Open Items exist.. Not possible to change parameters ??
Hi all,
I made some X account balance to zero. And now when I was trying to change the account as open item (prior not in open item mgmt), system says that 'Account balance is 0, but still open items exist. Change not possible'. What does that mean ?
Suresh
Hi,
Once transaction data is posted, GL Account cannot be made into an open item managed account. However, you can consider the following options:
1. GL Account Balance is ZERO: If the GL Account balance is ZERO, the GL Master record can be changed to Open Item managed Account or vice versa. But this will not change the transaction data already posted. Only future transaction data will be open item managed.
2. Until SAP version 4.0B SAP has provided a program to convert a GL Account to open item managed account after transaction data is posted (or vice versa). You can execute this program by blocking the GL Account and this will make the required changes in tables and also change GL Master record.
But this program is not available for execution in higher versions. Hence, you can copy the program into a Z Program and execute it. The name of the standard program is RFSEPA02.
Thanks
Murali.
Similar Messages
-
in system settings 15 item are not accessible, get the message: cannot open it, is not possible on intel based MAC. Items like security, iCloud user and groups network and more.
Genius bar told me to erase the harddisk and install OSX Maverick again. This has not changed the problems with the system settingsYou need to Repartition the drive as One partition which will erase all data from it and then reinstall OS X. then with the initial setup system you chose the language on the first screen that comes up. That sets the language for the whole system.
There is no other way of completely removing certain information created by a previous owner. this hold strue whether you are selling or give a Mac to someone.
To do the repartitioning you need to use the Online Internet Recovery system, if the Mac came with Lion 10.7 or above, or from the original system reinstall discs that came with it when it was new. -
Action not possible because change version exist
Dear All,
We are at SRM5.0- Extended Classic scenario and facing issues for changing some of the PO documents.
When the buyers are trying to change the PO, error is getting populated as 'Action not possible because change version exist'. This error is not allowing us to change the PO.
These POs are changed in the past and all the relevant changes are reflected to backend system with no issues. In other words Change Versions do exists for these POs. Flags for Change Version completion is also set and all historical versions can be seen but without change history.
Additional information -
1. No approval workflows are implemented for PO.
2. No locks are active for these documents.
Appreciate your help!
Regards,
SagarHi Sagar and thanks for your response,
well, actually the active change version won't be preserved in any case. It would be overwritten in the first scenario, and deleted in the second one. The reason why I'd like to have this "brute force" method is to face an eventual human error. Suppose that a disalignment between R3 and SRM has been created; my report basically "alligns" the SRM version to the corresponding R3 one. And suppose also that the user made a mistake so that the program must be used a second time. I'd like to provide a way to "UNDO" the first execution of the program, that is to say: i'd like to provide a way to OVERWRITE the actual active, change version, or alternatively delete the change version that the report did create the first time it has been launched.
Hope it's a bit clearer now
Thanks for any hint/suggestion you can give me
EDIT: Oh, and please... can you provide me further information about your solution? I mean, use of that FM to unlock an active version of the PO and then the proper call to BBP_PD_PO_UPDATE specifying how you managed input params. Thanks a lot
Edited by: Matteo Montalto on Apr 9, 2009 11:43 AM -
SSFCOMPOSER - 154 - No output request open. End not possible.
Hi Experts,
I'm trying to print multiple smartforms using FMs SSF_OPEN and SSF_CLOSE. Inside the main program RBDAPP01 (Inbound processing for IDOCS) there is a loop at the IDOCS to be processed. Deep within the processing, we have a custom FM being called which prints smartforms. Since there is a loop at the calling main program, I have organized the code in the custom FM such that the first IDOC calls SSF_OPEN and the last IDOC calls SSF_CLOSE, so that all IDOCS in between will be able to print their smartforms. Here is the call stack:
8
SAPLZCUSTOM
ZCUSTOMPROGRAM
113
FUNCTION
ZCUSTOMPROGRAM
7
SAPLPPC1
ZCUSTOMPROGRAM
136
FUNCTION
KK2A_GET_DATA_FROM_IDOC
7
SAPLPPC1
LPPC1U01
1
FUNCTION
KK2A_GET_DATA_FROM_IDOC
6
SAPLBD20
LBD20F0A
454
FORM
IDOCS_PASS_TO_APPLICATION
5
SAPLBD20
LBD20F0B
69
FORM
IDOCS_PROCESS
4
SAPLBD20
LBD20U05
260
FUNCTION
IDOC_INPUT
3
SAPLEDIR
LEDIRU02
182
FUNCTION
IDOC_START_INBOUND
2
SAPLBD12
LBD12U04
37
FUNCTION
APPLICATION_IDOC_POST_IMMEDIAT
1
RBDAPP01
RBDAPP01
388
EVENT
START-OF-SELECTION
The problem is:
1. When I only have 1 IDOC being processed, SSF_OPEN and SSF_CLOSE happens in the custom FM at the same time. This creates a successful spool.
2. Whereas, when I have 2 or more IDOCS, SSF_OPEN happens in the first IDOC, but then it goes back to the calling program, and then when the last IDOC is encountered SSF_CLOSE is called. The FM SSF_CLOSE in this scenario calls the exception INTERNAL_ERROR (sy-subrc = 2).
The system message is SSFCOMPOSER - 154 - No output request open. End not possible.
Why is this happening? Is it because that other programs (calling programs) may have affected the status of SSF_OPEN? It seems that the SSF_OPEN is no longer open.
Thanks in Advanced,
JackNo, it will not hold the smartform open, but you don't need to hold it open in order for printout to be accumulated in one spool. Spool system does the accumulation automatically, provided the spool requests that are to be added to an existing spool request are:
- generated in the same transaction and
- have the same attributes (such as user, title, output device, client from which the request was issued, number of copies, priority, cover sheet setting, archive mode, and ABAP session number).
Important is: where do OUTPUT_OPTIONS like printer come from currently? Is print parameters popup displayed on first Idoc for user to choose printer and options? Or do you use USER_SETTINGS = 'X' to simply take over defaults from user master? If the print options dialog is displayed, it needs to be controlled as well so it's displayed only once.
Assuming print options come from the user in dialog, the logic without explicit open/close could look somewhat like this:
On first idoc:
- call SSF_OPEN importing JOB_OUTPUT_OPTIONS to display print options dialog; move-corresponding JOB_OUTPUT_OPTIONS to global OUTPUT_OPTIONS;
- set OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDNEWID = 'X' and clear OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDFINAL, to ensure new spool will be started (overriding user choices for these parameters!);
- if the user has set OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDIMMED = 'X' save it globally and clear it;
- set CONTROL_PARAMETERS-NO_OPEN = 'X';
On subsequent idoc:
- clear OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDNEWID;
- clear CONTROL_PARAMETERS-NO_OPEN;
On last idoc:
- set OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDFINAL = 'X' (this is not absolutely necessary, but prevents further appending to the spool);
- restore OUTPUT_OPTIONS-TDIMMED from the value saved on first idoc;
Calling Smartform:
- set CONTROL_PARAMETERS-NO_DIALOG = 'X';
- call smartform passing OUTPUT_OPTIONS and CONTROL_PARAMETERS;
The logic is somewhat complicated; I'd wrap it in a class (singleton, which would be de-instantiated after last idoc) to avoid global data and code other than simple method call(s) in FM.
Even if you decide to refactor the logic, it would still be important to understand, I think, why the current logic does not work (where and why smartform gets closed)... Maybe there are some nasty "surprises" somewhere, and your current algorithm should work.
cheers
Janis -
Account balance = 0 but open items exist in the accountu201D
hi gurus,
while creating the g/ls by mistake i have checked the open item management which now has balances and the status shows its open which is not suppose to happen. well i cleared the balance and made it zero balance and when i go back to FS00 to remove the check and try to save it ,
it says "Account balance = 0 but open items exist in the accountu201D
i tried to search for the solutions on the forum and figuered out an answer which says OBA5 actually deals with solving the problem. but i am clueless as to how can i solve it with tcode OBA5...
REGARDS
sayeedHi Sayeed
If my understanding is correct, you want to remove the open item management check box in FS00
All standard purpose its not possible
But you can go to a program named RFSEPA02 and command the open item management portion in the program
BEWARE - NOT AT ALL RECOMMENDED BY SAP
The above solution is your going to create a Z program of the standard, now execute the program with the GL account you want to do the open item management check box
Before doing this, please block the GL account for posting
Hope this will help you
We have done this in 4.7 & 5.0, hope the same will work for 6.0
Warm Regards
Bala -
i have just figured out after searching, that it is not possible to change my email for my firefox sync.
it is already a nightmare for me that nokia email provider just simply closes down my account which i use for EVERYTHING in my life...
i have somany account to change the email in it, but firefox sync doesn't allow me to do that.
i really don't want to lose any details of my mozilla settings, so will it be possible to keep it with a non-existing email?
or is there a way to open a new account with a new email and merge my settings to it?Doesn't sound like you are using Firefox Sync for its intended purpose. Plus, it sounds like you ''might'' be leaving your Sync data "all over the place" - using Sync on computers owned by strangers.
Sync doesn't just "use" your Firefox data in real-time from the Sync server, it '''''downloads''''' your data to each device that you connect to your Sync account. That data remains on each device until it is removed manually. And if you didn't "unlink / disconnect" that computer when you were done using it, Sync will stay connected to your Sync account until the "owner" of that device gets tired of seeing "his data" get changed as your data changes. Plus, unless you manually remove your Sync username and password data from the Password Manager, that other person might be able to re-connect to your Sync account at will.
Of course, the risks you are taking by doing that depend upon which types of data you fed to Sync in the beginning. Hopefully at least not Passwords.''
IMO, you would be better off carrying a USB stick around with a copy of Firefox Portable to use on Windows computers that you don't own or don't have exclusive control over. Sync will work between "Portable" and regular Firefox, even when they're both being used on the same device, at the same time.
That will "fix" two things - it will give you a 2nd "device" ''[even when plugged into your own computer]'' and it will allow you to use your own Firefox installation on on another persons computer without "sharing" your Sync data with that other person, where such is allowed by "permissions set on that device''. Nothing that you do will appear on any device that the USB stick is plugged into, at least as far as Firefox is concerned. That applies to any "loaner" computer that you might use, too.
http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable
As far as setting up a new Sync account goes, your data is in Firefox ''[even when it is in Sync, too]'' - so just "disconnect" from your current account, and then set up a new new account. At the end of the setup procedure the Sync service will automatically "Sync" your data to the new account, and you'll be "good to go".
I highly encourage you to do the Firefox Portable on USB stick as I mentioned above, because it sounds like the way that you have been using Sync sounds very risky with your data. Once your data gets Sync'd to another persons computer its "meshes" with their data and is all but impossible to remove completely - unless the person set up a Logon User Account specifically for you and then deleted that LUA after you were done.'' Doubtful, because from what I have seen the "average" PC owner has no concept of what a Logon User Account is all about.
In conclusion, ''tell me that you weren't sync'ing your Password data''. -
hi when iam using t code F-07 out going payment.iam getting
there are no open items managed in account 250001(rental account)
iam unable to post.hi Nagendra,
To process open item first you need to maintain that GL account for Open Item. Go to T.Code FS00 and check in control Tab page there is 'Open Item Management' check box 'whether your rent account 250001 has maintained for open item or not. if that account is P&L account then system will not allow you to maintain as open item. Only balalnce sheet GL account can be maintained as open item. If there is any balance then it will not allow you to make changes so, first make that account balance is 0 then change.
thx
Ganu -
Account type M& GL with open item managment not permitted error
Hi
We are getting the below error message while trying to do Goods reciepting using MIGO transaction.We have created new plants and done all assignments...
Account type M&GL account with open item management not permitted....Hi
GL code is assigned for GR/IR clearing account..But in fs00,for GL account/Company code,Open item management is ticked..Can u tell me how to remove the open item management.When i untick the open item management it gives an error message as below...
(you want to switch off the open item management function
retroactively for an account, you must first clear all the postings
currently on this account. You cannot make any changes to the account
management method until this is done.)
Iam doing config in development server...In production server open item management is unticked -
FBRA-Document includes already cleared items - reversal not possible
While reset and reversal using FBRA I am getting the following error. Please do let me know if any clue to resolve this issue.
Document includes already cleared items - reversal not possible
Message no. F5 308
Diagnosis
A reverse posting clears all line items that are managed as open items. This is not possible if one of the items in question has already been cleared by another method.
System Response
Error message.
Procedure
If you really want to reverse the document with the number you specified, display the cleared items and reset all those items for which you can find clearing document numbers. Then repeat the reverse transaction.Hi Dewang,
Thanks for your quick responce.
step 01- Posted Customer Invoice on 01-Jan-2011with RV doc with Rs-1200: Doc 111111
Step 02- Posted Customer downpayment on 01-Jan-2011 with DZ doc with Rs-1200: Doc No 2222222
Step 03- Clear Customer line items on 10-Jan-2011 with AB doc with Doc no- 3333333
Trying to reverse Cleared Item (i.e. Doc No 3333333) with T-Code FBRA. While doing Reset and reversal we are getting the above problem.
Please let me know if you need any information.
Regards
Raj -
Reg: Certain Open Items are not showing in open item clearing F-44
HI all,
I want clear open items using with f-44 but cetain open items are not showing in opeing item clearing. i checked in FBL1N all open items are shwoing i want see all open items inf-44 how to see plz help me
with regards
JK RaoHi,
Check whether you r giving some additional selection take it as none and are the items in the account have any special indicator you might not be giving here.
reward pts if useful
regds -
Account type M and G/L account with open item management not permitted
Hi,
I am getting the following error while applying VL02N (PGI) is "Account type M and G/L account with open item management not permitted". Before I got an error like posting period and I have closed those posting periods 2008/08 and 2008/07. Now I am getting this error.
Please provide the solutions to overcome this and I want to execute the full transaction.
Thanks in ADVANCE.
KishoreHi Kishore,
Please check these threads
Account type M and G/L account with open item management not permitted
Re: Account type M& GL with open item managment not permitted error
Posting to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted
Hope this would help you.
Good luck
Narin -
Error M8-688 - Creation of several vendor line items is not possible for document type RN.
Hello All,
We are using the Net Invoice Posting with document type RN(Invoice- Net). We are generating different vendor line items in the accounting document based on the withholding tax codes involved in the invoice posting. When it comes to net invoice posting system is giving an error message M8-688 - Creation of vendor line items is not possible for document type RN. Is there is any way to create multiple vendor items with net invoice posting? Please suggest.
Thanks,
Chandu.I dont think that there is any way because it is a hardcoded error message.
IF NOT t003-xnetb IS INITIAL.
MESSAGE e688 WITH pi_rbkpv-blart.
ENDIF.
SAP is checking the customizing for net/gross posting per document type in table T003
And if it is set up as net, then it is a hard error. -
Document is alrady contains cleared items-reversal not possible
Hi All,
At the time of MIRO reversal we are getting error massage Document is already contains cleared items-reversal not possible
actually one MIRO document using TDS line item and we make a payment for that TDS line item after that we try to reserve MIRO document that time we are getting error massage.
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Regards,
juhiHi Spradip & Minesh,
Thanks
But as per my client they do the same in system but this document only not getting reveres why they don't know.
but what we do because they want to reverse the document.
Please help me
Thanks & Regards,
Juhi -
MR8M-Document already contains cleared items - reversal not possible
Hi Gurus,
I am getting error message Document XXXXX 1000 2014 already contains cleared items - reversal not possible while cancelling IR via Tcode MR8M.
Invoice was already paid twice by mistake hence we are trying to cancel via MR8M.
I know we can do via FBRA by resetting the cleared item but is there any other options or workaround?
Thanks,
KumarHi Jurgen,
Thanks for your reply;
Invoice posted twice and 1 needs to be reversed. Please refer the attached screenshot.
Thanks, -
Pricing requirement- no overdue open items exist
Dear All
I need to create in pricing procedure a discount condition which would be activated if no overdue open items exist (ex. 2% discount if no overdue open items exist).
Do you know if there is any standard requirement that I could use for this purpose?
Thank you,
SylwiaHi Sylwia,
I'm affraid you have to develop your own requirement routine for this purpose. You can base it on logic of funtion module ITEM_DERIVE_FIELDS.
Kind regards,
Marcin
Maybe you are looking for
-
Condition Records for Handling Units
Hi Experts, I want to add a new Key Combination into VV61 (Ship-to-party + Shipping Mat. Type) for a new Output Type. Please tell me how to do it. Thank you. Regards, David
-
I am trying to resolve this after setting up my new Farm.I am having 2 wfe ,1 sppserver,1 server dedicated for crawl ,1 for search and index in my farm. I guess dedicated crawl server is the root cause of the issue,i also did disableloopback check
-
Excisie duty updation problem during RG1 register update
Dear All, During updation od RG1 register, excise duty has not been updated in Rg1 register. Transactional entry updated but Exice duty/ ecs/ CEss is showing zero value. It happened with two materials only. all excise master data has been maintained
-
HT4859 Some of my notes were deleted, can I restore them?
Some of my notes were deleted by mistake, can I restore them?
-
Receiving Error 13019 when syncing,
I'm receiving error message 13019 when i sync my Ipad2 to Itunes, has anyone had this problem?