Logical test OK and test interface Fail

Hi Masters,
I have a problem with a message mapping. With the logical function and a xml of DESADV.ORDERS05 for testing , it's works fine. But, with the same values and in the tap TEST XI reports a problem with the same field.
The logical function:
E1ADRM1-PARTNER_Q = 'SP' ?
If OK, a table create with fixvalues to convert E1ADRM1-PARTER_ID to output value with 4 digits.
The result of the table is putted in AKVART.
Please see the link with acrobat file with graphical details, values, etc
[Function Logical OK, Test Fail|http://personales.ya.com/oscarnavas/sap/function_test.pdf]
Thanks in advance.

Hi Oscar,
I really don't want to tell you things you already might know. Forgive me if I do so but to achieve a repeating xml-structure not only the field mapping itself but a graphical mapping of the higher located tag is necessary, too. And this higher tag must not be (1..1) but (1..unbounded) or (0..unbounded).
Example:
HIGHER_TAG (1..unbounded)             ->                         HIGHER_TAG (1..unbounded)
LOWER_TAG_1 (1..1)                                         -
>                       LOWER_TAG_1 (1..1)
LOWER_TAG_2 (1..1)                                         -
>                       LOWER_TAG_2 (1..1)
I hope this solves your problem...
Greetings
Ralph

Similar Messages

Using logic with 003+ and secondary interface

Hello, I currently have a 003 rack + (8 inputs) and a m audio pro fire (8 inputs), and I am trying to get them to work inside logic. I currently have them linked together via optical cable. I know I cannot aggregate using a 003 rack which would fix my issue, but I can only get 8 of the 16 inputs to work.
As of writing this I have not tried the output, I have not gotten that far. Is there a way to make logic understand that there is 16 inputs instead of 8? I have the core audio manager telling me that the 003 rack has 18 ( 16 in 2 out) available and that it's in the ADAT format, but anytime I try to use any input greater than 8 I get no sound.
Does anyone know how to get this to work so I can enable a total of 16 tracks to record?
I'd very much like to switch from pro tools to logic for my projects to be more versatile.
Thanks so much in advance for any answers.

I know exactly what you mean. Unfortunately, I can't offer a solution, just want to express that I have the same requests. A simple, convenient way would be if the quick search bar would follow the same logic as in Google:
     Multiple separate keywords -> AND by default
     Multiple keywords with OR in between -> OR logic
     Multiple words in " " -> The keyword must contain of exactly those words in the same order (which is the default and only option now; unfortunately, it's the one that is required the least)
Yes, there is an advanced search option that does the trick, but as you said, it's very cumbersome to create queries there.
Something in the same direction: Bridge is powered by a MySQL database. So, why is there no way to do a search using an SQL-Query? For those people that work with SQL (and those are quite many, I suppose), this would be a dream!
I know, there is a suggestion forum as well, but posts there are never replied to.
So please, if any developper sees this, consider it for a future release.
One more thing: In the keywords panel, you can use a hierarchy, which is great to make your huge list of keywords more organized. However, in the filter panel, they are all flat and not organized by topic. Would it not be possible to apply the same hierarchy there? After all, the hierarchy IS saved in the metadata: in the XMP part of metadate, there is a field called "HierarchicalSubject" that contains this data. So why not use it??
Best regards
- spitfire
P.S. What is the best place to make suggestions to the developpers? Since the topics in the suggestion forum never get any replies, I don't think it's the right place ...

Iptables and fw-interfaces fails me

iptables -A FORWARD -j fw-interfaces
iptables -A FORWARD -j fw-open
Those two fails me.
iptables v1.3.8: Couldn't load target `fw-interfaces':/usr/lib/iptables/libipt_fw-interfaces.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
iptables v1.3.8: Couldn't load target `fw-open':/usr/lib/iptables/libipt_fw-open.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
pacman -Qi iptables
Name : iptables
Version : 1.3.8-1
URL : http://www.netfilter.org/
License : GPL
Groups : None
Provides : None
Depends On : glibc
Removes : None
Required By : None
Conflicts With : None
Installed Size : 1044,97 K
Packager : Eric Belanger <[email protected]>
Architecture : i686
Build Date : Thu Jul 5 00:21:23 2007 UTC
Build Type : Unknown
Install Date : Thu Nov 15 17:51:39 2007 UTC
Install Reason : Explicitly installed
Install Script : No
Description : A Linux kernel packet control tool
Is there anything i'm missing? I'm following this wiki article http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sim … wall_HOWTO
Do i need to load some modules?
All help is apreciated
Del Pede

*sigh*
I forgot to create the chains
iptables -N fw-interfaces
iptables -N fw-open
I guess i solved it

Logical Test (/SAPAPO/OM03) fails with liveCache-test on LCA incorrect mess

Hi All,
On SCM 5.0 instance, when running logical test transaction (/n/SAPAPO/OM03), I get the following message at the end of the test:
liveCache-test on LCA incorrect.
There is no shortdump or any database errors I can see. Please advice.
Many Thanks,
Regards,
Nisch

Hello Nisch,
You are running SCM 5.0 system, therefore you are SAP customer. Please create the SAP ticket concerning this issue => we could logon via OSS and check the status of your system.
-> If you are running the SCM 5.0 installation, you have to follow the liveCache installation guide and finish all post installation steps, run //om13 -> checks , click on the info box of the red semaphores u2026
     Review the system logs in /nsm21.
     Then you could run /SAPAPO/OM03, it is the test Program for liveCache and LCA, in the liveCache relevant client.
     If it's failed & you don't know the reason of the failure => create the SAP ticket to the component 'BC-DB-LCA'.
Thank you & best regards, Natalia Khlopina

When I run itunes diagnostic tests, I am told secure link to itunes store failed. My firewall is not blocking itunes. I have tried to download two itunes products and these have failed to download properly. What do I do?

When I run itunes diagnostic tests, I am told secure link to itunes store failed. My firewall is not blocking itunes. I have tried to download two itunes products and these have failed to download properly. What do I do?

WIndows Vista and 7 uninstall instructions:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1923
Windows XP instructions:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1925
I would say a removal is necassary! this will not affect the content

[svn:bz-trunk] 16330: QA: Yes - Ran test locally and it was failing but tested condition was true - there is no services-config .xml file

Revision: 16330
Revision: 16330
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-05-26 07:55:41 -0700 (Wed, 26 May 2010)
Log Message:
QA: Yes - Ran test locally and it was failing but tested condition was true - there is no services-config.xml file
Doc: No
Checkintests: NA
Details: Updated expected error message to match current error.
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/NoServicesConfigFileTest/error.t xt

I have uploaded detail.txt at below url.
http://m.uploadedit.com/b041/1413264342685.txt
Hi Mahesh,
According to log file, I find the message ‘The setup100.exe.config file was not found, therefore the DTSWizard and SQLWatson app config files were not replaced’. It seems that the SQL Server setup file is not complete. Please check that if the SQL Server
setup file is corrupted, if it is corrupted, please download it again and reinstall SQL Server 2008 R2.
However, if there’s no problem with the setup file, please check that if there is third-party software such as anti-virus software on your computer blocking the process of SQL Server installation. In addition, make sure that you choose ‘Run as administrator’
to launch the setup and configure SQL Server service accounts appropriately with administrator permission during the installation.
For more details about this error, please review the following similar thread.
http://answers.flyppdevportal.com/categories/sqlserver/sqlsetupandupgrade.aspx?ID=ad794a97-09ae-4aae-9d68-0b06f9af3e16
Thanks,
Lydia Zhang

M-Audio Fast Track USB interface not compatible with Logic Pro X and Yosemite

Hello All!
I've been trying to simply record some guitar and vocal tracks onto the latest version of Logic Pro X. It worked before I downloaded the update of Yosemite, however now, I can't find a solution to my problem. I've tried everything! Installed new drivers onto the M-Audio and even tried to search for a later update of Yosemite. I have read a few things online about how Yosemite doesn't accept 3rd party drivers. So any USB plugged in to the macbook/mac that isn't mac based it doesn't accept.
Please can someone help me solve his issue!
Thankyou!
Felix

I know many, many of us who are running things just fine.
I have to be really honest with you Ben and say... Where are you getting that idea from because it simply isn't so.....
I have a quite large client list of Logic users from all over the world... and of those that have attempted to use Logic Pro X and Yosemite together... over 80% have had to revert back to a previous configuration because of performance and/or stability related issues...
I personally, have on test here at the studios... 7 different Macs ranging from 2010 Mac Mini i7 Servers to 2011 32GB 3.4Ghz iMacs.. to a maxed out 2013 i7 MBP to a top of the line 2014 Mac Pro and all have demonstrated issues regarding performance and stability with LPX and 10.10.x using a variety of different Audio/Midi interfaces, all of which have supposedly 10.10 compatible drivers... and all of which have no such issues running LPX under Mavericks...
Just a quick scan across the various forums.. indicates that very few people are successfully running LPX under Yosemite without performance problems.... so that's why I am asking where you are seeing 'many many people" because I am just not seeing that myself...
Cheers..
Nigel

Help : How to test interface mapping in n:1 scenario

I have a scenario two message interfaces==> one message interface.
Then I new one interface mapping, and choose two source interfaces, one target interface. Also filled the mapping program.
But when switch to the test tab, there is no display about the source and target message.
How to do the test in this kind of scenario?
Thanks a lot!
Edited by: kiki qin on Oct 28, 2008 2:24 PM

Hi
First check in Message mapping first if you have one.
Secondly when you select source or target message while developing message mapping did u get message like No objects found or something.
It should show either error or source message when you test interface mapping in any case.
Thanks
Gaurav

Programming logic test?

Hi,
Im going for a programmer job interview.
I havent been in an interview for a programmer job, but i know there will be a logic test.
do you guys have an example of these logic tests?
or what can kind of information it will be presented to me?
so i will know what to expect from the test.
it will be greatly appreciated to hear of people who have taken this test.
thanks.
Edited by: derok on Dec 16, 2010 5:14 PM

jschell wrote:
abillconsl wrote:
Logic test ...
1. How do you put a giraffe into a refrigerator?
Stop and think about it, and decide on your answer before you scroll down.
The correct answer is:Open the refrigerator, put in the giraffe, and close the door.
This question tests whether you tend to do simple things in an overly complicated way.
Which insures that when they are asked to store a password in the database that
1. It will be stored directly as plain text.
2. There will be zero error handling.
Or that you read 10 million record XML file directly into a String[] in your pgm.
>
>>
2 How do you put an elephant into a refrigerator?
decide on your answer before you scroll down.
Did you say, Open the refrigerator, put in the elephant, and close the refrigerator?
Wrong Answer.
Correct Answer:
Open the refrigerator, take out the giraffe, put in the elephant and close the door.
This tests your ability to think through the repercussions of your previous actions..
So when a database error does show up they will write an exception handler for only that error and only at the place where it occurred.
Or that the next time you need to process a large XML file, you read and write each and every record one at a time and write them out one at a time, while searching for your key.
>>
3. The Lion King is hosting an animal conference. All the animals
Attend .... Except one. Which animal does not attend?
decide on your answer before you scroll down.
Correct Answer : The Elephant.
The elephant is in the refrigerator. You just put him in there.
This tests your memory.. So when the database is hacked (worst case) or a security audit notices it (best case) the developer will whine that they only did what they were told.
Perhaps you notice that you neglected to parameterize(sic) the key and ended up looking for the same key each time the process runs.
>>
4. There is a river you must cross but it is used by crocodiles, and
You do not have a boat. How do you manage it?
decide on your answer before you scroll down.
>
Correct Answer:?
You jump into the river and swim across.
Have you not been listening?
All the crocodiles are attending the Animal Meeting.
This tests whether you learn quickly from your mistakes.And when you are fired from the first job for storing the passwords you will look for a job that doesn't involve databases because obviously the database was the source of the problem.You decide to strip off all XML tags next time you have to process a file before reading it.
Bu true, some things don't scale that well.

Dmesg error.... Test WP failed, assume Write Enabled

Hi all....
there seems to be some kind of error going on. When I type
$dmesg | tail -3
[ 1398.681274] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Test WP failed, assume Write Enabled
[ 1398.683528] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Asking for cache data failed
[ 1398.683542] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
This is repeated throughout the log files. And the funny thing is I don't have anything connected i.e. no usb drives, no secondary hdds. Also,
$df -h /dev/sdb
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev 493M 0 493M 0% /dev
What am I missing here?
Update:
Found a similar thread : https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1059099
Seems like its the card reader afterall.....
Last edited by whzee (2012-02-17 10:06:28)

Looks like the firmware update solved it.

Error message "test page failed to print" in windows 7 ultimate 32 bits

I have installed printer a hp deskjet 1515 in windows 7 ultimate 32 bits and it is successfully installed, however when I tried to test print out there showed message "test page failed to print. Would you like to view the print troubleshooter
for assistance?". I tried to clicked Yes and running the troubleshooter until completed but the result still the same showed the same message above when test print again.
Please need assistance how to solve this problem
Thanks
Sopyan

Hi Sopyan,
On current situation, please refer to following steps and check if help us to troubleshoot this issue.
1. Please check if use the correct printer driver and also check if need to update it.
2. Please check if firewall was enabled or third-party security application ran. Please temporarily disable them and monitor the result.
3. Please use another administrator account to logon and print again, then check if this issue still exist.
4. Please open Event Viewer and check if find some relevant events or errors.
If any update, please feel free to let us know.
Best regards,
Justin Gu
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Test-CsGroupExpansion Failed

Hi All,
I ran Test-CsGroupExpansion in all my three FE servers but all failed with below error,
the server was unable to process the request due to an internal error, For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults on the server in order to send the exception information back to client, or turn
on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET frame SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs.
could you share with me if you have any solution. many appreciation. thanks
Best Regards
Thomas

Hi,
Did the other Lync Server function work normally?
Please check if Lync Services started on FE Servers. Then check if only this command “Test-CsGroupExpansion” failed or all other Lync command failed as well.
If the issue only happen for this command, please include the Verbose parameter, such as following:
Test-CsGroupExpansion -TargetFqdn "atl-cs-001.litwareinc.com" -GroupEmailAddress "[email protected]" –Verbose
If the issue happen for all Lync command,
Please make sure CMS replication update to the latest status.
Please make sure Lync Server update to the latest version and then test again.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2010 MP : Some Client Access test cmdlets failed to run

Hi all,
This error is triggered in SCOM 2012 R2 about a single Exchange 2010 SP3 server :
Exchange 2010 MP : Some Client Access test cmdlets failed to run.
When I dig into the error context, I can see it's about the cmdlet "Test-CalendarConnectivity -TestType:External".
The TechNet
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh377605(v=exchg.140).aspx proposes to verify that the URL for the external virtual directory can be accessed by running the Test-OwaConnectivity.
OK.
But what sould I specify for the parameter -MailBoxCredential required for Test-OwaConnectivity -URL my_url -MailBoxCredential ?
Thank you.
Have a good day.
FXE

Hi,
Under Administration, run as configuration, profiles, you can check Default action account.
Local system is the account account for agents by default, you can change to use another account.
Regards,
Yan Li
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Testing Autodiscover failed

We are running Exchange 2007 on Windows 2008 and planning to move to Office 365. However, we can't do it because Exchange 2007 Autodiscover issue.
When we test it from
www.testexchangeconnectivity.com, we receive
Testing Autodiscover failed wth these details:
1. The SSL certificate failed one or more certificate validation checks.
2. Certificate name validation failed.
We don't have problem to access the OWA. When I check the certificate on OWA website, it is correct. I can login
https://autodiscover.ourdomain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml. Here is the get-exchangecertificate information:
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>get-exchangecertificate | fl
AccessRules
: {System.Security.AccessControl.CryptoKeyAccessRule, System
.Security.AccessControl.CryptoKeyAccessRule, System.Securi
            ty.AccessControl.CryptoKeyAccessRule}
CertificateDomains : {remote.ourdomain.com, www.remote.ourdomain.com}
HasPrivateKey
: True
IsSelfSigned
: False
Issuer
: SERIALNUMBER=07969287, CN=Go Daddy Secure Certification Au
                thority, OU=http://certificates.godaddy.com/repository, O=
"GoDaddy.com, Inc.", L=<st1:city w:st="on">Scottsdale</st1:city>, S=<st1:state w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Arizona</st1:place></st1:state>, C=US
NotAfter
: 4/8/2019 2:47:53 PM
NotBefore
: 4/8/2009 2:47:53 PM
PublicKeySize
: 1024
RootCAType
: ThirdParty
SerialNumber
: 02BFCE2827
Services
: IMAP, POP, IIS, SMTP
Status
: Valid
Subject
: CN=remote.ourdomain.com, OU=Domain Control Validated, O=rem
ote.ourdomain.com
Thumbprint
: 9BFF2C1C6F99785A97CA19A1B50D942EE4CF3273
AccessRules
: {System.Security.AccessControl.CryptoKeyAccessRule, System
.Security.AccessControl.CryptoKeyAccessRule, System.Securi
ty.AccessControl.CryptoKeyAccessRule, System.Security.Acce
ssControl.CryptoKeyAccessRule}
CertificateDomains : {DC, DC.ourdomain.local}
HasPrivateKey
: True
IsSelfSigned
: True
Issuer
: CN=DC
NotAfter
    : 4/8/2010 2:41:04 PM
NotBefore
: 4/8/2009 2:41:04 PM
PublicKeySize
: 2048
RootCAType
: Unknown
SerialNumber
: 647A4A520EBA0582441BF33F595AE7A0
Services
: SMTP
Status
: Invalid
Subject
: CN=DC
Thumbprint
: 43780186DDBE3034DD6565E932DBF2EC94238950
How do you verify the certificate and autodiscover are setup correctly?
Bob Lin, MCSE & CNE Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net How to Install and Configure Windows, VMware, Virtualization and Cisco on http://www.HowToNetworking.com

Hi,
According to the result of get-Exchangecertificate, the name autodiscover.domain.com isn't in the certificate( the property CertificateDomains shows the names in one certificate).
Additionally, I'd like to confirm if there is any SRV record in the Exchange 2007 environment for Autodiscover connection. If there is no SRV record, we need to add the name autodisocver.domain.com in the certificate.
And if there is no inconvenience for you, I'd like to confirm the result of your ExRCA test.
Thanks,
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Test-FederationTrust Failed to request delegation token

When running the Test-FederationTrust cmdlet on a CAS server running Exchange 2010 SP1 (RU5v1) I get an error saying that there was an issue getting a delegation token.
The actual output is here:
RunspaceId : 93c95e81-7679-4937-8c78-dc29e3bab37a
Id : FederationTrustConfiguration
Type : Success
Message : FederationTrust object in ActiveDirectory is valid.
RunspaceId : 93c95e81-7679-4937-8c78-dc29e3bab37a
Id : FederationMetadata
Type : Success
Message : The federation trust contains the same certificates published by the security token service in its federat
ion metadata.
RunspaceId : 93c95e81-7679-4937-8c78-dc29e3bab37a
Id : StsCertificate
Type : Success
Message : Valid certificate referenced by property TokenIssuerCertificate in the FederationTrust object.
RunspaceId : 93c95e81-7679-4937-8c78-dc29e3bab37a
Id : StsPreviousCertificate
Type : Success
Message : Valid certificate referenced by property TokenIssuerPrevCertificate in the FederationTrust object.
RunspaceId : 93c95e81-7679-4937-8c78-dc29e3bab37a
Id : OrganizationCertificate
Type : Success
Message : Valid certificate referenced by property OrgPrivCertificate in the FederationTrust object.
RunspaceId : 93c95e81-7679-4937-8c78-dc29e3bab37a
Id : TokenRequest
Type : Error
Message : Failed to request delegation token.
I re-ran the cmdlet with the 'verbose' parameter and got the following:
VERBOSE: [12:49:06.110 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Beginning processing &
VERBOSE: [12:49:06.110 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Instantiating handler with index 0 for cmdlet extension agent "Admin
Audit Log Agent".
VERBOSE: [12:49:06.110 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Current ScopeSet is: { Recipient Read Scope: {{, }}, Recipient Write
Scopes: {{, }}, Configuration Read Scope: {{, }}, Configuration Write Scope(s): {{, }, }, Exclusive Recipient
Scope(s): {}, Exclusive Configuration Scope(s): {} }
VERBOSE: Testing Federation Trust
VERBOSE: [12:49:06.110 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Resolved current organization: .
VERBOSE: [12:49:06.126 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Searching objects "extest_5580e4a3ff4a4" of type "ADUser" under the
root "$null".
VERBOSE: [12:49:06.126 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Previous operation run on global catalog server
'server.domain.net'.
VERBOSE: [12:49:06.141 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Requesting Federation Metadata from
https://nexus.microsoftonline-p.com/FederationMetadata/2006-12/FederationMetadata.xml.
VERBOSE: [12:49:06.704 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Parsing Federation Metadata:
<fed:FederationMetadata>
<SNIPPED>
</fed:FederationMetadata>
VERBOSE: [12:49:06.704 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Retrieved Token Issuer Uri from Federation Metadata:
urn:federation:MicrosoftOnline.
VERBOSE: [12:49:06.704 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Retrieved Token Issuer Certificate from Federation Metadata:
B02FEAAC45742783AA61FC8DB7D0C5E0FF415239.
VERBOSE: [12:49:06.704 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Retrieved Token Issuer Previous Certificate from Federation
Metadata: 089D50FCF27AE9642BFCD95384FD0BB9C14427A4.
VERBOSE: [12:49:06.704 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Retrieved Token Issuer End Point from Federation Metadata:
https://login.microsoftonline.com/extSTS.srf.
VERBOSE: [12:49:06.704 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Retrieved Web Requestor Redirect End Point from Federation Metadata:
https://login.microsoftonline.com/login.srf.
VERBOSE: [12:49:07.423 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Failed to request delegation token. Reason: <S:Fault
xmlns:S="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"><S:Code><S:Value>S:Sender</S:Value><S:Subcode><S:Value>wst:InvalidReq
uest</S:Value></S:Subcode></S:Code><S:Reason><S:Text xml:lang="en-US">Invalid
Request</S:Text></S:Reason><S:Detail><psf:error
xmlns:psf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/Passport/SoapServices/SOAPFault"><psf:value>0x80048820</psf:value><psf:internal
error><psf:code>0x80047867</psf:code><psf:text>Server received a SAML token from an unrecognized issuer.
</psf:text></psf:internalerror></psf:error></S:Detail></S:Fault>
Microsoft.Exchange.Net.WSTrust.SoapFaultException: Soap fault exception received.
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.WSTrust.SoapClient.Invoke(IEnumerable`1 headers, XmlElement bodyContent)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.WSTrust.SecurityTokenService.IssueToken(DelegationTokenRequest request)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Management.SystemConfigurationTasks.TestFederationTrust.GetDelegationToken(ADUser user, Uri
target, SecurityTokenService securityTokenService)
RunspaceId : 93c95e81-7679-4937-8c78-dc29e3bab37a
Id : FederationTrustConfiguration
Type : Success
Message : FederationTrust object in ActiveDirectory is valid.
RunspaceId : 93c95e81-7679-4937-8c78-dc29e3bab37a
Id : FederationMetadata
Type : Success
Message : The federation trust contains the same certificates published by the security token service in its federat
ion metadata.
RunspaceId : 93c95e81-7679-4937-8c78-dc29e3bab37a
Id : StsCertificate
Type : Success
Message : Valid certificate referenced by property TokenIssuerCertificate in the FederationTrust object.
RunspaceId : 93c95e81-7679-4937-8c78-dc29e3bab37a
Id : StsPreviousCertificate
Type : Success
Message : Valid certificate referenced by property TokenIssuerPrevCertificate in the FederationTrust object.
RunspaceId : 93c95e81-7679-4937-8c78-dc29e3bab37a
Id : OrganizationCertificate
Type : Success
Message : Valid certificate referenced by property OrgPrivCertificate in the FederationTrust object.
RunspaceId : 93c95e81-7679-4937-8c78-dc29e3bab37a
Id : TokenRequest
Type : Error
Message : Failed to request delegation token.
VERBOSE: [12:49:07.423 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Admin Audit Log: Entered Handler:OnComplete.
VERBOSE: [12:49:07.423 GMT] Test-FederationTrust : Ending processing &
I have removed/deleted the federation and re-created it several times to no avail.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Luke

Hi All,
I have faced the same issue in test-federationtrust, to solve this issue i have tried mentioned links only. it works for me !!!
Issue Description:
Issue1:
Id         : FederationMetadata
Type       : failed
Issue 2:
Id         : TokenRequest
Type       : Error
Message    : Failed to request delegation token.
http://russburden.wordpress.com/category/microsoft-federation-gateway/
http://vanhybrid.com/2014/01/12/freebusy-in-a-hybrid-environment-fail-and-test-federationtrust-returns-error-failed-to-validate-delegation-token/
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2555008
http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/158/t/5598.aspx
First of all, we are facing this issue, where Internet connectivity of Exchange Hybrid Server is coming from Webproxy, so need to define Webproxy in Exchange Powershell
First Exchange Powershell will be
Set-ExchangeServer -Identity Exchhub01 -InternetWebProxy
http://10.10.10.10:3120/
Note: Change Exchange Servername and Proxy IP and Port no as per your enviornment.
Second Command will be
Get-FederationTrust | Set-Federationtrust -RefreshMetaData
Third Command Will be
Test-FederationTrust
or
Test-FederationTrust -UserIdentity <OnPremisesMailbox> -verbose
Note: Test-federation trust will show you the status of Federation Certificate, it should be valid, it takes 5-8 hours to become valid from ExpiryThanks
Kirpal Singh

Logical test OK and test interface Fail

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for