Mass Maintenence of cost relv indicator in the bom

Hi all,
I have a huge number more than 10000 of bom components for which i have to correct / change the cost relv indicator from " " (not relevant) to "X" (100 % relevant).
I think i can do it by cs20. But how??? Shall i have to enter one by one material (component) as an reference object in the initial screen of cs20. OR through one shot I can do it??? HOW??
Regards,
MANISH

Hi
I do not think your problem will be addressed by CS20.
You may have to write small programe to carry out this.
Regards
YMREDDY

Similar Messages

Cost Relevance Indicator default in BOM

Hi All,
The cost relevance indicator is by default X in the BOM. I have defined a new cost relevevance indicator as Y. How can i default the new indicator in teh BOM
Appreciiate your support
Regards
Tehseen

Hi,
Reason of making a new costing relevance indicator.
Our management wants to add 10% extra cost in that is calculated in Quotation. Also the 10% must only be applied on paperboard items of the BOM. The same BOM is used in Quotation and Sales orders. So i have defined a new indicator Y with 110%. I have changed all paperboard items in the BOM as Y. This solution works fine in the Quotations. But when i calculate cost in Sales order, the same 110% get applied on all paperboard cost which we dont want. In sales order we want 100% cost. Both sales order and quotations have diffrerent costing variants. Further please also explain that while i run CK11N, it calculates cost only based on indicator X which is ok. I want the same cost calculation in Sales orders. We are using condition EK02 to calculate cost in Quotation & Sales Orders.
Appreciate your support
SAPXPT

Incorrect Cost in the Cost Run - Recursive Indicator in the BOM.

Dear All,
We have an issue with few materials where in the Cost run cost is incorrect.On Further analysis we got to know that this is because the recursive flags set for in the costing BOMs caused the incorrect cost.I just want to know if any one of you have encountered this type of issue and how you fixed this issue.Please let me know.
Thanks,
dbk

Hi,
Please check if the following correction notes have been installed:
- 1487255
- 1448124
- 1437988
- 1428408
Best regards,
Antje

Issue with update of BOM by Variant Config - Cost relevant indicator

Hi All VC Expert,
We are facing an issue with the update by reference characteristic of the field STPO-SANKA Cost relevancy indicator on the BOM.
We are on SAP ECC 6.0 release 700 on Oracle
Hot Package
- SAPKA70015 on ERP Cross Application componenent
- SAPKH60013 on SAP-APPL Logistics and accouting
We are using material variant
We are on the first level of configuration
Classically, we built a procedure to set X to this data base field as below :
$self.STPO_SANKA = 'X'
We assigned this procedure to the relevant items
Here is the result we have:
At the creation of the Plan Order, this is not working
At the creation of the Prod Order, this is not working
When we do a Reload PP master data, this is working very well
On CU50/VA02 when we check the trace, the procedure is executed.
Do somebody have an idea or already facing this and solve it ?
Thanks in advance for your appreciated help.

Hi Fabien. Did you solve your problem?

Production Order - Cost Relevant Indicator

Hi,
What is the importance of Cost Relevane Indicator in the
creation of a Production Order.
In the strucuture CAUFVD or AFVGD, which field corresponds to
this indicator.
Advance Thanks
Aadarsh

Hi,
I think the field is KKALKR in CAUFVD.
And following is the F1 documentation,
Short text
Indicator: Components will not be costed
Definition
Use this indicator to specify, that all material components assigned to project stock are not relevant for costing in the network.
Sri

PREREQUISITE FOR PURCHASE ORDER MASS MAINTENENCE

Dear Experts,
Please explain the prerequisite points for the purchase order Mass Maintenance.
i want to set Delivery completed indicator for the open purchase orders.
is it prerequisite for setting the deletion flag to the purchase order items.
if delivered quantity is more the PO order quantity, it is not allowing to set the deletion flag
also it issues the warning message of release PO - Release already affected.
Please explain the concept in brief.
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
When you set the "delivery completed" indicator, it considers a purchase order item to be closed. This means that no more goods receipts are expected for this item. If the "delivery completed" indicator is set, the open purchase order quantity becomes zero, even if the full quantity has not been delivered. It is still possible to post goods receipts for the remaining quantities.
When you set the "delivery completed" indicator:
The purchase order item is considered closed, even though the total quantity may not have been delivered.
Although a further delivery is not expected, it is still possible.
At the time of the next goods receipt, the system suggests the item as unselected in the item selection list.
The purchase order item can be deleted, even if the total quantity was not delivered..
Thanks and Regards,
Maheshwari

Mass update of cost element description - edit a table

Hi Folks,
i would like to know wich is the best way to update thousand of description of cost element!
this is due to the fact that i have 4 differents languages to manage....so every time it's necessary to enter them in 4 languages, but the problem was that nobody have done like this, so now i have discrepancy at description level and i want to update...quickly.
i was thinking about table editing in CSKA i know it's not the right way to procede but it's only description and i don't want to spent time in making catt....
In any case i would know wich is the command to edit a table, for my knowledge.
Thanks

Hi,
To edit a table type &sap_edit in the transaction window, while being in SE16N and entering the table. However, the right table for texts is CSKU and not CSKA.
Alternatively, you can do mass creation of cost elements 4 times while log-on in different table (OKB2 and OKB3 transactions).
Regards,
Eli

Costing Relevancy indicator cannot be set as 50%

Hello,
I have a issues with costing relevancy indicator in production order item. It doesnot consider the % such as (25% or 50%) costing relevancy. Only 100% or " " is considered.
Kindly let me know the steps to achieve the 50% costing relevancy for order component.
Best Regards
Sameer

Hi UKSAPPP ,
I have checked transaction OS18 and found that the factors are maintained. Actually i am looking for the 50% cost of component in production order planned cost. Does this come under inventory coseting as per you reply?
Because the customer wants this in production order cost for that component where this relevancy to costing is maintained as 50%.
Regards
Sameer

MASS Maintenance of cost element

Hi,
What is the TC for mass maintenace of cost element like TC :fs15 for gl
With regards,
vk

Hi krishna,
there is no mass maintaiance of the Cost element. only automatic creation of cost element.
this automatic creation is also one time job. after that only very few cost element will be created.
and also to be noted is the data under the cost element is alos very less : only thing are assigned. and there is no
that ia cost element cat, defult account assigment only.
every time u create a few G/L u can go for the automatic cost elements.
hope this is clear.
give me some points.
With Regards
Krishna Sinagreddy

Tcode for mass upload of cost allocation?

Hi all,
I would like to get a transaction code that will allow me to run a mass upload of cost allocation?
I tried ZFR_COST_ALLOC but the system didnt accept it.
Please help.
Boubacar-Issa

look https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=641178&messageID=2895219
A.

Difference in the BOM Qty during Standard Cost estimation

Hi SAP Experts,
We are trying to estimate the cost for the material variant, but the BOM exploded during the cost estimation, the quantity differs slightly with the BOM exploded during CU50.
What might be the reasons for difference.
Please give your valuable Inputs.
Thanks
Best Regards
Siva

Dear Mr.Kumar,
For any material in the material master , for Price
Control indicator in Accounting 1 View we can either
maintain S or V.
For In House Manufactured materials we maintain S
(Standard price) & for Sub contracted or bought out
items we maintain V(Moving Average price).
During cost roll up & release as far I know we cant
split like 70 & 30% and we can do the costing.
So either you have to use the moving average price for
both inhouse & bought out.
Because 1 material cant have both standard price &
Moving Average price.
Because bought out item's doesnot have standard price.
If your vendor is ready to give the material(Finished
product) using the same amount which you spend for
producing inhouse,then no issue,you can use
standard price.But Practically it doesn't occur.
I hope this will help to clear your doubt.
If useful reward points.
Regards
Mangal
Message was edited by:
Mangalraj

Mass change in Cost Center

Hello Experts
I would like to change the certain fields in cost center for group of cost centers. I planned to change through T.Code MASS. However, i am being unable to find any object type in T.Code MASS to carry the same.
Is there any option to do the MASS CHANGE in Cost center Master data with out LSMW / BDC etc.
Regards
Anil

Hi
Thanks for your reply.
I have choosen T.Code KS12 and created the new variant to bring the "Department Field CSKSZ-ABTEI" - by copying the existing screen variant through T.Code 0KM1"
Regards
Anilkumar

Cost relevancy indicator for Material

Dear PS colleagues,
Refer to the subject, when we assign a material to activity then sometimes cost relevancy indicator (on General Data tab for material) is ticked & sometimes not, can you guide me how it is controlled.It seems that it may me controlled from material master but not sure.Pl suggest...
Regards,
Ashok Sangal

Hi,
All materials which are account assigned to network/ activity, or WBS element are defaulted with cost-relevancy indicator, though this can subsequently be changed manually. This defaulting is hard-coded (as far as I know) and is dependent on the procurement type . For instance, if you attach a stock (cat:L)material component with collective requirement indicator in MRP4 to a network activity and if you opt for procurement type "Planned Indpendent requirement", you will find that 'Cost Relevancy" indicator is not defauluted. For the same material component with the setting material master settings, if you opt for procurement type "Reservation to Network", the cost relevancy indicator gets defaulted.
Obviously, text type materials etc. will not have any cost relevancy.
Hence, we can conclude that materials which are account assigned (i.e which are relevant for adding cost to proejct objects) will be defaulted with "Cost relevancy" indicator.
If you use BOM transfer functionality, you can define the cost relevancy in the "Profile for BOM transfer"
Hope the information provided is useful and relevant.
Regards
Muraleedharan.R

In the new Pages 5.0, what is the page break shortcut key. I cannot find the key as indicated on the drop down menu.

in the new Pages 5.0, what is the page break shortcut key (it used to be the Fn + enter). I cannot find the (new) key as indicated on the drop down menu. Please help.

Hi Bruce and fruhulda,
ok, I found the keyboard viewer, it only shows the traditional symbol 'return'. something like a sideway u-turn continued with the arrow under. This is the Canadian or US keyboard.
btw thanks for your suggestion.

Infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level of the document

We would like an infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level of the document. The issue seems to be joining vendor to the document cost distribution lines.
1.) BSAK + BSIK can be combined with an infoset data structure but only contain the vendor line of a document; the cost distribution lines are not in the tables.
2.) BSIS + BSAS can be combined with an infoset data structure but lack vendor data and joins (to a vendor source) are not an option with data structures. Vendor data added with an additional field is too slow to be a primary selection field.
3.) Logical data base KDF in an infoset returns only the vendor line of a document, not the cost distribution lines.
4.) Logical data base BRM in an infoset can have vendor from BSAK/BSIK attached by an additional field but performance is too slow to be useful. Joins are not an option in a logical data base infoset.
5.) Complete data is lacking when table joins between document cost distribution tables and vendor data tables are possible, (SPL actual line item table & BSIP or FMIFIHD & FMIFIIT). BSIP lacks AB documents (reversals). FM tables lack general ledger only documents.
6.) BSAK and BSIK together have complete vendor data but joins of both to a basis table are not an option. Left outer joins are too slow, inner joins won’t work since the tables have mutually exclusive data.
Does anyone know of any other options?

Hi,
This is SAP Business one reporting and printing forum. Please find correct forum and repost above discussion to get quick response.
Please close this thread here with helpful answer.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Mass Maintenence of cost relv indicator in the bom

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for