MTO - Settlement of Sales Order to COPA

Hi,
We have a scenario wherein production order is created with reference to Sales order.
No standard / Sale order BOM is maintained. As such no cost estimate is available for either Header material or sales order. Header material does not have any value.
Goods are issued to production order with reference to such sales order, as special stock. So consumption posted to Sales order.
Revenue is captured on Sales order.
At this point of time, can I settle the sales order through VA88. What all will it settle.
Is RA excution a must for VA88 settlement?
Please suggest.

HI,
if you need to have WIP-value posting, result analysis is a must before settlement.
Best regards, Christian

Similar Messages

Settlement of Sale Order to Sale Order

Dear experts
I need help in the following scenario:
At my client place we are doing job work for external material. All the material are supplied by the customer and our client will do the processing and send it back to customer's customer on customers request.
To create Excise Invoice against the Customers Customer we are handling through 2 sale orders.
First One Sale order will be created against the Customer Order and Sale price will be the selling price of Customers to Customer.
Second Sale Order will be created for Job Work Charges for the processing the materials.
On settling the process orders all the cost is settling to Sale Order One, Clients revenue is coming from Sale Order Two.
Here I need to settle the First Sale Order to Second Sale Order. I have given the second sale Order number in first sale order number in Settlement rule.
But when I settle the First sale Order all the amount it going to Price Differance Account.
How to settle the Cost of First Sale Order to Second Sale Order?
Regards
Kiran A

Dear Experts
any advises.
Can I go for Sale Order to Sale Order Settlement ?
Regards
Kiran

Settlement of Sale Order issue.

Dear friends
I am getting the following error while settling the Sale Order in VA88.
Please guide me in this issue, how to handle?
There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.
Message no. KD256
Diagnosis
The sender has a results analysis key, but no accrued values.
Either the accrual was not yet started for the sender, or the values to be settled from the accrual equal zero.
Note
Actual costs are only settled once the sender is technically completed or finally delivered.
This applies to
Projects that cannot carry revenues
In Service Management for sales order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in sales order production) set in the accrual version for
Production orders
Internal orders with no revenues
Orders with no revenues
In Service Management for engineer-to-order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in engineer-to-order production ) set in the accrual version for
Internal orders with no revenues
Orders with no revenues
In Service Management to the indicator (Calculate WIP for internal and service orders with no revenues) set in the accrual version for
Internal orders with no revenues
Orders with no revenues
To the indicator (Calculate WIP for production orders without settlement to material) set in the accrual version for
Production orders without settlement to material
Procedure
1. If necessary, start the accrual calculation for the sender
2. Restart settlement

Now I am getting another error.
Complete PA transfer structure ZR
Message no. KD514
Diagnosis
There is no value field assignment for cost element 911400 / *_variance category COSR_* in PA transfer structure ZR, or
PA transfer structure ZR has no assignments, or
No "Origin" is maintained for the assignments in PA transfer structure ZR (cost element group and, if applicable, variance category)
When I see the Variance Category I didnt find any Variance Category COSR?
What could be the reason.
Thanks in advance
Kiran

Rebate settlement at Sales order level

Insight requested..
How to do rebate settlement at sales order level, generally rebate settlement is done after the invoice creation and with reference to accounting document.

Dear sud
The definition for rebate is A rebate is a special discount which is paid retroactively to a customer. This discount is based on the customer's sales volume over a specified time period.
Having said that if you are willing to give some discount to your customer, on the order itself, we can call it as DISCOUNT and it should not be called as REBATES.
For discounts, you can create a condition type and assign it to your pricing procedure.
Incidentally, can you please let me know what warrants you to ask this question. I am sure, the sales process won't be like that.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

How to settle the sales orders

Hi experts,
Can anyone tell me how to settle the sales orders? What is the transaction code?
regards
vk

Hi VK ,
Being production consultant I think production order which is created with reference to sale order will be settled in ko88 or co88 after calulating variance ( and settling in variance a/c ) , Work in progress .
Prod order should have TECO indicator before you settle .
Neal

Production Order settlement to Sale Order

Hi Gurus,
I have crated a sale order through VA01, I crated sale order specific BOM through CS61 and after that I executed Cost Estimate for the sale order.
Sale Order No: 260
Finished Product : 610
Semi Finished: 611
Semi Finished: 612
I executed MRP for sale order 260, System has created planned production for Material 610,611 and 612.
When I am trying to convert the planned production order to production order, system is automatically picking up settlement rule as Material instead of sale order for all the production orders. System is not allowing to change the settlement rule manually.
Our requirement is, Production Order of SFGs(611 and 612) should be settle to Production order of Finished Product(610). and the total cost of the production order of Finished Product(610) should be settle to Sale Order (260).
How can I get the above settlement rule into my production orders as default.
Please help me in this regards and guide me if i am going in wrong way.
Thanks in Advance
Ganesh
Note:
1. Our scenario is Make-To-Order.
2. I am using same Order Type for all the production orders.

Hi Venkat
When u manf SFG - SFG declared to stock and all calculations for WIP or Variances are done for SFG material depending on the order status
When u settle if the material is SFG in the production order - FI postings are done to relevant accounts for SFG matl
Now when the SFG matl is used in production of FG, SFG is consumed and Production order created for FG will have either WIP or variances and settlement is executed.
For settling to sales order
Create settlement profile with sales order selected as valid receiver, and assign the profile to the Production order type. Here u need two production order types
1) One normal production order - here normal settlement profile is attached
2) One order type for sales order production. Here u attach sales order settlement profile. Create allocation structure for this purpose
You can only one order type and settlement profile for both SFG and FG
Postings to relevant accoutns for SFG and FG is taken care thru valuation class and account determination
Hope the above clarifies - pls assign points if the above is useful

Results analysis for a project to be settled to sales order rather than PSG

Hi Experts
My client has two company codes.
CC1 executes project construction for CC2. This is to be mapped as a customer project.
As far as project settlement is concerned, since PA is not activated, it is proposed to settle to sales order item.
In this situation, what would be effect of results analysis.
With out PA, how the postings need to be handled with WIP, Reserves, Inventory and Revenue.
warm regards
ramSiva

Hi,
I have had this problem earlier, If PA is not abailable you have put in the settlement rule as not to be settled.
And for the postings have to be managed using the GL accounts that we give in the result analysis configuration. There is not much flexibility for customization here in this scenario. But you can do as much as possible using the diffrent result analysis categories.
So for the reserves WIP inventory and revenue use result analysis category to segregate them by GL account
Thanks
Naveen

Settlement to Sales Order

Dear All,
I am trying to do the Settlement to Sales Order.
In the Project I maintain the Settlement Rule for the Each and Every WBS as uppar WBS, and the Final Upper WBS/ 1st Level WBS i maintained to Settlement Rule to Sales Order Lilne Item. ( Before i created Sales Order and I assinged 1st Level WBS to that Sales Order)
When i am doing Settlement Rule for the 1st level WBS, system shows, the following mesage
The sales document is assigned to WBS element XXXXX
Message no. V1139
Diagnosis
The sales order item contains a project account assignment.
Procedure
Enter the number of a work breakdown structure element which is included in the same project definition as the work breakdown structure element from the sales order item or assign a sales order item without project assignment.
Regards

As your scenario is of Assembly processing. You have to consider how the requirement type & Requirment class get determined for the Material entered in your Sales Order. You might be aware but check below link how the requirement type & Class get determined in case of Assembly processing.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/ab/5d487a733311d2b6600000e82d8bd1/content.htm
Either you might be using SD Item Category or Material Master Main Stretgy will be prevailing for determining requirement type. From that you find the Requirement class And in requirement class there will Acct. Assign Category ..
Also check you customization in below nod.
IMG>PS>Material>Control of Sales-Order-Related Production>Selection of Requirements Type Through MRP Group
IMG>PS>Material>Control of Sales-Order-Related Production>Selection of Requirements Type Through SD Item Category
With Regards
Nitin P.

Error While doing settlement for Sale Order in MTO scenario

Hi,
In MTO Scenario - when i try to settle Sales Order i am getting the below error. Even i have maintained the settlement cost element for PSG in allocation structure A1.
Kindly help me
Define a settlement cost element for receiver type PSG
Message no. KD506
Diagnosis
In allocation structure A1 (controlling area BP01), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type PSG.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
Thanks
Kishore

Hi
Please check your allocation structure , it looks that settlement cost element that you have assigned in the allocation strcuture is not having correct cost element category.
Go to Allocation structure configuration (OKO6) and check your allocation structure A1.
check settlement cost elements is it by cost element or you have assigned separate cost element for settlement.
if you wants to settle with same cost element select By cost element.
if you wants to settle with different cost element create a cost element and assign settlement cost element.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di46c2/helpdata/EN/9d/1f4b6e5733d1118b3f0060b03ca329/frameset.htm
hope this helps you.
Regards

Error in Settlement Document - Sales order

Hi,
In MTO Scenario, for Bulk Sales order we have done partial Delivery and billing to customer but for COPA value appeared for line item wrong value,
i.e.
1. Sales order item # 100 Quantity & Material (H1PA16006ISNKB0006) 5 MT
2. Sales order Item # 200 Quantity & Material (H1PA09006ISNKB0006) 1 MT
for the above Item no 100 Partial Delivered 6th Sept' 2010, 4 MT,Settlement completed through VA88
again the above Item no 100 partial Delivered 10th Sept' 2010 1 MT Settlement completed through VA88
Second Sales order Item no 200 Fully Delivered 8th Sept 2010 1 MT Settlement completed through VA88
(Totally 3 settlement document in period 006.2010)
Due to some reason i have done Settlement reverse but in System taken
Sales order no 100 for 1 MT not consider 4 MT with value
and second sale order no 200 1 MT fully.
could u tel me what was wrong in my document and how can rectified these documents...during settlement
Thanks & Regards
Vinu,

Hi Ajay,
it is one of the requirement from our client.
I have post this issue earlier and my client was accepted to do partial sales order settlement on daily basis, now three copa document was wrong value so i have reverse the document but system taken consider latest document,
is their any chance to change COPA Settlement document ( Record type C)...i need add one characteristics i.e. material Group in the COPA Document
Thanks & Regards.
Vinu

CC transfer order = posting as 'sales order' to COPA of sending plant (CC)

Dear all,
we are using cross company transfer orders for tranferring stock from plant A (belonging to CC A) to plant B (belonging to CC B). Therefore the purchaser of B enters a purchase order for vendor A (assigned to plant A in the vendor master data). In the material requirements lists of plant A we see the requirements from this purchase order. Based on the purchase order, a delivery is created for delivering from plant A, followed by an intercompany invoice. The intercompany invoice data are sent to COPA of operating concern A & controlling area A.
Our SCM department (belonging to plant A) does part of the planning based on COPA reports, in which the sales orders to external customers are included. However we would also like to include the requirements (including values) triggered by the purchase orders from B. Does anyone know whether, and how this is possible in standard SAP. Or does anyone have an idea, how we could set this up?
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
Mireille Velthuijse

Hi Ankur
It cant happen that copa doc is not posted when PSG is specified in the the settlement rule
As regards Val Strategy, you should assign Val Str 001 to record type C and PV=01
br, Ajay M

Block production order creation in MTO scenario when sales order is blocked

Hello Experts,
We are using the MTO scenario and creating production orders with refernce to sales order using CO08.
The requirement is to not allow the creation of production order when the sales order has a block. It can be an overall block or a credit block.
Right now the systme allows me to create the production order with refernce to the sales order even when the sales order is blocked.
Is there any way by which this check can be activated.
Thanks
Ritesh

Hi!,
Please try follow:
Go to path IMG > Plant Maintenance and Customer Service > Master Data in Plant Maintenance and Customer Service > Technical Objects > Serial Number Management > Define Serial Number Profiles. There enter "2" in Stkck column for your serial profile.
Regards,
Uday

Third Party Sales Order in COPA - adjusted cost

We have a third party sales order which creates the Preq and then the pruchase order. We have statistical conditions on the purchase order. We have switched the billing relavency on the item category TAS to a B to allow billing before the invoice recipt from the oversees vendor. Billing block is on the order until inbound delivery is updated.
A purchase order is created with statistical conditions for an accrual amount (palletization charge). When the goods receipt is performed against an inbound delivery and the billing block is removed, a customer invoice is created and the correct value, cost plus the accrual amount, posts into the customer billing document vprs condition and posts accordingly to co-pa.
The issue is that when the invoice receipt is performed against the purchase order, the normal FI document is created against the vendor and gr/ir account. However, at this time an adjustment to the vprs is posted against the original billing document vprs condition for the statistical condition on the purchase order. This adjustment to the vprs condition then creates a copa document which reduces the cost of goods sold value field.
Any ideas on how to prevent this adjustment to the co-pa cogs value?

Hi,
Process
VA01 - Create sales order (Schedule line CS and item category TAS) >> ME52N - PR is generated after save of sales order >> ME21N - Convert PR in to P.O >> Then vendor will send goods to customer and will send invoice to our company >> MIRO - Invoice receipt from vendor >> VF01 - Final invoice to customer
When you enter vendor invoice then you come to know that vendor sent qty. same will be billed to customer(Billing relevance in item category should be F)
Kapil

Settlement for sales order TAB item

Hi Experts,
1. Is that only when the sales order item status change from " Not invoiced " to Invoiced ", the settlement can be performed ?
2. We have one sales order , which item category is TAB, we alreday GR for parts, GI for sales order, and invoiced to customer, when we run VA88, why there is no change on this item ?
Thanks and Regards
Shubin

when u invoiced, then run VA88 (settlement).
kapil

Incoming Sales Order to COPA

Hello,
If we activate Incoming Sales Order scenario in COPA, then it creates a COPA document when sales order is created or changed.
1. What happens when it is billed, does it creates one more COPA document with new record type F, and also retains the older one with record type A
2. Also we need to activate for a given SALES ORDER TYPE, which will be like 3-5% of total sales orders that will be created, if not, it will create COPA documents for all other SALES ORDER TYPES as well, when the order is created, which is not required, and will lead to huge redundancy in data...How can i achieve this?
Cheers
Balla

Hi Ajay,
your suggestion (BAPI_COPAACTUALS_POSTCOSTDATA,..) sounds interesting.
As per now, I never had the requirement to transfer "some" incoming sales orders to CO-PA and others not.
From my point of view due to the fact that the record type "A" posting never gets "reversed" if the sales order is billed or cancelled there is only limited additional value if the incoming sales order transfer to CO-PA is activated.
BR Christian

MTO - Settlement of Sales Order to COPA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for