MPS run, planned orders were created for all levels ?

Hello PP members
I ran a small scenario
material    MRP Type     Low Level    SG           M/T Type
A      M0         000             40              FERT
B               PD              001              40             HALB
c               PD              002               10             ROH
Maintained PIRs(MD61) for material A, and ran MD41( Single Item Multi level Planning)
As material A is an MPS item, I was expecting that it should create planned orders only for material A, but in this MPS run it created planned orders for material B & C. (Looked into MD04, where I see planned orders were created
for all the levels)
As per the MPS run, it will plan only for one level of BOM (in this scenario for material A)
Any suggestions, why planned orders were created for material B & C
please clarify

Just check
System must have created a dependent requirement planned order and not the planned order for requirement you put in demand management for B and C
i.e. if you enter a demand in MD61 for B and C, run the transaction, system will not consider this requirement during MPS run. MPS run will consider the requirement if the requirement for the child is comming from parement where parent is MPS item.
Hence you need to run MRPm for B amd C if teh requirement(not dependdent requirement from A) is to be considered.
I hope you are clear
Edited by: Rajesha Vittal on Jan 28, 2008 8:06 AM

Similar Messages

  • No Documents were created for in this run

    Dear Friends:
    Using T.code AFAB,I entered Co.code,Fiscal year 2006,depreciation run-003,planned post run,list of assets.
    I got the message.
    Error Analysis was ended, Refer to error log
    No Documents were created for in this run
    According to posting cycle, you should post period 001 next
    Message no. AA683
    Diagnosis
    You cannot post depreciation in the period specified, as this will miss out a posting period.
    System response
    No posting can be made in this period.
    Procedure
    According to the posting cycle, you should post period 001 next. Either enter period 001, which corresponds to the posting cycle, or
    request an unplanned posting run explicitly for this parameter.
    If there is no Errors, How come no Documents were generated.Please advise.
    Thanks&regards
    Msreddy

    Hi,
    and have a look here: <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4f/71ea3a448011d189f00000e81ddfac/frameset.htm">Update of Depreciation</a>
    Andreas

  • Planned order is creating before planning bucket for a specific material.

    Planned order is creating before planning bucket for a specific material.
    Eg: Planning Bucket future: 12 months & Start date- 01/02/2012, but Planned order Availability/Requirement date is 12/23/2011.
    What causes this, how to fix it? Please suggest u2026
    Thanks
    Ravi

    Since your planning bucket start date is in the future, so this is normal that the system is trying to satisfy the demand in jan2012 bucket by creating a receipt on Dec23, 2011.
    Reasons for RECEIPT to be generated earlier is
    (1) There might be a FIRM HORIZON( SNP PROD HOR)
    OR
    (2) There might be a GR time and the system is considering that time
    In Customizing for Advanced Planning and Optimization -> Supply Chain Planning -> Supply Network Planning (SNP) -> Basic Settings -> Maintain Global SNP Settings, in the SNP:GR for Plnd Ords field, you have selected Processing Time.
    Blank out these times and see if it works, else do one of the following:
    (1) Set Period Factor(LOT SIZE TAB of PRODUCT MASTER) to 1, so that the receipts get created at the end of the bucket.
    OR
    (2) Create your demand at the end of the planning bucket period
    Thanks
    Kumar

  • DAC error:'No Pools were created for this ETL'

    Hi
    when I excute a plan in the DAC, it was failed, and the error message is
    'No Pools were created for this ETL. Make sure you have atleast one database connection defined for this ETL Definition.'
    so what maybe caused this problem?

    Hello Vitas,
    Looks like its been a while, I am also facing the same issue and could you let us know how you were able to resolve this ?
    DAC is up and running, all the connections are good. We were able to run Executions plans till today and facing this error all of a sudden. Below is the error message in the log file. Any help is appreciated.
    START OF ETL
    739594  INFO  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  Creating Connection Pool.
    739595  FINE  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  Inside CreateConnectionPool: got a resultset of dbconnections.
    739596  INFO  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  No Pools were created for this ETL.  Make sure you have atleast one database connection defined for this ETL Definition.
    739597  SEVERE  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  MESSAGE:::No Pools were created for this ETL.  Make sure you have atleast one database connection defined for this ETL Definition.
    EXCEPTION CLASS::: com.siebel.etl.engine.bore.NoConnectionPoolCreatedException
    com.siebel.etl.engine.core.ETL.createConnectionPool(ETL.java:1051)
    com.siebel.etl.engine.core.ETL.thisETLProcess(ETL.java:230)
    com.siebel.etl.engine.core.ETL.run(ETL.java:659)
    com.siebel.etl.engine.core.ETL.execute(ETL.java:911)
    com.siebel.etl.etlmanager.EtlExecutionManager$1.executeEtlProcess(EtlExecutionManager.java:210)
    com.siebel.etl.etlmanager.EtlExecutionManager$1.run(EtlExecutionManager.java:165)
    java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
    739598  INFO  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013 
    739599  INFO  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  The ETL took 0 Minutes
    739600  INFO  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  Returning an instance of EmailManager...
    739601  FINE  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  At the start of EmailManager.dispatch
    739602  INFO  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  EmailManager.dispatch : Created a message...
    739603  FINE  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  Starting Inside EmailManager.wrapMessage()
    739604  FINE  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  Inside EmailManager.wrapMessage(): template read and closed
    739606  INFO  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  Reducing repository pool size...
    739607  FINE  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  CONNECTION_ISSUE Repository entering restorePoolSize
    739608  FINE  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  CONNECTION_ISSUE Repository no pool size decrease required
    739609  INFO  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  Releasing connection pools...
    739610  INFO  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013  Releasing the concurrency manager...
    739611  SEVERE  Thu Oct 17 14:41:43 CDT 2013 
    END OF ETL

  • Extra plan order are created

    Hi PP expert
    I am facing  following prob.
    *Mrp type- M3*
    *stategy-30(LSF)*
    *lot sze procedure - Fixed  (1500)*
    When  cust. Req. come and we run Mrp sytem create extra plan order (3 nos.) after plannig time fence.
    So plz tell me why ?
    Nitu....

    Dear,
    The Purpose of Planning strategy 30 is, to Produce for major customers based on the sale order lot size.
    However u can plan addtional requirements using the demand management by creating PIR. System will create planned order as in net requirement planning.
    Since Becuse requirement type for indep requirements (LSF) defined for Strategy 30 at SPRO.
    If u donot want to system allow to create PIR & Planned order create new strategy by copying SG 30 & remove thy requirement type of ind requirement (LSF). and try.
    The strategy 30 is production by lot. This falls under MTS scenario only.
    But the production plan is created depending on the lot size. Whether it is PIR or CIR they are group till it becomes the required lot size and then only the planned orders are created.
    Hope clear to you.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Maintenance orders are created for FL/equipment only ?

    Hi all,
    "maintenance orders are created for FL/equipment only".
    How can i to understander this sentence, i use t-code: iw31 to create a maintenance order, and the 'Assembly' field can be entered. so how can i to create a maintenance order just for FL/equipment only ?
    Thanks and best regards,
    Ivy Lu

    Hi Praveen,
    It's not a message. i got this sentence from the following information:
    Q7: When you maintain an assembly in a piece of equipment, is it possible to get maintenance history of the assembly? Do you have to create it as a piece of equipment?
    A7: As maintenance orders are created for FL/equipment only, maintenance history can only be tracked at that level, not at assembly level.  Assemblies are mere structuring devices to have spare parts linked to an equipment in a structured manner. However, in PM orders, you can mention the assembly along with the FL/Eq. Depending on your reporting needs, an ABAPer could use the 'PM Assembly' field in PM orders.
    Best regards,
    Ivy Lu

  • MRP Run-Planned Order-PR

    Hi,
    Can anyone here brief me about the link between a MRP Run->Planned Order-->Purchase Requsition.And also the process that is followed prior to MRP Run.
    Thanks,

    hi look at this....i think this is not your exact requiremrnt...but this will helps you..
    http://academic.uofs.edu/faculty/gramborw/sap/mpe.htm

  • Can we load data for all levels in ASO?

    Hi All,
    Im creating cube in ASO
    can i load data for all levels in ASO
    we can load data for all Levels In BSO but in ASO i need confirmation????
    and one more
    wat is the consider all levels option in ASO is used for ? wat is the purpose?
    Can any one help ,it would be appriciate.
    Thanks

    In an ASO cube you can only load to level zero
    The consider all levels if used for aggregation hints. It allows you to tell the aggregation optimizer to look at all levels when deciding if aggregation needs to be done on the dimension

  • Can we load data for all levels in ASO cube

    Hi All,
    Can we load data for all levels of members in ASO cube in 9.3.1.
    Regards

    Yes you can load data for all levels in an ASO cube in any version HOWEVER, none of the upper level data in any cube will be there when you look for it. You will get a warning message in the load because ASO cubes don't store data at upper levels. It is the same as loading data into dynamic calc members in BSO cube. It will do the load without compalints, but there will be no data there (At least you get the warning in ASO)

  • Creating Planned orders and Requisitions for a particular MRP controller and for all the others only Requisition is to be created.

    Hi Experts,
    Currently we run Program 'RMMRP000' as a batch job to create Planned orders and requisitions.
    The client wants that Planned orders and Requisitions should be created for a particular MRP controller and for all the others only Requisition is to be created.
    I implemented Exit 'EXIT_SAPMM61X_001' in the following manner by passing MRP controller to user_key.
      IF mt61d-dispo <> user_key.
        no_planning = 'X'.
      ENDIF.
    But as you can see that this will not meet my client requirement.
    If any of you has worked on similar requirement / if any one knows that this is achievable or not,
    please share your inputs.

    Moved from SAP ERP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD) to ABAP Development
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • No Planning file entry created  for the Rervation

    Hi PM Gurus,
    When we create a maintenance order, for the component the Reservation is created. The components is externally procured with the some planned delivery dates. but during the MRP run these Planned Orders are not converted to PReqs automatically. checking the planning file entry there in no planning file entry created therefore MRP has not considered it.
    Now we are using MD15 to collectively convert the Planned Orders to PReqs.
    The Item category of these spare parts are "L". Please suggest if what configurations are to be checked, maintained in order for MRP generate the PReqs from the Planned Orders.
    Thanks,
    Nag

    Hi,
    MRP does not convert planned orders into purchase requisitions. MRP creates one of the procurement proposals, planned orders or purchase requisitions, according to the parameters you run it. Check out the parameters of your MRP run, you need to select create purchase requisitions and delete old procurement proposals to fulfill your requirement.
    Regards.

  • Not able to find the source requirement of MRP RUN-(planned order)

    Dear All,
    Actullay In MRP run system is generating 10000 qty in planned order but in MD61 there is only 3000 qty and no sales order requirement also exists for the same. And when i rerun the MRP by choosing option 3 in planning mode, then also it is generating the planned order for 10000 qty only but Iam not able find out the base requirement for that. Kindly suggest me the solutions.
    Regards,
    Krishna

    Dear balu
    Check assembly scrap in MRP 1 view
    and also check which lot size u r using
    is it HB - replanishment up to maximum stock level
    or FX - fixed order size
    Kindly check
    Regards
    Sachin

  • Photos are not being created for all users on MySites.

    I am currently syncing AD thumbnail photos to sharepoint 2010 SP1 Dec CU .  I have configured everything properly and after the full profile sync I can see the binary data for the thumbnail photo.  I have run the following command on
    the Sync_DB to see the binary data.
    Select sAMAccountName,SPS_MV_OctetString_PictureURL from MMS_Metaverse with(nolock) Where SAMAccountName like '%UserName%'
     I then go to run the Update-SPProfilePhotoStore -CreateThumbnailsForImportedPhotos 1 -MySiteHostLocation <mySiteHostURL>.
    Initially, this took awhile and looking at the library of the photos, a large percentage of users photos were created but there are a lot of photos missing for users in the organization.  This is actually affecting my photo so I can see that in
    the library, I do not see the three specific photos for myself BUT the binary data for the picture is in the Sync_DB. 
    The problem is that running the Update-SPProfilePhotoStore only does a portion of the photos.  I have re-ran the powershell command multiple times and still not getting additional photos created.  The DB does not have any restrictions on growth
    and there are no errors on the DB side.  

    I followed up with Brian and the fix was a multiple step process:
    He enabled the User Profile Service (From Manage Services On Server) on all Application servers, then ran a full user profile sync, and then ran the Update-SPProfileStore PowerShel cmdlet again. This added a few more photos, but still not all.
    I pointed him at this link:
    http://matthewyarlett.blogspot.com/2012/09/profile-photos-not-synchronising-from.html which gives a PowerShell command to check what each user's PictureURL property is set at. He noticed that some URL's had the mysitehosturl:80 in them and some did not.
    By using the script in the link sent he was able to remove the :80 from the URL's and then everything started working. Also, I believe he removed the %20 from some of the URL's as described in that link.
    Regards,
    Andrew J Billings
    Portal Systems Engineer//MCSA,MCSE
    Blog:
    http://www.andrewjbillings.com 
    Twitter:   LinkedIn:
      

  • Planned orders are created when Production order is open

    Hi Everyone
    We have Make order and Make to stock scenarios in the system for various products. When Production order is still open ( Fully confirmed with C015 and partially delivered), system assuming that order is completed and created a new planned order for the undelivered quantity against Sales order.
    As per my knowledge MRP shouldn't create new planned orders when old production order is still incomplete. The old production order has status REL, PDLV and CNF.
    Any help is appreciate and it is our production issue
    Regards
    Prasad

    Hi,
    is the order marked as completely delivered on the Warehouse view? Have you reached the under delivery tolerance for this order with your partial delivery from production? If yes, this would be the reason why the system thinks that a new order is required
    Regards
    Thomas

  • Purchase Order not created for a Shopping Cart

    We have a few Shopping Carts created in SRM which did not transmit as PO to our backend R/3 system. This happened because our R/3 system went down for a couple of hours and the Shopping Carts were created during this time. We tried to submit these Shopping Carts through the Application monitor later and the SRM system gave a message "Processed Successfully". However, POs for these Shopping Carts were not created and the Shopping Carts have a status of "Item in transfer process".
    The Shopping Carts have already got a PO number assigned to them through the SRM system. However these PO's have not been created in the backend R/3 system
    We are struggling to find the failed RFC calls with the help of BASIS so that we can possibly reprocess them. Alternatively we are also looking for a way to retrigger the PO creation for these Shopping Carts.
    I need ideas to resolve this issue.
    Many thanks in advance.
    Susmit

    Not sure if you received an answer or not, but this is what we have had to do in the past:
    1.  Run BBP_PD for the shopping cart to see what the purchase requisition number will be on the backend system.  The requisition number will still be provided even if it fails to transfer to the backend.
    2.  Run FM BBP_PD_SC_RESUBMIT.  The object key field will be the requisition number; the object ID field will be the shopping cart number.
    Hope this helps.
    Monique Stephens

Maybe you are looking for