Mass Additions Description

Hello
Can we maximize the description that is being transferred from AP Distribution to Fixed Asset Mass Additions? If so, how?
jann

I mean the number of characters that can be copied from AP.. I think the current number of characters allowed now for Mass Additions description is only 80.. Can we make it 150 or more?
thanks

Similar Messages

  • Undelete in Mass Additions Queue=Delete

    My business user inadvertently deleted all AP transactions from Mass Additions using Tools==>Delete All. The transactions were in queue 'New' but now are in queue 'delete'. Is there a way to put them in the 'New' queue again. No post process has happened as of yet. The trasactions were sent by AP using Mass Additions process.
    Thanks in Advance!
    mtm

    Hi,
    We could find the work around for deletion of assets which are in POST Status.
    We edited the Description of the Asset and saved it again.This way it allowed to Delete the Mass additions which got stuck with POST status.
    Thanks

  • MASS ADDITIONS POST 시 DR/CR 계정이 안 생기는경우

    제품 : FIN_FA
    작성날짜 : 2003-12-02
    MASS ADDITIONS POST 시 DR/CR 계정이 안 생기는경우
    ========================================
    PURPOSE
    Mass Additions Post 에 의해 생기는 DR/CR clearing accounts 가
    merged mass additions lines에서는 잘 안생기는 경우가 있다. 이에 대한
    해결책을 제시한다.
    Problem Description
    다음 Query문으로
    DR/CR Clearing Accounts 가 안생기는 자산을 찾을수 있다.
    select distinct th.asset_id "ID",th.book_type_code "BOOK"
    ,th.invoice_transaction_id "TRX_ID"
    ,ai.fixed_assets_cost "COST"
    ,ai.payables_code_combination_id "CC_ID"
    from fa_transaction_headers th,
    fa_asset_invoices ai,
    fa_deprn_periods dp
    where (th.transaction_type_code = 'ADJUSTMENT'
    or th.transaction_type_code = 'ADDITION')
    and dp.book_type_code = th.book_type_code
    and dp.period_close_date is not null
    and th.date_effective between
    dp.period_open_date and nvl(dp.period_close_date, sysdate)
    and th.asset_id = ai.asset_id
    and th.invoice_transaction_id = ai.invoice_transaction_id_in
    and ai.payables_code_combination_id = gcc.code_combination_id
    and (0 =
    (select sum (ai1.fixed_assets_cost)
    from fa_asset_invoices ai1
    where th.asset_id = ai1.asset_id
    and th.invoice_transaction_id = ai1.invoice_transaction_id_in
    and ai1.fixed_assets_cost != 0
    and ( ai1.merged_code = 'MC'
    or ai1.merged_code = 'MP')))
    and not exists
    ( select ad2.transaction_header_id
    from fa_adjustments ad2,
    fa_asset_invoices ai2
    where th.asset_id = ad2.asset_id
    and th.asset_id = ai2.asset_id
    and th.invoice_transaction_id = ai2.invoice_transaction_id_in
    and th.book_type_code = ad2.book_type_code
    and th.transaction_header_id = ad2.transaction_header_id
    and ( ad2.source_type_code = 'ADJUSTMENT'
    or ad2.source_type_code = 'ADDITION')
    and ad2.adjustment_type = 'COST CLEARING'
    and ad2.code_combination_id = ai2.payables_code_combination_id
    and ad2.adjustment_amount = ai2.fixed_assets_cost );
    Workaround
    한꺼번에 넘어오는 Invoice들중 먼저 하나를 Asset으로 등록하고 나머지 Invoice들을 기존 자산에 'Add to Asset' 을 이용하여 등록한다.
    Solution Description
    Apply 11i.FA.J (2230269) 이상에서 해결되었다.
    Reference Documents
    205765.1

    Hi
    Supplier invoice debit an account XXXX. This should be a CIP account (construction in progress), which is an Asset type account in GL.
    When you capitalize the project, the system is populating the mass addition 'clearing account' field with the account debited by Projects (in your case, by AP). This will be the XXXX account.
    The Expense Account should be the account you intend to charge periodic depreciation costs.
    The Asset Account should be the account you intend to charge the value (the cost) of the asset in GL balance sheet.
    Both, expense and asset, accounts are derived from the asset category.
    If you have not defined asset categories, the system will use the default accounts from the system implementation setup.
    Usually when you create an asset in Projects, before capitalizing, you are expected to setup the asset category. Asset category derives accounting and depreciation method.
    Dina

  • Fa mass additions (fa_addition_pub.do_addition)

    Hi All,
    I am working on Mass Addition interface. After successfull execution of fa_addition_pub.do_addition package.I got asset_id too..
    output :-
    S 0
    SUCCESS
    THID 167215
    ASSET_ID 109950
    ASSET_NUMBER 99339
    But my issue is i am not able to get this data in fa_mass_addition table ...In which table this data is updated ?
    How to get the data in Fa Mass Addition so that i can run 'post mass addition' to get status as posted..?
    Your knowledge will be appreciable..
    Thanks
    Raman Sharma

    FA_ADDITIONS_B table in the FA
    but will u provide the script or review mine ..
    /* Formatted on 2012/05/23 14:19 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */
    DECLARE
    -- CURSOR C1
    -- IS
    -- SELECT *
    -- FROM MCB_FA_TABLE;
    P_API_VERSION NUMBER;
    P_INIT_MSG_LIST VARCHAR2 (200);
    P_COMMIT VARCHAR2 (200);
    P_VALIDATION_LEVEL NUMBER;
    X_RETURN_STATUS VARCHAR2 (200);
    X_MSG_COUNT NUMBER;
    X_MSG_DATA VARCHAR2 (200);
    P_CALLING_FN VARCHAR2 (200);
    PX_ASSET_DIST_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_DIST_REC_TYPE;
    PX_TRANS_REC FA_API_TYPES.TRANS_REC_TYPE;
    PX_DIST_TRANS_REC FA_API_TYPES.TRANS_REC_TYPE;
    PX_ASSET_HDR_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_HDR_REC_TYPE;
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_DESC_REC_TYPE;
    PX_ASSET_TYPE_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_TYPE_REC_TYPE;
    PX_ASSET_CAT_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_CAT_REC_TYPE;
    PX_ASSET_HIERARCHY_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_HIERARCHY_REC_TYPE;
    PX_ASSET_FIN_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_FIN_REC_TYPE;
    PX_ASSET_DEPRN_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_DEPRN_REC_TYPE;
    PX_ASSET_DIST_TBL FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_DIST_TBL_TYPE;
    PX_INV_TBL FA_API_TYPES.INV_TBL_TYPE;
    LV_COUNT NUMBER := 1;
    L_MESG_COUNT VARCHAR2 (2000);
    L_MESG VARCHAR2 (2000);
    L_RETURN_STATUS VARCHAR2 (2000);
    PX_INV_RATE_TBL FA_API_TYPES.INV_RATE_TBL_TYPE;
    PX_INV_REC FA_API_TYPES.INV_REC_TYPE;
    PX_INV_TRANS_REC FA_API_TYPES.INV_TRANS_REC_TYPE;
    BEGIN
    BEGIN
    FA_SRVR_MSG.INIT_SERVER_MESSAGE;
    FND_MSG_PUB.INITIALIZE;
    END;
    P_API_VERSION := 1.0;
    P_INIT_MSG_LIST := FND_API.G_FALSE;
    P_COMMIT := FND_API.G_FALSE;
    P_VALIDATION_LEVEL := FND_API.G_VALID_LEVEL_FULL;
    X_RETURN_STATUS := L_RETURN_STATUS;
    X_MSG_COUNT := L_MESG_COUNT;
    X_MSG_DATA := L_MESG;
    P_CALLING_FN := NULL;
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC------------------------------------------------------
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.ASSET_NUMBER := 'XPRIA1100'; ---FA.ASSET_NUMBER;
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.DESCRIPTION := 'Xperia Mobile'; ---FA.DESCRIPTION;
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.ASSET_KEY_CCID := 2; ---FA.ASSET_KEY;
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.TAG_NUMBER := NULL; ---FA.TAG_NUMBER;
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.SERIAL_NUMBER := NULL; ---FA.SERIAL_NUMBER;
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.MANUFACTURER_NAME := NULL; ---FA.MANUFACTURER_NAME;
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.MODEL_NUMBER := NULL; ---FA.MODEL_NUMBER;
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.IN_USE_FLAG := 'YES'; ---FA.IN_USE_FLAG;
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.INVENTORIAL := 'YES'; ---FA.INVENTORIAL;
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.OWNED_LEASED := 'OWNED'; --FA.OWNED_LEASED;
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.NEW_USED := 'NEW'; ---FA.NEW_USED;
    PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.CURRENT_UNITS := '10'; ---FA.CURRENT_UNITS;
    PX_ASSET_CAT_REC-------------------------------------------------------
    PX_ASSET_CAT_REC.CATEGORY_ID := 21; ---FA.CATEGORY_ID;
    PX_ASSET_CAT_REC.DESC_FLEX.ATTRIBUTE1 := NULL; ---FA.ATTRIBUTE1;
    PX_ASSET_CAT_REC.DESC_FLEX.ATTRIBUTE2 := NULL; ---FA.ATTRIBUTE2;
    PX_ASSET_CAT_REC.DESC_FLEX.CONTEXT := 'COMPUTER-PC'; ---FA.CONTEXT;
    PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.COST := 2400; ---FA.COST;
    PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.ORIGINAL_COST := 2400; ---FA.ORIGINAL_COST;
    PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.SALVAGE_VALUE := NULL; ---FA.SALVAGE_VALUE;
    PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.DATE_PLACED_IN_SERVICE := SYSDATE; --- FA.DATE_PLACED_SRV;
    PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.DEPRECIATE_FLAG := NULL; ---FA.DEP_FLAG;
    PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.DEPRN_METHOD_CODE := NULL; ---FA.DEP_METHOD_CODE;
    PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.LIFE_IN_MONTHS := NULL; ---FA.LIFE_IN_MONTHS;
    PX_ASSET_DEPRN_REC.YTD_DEPRN := NULL; ---FA.YTD_DEP;
    PX_ASSET_DEPRN_REC.DEPRN_RESERVE := NULL; ---FA.DEP_RESERVE;
    PX_ASSET_HDR_REC.BOOK_TYPE_CODE := 'OPS CORP'; ---FA.BOOK_TYPE_CODE;
    PX_ASSET_DIST_REC.UNITS_ASSIGNED := NULL; ---FA.UNITS_ASSIGNED;
    PX_ASSET_DIST_REC.EXPENSE_CCID := NULL; ---FA.EXPENSE_CCID;
    PX_ASSET_DIST_REC.LOCATION_CCID := NULL; ---FA.LOCATION_CCID;
    PX_ASSET_DIST_REC.TRANSACTION_UNITS := NULL;
    --PX_ASSET_DIST_REC.UNITS_ASSIGNED;
    PX_ASSET_DIST_TBL (1) := PX_ASSET_DIST_REC;
    PX_INV_TBL (1) := PX_INV_REC;
    --l_inv_rec.source_line_id := i.source_line_id;
    PX_INV_REC.FIXED_ASSETS_COST := 2400; ---I.FIXED_ASSETS_COST;
    PX_INV_REC.PAYABLES_COST := 2400; ---I.PAYABLES_COST;
    PX_INV_REC.PAYABLES_CODE_COMBINATION_ID := NULL;
    ---I.PAYABLES_CODE_COMBINATION_ID;
    PX_INV_REC.INVOICE_NUMBER := NULL; ---I.INVOICE_NUMBER;
    PX_INV_REC.PO_NUMBER := NULL; ---I.PO_NUMBER;
    PX_INV_REC.UNREVALUED_COST := NULL; ---I.UNREVALUED_COST;
    PX_INV_REC.PROJECT_ID := NULL; ---I.PROJECT_ID;
    PX_INV_REC.TASK_ID := NULL; ---I.TASK_ID;
    PX_INV_REC.DELETED_FLAG := 'NO'; ---I.DELETED_FLAG;
    PX_INV_REC.DESCRIPTION := NULL; ---I.DESCRIPTION;
    PX_INV_REC.PO_VENDOR_ID := NULL; ---I.PO_VENDOR_ID;
    PX_INV_REC.AP_DISTRIBUTION_LINE_NUMBER := NULL;
    ---I.AP_DISTRIBUTION_LINE_NUMBER;
    PX_INV_REC.PAYABLES_UNITS := NULL; ---I.PAYABLES_UNITS;
    PX_INV_REC.INVOICE_ID := NULL; ---I.INVOICE_ID;
    PX_INV_REC.INVOICE_DATE := NULL; ---I.INVOICE_DATE;
    PX_ASSET_TYPE_REC------------------------------------------------------
    PX_ASSET_TYPE_REC.ASSET_TYPE := 'CAPITALIZED'; ---FA.ASSET_TYPE;
    PX_INV_TRANS_REC.TRANSACTION_TYPE := 2; ---TRANSACTION_TYPE_CODE;
    -- PX_DIST_TRANS_REC := NULL; Modify the code to initialize this parameter
    -- PX_ASSET_TYPE_REC := NULL; Modify the code to initialize this parameter
    -- PX_ASSET_HIERARCHY_REC := NULL; Modify the code to initialize this parameter
    -- PX_ASSET_FIN_REC := NULL; Modify the code to initialize this parameter
    -- PX_ASSET_DEPRN_REC := NULL; Modify the code to initialize this parameter
    -- PX_ASSET_DIST_TBL := NULL; Modify the code to initialize this parameter
    APPS.FA_ADDITION_PUB.DO_ADDITION (P_API_VERSION
    , P_INIT_MSG_LIST
    , P_COMMIT
    , P_VALIDATION_LEVEL
    , X_RETURN_STATUS
    , X_MSG_COUNT
    , X_MSG_DATA
    , P_CALLING_FN
    , PX_TRANS_REC
    , PX_DIST_TRANS_REC
    , PX_ASSET_HDR_REC
    , PX_ASSET_DESC_REC
    , PX_ASSET_TYPE_REC
    , PX_ASSET_CAT_REC
    , PX_ASSET_HIERARCHY_REC
    , PX_ASSET_FIN_REC
    , PX_ASSET_DEPRN_REC
    , PX_ASSET_DIST_TBL
    , PX_INV_TBL
    , PX_INV_RATE_TBL
    -- END LOOP;
    LV_COUNT := LV_COUNT + 1;
    COMMIT;
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE ( X_RETURN_STATUS
    || ' - '
    || X_MSG_COUNT
    || ' - '
    || X_MSG_DATA
    L_MESG := 'FAILED (' || SQLERRM || '): ' || L_MESG;
    END;
    it returns with a message ( E - 1 - OFA )
    which is not descriptive at all

  • Undelete Mass Additions - Queue 'delete'

    My business user inadvertently deleted all AP transactions from Mass Additions using Tools==>Delete All. The transactions were in queue 'New' but now are in queue 'delete'. Is there a way to put them in the 'New' queue again. No post process has happened as of yet. The trasactions were sent by AP using Mass Additions process.
    Thanks in Advance!
    mtm

    Hi,
    We could find the work around for deletion of assets which are in POST Status.
    We edited the Description of the Asset and saved it again.This way it allowed to Delete the Mass additions which got stuck with POST status.
    Thanks

  • Mass addition accunting entires from PO to FA

    Hi
    any one please help me to know what are all acunting entires created in mass addition process - from PO to FA
    1) I created asset item in the asset orgainsation
    2) for example the item is 'Computer laptop' - in purchasing tab - account code is - asset clearing account.
    3) I entered purchase order for 'computer laptop' - the distribution account - asset clearing accounting. it is 3 way match.
    4) I received the item - 'Computer laptop' - delivered it
    5) same PO matched against AP invoice
    6) AP invoice distribition account - showed asset clearing account - Tracked as asset is checked
    7) Ran the mass addition program
    8) in FA through the mass additioin- I add the new assest.
    In this case - what are all accounting entires created from receipt of 'computer laptop', delivery of item, matching to AP invoice and Addition of asset. - please write the down accounting entry.
    Thanks
    venkatesan
    Edited by: user11936275 on Jan 20, 2011 8:55 PM

    Hi Vekatesan,
    For Asset related invoicess , In AP
    Credit Liability
    Debit Asset Clearing
    Mass additions will create the asset with the following entries
    Debit Asset account for computer-Laptop
    Credit Asset Clearing
    Regards
    Muthu

  • Function to compare particular value with LOV Additional Description column

    Hi,
    Is there an existing function that compares a value with the "Additional Description" of a particular LOV ?
    Can the comparison be done by "Adminstration - Personalization"?

    Sorry & thanks sathish,
    Now i got the result.
    SQL> select DECISIONED_STAGE_ID,DECISIONED_STAGE_USER_ID from naap10_application where APP_DECISION_DATE BETWEEN TO_DATE ('31.01.2007 00:00:00', 'DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI:SS') AND TO_DATE ('31.01.2007 23:59:59', 'DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
    2 and application_id=2007010028552;
    DECISIONED_STAGE_ID DECISIONED_STAG
    2006060113 SYSTEM
    ================================
    But one doubt,
    When i created the column with the date datatype how it gets the time value,
    And in one environment db i got the result but in another environment i dont get,
    Shall i want to change any session status of date?

  • Loading categories to the mass additions interface

    Hi,
    We are doing an R12 FA implementation.
    If I explain it more detail.
    We have 11i , but we r going to scrap 11i and implement R12 fresh.
    However the data will be extracted from 11i as it is.
    As u all know we need to use either mass additions interface or the additions API. In this case we r going to use mass additions interface.For the conversion we r going to use ODI to map the data.
    The isssue we are facing is, since the ODI is going to be used it will map data from 11i base tables to the mass_additions_interface table in R12. The mapping of the categories becomes a major issue in this scenario. Since we cannot load the category combinations to the interface, instead only an ID can be populated.As I told you we r populating the 11i values it will be wrong the populate it with 11i values, because in R12 we will have a new set of category IDs.
    Can anyone help me to load the categories ( That exist in R12) to the mass additions interface using ODI? or is there a way using the API?
    Thanks and Regards,
    MPH

    Hi,
    I believe you need to define another table which maps the Old Category ID with New one. Use ODI to map the Data and this Temp table to Mass additions.
    Regards,
    Sridhar

  • Which table tag number is stored after running post mass additions in FA

    Hi,
    could any one tell me, in which table tag number is get stored after running the post mass additions program in FA (R12).

    Hi,
    It will be stored in fa_additions_b.
    Thanks,
    Vinod

  • Assets Mass Addition error-APP-OFA-48400

    Hi,
    We are working on Oracle Applications 11i. The Assets user have run the post mass additions and the Mass Additions post gave no output when it completes successfully (POST MASS ADDITIONS REPORT and two of the MASS ADDITIONS POST resulted in error before the thired one completes successfully) and there is still one item X in the POST queue in the mass additions.
    Item X was one of two items in the same PO and same invoice the second item Y was POSTED successfully and now has an asset number.
    I have checked the po charge accounts, ap expense account and fa clearing account and they match.
    Any clues?
    This matter is urgernt please due to the period closing.
    Found the following error in one of the logs:
    At least one of the child requests failed.
    Cause: At least one of the child requests spawned to run Mass Additions Post failed.
    Action: Check the Mass Additions Post log files to find out what caused the request to fail.
    Error: function famgpi returned failure (called from FAMAPT)
    APP-OFA-48400: Error: function famgpi returned failure (called from FAMAPT)
    Edited by: AHS on Feb 4, 2010 1:37 AM
    Edited by: AHS on Feb 4, 2010 1:48 AM

    Thank you for your help.
    unfortunately, i have no access to metalink these days.
    We had also the following error ; on the attempt to open the assignment form of the item:
    APP-OFA-48317: the employee to which this distribution line is assigned is no longer valid.
    when the form opens there is no emmploye visible in the assignment line.
    and in the table FA_MASSADD_DISTRIBUTIONS an employee_id is there.
    So, I chose an employee in the form and saved it, then I cleared the employee from the line and saved again.
    Finally the problem is solved.

  • Life in months is not populating from interface in Mass Additions Post

    Hi,
    We have one critical issue in FA conversion.We have popultaed the life_in_months in fa_mass_additions table.When we run the Mass Additions Post,it is defaulting the life_in_months from category and not from fa_mass_additions interface table.As per intended functionality,it should populate from interface table.
    If any of you encounter the issue,Please let me know the soultinon.
    Thnaks
    Praveen

    >
    DATA showing on front end,but it is not populating into base table AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL.
    >
    Are you saying you can see the distributions from front end but not in the table?
    Did you populate the distribution related columns in AP_INVOICE_LINES_INTERFACE (e.g. DIST_CODE_COMBINATION_ID)?
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • Date in service - AP to FA Mass addition

    Hi
    In R12, when we ran the AP to FA Mass addition and querying mass addition in FA, system is showing new assets with date in service as the date on which Mass addition was run. Is that the intended functionality..?
    Can we change the date in service as invoice date by default through mass addition program..?
    regards
    Ahsan

    Please check in KON* series table in SE16N transaction. I guess KOHN table may help you out. You can see other similar tables.
    In any one of the table you will find validity data.

  • While merging lines in prepare mass additions invoices lines do not appear

    Hello,
    I am facing an issue in merging mass additions line. I dont see any lines to merge even though many invoice line exist. I even tried query mode where i query the lines based on the invoice number but still lines do not appear for merge.
    detailed steps:
    Press open button on an oh hold item in the mass additions summary window.
    Enter additional information and select done.
    Back in the mass additions summary window, pick the first mass addition item again and press 'merge'
    button.
    Select the other new mass additions items that you want to merge into one asset.
    -> Problem, the other new items do not appear for selection.
    It was working fine till few months back but seems some patch have created this issue. Have you faced such issue?
    We are on 12.0.6.
    Any pointer is helpful.
    Regards
    Bipin

    I wish I had a 10.3.9 machine to check, but, since your video card should definitely be up to the task, I think it's probably going to be that Keynote's having a unique problem with your setup. In Keynote, under the Keynote menu, choose "Provide User Feedback" and send your problem to Apple. It could be that it may not have been reported yet.

  • Mass Additions Posting Report customization

    Hi,
    I am customizing a standard report that has one mandatory parameter. Requirement is to make the report available for all SOBs by removing the parameter. Report is "Mass Additions Posting Report" (FAS824.rdf). While trying to remove the P_BOOK parameter in the standard RDF, I am unable to derive values for "Accounting_Flex_Structure" variable as it is being derived using the P_BOOK value. This particular value is coming from "FA_BOOK_CONTROLS.accounting_flex_structure". I am unable to group it with the main group in the RDF which is using "FA_SYSTEM_CONTROLS". There is no link for FA_SYSTEM_CONTROLS to any table where I can join it with FA_BOOK_CONTROLS to derive "Accounting_Flex_Structure" and make the report run for all SOBs. Please help.
    Thanks in advance.
    Kiran

    I think you can use database trigger, Whenever they are running the Mass Additions posting, the trigger will submit the concurrent request (FAS824) in a loop, use Fnd_Request.submit_request by the particular SOB parameter, hope this can help you
    br,
    thanks

  • KIMYONG: Mass Addition Create 에서 Ctrl + F11 이로 Invoice조회가 되지 않을때

    Purpose
    Prepare Mass additions form,Ctrl+F11 조회시 모든 Data가 return되지 않는 경우가 있습니다.
    이에 대한 원인및 조치사항을 제공하고자 합니다.
    Solution
    원인은 아래 bug처럼 Security by book setup이 되어 있을경우 발생합니다.
    Bug 5186425 FAXMADDS: Can Query Mass Additions of all Secured Books in summary Window
    해결책으로는 아래와 같은 것들이 제시되고 있습니다.
    This issue has been fixed in the file FAXMADDS.fmb version 115.270 or higher.
    If you are on 11i.FA.P , Please apply one-off Patch 5229010.
    This patch includes FAXMADDS.fmb version 115.271.
    Reference
    Note 370480.1

Maybe you are looking for