Maintenance orders are created for FL/equipment only ?

Hi all,
"maintenance orders are created for FL/equipment only".
How can i to understander this sentence, i use t-code: iw31 to create a maintenance order, and the 'Assembly' field can be entered. so how can i to create a maintenance order just for FL/equipment only ?
Thanks and best regards,
Ivy Lu

Hi Praveen,
It's not a message. i got this sentence from the following information:
Q7: When you maintain an assembly in a piece of equipment, is it possible to get maintenance history of the assembly? Do you have to create it as a piece of equipment?
A7: As maintenance orders are created for FL/equipment only, maintenance history can only be tracked at that level, not at assembly level. Assemblies are mere structuring devices to have spare parts linked to an equipment in a structured manner. However, in PM orders, you can mention the assembly along with the FL/Eq. Depending on your reporting needs, an ABAPer could use the 'PM Assembly' field in PM orders.
Best regards,
Ivy Lu

Similar Messages

MPS run, planned orders were created for all levels ?

Hello PP members
I ran a small scenario
material    MRP Type     Low Level    SG           M/T Type
A      M0         000             40              FERT
B               PD              001              40             HALB
c               PD              002               10             ROH
Maintained PIRs(MD61) for material A, and ran MD41( Single Item Multi level Planning)
As material A is an MPS item, I was expecting that it should create planned orders only for material A, but in this MPS run it created planned orders for material B & C. (Looked into MD04, where I see planned orders were created
for all the levels)
As per the MPS run, it will plan only for one level of BOM (in this scenario for material A)
Any suggestions, why planned orders were created for material B & C
please clarify

Just check
System must have created a dependent requirement planned order and not the planned order for requirement you put in demand management for B and C
i.e. if you enter a demand in MD61 for B and C, run the transaction, system will not consider this requirement during MPS run. MPS run will consider the requirement if the requirement for the child is comming from parement where parent is MPS item.
Hence you need to run MRPm for B amd C if teh requirement(not dependdent requirement from A) is to be considered.
I hope you are clear
Edited by: Rajesha Vittal on Jan 28, 2008 8:06 AM

Two idocs are created for one output message type

hi all,
we are communicating our sap idocs to external system using ALE.It is working smoothly.
Our problem raises here,
.idocs are creating at the time of output type attachment for purchase orders.But rarely,two idocs are creating for one message type.It means two idocs are created for same Purchase order.It makes complications for the external system.
anyone can help me pls?
thnks in advance..........

thanks jurgen for ur reply,
jurgen, the second idoc is not an "ORDCHG",It is the replica of first idoc.This one has also "ORDERS" message type.The only difference between these idocs are the time.It means the difference between the time field segments of these idocs have only three(3)seconds difference.We think that its from the system error.If it is not from the system error pls give me the explanation.
thanks in advance.......

Extra plan order are created

Hi PP expert
I am facing following prob.
*Mrp type- M3*
*stategy-30(LSF)*
*lot sze procedure - Fixed (1500)*
When cust. Req. come and we run Mrp sytem create extra plan order (3 nos.) after plannig time fence.
So plz tell me why ?
Nitu....

Dear,
The Purpose of Planning strategy 30 is, to Produce for major customers based on the sale order lot size.
However u can plan addtional requirements using the demand management by creating PIR. System will create planned order as in net requirement planning.
Since Becuse requirement type for indep requirements (LSF) defined for Strategy 30 at SPRO.
If u donot want to system allow to create PIR & Planned order create new strategy by copying SG 30 & remove thy requirement type of ind requirement (LSF). and try.
The strategy 30 is production by lot. This falls under MTS scenario only.
But the production plan is created depending on the lot size. Whether it is PIR or CIR they are group till it becomes the required lot size and then only the planned orders are created.
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

How many SECONDARY INDEXES are created for CLUSTER TABLES?

how many SECONDARY INDEXES are created for CLUSTER TABLES?
please explain.

There seems to be some kind of misunderstanding here. You cannot create a secondary index on a cluster table. A cluster table does not exist as a separate physical table in the database; it is part of a "physical cluster". In the case of BSEG for instance, the physical cluster is RFBLG. The only fields of the cluster table that also exist as fields of the physical cluster are the leading fields of the primary key. Taking again BSEG as the example, the primary key includes the fields MANDT, BUKRS, BELNR, GJAHR, BUZEI. If you look at the structure of the RFBLG table, you will see that it has primary key fields MANDT, BUKRS, BELNR, GJAHR, PAGENO. The first four fields are those that all cluster tables inside BSEG have in common. The fifth field, PAGENO, is a "technical" field giving the sequence number of the current record in the series of cluster records sharing the same primary key.
All the "functional" fields of the cluster table (for BSEG this is field BUZEI and everything beyond that) exist only inside a raw binary object. The database does not know about these fields, it only sees the raw object (the field VARDATA of the physical cluster). Since the field does not exist in the database, it is impossible to create a secondary index on it. If you try to create a secondary index on a cluster table in transaction SE11, you will therefore rightly get the error "Index maintenance only possible for transparent tables".
Theoretically you could get around this by converting the cluster table to a transparent table. You can do this in the SAP dictionary. However, in practice this is almost never a good solution. The table becomes much larger (clusters are compressed) and you lose the advantage that related records are stored close to each other (the main reason for having cluster tables in the first place). Apart from the performance and disk space hit, converting a big cluster table like BSEG to transparent would take extremely long.
In cases where "indexing" of fields of a cluster table is worthwhile, SAP has constructed "indexing tables" around the cluster. For example, around BSEG there are transparent tables like BSIS, BSAS, etc. Other clusters normally do not have this, but that simply means there is no reason for having it. I have worked with the SAP dictionary for over 12 years and I have never met a single case where it was necessary to convert a cluster to transparent.
If you try to select on specific values of a non-transparent field in a cluster without also specifying selections for the primary key, then the database will have to do a serial read of the whole physical cluster (and the ABAP DB interface will have to decompress every single record to extract the fields). The performance of that is monstrous -- maybe that was the reason of your question. However, the solution then is (in the case of BSEG) to query via one of the index tables (where you are free to create secondary indexes since those tables are transparent).

Where to see activities, which are created for the campaign with target group

Hi
I have created a Communication Method in SPRO -> CRM -> Marketing -> Marketing Planning & Campaign Management -> Campaign Executtion - Define Communication Method : Activity has been configured
Activities are not appearing after creation of campaign with target group.
Where to see activities, which are created for the campaign with target group?
Regards
Hamid

Hello,
alternatively to check table CRMD_ORDERADM_H directly you can use the related transactions search for the campaign:
This should bring all activities generated by the campaign. If this is empty first check the job log of the campaign execution job again:
This gives information if any target group members have business transactions created. If the log does not contain the required information you can debug from SM37. The business transactions (activities, leads, sales orders) are generated from function module CRM_MKTTGGRP_PROC_CREATE.
best regards,
Johannes

Determining what views are created for certain structure

Hi!
I need to create some views to structure in Development system as it is done in Production system already. It is something like manual transfer of structure and it's views from Production to Developement system (special case).
My question is this: how to determine what views are created for certain structure?
Will reward,
Mindaugas

Use 'Where-used' list for that structure.
Go to SE11.
Enter the structure name.
click on the Where-used list button in the toolbar.
Select the applicable options. (In your case 'Views')

Scheduling for certain Equipment only from a maint. plan

Hello,
I have maintained many Equipment as separate line item in a Main. Plan. While scheduling, I donèt see option to select certain Equipment only.
I would like to maintain one or few main. plan, one each for a set of equipment. And then call a few from that one set of equipment. E.g. Total Equipment 120,000. 10 types each 120,000. Thus 10 maint. plans. Call Type I/Maint. Plan 1 and Schedule 1-10,000 on Jun 1. Call Type 2/Main Plan 2 and Schedule 10,001-20,000 on Jul 1 and so on.
Any suggestion please!

There is no way to do equipment wise scheduling in IP30. you have to create separate maintenance plans equipment wise and try using sort field in additional so that you can schedule maintenance plan bit easily.

Multiple production orders are generated for same requirement

hello guru's
For a MTO (make to Order) scenario, where the Material requirement quantities are generated from Sales Orders.
Ex: Sales Order created for 500 Qty.
I had run the MRP using MD03 with the following parameters
Processing key              NETCH      Net Change in Total Horizon
Create purchase req.     1                  Purchase requisitions in opening period
Delivery schedules       3                  Schedule lines
Create MRP list            1                  MRP list
Planning mode              1                  Adapt planning data (normal mode)
Scheduling                    1                  Determination of Basic Dates for Planned
System had generated Planned Orders for Qty 500 and these are converted to Production order for Qty 500 for which the Purchase Order for 500 are created.
Goods receipt of 480 has been made against the Purchase Order for the Ordered 500 Qty.
When I re-run the MD03 the system is generating the new Production Order Qty 0f 20 which is not supposed to be as this 20 Qty was already part of the existing Purchase Order and yet to be delivered .
Could you please explain me why this is happening?
regards

Dear,
MRP will consider the firmed PR for the completion date contained in the PR. If the requirements date is different, then MRP will create a new proposal (PR).
If you wish for MRP to RESCHEDULE the dates of existing firmed purchase reqs, instead of just creating new proposals, you have to set the Rescheduling horizon. OPPQ> Rescheduling (plant) or OPPR >Recheduling Horizon (MRP Groups). Start with a small horizon, Also check the tick mark for firm reciept there.
Are you getting any expection message in front of PR?
MRP will 'assume' rescheduling by configuration, by managing the rescheduling horizon, and by setting the rescheduling tolerances. These config can be found in
OPPQ select Rescheduling
or, for MRP groups
Please check and come back.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/EN/f4/7d2c9744af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

How many new tax type and tax code are created for change in TDS

Hello Gurus.
we are using SAP since more than one year.
now tDS rate is change , so i would like to know How many new tax type and Tax Code is created in our system
and also like to know At what percentage i will crete that new tax code.
we have pair of tax type and tax code as shown in Example( for Interest) below
Tax type        Tax code           Name
I1      IC      Sec 194A - Interest on deposits
I1      IO      Sec 194A - Interest on deposits OT
I2      IC      Sec 194A - Interest on deposits Surcharg
I3      IC      Sec 194A - Interest on deposits EC& SHEe
I3      IO      Sec 194A - Interest on deps EC& SHEe OT
I4      IC      Sec 194A - Interest on deposits Pymt
I4      IO      Sec 194A - Interest on deposits Pymt OT
I5      IC      Sec 194A - Interest on dep Pymt Surcharg
I6      IC      Sec 194A - Interest on dep Pymt EC& SHEe
so how namy additional reuire to create new tax type and code more.
i am waiting your reply.
Regard,
Riten patel
Edited by: riten patel on Oct 29, 2009 10:23 AM
Edited by: riten patel on Oct 29, 2009 10:23 AM
Edited by: riten patel on Oct 29, 2009 10:33 AM

Hello Hansachechani
we have followinng   tax key
115O     Dividend 115O(1)
192B     Salary
194A     Interest income other than securities
194C     Payment to contractors
194H     Commission
194I     Rent
194J     Prof/Technical services
195     Payment to foreign nationals
206C     Tax Collected at Sources (Scrap)
ST     Service Tax
and we have followig tax type
C4     Sec 194H Commission Payment
C5     Sec 194H Commission Pymt Surcharge
C6     Sec 194H Commission Pymt EC & SHE Cess
D4     Sec 115O(1) Dividend Payment
D5     Sec 115O(1) Dividend Pymt Surcharge
D6     Sec 115O(1) Dividend Pymt EC & SHE Cess
F4     Sec 195 Foreign Prof fees Payment
F5     Sec 195 Foreign Prof fees Pymt Surcharge
F6     Sec 195 Foreign Prof Fees Pymt E&HS Cess
G1     Service Tax on GTA
G2     Service Tax on GTA E Cess
G3     Service Tax on GTA S&HE Cess
I4     Sec 194A Int on Deposit Payment
I5     Sec 194A Int on Deposit Pymt Surcharge
I6     Sec 194A Int on Deposit Pymt EC & SHE Ce
L4     Sec 194C Contractors Payment
L5     Sec 194C Contractors Payment Surcharge
L6     Sec 194C Contractors Payment EC&S HE Ces
P4     Sec 194J Professional Payment
P5     Sec 194J Professional Pymt Surcharge
P6     Sec 194J Professional Pymt EC & SH E Ces
R4     Sec 194I Rent Payment
R5     Sec 194I Rent Payment Surcharge
R6     Sec 194I Rent Payment E Cess & SH E Cess
So Is it necessary to create new tax key and tax type?
wheather i create new tax code only?
I ma waiting your reply.
Regard,
Riten patel

BPC 7 MS: Which SQL statements are created for writing with input schedule?

Hi,
I wanted to know which SQL statements are created and executed if a user submits values using an Excel input schedule to an application.
When I check the correspoinding MS SQL server log files, I see that data is read from the three partitions belonging to the application and put into a temporary table, but I can't find anything about writing back to the application (presumably the WB partiton...) in the log.
There are some cryptic entries in the log file as well, but they are not human-readale... are there any BPC logfiles that could tell me which SQL statements are created and executed to write back the new values to the application? Thanks!

Hi,
As far as i know, when a user send data entry from an excel schedule, it will be written in the WB table of the application (for each application, you have 3 Data tables : WB, Fact2 and Fact).
I presume that the SQL statement may be an INSERT or UPDATE statement.
Technically, the update is done by the send governor service (hosted on your BPC application server).
There is no log that will show you the SQL Statement besides a SQL trace that you have to setup in SQL Server 2005 Manager Studio.
btw, the data are written in the Relationnal database but are read from the OLAP cube. The olap Cube is split in 3 partitions (ROLAP on WB table / and MOLAP on fact and fat2). Wich mean that every new entry in WB will be automatically "updated" in the cube.
Some DM packages can directly write data in fact2 table. In this case you need to reprocess the cube to get it loaded.

Apple ID created for Free Apps only for daughter's use.

I have created an apple id but I don't want to provide credit card info, how can I complete the review so my daughter can use her iTouch for free apps only?.

Creating an iTunes Store, App Store, iBooks Store, and Mac App Store account without a credit card

Transfer Order auto create for Posting Change not working

Hello Gurus -
When we release an inspection lot from "Q" status, it creates a posting change notice, and we have it configured to create a TO in the background to the same bin, and auto confirm. The desired and intended result is to take something from "Q" status to unrestricted status, while keeping it in the same bin - and avoiding the user having to deal with the transfer orders. Essentially it is seamless and all in the background, the user just sees that he has changed something from quality status to unrestricted.
It works fine when the entire quantity is selected for the usage decision, but when a partial usage decision is made, the transfer order does not create - and requires processing in LU04 for the posting change.
Why would this work for an entire qty, but not work for a partial qty - and simply require someone to go in to LU04 and hit "create transfer order" - with no additional information?
Any help would be most appreciated. Does it have something to do with a setting of quants?

Hi,
In case of a usage decision for a partial quantity, it is not possible to create the Transfer Order for the generated posting change notice automatically. This is only possible when the full quantity is released. The same happens if you release a partial quantity and post the rest to blocked stock or scrap. The reason is, there needs to be a user decision, which part of the quantity has to be posted, this is necessary for example when the quantity is distributed in the warehouse over many storage bins. But even if the full quantity is on one storage bin, there is no automatic TO creation. You can see this also in the online
processing (LT05), in case of partial quantities you have to enter the selected quantity in the quant list, for a full posting this is not necessary.
Hope this helps,
Sinéad Curran

Limited threads are created for my databse connection

Hi,
I have my web applicaton running with the mysql as my database. some part of my application has jsps retrieving and displaying some data(I am right now moving the data retrieval part in jsp to bean classes). Till I complete the work on beans I will have my jsps calling the connection and executing the task.
The following is the bean that gets connection to DB
package con;
import java.beans.*;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.sql.*;
import java.util.*;
public class Myconn extends Object implements Serializable {
   public Connection con;
   public Connection getConnected() {
       connection();
        return con;
public void connection()
             try
               Class.forName("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver");
               con = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mydb?jdbcCompliantTruncation=false&zeroDateTimeBehavior=convertToNull", "mydb", "data");
             catch(SQLException e)
                 System.out.println(e);
                 catch(ClassNotFoundException e){
                   System.out.println("unable to load"+ e);
}The problem is when I check the mysql administrator always it shows only 5 active threads executing 5 queries at an instance(application will be simultaneously used by more than 50 users) also if one thread(which means query) takes more time then it pulls other threads also and this slows down my application.
in my jsps I call the bean as below:
<jsp:useBean id="mycon" class="con.Myconn"/>
Connection connection = mycon.getConnected() ();
         statement = connection.createStatement();
.any help on this please

Your example was a bit confusing, but here are some tips:
- If you have one database server, yes, running multiple queries on it will probably make each one slower than if only one were running.
- Are you creating a new thread for every query? Try making a thread pool so that you only have X number of queries at once, but none of them need to reconnect, which takes time.
- In the end, you may need to optimize your database.
Can you give a better example of what exactly is going wrong?

Two order are creating in multisite environment

HI Guys,
we have multisite environment in our application one is .com site another is .in site
for both sites we are using same ear file but
while creating orders we are getting two different orders for both sites
we are getting different orders for each site
how it is possible in atg

Response to below query:
how it is possible in atg
If both sites are not sharing shopping cart, Both will create their own order.
So assuming when u are refering to shoppingcart.current, since there is no order, It's creating new order.
Refer this Oracle ATG Web Commerce - Sharing Data
Thanks,
Nitin.

Maintenance orders are created for FL/equipment only ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for