Need to clarify why some clearing accounting documents without no line item
Hi All,
there are few clearing accounting documents created. In that for very few documents are generated without line item.
could you anyone tell me what might me the reason?
waiting for your reply,
Regards
Hi Chintan,
Thanks for your reply. there are some other clearing documents where i can execute it through FB03. but there are only 3 documents which are not appering in fb03. it says list contains no data. can you please tel me what might me the reason.
Regards
Similar Messages
-
Posted Accounting documents not showing line items
Hi!
I facing a problem that has been created during the posting of accounting documents.
The Problem:
A Number of accounting documents were posted but there are no entries for them in BSIS, where as the header exists in BKPF and the detail exists in BSEG. So although it is showing the document as posted. It is not reporting it against the relevant G/L Account. Since cheques have already been issued against these documents, we are trying to avoid a reversal of these documents.
Our Analysis of the problem
We think that the problem has arose due to an error in the master data of G/L Account.
Some new G/L Accounts were created and the person creating it forgot to check the 'Line Item Display' Check in fs00->Control Data Tab.
New Documents were meanwhile created with line items using these G/L Accounts and were then posted.
When the mistake was realized the 'Line item Display' was checked for these Accounts. This however occured after the documents were posted.Ashan,
1) entries come only in BSIS/BSAS when Field "Indicator: Open Item Management" = X (SKB1-XOPVW)
2) For line item display, the system stores an entry per line item in an index table which contains the link between line item and account.
-> I think you've to run a "correction-program" but
plz only in agreement with SAP (OSS)
Andreas -
Unable to cancel Billing due to cleared accounting document for Free Goods
Hi,
I have a case as described below:
I. SALES ORDER CREATION
Transaction VA01 à Sales order is created for the following details:
1. Material Normal (TAN) : 100 CAR
2. Free Goods (TANN) : 10 CAR
II. Subsequent processing of sales order
a. Delivery(1) and Billing (1) creation for the SO with the following details :
Material Normal (TAN) : 100 CAR
Free Goods (TANN) : 5 CAR
Status of accounting document after releasing billing document to Accounting: Not cleared
Accounting Journal:
A/R xxxx
Sales discount xxxx
General Domestic Sales xxxx
VAT u2013 Out(TAX) xxxx
b. Delivery (2) and Billing (2) is then being made for the leftover item of the Sales Order:
Free Goods (TANN) = 5 CAR
Status of Accounting document after releasing billing document to Accounting: CLEARED
Accounting Journal
Dr. Sales Discount xxxx
Cr. General Domestic Sales xxxx
III. Reversal of Billing (2) needs to be done
Activities conducted:
a. Go to VF11 and enter Billing (2) document number
b. Execute!
System response:
Error Log:
1) Data inconsistency during processing of document xxxxxxx
2) The Billing Document xxxxxxx is already cleared
From the error found, we tried to reverse the cleared accounting document by using t-code FBRA:
System response:
Document xxxxxx IS NOT a clearing document
Question:
We have to reverse the clearing document first in order to cancel the related billing document but we keep finding this error, do Anyone have any advice to solve this issue?
We have simulated similar transaction in IDES and no problem is found, is there any specific setting in customizing that can allow cancellation of billing document regardless of its accounting document status (Cleared or Not Cleared) ?
Thanks in Advance,
IndroThanks a lot for the reply,
It answers my question, I found the copying requirement using routine 029 was defined in the cancellation document section of the Billing type to be cancelled
After removing, the billing document can be cancelled
Thanks,
Indro -
Why an Additional Accounting document created after cancellation?
Dear Experts,
The sales order item was Invoiced using VF01 and excise invoice generated which had two accounting document created.
When we cancelled through VF11 we have now 3 accounting document instead of two. When checked the above two mentioned doc were additional and showing executed from J1IH but we have not passed any entry in this Tcode. They have already cancelled excise invoice so why this additional accounting document are showing for this line item.
Is there someway to reverse this somehow? Why this additional accounting document? (Attached doc flow)
Many Thanks ,Dear Deepak
We can see Two accounting documents at the the time of VF01--one for excise entries and another for normal accounting(this is happening in my current client)
Let me give an example-- if sales order having the value of total 1000Rs with Excise values 103Rs(10+2+1) and some sales tax--55Rs(5%)
Then at the time of VF01 --one accounting document (Example--AC1)shows as:
Customer account Dr 1158 Rs
Domestic sales revenue account Cr 1000Rs
Cenvat Suspense account Cr 103Rs
Sales tax Cr 55Rs
The another accounting document will be created automatically--due to background excise invoice generation--which contains only excise entries:(AC-Excise)
CENVAT suspense account Dr--103Rs
CENVAT BED payable Cr--100Rs
CENVAT CESS payable Cr--2 Rs
CENVAT SH.Cess payable Cr-1Rs...
Note: some times there is repeated creation of AC1(AC2,AC3 etc...) with same amounts due to some updation related errors(unfortunately we are unable to reproduce this due to--this was happening as and when)
Note: I have checked the accounting document creation time for the repeated accounting documents--all are showing with same time with same user name.
I think this was happened in your case-(i may be wrong here)
So please check--the creation time of accounting and update us..
Phanikumar -
Hi.i really need to know why some iphone 5s lose wi-fi or bluetooth comminucations after a while?!? i just charged it with my iphone 4's adapter,it can be the reason?!?!?!?! i dont think so....
It would help to have more details about when your phone loses wi-fi or bluetooth.
When an iPhone locks itself it turns Wi-fi off. I haven't had any problems with bluetooth turning off.
You might try restarting the phone. Double tap the home button to open the multitasking drawer, tap and hold on any icon in the drawer until the icons start to jiggle, tap the X that appears on the upper corner of each icon to shut them all down. Press the Home button to close the drawer. Then hold the sleep/wake button down and wait for the Slide to Power Off slider appears. Slide it and wait for the phone to shut down. Wait a few seconds and then press and hold the sleep/wake button again until the Apple logo appears and the phone restarts.
You can also reset your network settings, go to Settings => General => Reset Network Settings. You will have to reconnect and enter passwords for any wi-fi networks that you normally connect to after you do this.
Let us know if this doesn't help. -
Getting all documents(and their line items) on basis of a vendor r customer
Hello to all,
I have made a report which takes a range of document dates and querys the bkpf on the basis of bldat(and query bseg on basis of the retrieved belnr). Now want i need is to add another selection(lifnr in case of vendor and kunnr in case of customer) so that if i want to see a particular vendor or customer, i can see only those record(line items).
i tried querying the bseg on basis of lifnr , but i get only those line items (vendor line item or customer line items)
i want all the line items..
How to do it ?
Help needed..Thanks..
ShehryarHey,
Accounting document data is stored in the below tables:
BKPF - Header
BSEG - Line Item: GL/Customer/Vendor
BSID/BSAD - Open/Cleared Customer Items
BSIK/BSAK - Open/Cleared Vendor Items
BSIS/BSAS - Open/Cleared GL Items
Follow the logic below:
For Vendors:
Select (BELNR) data from BKPF based on BLDAT
Select data from BSIK and BSAK where BELNR = (BELNR in Step 1) and LIFNR = (User Input)
Select data from BSIS and BSAS where BELNR = (BELNR in Step 2)
For Customers:
Select (BELNR) data from BKPF based on BLDAT
Select data from BSID and BSAD where BELNR = (BELNR in Step 1) and LIFNR = (User Input)
Select data from BSIS and BSAS where BELNR = (BELNR in Step 2)
-Kiran
*Please reward useful answers -
Mass clearing of inter company open line items
Hi all,
we are trying to do a mass clearing ig inter company open line items and wanted to setup a program in SAP to expedite the process. Currently we are using F-03 to manually clear the open line items. We wanted to make things simple where we could simply give SAP a set of parameters so it will know what to clear and where to offset.
Do u have any idea what they need ?
please advise.
thanks.
BabaHi
Have you tried by changing the Base line date while cleaing the vendor account. ?
Satish -
How to create matreial document for ten line items (10 documents) by BAPI
Hi
how to create matreial document for ten line items (10 documents) by BAPI_goodsmvt_create
i created but it gives error as "no ites were transferre
and i need code also.
thanks in advancePrabhu Peram wrote:>
> >
Gareth @ Atos Origin UK wrote:
> > Prabhu,
> >
> > You have been on SDN a long time and have a decent amount of points - why do you feel the need to simply cut and paste standard SAP documentation? _-----> I least bother abt the Points, and i never ask somebody to give points to me , if u have any doubt on it , u can check all my postings ? All it does is fill up the SDN servers with replicated data which the original poster could quite easily access themselves via SE37----> Sorry I have seen ur Posting/Reply,dont assume that i do copy & paste for sake of Points.Njoy SAP.>
> > Gareth.
>
>
>
> regards
> Prabhu
Prabhu.
I didn't question you about points at all - I was making the point that you have been on SDN a long time and have a lot of points. Therefore you should know better than to simply cut and paste standard SAP help. If you don't copy and paste for sake of points, what do you do it for? It serves no purpose other than to fill up the servers here on SDN. The original poster appears to have access to a SAP system and SE37 and wants to know how to call a BAPI - they can easily go to SE37 and read the documentation themselves. Posting it here just adds noise and makes searching harder, as well as taking up more and more space on SDN servers.
Gareth. -
Service PO - Multiple account assignments for service line items
Hi All,
I'm trying to create a service purchase order using BAPI 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'.
But i need to create service line items with multiple account assignments say
For line item 10 -
1)Service line 1 -Cost center 'XYZ'.
2)Service line 2 -Cost center 'ABC'.
In POACCOUNT there is no option to specify the service line item .
Moreover in POSERVICES also there is no option to mention costcenter.
How can i create the same...
Thanks in advance
Regards
PrasanthiDear Prithviraj,
CAPEX (Category 'A'), can it apply to OPEX/Blanket and Sm. Proj?
I know create multiple account assigment under ME51N/ME52N.
Any solution by using FM (BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE and BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE)?
thanks
Regards,
Weng -
Tcode to create single delivery document for all line items in PO
Hi all,
Sorry if it is a simple question, But I am from SD module. What is Tcode to create a single delivery documents for all line items in PO. I have 3 line items with Different materials having diffent quantities and there are different delivery dates and different delivery schedule dates. I need to create single delivery. Could you please tell me how to do it? What is the Tcode?
Thanks
AnilHi,
Inbound delivery T.code VL31N.
Regards,
JS -
XML shows multiple po distributions account for each po line item
Hi, We have custome RDF created for Purchase Order Detail Report. Per the PO summary report, PO nubmer 30367 has two lines and each on has single distributions. Each line has different distributions. Line 1distribution account: 01.000.105.65020.00000.00 and Line 2 distribution account: 01.000.000.15020.00000.00. However when I run the XML for PO summary report, each line items contains the two account distributions. How do you make it sho it only show the account distribution pertain to the each line?
**Please see xml below.**
- <LIST_G_COMPANY>
- <G_COMPANY>
<C_COMPANY>CTI US Ledger</C_COMPANY>
<C_ORGANIZATION_ID>83</C_ORGANIZATION_ID>
<GL_CURRENCY>USD</GL_CURRENCY>
<STRUCTURE_ACC>101</STRUCTURE_ACC>
<STRUCTURE_CAT>101</STRUCTURE_CAT>
<C_YES>Yes</C_YES>
<C_NO>No</C_NO>
<C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>1</C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>
<BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>0</BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>
- <LIST_G_HEADERS>
- <G_HEADERS>
<POH_REMARKS />
<CREATION_DATE>01-SEP-10</CREATION_DATE>
<STATUS>Approved</STATUS>
<REV>0</REV>
<PRINTED_DATE />
<TYPE>Standard Purchase Order</TYPE>
<BUYER>BUNTING, DOUGLAS</BUYER>
<C_CURRENCY>USD</C_CURRENCY>
<VENDOR>Softchoice Corporation</VENDOR>
<ACCEPTANCE_DATE />
<ON_HOLD />
<VENDOR_SITE>SOFTCHOICE - PO</VENDOR_SITE>
<ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>No</ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR>
<PO_HEADER_ID1>2790</PO_HEADER_ID1>
<REVISED_DATE />
<PO_NUMBER>30367</PO_NUMBER>
<C_FND_PRECISION>2</C_FND_PRECISION>
- <LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
- <G_BREAK_LINES>
<LINE>1</LINE>
<LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
<REV1 />
<ITEM_DESCRIPTION>Test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
<UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
<PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
<UNIT_PRICE>500</UNIT_PRICE>
- <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <G_SHIPMENTS>
<CLOSED_CODE />
<LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
<LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
<NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
<NEED_BY_DATE />
<PROMISED_DATE />
<SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
<C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
<C_FLEX_ITEM />
</G_SHIPMENTS>
</LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
</LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
<C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
</G_BREAK_LINES>
- <G_BREAK_LINES>
<LINE>2</LINE>
<LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
<REV1 />
<ITEM_DESCRIPTION>test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
<UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
<PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
<UNIT_PRICE>1000</UNIT_PRICE>
- <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <G_SHIPMENTS>
<CLOSED_CODE />
<LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
<LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
<NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
<NEED_BY_DATE />
<PROMISED_DATE />
<SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
<C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
<C_FLEX_ITEM />
</G_SHIPMENTS>
</LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
</LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
<C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
</G_BREAK_LINES>
</LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>2,500.00</C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>
</G_HEADERS>
</LIST_G_HEADERS>
</G_COMPANY>
</LIST_G_COMPANY>
<XCOMPANY_NAME>CTI US Ledger</XCOMPANY_NAME>
<YES>Yes</YES>
<NO>No</NO>
<ORG_ID>83</ORG_ID>
<CAT_ID>1</CAT_ID>
<COUNT_RECORDS>1</COUNT_RECORDS>
</XXCTI_POXPOSTD_1>
**Here is the Query for the RDF file...**
SELECT pol.line_num Line
, pol.closed_flag Line_Closed
, pol.cancel_flag Line_Cancel
, pol.closed_code
, plt.line_type Line_Type
, &P_FLEX_CAT C_FLEX_CAT
, &P_FLEX_ITEM C_FLEX_ITEM
, pol.item_revision Rev
, pol.item_description Item_Description
, pol.unit_meas_lookup_code Unit
, pol.note_to_vendor Note_to_Vendor
/* Bug: 141118 Take unit price from PO_LINES if there is no shipment */
, to_number(decode(plt.order_type_lookup_code,
'AMOUNT',null,
nvl(pll.price_override,pol.unit_price))) Unit_Price
, hrl.location_code Ship_To_Location
, pll.promised_date Promised_Date
, pll.need_by_date Need_By_Date
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Ordered
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Received
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Cancelled
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
- NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
- NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)),
:p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Due
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Billed
, pol.po_header_id
FROM po_line_locations pll
, mtl_system_items msi
, mtl_categories mca
, po_lines pol
, po_line_types plt
, hr_locations hrl
WHERE
ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) > 0
AND (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount), NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)),:p_qty_precision)) > (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision))
AND pol.item_id = msi.inventory_item_id(+)
AND nvl(msi.organization_id,:c_organization_id) = :c_organization_id
AND pol.line_type_id = plt.line_type_id
AND pol.category_id = mca.category_id
/* Bug No 141118
Added the outer join on po_line_id ,hrl.location_id and nvl on the shipment_type
Also added nvl on quantity and price so as to select quantity and price if the PO
has no shipments */
AND pol.po_line_id = pll.po_line_id(+)
AND pll.ship_to_location_id = hrl.location_id(+)
AND pll.shipment_type in ('STANDARD', 'PLANNED')
AND &P_WHERE_CAT
AND &P_WHERE_ITEM
ORDER BY pol.line_num> I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
> Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
> I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process. -
Create new billing document if delivery line items have different UOM
Hello,
I have a requirement to create different billing documents if the line items in my delivery has different UOM.In my case if delivery is completely ok billing documents are automatically generated.
How to do so what logic needs to be build.Please guide.
Regards,Hi
Answer is pure assumption
You can try to implement VOFM Routine
Data transfer -> Billing documents
Check the Routine 351, you can copy the same and modify as per your requirement.
I think you need to modify VBRK-ZUKRI field, during creation of Billing document.
I suggest to take help from Functional consultant on this
Regards
Madhan D -
GR can not printed for PO-Multiple account assignment on single line item ,
Hi!
I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
Can you please let me have the solution ?
Thank snd regards,
Suranjana> I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
> Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
> I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process. -
How to identify Parked and Posted Documents in GL Line Item Report
Is there any way to identify parked and posted documents in GL Line Item Report S_ALR_87012282? If i tick the parked documents in the further selection tab in the selection parameter, report will list all documents (parked and posted).
There is no available field in the layout. Is there any other way?
Thanks!HI,
The other way to know the parked document details
use tcode: FBV3 - Display
OR
you can go to SE16 and enter table name VBKPF -Document Header for Document Parking
BSTAT = V
V = parked document
and ececute u will get the details of parked document.
Edited by: Manohar Mathkunti on Sep 13, 2008 11:11 AM -
How to restrict separate payment document for each line item in APP
HI Experts
PLs let me know how to restrict separate payment document for each line item in APP
Thanks
Sneha
Edited by: Sneha R on Apr 14, 2009 4:18 PMSneha,
If your query was to group items for payment ,in FBZP co code data for payment method there are 2 options 1.group payment for marked items 2.payment per due date.
Also in the Vendor master there is a flag which will ensure that each item is paid individually,if this is what you were looking for ( FK02 change vendor).
In case you want to group items to be paid together Payment Grouping Key can be assigned in Vendor Master .
Shony
Maybe you are looking for
-
Outbound delivery date in June and customer invoice post in July,tax rate?
Hi Experts tax rate (June)=22% tax rate (july)=24% issue is Outbound delivery date in June and customer invoice post in July,so sytem taking tax rate =24% instead of 22%.Because outbound delivery is happened in June. Please let me know that, 1)how sy
-
Oracle SQL not working in Apex
I have been given the following SQL statement by a supposed SQL DBA SELECT TOP 250 TRANS_CODE, TRANS_CASH_IN, Month([TRANS_DATE]) AS Transmonth, TRANS_COMMENT, TRANS_MACHINE_NO FROM TRANSACT WHERE (((Month([TRANS_DATE]))=Month(Now())) AND ((TRANS_COM
-
Hi everyone, Just a new thread to share with you how I did reset iTunes Match, this can be useful in some cases, like mine was. This allow you to sync again your entire iTunes library with iTunes Match like if it was the very first time you activate
-
Why does iPhone 4 take long time when finishing syncing?
I have recently started noticing, after upgrading to 7.0.3 that my iphone doesn't work as well, crashes occur in apps and it's a lot slower to process. Then I went to back-up my iphone, to my Macbook Pro, as I always do and have recently done since u
-
Actionlist is missing error with Reader 9.4 on Win2008
Hi All, The 3rd party SW that I need to install requires Reader 8 or 9 as a pre-requisite. I need the UK option. I can download fine from adobe.com/reader/download/otherversions (they certainly hide the older versions well). However when I run the