Modify BADI for Freight Cost Extension

SAP offers BADI /SAPFCX/RELV_PARMS to update user parameters in determining customer freight document relevancy.
I am informed to use this BADI to code so that USER_UserParm1 can be populated. It is provided in function module /SAPFCX/CFI_RELEVANCE_CHECK.
I have tried a variety of ways to understand how to update this BADI, but nothing has proven with an example or instruction.
Has anyone update these BADI in FCX? Could you please instruct me on how to complete this?
Much appreciated,

Go to SE18 and create a new Z implemenation. Enter the name of the SAP provided BADI.
The method with ABAP code will be created. Modify the code and activate.

Similar Messages

Is RGX part of FCX (Freight Cost Extension )

Hello Gurus,
Is RGX part of FCX (Freight Cost Extension add on to R/3) ) ? Looking for your feedbacks.
Thanks

Hi James,
Under SCM: We have the following...
APO
F&R
ICH
EM
ExWM
Under APO you have
DP
TPVS
SDM
GATP
PP/DS
TM
SPP
SNP
Can you tell under which FCX falls under. Assuming routing guide is part of FCX.
Thanks

How to define routes for freight cost calculation

Hi,
in our company we plan to use LE-TRA Transport with Freight costs calculation. To use Transport it is a must to maintain routes in all sales orders/deliveries. Currently we do not use it and now we have the challenge to define routes and later due to freight costs calculation Stages. There are different solutions for routes. In some other companys we have only routes dependent on the Transit duration, but that's all. They don't use stages and they don't use freight cost calculation in SAP.
As I know routes should describe geographical locations (The way location A till location B). Based on the route we have a defined stage with a distance, shipping type.... That would mean for a company: They need to analyse all delivery channels with different forwarding agents and so on. Is that possible when the forwarding agent is responsible for scheduling? That means for a company with customer around the world thousands of routes?
Alternatively it is possible to create stages in the transport documents. Is that more recommendable? It would be nice, when someone could post his experience with that topic.
Thank you,
Raphael

Hi Luis,
thank you for the response. My problem is not the technical view. I know how to create the routes and what kind of information I need. The problem is to unterstand how this concept can operate in practise in a company with many different customer.
The following site describes the concept of routes in SAP:
http://blog.tkreddy.com/2010/09/17/understanding-the-concept-of-routes-le-shp-in-sap-ecc-6-0/
A company with many delivery plants and customer around the world needs to forward all delivery channels they have to us, A route describes an area and includes stages with location A and B. The stages are assigned to a forwarding agend. Based on that information I can start a freigt cost calculation. The structure of stages and routes also depends on the situation how many different forwarding agents are involved in a delivery process.
In my opinion it is really a big effort to find a reliable solution for the amount of routes and stages. I am thinking about to use the solution to create the stage manually in the transport document and to use the routes to describe the transit time.
Raphael

Subsequent Debit/Credit for Freight Costs

Is it possible to configure additional indicators for subsequent debit/credit specifically to capture freight costs that would then flow those costs down to the material? What is the proper process for this activity?

Hello
For subsequent cost accounting, the Process Trip Cost Accounting could be helpful.
Check the link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/EN/b7/c44bc19d5411d189b60000e829fbbd/content.htm
Reg
Suresh

Post freight cost to a different a GL account during 411-K for consignment PO Process

We are planning to implement PO consignment for one of the client.
The scenario is, client pays the freight cost to the supplier in advance upon receipt of consignment stock .When consignment stock is moved to own stock (411k), during the movement of the stock we need to create two accounting entries one for the material cost and the other for freight cost such that the freight can be adjusted with advance paid freight cost. Freight cost can be settled manually with another PO but the requirement is moving average price of the material should include the cost of material and freight cost .
For an example if the material cost is $100(PB00) and freight cost is $10(FAR1 - 10%), during 411k it should create two entries one for material cost($100) and the other for freight cost($10) which can be adjusted manually.
We tried by adding freight condition (FRA1) in consignment info record along with PB00 –Gross price and in this case during 411k it is summing both the prices($110) and posting to one GL account and the same settles during MRKO but what we are looking for is how we can split this into $100 and $10 .
I know standard SAP does not support this this during 411k.
I want to know if there is any User exit, pricing procedure, routines, etc... Or any other way that can be used to achieve this requirement. Appreciate more detailed answer

Hi,
   As you know, currently the delivery cost are not supported in consignment and pipeline settlement. The system design is explained in the note: 208555 - MB11 Delivery costs for pipeline and consignment.
   If you want delivery cost in consignment, you have to go for development. There should be additional entry for delivery costs in RKWA table. I am not sure about the feasibility, but still would like to share the below points:
   For creating additional entry in the accounting document while doing MB1B / MB11, you may check the BADI AC_DOCUMENT.
   You may refer the note: 165647 - Documentation: Enhancement RMVKON00 (MM-IV) which explains some enhancements related to consignment settlement.
Regards,
AKPT

Documentation about Freight Cost Extentions

Hi,
Can anybody provide documentation about the FCX freight cost extentions - Business process, reading materials and configurations?
Thank you.
Regards

Jürgen,
this presentation addresses the point about RCM and not specifically about FCX. It never says if I can implement FCX without a link to the Rail scenario that is explained and for which I'm not necessarily interested in. And it does not give enough details about it neither.
I'm sorry you lost your time searching for this presentation in particular, but it's not the documentation that is asked for nor the answer to the original thread "Freight Cost Extensions" - business process, reading materials and configuration.
Nevertheless, I will indeed follow your advice and contact SAP for it. I was hoping that since 2007 when this document was created, more information was reachable and someone on SCN would be able to help out without having to contact SAP directly.
Thanks for your swift replies up until now!
Salvador

BADI for tax

Hi Experts,
Can anybody tell me how the BBP_TAX_CODE_DETER_BADI and BBP_TAX_CODE_MAP_BADI works. Which Badi is triggered first and how the system determines the tax code using these Badi.
Help will be highly appreciated. Thanks in Advance.
Regds
Vin

Hi Vinod ,
Determine Tax Code--> BBP_DET_TAXCODE_BADI
Change Tax Data--> BBP_TAX_MAP_BADI
Calculate Tax for Freight Costs -->BBP_FREIGHT_BADI
Thanks & Regards
Pradeep Kumar Dondeti

Freight Costing - Problem of G/L account with Cost Center

Dear Gurus,
In VI02, I have the following u201CAccount Assignmentu201D message of error:
u201CG/L account 60900000 cannot be used (please correct)u201D
u201CComparison of the field selection strings from the G/L account 60900000 and the account assignment category K reveals that there is an incompatible combination of field selections for the field selection group 'Earmarked Funds'.u201D
Questions:
Bearing in mind that I am in the Shipment Cost cockpit, I need to mention that the system directly allocated me the following Account Assignment Category: u201CKu201D for u201CCost Centeru201D.
1- I could there either way create another Account Assignment Category for Shipping instead of Cost Center
2- The system tells me about an incompatible combination of field selection, how can I change that field selection to make it compatible? There are so many possibilities that I get bogged down in choosing the right combination.
I have been to OME9 and OB14 to try to maintain fields, however those fields have different values or names.
My aim here is to coordinate a G/L account group with a Cost Center for Freight Costing
Can anyone help?
Thanks
Chris

Dear Zafar,
If you desire you maintain two different cost centers for the two company and you need to have both of them posted on the same G/L account and Cost element, I would advice you to:
- create a Z table where by controlling area you define where the specific cost center need to get posted
- include this validation check in the exit for validation for controlling
- include this validation check in the exit for validation for finance
- include this validation check also in the sales order user exit
Standard SAP seems do not have direct link between cost centers & cost elements. For this reason ideal solution is to generate a table where you may define you needed structure.
E.g.: some ideas on the table you may create
Controlling area
Cost element from
Cost element to
Cost center from
Cost center to
I hope this suggestion may answer to your need.
Regards,
Viviana A.

Full Freight Cost payment to Vendor irrespective of GRN Quantity.

Hi MM Gurus,
I have a requirement where our client have to pay to Vendor for Frieght Value in the first bill (Vendor send many bills based on the GRN quantities) only irrespective of the GRN Quantity.
E.g I have a PO of 100 Qty and the Frieght condition value as 100 INR. Now, We have done partial GRN of 10 Qty only so the INR 10 is inventorized on the material for freight cost during GRN. But we have to pay 100 INR (full amount of Freight Condition) to vendor during MIRO for partial bill of 10 quantities of which we have done GRN.
I have tried doing in MIRO by entering full value 100 INR and 100 Quantity in MIRO for freight Condition but due to tolerance defined in system the invoice goes for block for payment. Actually, the concerned user do not have authorization for the release of blocked invoices (MRBR) and we cannot change the tolerance also because it comes under Audit.
I was thinking whether we do have something in Condition type settings where we can pay full frient cost to vendor in the first bill only irrespective of the Partial GRN?
Please suggest me on this.
Regards,
Neeraj

Hi,
Create a freight vendor separately and assign that condition for th freight vendor in conditions of PO and for that freight vendor do not check the G/Rbased.
In this case after creation of PO you need to do MIRO woth planned delivery cost selection in that screen and then you get a pop up where in you can select your freight venodr and make invoice verifiation for that freignt vendor and later you can go with GR for as much ever quantity as you are in need.In this way it wont effect the freight price with respect to your inward quantity.
Thanks.

Re: Freight Cost during MIRO

Dear All,
Need help...I configured the following steps in order to capture freight cost during MIRO. but during MIRO,
the GL account captured/defaulted to freight cost is same as the expense accnt instead of the freight cost account..
eg. Expense -1111
      Freight   -2222
      Vendor - 3333
Created 1 PO and maintain the ff:
PO is 1 line item 1pc=1000
ZFR1 - Condition type for Freight cost = 200
At the time of MIRO ( we dont have GR processing),the screen display 2 line item for the expense and freight cost but the GL account defaulted in the freight cost is same as expense account instead of the freight account. then if do a simulate, the following are the entry (which is wrong)
Vendor   1111                 1200
Expense   3333              1000(-)
Expense   3333                200(-)          * supposed to charge to my freight accnt 2222
below step i configured.
created new condition type ZFR1 (copying std FR1B)
put B- Delivery cost and tick 'Accrual' in the settings
maintain transaction event ZFR and posting key
assigned GL acccount to ZFR
include the condition type ZFR1 in the calculation schema, put ZFR in the field 'accrual'
Appreciate all your advise. many thanks in advance.
Rgds,
She

Hi,
Check your OBYC settings whether you have assigned the correct GL for the new trans Key.
Regards,

Freight costs per KG when PO order is in PC, how to solve?

Hi,
My client want to make use of a condition type in the purchase calculation sheet which covers the freight costs per KG. The case is that we also order per PC. How to solve this problem? Which condition type can I use for freight costs per kg?
Thank you in advance,
Eric van Zundert.

Hi,
Which condition type can I use in the PO for this purpose?
Thank you all,
Regards,
Eric van Zundert

Freight costs to be payable to third party in a PO

Good morning,
In order for freight costs to be payable to third party in a PO (Incoterms of Ex-Works) I believe you need maintain a separate vendor for this condition type, at the time of creation of the PO.
How do you link a condition type to a vendor?
Many thanks,
Matt

Hi Matt Potts,
During creation of Purchase Order, you have to carry out following steps;
(a) Select header condition or relevant PO Line items
(b) Add your Freight condition and add your values in Ammount (based on value or in %)
(c) Select above Freight condition and click condition details (magnifier)
(d) Add your Vendor code in Vendor Field (KOMV-LIFNR)
Bye,
Muralidhara

Reducing the Freight cost on material value for undelivered material

Hi Experts,
Summary : The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material. The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded. The details scenario is mentioned below :-
We have to make a Purchase Order with material code say ABC for procured of some material. Suppose we make a Purchase Order for 100 nos. at a Unit Price of Say Rs. 10/- for Material Code ABC on say Vendor M/s XYZ. A freight condition is maintained in the Conditions Tab and suppose the Freight is Rs. 10 per unit of the material.
While preparing the Goods Receipt through MIGO, in the Freight Tab we select say freight vendor say M/s PQR against the freight condition and post the goods receipt.
While doing Invoice Processing in MIRO, when we enter the combination of Purchase Order and Planned Delivery Cost the system will populate the vendor codes of both the supplier of material and the transporter. On selecting the transporter the freight amount will populate against which the invoice of the tranporter can be processed.
In the Vendor Master of M/s XYZ GR-Based Invoice Verification is activated.
The vendor is allowed an under tolerance of 0.5% (i.e. the vendor should deliver at least 99.50 nos. of the Purchase Order). If the vendor delivers 99.50 or more then there will be no deduction in the freight charges.
But suppose the vendor delivers only 99.4 nos. of the quantity. Then we will prepare the GRIR for 99.4 nos.only. But while processing the MIRO we need to deduct 1.5 times the value of the material from the freight amount for the shortshipped quantity, i.e.
0.1 no (99.5 u2013 99.4) X Rs. 10/- * 1.5 = Rs. 1.5 are to be deducted from the final payment from the freight amount of the transporter.
The material supplier will have to be paid in full 100 nos. of quantity and will raise an invoice for 100 nos. A dummy GRIR for the 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will have to be prepared for processing the invoice for the 100 nos. of the material supplier and a dummy issue for 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will be prepared to remove them from the system.
Hence the freight cost for this 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will also go into the cost of the material and increase the MAP by that amount. Also the goods issue Cost will also have the effect of the freight cost.
We do not want to load the freight cost for the undelivered material in the value of the material.
Can any one please suggest a solution for the same.
Thanks in advance.
AJ.

Hi
A PO Will be raised for full quantity of material say 100 nos.
The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material.
A freight vendor is maintained at the time of GR for material against the freight condition maintained in the Po.
The freight vendor facilitates the delivery of the material from the vendor to the purchaser for which he is given an under tolerance limit of 0.5%. Any delivery below this tolerance limit, freight amount to the effect of 1.5 times the per unit rate of material x short fall below 0.5% tolerance will be deducted from the freight amount.
A dummy grir will have to be prepared for the short delivered quantity for processing the invoice for the full quantity of the purchase order, as the vendor is going to raise the invoice for full purchase order quantity. The client does not want to load the freight cost of the undelivered quantity on the material value as it will wrongly show the MAP of the material. This shortshipped material will be issued to remove it from the system and the stock will remain for the delivered quantity only. The vendor is subject to gr based invoice verification.
Please suggest a solution.
Thanks in advance.
AJ
The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded.

Reducing freight cost for undelivered material

Hi Experts,
Summary : The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material. The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded. The details scenario is mentioned below :-
We have to make a Purchase Order with material code say ABC for procured of some material. Suppose we make a Purchase Order for 100 nos. at a Unit Price of Say Rs. 10/- for Material Code ABC on say Vendor M/s XYZ. A freight condition is maintained in the Conditions Tab and suppose the Freight is Rs. 10 per unit of the material.
While preparing the Goods Receipt through MIGO, in the Freight Tab we select say freight vendor say M/s PQR against the freight condition and post the goods receipt.
While doing Invoice Processing in MIRO, when we enter the combination of Purchase Order and Planned Delivery Cost the system will populate the vendor codes of both the supplier of material and the transporter. On selecting the transporter the freight amount will populate against which the invoice of the tranporter can be processed.
In the Vendor Master of M/s XYZ GR-Based Invoice Verification is activated.
The vendor is allowed an under tolerance of 0.5% (i.e. the vendor should deliver at least 99.50 nos. of the Purchase Order). If the vendor delivers 99.50 or more then there will be no deduction in the freight charges.
But suppose the vendor delivers only 99.4 nos. of the quantity. Then we will prepare the GRIR for 99.4 nos.only. But while processing the MIRO we need to deduct 1.5 times the value of the material from the freight amount for the shortshipped quantity, i.e.
0.1 no (99.5 u2013 99.4) X Rs. 10/- * 1.5 = Rs. 1.5 are to be deducted from the final payment from the freight amount of the transporter.
The material supplier will have to be paid in full 100 nos. of quantity and will raise an invoice for 100 nos. A dummy GRIR for the 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will have to be prepared for processing the invoice for the 100 nos. of the material supplier and a dummy issue for 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will be prepared to remove them from the system.
Hence the freight cost for this 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will also go into the cost of the material and increase the MAP by that amount. Also the goods issue Cost will also have the effect of the freight cost.
We do not want to load the freight cost for the undelivered material in the value of the material.
Can any one please suggest a solution for the same.
Thanks in advance.
AJ.

answered

User exit/BADI for condition type in shipment costing

Hi! Does anyone know of any user exit or BADI or function module we can use to populate a value to a custom condition type we have created for shipment costing? We want to calculate the customs duty charges based on the purchase price of the item in the PO. As such, we need to go extract this information on the PO and populate it on the condition type.
Appreciate any help on this.
Cheers!
SF

Dear SF,
These are the Exits available in the shipment cost process.Take help of ABAPer to choose the appropriate one.
V54B0001 Shipment costing: Configure pricing
V54B0003 Shipment Costs Calculation: Determine Rate Type and Cur
V54B0004 Shipment Cost Calculation: Determine Status
V54C0001 Shipment costing: Description(s) shipement cost item(s)
V54C0002 Shipment costing: Create shipment cost sub-items
V54C0003 Shipment Costs Processing: Determine Invoicing Party
V54C0004 Shipment Costs Processing: Determine Loc. for Tax Invoi
V54D0001 Shipment Costing: Determining the Tax Countries
V54KSFRC Determining the factors for apportionment of shipment c
V54P0001 Extended Function Codes for Shipment Cost Information
V54U0001 Shipment cost processing: Check whether changes made
V54U0002 Check shipment costs for completion
V54U0003 Specification of shipment cost number
V54U0004 Formatting for update of new objects (shipment costs)
V54U0005 Updating new objects in shipment cost processing
V54U0006 Shipment Purchase Order - Header Data Supply
V54U0007 Shipment Purchase Order - Item Data Supply
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Modify BADI for Freight Cost Extension

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for