Linux 64-bit OS - 32-bit ODBC, libsqora.so.11.1

I have this rpm installed.
$ rpm -qa | grep unixODBC
unixODBC-2.2.11-7.1
Got this error,
/usr/bin/isql -v oragde scott tiger /usr/bin/isql: symbol lookup error: /opt/oracle/product/11.1.0.6/db/lib32/libsqora.so.11.1: undefined symbol: SQLGetPrivateProfileStringW
Just wonder how to test /verify this ODBC driver and my DSN is properly defined?
Thanks

Read this metalink note:
How to Setup and Verify Setup of Oracle ODBC Driver on Linux
Doc ID: Note:404041.1
Werner

Similar Messages

OWB 10g Release 2 from 32 bit to 64 bit on Linux

Hi guys,
I have a client who is planning to migrate their Linux server from 32 bit to 64 bit and migrate their Oracle database from 10.2.0.3 from 32 bit server to 10.2.0.3 from 64 bit server.
We have OWB 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.3) installed in the 32 bit server.
Our DBA is planning to move the entire database to the new server including the OWB repositories.
My question is,
Will the following work?
1. Install the OWB 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.3 or 10.2.0.4) 64 bit in the new 64 bit Linux 64 bit server
2. Remove all the OWB repository user schemas & roles from the database where OWB is installed
3. Install the OWB repository in the new 64 bit server
4. Import the .mdl backup of the project from existing OWB 32 bit to the new OWB 64 bit server
5. Configure the project with the new server
OR
Since our DBA is planning to move the entire database to the new server including the OWB repositories
1. Install the OWB 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.3) 64 bit in the new 64 bit Linux 64 bit server
Will I be able to access my repository that is migrated from the 32 bit server (avoiding the installation of OWB repository and importing the project and configuring the whole project in the new server) ?
Please someone shed some light on this. Your help is appreciated
Thanks in advance....
Edited by: user528846 on Feb 11, 2010 11:59 AM
Edited by: user528846 on Feb 11, 2010 11:59 AM

Does this mean, ... we have to install the OWB 64 bit and install a new repository in the 64 bit server?In my opinion you don't need to create new repository.
After migrating database to 64bit perform steps from Metalink note 434272.1 "How To Update Warehouse Builder 10.2 After A Database Cloning".
It is better to save the same path for new OWB 64bit software. If you install OWB into different path you need to update OWBRTPS table with new path to OWB software (look at metalink note 550271.1).
Regards,
Oleg

Should I use the 64 bit or 32 bit Linux distro for Oracle Service Bus

I'm going to install OSB for the first time on Oracle Linux 5.3 for development use. Does it matter whether I install OSB on the 32 bit or 64 bit version of Oracle Linux?
I've had better luck with 32 bit Linux distros in the past, but if there's a benefit to using the 64 bit distro I'll use it. My hardware has 4 GB of RAM, which I hope is enough for development use.
Thanks.
Dean

I found this post on the Ubuntu forums which indicates trouble running Workshop on ubuntu. Maybe OSB works but Workshop has problems on Ubuntu:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1137863

How to confirm Linux distribution is 32 bit or 64 bit ?

I installed vm ware work station 6.5 on my laptop. Afterr that i install redhat 5.5 on this vm workstation.
Now i am not sure that this Linux distribution is 32 bit or 64 bit.
PLease tell me how i can confirm that .
PLease reply

Herb is right, but let me elaborate, the command returns quite a lot of information.
Here is a typical 32-bit system:
$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-238.5.1.0.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Mar 1 20:34:56 EST 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/LinuxHere is a typical 64-bit system:
$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 7 07:06:44 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/LinuxIt is also possible to run a 32-bit kernel on a 64-bit machine, but I don't have one of those handy.

BIC2G-BI-LINUX 2009 32 or 64 bit?

I've installed BIC2g Linux image successfully and opened it using VMWare.
I've installed it on Windows Server 2008 R2 64 bit and I have 8GB RAM installed.
I have installed VMWare player 64 bit version and it shows 8GB RAM as memory in the "About" section of the player.
But the VMWare seetings for the image, only lets me set RAM upto 3.5 GB.
Is it because the Linux image is a 32 bit one?
cheers
z

jimhallers: How did you do this?
I use Ubuntu 64-bit and when I tried to install, I received an error. (I'm at the office right now, but I'll post the error when I get home.)
The error message is in the terms of "it's not compatible".
This doesn't seem right.
If you could share your install steps, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
--Todd

Linux on 32 and 64 Bits platform ?

Hi,
I have read the "Installation Guide for Linux" for XE. The supported, for instant, operating system are clearly defined but not the type of processors.
My question :
Does XE work on Linux with a 64 Bits processor ?
Thanks for your response
Henri

question - especially for Mr. Townsend but any Oracle people?
The Linux 32 bit versus 64 bit issue is interesting, and there is - at least to me - a related issue about processor cores. If I run XE on an Athlon 64X2 under Fedora, it - if I understand - use one core. Can I run XE on a Sun T2000 with a single CPU? That's eight cores. Or fewer. Where is the "single CPU" definition constrained - if it is - by core considerations?
Still would like to see the x86_64 version :-)

Java Performance: Linux vs Windows, 64 bit vs 32 bit JVM

I am looking for information about how Java performs on Linux vs Windows and how the results are affected when a 64 bit jvm is used.
Disk access or IO are not important, I would really like to see some benchmarks on floating point arithmetic and/or heavy memory access, assuming that on all environments enough physical memory could be addressed so the extra available memory space for 64 bit os'es/jvm's is not important.
I have been searching on Google but didn't find any useful recent results, only some very old stuff.
Does anybody know how the OS and the JVM affect performance? I could imagine that Java VM's are a little less optimized on Linux because of the fact that Linux has a smaller marketshare, but maybe that is not true?
Also I could imagine that 64 bit JVMs could be faster because they could use more cpu registers, on the other hand they could slow down a little because all memory pointers are twice as long so more data should be processed?
Any comments are greatly appreciated!

On the Linux vs Windows theme, you would probably find out, after much browsing & research, that there is no difference in performance or that the difference is too small to be even considered.
On the 32-bit vs 64-bit subject, here's a recent blog that you could look at:
http://dev2dev.bea.com/blog/patel_jayesh_j/archive/2007/09/32bit_or_64bit.html
That blog has some links to some benchmarks, but here again, the differences are unlikely to be earth-shattering.
Not much to add here, other than the most important improvement in performance derive from how the application is designed, and in some cases, how the JVM heap itself is configured, independently on Linux vs Win or 32 vs 64 -bit considerations.
In a case when you would really need to know, there is no general right answer to your question, and you'd have to benchmark your specific application yourself in your specific execution environment to be able to evaluate possible benefits of 64-bit vs 32-bit.
In conclusion, I wouldn't waste much time on all this, and you probably have better things to do yourself.

Change from 32 bit to 64 bit - Linux

Hi All,
Does anyone could help me to find any info about change my Solution Manager/Oracle 9 32 bit to 64 bit?
I looked in Service Marketplace but didn´t find any info ...
thanks a lot!!
Daniela

Check notes 940811, 192822
then this thread:
32 bit to 64 bit upgrade

How to find out if I am using a 32 bits or 64 bits version of JRE?

How to find out if I am using a 32 bits or 64 bits version of JRE?
If I have 2 instances of Java installed in 2 seperate directories, one 32 bits and other 64 bits on Linux. How do I identify which directory holds which version?
Is there any command that can output this info?
Regards,
Billamama

With a Sun JDK or JRE, you can use java -version:
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-b105)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.6.0-b105, mixed mode)
... switch to the 64-bit JDK ...
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-b105)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.6.0-b105, mixed mode)
The last line says "64-Bit."

Upgrading Solaris 10 from 32-bit to 64-bit in a VirtualBox VM

Hello,
I am running 32-bit Sol 10 u5 x86 as a guest in a Sun VirtualBox (Vbox) virtual machine on a 32-bit WinXP host with 64-bit VT-capable Xeon processors, and am considering upgrading Solaris 10 to 64-bit using the latest version of Vbox (2.0.0). After installing WinXP Professional x64 and the 64-bit version of Vbox, will I have to completely re-install Sol 10 to get it to run in 64-bit, or is there some way to get it to 64-bit without a re-install? The Vbox forums suggested that I post this question on a Solaris forum, as they don't know the answer.
They apparently also do not know if Windows XP x64 is a compatible host OS on which to run 64-bit guests. They list only Vista, Linux, and OpenSolaris as supported 64-bit host OSs. Has anyone used WinXP x64 as a host for Vbox 64-bit guests? Due to policy, Vista is not available to me on my system/network.
Thank you...

The x86 installer will place both 32-bit and 64-bit code on the disk.
The loader fired by GRUB will attempt to detect the proper hardware and launch the correct kernel.
Other portions of the upgrade could conceivably cause a problem, but having the CPUs go from 32-bit only to 64-bit capable shouldn't be an issue. You don't have to make any changes.
Darren

Migrating EBS from 32-bit to 64-bit

Hi,
I have a R12 Instance(12.1.3) with 11.1.0.7 database on 32-bit Linux. Now we are planning to do a clone of the existing R12 Instance to a newly created 64-bit Linux server. So i would like to know the steps involved in migrating the E-Business Suite from 32-bit to 64-bit.
Regards,
Vineel.C

I had gone through the Metalink Note[471566.1] which you had sent me. It was useful but internally it had referred to another Note:762669.1 which says in Migrate from Linux 32-bit to Linux 64-bit
h.Upgrade the database from 32-bit to 64-bit (recompile pl/sql modules and change the word size) by running $ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/utlrp.sql. Refer to the usage and notes sections in the script for instructions on how to run it.
But in general utlrp.sql is used for compiling Invalid objects.
Can you elaborate on this.Because of the word size change (from 32-bit to 64-bit), the database objects will be invalidated and you need to run utlrp.sql script to compile them.
Difference between UTLRP.SQL - UTLIRP.SQL - UTLIP.SQL? [ID 272322.1]
Changing between 32-bit and 64-bit Word Sizes [ID 62290.1] -- Step 16. Run utlirp.sql
Thanks,
Hussein

64-bit or 32-bit Intel?

I am assuming these new Intel machines are still the old 32-bit style. Is this correct? What are we sacrificing for back stepping? I work in a PC environment office with my G5 and it's amazing how much clearer and brigher my monitor (we all have the same one) looks next to the others.

Jim,
As as software engineer who has worked in various application and systems areas and over the era of transition from 16-bit to 32-bit hardware, I can only agree with you that choice of hardware must be dictated by the needs of the use to which it will be put. So clearly for today's desktops (and even more so for laptops), 32-bit hardware is certainly adequate. Whether or not disk speeds are a factor also depends on the application. Obviously, database-intensive applications typically run the mass storage devices ragged. Other applications barely touch the disk once the program and its data are loaded.
Anyway, what I really wanted to point out, though you're probably aware of this already, is that the new iMac (Intel dual-core model) and the MacBook Pro both use faster memory and memory buses than any of their predecessors (with the possible exception of the heavy-duty G4 or G5 desktops--I'm not really familiar with their hardware details).
To give you an idea of a result I found surprising (pleasantly so), a theorem prover I've written in Java (a very CPU- and memory-intensive application) runs much faster (about 50% faster) on the iMac with its dual-core 2 GHz processor(s) than it does on the Linux box with an Intel P4 HyperThreading CPU running at 3 GHz. The reason? The RAM and FSB bus on that Linux box are a lot slower than the ones on the iMac. So even though this application, which currently is principally single-threaded (Java apps can always use a processor core for garbage collection), benefits more from the faster FSB and RAM on the iMac than it is hurt by having a processor running only two thirds the speed of the on in the Linux box.
Randall Schulz
iMac 20" Core Duo; MacBook Pro Mac OS X (10.4.5)

10R2 installer 64-bit or 32-bit?

Hi all,
I have some doubts here. I have an installation DVD for Oracle Database 10g R2 for HP-UX Itanium, but I am not sure if it is for 64-bit or 32-bit; it's not printed on the DVD.
I also went to the 10g download page on OTN, again it is not mentioned, not like some other platforms like Linux, Solaris and Windows. I have also checked on 9i download page and on the contrary, there are two links for both HP-UX 32-bit and 64-bit.
How should I set my assumptions? Should it be 32-bit unless mention explicitly for 64-bit. To be installed on an HP-UX Itanium IA64 (64-bit). There are also Itanium 32-bit, but I am not sure if they are quite new and Oracle did not have the installer for the architecture. Kind of confused here.
Please assist, and thanks in advance.
Regards.

You can check platforms and certification on MetaLink if you have a support contract or also at [https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/certify/certify.istore_welcome]
For example, if I navigate through the selection screens for Platform- HP-UX Itanium and Database/Server, I see
Itanium Information
64-bit Oracle database software only supports 64-bit for Itanium. Oracle does not support running the 32-bit database on Itanium.
and then when I scroll down to the Oracle Database Product Versions selection list I see only 64bit versions of 11g, 10gR2, 10g and 9.2
Thus, there is no 32bit version of Oracle on Itanium and the 64bit version is only for 64bit Itanium.
Edited by: Hemant K Chitale on Aug 25, 2008 10:20 AM

Can i install a mix of 32-bit and 64-bit package ? and they work together ?

Customer environment is Linux x86-64 having package pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_4.1.x86_64 installed as per x86-64 server and application requirement.
i.e # rpm -qi pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_4.1
Name : pam Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 0.99.6.2 Vendor: Oracle America
Release : 6.el5_4.1 Build Date: Thu 11 Mar 2010 02:58:52 AM MST
Install Date: Tue 27 Apr 2010 02:12:43 AM MST Build Host: ca-build9.us.oracle.com
Group : System Environment/Base Source RPM: pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_4.1.src.rpm
Size : 2577739 License: GPL or BSD
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Thu 11 Mar 2010 02:59:17 AM MST, Key ID 66ced3de1e5e0159
URL : http://www.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/index.html
Summary : A security tool which provides authentication for applications
Description :
PAM (Pluggable Authentication Modules) is a system security tool that
allows system administrators to set authentication policy without
having to recompile programs that handle authentication.
Now customer is installing other oracle monitoring application which is looking/requesting for 32 bit version of pam-0.99.6.2.6.el5_4.1 (i386), i.e this library
Question:
So, is there any way we can install the 32 bit version of this ? While 64 bit is still there ?
Concern with installing the 32 bit library, is that something picks it up mistakenly when it expects the 64 bit version.
Edited by: sgaraga on Jun 8, 2012 4:39 PM

You can run 32-bit software under a x86-64 OS provided you install the necessary x86 (32-bit) libraries.
The x86_64 CPU is fully backwards compatible with Intel x86 16-bit and 32-bit code. Because the full x86 16-bit and 32-bit instruction sets remains implemented in hardware without any intervening emulation, existing x86 executables run with no compatibility or performance penalties (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64)
An application that is 32-bit or 64-bit will have to be linked or share the appropriate library. 32-bit and 64-bit libraries won't be confused because they use different names.

Upgrading EBS 11.5.9 from 32-bit to 64-bit

my company is planning upgrade EBS 11.5.9 from 32-bit to 64-bit. I have found out in this forum mentioned 11i Apps tier cannot be upgrade to 64-bit. Can we upgrade our oracle database 9.2.0.3.0 from 32-bit to 64-bit? Which version of RHEL can support 9.2.0.3.0? Is there any issue accessing oracle between Apps (32-bit) & DB server (64-bit, if able to upgraded from 32-bit)?
Currently we are using 32-bit RHEL AS 2.1.

user11978534 wrote:
my company is planning upgrade EBS 11.5.9 from 32-bit to 64-bit. I have found out in this forum mentioned 11i Apps tier cannot be upgrade to 64-bit. Correct -- Frequently Asked Questions: Oracle E-Business Suite Support on x86-64 [ID 343917.1]
Can we upgrade our oracle database 9.2.0.3.0 from 32-bit to 64-bit? No.
Which version of RHEL can support 9.2.0.3.0? Check the certification matrix from MOS for the list of supported Linux OS with this database version.
Is there any issue accessing oracle between Apps (32-bit) & DB server (64-bit, if able to upgraded from 32-bit)?
Currently we are using 32-bit RHEL AS 2.1.There should be no issues -- Using Oracle Applications with a Split Configuration Database Tier on Oracle 9i Release 2 [ID 304489.1]
Any reason you are still on 9.2.0.3 and not upgrading to 11gR2?
Thanks,
Hussein

32-bit vs 64-bit JVM, JDK, DLL's

I've got a project that has a couple dependencies:
1. My project interacts with an FTDI USB->Serial converter based device. Access to this device is via DLL(FTDI calls them D2XX drivers). FTDI offers both 32-bit and 64-bit drivers. Please see here .
2. In order to get access to the DLL via Java, I'm using a JNI called [jd2xx|http://bleyer.org/jd2xx/] . I don't know if or how a JNI would change if the DLL used is 32-bit or 64-bit.
My build & run environment was XP/32. Now I want to build/run on Vista64. But I'm confused because there are multiple options for downloading and installing the different parts which make up the system:
1. Netbeans is available for 32-bit and 64-bit. Which JVM should I point Netbeans to?
2. JVM comes in 32-bit or 64-bit.
3. JDK comes in 32-bit or 64-bit.
While I don't think anyone else actually uses my project, I'd like to have both XP/32 support and Vista/64 support. If I must go one way or the other, it's gotta be Vista/64.
I have tried multiple combinations, but I get a variety of errors depending on what's installed. The errors are all related to 32-bit/64-bit conflicts.
Can someone point me down the right path?
Thanks
Keith

I searched fairly thoroughly through the NetBeans GUI to see if I could target a particular platform, like 32-bit vs 64-bit ---- and I didn't find one. While it may not matter for java itself, when java interacts with a native dll, there are obviously implications.Java class files are os-agnostic - there isn't a "32-bit version" or a "64-bit version", they're both the same. What is different is the JVM that you run a class file on. A 32-bit JVM requires the appropriate 32-bit libraries, etc; the same requirement exists for a 64-bit JVM. I don't know if you can tell an IDE to run using one JVM or the other (obviously this would be possible only with 64-bit arch). I do know that the java tool for Linux/Solaris allows the use of a -d32 or -d64 option to specify that, and that the options aren't valid for the Windows java tool. I also know that Eclipse has native dependencies due to SWT, so that probably causes some restrictions. And. as you note, doing somethisng like JNI has "implications".
If you have further questions re NB, you should raise then at a NB site, not here.

Linux 64-bit OS - 32-bit ODBC, libsqora.so.11.1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for