 857672] - Address Bar not working (roaming profiles;UNC path support OS.File)
    <i>(please do not comment in bug reports: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html])</i>

  • Amount Rule Type field not appearing in settlement rule screen.

    Hi Experts,
    We developed a program which creates settlement rules automatically on uploading data from excel file.
    We encountered the following error.
    cursor field COBRB-BRTYP does not exist in the screen
    In the Settlement rule screen, under distribution rules, the field amount rule type is not appearing.
    We have 3 level WBS structure. For the 1 level WBS this field is not appearing. But this field is visible for below WBS.
    Please help me..
    Regards,
    Praisty

    Hi Balachandar,
    As i said, we are using an excel sheet upload to create settlement rules for WBS elements.
    While uploading we got this error. COBRB-BRTYP does not exist in the screen.
    Now we need to check with abaper, why the program is checking that field in particular.
    Any way, thanks for your prompt reply.
    Regards,
    Praisty

Maybe you are looking for