MIRO Reversals

Dear Experts,
I m trying to reverse a MIRO Document thru T-Code MR8M, just after posting.
The Invoice of the Vendor is a Pass-On Excise Duty (MRP Tick applied in MIGO).
But during reversal it displays a error : "Balance not zero: 666.14- debits: 12,418.14 credits: 11,752.00"
how should i reverse this document, please give some steps & advice.

Hi,
I got same error message one of my user.
This is happen while posting the GRN with MRP case User has changed Base Value. Now you can't Reverse the MIRO.
You can do one thing Same Qty Raise the Credit Memo through MIRO-Credit Memo Selection post the Credit Memo later post the Correct Values.
Hope IT will Clear. If any clarification revert back.
Regards,
Kishore K

Similar Messages

Freight Charges after MIRO

Hi
Can we add Freight amount on PO after MIGO & MIRO ?
Is that PO will go for Release again?
How the amount will be settled to vendor?
Regards
Ram

Hi
You are not allowed to add new delivery costs in a purchase order once goods receipt has been carried out as these would then be proposed in the invoice verification. The related posting to the clearing account for goods receipt and invoice receipt would not then balance, if no further goods receipt took place.
After the invoice has been received successfully, it is not possible to change the delivery costs in the order. This is because information necessary for problem-free operation is no longer available for the delivery costs that have already been posted for subsequent reversals or invoices, or the operation can no longer be done without errors.
It is also not possible to change delivery costs for stock transfers with SD shipping after goods have been successfully issued, as this can lead to errors during cancellation.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Shortdump when using txn MIRO

Dear all,
I have a question regarding a shortdump I'm getting when using transaction MIRO.
I think I know what is causing the shortdump but I'm not sure how to get rid of this shortdump.
Purchase order:
Quantity 1000
price per unit 1 euro
Invoice verification amount
1) Debit invoice 200 euro
2) credit memo 200 euro
3) credit memo 200 euro
As you can see in the invoice verification the end user has booked twice a credit memo to reverse invoice nr 1 instead of booking only 1 credit memo. In the invoice history we have now negative amount of 200 euro.
I'm not sure how to get rid of this negative quantity because if the user tries to post a debit invoice of 200 euro to make the balance zero then the user gets a short dump. I think this is because of the negative amount of 2oo euro.
Do you have suggestions on how to correct this?
regards,
Camilla

Hi all,
I have analyzed the problem a bit further and I noticed something weird that might be the cause of the shortdumps.
The 2 credit memo's that I gave in my example are reversals (MR8M) of the debit memo. So basically the user was able to reverse a debit memo twice. This should not be possible in SAP. I have tried to recreate the issue but I was not able to reverse a debit memo twice (this makes sense)
I'm not sure if it was because that the system was not stable at that time that the user managed to reverse a debit memo twice.
Has anyone experienced this issue before? Is there any solution to correct this?

Miro Reversal and GR IR Clearing

Dear Friends,
Once Migo and Miro is done and subsequently the miro is reversed while doing auto clearing of GR IR Account, the system is knocking off the original migo and the original miro and leaving the reversed miro as open item instead of clearing the original miro against the reversal miro.
Is this a standard functionality due to cenvat issues or is there some other problem.
Please advice how to take care of the same.
Regards
Mukesh

This is standard only.
When cenvat is there it should be very carefull at the time of MIRO and reversal of same in the same month.
Manual clearing of MIRO & reversal of MIRO documents

Error while posting MIRO

Hi Experts
I got a error like this while posting MIRO
"No amount authorization for customers/vendors in company code 401"
I tried to look out in T043 Table,since i cant able to go further
Let me know the reason for this error and the settings to do
Regards
Amuthan M

Hi,
While creating tolerance group you are specified the authorization group/ Just delete the name of the group you have created and keep it blank OR assign the user to that group and save.
Note:
If you create tolerance groups then the group must be assigned to the users in t.code:OB57 who are posting the transaction. Defining and assigning the tolerance groups to employees is not going to solve, you have to enter the amount ranges of tolerance for G/L document, Customer and Vendor posting.
In t.code:OBA4 create an entry for your company code. (Group creation is not compulsory). If your requirement permits better keep the group column empty. when no group is created its for all users.Double click on company code and enter upper limits and permitted payment differences and save.In t.code:OBA3 enter the ranges for payment differences and any other columns as per your requirement..
Regards,
Biju K

Value difference for GR/IR Clearing Account in case of MIGO and MIRO.

Hello Experts,
One of our client has asked me about clarification regarding GR/IR Clearing Account shows different values when MIGO and MIRO posting. Scenario is that,
SEZ
Calculation of import Duty
Input goods
Material Base Value
       2,171,385
Landing Cost
             21,714
For computing Customs landing charges need to be added
BED @
10%
           219,310
Loaded in material cost
CVD, @
12%
           289,489
Credit taken
Customs Education Cess
3%
             15,264
Loaded in material cost
ADDL Duty
4%
           108,686
Credit taken
Customs Duty
           632,749
CVD
12%
           219,310
All duty
4%
           108,686
Cenvat
           327,996
CST
       43,427.70
2214812.7
Hence Material cost in GR/IR should be Rs. 22,14,813
Diff (2219092-2214813= 4279)
Whereas it is taking Rs. 22,19,092
My concern is that GR/IR Clearing Account consider only Material cost and non deductible tax amount i.e. CST which is loaded on material cost but system consider some different values, please check the above calculation. When user post MIRO in that case system automatically konck off GR/IR Clearing Account and post difference amount i.e. RS. 4279 to Inventory Account which is wrong. I dont know how system behaves in such manner.
Please giude me on this issue as soon as possible.
Regards,
Vishal Jadhav

Discussion moved. Please use Internationalization and Unicode for CIN related queries.

Error in MIRO for input tax calculation

HI Gurus,
We are facing problem at the time of logistic invoice verification in case of purchase orders with account assignments. Following is the set-up for executing MIRO:
1.     Purchase Order with (PO no. 4700000010)
1.1.     Account assignment category.
1.2.     Tax code.
2.     Goods Receipt MIGO
3.     Vendor Invoice booking MIRO
After doing about mentioned steps, document created at the MIGO step shows correct liability and Asset / Expense a/c.
At the time of vendor invoice verification (MIRO), system picks up only CST condition for vendor liability and non deductible excise conditions are reversed against the asset/expenses. For E.G.
1. PO created
Basic amount                   100.00
+ Basic Excise (16%)        16.00 (non-deductible)
+ Ecess             (02%)       00.32 (non-deductible)
+ Hcess             (01%)       00.16 (non-deductible)
+ CST                (03%)       03.49 (non-deductible)
                   119.97
2. MIGO Transaction
Asset / Expenses A/c -
Dr        119.97
To Prov. For Liability                          119.97
3. MIRO Transaction
Provision for Liability A/c -
Dr   119.97
To Vendor a/c.                                       103.97
To Asset / Expenses a/c                           16.00
(16.00 Basic excise duty)
At the time of MIRO, it should had posted
Provision for Liability A/c -
Dr   119.97
To Vendor a/c.                                       119.97
In case Pos without account assignment all accounting entry are posting correctly.
Kindly provide suitable solution ASAP.
Thanks in advance

Hi All,
Thank you for support. But my problem is not getting solved. Situation is as below
Entry is generated
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax     Dr.    25.50
Vendor          Cr. 101.25 (90% split on total amount)
Vendor          Cr.   11.25 (10% split on total amount)
Items are split based on installment payment term correctly. however since tax need to be paid immediately it should split like this:
GR/IR Dr. 100
Tax     Dr.    25.50
Vendor          Cr. 115.50 (90% split of 100 GR/IR value + 25.5 of tax )
Vendor          Cr.   10 (10% split)
Then in OBY6 I enabled amount split. When I try to post invoice in MIRO with amount split I am getting error: Account assignment not completed for all required fields (PayT) Message no. F5A034. And in payment tab payment terms fields are missing. I have ticked 'Enable amount split' in OBY6. and have updated amount split tab.
How to do this in system?
Thanks,
Pushkar
Edited by: Pushkar Marathe on Sep 3, 2011 7:23 AM

Using BADI for changing the Profit Center in FI Document during MIRO

Hi,
We have an requirement of changing the profit center in FI/CO Document while doing MIRO which is different than the one which is posted at the time MIGO.The system is not allowing us to do this and the field profit center during MIRO is not changeble mode and the business requirement is to change this through any SAP enhancements or program.
How can I do this ?
Is there is any standard BADI or User Exit is available for this.
Pleease help me in this and will give valuable points.

Hey,
Use the BADI INVOICE_UPDATE and try with this. Otherwise you try to create Enhancement point to implement your code.
Note: Inside BADI we can't change the runtime value. So, try to use enhancement point.
Rewert back for any clarification.
Regards,
Saravanan M

Runtime error in MIRO while using User/Screen exit

Hello,
I have implemented an exit in ABAP for MIRO which when transported to Quality server through runtime error.
I have used EXIT (SMOD) : LFDCB001 which contains FM -> EXIT_SAPLFDCB_001 and include -> ZXM08U31. In this exit I have written my code to disable Inv. Party field. This field exist in Details Tab in Miro Transaction.
Location of the field: MIRO -> Details (tab) -> Inv. Party (Field)
Code written in include ZXM08U31 is:
LOOP AT SCREEN.
IF screen-name = 'INVFO-LIFRE'.
    screen-input = 0.
    MODIFY SCREEN.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
This exit is assigned to a project in CMOD and I tested the same in Development system. It is working perfectly.
Now I transported the TR (Includes program ZXM08U31 and Customer enhancement projects ZMIRO). Now when I run MIRO in quality server it triggers the my logic and then through runtime error.
Runtime error says:
Short text
    Dynpro does not exist
Error analysis
    The system attempted to use dynpro 0400 in program "SAPLXM08".
    This dynpro does not exist.
I agree that screen 400 does not exists in program for MIRO but it does not exists in development system as well. So if the runtime error is valid in QEC server then why not in DEV server. And when it can run successfully in DEV server why cant it run in QEC server.
Hope I have explained all the things in detail.
Please provide me the solution since user can bombard anytime for the MIRO dump everytime in QEC.
Regards,
Harjeet Grover

Hi Harjeet,
Reason of your Dump is that the enhancement "LFDCB001" which you used contains one Function module exit "EXIT_SAPLFDCB_001" and another one screen exit in calling screen "SAPLFDCB" number 0150.
So when you activate your project these above mentioned both components were activated.
So when you execute transaction SAP looks for called screen "SAPLXM08" No-0400 but as you havn't created and program go for DUMP.
Solution - Just Create called screen "SAPLXM08" No-0400 and activate.
Thanks,
Vijay

MIRO - determinar dom.fiscal "origem" que nao seja o do fornecedor

Boa tarde a todos,
OBJETIVO: "A alíquota do ICMS deve ser determinada pelo estado origem que um fornecedor de frete retira a mercadoria, e não, o domicílio fiscal desse fornecedor".
Algue sabe como, no momento de fazer a MIRO, o sistema tome um domicilio fiscal de origem ingressado manualmente.. e que "nao" tome o do dado mestre do fornecedor?.
Já tentei a solucao do campo "Tax Ship From" no customizing da categoria de nota fiscal, mas nao dá certo pro meu caso, já que com isso, o sistema determinará a aliquota para ICMS de "UF-destino", e o que eu preciso é determinar "origem" distinta.
Voces sabem como fazer, ou alguma ideia?
Obrigada,
Tatiane Camoleis

Que categoria de nota fiscal você está usando?
No standard para o modelo de NF 1/1a era utilizada a categoria E1; muitas empresas criaram a categoria 1E com copia da E1 para nf-e.
Neste caso o que muda na configuração é:
- flag Eletronic NF marcado
- NF cancel type configurado para uma categoria de nf-e (A1 -> 1A)
- Nota Fiscal model configurado como 55 - Nota Fiscal - Model 55
Abraço
Eduardo
Edited by: Eduardo Chagas on Apr 7, 2010 4:11 PM

TAXBRA - MP135 - Excessu00F5es Material + Centro de Custo (MIRO)

Boa tarde.
Aqui na empresa utilizamos TAXBRA e implementamos MP135. Utilizamos a transação J1BTAX (Tabela Atualizar valores PIS e COFINS) para cadastrar os materiais que devemos tomar crédito destes impostos. Desta forma, ao dar entrada na MIRO, caso o material esteja cadastrado na tabela, são gerados os dados de PIS/COFINS, caso contrário, nada é gerado.
Até aí, tudo funcionando corretamente.Ocorre que temos uma particularidade na empresa e não sabemos como tratar:
Alguns materiais podem tomar crédito ou não de acordo com a finalidade que serão utilizados.
Por exemplo, Material = PARAFUSO
No momento da entrada do material PARAFUSO, se este for utilizado em um equipamento industrial, deve-se tomar crédito, porém, caso este mesmo parafuso for utilizado em uma máquina agrícola o crédito não deve ser tomado. A única forma de diferenciação para determinarmos a utilzação do parafuso é o CENTRO DE CUSTO.
Desta forma, precisaríamos cadastrar uma Excessão dinâmica por MATERIAL + CENTRO DE CUSTO, o que, de maneira standard não é possível.
Por acaso alguém conhece alguma situação semelhante ou teria alguma idéia de como poderíamos solucionar este problema ?

Hi,
Please open a new thread in the following forum:
ERP & Business Suite applications (Portuguese)
/community
There, you will be assisted in PT language.
Thanks.
Fábio Almeida
ERP-MM Forum Moderator

Erro na MIRO - V1297

Boa tarde,
Estou com um erro na transação MIRO, quando estou efetuando o lançamento da fatura ocorre o erro: V1297 "A conversão de quantidades de em UN não pôde ser efetuada".
Fiz um teste em QUP, onde lancei a MIGO e a MIRO com sucesso, após lançamento da MIRO efetuei o estorno e alterei o material (MM02) no campo EAN colocando outro codigo. Após essa alteração ocorreu o erro mencionado acima, não permitindo mais o lançamento. Retornei o codigo EAN do material, para o mesmo que estava inicialmente, porém mesmo assim o erro persiste.
No ambienete de produção os usuarios estão com esse erro apenas para uma determinada região. Verifiquei que um dos materiais teve alteração do codigo EAN, porém a maioria não teve.
O que pode estar ocasionando o erro ?
Obrigada.,Dayana

Olá Dayana.
Estou com o mesmo problema...vc conseguiu resolver? Qual foi a solução adotada?
Obrigada,
Daniele

Ct-e Inbound - Campo Nº Serviço (SRVNR) na MIRO

Olá Pessoal, boa tarde.
Estamos implementando o CT-e Inbound seguindo a documentação disponibilizada pela SAP.
Um ponto de diferença é que no pedido estamos usando o mestre de serviço invés de usar somente texto como na documentação da SAP.
No entanto, quando fazemos o registro na MIRO, o código do serviço não é transferido para nota fiscal.
O questionamento feito pela área fiscal é se tem como transferir o código do serviço para nota fiscal.
Obrigado,
Luciano

Olá Cláudia! Boa tarde!
A situação tributária 60 já esta configurada no SAP. Via simulação diretamente na MIRO esta tudo funcionando porém via portal não aparece.
Obrigada!
Att.
Isabela Lima.

MIRO FRETE (ORIGEM EM TRANSPORTATION)

Senhores, bom dia!
Tenho um cenário em meu cliente, onde eu recebo a Folha de Serviço que foi gerada pela VI01 (LES-TRA) para posteriormente efetuar a MIRO e efetuar o pagamento/escrituração do CTe.
Resumo:
Na criação do DC (VI01) foi efetuado um desenvolvimento para determinar o IVA de forma automática lendo o CFOP das Notas das Remessas que foram atreladas do Documento de Transporte (VT01N).
Após a leitura do CFOP identificou-se a necessidade de utilização de dois códigos de IVA, pois em uma das remessas o cliente tem direito a credito de icms e a outra não.
DT - tenho 2 Remessas
Remessa 1 - IVA com credito de icms
Remessa 2 - IVA sem credito de icms (Embalagem)
O grande problema é que o documento de Frete é gerado apenas com 01 item e uma Folha Serviço.
Porém no momento da MIRO preciso utilizar os dois códigos de Impostos para efetuar a escrituração/tomada de credito corretamente.
Tentamos criar o documento de frete com dois itens, porém o valor do Frete fica duplicado.
O ideal seria criar o DC com um item de custo de frete por remessa, desta forma na outra ponta do processo (MIRO) não teria esse tipo de problema.
Agradeço por qualquer ajuda.
Lincoln Malzone
SAP MM

Olá Lincoln.
Eu acho que existe uma questão funcional para ser esclarecida nesse post.
Em muitos casos quando existe uma situação tributária que modifica a escrituração do CTe é necessária a emissão de mais de um CTe então para que ele siga a tributação da NFe.
Mas acho que esse não é o seu caso.
Independentemente de você estar mencionando embalagem retornável ou não, seu produto predominante aqui gera crédito, então acredito que você tenha crédito do valor nominal do frete.
Por favor valide com o fiscal o requerimento primeiro.
Abs
André

MIRO: debito posterior em conta de razão

Prezados experts,
eu tem um pequenho problema na miro na hora de fazer um :'(,
O que acontece na hora de inserir os dados nas telas da MIRO como debito posterior em conta de razão o sistema calcula os valores dos impostos corretamente como se o valor inserido não tem PIS/COFINS incluso no preço liquido, ate aqui tudo certo, mais
na hora de grabar o sistema re-calcula os valores dos impostos novamente como se o valor inserido tem PIS/COFINS incluso no preço liquido,
minha divida e porque o sistema calcular diferente antes e depois de grabar alguma coisa eu estou esqueciendo mais não pozo encontrar a solução.
obrigado pela ayuda
Sds,
Roberto

Ola Eduardo, muito obrigado pela resposta,
eu ja olhe as notas, e ja foram aplicadas nos SPs, mais
ainda tem o problema, so uma pergunta eu te pozo enviar um exemplo por email
para voce olhar melhor o problema?
Um forte abraco
Roberto

MIRO Reversals

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for