Open Items exist.. Not possible to change parameters ??

Hi all,
I made some X account balance to zero. And now when I was trying to change the account as open item (prior not in open item mgmt), system says that 'Account balance is 0, but still open items exist. Change not possible'. What does that mean ?
Suresh

Hi,
Once transaction data is posted, GL Account cannot be made into an open item managed account. However, you can consider the following options:
1. GL Account Balance is ZERO: If the GL Account balance is ZERO, the GL Master record can be changed to Open Item managed Account or vice versa. But this will not change the transaction data already posted. Only future transaction data will be open item managed.
2. Until SAP version 4.0B SAP has provided a program to convert a GL Account to open item managed account after transaction data is posted (or vice versa). You can execute this program by blocking the GL Account and this will make the required changes in tables and also change GL Master record.
But this program is not available for execution in higher versions. Hence, you can copy the program into a Z Program and execute it. The name of the standard program is RFSEPA02.
Thanks
Murali.

Similar Messages

  • In system settings 15 item are not accessible, get the message: cannot open it, is not possible on intel based MAC. Items like security, i cloud user and groups network and more

    in system settings 15 item are not accessible, get the message: cannot open it, is not possible on intel based MAC. Items like security, iCloud user and groups network and more.
    Genius bar told me to erase the harddisk and install OSX Maverick again. This has not changed the problems with the system settings

    You need to Repartition the drive as One partition which will erase all data from it and then reinstall OS X. then with the initial setup system you chose the language on the first screen that comes up. That sets the language for the whole system.
    There is no other way of completely removing certain information created by a previous owner. this hold strue whether you are selling or give a Mac to someone.
    To do the repartitioning you need to use the Online Internet Recovery system, if the Mac came with Lion 10.7 or above, or from the original system reinstall discs that came with it when it was new.

  • Action not possible because change version exist

    Dear All,
    We are at SRM5.0- Extended Classic scenario and facing issues for changing some of the PO documents.
    When the buyers are trying to change the PO, error is getting populated as 'Action not possible because change version exist'. This error is not allowing us to change the PO.
    These POs are changed in the past and all the relevant changes are reflected to backend system with no issues. In other words Change Versions do exists for these POs. Flags for Change Version completion is also set and all historical versions can be seen but without change history.
    Additional information -
    1. No approval workflows are implemented for PO.
    2. No locks are active for these documents.
    Appreciate your help!
    Regards,
    Sagar

    Hi Sagar and thanks for your response,
    well, actually the active change version won't be preserved in any case. It would be overwritten in the first scenario, and deleted in the second one. The reason why I'd like to have this "brute force" method is to face an eventual human error. Suppose that a disalignment between R3 and SRM has been created; my report basically "alligns" the SRM version to the corresponding R3 one. And suppose also that the user made a mistake so that the program must be used a second time. I'd like to provide a way to "UNDO" the first execution of the program, that is to say: i'd like to provide a way to OVERWRITE the actual active, change version, or alternatively delete the change version that the report did create the first time it has been launched.
    Hope it's a bit clearer now
    Thanks for any hint/suggestion you can give me
    EDIT: Oh, and please... can you provide me further information about your solution? I mean, use of that FM to unlock an active version of the PO and then the proper call to BBP_PD_PO_UPDATE specifying how you managed input params. Thanks a lot
    Edited by: Matteo Montalto on Apr 9, 2009 11:43 AM

  • SSFCOMPOSER - 154 - No output request open. End not possible.

    Hi Experts,
    I'm trying to print multiple smartforms using FMs SSF_OPEN and SSF_CLOSE. Inside the main program RBDAPP01 (Inbound processing for IDOCS) there is a loop at the IDOCS to be processed. Deep within the processing, we have a custom FM being called which prints smartforms. Since there is a loop at the calling main program, I have organized the code in the custom FM such that the first IDOC calls SSF_OPEN and the last IDOC calls SSF_CLOSE, so that all IDOCS in between will be able to print their smartforms. Here is the call stack:
    8
    SAPLZCUSTOM                   
    ZCUSTOMPROGRAM                             
    113
    FUNCTION                     
    ZCUSTOMPROGRAM                                         
    7
    SAPLPPC1                               
    ZCUSTOMPROGRAM     
    136
    FUNCTION                     
    KK2A_GET_DATA_FROM_IDOC                                     
    7
    SAPLPPC1                               
    LPPC1U01                               
    1
    FUNCTION                     
    KK2A_GET_DATA_FROM_IDOC                                     
    6
    SAPLBD20                               
    LBD20F0A                               
    454
    FORM                         
    IDOCS_PASS_TO_APPLICATION                                   
    5
    SAPLBD20                               
    LBD20F0B                               
    69
    FORM                         
    IDOCS_PROCESS                                               
    4
    SAPLBD20                               
    LBD20U05                               
    260
    FUNCTION                     
    IDOC_INPUT                                                  
    3
    SAPLEDIR                               
    LEDIRU02                               
    182
    FUNCTION                     
    IDOC_START_INBOUND                                          
    2
    SAPLBD12                               
    LBD12U04                               
    37
    FUNCTION                     
    APPLICATION_IDOC_POST_IMMEDIAT                              
    1
    RBDAPP01                               
    RBDAPP01                               
    388
    EVENT                        
    START-OF-SELECTION                                          
    The problem is:
    1. When I only have 1 IDOC being processed, SSF_OPEN and SSF_CLOSE happens in the custom FM at the same time. This creates a successful spool.
    2. Whereas, when I have 2 or more IDOCS, SSF_OPEN happens in the first IDOC, but then it goes back to the calling program, and then when the last IDOC is encountered SSF_CLOSE is called. The FM SSF_CLOSE in this scenario calls the exception INTERNAL_ERROR (sy-subrc = 2).
    The system message is SSFCOMPOSER - 154 - No output request open. End not possible.
    Why is this happening? Is it because that other programs (calling programs) may have affected the status of SSF_OPEN? It seems that the SSF_OPEN is no longer open.
    Thanks in Advanced,
    Jack

    No, it will not hold the smartform open, but you don't need to hold it open in order for printout to be accumulated in one spool. Spool system does the accumulation automatically, provided the spool requests that are to be added to an existing spool request are:
    - generated in the same transaction and
    - have the same attributes (such as user, title, output device, client from which the request was issued, number of copies, priority, cover sheet setting, archive mode, and ABAP session number).
    Important is: where do OUTPUT_OPTIONS like printer come from currently? Is print parameters popup displayed on first Idoc for user to choose printer and options? Or do you use USER_SETTINGS = 'X' to simply take over defaults from user master? If the print options dialog is displayed, it needs to be controlled as well so it's displayed only once.
    Assuming print options come from the user in dialog, the logic without explicit open/close could look somewhat like this:
    On first idoc:
    - call SSF_OPEN  importing  JOB_OUTPUT_OPTIONS to display print options dialog; move-corresponding JOB_OUTPUT_OPTIONS to global OUTPUT_OPTIONS;
    - set OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDNEWID = 'X' and clear  OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDFINAL, to ensure new spool will be started (overriding user choices for these parameters!);
    - if the user has set OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDIMMED = 'X' save it globally and clear it;
    - set CONTROL_PARAMETERS-NO_OPEN = 'X';
    On subsequent idoc:
    - clear OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDNEWID;
    - clear CONTROL_PARAMETERS-NO_OPEN;
    On last idoc:
    - set OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDFINAL = 'X' (this is not absolutely necessary, but prevents further appending to the spool);
    - restore OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDIMMED from the value saved on first idoc;
    Calling Smartform:
    - set CONTROL_PARAMETERS-NO_DIALOG = 'X';
    - call smartform passing OUTPUT_OPTIONS and CONTROL_PARAMETERS;
    The logic is somewhat complicated; I'd wrap it in a class (singleton, which would be de-instantiated after last idoc) to avoid global data and code other than simple method call(s) in FM.
    Even if you decide to refactor the logic, it would still be important to understand, I think, why the current logic does not work (where and why smartform gets closed)... Maybe there are some nasty "surprises" somewhere, and your current algorithm should work.
    cheers
    Janis

  • Account balance = 0 but open items exist in the accountu201D

    hi  gurus,
    while creating the g/ls by mistake i have checked the open item management which now has balances and the status shows its open which is not suppose to happen. well i cleared the balance and made it zero balance and when i go back to FS00 to remove the check and try to save it ,     
                               it says  "Account balance = 0 but open items exist in the accountu201D
    i tried to search for the solutions on the forum and figuered out an  answer which says OBA5 actually deals with solving the problem. but i am clueless as to how can i solve it with tcode OBA5...
    REGARDS
    sayeed

    Hi Sayeed
    If my understanding is correct, you want to remove the open item management check box in FS00
    All standard purpose its not possible
    But you can go to a program named RFSEPA02 and command the open item management portion in the program
    BEWARE - NOT AT ALL RECOMMENDED BY SAP
    The above solution is your going to create a Z program of the standard, now execute the program with the GL account you want to do the open item management check box
    Before doing this, please block the GL account for posting
    Hope this will help you
    We have done this in 4.7 & 5.0, hope the same will work for 6.0
    Warm Regards
    Bala

  • If not possible to change, can i keep my email for firefox sync if that email account is closing down by its provider?

    i have just figured out after searching, that it is not possible to change my email for my firefox sync.
    it is already a nightmare for me that nokia email provider just simply closes down my account which i use for EVERYTHING in my life...
    i have somany account to change the email in it, but firefox sync doesn't allow me to do that.
    i really don't want to lose any details of my mozilla settings, so will it be possible to keep it with a non-existing email?
    or is there a way to open a new account with a new email and merge my settings to it?

    Doesn't sound like you are using Firefox Sync for its intended purpose. Plus, it sounds like you ''might'' be leaving your Sync data "all over the place" - using Sync on computers owned by strangers.
    Sync doesn't just "use" your Firefox data in real-time from the Sync server, it '''''downloads''''' your data to each device that you connect to your Sync account. That data remains on each device until it is removed manually. And if you didn't "unlink / disconnect" that computer when you were done using it, Sync will stay connected to your Sync account until the "owner" of that device gets tired of seeing "his data" get changed as your data changes. Plus, unless you manually remove your Sync username and password data from the Password Manager, that other person might be able to re-connect to your Sync account at will.
    Of course, the risks you are taking by doing that depend upon which types of data you fed to Sync in the beginning. Hopefully at least not Passwords.''
    IMO, you would be better off carrying a USB stick around with a copy of Firefox Portable to use on Windows computers that you don't own or don't have exclusive control over. Sync will work between "Portable" and regular Firefox, even when they're both being used on the same device, at the same time.
    That will "fix" two things - it will give you a 2nd "device" ''[even when plugged into your own computer]'' and it will allow you to use your own Firefox installation on on another persons computer without "sharing" your Sync data with that other person, where such is allowed by "permissions set on that device''. Nothing that you do will appear on any device that the USB stick is plugged into, at least as far as Firefox is concerned. That applies to any "loaner" computer that you might use, too.
    http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable
    As far as setting up a new Sync account goes, your data is in Firefox ''[even when it is in Sync, too]'' - so just "disconnect" from your current account, and then set up a new new account. At the end of the setup procedure the Sync service will automatically "Sync" your data to the new account, and you'll be "good to go".
    I highly encourage you to do the Firefox Portable on USB stick as I mentioned above, because it sounds like the way that you have been using Sync sounds very risky with your data. Once your data gets Sync'd to another persons computer its "meshes" with their data and is all but impossible to remove completely - unless the person set up a Logon User Account specifically for you and then deleted that LUA after you were done.'' Doubtful, because from what I have seen the "average" PC owner has no concept of what a Logon User Account is all about.
    In conclusion, ''tell me that you weren't sync'ing your Password data''.

  • Open item are not showing

    hi when iam using t code F-07 out going payment.iam getting
    there are no open items managed in account 250001(rental account)
    iam unable to post.

    hi Nagendra,
    To process open item first you need to maintain that GL account for Open Item. Go to T.Code FS00 and check in control Tab page there is 'Open Item Management' check box 'whether your rent account 250001 has maintained for open item or not. if  that account is P&L account then system will not allow you to maintain as open item. Only balalnce sheet GL account can be maintained as open item. If there is  any balance then  it will not allow you to make changes so, first make that account balance is 0 then change.
    thx
    Ganu

  • Account type M& GL with open item managment not permitted error

    Hi
    We are getting the below error message while trying to do Goods reciepting using MIGO transaction.We have created new plants and done all assignments...
    Account type M&GL account with open item management not permitted....

    Hi
    GL code is assigned for GR/IR clearing account..But in fs00,for GL account/Company code,Open item management is ticked..Can u tell me how to remove the open item management.When i untick the open item management it gives an error message as below...
    (you want to switch off the open item management function
    retroactively for an account, you must first clear all the postings
    currently on this account. You cannot make any changes to the account
    management method until this is done.)
    Iam doing config in development server...In production server open item management is unticked

  • FBRA-Document includes already cleared items - reversal not possible

    While reset and reversal using FBRA I am getting the following error. Please do let me know if any clue to resolve this issue.
    Document includes already cleared items - reversal not possible
    Message no. F5 308
    Diagnosis
    A reverse posting clears all line items that are managed as open items. This is not possible if one of the items in question has already been cleared by another method.
    System Response
    Error message.
    Procedure
    If you really want to reverse the document with the number you specified, display the cleared items and reset all those items for which you can find clearing document numbers. Then repeat the reverse transaction.

    Hi Dewang,
    Thanks for your quick responce.
    step 01- Posted Customer Invoice on 01-Jan-2011with RV doc with Rs-1200: Doc 111111
    Step 02- Posted Customer downpayment on 01-Jan-2011 with DZ doc with Rs-1200: Doc No 2222222
    Step 03- Clear Customer line items on 10-Jan-2011 with AB doc with Doc no- 3333333
    Trying to reverse Cleared Item (i.e. Doc No 3333333) with T-Code FBRA. While doing Reset and reversal we are getting the above problem.
    Please let me know if you need any information.
    Regards
    Raj

  • Reg: Certain Open Items are not showing in open item clearing F-44

    HI all,
    I want clear open items using with f-44 but cetain open items are not showing in opeing item clearing.   i checked in FBL1N all open items are shwoing i want see all open items inf-44 how to see plz help me
    with regards
    JK Rao

    Hi,
    Check whether you r giving some additional selection take it as none and are the items in the account have any special indicator  you might not be giving here.
    reward pts if useful
    regds

  • Account type M and G/L account with open item management not permitted

    Hi,
    I am getting the following error while applying VL02N (PGI) is "Account type M and G/L account with open item management not permitted".  Before I got an error like posting period and I have closed those posting periods 2008/08 and 2008/07.   Now I am getting this error. 
    Please provide the solutions to overcome this and I want to execute the full transaction.
    Thanks in ADVANCE.
    Kishore

    Hi Kishore,
    Please check these threads
    Account type M and G/L account with open item management not permitted
    Re: Account type M& GL with open item managment not permitted error
    Posting to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted
    Hope this would help you.
    Good luck
    Narin

  • Error M8-688 - Creation of several vendor line items is not possible for document type RN.

    Hello All,
    We are using the Net Invoice Posting with document type RN(Invoice- Net). We are generating different vendor line items in the accounting document based on the withholding tax codes involved in the invoice posting. When it comes to net invoice posting system is giving an error message M8-688 - Creation of vendor line items is not possible for document type RN. Is there is any way to create multiple vendor items with net invoice posting? Please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Chandu.

    I dont think that there is any way because it is a hardcoded error message.
          IF NOT t003-xnetb IS INITIAL.
            MESSAGE e688 WITH pi_rbkpv-blart.
          ENDIF.
    SAP is checking the customizing for net/gross posting per document type in table T003
    And if it is set up as net, then it is a hard error.

  • Document is alrady contains cleared items-reversal not possible

    Hi All,
    At the time of MIRO reversal we are getting error massage Document is already contains cleared items-reversal not possible
    actually one MIRO document using TDS line item and we make a payment for that TDS line item after that we try to reserve MIRO document that time we are getting error massage.
    Please help me to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    juhi

    Hi Spradip & Minesh,
    Thanks
    But as per my client they do the same in system but this document only not getting reveres why they don't know.
    but what we do because they want to reverse the document.
    Please help me
    Thanks & Regards,
    Juhi

  • MR8M-Document already contains cleared items - reversal not possible

    Hi Gurus,
    I am getting error message Document XXXXX 1000 2014 already contains cleared items - reversal not possible while cancelling IR via Tcode MR8M.
    Invoice was already paid twice by mistake hence we are trying to cancel via MR8M.
    I know we can do via FBRA by resetting the cleared item but is there any other options or workaround?
    Thanks,
    Kumar

    Hi Jurgen,
    Thanks for your reply;
    Invoice posted twice and 1 needs to be reversed. Please refer the attached screenshot.
    Thanks,

  • Pricing requirement- no overdue open items exist

    Dear All
    I need to create in pricing procedure a discount condition which would be activated if no overdue open items exist (ex. 2% discount if no overdue open items exist).
    Do you know if there is any standard requirement that I could use for this purpose?
    Thank you,
    Sylwia

    Hi Sylwia,
    I'm affraid you have to develop your own requirement routine for this purpose. You can base it on logic of funtion module ITEM_DERIVE_FIELDS.
    Kind regards,
    Marcin

Maybe you are looking for