Missing parts if GR date is past requirement date

why am i getting a missing parts message if the GR date / delivery date of the material is past the requirement date of component in the order? couldn't it be possible to make these components available, for more flexibility in the system?

Hi!,
Please check your "availability check control" for the combination of your checking group (e.g. '02') and checking rule (e.g. 'PP') on trnx OPJJ.
There do the following settings:
1. Incl. Purchase orders: Select
2. Incl. purchase requisitions: Select
3. Incl. Planned orders: select' X'
Or
On OPJK, for your plant and order type combination and avlb check '2' set release material as '1' or '2''. This will help user to release the order even in case of material shortage.
I think this may solve your issue. Please revert back in case of any further issue.
Regards,
Uday
Edited by: Uday Parchure on Oct 3, 2008 7:30 AM

Similar Messages

  • Missing Parts check one level....can you confirm

    Simple scenario.  I have a 3 level BOM.
    Top level Item Mat A (make to order 82) > Mat X (make to stock strategy 40) > Component 1 (purchased).
    Stock: There is only stock for the Component 1
    When I create an order for Mat A I get a missing part for Mat X.  However, the committed date is giving me the Total replenishment lead time of my Mat X and not considering just the lead time to make Mat X even though we have Component 1 in stock. So my problem is that the ATP check is not considering that we have Component 1 in stock and should just give me a committed date for the in production time of Mat X.
    Now I do understand that SAP PP may only look at the Zero stock for my Mat X when I create an Order for Mat A (Top level) - if this is why then fine but I wanted to check I am not missing something.
    Moreover, if you make Mat X a collective (52) then it will see the stock for the component and give a reduced commitment date but my client does not want a collective order as they want to group the Make to stock items.
    Yes if there was a planned order for Mat X then it would consider it.
    My point is that am I right that pure ATP missing part will only consider one level in my example ?
    any help buddies ?

    007,
    I don't know if I would call it a weakness.  It is what it is.  Its like spending the money for a Hyundai, and expecting the features of a Mercedes.  Not gonna happen.
    The client gets as much as he is willing to pay for.  If he wants a multilevel availability check, then he must pay for the additional software that will perform this task (APO or third party), or he should commission a consulting company to write a custom application that performs this task within ERP. 
    All such decisions boil down to the client's willingness to spend money and resources.  Its nothing to get frustrated about.  After all, he is the one that made the decision to buy SAP ERP, not you.  If he is unhappy, he can contact Walldorf.
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Requirement date in Md04 to be adjusted

    hello,friends.
                i have a component A* with lot size mb(monthly plan),plan on 01.12.2007 .
    i used GR Processing time 5 days.To bring component in previous month i,e, on 26.11.207.
                   Now ,my problem is that due to mb lot size & GR time, the requirement/receipt date of the component is  01.12.2007 (minus GR time ).the basic finish date is 26.11.2007 .we have monthly planning & if we see in the COOIS report month wise it showing o.k.,(26.11.2007),but when we see in the MD04 the date in the requirement date is 01.12.2007 appearing that should be required 26.11.2007.How this date can be adjusted.
    regards,
    mangesh

    Hi,
    I'm kind of looking for a similiar answer, I need MD04 (and subsequent customised reports) to display the 'Rescheduling at GR date' - to produce a simple extract for Procurement showing the 1-1 data rather than 1 (minus GR time) - 1.
    The strange part is, this at GR date is available in Exception Message text ..... I wonder why it is not available as a seperate column....?
    Any help appreciated.
    Regards

  • CO24 missing parts list

    Hi All,
    Till last week the missing parts list for a particular MRP controller showed many parts but since this week it only shows some parts and we are not able to find out  the difference between what is expected and what it is showing.
    Can somebdy guide me through the exact process how it searches for missing parts through Availability check.
    Thanks
    Shailesh.

    Dear Shailesh
    Last week there might be No stock for componets, so system might have shown many componets list
    but this week, enough stock might be availble for componets, so system is not showing missing parts
    just check in MMBE for required components stock
    Regards
    kumar
    Edited by: kumar kumar on Sep 9, 2009 12:26 PM

  • Planned order date on requirement date

    Hi ,
    My indepenedt req is maintained for monday .By backward scheduling it gets planned on friday(i.e production endson friday)
    How i can schedule the production to take place in current week . That is for PIR entered on monday , the production should be planned in the current week.
    Are there any settings in lot size   ?
    Regards
    ShankarR

    Hi,
    PIR date is the requirement date.
    When you run MRP with this date, the system checks for Avaialble Stock and receipts and does the Net requirement calcualtion.procurement selection, BOM explosion and scheduling.
    When it comes to scheduling, it looks for the requirement date and schedules it based on the scheduling parameters maintained for the Planned orders.OPU3
    You can set the scheduling type as  it forward or Current date scheduling .
    If you set the Current date scheduling, the system will consider the start date as today and does the scheduling, if after the scheduling the availability date is past the requirement date anexception message is raised.
    Hope this clarifies , please revert if you need any details.
    regards
    Ratan

  • WO basic start date - requirement date

    Good morning folks,
    Would anyone be able to shed some light on any config that would be suitable for the following:
    The materials are assigned to a task list that is then assigned to a plan.  That plan is then scheduled and the work orders are generated.
    When the materials are added to the work order their requirement date is automatically assigned as the work order basic start date - can this requirement date be pulled from the scheduled dates instead?
    The problem is that the material may not be required at the beginning of the WO, so the defaulted basic start date of the WO would not be the way forward.
    Thanks
    Mantas

    hi Mantas
    you can set in scheduling parameters with following possibilities
    <b>Path Plant maintenance and customer service->Maintenance and service order->scheduling->set scheduling parameter</b>
    1)The basic dates are adjusted and the dependent requirements are scheduled for the start dates of the relevant operations.
    2)The basic dates are not adjusted and the dependent requirements are scheduled for the start dates of the relevant operations.
    3)The basic dates are adjusted and the dependent requirements are scheduled for the order basic start date.
    4)The basic dates are not adjusted and the dependent requirements are scheduled for the order basic start date.
    so when you add the components you have to assign the operations,after selecting the operation you can change the operation date, after you change the operation dates,the material scheduled dates will be changed to the operation date
    (using the option <b>1</b>)
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Requirement date in ME2O selection screen.

    Hi Friends,
    I see that requirement date in ME2O selection screen is no where available in the output . Is this equal to PO creation date?

    Actually in ALV grid list out put, the document date is the Requirement date.
    If you analysis the same, you will find the solution.
    See I have analysis the same.
    In my ME2O transaction, I can see the document date as follow for the Purchase order number
    4700048844.
    Here the document date is showing 20.12.2011.
    When I go to to ME23N to display the PO number 4700048844, I can see the document date is different.
    But when I checked the requirement date, then I can see the same date for the PO number.

  • PR Release date in TAB Quantity/Dates

    Hi Experts ,
    When i am creating a PR then In the TAB>Quantity/Dates the release date is coming same as the delivery date .
    As per my opinion it by default should be same as the PR requested date .and when it release by( me54 or me55) .then it will update as the dated on which we are releasing the PR.
    Please Suggest
    Varun Bisaria

    Hi Varun,
    The field 'release date' is a bit confusing. It has nothing to do with
    the date you perform the release strategy (transaction ME54 or ME55).
    The help on the field tells you more about it.
    The release date does not mean PR release approval date.
    In PR table/EBAN-FRGKZ or ME53 screen you can find the 'release date',
    then press F1 -> purchase requisition release date which means for the
    material to be available on the date it is needed the PR must be release
    on xx.xx.xx (date) (that's requirement date less GR proessing time, GR
    proessing time, planned delivery time, and purchasing department
    processing time).
    In ME53 screen -> item detail -> MRP data block (include release date.)
    click 'statistics' icon -> administrative data (include release ind. and
    rel. strategy).
    In ME5A -> press F1 on 'release date' of initial screen which have same
    explain for this field.
    There is no actual PR release date field in EBAN, so in PR display,
    we can not see "actual PR release date".
    BR
    Nadia Orlandi

  • Commited date for missing parts in the production order

    when i generate a prodution order and there are some missing parts for that material. its showing the list of all the missing parts but the commited date is coming out as 12/31/9999.
    I maintained the the planned delivery time for all those components.but still its giving me this date

    Dear Deepu,
    Check in OPJJ for your checking group and checking rule combination what's the scope of check
    defined --->under this you must have included the check box for Check availability without
    replenishment lead time. It Indicates whether, during the availability check, the system checks the
    replenishment lead time.
    Use
    Items for which the delivery date falls within the replenishment lead time, but for which there is no inventory, are confirmed for delivery after the replenishment lead time. In the case of items for which the delivery date falls after the end of the replenishment lead time, the system assumes that everything can be confirmed.
    Procedure
    In the standard version, leave this field blank if you want the system to check the replenishment lead time.
    Dependencies
    If you want the system to check the replenishment lead time, you should make sure that you have entered a value in at least one of the following three fields in the material master:
    GR (goods receipt) processing time (Purchasing view)
    Planned delivery time (MRP I view)
    GR processing time (MRP II view)
    Otherwise, the system confirms every requirement.
    If that check box is included then system proposes the date as 31.12.9999.
    Just remove the check box setting and check once again in CO01 for material availability check.
    Even If the check box is not included and if the End lead time (replenishment lead time)of that raw
    material  is before the order start date then you will not get any mssing part's list.
    Suppose if the replenishment lead time is after the order start date means then you will get this raw
    material under mssing parts list.
    Replenishment lead time = Planned delivery start time + GR processing time of that raw material (this
    starts from today).
    Say let your finished product finish date be 30.03.2009 and order start date be 28.03.2009,and let the
    planned delivery time be 15 days and GR processing time of the raw material be 5 days.
    So in this case End lead time = 15+ 5 = 20 = 01.04.2009 starting from today ,so in this case you will
    be getting this raw material under missing parts because its end lead time time is after the order start
    date.Suppose if its  before order start date you will not get in missing parts.(Even if the check box is not
    included under RLT).
    So check with this and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • Production Order missing Part list error  date 1,857 is not convertable

    *Dear Experts*
    When i m  trying to check missing part list at production Order then system is showing the error
    The date 1,857 is not convertible (please correct) in Production order Missing part list.
    Rgds
    Pankaj Agarwal

    Dear ,
    System is throwing you this message beacue your FC calander is vaild till 2010 and asking you to put the date btn  FC valid from 2004 and FC valid to 2010.
    Goto -OP03-Select the Factory Calnder Tab in change mode  (pencil mode ) -Select the applicable calender  chek box-Double click this -Extende the validit date till 2020 or beyond so that u will not face not only in this particular issue but in many other txn later on .
    Agian -come back to OP03 main screen -Slect the Holiday calaner -Extende the same way  and reassing in Factory calander
    after this , do not forget to re-ssign this FC in respective plant in OP03-Plant assingment .
    Try and revert back
    Regards
    JH
    Edited by: Jiaul Haque on May 27, 2010 3:14 PM

  • Missing Parts in production Order no committed date and qty

    Hello Guru,
    May I ask your help to check our issue when we create a Production order, we got an error Order has missing parts. When check the Availability Check view, most of the components do not have committed date and qty even there are available stocks on them.
    Can you help check what went wrong and its possible solution already check OPJK and OPJJ seems we have correct set up for this.?
    I tried to check in CO09 on one component. from there there is also 0 committed qty and date. While the other component has OrdRes with 0 committed qty and date and there are some with values. Please help thanks.

    Hi Ramagari,
    OPJK
    Plant AAAA
    Ord Type: YYY1
    Avalability Check: 2 (Check availability during order release)
    Material Availability Part
    Check mat. availability when saving order (tick)
    Checking Rule : YP (PP checking rule - Production Order rel.)
    Component Check Type : ATP Check
    Release Material: 1 (User decides on release if parts are missing)
    PRT Part
    Checking Rule : 02 (Status check and inventory audit)
    PRT Release : 1 (User decides to release when there's no PRT)
    Capacity Part
    No check (tick)
    OPJJ
    Availability Check: 02 (Individ. Reqs)
    Checking Rule: 01 (Checking rule 01)
    Stocks parts:
    Include safety stocks (tick)
    Missing parts processing part:
    Checking period: GR : 0
    In/outward movements part:
    Incl. Pur Ord : X
    inlc. pur Req (tick)
    incl. dep req (tick)
    Incl. reserv (tick)
    incl. sales req (tick)
    incl deliver (tick)
    incl. ship notif (tick)
    incl rel ord reqs : X
    incl pld ord : X
    incl prd ord : X

  • Missing part list is incomplete while creating Production Order and 2 components are not shown in the list.

    Hi Team,
    We are facing issue for availability check. During creation of Production order, the missing part list is not complete and it should show componenet A in the Missing part list. Below is the details:
    Production Order quantity: 100 kg
    Componenet A required quantity: 100 kg
    MMBE Unrestricted qty: 1000 kg
    MMBE Reserved Quantity: 2000 kg
    So as per above figures component A should come as missing part during availability check. But it is not coming as missing part. Please check and give your inputs.

    Hello
    The results of availability check should NEVER be compared with MMBE. As already mentioned, transaction CO09 is more appropriate.
    Also, this issue has been already discussed on hundreds of threads in the past. See some examples below:
    Problem with missing parts list during production order creation
    issue in committing material for production order
    Material Availibility check in Production orders
    availability check
    order is not released
    As it is stated on the The SCN Rules of Engagement you should do some research before opening a thread. Therefore, please use the search tool or even google to search for similar problems before opening a thread.
    BR
    Caetano

  • Missing Parts in MDVP

    Hi All - Can any of you help me with the below issue under availability check for planned orders? Here is the scenario, our client needs to run the availability check for planned orders upfront to get a better understanding of what materials will be short before they are converted to process orders. I have been testing MDVP transaction but it doesn't completely satisfy the requirement. Please see the example below and let me know if there is any thing that we can set in config. to fix the issue.
    Lets say there is a Finished good A which has a BOM with components B and C.  To make it simple with numbers, we will need  100 EA of B and 100 EA of C to make 100 EA of A.  We have 3 planned orders created for A for 100 EA per planned order. Available stock for B is 0 EA but we have 100 EA of material C available. Now when I run the collective availability check for these planned orders in MDVP and go to the missing parts list,  I can see that part B is indicated as missing (check box for missing part list) for all 3 planned orders which is perfect as we dont have any available stock. However, material C doesn't have the missing part indicator checked for any of the orders. This is my issue, as we know we only have 100 EA available but the total requirement across 3 planned orders is 300 EA so ideally system should flag material C for the last two orders (based on the dates) to be missing.
    I have checked all threads but couldnot find an answer. I have included  dependent req. and reservations in the scope of check for the checking rule that we are using that way system should include all existing dependent requirements(from these planned orders). Note that commited qty is 0 for all planned orders as none of them could be satisfied because of shortage of B.
    I have tested both individual and ATP check while doing the availability check but it didn't make any difference.
    Note that when I change the requirement Qty for C on the planned orders  to 200 (or any number greater than 100) then system will flag material C for all 3 orders to be missing. So it is more like checking the availability for components individually(per planned order) rather than collectively. I am not sure if there is a setting that will change the way this check is done but this is what is happening for the available quantity of the component.
    Please let me know if you have any solution.
    Thanks,
    Bharath

    Hi Suri - Thanks for your response. I tried both with blank(individual and collective) and 2 (collective req. only) but I still get the same result. I found one other setting that can solve this issue and that is checking the activate full confirmation logic at the the MRP group level in OPPR. I will test more and let you know if that works but we dont use MRP groups here at our client and that is why I was little hesistant to set up collective availability check parameters at the MRP group level. But looks like this is the only option that we can use to get this resolved.
    Thanks,
    Bharath

  • No missing parts for material

    how can i set-up my master data in such a way that when a production order is released, a material ( even if it has a BOM requirement ) shall not look for parts or trigger a missing part check. logic for this is that no one stocks parts for this, ex. water.

    Hi,
    When you create or release process order system checks for the availability of material depending upon the setting done in material master & process order availability check in OPJK.
    Process/production order checks availability of material depending on the check rule assigned to the order type. This check rule is assigned to check group which in turn assigned to material in MRP 3 view (availability check) of material master. For this check group scope of check is defind, thus while checking dependent requirements different stocks will be taken into account.
    If you want materials should not be taken for availability check then
    1. you have to first remove check rule from material master (MRP3 view of material master)
    2. Also in transaction OPJK for the check goup you maintained, uncheck checkbox for no material availability check.    
    Regards,
    Avinash.

  • How to address missing parts during material availability check

    The system prompts that a particular component is missing during material availability check of a production order. Said component is available in the system upon verification in MMBE.
    We noted that the goods receipt date of the material is way beyond the requirement date, hence the system still prompts that it is missing.
    What we did to correct this is to change the basic start date of the production order thus changing the requirement date of the material.
    The resolution unfortunately, brought another problem, another planned order was generated, which consequently generated another purchase requisition.
    What is the proper way of addressing the missing parts prompt during material availability check?

    Hi
    Not able to understand why you are using BAPI & function module.
    It is a simple function of avaialbility check.
    For this you have to fill the availability chk field in material amster of all components &  givecheckinh rule  inOPPQ .
    After creation of process order, you can check COR2 it self.
    It is a std functionality.
    It should definitely work.
    Regards
    YMREDDY

Maybe you are looking for