'Missing part' message ar GR reporting

Hi All
Rather than set up an output for the 'Mat xxxxxx is a missing part' message, how can I report on the data on a daily basis?
We have tried setting up an output email that was sent to the respective MRP controller but this was not practable for us
Thanks in advance
Darren

Follow the link and setup the workflow message
http://www dot saptechnical dot com/Tutorials/Workflow/FrmMsg/WFMSG1.htm

Similar Messages

Missing part message in MIGO

Hello,
we have activated the missing part message in MIGO using transaction OMBC.
All is working fine and we receive an notification in business workplace.
The problem is that only one person receives the mail and we want that all MRP controllers get an notification.
In transaction OMBC under "Mail user" we can only maintain one "Recipient Name".
But what is the meaning of "Recipient for mail to MRP controller"? Can we here use position to maintain all controolers in the organization model of the PD (PD-ORG)?
Thanks
Arnfried

Hi There
Specification of the mail recipient- System sends the missing part message to the material planner(MRP Controller) responsible for the material,, in order for this to happen , a user ID must be assigned to the material planner,,
Specification of missing part expediter- if no user ID is assigned to the responsible material planner, the message is sent to the central missing part expediter responsible for the plant. This person is defined per plant,,
So this is what happening in your place,, maintain the user ID to the MRP controller,, then it will work fine,,
Maintain the below settings--
SPRO-IMG-Materials Management-Consumption-Based Planning-Master Data-Define MRP Controllers-Double click on MRP controllers-Maintain the field Recipient Name (User ID) then system will trigger the mail to MRP controllers...
Hope it helps
Thanks
Senthil

Missing part message with transaction MIGO

We want to use the warning message issued by the missing part functionality during GR. We are not interested in the e-mail configuration to the MRP controller. We added checking rule 03 to transactions MB01 and MIGO. We got the missing part message "Mat ######### is a missing part" while using MB01. However, we are not getting the message while receiving using MIGO.
Does anybody know what we are missing? We are planning to use MIGO for our receipts.
Thanks and regards, Jose Oyon.

Go to tcode OMBC and maintain the Checking rule 03 for MIGO and MIGO_GR
than you will see in MIGO
you can make for movement type specific also.

Regarding Missing part message

Hi All PP Gurus,
Can you please tell me the solution for this please ...
If i am having some raw maerial having sufficient stock but i am getting error message for missing part.
So please tell me the solution why is it so?

hi,
I thick the storage loc mentioned in material master and production loc may be different. Check the storage loc.

What is missing part check in inventory

Hi Experts,
I want to know what is missing part check in inventory ?
Thanks !

Hi Dipika,
A missing part is a stock of material that is already assigned to a goods issue at the time of goods receipt.This means that a current requirement could not be covered from existing stock(shortage or requirement undercoverage situation).As a rule,such a missing part bypasses the warehouse and ,upon receipt ,is forwarded directly to the point at which it is needed.However,this is only possible if the entered and the responsible materials planner are informed of such receipt.
You must make following settings in customizing for Inventory management and physical inventory under Goods Receipt>Set Missing Parts Check
1)Activation of missing part check per plant
2)Definition of a checking rule
3)Specification of the details for control of the availability check:To use the missing part check,you must enter a checking horizon for the missing part check.The checking horizon indcates for how many days in the future the system checks whether shortfall quantities exist for the material.Within the checking horizon,an email is sent from inventory management informing the materials planner that there has been a goods receipt for a missing part.
4)Assignment of checking rule:At transaction level,the missing part check uses the same checking rules as the availability check.However,you have the option of maintaining different checking rules at movement type level.The checking rule of the movement type takes precedence over that of the transaction.Note that an entry for the movement type without an entry for the transaction has no effect.
5)Specification of the mail receipient(Email user):The system sends the missing part message to materials planner(MRP Controller) responsible for the material.In order for this to happen,a user ID must be assigned to the materials planner
6)Specifications of missing part expediter:If no user ID assigned to the responsible materials planner,the message is ent to the central missing part expediter responsible for the plant.This person is defined per plant.
Reward if useful
Thanks and reagrds
SHYAM.R

Missing parts check at GR

Hello Gurus,
I have tried to activate a missing part check at stage of GR, unfortunately without success. I concluded a customizing by OMBC and a condition record is defined for a condition type MLFH. Of course a CO24 shows my missing part. In any case no message types is determined in a material document.
What could be reason?
Kind regards
Jari

Hi Jari,
Please see if this helps.
missing part message in MIGO
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45B/helpdata/en/0c/6dec6eb435d1118b3f0060b03ca329/frameset.htm
I have not worked on this scenario yet.
Regards
Shailesh

Missing parts if GR date is past requirement date

why am i getting a missing parts message if the GR date / delivery date of the material is past the requirement date of component in the order? couldn't it be possible to make these components available, for more flexibility in the system?

Hi!,
Please check your "availability check control" for the combination of your checking group (e.g. '02') and checking rule (e.g. 'PP') on trnx OPJJ.
There do the following settings:
1. Incl. Purchase orders: Select
2. Incl. purchase requisitions: Select
3. Incl. Planned orders: select' X'
Or
On OPJK, for your plant and order type combination and avlb check '2' set release material as '1' or '2''. This will help user to release the order even in case of material shortage.
I think this may solve your issue. Please revert back in case of any further issue.
Regards,
Uday
Edited by: Uday Parchure on Oct 3, 2008 7:30 AM

Missing Parts report for Purchase Orders

Hey Gurus,
We are running the availability check for Purchase orders and the user group is wondering if there is a standard Missing Parts report in SAP similiar to transaction CO24 for Purchase Orders so that they can view all of the Purchase orders with missing parts.
As a side note, we are using subcontracting purchase orders.

didn't get a response.

Standard Report for missing parts at production order operation level?

Hi PP Gurus,
            We have standard report for missing parts at production orders level.
For our client, they need a report for missing parts analysis at production order operation level. Do we have any such standard report in the SAP?
Please help.
Thanks,
Reddy.

Hi Arvind,
      Thanks for for your response.
1. List: Components, Layout: Standard layout          set the Missing part
       It shows the component requirement/withdrawn quantity for each operation of production order. It is not showing the commit quantity.
2. List: Components, Layout: Pick list          set the Missing part
       It shows the component requirement/withdrawn quantity for each production order.
3. List: Components, Layout: Missing Parts List-Material View          set the Missing part
       It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
4. List: Components, Layout: Missing Parts List-Order View          set the Missing part
       It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
      We are unable to get the solution from all these 1 to 4 reports from COOIS.
Do we have any option to change the existing layout (ex: 3 ) to get the commit quantity for operation with missing parts indicator?
If avilable, what is the procedure to be followed?
Thanks,
Reddy.

When syncing iPod the PC lost power. once power restored synced iPod but the sleeve detail has been blanked. Also when syncing a 'miss-match' message is reported on iTunes. how do I get the sleeve detail back onto iPod?

When syncing iPod the PC lost power. once power restored synced iPod but the sleeve detail has been blanked. Also when syncing a 'miss-match' message is reported on iTunes. how do I get the sleeve detail back onto iPod?

http://ww2.cs.fsu.edu/~rosentha/linux/2.6.26.5/docs/DocBook/libata/ch07.html#excatATAbusErr wrote:
ATA bus error means that data corruption occurred during transmission over ATA bus (SATA or PATA). This type of errors can be indicated by
ICRC or ABRT error as described in the section called “ATA/ATAPI device error (non-NCQ / non-CHECK CONDITION)”.
Controller-specific error completion with error information indicating transmission error.
On some controllers, command timeout. In this case, there may be a mechanism to determine that the timeout is due to transmission error.
Unknown/random errors, timeouts and all sorts of weirdities.
As described above, transmission errors can cause wide variety of symptoms ranging from device ICRC error to random device lockup, and, for many cases, there is no way to tell if an error condition is due to transmission error or not; therefore, it's necessary to employ some kind of heuristic when dealing with errors and timeouts. For example, encountering repetitive ABRT errors for known supported command is likely to indicate ATA bus error.
Once it's determined that ATA bus errors have possibly occurred, lowering ATA bus transmission speed is one of actions which may alleviate the problem.
I'd also add; make sure you have good backups when ATA errors are frequent

Missing parameter values message when exporting report

Post Author: Gr_Pr
CA Forum: .NET
Using .NET 2005, CR XI R2, and the Crystal SDK for .NET 2005 to generate reports. Basically CR is my application's reporting tool. So, we create a report in CR XI R2, then distribute that report to our users loading it into the .NET application using the Report Document class.
We have a small problem.
Our user's have the ability to use pre-defined 'prompts' that will pass parameters to the reports. Let's say that the prompt will pass in (5) pre-defined parameter values, but the customer wants to run their own 'custom' report using our prompt, but their 'custom' report contains (6) parameters.
If I let the Report Viewer load the report, the user will be prompted for the missing parameter value that was not supplied by the 'prompt'.
If I run the report without loading it into the Viewer and try to export the report directly to PDF I receive an error message from CR stating I have 'Missing Parameter Values' then the report errors out.
Has anyone come across this? Is there something I missed?
I am not real sure as to why you would be prompted by the Viewer and not by the Export Class. This worked fine when using the RDC component, I was prompted for the missing parameter value by both options.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Hi,
The report has it's own ADO Datasource set in crystal reports, so I just pass the log on information to the report object before doing anything else.
this.DataSourceConnections[0].SetConnection("ServerName", "Database", "sa", "Password");
I then do a refresh before applying the parameter values (I do this because the user can preview the report more than one time by using a preview button on the parameter form without re-loading the report object)
this.Refresh();
Then I set all parameter values followed by setting the recordselection formula.

Message for Missing Parts While Creating Order

Dear Friends,
While Creating & Saving The Production Order System Is Not Supporting In Giving A Warning Massage On Missing Parts In spite Of Deficit In Storage Location For Materials.
The Clint Requires A Warning Massage In Case Of Materials Shortage In SL
I Tried To Get This From the Following Method
Checked For Define checking control In OPJK.
Selected plant, Order type & selected the business function 1 for create or 2 for release. And Maintained These Settings
a)     Removed tick mark in No Availability check.
b)     Type of component check Given as - ATP check.
c)      Material release - 1. User decides on release if parts are missing.
d)     PP Checking rule (Which Is same As with plant parameter OPPQ)
e)     In Define scope of check (OPJJ) made a tick mark in check w/o RLT.
Then Assigned the availability checking group at Mrp View of Header material.
In spite Of All These Settings Still At The Time Of Order Release/Save A Warning Massage Or A Informative Massage Is Not Appearing
Please Suggestu2026u2026u2026u2026
Hari

Dear Friends,
I Did The Following Settings
A) Define Checking control      02               Individual Req
                    Total Sales          Single Record
                    Total Div Rec               Single Record
B)Define Checking Rule     PP Check Rule
C)Define Scope Of Check     Availability Check          02 Ind Req
                    Checking Rule               PP Check Rule
          Stock
               Include Safety stock
               Stock In Transfer
               Incl Quanty Insp Stock
And When No tick Mark Is Applied In NO Stor Loc Inspectn
Not Used Checking Group "KP" In components material master.
After Making All This Settings Also Before Order ReleaseWhen Pressed u201CMaterial Availability Checku201D
The System Is Showing All Materials Available In Spite Of Deficit In Storage Location
Suggestu2026u2026

Missing Part Info system

Dear friends
I tried missing order infosystem using Tcode CO24..
Following message is coming "Missing part information system
cannot be used start report PPCOXPR1"
what are the possible reasons.. what i have to activate..
regards,
srihari.,

Hi,
Start the report PPCOXPR1 with the T.code SE38 or SA38.
This is required for the first time..
Start this and revert for further discussion..
Do not do this on your Productive system..
First check with your Test System..
Regards,
Siva

Missing parts for Process orders

Hi Experts,
We are trying to find out the Transaction to faciltate the Missing parts list for the process order even after the order has been completed having the Status TECO, CLSD. This is to understand whether proper enough materials are consumed for the order or not. Based on that Production incharge can ensure the component consumption is made as per the Process order requirement.
We are trying with CO24, this is showing the missing parts list if order does not contain TECO and CLSD status.
Also we are checking with COOISPI, COID, but could find the correct feature out of them.
Do we need to develop any customized report with the help ABAPers.If yes please guide us the method.
Please help us in acheiving the list of components which are not consumed as per the Process order requirement.
Also guide us to identify the list of materials which are excess consumed for the Process order.
Thanks in advance..

Hi Jiaul,
Thank you very much for your reply.
So we need to develop the program to flag the missing parts and its qty even after the Order has the status TECO or CLSD.
Can you please provide logic to develop the Program.
I am thinking to take the inputs from process order required qty Vs withdrwan qty. if the Qty difference is positve, which should come under missing parts. if the difference is still negative means excess qty consumed.
Waiting for suggestions
Thanks in advance

Missing Part list for Plant to Plant Purchase order

Hi,
      I need the following requirement in CO24,
      In CO24 its shows the missing parts for Sales order, similarly we want the missing parts list for Plant to Plant Purchase order in the same report. Also the report,
1.It should not consider the Planned order for a sales order.
2.It should not consider the planned order which can be convert into purchase requisition.
3.The procurement type should be "E" or "X".
Kindly guide me is there any standard layout changes in available or any development we have to do.
Thanks
Muthamil Murugan.G

Hi Purushothaman,
If you have the following settings in OPJK:
Plant                 XXXX
Order Type       XXXX
Availability Check    2
[X]Status Check
[X]Check material availability when saving order (may not need)
Checking Rule        PP PP checking rule
Component Check Type    ATP check
Release material     2 Release permitted despite missing parts
Then in COHV you try to mass release the order with the following parameter:
List: Order Header
Selection: Your selection criteria
Mass processing:
Function: Release
Max. No.of Processes 99
Save Log: Always
Release control order: Collective Order Release
Then after the order is released, you can find the missing part list of that order in CO03 menu path:
Goto->Missing Parts->Missing parts list
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Rachel

'Missing part' message ar GR reporting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for