Message: Port 'Serial0/0/0:9-Bearer Channel' is down on device

Hi guys ;
I got this message on my Cisco Prime from a remote 2911 router, the office is running fine, phone system is working. I got alerts like every 15 min the goes down and up.The message is via email.
Message: Port 'Serial0/0/0:9-Bearer Channel' is down on device
any toughts thanks

Hi Juan,
I also face the same issue on my switch port. What TAC Engineer advice me is to :
1- configure "no snmp trap link-status" on the interface
2- re-sync the device.
Regards,
Syafiq

Similar Messages

T1 Bearer Channels Admin Down

I have 24 T1's on a 3945 gateway running IOS 15.2(1)T2, the first 6 T1's bearer channels show as down down, and D-channel for each T1 is showing up up (spoofing). The other 18 T1's bearer channels are showing Admin down down, and D-channel for each of these T1's is showing up up (spoofing). This abnormality is causing problems with our monintoring system but not with the processing of calls.
Any idea as to what would cause the bearer channels to set to Admin down?
Using the following T1 cards:
VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1
NM-HDV2-2T1/E1

You posted this in a specific Contact Center section of the forum. Please repost your question in the IP Telephony section, where you will be best served.
IP Telephony Section
https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/collaboration-voice-video/ip-telephony?view=discussions
Anthony Holloway
Please use the star ratings to help drive great content to the top of searches.

Customs alerts when a port-channel is down.

Hi,
I want to receive syslog alerts when a port-channel is down, or when a interface from the port-channel is down or if is possible to know when a neighbors is unreacheable or lost.
Is possible?? I have tried to configure Automated Actions in the tool syslogs on RME (LMS 3.2) when a interface is down (LINK-*-3-UPDOWN:* LINK-*-5-CHANGED:* LINK-*-5-UPDOWN:*), but I received alerts messages from others interfaces when only I want the interfaces that form the port-channels.
Thanks,

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Well if it's the only remaining channel link, the port-channel goes down. If not the only remaining channel link, the port-channel continues without it. As you note, you lose bandwidth and I believe traffic will be rehashed across the remaining channel links, which can result in less optimal load distribution.
Protocols like STP or a routing protocol shouldn't see a link outage or flap.

I use only two channels, have plenty of memory in my hard disk, and external hard drive, no effects, and still having problems with Garage band. Giving messages as you have too many live channels

I'm frustrated, I am doing everything you recommend, I use only two channels, have plenty of memory in my hard disk, and external hard drive, no effects, and still having problems with Garage band. Giving messages as you ave too many live channels, the disk is slow prepare...can you help?

Quote from: Richard on 15-November-07, 20:33:05
tornado2003,
What you need to do is boot into Safe Mode. Then delete the VGA Drivers.
After that boot normally and install the latest nVidia ForceWare Drivers
Take Care,
Richard
i guess you missed that:
Quote from: tornado2003 on 15-November-07, 17:26:52
ive tryed booting xp in safe mode but it just freezes after it loads up a couple of needed files .
ive even formatted my hard drive and tryed installing a fresh xp on it but it just keeps locking up when it gets to the "starting windows setup" .(this is just after it loads all the drivers from the xp cd)

The message is not reaching the outgoing communication channel

hi forum help..............
i have a IDOC-XI--JDBC scenario...
my xi receives an idoc from a sap ecc.....does a simple mapping to a jdbc structuuure and then writes to a databse....
it was working fine..... but now i had to change the JDBC adapter configuration..means in the integration builder(configuration).. i changed the name of my database server.....
now after making that change ....... the message is not reaching the outgoing communication channel....
i cant see any error in the sxmb_moni....
but there is no log for the message processing in the communication channel in the RWB............

hi,
Is the Database is running on the same server and the same tables and all are existed with same structure.
Database name is changed then you would have to check all . and after changes , did you activated ?
If every thing is correct, then refresh Cache.
For cache related see the below links
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/02/sxicache--ripped-off - SXI_CACHE - Ripped Off
XI Runtime cache error: Cache contents are obsolete
Cache Refresh - SAI_CACHE_REFRESH
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/11/03/cache-refresh-errors--new-phenomena
Regards
Chilla

I bought a new iPhone 6 and switched carriers and am trying to get my voicemail and instant messages ported over to the new phone

I bought a new iPhone 6 and switched carriers and am trying to get my voicemail and instant messages ported over to the new phone

Restore from your backup. For voicemail contact your cell phone provider.

Where to find message port for ecc 6.0 ?

Hi experts
I am creating a tecnical system(ECC WEBAS) in pi. there we have option called message Port.
so my quesiton is how to find the message port for this ?

Hi Praveen
Normally 36xx is the message port for ECC6.0 where xx is the instance numr of sap system.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4e515a43-0e01-0010-2da1-9bcc452c280b

How to check Java engine message port

i need to configure nwds for that i need J2EE message port number
i tried with 36<nr> which is not working plese guide me.

go to http://<host>:<port>/index.html.
Click on system information
Enter Administrator Login ID & PW
On top left corner u will find message port number.
Do reward points if it helps.

[svn] 1743: In the process of changing the messaging authentication tests to run over individual channels .

Revision: 1743
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-05-15 12:26:11 -0700 (Thu, 15 May 2008)
Log Message:
In the process of changing the messaging authentication tests to run over individual channels. Before the tests were just running over the first/default channel in the destination. Now the tests will be hardcoded to run over a particular channel. In this checkin I am removing the existing authentication tests and checking in tests that run over a polling amf channel. Tests for other channels are coming soon.
Modified Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/flex/messaging-config.mods.xml
Added Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/JMSAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/JMSAuthProSendTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/JMSAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthProSendTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthenticationTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MessagingAuthenticationTest2.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/polling-amf/MultiTopicMessagingAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
Removed Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/JMSAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/JMSAuthProSendTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/JMSAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/JMSAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest_Streaming.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthProSendTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthSendSubscribeConstraintTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthenticationTest.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MessagingAuthenticationTest2.mxml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/securi ty/MultiTopicMessagingAuthConSubscribeTest.mxml

Remember that Arch Arm is a different distribution, but we try to bend the rules and provide limited support for them. This may or may not be unique to Arch Arm, so you might try asking on their forums as well.

JMS event generator accepts messages, but won't push out to channels

I am monitoring the JMS event generator through the WLIconsole, and I can see the
messages coming in. I have a channel rule defined for this particular event generator
- it just allows everything through (by leaving the name and value fields blank).
I can see that there is a channel listed under the channel count.
However, when I go under the Message Broker window, and check the channel, there
are zero subscribers. This is probably why the messages that are going into
the generator aren't being recieved by anyone.
I'm trying to use this channel to kick off a workflow - so the event choice start
node is set to listen to a channel, but I don't think it actually subscribes to
the channel - if it did, why wouldn't it be listed under the WLI console as a
subscriber? How do I get the start node to listen to the channel? How do I get
the messages from the event generator into the channel?

Hello MS, Question: Do any of the LED lights on the keyboard turn on when the computer doesn’t boot? Here’s an HP troubleshooting document for notebooks that won’t start, along with some info about LED error codes: http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?cc=us&lc=en&docname=c01732674 If that doesn’t help, it is probably a hardware issue. Since you've only had the notebook for 10 months it’s probably still under warranty. You can contact HP: http://www8.hp.com/us/en/contact-hp/ww-contact-us.html Please let me know if any of these suggestions helped. If not, I will try to investigate further. TobindoHP Representative

Messages are in to be delivered state and slows down the message processing

Hello,
Messages are in to be delivered state and slows down the message processing.
this happenens in case of DB2 on some machine where the issue about high load on DB2 is caused by standard programming in SAP XI that executes a statement, where it uses the condition 'where 1<0' prio to the original SQL statement configured in the channel configuration,
Can you please help me out in solving this issue?
Thanks,
Soorya

Status: TO_BE_DELIVERED
Which means that the message was successfully delivered from Integration Server point of view and it states that the messages is initially handed over to the Messaging System.
TO_BE_DELIVERED occurs while the message is put into the Messaging System receive queue.
Solution:
This is done via the Messaging System receive servlet:
http://<Host>:<PORT>/MessagingSystem/receive/<CONNECTION>
/<PROTOCOL>
Only if this was executed successfully the Messaging System returns HTTP 200 to the Integration Server and the Status TO_BE_DELIVERED moves to DELIVERING
1. Try logging into Sap GUI with two users: XIAPPLUSER & XIAFUSER
to see if they are blocked
2. We can check the messages:
AdapterFramework
com.sap.aii.adapterframework.serviceuser.language
com.sap.aii.adapterframework.serviceuser.name = XIAFUSER
com.sap.aii.adapterframework.serviceuser.pwd
ApplicationSystem
com.sap.aii.applicationsystem.serviceuser.language
com.sap.aii.applicationsystem.serviceuser.name = XIAPPLUSER
com.sap.aii.applicationsystem.serviceuser.pwd
in the exchange profile to make sure the right passwords

My iPod Classic is not detected by my Windows 8 computer when I connect it via USB port. How can I get windows to detect this device?

My iPod Classic is not detected by my Windows 8 computer when I connect it via USB port. How can I get windows to detect this device? A message from windows says: the device has malfunctioned.

Try TS1363: iPod: Appears in Windows but not in iTunes.
See also Corrupt iPod classic.
tt2

Sender Communication Channel going down

Hi Experts,
We are on XI 7.0 with patch level SP12. We are having one problem. when we are starting the Sender JDBC communicaton channel it is working fine for the first time. but the moment there is any change in the sender or Receiver RFC communication channel. may be due to wrong system ID etc. the Sender JDBC channel goes down. Actually it shows it is running but it does not poll / pick up any records.
pl. note that subsequent changes which we had done to either to Sender JDBC channel or Receiver RFC has been rectified & re-deployed.
This problem get solved if we create a New Sender JDBC Channel.(But i guess that should not be the soluation)
I have used the following Modules in Sender JDBC channel.
AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean
localejbs/CallSapAdapter
AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean
Pl. Help.....
Regards,
Umesh

Does it go down even if a message is processed succefully or just if there is some error with the configuration?

Cisco Prime: Event Larm Port 'x' is down on device.

Hi,
I'm writing regarding; event-larms; that is reporting from Cisco Prime; connected to controller. Interfaces is reporting via event-larm; that they are down.
"Virtual Domain: ROOT-DOMAIN
PI has detected a change in one or more alarms of category Controller and severity Critical in Virtual Domain ROOT-DOMAIN.
The new severity of the following items is Clear:
1. Message: Port '3' is down on device '10.1.1.2'.
(6 times)
2. Message: Port '4' is down on device '10.1.1.2'.
(6 times)
3. Message: Port '5' is down on device '10.1.1.2'.
(6 times)
4. Message: Port '6' is down on device '10.1.1.2'.
(6 times)
5. Message: Port '7' is down on device '10.1.1.2'.
(6 times)
6. Message: Port '8' is down on device '10.1.1.2'.
(6 times)
E-mail will be suppressed up to 30 minutes for these changes."
Is there a solution how to not recieve those event-larms? The only LACP interfaces that is configured is 1 & 2, in a group.
See attached screenshot, when trying to disable the other interfaces.
The LACP is enabled and configured on "management" interface.
Best Regards,
David

From: https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12077376/prime-infrastructure-alarm-port-down#comment-9405836
"As far as I understand the error message you only need to disable SSO before you can disable the LAG ports."
"(Cisco Controller) >config port adminmode 3 disable
Blocked: Lag is enabled. Disabling the lag port is blocked when system is in redundancy state (SSO)"
"I would suggest to do this only in a maintenance window."

I have an older iMAC that once burned CD's with no issues. Now I get an error message saying "The attempt to burn a disc failed. The device is not accessible, probably because it was removed". I have never had it touched so the device was not removed.Help

I have an olde iMac that once I have an older iMAC that once burned CD's with no issues. Now I get an error message saying "The attempt to burn a disc failed. The device is not accessible, probably because it was removed". I have never had it touched so the device was not removed. Please advise as to what could be the problem. How to fix. Thanks

Try resetting the SMC and PRAM first, if that doesn't help try a cleaning disc.....and then buy an inexpensive external burner. Slimline super drive failures are all too common.
To reset the SMC
Shut down the computer.
Unplug the computer's power cord.
Wait fifteen seconds.
Attach the computer's power cord.
Wait five seconds, then press the power button to turn on the computer.
Resetting NVRAM / PRAM
Shut down your Mac.
Locate the following keys on the keyboard: Command (⌘), Option, P, and R. You will need to hold these keys down simultaneously in step 4.
Turn on the computer.
Press and hold the Command-Option-P-R keys before the gray screen appears.
Hold the keys down until the computer restarts and you hear the startup sound for the second time.
Release the keys.

Message: Port 'Serial0/0/0:9-Bearer Channel' is down on device

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for