Multiple Alternative ID 's dependent on Sales org

Hi,
Our CRM box is used by multiple countries and share the same product master. In addition to the Product ID each country has its own specific country code.
To achieve this, we have created multiple settypes and assigned to alternative ID's.
Now we dont know how to make these alternative ID's dependent on Sales org. eg: ZALT1 is for Sales org 10 and ZALT2 for Sales org 11.
Has anybody faced this requirement and able to find a solution.
Regards,
Shaik

HI
An alternative ID type can only be maintained in the header area of a product if it refers to a field from a single-line, organization-independent set type. As per my understanding I think Alt id is not supported for distribution dependent set types.
Hence during the step "Create UI Configuration for ID Type " there is an error.
Here is a workaround (without Alt ID)
Create distribution dependent set types.
follow steps to add distribution dependent set types to product:
http://sites.google.com/site/rupeshpatil/tweets/prddcconfig
Now you would need to enhance the product search component to search by these new fields.
Hope this helps
RP

Similar Messages

Creating Custom fields which are sales org dependent in Accounts Master

Hello Experts,
I want to create new custom fields in Accounts Master for sales and shipping.The component being used is BP_SALES.However when I try to create custom fields through AET, the new fields are added in the BUILHEADER context node.The problem with this is, its making the fields Sales Org independent.
I want to add the fields which are sales org dependent( i.e. want to add the fields for the context nodes BUILSHIPPINGTERMS and BUILSALESARRANGEMENT).
Please help me in this regards,
Thanks and Regards,
Rahim
Edited by: Abdul Rahim on Dec 27, 2010 9:55 AM

Hi Rahim,
in general extension fields for Business Partner are only supported for the header fields (Table BUT000). Therefore the AET does not offer this.
Table extension for BP sales data is supported by the AET beginning from CRM 7.0 eHP1. If you have this you can just create a 1:1 table enhancements and should be happy. If not I'm afraid that you would have to implement this manually.
Using the Easy Enhancement Workbench (EEW) it would only be possible to create table extensions for the header and for relation ship but not for sales data.
Regards Matthias

Assign Multiple Sales Org for One Plant in STO process

Hi Experts,
Aware that I can assign multiple sales org to 1 plant (relationship: many to many).
I am trying to create STOs to supplying plant and assigning them to different sales organization but encountered problem.
Example:
Supplying Plant 1000 - Sales Org 1000A (food) and 1000B (apparel)
Receiving Plant 1100
Plant 1100 wants to issue 2 STOs to Plant 1000 - 1 for each Sales Org (for instance STO1 to food division, and STO2 for apparel division).
However, when I tried creating STO in the system, noticed that in the shipping tab (item details) the sales org, DC has been assigned to 1 particular assignment and data is locked.
Tried to get into SPRO to configure and define the shipping data for plants but noticed that it's 1 to 1 relationship (SPRO - IMG - MM - PO - Set up Stock Transport Order - Define Shipping Data).
How can this be done?

You can set different sales areas (~sales organisation) for one plant in SAP - based on issuing SLoc provided STO between storage locations is activated.
SPRO > Materials Management > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up Stock Transport Order > Set Up Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations > Define Shipping Data for Stock Transfers Between Storage Locations
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jul 2, 2011 6:14 PM

BP im multiple sales org :BDoc BUPA_REL   error

IN CRM we have a sold-to BP maintained in two sales org 1000 and 2000 and its
                                 ship-to maintained only in 2000 sales org                                 in CRM system ( CRM 5.0 )
Those are replicated to ECC
(   I used FM BUPA_MWXT_CREATE_MAIN_BDOC to replicate BP to ECC ...
it worked fine ... sold-to created in 1000 and 2000 and ship-to are crated in 2000 sales org in ECC . )
Now I'm trying to replicate the BP relationship to ECC using FM 'BUPA_MWXT_CREATE_REL_BDOC'.
At this point BDOC BUPA_REL is giving error as
: Customer XXXXXX (SHIP-TO) has not been created for sales area 1000.
I know ship-to is not maintained in 1000 sales org ...but I want the relationship to be maintained for 2000 sales org .
How can I acheive this?
By using 'BUPA_MWXT_CREATE_REL_BDOC' I want to maintain relationship only for 2000 sales org.??
Let me know if you ar not clear wiht the question
Edited by: aday rao on Sep 16, 2009 11:13 PM
Edited by: aday rao on Sep 16, 2009 11:18 PM
Edited by: aday rao on Sep 17, 2009 9:40 PM
Edited by: aday rao on Nov 2, 2009 10:09 PM

In my case I was trying to create a sales rep manually and when I did that
no 'Personeel number' (BP- Employee Role -Identification Tab) was getting assigned to it, hence the error.
Check for the value in this field for the BP which is throwing the error.
Table - BUS000EMPL
Field - EMPLOYEE_ID
Reward point , if info helps.
Regards
Pallav

Alternative Free Good determination in Sales order

Dear Gurus,
We activated Free Goods determination. We are maintaining condition records in Tcode VBN1. We are creating the condition records using the fields Sales org, Distribution Channel and Sales Office. Condition record specifies the free good material and its quantity for main material with specified quantity. As of now, It is working fine and it is picking up the free good material correctly at Sales order if we create line item for main material.
As per the new requirement, if the free good material is not available in the stock, it should pick up other alternative free good material for the main material. Mean to say, we want to configure free good determination where we will specify two free good materials for one main material, then system will pick up one of the free good materials for main material in Sales order.
Ex: Main material : A
1st Free good material : F1
2nd Free good material : F2
If the stock for F1 free good material is not available then system should pick up F2 free good material automatically.
I have tried to map the another Free good material for main material in the same condition record, but system is not accepting to proceed further.
Kindly suggest what I need to do, what configuration is required. Please provide your valuable inputs.
Thanks
Chandra Mouli

FYI - Neel & Chandra Mouli
Substitution strategy in Material Substitution: Reason (TCode OVRQ ) controls whether product selection should occur automatically in the background or whether the alternative materials should be offered for selection in a dialog box. So, this product selection in the background is performed on the basis of the availability check.
The substitution reasons are entered in the master records for material determination.
Kindly test & share your feedback.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Creation of Sales org views for customers related to vendor

Hello All,
Can any body tell me is there any functional module which can be used to created the sales org views for customers related to vendors.
Regards
Srinivas

Hi Ravi,
the number of sales area possible would be 6 sales area,
yes you can of course use the common master data functionality
After creating the organizational structure and relevant master records you want to use as the masters, that is, in the distribution channels and divisions you are going to use as a reference, you can group distribution channels and divisions separately for master data (which combines customer master and material master records), group condition records, or both master data and condition records.
Letu2019s say you have a product range that is not different for the four different distribution channels you have (the channels could be telesales, retail, industry, and wholesale.) Neither is there a difference in the customersu2019 details when they purchase through one or the other. Thus, you will not want to create a multiple of four views of customer master and material master records. Merely create the customer master records and material master records in one of the distribution channels, such as retail. Then assign the other distribution channels you created in the organizational structure setup to this one.
Donu2019t forget this means you can only create or change master data in the distribution channel that is being referenced. In the scenario above, this means you can only change data for the retail distribution channel. Even if you should access a customer or material master in change mode, press F4 (possible entries), and select telesales, industry, or wholesale, you will receive a message u201CSales area is not defined . . . u201D
The same is true for the sharing of conditions. If conditions are shared, you need only create a condition in the distribution channel or division you are using as the reference. Obviously, this only pertains to conditions that have the distribution channel and/or division in their key, such as a price based on sales area
Revert if helpful
Mohit Singh

A Sales Document for a Particular Sales Org. should not appear in VF04

Hi SD Gurus,
Please guide me in this scenario.
There is a Sales Document type ZNEW, for which the billing type is ZA.
Requirement: -
1. XXXX Sales Org. wants to bill ZNEW. I mean they create ZA from ZNEW.
2. YYYY Sales Org. doesn't want to bill ZNEW. I mean they DON'T create ZA from ZNEW
2a. They don't want to see ZNEW orders in VF04.
2b. They don't want to exclude ZA from VF04.
Is there any other way in which we can achieve the above requirements ?
My Solution: -
1. Putting a Billing Block for YYYY ZNEW orders only using USER_EXIT. But the problem with this is ZNEW orders still shows up in VF04.
2. Putting a Reason for Rejection for all the line items in YYYY ZNEW orders using USER_EXIT. This time ZNEW won't show up in VF04. As there are some reports running for Reason for Rejection, the report looks big.
3. I tried manually making YYYY ZNEW order complete in VBUK and VBUP. Still it shows up in VF04.
Please let me know if you have any suggestions on this. Your response is really appreciated.

Dear Uday Kumar Narayanappa ,
I think as a consultant you have the say in deciding how the things should be mapped in SAP than the USER.
I dont find any reason other than having the same user id being shared between multiple users (and hence variant cannot be used).
Anyways try this.
Make a Z program copying VF04 .
Give the Tcode which is agreeable for the users.
In that Z program , write a code NOT TO CONSIDER documents of type ZNEW.
Now limit the authorisation of this new program only to those users who doesnt not want to deal with ZNEW.
Hope it helps.
Thanks & Regards,
Hegal K Charles

Sales Org. vs Territory

Hi all,
Currently, we are analyzing the advantages of having Sales Org. over Territory so that we can frame a meaningful Org. Structure in C4C.
One part of functional team wants to setup Territory as Org. Hierarchy with a belief that they can see all Analytics sorting based on Territory as you can see in the below Opportunity report.
Another part of functional team argues that org. Structure is inevitable but not able to give strong comments on why it is needed over Territory.
We are kind of stuck on taking a decision here. This is not an integration related reqt. for now but we are thinking that it may effect in future as we have C4C Opportunity --> ECC Quote replication which is planned in phase 2. Will it be a problem there if we go with Territory model?
I would like to know your opinion on this.
Opportunity Analysis
regards,
Srivatsava J

It depends on your requirements if you need territory management. I think using the sales orgs of the organisational structure is inevitable, adding territories might be overkill/confusing if you don't really need it. Note that you also need to define and maintain realignment rules (e.g. condition on postal code range) that determine the territory and owner. Also integration with ECC is a good point to consider.
We actually did implement territory management next to the org structure. They have pretty much the same setup, so no problems there. We had extended requirements concerning account management; in our case the account manager (based on postal codes) is not the same as the employee responsible for sales. Territory management could meet our requirements and we also report on territory ID. I think from 1405 release there should be a new data source for territory management, so that should not be a problem (anymore..).

: Colon in Sales Org Field. ECC6

Dear experts,
I am updating some of our roles with correct org levels. I noticed in the sales org field of one of them there is a : in place. Can you tell me if there is a reason for this? I understand the ' ' but I have never come across a colon before that wasn't related to BI queries.
I would like to remove it if its not supposed to be there so I have clean roles so to speak!
Any replies appreciated.
Dawn
I have also noticed this in the customer field. Its under controlling ZCO_REP03
Edited by: Nicnac on Feb 19, 2010 12:47 PM

> I have also noticed this in the customer field. Its under controlling ZCO_REP03
Hokai! I would be carefull!
Is this really an authorization object or a role name?
I suspect that what the BW folks might have done is to tap into the ECC roles to reuse authorization data for their reporting authorizations. If they wantes to achieve this for all org fields from ECC and also provide the aggregation values as required (because the users and possibly re-usable roles already exist) then they might be maintaining this authorization (which appears to be useless) in the ECC system so that their extractors can extract the role data as well!!
I would go to the BW folks and check on that side first before changing anything.
There are several advantages from this approach, but it does create a dependency between the ERP system and the BW system which is not easily "visible" on the ECC side.
If they are not available, then I will show you some tricks to some of the hints you can find yourself (if this is the case). Let me know.
Actually, I am feeling lucky today so I will bet my hat on it that it is a BW extraction...
Cheers,
Julius

Sales Org. structure reallignment

First thanks for taking the time to read this post. I would like to have your expert suggestions for the below scenario.
In our client organization, a country is mapped as sales org in SAP, different product lines are captured in the sales division level, the country is divided into mutiple sales districts and it is captured as sales office in SAP, district is further sub-divided into mutiple territories and it is captured as sales group in the system. Customers will be created at the bottom of the sales structure.
The business is highly dynamic and they would do geographical reallignment every year. For eg, To start with, we may have created 8 different sales offices in the system. But it could be reduced (for eg. 6) or increasted (for eg. 10) in the next year depending on the market situation. The same could happen with the sales group also. So the underlying customers need to updated with new sales office and sales group. How can we do it easily considering the master record volume (approx. 200,000). How will it impact other areas like demand planning, allocation, pricing, commission and etc. Is there any alternate approach to handle it differently?

Hi,
Sales pricing, commission will be effected in case you sales office and sales group will be part of it, you need to input the condition record for the same to caluculate the pricing and commission.
Since this is your business requirements, you have to go with it, and later you need to maintained the condition record as required.
For demand planning is based upon creation of sales order, i don't it will impact mutch in it.
regards
Vivek.

Creation of Sales org and company code

Hello Folks,
Am i right to say that sales org is assigned to company code but the creation of sales org is not dependent on the existence of the company code is will be assigned to?
regards
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
You are right. You can create either company code first or sales organisation first. You can first create everything you need (sales organisation, plant, d.channel, division, company code, credit control area....anything) in any order, the order really doesnt matter here.
Once you start assigning,, the assignment elements shoudl be there. Thats all. If the assignment elements are there, you can assign them, as long as they are there in the system.

Maintain condition records in one sales org,applicabe to all sales orgs

Hi SD gurus,
I have two sales organisations say for example3000 & 4000. Instead of maintaining pricing condition records in both the sales organisation for customers, materials, I want to maintain them for only one sales org 3000.I dont want to maintain them for sales org 4000. The same condition records should be determined in the sales order created for sales org 4000, what ever maintained in sales org 3000.
To summarise, Instead of maintaining pricing for both sales org, i need to maintain it in one sales org but should be applible to all the orders created in both the sales orgs. This will reduce the duplication of work.
Do we have any customizing setting in SD or do we need to go for enhancement? How?
Regards,
Srini

Hi Srinivas K,
In SAP,We have a concept called Common Distribution Channel(VOR1) and Common Division(VOR2).The Purpose of this Option is to avoid the Creating Master Data for all Distribution Channels and Divisions,Like Customer Master Records,as you mentioned Price condition(Condition Master Record).
In brief.....if you are dealing with multiple Distribution Channels Like 01,02,03,04....Now for example if customer belongs to all these Distribution Channel,we need to create Xd01 4 times for the same Customer with different Channels and even with Material Master Record also....and even think the same with Pricing Condition Also....Now to avoid Creating the Master Records in Each Distribution Channels..we can Define Common Distribution Channel Like 00.
Now if you create the CMR or MMR or Pricing Conditions for 00.then default all these will be applicable with other Channels Like 01,02,03,04.
The same case with Divisions also,but if you define common Divisions...This will be applicable only for Customer Master Record and Pricing Records only....Common Divisions are not applicable for Material Master Record.
In the of Sales Organization point of you...there is no such provison of Common Sales Organization.
we need to Maintain individualy for Sales Organizations....for Pricing you can Copy and create Records...But what you are asking is not possible...
Hope you Understood....
Regards,
Damu

Org unit and a sales Org

Hello,
Does any Org unit must be assigend to a sale Org and why
thanks,
Iris

Hi Iris,
Organizational Units form the basis of an organizational plan, Organizational units are functional units of a company. Depending on how a company is organized, organizational units can consist of departments, groups or project teams.
There are three different areas basically in SAP CRM Sales, Marketing and Service. An org unit can be assigned to different areas, for example an organization unit can be a sales organization in the Sales Scenario and service org in the service scenario.If your organization wants to be a sales organization, then you need to maintain the same on the Function tab of the org model. All the attributes relevant to the same, can also be maintained in the attributes tab page.
Hope this was useful to you.
regards
Srikantan

BP not Valid for Sales Org - Web Client error

Hi,
We are currently upgrading from CRM 4.0 --> 2007. We have multiple Sales Organisations and different business roles. In the Web Clients we have a number of transactions. When we try and add additional users from other sales orgs to these activities/transactions we get the following error "BP not Valid for Sales Org".
In CRM 4.0 for the various Interaction Centers we never got this error. We were able to add additional users from other sales orgs to transactions.
Mt question is - How can we stop this error from occuring , so that we can add additional users from other sales orgs to these activities/transactions in the various Web Clients.
Any help on this would be greatly appreciated,
Thanks,
Dan

Hi,
This error is appearing for the addition of employees. These employees are set up in the Org model for the relevant Sales Org's, yet the error still appears.
How would you go about adding employees,contacts etc from different Sales Org's to transactions (i.e attendees for an audit) in a Web Client that is set up to be Sales Org specific.
Regards,
Dan

Place one order with Products from different sales orgs

Hello,
We are in CRM 7.0 EHP2 connected to ECC 6.0. We have Internet
sales/Webchannel Application.
We are rolling out Internet sales for a new country but they want the option to
place one single order with products from different sales
organizations.
Currently Customers send fax/email to customer
representative(CR) with list of products. The CR identifies and places
multiple orders if products belong to different sales orgs.
Currently customers don't have idea about sales orgs and they don't
have a clue which product belongs to which sales orgs. So, for them to
use Internet sales, we have to provide them an option to place one
order with products from different sales orgs.
I understand SAP doesn't support this. But, is there any way we can achieve this through some custom/out of the box solutions?
Thanks,
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
Please have a below help link, it may help you to explain the role of Distribution Channel and if it fits to your requirement.
Organizational Data Determination in CRM E-Commerce - E-Commerce - SAP Library
Thanks,
Hamendra

Multiple Alternative ID 's dependent on Sales org

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for