Material status in master data set not allow create production order. but..

Dear All expert.
There is one case I don't understand, the component material within BOM had been set material plant status which it is not allowed to create Production order ( Porder header Msg & PO/Network item msg = B in OMS4).
If user use tx:CO01 for create production order, the error message block production order can't be created. It is good .
However, when user is using Tx: CO41 to convert planned order to production order with that material ( status which not allowed to create production Order) . it is successfully without any error message .. User successfully create production order without limit.
Therefore, is there any configure in IMG was wrong?
thanks for reading.
Marco

Dear R.Brahmankar,
I had followed your instruction to check. It is very helpful.
when I check program in CO41 (saplcoup), I found that it only check material status (FG) on top level of BOM .
Its don't check component material.
Function CO_ZF_CHECK_MATSTAT_POS component item in BOM , the program will not check item plant status.
When I use TX: CO40 to test. I found that CO40 with Program LCOSD1J - CHECK_MATSTAT_COMP have component material status check.
I'm not sure is that genic CO41 don't have component material status check?
ths alot
Marco

Similar Messages

Goods issue document is not displaying in production order

Hi Gurus, I am having problem That when I am doing goods issue in MB1A t code the document is posting but it is not displaying in production order.but when I am doing same goods issue in MIGO the document is displaying in Production order.when I am doing same goods issue in another plant with MB1A the document is showing.so where is the problem??is there any setting with plant and T code combination??what exactly is the error??why it is not showing in particular t code in particular plant.Please guide me.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi,
Check in transaction OPL8 for the combination of plant and order type..is the below indicator are activated or not...
Thanks
Kumar

Field 'material' in service master data and material requisition

Hello, all!
Could anybody say, what is the purpose of field 'material' in service master data ('other' tab) and why system after setting the object type in that tab to 1 'material' will never show service in search help?
This first question comes from the second problem: I thought that I can make a service group, containing materials and services (like routings in PP), so system will be able to make material requisition for a case in automatical manner.
But now I'm confused. It looks like material requisition can only be made manually throught NMM7.
Is there any abilities to make requisition in automatical manner?
Thanks a lot!
Edited by: Pavel Sidorov on Feb 15, 2008 4:30 PM

Hi Pavel,
ad1) we support the creating of services based on material consumptions via service rules. Users are able to activate services rules which generate services based on the material consumption per case. But we need two entities material and services. Service rules are running automatically and no further manual work is necessary.
You will find the Service rules via IMG -> Patient Billing -> Service Rules. Service Rule R24 is the relevant service rule to generate services based on matierial consumption.
ad2) The field object type is not been used in Patient Management. It is only used by our clinical partner solution i.s.h.med. I understand that this field is confusing and not very well documented. In Patient Management we use the service master only for "services". i.s.h.med uses the field "material" and "personel" (e.g. physicians time). But it has no relevance for Patient Management.
Best regards, Robert
Edited by: Robert Mathiowetz on Feb 28, 2008 2:51 PM

Set type COMM_PR_UNIT is not allowed for product type

Hello all, I am working in SRM 7.0 and when I try to replicate service master (DNL_CUST_SRVMAS) I have this error:
Set type COMM_PR_UNIT is not allowed for product type
What can I do? I think that is an ABAP problem
Thanks in advance
Rosa Rodríguez

Rosa,
This note is something different and nothing to do with the issue. Can you share how did you resolve the DNL_CUST_SRVMAS issue? We are also getting same error.
Thanks,
Jagadish

Master Data fields not copied to posting document

Hello together,
I have the problem that some fields of the supplier master data, like terms of payment and payment method are not copied into the posting document.
For example, I am using transaction FB60 or FB01 to post a supplier invoice, but the payment method is not filled in automatically by the system although these data is available in the master data of that supplier. I debugged the program and the system is really going to the supplier master data table LFB1 and reading the information but later it is not visible.
The wired thing is that it worked before and now it stopped working just from one day to another.
I am happy for any help and ideas.
Thanks a lot in advance,
best regards, Rica

Hi Rica,
User need to enter payment method while posting doucment if you want to display payment method in line item.
Anyhow, if the payment method is available in the master record than automatic payment program will consider the payment method while gerating proposal.
Following is the F1 description for payment method in display document:-
Payment Method
Payment method with which this item is to be paid.
Use
If you enter a payment method, then only this payment method can be used in automatic payment transactions. If you do not enter a payment method, then one of the payment methods which was allowed in the master record is selected in the payment program according to specified rules.
Procedure
For document entry or document changes, you only enter a payment method if you want to switch off the automatic payment method selection of the payment program.
Regards,
Anand Raichura

Impact on transactional Loads if Master data is not loaded

Scenario for your reference:
The loads to ZPO_LINE from PC3 was failing for past 20 days from The fix was applied on April 21.
I need help to decide the effects of not loading ZPO_LINE for past 20 days. And create a detailed plan for data loads required.
If the master data is not loaded for 20 days will it affect the transaction loads happened during those days?
And how can i find out the impact and correct the transaction data if it does?
Can any 1 help me with this?

Hi,
If i understand your scenario, you have a scenario where the Master data load has not been updated for the last 20days but, the transaction data was loaded without any interruption.
In such a scenario, the Transactional loads will only be affected if there is some field which undergoes transformation after looking up on the master data.
So, first load the master data and run the attrib change run process.
After this, if the transaction data is in full update mode, then you dont need to do anything as data will be refreshed with correct values in the next load.
If delta loads are there, you might need to performa full repair.
Regards,
Rahul

In which IT To Date is not allowed & not having more than one record

Hi all,
Could you please tell me "In which IT To Date is not allowed & not having more than one record ?"
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Asiya

Hi,
Just go through IT0003 and see if it fulfills the requirements or not.
Param

Why change pointers for master data, why not change message?

Hi Gurus,
I have one doubt about Idoc.
When changes to master data has to be sent Change pointers are configured and used. (CDPOS & CDHDR). In case of the transaction data change change idoc is used as is the case with orders (we use ORDCHG for ORDERS message type to send the chnage details to a order which was already sent to other system.
Why we can't use change idoc or message type whatever, instead of Chnage pointers in case of master data or vice versa in case of transaction data.
Your valuable input will be rewarded with suitable points!!
-B S B.

Change pointers are getting stored in the tables BDCP and BDCPS. As SAP suggests these tables should be as small as possible. And Master data are not much frequently changed data.
As you compare with the transactional data, you need to change them many times in the real scenario. If we also process the transaction data via chnage pointer, these changes BDCP is getting more and more entries.
RBDCPCLR is the program used to process the change pointer. If you have much data in the BDCP table, this program will take much time to run.
So, we use the change pointers for the master data only.
Regards,
Naimesh Patel

Pocket Data: Connection not allowed!

I tried to use WLAN to connect to internet suuccessfully. When I use 3G to connect to internet, I get an error message "Pocket Data: Connection not allowed!". Can someone advise what does it mean - fault at operator side or phone settings.
Thanks!

Hi scottxe
You don't mention whether this is brand new phone with a new network provider, as the GPRS packet data server connection has to be activated; this sometimes takes 1-2 days!
Happy to have helped forum in a small way with a Support Ratio = 37.0

NiDMM call setting not allowed

Our company introduced PXI-1033 and NI40470 to improve the voltage measurement accuracy two years ago. During the normal production, after testing for several hundred thousand times(~200,000~2million), it will alarm: "niDMM call setting not allowed". each time, we need reboot the computer to fix this problem. It caused a lot of engineering work and machine downtime. Regarding to this problem, is there any solution to reduce the alarm frequency or eliminate it?

You need to supply a lot more information if you want any help.
What changed right before the errors started happening? Software just doesn't stop working after 2 years.
How are you calling the DMM? How are you handling references? What software are you using? What setting are you not allowed to make when you get this error?
Any code you can supply will help the debugging process.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

Sales order does not allow make-to-order production

Dear Friends,
I am trying to do do planned order for sales order in MD50 it was showing the error message as
"Sales order does not allow make-to-order production"
Can any one solve this
Shakthi

Hi Shakthi,
It is also possible to set the priority for Requirement Type determination like
0 Material master strategy, then item category and MRP type
1 Item Category and MRP Type
2 as 1, with check for allowed requirement type.
The transaction for this is same as "Requirement Type Determination :
Sales and Distribution --> Basic Functions --> Availability Check and Transfer of Requirements --> Transfer of Requirements --> Determination Of Requirement Types Using Transaction
Look for "Source".
In this transaction, Please, check "Requirements".
Please, make sure of the following 2 things :
1. If you do not set an indicator for maintaining the requirements class: Transfer of requirements is not carried out, irrespective of the specification you make at schedule line level for the transaction.
So it is necessary to mantain the setting first at the Requirements Class. As mentioned in my earlier posts, the requirement class for the material can be found out from Planning Strategy / MRP3 view --> Main strategy (defined in the strategy group) --> Requirement Class for Customer Requirements.
The IMG path for "Define Strategy" is Production --> Production Planning --> Demand Management --> Planned Independent Requirements --> Planning Strategy --> Define Strategy.
2. Once the "Requirements" indicator is set in Requirement Class, the requirements indicator at the Schedule Line decides whether or not you require transfer of requirments for the relevant transaction.
I hope this should solve your problem.
Regards,
Sandeep

Can i config not allow to TECO Order if order have list in COGI?

Dear any senior.
Can i config not allow to TECO Order if order have list in COGI?
i want to restrict user to can't not TECO order if have any material in COGI.
help me please.

Dear,
If there is COGI post processing error system give you the message There are still reprocessing records. Set order to technically complete?
Best practice is that first check post processing error and then go ahead for COHV.
Please refer this thread.
Re: COGI problem-Unusual
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Why the basic finish date is not adjusted in planned orders

Hi, all.
Can anybody help me to understand:
"Why the basic finish date is not adjusted in planned orders during
forward scheduling, but in production order basic finish date is adjusted?
It is look like non-coordination between groups of developers.
And lead to situation, when planner don't see in MD04 when he can really wait material receipt. He must go to planed order and check production data there, it's unusable."
Am I right, or SAP have it's own logic.

Hi,
Production orders are different story. Since production order is a constant element, they are not created in the course of MRP, basic dates can be adjusted. In production order basic finish date is adjusted, but you won't see for the upper level materials', basic dates of the planned orders adjusted according to the prodcution order you create. Production order is consistent within itself in terms of date and is not dependent to other elements of MRP, but planned orders are not like that.
MRP creates planned orders whose basic finish dates are calculated by subtracting goods receipt time from production start date of the source of requirement. MRP works backwards without changing directions. Meanwhile if any production finish date is calculated different than the basic finish date due to forward scheduling, in order not to violate the alignment between the basic finish date and source of requirement's start date, basic finish date is not adjusted. If it was, dates of all the planned orders calculated so far at the upper levels of the BOMs had to be recalculated, otherwise all the consistency of all the dates is violated. This cannot be done because changes in any level affects all lower levels.

Without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order

Our clients need is that without standard release confirmation should not allow in process order.
We are using CORK,cor6 and MB31 My need is to apply user exit in all cases.
I got input from sdn User exit:-PPCO0006 Function module Exit_SAPLCOZF_003
INCLUDE ZXCO1U06
I need to activate this only during confirmation.ie confirmation to be avoided if cost is not released.
Regards,
Pert

Hi,
You are right. For preventing confirmation in case std cost estimate release is not available you need to do enhancement. You can check for following exit along with exit which you mentioned in your post :
Enhancement CONFPI05
EXIT_SAPLCORF_405 - Process Ord. Conf.: Cust.-Specific Enhancements when Saving
INCLUDE ZXCOFU10
Check either of the enhancements which may fulfill your business requirement.
Regards,
Tejas

HR payee type selection is not allowed in production mode

Hi All,
Does anyone has clue with this error 'HR payee type selection is not allowed in production mode processing" when i'm creating third party remittance evaluation run (new) PC00_m99_URME. I'm selecting Garnishment & child support payee from drop down as i want to post my garnishment amount through 3PR.
Any response would be needful.
Thanks,
KMM

SAP runs 3rd party remittance eval for a given payroll area / pay period as a whole (i.e. regardless of payee types) when this is run in production mode (i.e. only allows this fields to have values if you run in test mode). Therefore, when run in prod mode, this selection field should not have any values.

Material status in master data set not allow create production order. but..

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for