Miro - Difference
Dear Gurus,
My client requires in case of Any difference as per PO and Miro it is going to price variance inlcuding frieght variance and other charges and everything is going to price variance account but my client requires the material variance has to go the price variance gl and other variances like freight and other charges of import variance should go to other freight variance gl account.
Please help me in this regard how i can do this.
Regards
Sreenivas.P
Hi,
Maintain diff. Act.key & accural key for related condition types at pricing procedure.The proper G/L a/c assigned for that Act.Key.
regards
Similar Messages
-
Dear All,
I have created one purchase order with a single line item of 2000 qty.
In this purchase order, Transportation & octroi charges are there.
I posted 2 GRN's of 1000 qty each.
At the time of GRN system has posted a document against each GRN for delivery cost (DCGR) with 2 line items one for each condition,
Ex:
S.No Material doc Line item value
GRN 1 ************ 1 1,00,000
DCGR 1 *********** 1 5000 (Octroi)
2 8000 (Transportation)
GRN 2 ************ 1 1,00,000
DCGR 1 *********** 1 5000 (Octroi)
2 8000 (Transportation)
But at the time of invoice verification (MIRO), system is showing 4 line item, like
S.No Value Ref doc
1 1,00,000 GRN 1
2 1,00,000 GRN 2
3 10,000
4 16,000
Why system is combining the respective charges in single line item?
Why it is not showing 6 line items as in GRN??
Thanks
ShubhamHi,
Still my question is not answered.
My query is:
I have created 2 GRN's of 1000 qty each against a PO line item having qty. 2000 that means i have created GRN for total qty.
Now when i am going to verify the GRN i.e. MIRO, in MIRO screen system is proposing 4 line items
1) 2 line items for respective GRN of 1000 qty each
2) 1 line item for delivery cost (Octroi) of 2000 qty
3) 1 line item for delivery cost (Transportation) of 2000 qty
If suppose I want to verify only one GRN then i have to change the qty of both the delivery items from 2000 to 1000 and corresponding amount also i have to change.
My Q's are:
1) Management dont want to allow to change the quantity at the time of invoice verification??
2) If i have created 2 separate GRN's and accordingly system has posted the delivery costs, then why at the time of verification system is not showing the same delivery charges in different line items as in GRN. if it is possible then user dont have to change the qty at the time of verification. -
Dear all,
pls kindly look into the issue
As the vendor invoice qty & value is higher than the PO qty & value so the user is using Correction
Indicator and adjusting the amount accordingly as in vendor invoice for all line item : Qty 12 and Amt 420.60
and Tax Code : G5
After the simulation the Balance is Zero and the simulate entry is correct, but end-up with error.
ITEM AMOUNT QUANTITY
EX 1 350 10
2 315.45 9
3 350.50 10
4 385.55 11
5 315.45 9
TOTAL 49 QUANTITY IN PO
BUT RECEIVED 60
THEN HE IS RAILSING DEBIT NOTE FOR EXCESS QUANTITY.
AT THE TIME OF MIRO HE IS GIVING 420.60 IN INVOICE AMOUNT COLUMN AS A VENDOR ERROR IN CORRECTION ID COLMUN
ERROR IS COMING AS FOLLOWS
Balance in transaction currency
Message no. F5702
Diagnosis
A balance has occurred in transaction currency 'INR' with the following details:
Exchange rate '00', amount '0.01' and currency key 'INR'.
The data in the transaction currency were transferred from the calling application.
System response
Your data cannot be processed in FI.
Procedure
The error is probably in the calling application.
sumathiDEAR ALL, PLS
ACTUALLY PROBLEM IS COMING ONLY FOR THAT PO.
I AM GIVING EXAMPLE
I HAVE CRATED 1 PO, WITH 5 LINE ITEMS AND 17 MATERIAs for allLINE ITEMS.
WHILE POSTING MIRO I GOT SAME ERROR I.E BALANCE IN TRANSACTION CURRENCE AS 0.01
BUT I HAVE DEDUCTED 0.01 FROM ONE OF LINE ITEM AMOUNT EX 70.1-0.01=70.9I HAVE
ENTED AND I WAS POSTED MIRO FOR ALL LINE ITEMS
BUT I HAVE USER PO AND GR IS THERE.THAT IS 49 MATERIALS WITH 5LINE ITEMS,I AM RAISING
DEBIT NOTE FOR 60 MATERIALS BUT NOW ALSO SAME ERROR,BUT I HAVE APPLIED SAME
PRINCIPLE.HERE ITS NOT WORKING
I HAVE CREATED MANY MORE PO"S WITH SAME MATERIALS AND SAME VENDOR.
EVERY 1 IS READY TO POST MIRO WITH OUT ERROR.EVEN AFETR ARROE ALSO I AM APPLYING
AND ADJUSTING SAME AMOUNT THAT IS 0.01,THEN PROBLEM IS SOLVING.
BUT ERROR IS COMING THAT PARTICUAL MATERIAL SIZE ONLY.
LET ME KNOW
NOTE: IN THAT PO TO MIRO DIFFERENCE IS COING THAT IS IN PO 1751.75 AND MIGO AMOUNT
IS 1751.80
IN PRINT PREVIEW FORMAT I AM ABLE TO SEE 1751.75 BUT IF I CALCULATE MANUALLY
FOR ALL 5 LINE ITEMS AMOUNT IS COMING AS 1751.80.
WHT IS THE REASON -
Inventory Management 0IC_C03 customizations
Dear Experts,
I have a task in hand to implement Inventory Management in SAP BW 3.5. Now, this is the first time that we will be implementing anything related to Logistics and I havenu2019t done so earlier in my support projects. I have got 10 hrs of downtime.
I need to fetch the report for both Trading as of now.
The fields needed in the report by the customer are:
Plant
Plant Description
S. Loc.
S.Loc. Description
Opening Stock Qty,
Opening Stock Value,
Receipts against PO Qty,
Value,
Receipt against STO Qty,
Value,
Receipt against return SO Qty,
Value,
All Other Receipts Qty,
Value,
RevaluationValue,
Miro Differences,
Issue against SO Qty,
Value,
Issue against STO Qty,
Value,
All Other Issues Qty,
Value,
Closing Stock Qty,
Value,
Book Inv Qty,
Physical Inv Count.
I am planning to define these as Zkey-figures and write routines in update rules based on processing keys to capture each qty and value separately.
My questions are:
1) What are the fields from above that can be pulled from standard BI Content Reports (if possible, please specify which report)? OR fields (or combination of fields) that are already in the cube?
2) For every above field, customer has given standard movement types.
For ex: for Receipts against PO = Mov Types 101,105,123,162 (Doc Type IN/IM)
for Receipt against STO = Mov Types 351, 352 (Doc Type UB)
But when brought in BI, all routines are based on processing keys (BW Transaction key). Where can I find mapping of each processing key to the corresponding movement type?
If you know which processing key can be used for above fields, please let me know.
3) What are the other fields that need to be considered in routines. If possible please specify field wise.
4) Should I extend the 0IC_C03 with these new custome KFs creating a new zcube or should I add only required fields in zcube.
If I follow the latter, will there be any impact on standard BF/UM runs as in If I load till PSA and from PSA I follow my customized update rules terminating into my customized cube?
Thanks friends.BJ,
My questions are:
1) What are the fields from above that can be pulled from standard BI Content Reports (if possible, please specify which report)? OR fields (or combination of fields) that are already in the cube?
~ You will get fields from the Cube only.
2) For every above field, customer has given standard movement types.
For ex: for Receipts against PO = Mov Types 101,105,123,162 (Doc Type IN/IM)
for Receipt against STO = Mov Types 351, 352 (Doc Type UB)
~ Check this Table in Source system for BW Keys : TMCLVBW
But when brought in BI, all routines are based on processing keys (BW Transaction key). Where can I find mapping of each processing key to the corresponding movement type?
If you know which processing key can be used for above fields, please let me know.
Check this table
3) What are the other fields that need to be considered in routines. If possible please specify field wise.
That depends upon your requirement in the report or Check the standard Dcoument for Inv management in SDN search.
you will get lot of help.
4) Should I extend the 0IC_C03 with these new custome KFs creating a new zcube or should I add only required fields in zcube.
If I follow the latter, will there be any impact on standard BF/UM runs as in If I load till PSA and from PSA I follow my customized update rules terminating into my customized cube?
~Best Practice and even SAP Recommends Make a ZCUBE and then enhance or customize to fullfill your rek.
No impact follow IM steps for BW.
Make sure you keep these things in Mind:
There are 3 SAP delivered transactional data sources for stock management.
2LIS_03_BX : Always needed to carry the initialization of the stocks.
2LIS_03_BF : Initialize this in source if you need historical data else an empty init can be done for this to load only future delta records. If the Source system is new then no need to do an initialization.
2LIS_03_UM : Only needed if revaluations are carried out in Source. This data source is helpful if adjustment in material prices is done time to time otherwise it wonu2019t extract any data.
2. Check list for source system. Needs to be carried out before initialization of the above 3 data sources .
A. Table TBE11 : Maintain Entry u2018NDIu2019 with text u2018New Dimension Integrationu2019 and activate the flag(Note 315880)
B. Table TPS01 : Entry should be as below(Note 315880)
PROCS u2013 01010001
INTERFACE - SAMPLE_PROCESS_01010001
TEXT1 u2013 NDI Exits Active
C. Table TPS31 : Entry should be as below(Note 315880)
PROCS u2013 01010001
APPLK - NDI
FUNCT u2013 NDI_SET_EXISTS_ACTIVE
D. Tcode u2013 MCB_
In most cases you need to set the industry sector as u2018standardu2019. For more info please see Note 353042
E. Tcode u2013 BF11
Set the indicator to active for the Business warehouse application entry. This entry may needs to be transported to the production system. (Note 315880)
3. After running the setup data, check the data for the fields BWVORG, BWAPPLNM, MENGE. If no data available in these fields then some setting mentioned in the above checklist are missing in R/3. Correct the issue and rerun the setup data.
4. Data staging with DSO for BX extractor is not allowed. Data should directly load from extractor to Cube only once. Choose the extraction mode as u2018Initial Non-cumulative for Non-cumulative valuesu2019 in the DTP.
5. DSO is possible for BF. If you are creating a standard DSO then choose the fields MJAHR,BWCOUNTER,MBLNR,ZEILE as key fields. Some of these fields wonu2019t be available in the standard data source but the data source can be enhanced using LO Cockpit (LBWE) to add these fields. In addition to these other fields depending upon the DSO structure is also possible.
Note 417703 gives more info on this.
6. Point-5 is valid for UM also. The Key fields could be a combination of MJAHR,MBLNR,ZEILE,BUKRS fields. Note 581778
7. Data load to the cube should follow the below process
A. Load the BX data. Compress the request with stock marker(uncheck the marker option).
B. Load the BF and UM init data. Compress the loads without the stock maker(Check the marker option).
C. The future delta loads from BF and UM should be compressed with Stock marker(uncheck the marker option).
8. If in future the cube needs to be deleted due to some issues then the load process should also be carried out as above. (only init of BF and UM should be loaded first and then the deltas should be processed)
9. To check the data consistency of a Non cumulative cube the standard program SAP_REFPOINT_COMPLETE can be used. To check the compression status of the cube the table RSDCUBE can be refered. Before the compression of BX request, the u2018REFUPDATEu2019 field should be blank and after the compression the value should become u2018Xu2019. Check Note 643687 for more info.
10. After BX data load to cube the data wonu2019t be visible by LISTCUBE. Only after compression the data can be seen by running a query on the Non cumulative cube.
~AK -
Value difference for GR/IR Clearing Account in case of MIGO and MIRO.
Hello Experts,
One of our client has asked me about clarification regarding GR/IR Clearing Account shows different values when MIGO and MIRO posting. Scenario is that,
SEZ
Calculation of import Duty
Input goods
Material Base Value
2,171,385
Landing Cost
21,714
For computing Customs landing charges need to be added
BED @
10%
219,310
Loaded in material cost
CVD, @
12%
289,489
Credit taken
Customs Education Cess
3%
15,264
Loaded in material cost
ADDL Duty
4%
108,686
Credit taken
Customs Duty
632,749
CVD
12%
219,310
All duty
4%
108,686
Cenvat
327,996
CST
43,427.70
2214812.7
Hence Material cost in GR/IR should be Rs. 22,14,813
Diff (2219092-2214813= 4279)
Whereas it is taking Rs. 22,19,092
My concern is that GR/IR Clearing Account consider only Material cost and non deductible tax amount i.e. CST which is loaded on material cost but system consider some different values, please check the above calculation. When user post MIRO in that case system automatically konck off GR/IR Clearing Account and post difference amount i.e. RS. 4279 to Inventory Account which is wrong. I dont know how system behaves in such manner.
Please giude me on this issue as soon as possible.
Regards,
Vishal JadhavDiscussion moved. Please use Internationalization and Unicode for CIN related queries.
-
Difference between MIGo and MIRO for GR IR clearing
Hi all,
I hav created one PO in foreign currency for 10 items. GR is happening for all 10 lines with rate say Rs 50. Now when i am doing MIRO with same rate i.e. Rs 50, 8 materials are getting posted correctly. But for 2 materials there is inventory posting for fixed amount (in local currency) irrespective of quantty.this case amount in foreign currency is same but dieefernce for GR/IR account is in local currency.
When line items analysed it was observed that fo these 2 materials exchange rate picked up is different than header exchange rate. the difference in exchange rate is posted to stock account.
In short system icking differen xchange rate for different line items for one invoice ( MIRO is happening against only one invoice)
Can any one please explai this phenomena and any solution for this?
thanksWhen you do aut. clearing and the exchange rates account is set up it will clear the GR/IR account.
There is no reason to change exchange rates -
Exchange rate difference between MIRO and GR/IR
Hi,
Exchange rate difference between MIRO and GR/IR we need to written off as a expense for imported w/off expense and in case of assets we need to post exchange rate difference to exchange fluctuation account. Currently exchange rate difference is accounting under capital work in progress(Asset)instead of exchange fluctuation.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Venkata SureshHi,
At MIRO stage, after entering PO number system will automatically populate the GRN value for selection. Here if you found that invoice value, which you have received from the vendor, is more than the system proposed amount, then you can adjust that diff amount in the GL account tab, which is next to PO reference tab in MIRO.
There enter the exch loss GL account and enter the diff amount.
Thanks,
Srinu. -
Difference between Parking (in FB60) and holding (MIRO) Vednor invoices
Hello FICO Gurus,
What is the difference between Parking a vendor invoice document in FB60 and Holding a invoice document in MIRO ? Is holding and parking is same ?
Regards,
Rajesh.Hi,
Hold
The current status of the document was saved. Only minimal checks were performed, here the balance might not be zero. But no updates were made to Financial Accounting. The data are only saved in a buffer and not in any database. When a document is held, only a preliminary document number is assigned.
if you have Created a ex:201 as hold document.
Field UF05A-TEMPD
Park
The Invoice document is missing some information that is required for posting. In this case we will park the document. Here also some preliminary checks will be performed. Balance might not be zero.But in this case updates were performed.
Ex: Created one document which has status Park
1000 1500000013 2008
It will be stored in tables
BKPF Accounting Document Header
VBKPF Document Header for Document Parking
VBSEC Document Parking One-Time Data Document Segment
VBSEGA Document Segment for Document Parking - Asset Da
VBSEGD Document Segment for Customer Document Parking
VBSEGK Document Segment for Vendor Document Parking
VBSEGS Document Segment for Document Parking - G/L Acco
VBSET Document Segment for Taxes Document Parking
VBKPF u2013 BSTAT is V
I hope this information helps.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni -
While posting MIRO price difference account is not determimg for price vari
Hi Sapients,
Please solve the production issue which we have faced yesterday while doing month end closing
In one P.O 4 items are there,User has posted entries in below sequence
Material type is TRADING GOODS
1)first MIRO with QTY 10 @100$ each,Later
2)MIGO has done with QTY 10 @100$
Raw Material account -
1000$
to GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
1000$
2)User has reverse the MIRO transaction with QTY 10 @ 100$ each.(with refer to step1)
3)Finally he post MIRO with QTY 10 @ 90$ each, so here ther is no qty variance has come only price variance has come, so when posting the difference is not going to price difference and the entry is paasing like this
GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
900$
TO Vendor 900$
If u see in step 2 GR/IR having 1000$, but in step 3 while MIRO posting GR/IR as 900$ so for the remaing balance 100$ not going to price variance .I Belive the entry in step will be like this
GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT -
1000$
TO Vendor 900$
TO Price difference 100$.
Kindly give solution why it is not going to price difference it was happening only for item 2 & 3 only for 40 iem it is posting correctly to price difference account.Please advice me why system behavig differently for each item.
Thanks & Regards
YSRHi Padmasri,
Thanks for your explanation. Ok. if the price is maintained in S, does that mean the price difference would get posted only to PRD. In other words, if price indicator is V, is that the only time when the price difference gets posted to stock account. In case if there is no sufficient stock or if there is negative stock at that time, that's when the amount would get posted to stock loss or gain account. Please suggest if I've understood the concept right.
Hi,
The PRD will trigger when the standard price maintained in the material mater record is different from the price in MIGO . The other chance is the material is maintained with MAP and MIRO done before GR ,The value of the quntity (not available in stock )
will get posted to PRD. I hope this will resolve your issue. Thanking you
You had suggested: The other chance is the material is maintained with MAP and MIRO done before GR ,The value of the quntity (not available in stock ) will get posted to PRD. I hope this will resolve your issue.
You are right: I forgot to mention that the price indicator is V. The other point is we purchase the materials from an internal vendor, as and when the materials are dispatched from the main storehouse in Sri Lanka, there is an advice that is created in the system and that is interfaced and parked in the system. However, normally until the GR is done IV will not happen. But there could be a chance, as the advice gets created within 24 hours. However the material to reach the godown in our warehouse will take more than 24 hours as the goods have to be shipped from SL, so IV is possible before GR.
Regards,
Soujanya -
Exchange rate difference not getting posted to KDM account during MIGO/MIRO
Hello Gurus,
I have a purchase order with many line items. For some of the line items, the exchagne rate difference between the date of MIGO and the date of MIGO is taken to the KDM account. But for some other line items, it is not being taken the KDM. For such line items, the value of the GR/IR account in the local currency is different from MIGO to MIRO. Due to this, the GR/IR clearing is not happening automatically.
Do you have any idea, why the system is not taking the different to KDM for some line items and taking it correctly to KDM for others.
The only difference that I noticed between these 2 line items was
In case where the KDM account is determined, the GR was done for only one line item
In case where the KDM was not determined, the GR was done for more than one line item.
Thanks in advance for your replies
Thanks and Regards
VenkateshHi Venkatesh,
I suspect that in your system may be the setting in OMRW is not activated. If the CCurr indicator is not activated for respective company code. Please refer to the information from note 980402 :
After you implement this note, you can use Customizing transaction OMRW to make settings for the new logic for each company code and each currency (the first local currency and two other material ledger currencies, if the material ledger is active). If the CCCurr indicator (V_169P_PK-KDHW) is set, this activates a new logic for calculating the exchange rate difference (KDM amount) in the company code currency (first local currency). As a result, the system also generates KDM lines for purchase orders with account assignment and for purchase orders with MAP materials in inventory management and in invoice verification if required. If the material ledger (ML) is active, you can set a corresponding indicator for additional ML currencies.Bear in mind that the system performs a 1:1 cancellation for the KDM line in the cancellation transactions.
If the indicator is not activated, then the new logic for calculating the exchange rate difference is not active.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni -
Exchange rate difference while posting ME21N MIGO and MIRO
Hi All,
I am facing one problem with exchange rate type between M and EURX and EURX is maintanined in the SPRO>SAP Netweaver>General Settings>currencies>Check Exchange rate types
EXRT : EURX
Usage : EMU Reg,fixed
Ref.Curr : EUR
Buy.ra.at
Sall .Rat.At
Inv
EMU :X
FIXED
Scenario:
Company(USD) is maintaning Exchange rate type: M and no exchange rates are maintained for USD:EUR or EUR:USD.
Eur is maintaing in Exchange rate type EURX.
1) PO (ME21N) is posting for the Vendor on posting date 01/01/2008. Transaction currency is EUR and company code currency is USD and Quantity : 25000
--> Exchange rate 'M' is not maintained for EUR and values are picking from the EURX Type. In the PO, Exchange rate is picking correctly from the EURX table entries on 01/01/2008.
2) MIGO: GR is posted on 01/25/2008 and with 15000 Quantity. Exchange rate is getting currecly from the table on 01/25/2008.
3) MIRO: IR is posted on 02/15/2008 and Vendor Account is picking correct exchange rate from the table but GR/IR account is caluculations EUR:USD is differntly .
Note: It is not GR based IR.
Ex:
PK AC DESCRIPTION Tran Curr (EUR) Local Curr USD
31 5004789 Vendor Account 24,718.48- 38,777.12- USD
86 2525000 A/P-GR/IR NON-INV 24,718.48 38,883.73 USD
91 6584785 SERV-OTHER O/S 0.00 106.61- USD
Here GR/IR account is cal dirrently.
4) Credit Memo posted against IR on 03/25/2008. Exchange rate is given while posting CM same as Invoice. But system rate is different. Here also how the GR/IR is calculating is question is it not taking from Table or from any other rate types . Same problem like IR for GR/IR account.
Entry is posted like
PK ACC Description Tran curr(EUR) Local curr(USD)
21 5004789 Vendor 24,718.48 38,777.13 USD
96 2525000 /P-GR/IR NON-INV 24,718.48- 38,892.22- USD
81 6584785 SERV-OTHER O/S 0.00 115.09 USD
This problem is same like GR and also SPL document is posting differenly for ZG and ZL ledger.
ZL ledger is posting same like Accounting CM document ZG is posting with the different amount . This different amount is nothing but the exchange rate as per the posting date 03/25/2008. Exchange rate on 03/25/2008 is differe from IR date 02/15/2008 .
ZL ledger is calculating based on the 02/15/2008 date and ZG ledger is calculating based on the 03/25/2008 . Difference between Exchange rate entered in the CM and 03/25/2008 table entry rate is showing exchange rate difference field in the Addtional field in the document display.
Thanks in Advance.Dear Friends,
Thanks for your helpful answers, actually we are in big export business. So we have to clear 100s of invoice lines with payments at one go, (which obviously being booked at different dates) so it would be very difficult for the user to go one by one invoice.
My concern is, why system does not calculate exchange rate difference based on actual documents, i.e. Invoice to payments only. I think there might be some configuration needed to implement this functionality.
Please help.
Regards -
Exchange Rate difference posting during MIRO posting
Hi ,
We are facing an issue for exchange rate difference posting during MIRO.
PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date. Vendor in PO has different currency than company code currency. Exchange rate maintained in OB08 for this period is taken in PO.
PO value & GR value is same. Due to raw material cost there was price difference posted during GR posting.
(i.e. Raw material cost - GR/IR value = Price difference amount)
During posting MIGO, 3 accounts got posted.
Raw material cost account got debited & offset credit to GR/IR account & price difference account (in vendor & company code currency also)
During posting MIRO, 4 accounts got posted.
Vendor account got credited with GR/IR amount & offset to GR/IR account debit.
Exchange rate difference account got credited & offset to price difference account (in company code currency only)
Since PO creation , GR posting & IR posting done on same date, then why system has posted exchange rate difference account in local currency only during MIRO posting ?
Your inputs appreciated.
Thanks & RegardsHi,
there is a setting in configuration of logistics invoice verification where you can control the calculation and posting of exchange rate differences. If you had the setting active that exchange rate differences are calculated against a planned exchange rate, that might lead to the kind of postings you describe. Please check.
best regards, Udo -
Exchange rate difference KDM in MIRO - cost center used
We have recently testing to setup KDM Exchange rate difference posting in LIV and encounter the problem of cost center cannot be determine for PO with account assignment A (For asset) and P (for Project).
The question is how does the system determine the cost center for the exchange rate different account? It doesn't take the default cost center from the configuration in OKB9 but extract the cost center from PO Account Assignment - for Asset Account assignment, there is no cost center in PO and thus it is giving a error of 'Field Cost Ctr is a required field....'
Any help appreciated.Dear Murali: Yes, GL account is maintained in OBYC for KDM transaction, I am following the OSS note 980402 for the setup (ECC6 system). The GL account say is 60000005. In OB09, we have maintained the entry for this account 60000005 to have a default cost center (e.g. 1000). This cost center does not get defaulted when MIRO posting is done with exchange rate difference. Instead, the cost center is obtained from the PO (e.g. the account assignment in PO have cost center 5000). But for certain account assignment (e.g. 'P' for WBS and 'A' for Asset), there is no cost center maintained in PO account assignment and thus in MIRO i get an error message as mentioned above.
Dear SAPFICO: check the asset master also, althrough there is a cost center in Asset Master, it does not get extracted into MIRO postings. -
Exchange rate difference in MIGO and MIRO
Dear Experts,
Our local currency is INR.
We have created PO and MIGO on 31.03.2015 with exchange rate 62.5908 without tick on fixed exchange rate in PO. OB08 is also same on 31.03.2015. But at the time of MIRO system showing error massage for configure KDM even if i put exchange rate manually (62.5908) in MIRO.
GR/IR Dr 62.5908
To Vendor NIL
Total 63.5908
I have also made down payment to this in UDS
Local Curr(INR)
Doc. Curr (USD)
Ex. Rate
PO No.
32,081,541.24
505,002.42
63.52750
5500200091
93,721,425.00
1,494,998.00
62.69000
Please advice how can i debug exchange rate 63.5908. if i assign GL on KDM then system will debit this difference in that GL
Thanks in advance. Your suggestions will be highly appreciated.
Best Regards,Hi Monika
Please also exchange how you have set up the treatment of exchange rate differences for your company code for LIV under the path:
IMG>Materials Management>Logistics Invoice verification> Incoming Invoice>Configure how exchange rate differences are treated
Check if you have N or X maintained here. If you have any of this config, you will need to maintain the GL Account in KDM as well
Regards
Sanil Bhandari -
Exchange Rate Difference in MIRO not posted to the KDM account
Dear Gurus,
I have a query, I have defined an account in KDM. After the GR of the PO, if there is a difference in Exchange Rate system posts the Exchange Rate Difference to the Stock Account.
My client wants this this difference at the time of MIRO should be posted to the KDM account. I am invoicing in my Company Code Currency not in PO currency this is also a requirement.
Kindly provide me a solution for this.
Regards,If material price is standard then only KDM account will account.
Check this answered link [Exchange Rate Difference |Exchange Rate Difference]
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Aug 3, 2010 2:13 PM
Maybe you are looking for
-
Itunes won't run because of some problem with my audio configuration? help!
it specifically says "itunes cannot run because it has detected a problem with your audio configuration". anybody know how to fix that. all i did was when my itunes was werking perfectly fine i was uploading some videos onto it but wen i did it was f
-
i have ios 4.3.3 version and when i try to update my iphone to the latest version it with itunes it can't reach the update server. what should i do? p.s.: i don't have any cinnection problem.....
-
Acrobat X Nonresponsiveness: Its Windows Not Updating/Drawing
Just installed Acrobat X Pro and I have noticed---probably related to multiple (3-5) instances open despite lots of physical RAM--that Acrobat instances are not drawing properly. Parts of windows are being moved and attempts to close do not work and
-
Does body temperature in health app really works in iPhone 6
unable to get any data in blood pressure and body temperature widget iphone 6 version: 8.1.2
-
I have finder on icon view and it organisd in View by Kind so that subfolders appear at the top rather than everything alphabetically. However if I edit a jpg in Photoshop and save it all of these stay at the top of the finder view and as "photoshop