New checking rule

Hello SAP Gurus,
I have requirement of Availability check .  In STO between 2 plants with del & Billing the system should check for  availability of stock.
1.The supplying plant should have more than>75% of safety stock.
2.  The unrestricted stock should confirm more than 50% of PO quantity.
A new checking rule has to be developed.

Solved... Thank you.

Similar Messages

  • ATP Checking Rule - stock transport sch. agmnt

    Hi friends,
    i created a New checking rule (ZB) in <b>/NOMGP</b> - stock transfer sch. agmnt. for inter company stock transfer. i attached it with a checking group(Z0) and made scope of check. And assigned with doc type LU, supplying plant, delivery type NLCC & checking rule (ZB). the Z0 checking group is assigned in mat master in sales org/plant view.
    After creating delivery (VL10*) , in dlv i am getting Checking rule as "B". so i am not getting the ATP checks as per Z0-ZB setting. (checking group is coming correctly from mat master).
    <b>Can I get the checking rule ZB ??? in Delivery (environment -->availability )</b>
    thanks in advance
    maity

    Hi,
    just maintain the same cheking group in mrp3 view of materailmaster also
    and then try
    hope it helps
    reward if useful
    rohit

  • ATP - Checking Rule

    Hi friends,
    i created a New checking rule (ZB) in <b>/NOMGP</b> - stock transfer sch. agmnt. for inter company stock transfer. i attached it with a checking group(Z0) and made scope of check. And assigned with doc type LU, supplying plant, delivery type NLCC & checking rule (ZB). the Z0 checking group is assigned in mat master in sales org/plant view.
    After creating delivery (VL10*) , in dlv i am getting Checking rule as "B". so i am not getting the ATP checks as per Z0-ZB setting. (checking group is coming correctly from mat master).
    <b>Can I get the checking rule ZB ??? in Delivery (environment -->availability )</b>

    Hi,
    just maintain the same cheking group in mrp3 view of materailmaster also
    and then try
    hope it helps
    reward if useful
    rohit

  • Config to select Checking Rule "A" during Sales order availability check

    Hi All,
    Please can you tell me the config that tells system to select the checking rule "A" during sales order availability check. The problem at my client side is that the system was using the checking rule "A" initially but suddenly it has started using checking rule "B" (delivery) for sales order. The item category being used in YAN and Scheduline Line category is YC (ATP and Allocation allowed).
    The checking group is getting picked up correctly from the Material Master value.
    I have tried to find all the possible config that might be causing this issue, but I am unable to find one. Based on my understanding of the SAP SD process, there is no place where we can define in system to use the "checking rule" for SD availability check. This is the default (hard-coded) in the system.
    Please can you help me to find how the checking rule "B" might be getting called instead of "A".
    Regards,
    Swapnil

    Hi
    Checking rule is transaction based like A for SD sales order and B for SD delivery like that it is defined
    So in a sales order the system checks with the combination of AChecking rule and the Checking group defined in MMR and for that combination we give controls in OVZ9 and based on that system makes availability check
    Every one  and all SAP materials including myself say Checking Rule is transaction based and picked up by the system thro hard coded controls
    But In t code OPJL it is possible to define new checking rules that means customization is possible
    But where is the link or assignment
    For this nobody has given correct answers including the PP friends
    For you the system is shifting the Checking Rule from A to B in the sales order itself means we can find out get where the said assignment is done
    In OVZ9 remove the combination Checking rule B and your Checking group and save
    You said the system has shifted its  Checking rule to B from A
    Now test it after removing this control in OVZ9 and see the system is shifting once again to A or throwing error as the control is removed in OVZ9
    make sure that you do this in a sales order and post back
    Regards
    Raja

  • How Can I Create a New Check In Page?

    Hello,
    I'm trying to create a new check in page using hcst or jsp but i can´t find the place to put it... or to customized it... and I don´t know where to find the files for it.
    Thanks,
    Rui Santos

    As was already mentioned there is the rules/profiles through configuration applet, but if you want to use a custom HCSF, HCST, JSP, etc., and then add it to the menu you will need a component that makes use of the navBuilder JavaScript API.
    Then you add a resource file to your component and add something like this to that resource:
              <@dynamichtml custom_finish_layout_init@>
                   <$include super.custom_finish_layout_init$>
                   navBuilder.addChildNodeTo
                        'ADMINISTRATION',
                        'item',
                        'id==FileStorePathFinder',
                        'label==File Store Path Finder',
                        'url==' + httpCgiPath +'?IdcService=FILE_STORE_TEST'
              <@end@>
    For this example, we are actually adding a menu item to the Administration menu, but all the menus can be manipulated like htis.

  • Developer: web inspector how do I add new css rules

    I have been using web inspector for quite some time. It was a regular part of my development workflow, however, I was surprised when the safari team totally re-vamped the tool in safari 6.
    You use to be able to click on the menu in the styling section of the tool bar and click "Add new rule". Now it appears you can no longer add css rules in this way. Which is a bummer because I used this feature all the time.
    You also, use to be able to double click for a new rule when in the actual stylesheet under the Resources tab. I can no longer do this either. For the life of me, I can't figure out why the safari team would get rid of these valuable options.
    Someone please help.
    These options must still exist, as they are invaluable when working with css in the browser. Does anyone know how to add a new style rule. I read the documentation and I don't see anything about removing this functionality.
    The only way I can find to add a new rule, is through the snippet bar, which is kind of a pain as you have to add the <style> tags every time you add a new rule.
    Also, I can't figure out how to view and elements pseudo classes (i.e. :hover , :checked, etc).
    I have to say, it is a little frustrating as I don't clearly see the benefits of their redesign and it just seems harder to use. It kind of feels like they reskinned and rearranged things just to make it look new and didn't really think through how developers use this tool.
    Does anyone else feel this way with the new safari?
    Maybe I will see the light after a couple of days. I hope so because I am partial to using safari.

    Build your FGLayout prototype page so it works well in all screen sizes (mobile first, then tablet, finally desktop).    To create your home page, SaveAs index.html.   Then SaveAs page2.html, replace content.  Repeat for other site pages.
    Nancy O.

  • Java and ABAP system, setting new password rules

    Hello,
    we have a ecc 6.0 and in front for the users we have a portal based on netweaver 7.0. Our security colleagues told us, to change the password rules based on our new security book. the portal is getting the users via ume and the datasource is the abap system (ecc 6.0). All users accessing the form the portal to the backend system are communication users. my question now. there are two possiblities to change password rules settings. one in the java system and the other on the abap system. where should be implement the password rules? would the changes on the abap system also affect the java system?
    regards,
    alexander tuerk

    > we have a ecc 6.0 and in front for the users we have a portal based on netweaver 7.0. Our security colleagues told us, to change the password rules based on our new security book. the portal is getting the users via ume and the datasource is the abap system (ecc 6.0).
    For password rules please check the documentation: [Logon and Password Security in the SAP System|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/52/6717ed439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm]
    [Profile Parameters for Logon and Password (Login Parameters)|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/32/20709747d649e8bc74e084d0b2432c/frameset.htm]
    and the SAP Note: [Note 862989 - New password rules as of SAP NetWeaver 2004s (NW ABAP 7.0)|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/862989]
    [2467 - Password rules and preventing incorrect logons|https://service.sap.com/~form/handler?_APP=01100107900000000342&_EVENT=REDIR&_NNUM=0000002467&nlang=E]
    All users accessing the form the portal to the backend system are communication users. my question now. there are two possiblities to change password rules settings. one in the java system and the other on the abap system. where should be implement the password rules? would the changes on the abap system also affect the java system?
    Please go through the following Link: [Users and Passwords for AS JAVA|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/3d/addc3ed98f7650e10000000a114084/content.htm]
    Regards,
    Dipanjan

  • Order type Z031 plant AT01. No checking rule mantained for operation

    Hello PS Gurus,
    I am trying to create a new element PEP, and when i tried to release the element PEP i get.
    Order type Z031 plant AT01. No checking rule mantained for operation
    Can someone tell me what is missing in our customization?
                 Best Regards
                     João Fernandes

    I assume you are trying to attach materials to network activity which is assigned to WBS.
    Your error is because of missing configuration in below mentioned node:
    In SPRO maintain the 'Define Checking Control' under Project Systems->Material->Availability Check (T code OPJK)
    For plant AT01 and Order Type Z031 maintain parameters which are suitable to you. Before this you need to check the node OPJJ.
    Regards
    Sreenivas
    Pls close this post if satisfied.

  • Delivery check rule  B .

    have a small question.
    I created a new availability check ZB which I copied from B.
    Now where do I assign the check rule to the delivery document in the configuration.
    my question is How would the system know whether to pick B or ZB if I have both of them in the check rule. there should be some place where I assign ZB to delivery document to pick it up instead of B.
    Please dont reply that its not possible because if its not possibel sap will not provide an option to create a new check.
    Regards
    Deepu

    Hi,
    You have to assign the CHECKING RULE to the CHECKING GROUP of availability chcek
    This checking group is assigned to the  MATERIAL in Sales: General/Plant view
    After that you will assign the AVAILAILITY Check to the DELIVERY ITEM CATEGORIES.
    Please cehck it and revert if you want more info
    Thanks,
    santosh

  • Propagation of New Business Rule to already deployed EAR

    Hi,
    we have an EAR with 1 business rule in its DataSync deployed initially in prod. We have then added a new business rule to the datasync and propagated the same. It propagated successfully, but when we check in the portal data base, it showed the path like RuleSets\abc.rls instead of Rules\abc.rls which is how we created and wrote the code.
    Do we need to do anything else here. We have propagated the datasync items as a separate operation. Does deleting the whole datasync items entries from the database and redeployment is the only option.?
    Please help...

    Is it not the same post as this one ? Changes to business rules in EAS not reflecting in planning
    Cheers
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Applying new access rules fails.

    Netware 6.5 SP6 BM 3.9
    Ok, new problem. I am trying to add some new access rules to the list in a particular container. When I have defined the rule and click apply I get the following message - Unknown system error. This doesnt happen on the other container which already has rules defined in it. Are the rules from the higher level container being propogated down the tree as I assumed they would be ?
    ---treename 2 explicit deny rules for the whole company
    ------it This container to be exempt. cant add rule to allow all.
    ------helpdesk
    ------etc
    Another aside seems to be that even though "Enforce Access Rules" is always on sometimes the rules do not work and sometimes they do.
    Any help much appreciated.

    JeffSheehan,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://support.novell.com/ to search the knowledgebase and check the other support options available on that page under "Self Support" and "Support Programs".
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://support.novell.com/forums/

  • How to change checking rule in SD

    Hello Experts,
    I am new to SD. i want to change checking rule for sales order from A to B in customizing. Please let me know how to change checking rule for sales order.
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Sai

    Hi
    As per my knowledge you cant change the checking rule in the sales order  please find the belwo
    1.In Sales and Distribution, the checking rule is specified within the system and cannot be changed.To check the availability of a  material, you must enter a checking groupin the material master record (in the field Availability check)..
    2.Along with the checking group, the checking rule specifies the final procedure for checking.
    3. Check the setting in the below path
        SPRO-IMG-Sales and distribution-Basic functions-Availability check and transfer of requirements---Availability check
    Regards
    Damu

  • Availability checking rule for sales orders

    Hi experts,
    To meet our useru2019s requirement I have switched off the availability check at the schedule line category level. But when I created a sales order the AVC is still happening. Upon checking I have noticed the availability checking group as u201C02u201D and checking rule as u201CBu201D in sales order. To my understanding the checking rule should be u201CAu201D for all sales orders. Could you please advise as to why it is happening so?

    Hi,
    I have done as what suggested and I created a new sales order. Upon checking (Sales screen --} environment --} availability) the availability checking group is 02 and checking rule is B. Please note that for the other sales document types we have, the checking group is 02 and checking rule is A

  • Checking Rule to Order Types

    Hai,
    Can somebody let me know how the system automatically derives the Checking rule 'A' for Sales Orders. I would like to create new Availability Check Control based on the Checking Group / Checking Rule combination.
    Mine is not an APO system, simple ECC 6.0, so I can't use the 'Business Transaction' field in the Document Type's Avail Check.
    I don't want to choose 'A' as checking Rule for my Sales Order doc type.
    Regards,
    Maheshwaran. I

    Hi Maheshwaran,
    Availability check is carried out in different transactions like Sales order creation, delivery creation, Purchase order creation, goods issue and also in production order. The point to be noted here is everywhere the availability check is carried out using two basic elements.
    1. Checking rule
    2. Checking group
    Explanation
    Checking Rule
    Checking rule is transaction based, i.e. In STD SAP system, if you are creating the sales order, then it is A, if delivery then it is B, if you are creating/releasing production order, then it is PP. This is almost fixed. What is the use of this as a single element it does not have any meaning, but with checking group.
    Checking group
    Checking group is the one what you assign in material master at plant level, i.e. for different plant and for the same material or for same plant different material there can be a different checking group. This is assigned in material master in MRP3 view, as a signal element it may not have much meaning except that it may be used for checking at which level - group level or individual level and quantities confirmed in the availability check are to be locked or not.
    Combination of Checking rule and checking group will define the scope of check
    In scope of check you will be defining all control parameters in t-code OVZ9
    Checking group you have defined in MMR as 01 and system is checking with checking rule A as it is a sales order you have created
    Hence the system takes the said combination
    Checking rules are predefined in SAP.
    Checking Rule A for Sale Order and B for Delivery is pre defined in SAP and based on the availability check what you maintain in material master, checking rule will react in sale order.
    'A' refers to Sales Order and Availability check Rule determined in '01'.
    Regards

  • Outsorting Check(rule) help

    Hello Experts,
    A new outsorting check(rule) will need to be developed to check during a final billing procedure each contract/installation's number of service days in the billing period, if the number of service days exceeds the numeric value set in the configuration table than the billing document will be placed in the billing outsort list for verification.
    Please can someone explain me how work with the outsorting check is this a regular abap program or it needs to be created in somewhere else? How apply the check to the billing procedure once is done, please experts guide through this, thanks in advance.
    Regards, Norman Vargas

    See the help documentation of the following activity in configuration.
    SAP Utilities>Tools>System Modifications>User-Defined Enhancements for Billing>Define Check List for Billing
    Your function module should be named ISU_VAL_ZNO_OF_DAYS according to this documentation.
    The interface of the function module should be like this
    *"       IMPORTING
    *"             REFERENCE(X_TE327) LIKE  TE327 STRUCTURE  TE327
    *"       CHANGING
    *"             REFERENCE(XY_OBJ) TYPE  ISU2A_BILLING_DATA
    *"             REFERENCE(XY_OUTCNSO) LIKE  ERCHO-OUTCNSO
    *"       EXCEPTIONS
    *"              GENERAL_FAULT
    Edited by: Srinivas Adavi on Nov 4, 2009 5:59 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I get my i4 to show in the USB device section instead of storage device when trying 2 sync?

    I am trying to sync with iphone 4. I think I have found the problem. I can get my iPad to sync with my Vista computer just fine. My iPhone won't. It is showing up in under my device section under "storage devices" and not under "USB" like my iPad is.

  • Mac Mini doesn't see PC connected via AirPort

    I created a wireless network using the AirPort built into the Mac Mini. My PC laptop connects to this network, but I can't find the PC or any of its components from the Mac. I am new to AirPort so maybe I don't know where to look. However, it seems t

  • Resolution? Font size? X300

    I have just switched from a T42 to the X300 and am dismayed at the small print on the screen. The screens are the same width - 11.25 inches, but the X300 is only 7 inches tall vs.8.5 ins. for the T42. I feel like I need to buy a magnifier for the scr

  • Declaratively set the value of a bind parameter in a view query

    Can I declaratively set that I want the value of the bind parameter in the view query to be the value of a specific field in the current row of a specific iterator in my data bindings? Thanks :D

  • N97 mini not BT with anything

    OK i've just upgraded from N95 8gb to N97 mini. Great I thought I'll have no issues with paring and making calls with JVC car kit. Now my N95 worked perfectly with no dropped calls and it could stream audio and video to the JVC unit all day long with