Operation and Sub operation link in routing -reg

Hi,
In one of our report development we have to seggregate the operation number wise suboperations
which table and fields we have to use ?
we have to down load all the operations and sub operations for a given routing from the system and should be able to display for this operation these are all the sub operations and display their operation timings
please guide
regards,
Madhu Kiran

Hi,
If i go to some operation and add one sub operation for it , i am not getting in the tables both operation and sub operation
i think both are getting stored in the same field
can some one give some logic of fields connection to fetch the sub operatiosn of an operation ?
PLPH table has no entries at all in our system
i try to use PLPO and PLAS
i require basic logic of flow
how to get the suboperations of an operation
pl help
regards,
madhu kiran

Similar Messages

Difference between parallel sequence and parallel operation in a routing.

Hi Experts,
Can any one explain me with example the difference between parallel sequence and parallel operation in a routing? wHEN CAN WE USE PARALLEL OPEARTION AND PARALLEL SEQUNCE WITH COMPONENT ALLOCATION.
Regards
Deepak sharma

I think u need to modify ur quest... i think u r asking about Parallel sequence and alternate seq. Below are the details from SAP site.
A parallel sequence enables you to process several operations at the same time.
You use an alternative sequence for example, if
--The production flow is different for certain lot-size ranges
For instance you can machine a work piece on conventional machine or on NC machines. A NC machine has a longer set-up time than a conventional machine. However the machining costs are considerably less. Therefore whether you use NC machines will depend on the lot size.
---The production flow changes under certain business conditions.
For instance, if you have a capacity problem, you have some production steps performed externally by a vendor.

Mass change for QM at operation level in routing

Dear Experts,
I have to carry out mass change for Quality Management at operation level in routing. The steps that I am carrying out for an individual record are as follows.
1.     CA02
2.     Inspection point 100 is maintained at header level
3.     Go to operation level
4.     At operation level work center and control key have been maintained
5.     Double click on operation
6.     When I scroll down here I go to Quality Management: Inspection Points view.
7.     There by default in Insp.pointCompletion system shows the option as u201CQuantity, valuation (production) and radio button selected default indicates u201CQty-relatedu201D
8.     I want to change these options as only u201CValuationu201D and u201CNo relationu201D respectively
My queries are,
1.     Is there any T-code available to carry out these changes in mass?
2.     Is it possible to do this without any Z development?
I am doubtful about using LSMW here. I would be highly grateful to you if someone can help me step by step.
Thanking you,
Anand Rao

Hi Sujit,
Thanks for your reply!
I tried CWBQM. Unfortunately could not succeed. I think may not be feasible through CWBQM.
But I came across T-Code CEWB . There I opted "SAP_OPERATION" as working area and it worked. Its quite useful T-Code.
Thanks again for your input.
Regards,
Anand Rao

How to call a previous operation in the routing in the backend?

(We have a requirement to call a previous operation in the routing in the backend and create-assemble-complete the SFC.)
Routing would be u2013 OPERATION_1 -> OPERATION_2 -> OPERATION_3
The SFC has not been create and we are using u201CCreate SFC On Demandu201D.
The production operator is given the SFC value to use, however, the POD is configured to START the SFC at OPERATION_2
The desire is to process the SFC at OPERATION_1 as a u201Cblindu201D operation to production.
The question: If we use a PRE_START activity, is it possible to launch the PRE_START activity at OPERATION_2 and have the activity:
1) Create the SFC,
2) Start the SFC at OPERATION_1,
3) Assemble a child SFC (part of the activity information),
4) Complete the SFC at OPERATION_1,
5) Upon completion of the SFC at OPERATION_1 finalize the activity and allow the SFC to start at OPERATION_2 normally?
Thanks and Regards,
Avinash
Edited by: Avinash Fernandes on Feb 16, 2012 3:30 AM

Hi,
a managed property only gives you a anlde to a bean or property, it doesn't execute it. To execute a bean, you can use a custom JSF PhaseListener that calls a bean method. The reference to the bean is achieve through value binding
ValueBinding vb = FacesContect.getCurrentInstance().getApplication().createValueBinding("Name of Managed Bean);
TypeOfBean theBean =(TypeOfBean) vb.getValue(FacesContext.getCurrentInstance());
.... theBean.theMethod() ...
Frank

OPERATION DETAILS IN ROUTING

Hi Experts
In the operation details of routing- CA01 there is control -either based on time or Quantity for every operation. What it mean. If time based is it denoting the time for the particular operation. What it mean if "quantity based " is preferred.Can I have details please.
Also will you give a scenario with some operations mentioned where I can use routing.
Pranav

Hi Gajesh, Thanks
I take your case - "Suppose you have 4 operation. Forming, lathing , quality checks and painting. Normaly in production system you will have a quality check in between the process".
here check necessary in 3rd step - quality check. So am I to select time based / quantity based for operation -3 only ( because only it will have MIC ). Can I go without selecting time based / quantity based option also (if so how - what option i need select in the operation details for the 3rd operation).
Next, in CO11N. I confirm operation -1 ( here what option I hav to select - either partial confirmation / final confirmation). As per my logic, only partial confirmation need to be selected (what quantity I hav to enter here for yield- is it the total production order quantity = total target quantity).
similarly, 2nd operation- lathing- I select partial confirmation- enter yield/scrap etc
3rd operation is qc check- is it possible that production person will confirm this step in co11n itself without waiting for the qc person to confirm using QA32. ( here what yield to be entered and how if we use QA32 )
4th -painting - finally ( as my logic goes -final confirmation selected and operation confirmed for the total production order quantity)
Tell me if right. I noticed that if final confirmation option selected in the first operation itself, all the 4 operations can be confirmed in the co11n itself ( by selecting final confirmation option for all 4 operations)by the production department. Am i wrong somewhere. If this is so, how Qc person has control over the process.
Also what yield /scrap quantity will be entered for each 4 operations in co11n ( is it mean the wastage occuring in each step =scrap and remaining quantity =yield). If so the final yield by operation -4 will be surely less than the production order quantity ( if wastage occurs during lathing/forming)
regards,Pranav

Operation scrap in routing

Hi All,
I want to know,what is the effect of maintaining operation scrap in routing?It does not effect the component qty allocated to that operation(as it dus in case of maintaining operation scrap in BOM).
Pls guide

Hi Gautam,
Operation Scrap In the Routing is the amount of scrap (in percent) for the operation.
The effect of operation Scrap in the Routing :
The scrap in the operation causes a decrease in quantity in the next operation because the quantity to be processed is reduced by the scrap quantity.
The reduction of quantity is taken into account in scheduling and costing.
Hope you understood the point.
Thanks,
Srinivas

Tables to see operations of a routing that are already confirmed?

Hi everyone,
I would be very grateful if someone could tell which tables should I access in order to know if an operation in a routing has or hasn't been already confirmed.
Thanks in advance and best regards.
Ben.

If you are doing confirmation by operation wise by CO11N,change the confirmation type from partial to Final conf in the screen.
If you are doing by CO15, indicate radio button final confirmation when doing conf.
If you want automatic selection of final confirmation goto SPRO>SFC>DEFINE CONFIRMATION PARAMETER.
U can check in table AFRU table Order Confirmations.
Completion confirmation number for the operation.
Kevin

Costing of the operation in the routing

Hai gurus,
I have 5 sets of operation in the routing.
a) Operation 10/20/30/40 and 50
b) In Operation 10/20 and 30 the , costing is active in control key PP01
c) In operation 40/50 the costing is in active in the control key zp01
If that is so, whether operation 40 and 50 will be considered for costing during confirmation or not
regards,
sekar chand

Hi,
If the costing relevancy is ticked in control key & in operation. Along with the relevant prices maintained in KP26, system will do the costing. To double confirm, run CK11n for that material & verify the same.
Revert if you face any issues.
Regards,
Vivek

Rework operation in the routing

Hi All,
We are in the REM process, We plan to change the existing Routing so that need to include the rework as the operation in the routing.
we are not going to do rework for finished product (i.e after the confirmation). if any problem , we make it as the scrab.
we need to do the rework for the product before final stage of inspection itself . ie. we have a inprocess inspection .
i.e we have a operation called soldering, if this is not done properly, we remove the soldering and do it again as a rework.
1.how to mapp this operation as rework in the routing
2. whether we need to create the separate routing for rework or we can add this rework operation in the same existing routing itself ?
3. if we do rework for the assembly, we can do create the rework, but in the component stage itself
we need to do the rework.
Edited by: raj on Jun 5, 2009 7:37 AM

Hi Ramaling,
my scenario is like , we have 10 operation, after the 3rd operation, we have the inspection as the 4th one.
if any qty have rework , we have done the rework manually .
so client need us to create the WC for rework and they need to find the cost inoccur for the rework
after rework was done ,all the other operation will continue for the reworked materials.
how to include this rework WC in the routing what we used.
is it advisable or not
if it is not how to mapp my scenario ?
Edited by: raj on Jun 5, 2009 12:52 PM

WRE54G expander and D-LINK 624 router

Note: DI-624 has 4 lines ethernet wired connectors and 1 wireless antena.
With WRE54G powered and ethernet connected to the router line 2, the CD used to setup the expander did not worked at first time and resulted in a message in the computer: The WRE54G can not associated this AP in repeater mode. The next step was to change the configuration of DI-624 by accessing the IP address of the router (Web page of D-link). I put security desable and applied the new configuration to the router but loss the wired (line 1) connection to the internet by DI-624. I reboot the computer and internet came back. I started again with CD setup and the message desappeared but the red light still ON even with the message congratulations in my screen for Linksys setup. When I disconnected the ethernet cable to the expander and after few seconds, for my surprise the both leds went to blue light. When I returned to secure mode in the router, the expander return to red light. Then I decided to run setup with WPA enable until final with congratulations in my screen of Linksys setup wizard but with red light on the expander. After removing the ethernet cable, then after few seconds the Expander turn both leds to blue color. I sent this mail by a computer in the lower floor using this WRE54G expander.

Well is your D-Link router supports WDS (wireless distribution system), if yes… WRE54G may work with this router…

BT Softphone and D-Link 2740B router problem

Has anyone managed to work out how to set up a D-Link 2740B router so that BT Softphone will work?
The best help I can get from BT INDIA is change the baud to 5060, what ever that means?
I am not a techie, so any help in a simple step by step fashion would be most welcome.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

no thats no what i thinking about... i dont want to connect any devices as handsets ect to my laptop, laptop must be free as is now if this router have VOIP in the lastest firmware i think i can connect router to my bt broadband line then standard handset to the router and thats it. From the router level set the voip softphone internet telephony connection for this handset and thats it.... then if I will need another standard landline handset then simply connect it straight to the bt line... thats my vision....no devices connected to my computer its not working that way
If you already have bt home hub its working away from your computer so only one reason to change router is to do it in the same way as BT.... as BT have rubbish routers and with more than one laptop in the home network just cut the connecton this making me mad.....

Table Link between Equipment and Sub-equipment

Hi all
My requirement is this
I have one mobile set with a serial number. for that mobile set i have one battery with a serial number, now i want to link both the serial numbers, one as main and another as sub item
I tried by maintaining the battery serial number as sub-equipment in the main mobile set equipment number master,
Let me know the table link between equipment and sub-equipment
I want a report based on the input mobile set equipment number what are all the sub-equipment associated with the main equipment
Also suggest is there any other approach,
Regards
Amuthan M

Hi
EQUZ is the table,if u give the sub equipment in equipment field and execute.you can find the main equipment in superior equipment field

Linking of Main and Sub Reports

Hi,
We have a requirement to integrate all the crystal reports (say 10 nos) into one single main report for the statutory purpose as per the client requirement. Basically client would like to view all these ten reports in single file by export them into single PDF. These sub reports are also going to work as an individual reports independently and having their own prompts. The data source for these reports is SAP BEx queries.
Please let me know best approach for integrating these reports, since user doesnu2019t want to
pass the values for duplicate prompts. Please note there are common prompts (BEx variables) across these sub reports.
I have done the PoC for linking single sub report using Xtreme data base and here are my results.
1.      Create a Blank Main reports and create a Country Prompt.
2.      Link the sub report with main report using this Country Prompt.
3.      Link the sub report with main report prompt and edit the sub report selection formula with the main report prompt u2013 u201C{Customer.Country} = {?Pm-?Which Country?}u201D
4.      While refreshing the report, it will refresh the sub report based on the main report prompt value and shows corresponding data.
5.      This approach works for single report and gives the expected results and asks only single time prompt selection.
Challenges On the above approach while implementing using BEx Queries as a data source are:
u2022      We need to equate the SAP BEx characteristics to this prompt:
Ex:       = {?Pm-?Which Country?}
That means we should have set of BEx queries which doesnu2019t have variables. At run time filters will be assign based on the main report crystal reports prompts. Again there could be some mandatory prompts and optional prompts and multi values etc.
Will it affect the performance of the Crystal report while you apply filters at report level instead of BEx query level?
u2022      We donu2019t want to modify the individual sub reports selection formulas and queries for linking purpose.
Please let me know youu2019re best solution approach for the above issue.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Som

If I understand correctly the main issue a report running as a sub report being run as a main report.
I have a solution.
for each of the sub reports build a new main report
ie if you have
sub report 1
sub report 2
then youhave a master report that calls them
you would build
Main report 1 ( which ONLY calls sub report 1)

Standard test key in operation overview in routing

Iam not able to see standard text key in operation overview in routing beside control key column. Any setting for it .

hi,
I dont think that that the STK is dispalayed in the operation overview.
so first ensure that the STK is defined in the WORK centre basic data view. Then goback to the operation view of u r routing.
Double click on the operation ,then u will find in the OPERATION details view that u r STK is diplayed just below your CONTROL key.
GURUS pls correct me if i am wrong,
PLs update on this
THNX
HKR

Wireless connection between D-Link WiFi router and Time capsule stopped working

We have an ISP provided D-Link wireless router (DIR-615) to which we wirelessly connected our 2Tb Time Capsule for back up and to connect a USB printer to out network. This worked perfectly for 3 1/2 years, until about a month ago, when the time capsule suddenly decided to go "off line". ie we could no longer access it or the printer via our wireless network. We had changed nothing - just one day it stopped working.
We tried to get it back online with no success. As the 2Tb Time Capsule was almost 7 years old and had had some HDD issues in the passed, we figured it had got old and died and that it was time to replace it; so we bought a new 3Tb Time Capsule, thinking this would get everything back to normal.
However much as we tried, we were also unable to get the new 3Tb Time Capsule to connect wirelessly to the D-Link wireless router. The Airport Utility did not show the D-Link wireless router or its wireless network, although we were (and are) able to see it in Systems Preferences>Networks from all our multiple devises. This in itself seemed odd. No matter what we tried, the Airport Utility would not find the D-Link wireless router and hence we could not add the 3Tb Time Capsule to the existing wireless network.
At the end of the day we got fed up with trying to add the 3Tb Time Capsule to the D-Link wireless network, and connected it via a LAN cable to the D-Link router instead. We then set it up as its own network. Worked gerat. Having done that we thought maybe the old 2Tb Time Capsule might not have been the problem after all, so we tried extending our new 3Tb Time Capsule wireless network using the 2Tb Time Capsule wirelessly. This worked perfectly! And we are now almost back to what we wanted.
So although we have a work around, this means now have 2 separate wireless networks as opposed to the original single wireless network where everything talked to everything else.
Can anyone shed any light on any of the following:-
1. Why the original wireless network connection between the D-Link router and the 2Tb Time Capsule just stopped working? Was there some software change from Apple that "decided" D-Link wireless routers were no longer secure; and therefore the TCs could no longer connect to them?
2. Why it was not possible to extend the existing D-Link wireless network using the the new 3Tb Time Capsule?
3. Is there is anyway that we can get back to a single wireless network based around the D-Link wireless router as the primary router connecting to the modem, where the 2 Time Capsules connect as "wireless satellite base stations"?

1. Why the original wireless network connection between the D-Link router and the 2Tb Time Capsule just stopped working? Was there some software change from Apple that "decided" D-Link wireless routers were no longer secure; and therefore the TCs could no longer connect to them?
A firmware update to the TC came along and you agreed to it without perhaps even noticing.. it then smashed your setup because Apple do not recommend the setup you were using and it is very poor.
2. Why it was not possible to extend the existing D-Link wireless network using the the new 3Tb Time Capsule?
Because it is such a poor setup that Apple have taken away your ability to choose it unless you know exactly what you are doing.
3. Is there is anyway that we can get back to a single wireless network based around the D-Link wireless router as the primary router connecting to the modem, where the 2 Time Capsules connect as "wireless satellite base stations"?
Yes, this I can help you with.
I have several ways around the problem.. but the first one is.. why use the DIR-615 at all.. it is not a modem.. it is a very ordinary bottom end, poor single band slow wireless router.
Why don't you simply remove the DIR-615 from the network completely.. plug whatever it is the ISP supplies you.. an ethernet connection from whatever that modem is you mentioned into the WAN port of the Time Capsule. And use the TC in some router mode.. same as the DIR-615 was setup.. dhcp or pppoe or whatever.. I doubt the TC cannot match it.
If you have issues please post a few screenshots from the DIR-615 to show how it is setup from the WAN side.. and as long as you are given the username and password or whatever the ISP uses to authenticate then chuck out the DIR-615.
Tell me if that is a goer.. if not we can work out a few other methods..
eg. Simply turn off the wireless in the DIR-615. It is poor cf the TC and there is no need for it.. with the TC in bridge only use the TC for wireless as well as wireless extend with your old TC.
Or setup roaming network where everything uses the same SSID.
Then you will have one wireless network. And it won't matter what as long as it connects.. although IMHO this is not right as the TC is such a superior router now you are wasting your new TC.

Operation and Sub operation link in routing -reg

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for