MIRO with in third item DIF (little $ difference) we get F5808&KI235 mess.

Hi,
I run MIRO for 1.000 $ invoice; we received GR = 990 $ goods. Then we have 10$ differences which goes in DIF oopération, 601101 cost element.
This cost element 601101 is in OKB9 with company code + Business Area and we wish to get the cost center.
We cannot save the invoice, we have two messages F5808 and KI235.
After debugging, we found, before going to the table OBK9, SAP losts the business area which is the CCIT / BSEG of cost element 601101 item.
Thanks for your answers
Didier

Hi
In some cases, OKB9 at detailed level does not work.. Especially for automatically generated line items
For this, you need to maintain OKB9 entry at a higher level i.e. at company code level...
OR Else,
You need to write the user exit RGGBS000 in CO Substitution
Refer notes below which says OKB9 does not work in certain cases
0000032654 High level automatic account assignment
0000105024 Automatic a/c assignment (OKB9) does not work
0000409520 Goods/invoice receipt: Default account assignment ignored
In case you wish to use the exit, refer the article written by me, which gives the logic as well as the code to be written
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/b0eb4e57-c78c-2d10-e0bd-eca8728e7037
BR,Ajay M

Similar Messages

Balance the item 1 - Vendor invoice with two expense items for two co codes

Hi
In our case document splitting is active with profit centre balancing.
When I am posting a FI vendor invoice with two expenditure items to two difference company codes & cost centres, the system is generating the clearing line items but it is not posting and giving an error message that "balance profit centre data is not there in line item". Since this is a vendor item and no profit centre information cannot be given manually, system has to split the item with relevant profit centre information, right ? But that is not happening, please help me out.

Hi,
Document splitting configuration is done at client level and assigned at company code level.
Document split is done based on the item categories and base item categories configured.
This can be done only for the entities inside a company code and not for the company code and it is done to have a Zero balance check in the entities.
Document splitting is done mainly for reporting purposes.(eg: Segment reporting, Profit center reporting etc.,)
you are posting for two different company codes in a single transaction means it will be cross company code transaction.
System will generate two different document numbers for eac line item and a single cross company code transaction number for the entire transaction.

Exchange rate difference not getting posted to KDM account during MIGO/MIRO

Hello Gurus,
I have a purchase order with many line items. For some of the line items, the exchagne rate difference between the date of MIGO and the date of MIGO is taken to the KDM account. But for some other line items, it is not being taken the KDM. For such line items, the value of the GR/IR account in the local currency is different from MIGO to MIRO. Due to this, the GR/IR clearing is not happening automatically.
Do you have any idea, why the system is not taking the different to KDM for some line items and taking it correctly to KDM for others.
The only difference that I noticed between these 2 line items was
In case where the KDM account is determined, the GR was done for only one line item
In case where the KDM was not determined, the GR was done for more than one line item.
Thanks in advance for your replies
Thanks and Regards
Venkatesh

Hi Venkatesh,
I suspect that in your system may be the setting in OMRW is not activated. If the CCurr indicator is not activated for respective company code. Please refer to the information from note 980402 :
After you implement this note, you can use Customizing transaction OMRW to make settings for the new logic for each company code and each currency (the first local currency and two other material ledger currencies, if the material ledger is active). If the CCCurr indicator (V_169P_PK-KDHW) is set, this activates a new logic for calculating the exchange rate difference (KDM amount) in the company code currency (first local currency). As a result, the system also generates KDM lines for purchase orders with account assignment and for purchase orders with MAP materials in inventory management and in invoice verification if required. If the material ledger (ML) is active, you can set a corresponding indicator for additional ML currencies.Bear in mind that the system performs a 1:1 cancellation for the KDM line in the cancellation transactions.
If the indicator is not activated, then the new logic for calculating the exchange rate difference is not active.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

ICR process 03 with GL open items and

Hi gurus
do you have any idea about ICR with process 03 with GL open items and GL account reconciliation.
thanks in advance
best regards

Hello Lucio,
I am afraid you will have to be a little more specific in your question
It is possible to reconcile GL open items using process 003. In FBIC032 you need to specify data source Documents of Other Process. If you want to only read GL open items for a specific company then you create only 1 entry in FBIC032 for this company and specify data source Documents of Other Process. If you want to read both AR/AP open items and GL open items you have to create 2 entries for this company with different SEQNRs. For one you have to specify data source Documents of Current Process, for the other you have to specify data source Documents of Other Process.
I hope this helps,
Ralph

Different tax codes in the MIRO for single service item

Dear all,
Customer wants to enter 2 different tax codes in the MIRO for single service item. How it can be achieved?

>
Milosavljevic Sreten wrote:
> Just loudly thinking... what can be reason that one service for same invoice is taxable with two different tax codes?
>
It is cross-counties transportation. Part of route outside company country is non-taxable, inside part is taxable. Amounts are proportional to distance and hence become known only at time of invoice receipt.
Users do not want to create 2 separate invoices. They would like to have ability to enter 2 lines in MIRO. But I need your help to understand, how it can be done? Service receipt is done by single line (because actual taxable / non-taxable amount is unknown at that time). So, is it possible to enter non-taxable amount in MIRO in some additional line?

Can I back up an external drive and an airbook with a third drive

I would like to back up an external drive and an airbook with a third drive. This was the setup I used with my Imac. The third drive was linked to the external drive which was linked to the imac. I used time machine. Both the third drive and the external drive were visible on the desktop of the imac. Now I want to use this system to back up the airbook and the external drive, but the third drive doesn't appear on the airbook's desk top, in fact it is invisible and doesn't seem to be recognized in finder or anywhere else from the airbook. Is there some distinction that prevents the airbook from allowing this back up configuration, but that allowed the imac to work in this configuration.
Thanks,
Daviiiiiiid

Of course, always that the external drive is formatted in “Mac OS Extended (Journaled)”. Apart from that, you shouldn't have any issue,
Then, open System Preferences > Time Machine > Options, and remove the external drive from excluded items. The next backup will include your external drive.
Note that you may not be able to back up the external drive if it's connected to your Time Capsule. If it doesn't work, connect the external drive to your computer

Error miro posting in third party sales order

error in miro posting in third party sales order occured i.e, level F1 belongs to cash position(source symbol BNK)....
pls solve the problem it is very urgent...

Hi,
Process
VA01 - Create sales order (Schedule line CS and item category TAS) >> ME52N - PR is generated after save of sales order >> ME21N - Convert PR in to P.O >> Then vendor will send goods to customer and will send invoice to our company >> MIRO - Invoice receipt from vendor >> VF01 - Final invoice to customer
When you enter vendor invoice then you come to know that vendor sent qty. same will be billed to customer(Billing relevance in item category should be F)
Kapil

FS10N balance not tie with FBl3N line item totals

Hi
I searched the forum for posting on FS10N and FBL3N incorrect balances and I did not any post appropriate for my issue. Hence I am posting my issue here.
For a particular month, say 072010, FS10N GL balance does not tie with FBL3N line item totals. I am not sure why. In our case, we did not archive any line items and this is not related to year end carry forward. Year beginning GL balances look fine. We dont have any negative postings. Only few GL balances are off. We are using 4.7 version.
Do you know why this inconsistency and how to rectify it? Is there any program which I run apart from Yead End carry forward?
any ideas really appreciated.
Thanks

Hello
We have already this trouble.
To correct it you need to proceed like this (when NewGL is not activate, with new Gl there is one new programm)
Without newGL
- Block account to be posted (transaction FS00 Block for posting in the company view)
- Delete open item, by using the programm RFSEPA03 (you need to adapt it by a copy because if you don't you can't run it), also this programm will unflag your account in the company view
- Delete line item by the standrd program RFSEPA04
- Create the line item by the standard program RFSEPA01
- if this account is managed by open item, run the programm RFSEPA02 (you need to do the same adjustement of the RFSEPA03)
With NewGL, there is something new. the program RFSEPA02 is linked with a new transaction and you don't have to adjust it FAGL_ACTIVATE_OP. The difference is when you create the open item, you have to define the default profit center and default value depending of the customizing of the leading ledger.
BBest regards
Philippe,
Thanks for the rewards.

MIRO with reference to MIGO number

Hi All,
I want to have MIRO with respect to MIGO Number.
e.g
PO QTY 1000
GRN 1 -
10 Qty
GRN 2------5 Qty
Required scenario:
If we run MIRO then Qty would be 15 Qty
We have a requirement that MIRO is done GRN wise.
like for MIGO # 1 -
MIRO reflects 10 Qty
for MIGO #2----
MIRO reflects 5 qTY

Hi ,
In standard SAP it is not possible to select MIGO no to do MIRO .
Only you can use the Delivary note no. as reference for doing MIRO .
Else , purchase order is always taken as reference and non required line item is deselcted at the time of MIRO .
So please check how best you can use the filed delivary note in MIGO for doing MIRO .
Regards,
Dewang T.

MIRO by GR Line items

Hi,
Some how our system is showing MIRO by GR line items.
Means, We have a PO with single line/single account assignment
We received 5 GR's for the same PO
When doing the MIRO, there are 5 line items were displaying corresponding to 5 GR's
I know that standard system will have cumulative single line in MIRO. But, what could be reason to display in MRO by GR lines??
Your input will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Dev.

Ramesh,
Excellant!!!
Regards,
Dev

While doing MIRO with unplaned cost system is picking accurel G/L account

Dear All,
While doing MIRO with unplaned delivery cost system is picking accural G/L account rather than cost element from PO.
Thanks
KMR

Hi,
It depeneds how the Unplanned Delivery Cost has been configured for the comany code.
SPRO>Material Management>LIV>Incoming Invoice>Configure Unplanned Delivery Cost.
Against Comapny Code put blank if : Unplanned delivery costs are distributed among the invoice items ( here the Materil account or the Account in the PO will be used. )
Put 2 if : Unplanned delivery costs are posted to a separate general ledger account ( here the posting key UPF will be used to determine the g/l account ).
Thanks and Regards

Posting MIRO with reference to MIGO document number

Hi,
Is there any way of posting a vendor invoice in MIRO, taking MIGO document number as the reference instead of PO or Delivery Note reference?
Muru

Hi,
In MIGO you mention the delivery note in the header part.
There is a drop down in MIRO transaction where we enter PO number, please check and you will find the "Delivery Note" option in the drop down list.
you can do the MIRO with reference to this Delivery Note number from this option.
(Just make sure, that you have selected the "GR based IR" indicator in the PO line item.)
Doiong MIRO with reference to material document number of MIGO is not possible in standatd SAP.
Regards,
Gaurav

My Macbook starts up, goes to the white screen with the gray apple, the little loading sign loads, and color wheel appears, and DOES NOT STOP PEIROD!

My Macbook starts up, goes to the white screen with the gray apple, the little loading sign loads, and color wheel appears, and DOES NOT STOP PEIROD!
Even when I restart, shut it down; or when it runs down to no battery, when I plug in the power cord for a while, it loads up to the same stinking screen!
PLEASE HELP ME!

Restart the computer and immediately hold the option key down.
If the computer boots and you see two hard drive icons, use the arrow key to select the Recovery drive, and press Return.
You will get to a screen that looks like the image here:
http://www.apple.com/osx/recovery/
Select the fourth item and press Return.
In Disk Utility, select the hard drive in the left column, then First Aid, then click on Repair Disk.
When that is done, quit DU and restart the computer.

The action could not be completed because of a conflict with the original item. The conflict may have occurred when an existing item was updated on another computer or device. Open the item again and try making your changes. If the problem continues, cont

I have a user on an iMac 10.6 connected to our domain. She uses Outlook web access for email on our exchange server. Last week she received the following message which is randomly preventing her from sending emails. She claims no attachment was involved in the original email when this all started. I have not been able to look at her account as she is out of the office but maybe someone else dealt with this issue. I realize this may not be Mac related but thought I'd give it a try. She did say it occurred once over two days while working on a PC but it continued over the past weekend.
If an internal user tries to send a message with infected attachment using Outlook Web Access, it may report the following error message: The action could not be completed because of a conflict with the original item. The conflict may have occurred when an existing item was updated on another computer or device. Open the item again and try making your changes. If the problem continues, contact technical support for your organization.
This is because F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange has detected a virus in the attachment. If the user tries to send the message again, the message will be sent but without the attachment. At the same time a blank message with an attachment named "Attachment_information.txt" will remain in the user's Drafts folder. The "Attachment_information.txt" will contain information about the virus detected in the message.

PS - have found other posts indicating that clips smaller than 2s or sometimes 5s, or "short files" can cause this. Modern style editing often uses short takes ! Good grief I cannot believe Apple. Well I deleted a half a dozen short sections and can export, but now of course the video is a ruined piiece of junk and I need to re-do the whole thing, the sound etc. which is basically taking as much time as the original. And each time I re-do it I risk again this lovely error -50 and again trying to figure out what thing bugs it via trial and error instead of a REASONABLE ERROR MESSAGE POINTING TO THE CLIP IT CAN'T PROCESS. What a mess. I HATE this iMovie application - full of BUGS BUGS BUGS which Apple will not fix obviously, since I had this product for a few years and see just hundreds of hits on Google about this error with disappointed users. Such junk I cannot believe I paid money for it and Apple does not support it with fixes !!!
If anyone knows of a GOOD reasonably priced video editing program NOT from APPLE I am still looking for suggestions. I want to do more video in future, but obviously NOT with iMovie !!!

Runtime error - FBL1N - vendor balance with customer line item

Hi gurus,
One scenario where i have assign vendor as customer & customer as vendor in vendor & customer data. also make tick mark for both clearing with vendor & customer.
when i see the customer report with vendor item it shows me the customer & vendor dues but when i tried to see the vendor balance with customer line item it gives dump error.
Runtime Errors         PERFORM_NOT_FOUND
Exception              CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_FORM
Error analysis
    An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
    The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_FORM', was
     not caught in
    procedure "%_LDB_CALLBACK" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
    Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
    exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
    The reason for the exception is:
    The program "RSDBRUNT" is meant to execute an external PERFORM,
    namely the routine "CB_DDF_GET_KNA1 " of the program "RFITEMAP ", but
    this routine does not exist.
    This may be due to any of the following reasons:
    1. One of the programs "RSDBRUNT" or "RFITEMAP " is currently being developed.
    The name "CB_DDF_GET_KNA1 " of the called routine may be incorrect, or
    the routine "CB_DDF_GET_KNA1 " is not yet implemented in the program "RFITEMAP
    2. If the program SAPMSSY1 is involved in the runtime error, one of
    the function modules called via RFC is not flagged as remote-capable.
    (see Transaction SE37 Goto -> Administration -> RFC flag)
    3. There is an inconsistency in the system. The versions of the
    programs "RSDBRUNT" and "RFITEMAP " do not match.
Warm regards,
Dhananjay R.

Hi martin
still problem was not solved. actually i am working on ECC 6.0 & not required to implement the sap note on development. i had done the configuration in vendor master & customer master for clearing.
please suggest me.....what to do ?
Than'x
Dhananjay R

MIRO with in third item DIF (little $ difference) we get F5808&KI235 mess.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for