MFBF- Costing Issue
Dear Friends,
I have one issue reg. costing in MFBF.When do yield / scrap posting in MFBF , in post with correction screen we remove some of the components which are not consumed especially in case of scrap posting of assembly but system will consider assembly cost i.e. cost of header material as per std cost estimate only considering all components.Is there any way by which we can get the actual cost as per component consumption in MFBF?
Awaiting your valuable inputs in this matter.
Thanks & Regards,
Tejas
Dear Tejas,
This is not possible.
First let me clear one thing from your side,you are saying 10 components are required for making a
product.
Does it mean 10 quantity of a component or 10 different components?
IF its going to be 10 different component's means,then there is no meaning in taking the costing run.
This is because you are not certain about how the product is going to be produced,sometime it may
happen by consuming all the 10 components and sometime it may be consuming 8 out of the 10
different components.
now case1 I hope you are suing standard cost estimate for backflushing the datas,so the system
considers the std cost of the product while backflushing.
Still your query is not clear.
Please clarify my above doubts.
Regards
Mangalraj.S
Similar Messages
-
Special MTO Scenario - Costing Issues
Hi,
Not sure if I should post it here or in the FI / CO forum, but here it is ...
I'm in the process of implementing APO in a Aerospace company in Montréal, Canada and we're stuck on an Account Assignment Planning, and Product Costing issue.
Today, all demand / production / movements / costing is done by creating a Project Network.
Here are the current settings:
- Create a project with activities for each major "line section" for major components.
- Each activity has a component allocated to it
- Each activity has a different WBS element assigned to it.
- All production orders/purchase orders/goods movements are created/posted against the WBS elements.
- All stock for MTO parts are assigned to the WBS element
In order to provide better integration with APO and bring more flexibility in the Planning and Simulation processes, we were hoping to stop using Project Networks as the trigger for demand / planning / execution. The idea was to use Sales Orders (or Customer Independent Requirements - CIR) to generate the demand and run APO and MRP planning from it. The special stock segment now becomes linked to the sales order (or CIR) which changes alot of thing in the accounting documents and costs elements in the whole planning and execution processes.
Here is what we were hoping to achieve in order to limit impacts on finance :
- we are implementing APO and would like planning to be performed without using project networks.
- we would like to have planned orders for the top level for long term and be able to trigger the purchasing of long lead time items.
- we would like all goods movements (PO reception, GI to production order etc, ) to be posted to WBS elements
- we would like all production orders to settle to WBS elements
We tried different scenarios with different account assignments categories, but could not find one that fits the bill :
1) we tried using account assignment category "D" which allows assignment to sales order and WBS element. We created CIR as demand.
The problem is the stock is non-valuated which resulted in having no accounting documents for goods issue to production order.
2) we tried account assignment category "Q" with using CIR as demand. We had one WBS element assignment in the CIR. When we changed the WBS value in planned orders to represent each "line section" we ended up with duplicate demand in the original segment and the new segment.
So, is there a scenario with valuated stock that would allow us to do a make-to-order process that would post all costs to WBS?
Thanks,
MarcHi, sorry for the title confusion ... I cannot change it anymore.
I'm not sure I understand what you are proposing.
In our case, the problem is not really linked to the CIFing to APO but more on the Account Assignment Category in ECC and the Customer / Project Stock Segment in MRP.
Since we have a multiple level BOM and that the intermediate levels need to be associate with different WBS element according to major parts of the aircraft.
Here is an example :
Aicraft -- Has its own BOM with major parts as sub assemblies,
Major Parts -- Each Major Parts needs to be linked to a different WBS for costing purpose.
Minor Sub Assemblies -- All cost of producing the Minor Sub Assemblies should be tracked inside the Major Parts WBS.
Components -- All components costs and accounting documents should be tracked inside the Major Parts WBS.
We know that by using a project Network for the Aircraft Level we could create activities for each Major Parts with different WBS, but since we want to do planning in APO, we were hoping to not use PS has a scheduling basis. The integration of PS in APO is still not used a lot and the flexibility of Projects in planning processes is not great.
In resume, we are trying to create the demand from a Sales Order or CIR, but manage costs and accounting documents within WBS for all level in order to limit impacts on the Finance Department. -
Activity cost impact on Target Cost issue
Dear All,
Earlier this issue was posted in PP forum but didnt get the answer
Kindly follow the link.
[Activity cost impact on Target Cost issue;
Regards,
ShayamDear Shyam,
Normally the Total costs in activity price calculation (KP26) are taken and multiplied with quantity and charged off to the receivers irrespective of the type of costs i.e. whether it is a Fixed cost or variable cost. We don't have functionality to consider the Fixed costs to spread across the output and take the per unit value accordingly. The Fixed costs in kp26 are updated just to reflect the costs in the cost component structure as Fixed costs.
Kind Regards
Umapathi G -
Hi All,
I need help with the production issue.There are 2 sales orders which have cost recognized in one of the month
but they are not posting to WIP.Can anyone explain me the reason for this problem.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Reema Sen on Jun 10, 2009 2:19 AMHi,
You will have to enable project manufacturing if you want to collect manufacturing cost on a project. Once you create a project, add this project to a project manufacturing organization through a PJM responsibility. Once you associate project and PJM org you will be able to put the PJM organization in the sales order line created on a Project sales order in Oracle OM. Also, mention the project number in that sales order.
Once this sales order is shipped, run the cost collection program and it will bring in the manufacturing costs to project.
Hope it helps
Regards
Kaushal -
Costing Issue-Previous Price changes in Accounting 1 tab in Material Master
Hi SAP Experts,
Our Client has an issue with "previous price" field under the "Accounting 1" tab in Mateial master .The issue is that client never did costing to this material XXXXXXwith plant XXXX. But system is showing value in the "previous price" field. We have checked whether previious cost estimate exists. There was no previous cost estimate and still the system updated "previous price" field.
Can anyone let me know in which cases the system updates "Previous Price" field in Material Master ?
Your help is highly appreciated.
Kind Regards,
K.S.KHi
May be this material was created with reference to the same material in other plant or with ref to some other material or may be costing run was deleted from CKR1
br, Ajay M -
Freight Cost issue at Order Management
Dear All,
I have Booked a sales order and done pick release process. Now, I would like to attach freight cost before shipping process. Gone to Shipping transaction form, queried my order number then gone to Actions>Assign Freight Cost>Go and assigned predefined freight cost for 1000USD. But it was not reflected in AR Invoice.
What may be the cause of this issue.Hi Al,
Issue has been resolved. We can use Group condition for this requirement.
Thanks to all, Lakshmikanth -
Dear All,
Please give me the solutions for below
u2022 We are having 2 co.codes (A=Biscuit,B=Bread), u2018Au2019 is manufacturing biscuits.
u2022 u2018Bu2019 manufactures bread, but here the issue is, such manufactured bread relates to u2018Au2019
u2022 u2018Au2019 issues material to u2018Bu2019, including fuel.
u2022 Remaining expenditure bear by u2018Bu2019(Production Happens in u2018Bu2019)
u2022 For such manufacturing u2018Bu2019 receives job work charges from u2018Au2019
u2022 Now the issue is how can we give profitability(profit and loss) of u2018Au2019 Bread(manufacturing in u2018Bu2019)How will be arrive the exact manufacturing cost of bread at u2018Bu2019
u2022 Coming to Co.code u2018Bu2019 How can we calculate Activity Cost(Manufacturing Bread)
u2022 Whether we can do production implementation in u2018Bu2019 co.code without material(Other than Bread Nothing this Co.code will do u2018Bu2019)
u2022 B.O.M is preparing in u2018Au2019 co.code,
u2022 How can we map this scenario:Co.code u2018Au2019 want to see cost of such Bread
u2022 How ca we map this scenario: Co.Code u2019Bu2019 want to see the cost of activites (machine cost, labour cost,setup cost)(remain that material from u2018Au2019 co.code including fuel and u2018Bu2019 manufactured bread)
u2022 Atlast u2018Au2019=Biscuit Division wants Finished Good of Bread Cost(Which is manufactured in u2018Bu2019)
u2022 u2018Bu2019=Bread Division Wants of Bread Manufacturing Cost(without raw material and fuel supplied by u2018Au2019=Biscuit Division) (Which is Manufactured in u2018Bu2019).
Another Issue:
u2022 While extending material from plant to depot(depot is also a plant)
u2022 Error message is u201CDO want to change the profit center, but in material stock still existsu201D
u2022 Plant (phillaur) and Depot(ahmadabad),Phillaur having one profit center,ahamdabad is having another profit center.
u2022 Here it should allow the material(plant-phillaur) to extend (depot-ahmadabad).
Another Issue:
u2022 In Vendor Line item Display FBL1N(Profit Center updation is not showing)
u2022 In Customer Line item Display FBl5N(Profit Center Updation is not Showing)
u2022 But in General Expenditure Fd10n(Profit Center is updating)Hi,
The Co codes A & B can transfer the material using the inter comany transfer scenario which will rasie bill to the supply company & do the production further process in company B.
If the BOM is in the Company A then if the production is in B then you can transfer the price to other company using the functionality Transfer Pricing control.
Bu2019 receives job work charges from u2018Au2019 this case you create the A & B as vendor as raise the service PR for the job done by A to B & once raise the Bill do the SES for accept bill then invoice to A.
The pricing control can be determined seperately for both CC A & B.you can get the COGM for both the plant seperately.you define same material code for this & extend to two company code.
See when extending the material you can change the profitcenter for the extended plant,for ex Plant having X profit center & Depot can have Y profit center.
while creating the material master newly you have to maintain this data,if there is any stock exists you cant change the profitcenter,you have to make the stock to zero then change the data.then updtae the stock.
see you can maintain profit center seperately for two different plant it is plant dependent data only thing is no stock should not there.
It will show the line item posted to the vendor & customer in the FBL1N & FBL5N.select the layout from the transaction it will show all option of profitcenter,costcenter,purchasing document everything,select & check.
Regards,
Raj.
u2022 In Vendor Line item Display FBL1N(Profit Center updation is not showing)
u2022 In Customer Line item Display FBl5N(Profit Center Updation is not Showing)
u2022 But in General Expenditure Fd10n(Profit Center is updating) -
Image link (the image above looks distorted in the post preview): http://fodder.s3.amazonaws.com/ospf-cost-diagram.jpg
In the test network shown in the diagram I have the following issue that I can't seem to figure out:
Without any modification to ospf interface cost traffic from R8 to 172.16.88.1 (R5) takes R3 --> R2 --> R5 (total metric 67).
This is not ideal because of the f1/0 interface on R2. The path via R3 --> R4 --> R6 --> R5 (total metric 68) is actually preferable but is not selected because of OSPF's baseline inability to distinguish between FastEthernet and greater link speeds.
I am fully aware that I can use the auto reference-bandwidth command on all the routers to fix things but I am testing behaviors of the ip ospf cost command at the moment.
Setting the ospf cost of the f1/0 interface on R2 to 10 changes the path for traffic coming from R8 on its way to 172.16.88.1 (R5). This is desired result. However, the return traffic from R5 continues to use the path through R2 (R2 --> R3 --> R8). This is what is illustrated in the dotted arrows in the included image. R2's interface cost is not being taken into account by R5, which I am assuming is because R5 respects his own interface cost on the link over R2's cost. However, this is producing a sub-optimal return path.
My question is this: Aside from using a route map is there an ospf configuration that I am overlooking that will cause R5 to stop thinking that the path through R2 is preferred?Hi Colin,
The only way I could solve this was to change the cost on the return path of R5 to R8. It isn't tidy, but setting the ip ospf cost on R2's G0/0 port to 10, changes the cumulative path from R5 to R8.
I changed the reference bandwidth to 1000 in the topology to see how this would changes things. I just learnt that a 'no ip ospf cost' on both int g0/0 and f1/0 on R2, does not change the cost by itself, so had to clear the ospf process in order to affect the cost. Not sure if this is normal behaviour...
With no ip ospf cost configured on R2, and the ref bw changed to 1000, the path from R8 to R5 now takes the optimal path. However traffic R5 to R8 will still take the path through R2. Checking on the cost of G0/0 on R5 the cost is 1.
Great scenario... to get the optimal return path,R5 through R6 to R8, R2's G0/0 port needed manual adjusting to 10, so R5 would not have R2 as the best path to reach R8.
Taking R2 off the shared link of R5 and R6 and having it's own Fastethernet connection to R5 would be the simplest solution? Thanks for sharing Colin.
Cheers, Jeremy. -
Production order costing issue in MTO with variant configuration
We have an urgent issue to be resolved in production order costing in MTO scenario.
We have two level configuration with configuration passed from parent to children. The parent has many configurable materials as child(semi finished BOM items) and BOM items of these child has again different raw materials(3 level BOM with last level being all raw materials) . The production order for parent created with reference to sales order.
While costing production order of parent, total planned price is displayed as zero as we have maintained price control std price for all configurable materials(parent & child) with zero price being configurable materials.Configurations are correct in production order material and BOM components(configurable materials). BOM item selections, Item quanties are also correct.
Sales order costing is working fine and rolled-up correctly as per costing settings. We have looked at costing configuration for production order and did not find anything unusual.
Kindly suggest possible reasons for not showing costing result in production order as per configuration copied from sales order or any possible configuration or master data likely missing ?
Thanks in advance.
Kind Regards
Ganeshan KalembethDear GANESHAN KALEMB,
Kindly open production order in change mode and reschedule order, cost order, check material availability and check capacity availability.
after doing this in main menu goto > log > overview > see error list if there is any, let me know, your problem can be solved.
Thanks
Muhammad Ashfaq -
Costing issue-Why Info record price is not read ?
Hi,
We have an issue while costing a Material procured externally.
Valuation Variant >>> Priority 1-Info record price. >>Priority 2-Material Master valuation price.
However, system is picking the price matained in the Material master.
I have verified the validity of the info record and the Blocks on the Vendor and seems ok.
Are there any specific checks need to carry out to know if the info record is a valid one.
Any idea why system is picking Price from Material Master?
Your help is appreciated.
Kind Regards
Umapathi GHI Umapathi
Does any scheduling agreement exists for this info record
refer this link.. This issue is pretty common these days and has been discussed many times in the forum
CK11N- Material cost estimate with & without agreement
Regards
Ajay M -
Costing issue in production order
Dear all
My problem I have 25 pc component quantity . first6 I have issue (261) 1 quantity against that sys has generated one material doc and then issued(261) 24 quantity ,sys has generated second material doc. In production order cost analysis is showing 25 quantity planned cost but in actual cost showing only one quantity .why?
Means EX . material cost is 1 rs in material master .
planned cost is 25
actual cost is showing 1 rs for first issue material cost
why system is not showing rs 25 actual cost in cost analysis in production order?Surendra,
A silly question but worth asking, have you tired displaying the order after the 2nd goods Issue, so times database updation take time. Please check now.
Regards,
Prasobh -
Regarding planned delivery cost issue in MIRO
Dear SAP GURU,
we have a requirement which has been elaborated below
ME21N:- (45-1)
We have creates PO, the details are
MMR : - COPPER
QTY : - 100 KG
Unit Price : - Rs. 10 /-
Total price : - Rs. 1000/ -
FRC1 (Fright /Quantity) :- Rs.5 /- per unit. (Hence for 100 kg it will become Rs.500/-)
MIGO:-
We have done 4 GRN for one PO. For example
ME21N MIGO
5-1(20 KG)
5-2(20 KG)
5-3(20 KG)
5-4(20 KG)
5-5(20 KG)
When we have checked all the delivery charges for each grn document, we found that the system automatically bifurcates total delivery charges of Rs. 200/- into Rs. 20/- in each GRN document.
MIRO:-
1) In this level the system is not bifurcate the delivery charges at all and it showing cumulative value in the line items.
2) But for the each GRN quantity posted, can be seen in separate line item in the transaction level. For example
Existing behavior:-
Amount Quantity Reference
Rs. 200/- 20 Kg 5-1
Rs. 200/- 20 Kg 5-2
Rs. 200/- 20 Kg 5-3
Rs. 200/- 20 kg 5-4
Rs. 200/- 20 Kg 5-5
Rs. 500/- 100 kg FRC1(Condition type)
In this case the system is not bifurcating the delivery cost as per GRN wise.
Our requirement is:-
Amount Quantity Reference
Rs. 200/- 20 Kg 5-1
Rs. 200/- 20 Kg 5-2
Rs. 200/- 20 Kg 5-3
Rs. 200/- 20 kg 5-4
Rs. 200/- 20 Kg 5-5
Rs. 100 /- 20 Kg FRC1(Condition type)
Rs. 100 /- 20 Kg FRC1(Condition type)
Rs. 100 /- 20 Kg FRC1(Condition type)
Rs. 100 /- 20 Kg FRC1(Condition type)
Rs. 100 /- 20 Kg FRC1(Condition type)
Rs. 100 /- 20 Kg FRC1(Condition type)
Hence our requirement is all the planned delivery charges should be bifurcated in the transaction screen.
Conclusion:-
1) Please let me know what the configuration settings we need are.
2) If not, any suitable note available for such sceanario.Hi ,
I do not have any issue related GR quantity but delivery charges are being not bifurcated instead that it is showing the cumulative quantity or value
reagrds
praveer -
Planned delivery cost Issue in MIRO
Hi Folks
We have an issue with Delivery cost condition while doing MIRO. We recently changed pricing procedure and added a condition for fuel surcharge. We moved these changes to SAP PRD system.
When user adds additional line item (e.g. 0020) on a purchase order (That were created before these pricing schema changes were moved to PRD) forsay unplanned delivery cost and saves it with no GR.
Now the line item 0010 on PO has 3 different conditions populated in pricing. So here how my PO looks like
Line item 00010 - material X - Price (PBXX = 1000 USD)
Condition ZDS1 = 100 USD
Condition ZTLL = 75 USD
Condition ZFTT = 50 USD
Lime item 0020 - Cleaning charge = 200 USD
When I try to post MIRO for this PO, ON Miro Screen, I see following 8 items that does not make sense.
item 1 price of material Qty 1 Amount 1000
item2 Qty 1 Amount Blank ( For condition ZDS1)
Item 3 Qty 1 Amount Blank ( For condition ZTLL)
item 4 Qty 1 AMount Blank ( For condition ZFTT)
Item 5 Blank Qty Blank AMt
Item 6 Blank Qty Blank AMt
Item 7 Blank Qty Blank AMt
Item 8 This for line item 00020 Qty 1 amount 200
Do you know why is this happening by changing pricing procedureHi,
It is not recommended to change the pricing procedure in productive environment directly, when transaction documents exists with the previous pricing procedure. If you change the pricing procedure, it may lead to inconsistencies while processing existing documents with old pricing procedure.
Once you change the PO, new price determination takes place, which brought all the pricing condition types as per the new pricing procedure. The same is pulled in MIRO without value, since these conditions were not there at the time of GR. In your case, you may ignore the additional conditions in MIRO and proceed.
If you want to change the pricing in productive environment, you should proceed as explained in the note: 388112 - Change of pricing procedures in the production system
Regards,
AKPT -
hi all
can any body thrugh some lights on the following issue
I have created a planned order for a SFG/FG & converted into process order when iam analyzing the costs unable to see the origin value in COR2 & unable to have the split
i have not maintained the selection for Material Origin in material master/costing1 & not maintained the variance key for raw material specially
plz.. let me know the solution
i really appreciate the early response
thankas in advanceHi Rammurthy
Thanks for the response
while Execution of the Ck11n iam unable to see the total split of the different overheads & The consumption of different materials along with the activities,
plz.. suggest me what to do
waiting for the reply
thanks in advance
regards -
Hi all,
While doing Migo for i am getting cost wrong
My PO is 100000 INR including Excise amount and 5% VAT on it total PO value is 105000, INR
While doing MIGO the system is calculating the amount as follows
Base amount 100000
Excise: bed: 9066
EDU: 181
HEDu: 91
MRP indicator is checked in
Now the amount uploaded on cost is
90662( without excise) + 5000(Vat 5% 0n 100000) 466.9 (VAT 5% on 9066181+91)
But i should be 90662+5000=95662
Could you please help me how to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance
SAPUSER5Dear,
what is the tax procedure are you using? Please check the calculation steps of VAT in your TAX Procedure...
Please let us know you tax procedure...
Br,Vivek
Maybe you are looking for
-
Can't connect to volume of shared iMac but used to be able to
I'm really hoping someone can help me with this as I've been struggling with it since my upgrade from Tiger to Leopard. I run OS X 10.5.2 (all updated,etc.) on two machines - an Intel Macbook and iMac, with an airport extreme base station (updated) a
-
Five days ago I received an anonymous email with the subject: Your Apple ID was just used to buy full album Elton John £12.99.Your receipt No.37930343160405752 The content started: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 From:(my email address) followed by
-
Field cost centre is a required field for GL account Error
The error that I get during a sales transaction is: Field cost centre is a required field for GL account Error. Where or which transaction in FI do I use to maintain this setting. Thank you.
-
I just wanted to say without this forum I would not have a working computer. I have worked in the computer field for 7 years and built countless systems. Imagine my surprise when I recently built a system based on a Prescott and learned that building
-
Help my computer decided I don't need photoshop...
Hey all, Having serious problems. I had to reinstall mac OS X as my computer had problems and now when I try to use photoshop it says I have to reinstall it etc but its CS3 I think and I have absolutely no idea where the discs are for my suite. I rea