Maximum Stage Size Possible in FP 10

Does anyone know what the max size is in FP 10 for the stage?
When I scale a swf larger than 4080 I get a black line at the
bottom below my content. Can anyone reproduce this?

It is true that the Flash IDE restricts stage size to 2880.
My question is really how large does the flash player support
scaling content?
If I have a swf that I created in the IDE at 100x100 and then
I open it in the player and tell the player to scale to 5000x5000
it appears that FP 10 doesn't complain. FP 9 and earlier did
complain by not rendering content past a certain pixel boundry.
Flex seems to have an issue if you have a gradient set on the
mx:application component (I haven't tested others yet), which is
probably the issue with the 4096 single bitmap boundary.
The crux of the matter is that I am getting artifacts on the
screen when I scale the player to a very large size that has a flex
swf loaded. The artifacts are not part of any content that I load.
So either they are caused by the flex framework components or the
flash player itself.

Similar Messages

Largest Stage Size Possible In FP 10

Does anyone know what the largest size is that the stage can
be set to? In flash player 10 I get a black line whenever I go over
4080 pixels. Has anyone else tried this or seen something
similiar?

See the following thread over in the flash forums:
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=194&threadid=1403681

Stage Size Issues in Director 11

Is there a maximum stage size in Director 11? I have set my
stage size to be 6144 X 768, in order to span 6 monitors for a
theatre project. I have used 3 monitors before, with no problem in
early versions of Director. Everything works fine while working on
the movie, but when i quit Director, I am unable to open director
again, unless I delete all the preferences and start with a single
monitor stage size.

IIRC there is a legacy bitmap dimension limitation of around
4096, so I
wouldn't be surprised if the stage also has something
similar.
You could develop separate windows (MIAW files) and display
them at
particular locations/dimensions

Public Folder To Mailbox Map Generator maximum mailbox size

Hello,
I am in the planning stages of a 2010 to 2013 public folder migration.
Upon running the following script to generate the mailbox mappings in 2013 I receive the following error regarding the maximum mailbox size requested.
[PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\scripts>.\PublicFolderToMailboxMapGenerator.ps1 5120MB E:\Migration\
PublicFolders\PFMapNameToSize.csv E:\Migration\PublicFolders\PFMapFolderToMailbox.csv
[25/11/2014 11:32:08] Reading public folder list...
[25/11/2014 11:32:08] Loading folder hierarchy...
[25/11/2014 11:32:08] The size of the folder @{FolderName=\IPM_SUBTREE\Company\Admin Team\Info; FolderSize=174
62349238} (17462349238) is greater than the mailbox size 5368709120
[25/11/2014 11:32:08] Unable to load public folders...
I want to set the maximum mailbox size to 5GB, however it seems that this is not possible given that some of the existing folders exceed the maximum mailbox size specified.
I have increased the mailbox size gradually until there are no errors reported, but this leaves me with a maximum mailbox size of 50GB which is not what I require.
There is circa 45 GB of data in the PF hierarcy currently, with the largest folder containing around 42 GB of data.
I thought the idea was that the mapping generator would split the public folder data up and distribute it across multiple mailboxes as required?
Can anyone assist with achieving this please?
Regards
Matt

Hi Belinda,
Thanks for the reply. I've done some more investigating, as I thought the public folders sizes being reported were larger than expected.
Upon running the Get-PublicFolderStatistics cmdlet across the public folder hierarchy I can indeed see that the largest public folder we have is only 4.46GB in size, not the 42GB being reported by the generator.
PublicFolderToMailboxMapGenerator
[PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\scripts>.\PublicFolderToMailboxMapGenerator.ps1 25600MB E:\Migration
\PublicFolders\PFMapNameToSize.csv E:\Migration\PublicFolders\PFMapFolderToMailbox.csv
[25/11/2014 11:40:10] Reading public folder list...
[25/11/2014 11:40:10] Loading folder hierarchy...
[25/11/2014 11:40:10] The size of the folder @{FolderName=\IPM_SUBTREE\Company\Dept\SubDept Inbox\Offers; FolderSize=45160928457} (45160928457) is greater than the mailbox size 26843545600
[25/11/2014 11:40:10] Unable to load public folders...
Get-PublicFolderStatistics
Name ItemCount TotalItemSize LastUserAccessTime LastAccessTime FolderPath Offers 4314 4.46 GB (4,788,856,098 bytes) 25/11/2014 11:41 26/11/2014 08:14 Company\Dept\SubDept Inbox\Offers
Going back a step - before running the PublicFolderToMailboxMapGenerator.ps1
, the issue is initially occurs when running the Export-PublicFolderStatistics.ps1 as this is where the folder sizes are calculated and output to the PFMapNameToSize.csv. This is where the folder size is inflated by 10 times!
Is this a bug?
Does anyone know how to change this behaviour?
Regards
Matt

Important conceptual question about Application Module, Maximum Pool Size

Hello everyone,
We have a critical question about the Application Module default settings (taking the DB connections from a DataSource)
I know that on the Web it is generally suggested that each request must end with either a commit or rollback when executing PL/SQL blocks "directly" on the DB without the framework BC/ViewObject/Entity service intervention.
Now, for some reasons, we started to develop our applications with thinking that each Web Session would reference exactly one DB session (opened by any instance taken from the AM pool) for the whole duration of the session, so that the changes made by each Web session to its DB session would never interfere with the changes made by "other" Web Sessions to "other" DB sessions .
In other words, because of that convincement we often implemented sort of "transactions" that open and close (with either commit or rollback) each DB session not in/after a single HTTP request, but during many HTTP Requests.
As a concrete example think of this scenario:
1. the user presses the "Insert" button. An HTTP request is fired. The action listener is executed and ends up with inserting rows in a table via a PL SQL block (not via the ViewObjects API).
2. no commit or rollback after the above PL/SQL block is done yet.
3. finally the user presses a "Commit" or "Rollback" button, firing the call to the appropriate AM methos.
Those three requests consist of what I called "transaction".
From the documentation it's clear that there is no guarantee that the couple AM istance + DB session is the same during all the requests.
This means that, during step 2, it's possible that another user might reference the same "pending" AM/DbSession for his needs and "steal" somehow the work done via PL/SQL after step 1. (This happens because sessions taken by the pool are always rolled back by default.)
Now my question is:
Suppose we set the "Maximum Pool Size" parameter to very a great number (always inferior to the maximum number of concurrent users):
Is there any guarantee that all the requests will be isolated in that case?
I hope the problem is clear.
Let me know if you want more details.

Thanks for the answers.
If I am right, from all your answers about resource avaiability, this means that even supposing the framework is able to always give us the same AM instance back from the AM pool (by following the session-affinity criterias), there is, however, no "connection affinity" with the connections from the DataSource. This means that the "same AM instance" might take the "a new DB connection", if necessary, from the connection pool of the DataSource. If that happens, that could give us the same problems as taking "a new AM instance" (that is, not following session-affinity) from the beginning, since each time an a new connection is taken (either via a new AM instance or via the same AM instance plus a new DB connection), the corresponding DB session is rolle back by default, clearing all the pending transactions we might have performed before with direct PL/SQL calls bypassing the AM services during the life cycle of our application, so that the new HTTP request will have a clean DB session to start to work with.

Maximum Artboard Size (Not Canvas Size)

Hi,
I read that maximum canvas size is 227in but Illustrator CC on both mac and windows and several different computer does not allow me to exceed 120in x 120 in. I can change my artboard size manually (shift+o) and drag the corners to 227inches but the number on the right upper corner is stuck on 120 inches. So what is the maximum size that I can work in Illustrator? If it is 227in why can't I make an Artboard bigger than 120 inches? And to avoid more confusion what is the canvas and what is the art board?
Thank you

mus,
When things become seriously weird, as in your case, it may be worth trying the list (you have been through 1) and 2) already, and I would suggest your skipping 3) and 5), which leaves 4) and 6).
The following is a general list of things you may try when the issue is not in a specific file, and when it is not caused by issues with opening a file from external media, see below. You may have tried/done some of them already; 1) and 2) are the easy ones for temporary strangenesses, and 3) and 4) are specifically aimed at possibly corrupt preferences); 5) is a list in itself, and 6) is the last resort.
If possible/applicable, you should save current artwork first, of course.
1) Close down Illy and open again;
2) Restart the computer (you may do that up to at least 5 times);
3) Close down Illy and press Ctrl+Alt+Shift/Cmd+Option+Shift during startup (easy but irreversible);
4) Move the folder (follow the link with that name) with Illy closed (more tedious but also more thorough and reversible), for CS3 - CC you may find the folder here:
https://helpx.adobe.com/illustrator/kb/preference-file-location-illustrator.html
5) Look through and try out the relevant among the Other options (follow the link with that name, Item 7) is a list of usual suspects among other applications that may disturb and confuse Illy, Item 15) applies to CC, CS6, and maybe CS5);
Even more seriously, you may:
6) Uninstall (ticking the box to delete the preferences), run the Cleaner Tool (if you have CS3/CS4/CS5/CS6/CC), and reinstall.
http://www.adobe.com/support/contact/cscleanertool.html

Maximum file size of 2,0 Gb exceeded

Searched all over the place and found one thread with no solutions, so I´ll try again..
I have a project with two mono recordings, each aiff and 530 mb big. Thats 2 hours and 24 minutes. When I try to bounce this in logic 8 (to mp3), I get the message "maximum file size of 2,0 Gb exceeded - please choose a shorter bounce time". ??? If anyone knows how to get around this, pleeaase let me know.
I imported the aiff files to garageband, and garageband had no trouble bouncing it to mp3, so if garageband is able to bounce it, surely logic should be!? The reason I need to bounce it from logic is because of the editing features there, so doesn´t really help that garageband is able to bounce it....also tried importing the mp3 to logic and then bounce, but same problem occured. I´ve also tried turning down the quality to lowest, but doesn´t help. Please help!

Just some thoughts on this...
If the OP is saving to a Mac formatted drive it's not a problem with creating a file on the drive. Might try saving to different location.
It's possible this may is an internal error from Logic and. It probably has little to do with the actual file size as much as it does with the overall length of time of the bounce.
In other words... if Logic sees a certain length of time for a bounce, no matter the file type, it thinks the bounced file will exceed the 2GB file limit, which is leftover programming from earlier version of Mac & PC Logic when both operating systems imposed a 2GB file size restriction.
pancenter-

Maximum file size using htmlb:fileUpload

Hello Gurus,
in a bsp application we are using htmlb:fileUpload. It was possible to upload a 43 MB file without problem. But our maximum file size is about 220 MB. We made a test with a 190 MB file. After we hit the post button, the browser disconnects immediately (without timedelay) with the message: page cannot be displayed.
for me it looks like we hit some restriction.
any idears how to manage the 220 MB file in the browser beside splitting it into smaller files would be greatly appreciated.
thx a lot in advance and regards from
Michael

Hello again,
could it be this parameter which is for the limitation responsible ?
icm/HTTP/max_request_size_KB = 102400
thx and best regards from Michael

Maximum File size in XI

I have 100 MB file to be transferred through XI.
How to check maximum file size limit in XI server.
Is thier any tcode for the same?

Hi ViJaYaNt JhA ,
File size depends on your Java Heap (Java heap depends on your Hardware Config).Basically SAP recommends a size of 5 Mb.
you can try the quicksizer tool on http://service.sap.com/quicksizer.
Also update the HTTPProvider service on the Java server dispatcher to have the parameter MaxRequestContentLength = 800M
The ABAP parameters icm/HTTP/max_request_size_km set to 2097152, icm/server_port_0 TIMEOUT set to 600. rdisp/max_wprun_time = 3600, ztta/max_memreq_MB =2048.
In SXMB_ADM add the parameter TUNING EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT = 40M
Best way would be splitting technique.
Splitting the file before it enters XI would considerably reduce the load on XI.
please refer the following links
The specified item was not found.
Refer this blog
Night Mare-Processing huge files in SAP XI
one more suggestion is:
Increase Current Value of the Parameter Nmame : rdisp/max_wprun_time
using Tcode RZ11 and try to process.
I think it is possible to process files Sizes up to 50 Mb.
Refer Note 807000 ,File Adapter: SAP Note 821267.
Regards,
Vinod.

Set maximum upload size

Hello,
We are using Portal 7.0 and the CRM Business Package (BSP's).
For a user it is possible to upload one or more attachments.
Is it possible to set a maximum upload size?
Greetings,
Gene

what version BES?
I know BPS 4.1.4 does have an issue and you would need BES Express 5 to fix it. BES Express 5 is also free.
order a copy here
http://us.blackberry.com/business/software/besx.html
Click here to Backup the data on your BlackBerry Device! It's important, and FREE!
Click "Accept as Solution" if your problem is solved. To give thanks, click thumbs up
Click to search the Knowledge Base at BTSC and click to Read The Fabulous Manuals
BESAdmin's, please make a signature with your BES environment info.
SIM Free BlackBerry Unlocking FAQ
Follow me on Twitter @knottyrope
Want to thank me? Buy my KnottyRope App here
BES 12 and BES 5.0.4 with Exchange 2010 and SQL 2012 Hyper V

Maximum HD size for MDD G4?

Hi there
I had a real pain in the proverbial when trying to do a clean install of Panther (or Tiger) on a 1Ghz G4 on a new 200 Gb HD. There were instablilities, Hands on shout down/restarts, etc, before running any updates or 3rd party apps.
Is there a maximum HD size for these Macs? It came with a 80Gb HD.
Thanks for any help...

Some RAM that worked under prior versions of OS X has been known to fail. Tiger makes much more use of all available RAM for cache is part of the reason. Memtest would give it a good workout overnight.
MDDs support Cable Select, it depends in part on the IDE cable itself. In fact, you could use it on older Macs and controllers most of the time.
Never apply an update without first doing a backup and some disk repair and maintenance. Even flushing the cache folders with something like Applejack. Never use your Mac while an update is taking place. Reboot prior to applying an update, might want to use Safe Boot Mode. And use the standalone updates, and the combo update if possible. On some occasions it was necessary to reapply the combo update.
With Tiger, I found that while it was possible to update, a full erase and install resulted in a better OS. So backup.
If you keep your home directory or backup on another drive, so much the easier and better.

Maximum message size for internal users

Hi,
Is it possible to configure a maximum message size for internal users and also create exceptions?
The templates available in Transport Rules only allow for "when size of any attachment is greater or equal". This is not ideal as users can add 50 X 1MB attachaments to an email etc.
Configuring Transport settings or Receive Connectors do not allow for exceptions.
Thank you.

Hi Prakash,
Thanks for the link to the thread. The AD site link configuration is valid but does not account for the required exceptions. E.g User A can send unlimited size message to User B but not to User C.
The thread also mentions the Transport Rule configuration stated in my original post but that configuration has one major flaw. Users can circumvent the control by splitting attachments.

By default AIX limits maximum file size to 1GB

When writing files larger than 1GB in AIX, I receive a "File too large" error.
This file size limit presents a problem, especially when creating large files,
such as LDIF exports from a Directory Server istance or message store dumps
from a Messaging Server instance.

By default, AIX limits the maximum size of files to 1GB. However, root can
adjust the maximum file size for itself with the following command: 

$ulimit -f arbitrary_large_number
 

The -f modifier
specifies the maximum file size. For example, 

$ulimit -f 4194304

This values for the maximum size of files is set in the
/etc/security/limits
file. The default values in this file are as follows: 

fsize = 2097151 
core = 2097151 
cpu = -1 
data = 262144 
rss = 65536 
stack = 65536 
nofiles = 2000 

To view your local default values, use the following command: 

$ulimit -a

Any user can adjust the maximum file size limit downward. For example, 

$ulimit -f 
2097151 
$ulimit -f 100 
$ulimit -f 
100 
$cp /unix /tmp/MyBigFile #(copy a big file to another location with enough space) 
File too large 
$ls -al /tmp/MyBigFile 
-rwxr--r-- 1 UserID GroupID 51200 Jul 25 08:41 MyBigFile
$

However, only root can adjust the ulimit
file size limits upward. Such changes
will take effect only after the user logs in again.

Additionally, it is possible to set specific user limits with the
chuser command. For
information on chuser,
click the following URL: 

http://www.rs6000.ibm.com/doc_link/en_US/a_doc_lib/cmds/aixcmds1/chuser.htm#A067913d9

For more information on the ulimit
command, check the following URL: 

http://www.rs6000.ibm.com/doc_link/en_US/a_doc_lib/cmds/aixcmds5/ulimit.htm
Note: 
The shell in use may affect the actual limits imposed by ulimit
. In particular,
/usr/csh may not
properly adjust the limit from the default value. Also,
bash (Bourne Again shell)
may treat file sizes in blocks as though they were file sizes in kilobytes(KB).

The size you can handle is not limited... only by your code :-)
Check MemoryMappedFiles... i handle Gigabyte files with no problem ;-)

What is the maximum HDD size for Pavilion DV7-3105ea and can I add a 2nd HDD.

Hi,
Please could someone advise me as to the maximum HDD size that can be installed in a Pavilion DV7-3105ea.
Additionally is it possible to add a second HDD.
Thanks and kind regards,
jB

There is no theoretical limit the only limit is what is sold on the market. Any correctly sized SATA laptop drive will work. They do now make 1TB drives that will fit and yes there is a secondary hard drive bay so theoretically you could have 2TB of storage. You are going to need 1 or 2 drives like this:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822152291
The drive has to be 9.5 mm in height some 1TB laptop drives are too thick.
You also likely need a second hard drive caddy/connector like this:
http://www.newmodeus.com/shop/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=222&zenid=2a83d0d222d80c6...
And here is a link to the Manual showing how to get to the hard drive bay:
Drive Manual
Check your system to see if a secondary drive caddy/connector is there but it likely is not and you need the part linked above. Good luck.

Maximum model size of 32k reached

Hi
I've reached the maximum model size of 32k.
The problem is that the dashboard I'm creating is still only a fifth of what the final solution will be.
So now I'm trying to think of ways to split the model into five models. And hopefully still maintain communication between the models.
Anyone have any ideas?
My thoughts this far is to have a "main" model that implements four other models through the "HTML view".
The best solution would be to implement the other models as external IViews but I don't know if it's possible.
BR
//Robin

Hi Michael
I think I'm not explaining my problem properly
I have created my model in the way that you described it. But it's just One model. And it's growing too big. Compilation is taking too much time and I sometimes get the 32k error message.
What I would like to do is to split the model into several models. Ex: 1 model with navigation and 1 model for each view. But I dont know how to do this.
I know that I could have 2 models in separate IViews in a portal page that could communicate through events. But I don't know how to put 2 IViews on top of each other and toggle between them.
What I hope will be implemented in VC is the ability to create an IView that links directly to another precompiled model.
BR
/Robin

Maximum Stage Size Possible in FP 10

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for