Operation sequence in BOM

Hi friends,
while defining Bill of material, operation sequence number is populating by default as 1, does it really matter to exactly use operation sequence number (10) from routing?
Will it be any issue from planning or mfg perspective If I setup bill of materials with operation sequence as 1 (as default) and operating sequence numbers in routing are set up as 10, 20, 30 etc... ???
Please let me know.
Regards,
kumar

Hi,
Benefits of keeping Operation sequence as 10, 20, 30 etc.
1. End user will know at which operation particular material from BOM is required
2. In case of Operation Pull, material will be consumed at appropriate operation sequence (This will not matter if you are using Assembly Pull, Push or any other Supply Type). This will impact costing.
3. You will be able to add same components against different operations
4. In case of planning, planning engine will give appropriate suggestions (if Mfg lead time is short then this will not matter)
5. You will be able to print pick slips based on operation seq. i.e. If you want to issue components required at operation 10 only then you can achieve that using this method
6. You will be able to scrap components effectively
etc.
Regards,
swapnil Mehar

Similar Messages

  • Scrap quantity to be minus with operation sequence is not check in co01

    hello!
    PP experts
    i have problem in confirmation of production order.
    suppose i have production order  of 15 qtys.with four operation to be confirmed (co11).
    operation  qty.yield  srcap qty.
    0010          1 5              0
    0020          14              1
    0030          14              0
    now, in 0020 operation i have 14 yield & 1 srcap quantity & when i go for 0030
    operation for confirmation it will show the default quantity of previous operation,0020 qty. i,e 14 qtys.but if i put the quantity 15 in this operation (0030)
    its allowing to confirmed 15 qtys. because the plan qty is 15.but i want to minus the 1srcap qty. from 15 plan qty. & system should allowed only 14 qtys
    (15-1=14) for confirmation.plus i want the flexibility of operation sequence not to checked.
    i set operation sequence - error when operation sequence is not adhered to in OPK4,its minus the scrap qty. but not allowing the flexibility of operation sequence
    confirmations.
    please send me the setting for the above query in the confirmation (co11)
    regards,
    mangesh
    thsnks

    Mangesh
    1) you have confirmed yield qty14 nos in operation 020 , scrap Qty 1
    2) Automatically in during confirmation of operation 030, in yield qty field 14 nos is coming
    3) If you want to change that operation 030, yield qty into 15, system giving error message
    4) you want the system to accept the 15 nos in operation 030
    Pl state whether my understanding is right

  • Scrap quantity to be minus with operation sequence is not check in co11

    hello!
    PP experts
    i have problem in confirmation of production order.
    suppose i have production order of 15 qtys.with four operation to be confirmed (co11).
    operation qty.yield srcap qty.
    0010 1 5 0
    0020 14 1
    0030 14 0
    now, in 0020 operation i have 14 yield & 1 srcap quantity & when i go for 0030
    operation for confirmation it will show the default quantity of previous operation,0020 qty. i,e 14 qtys.but if i put the quantity 15 in this operation (0030)
    its allowing to confirmed 15 qtys. because the plan qty is 15.but i want to minus the 1srcap qty. from 15 plan qty. & system should allowed only 14 qtys
    (15-1=14) for confirmation.plus i want the flexibility of operation sequence not to checked.
    i set operation sequence - error when operation sequence is not adhered to in OPK4,its minus the scrap qty. but not allowing the flexibility of operation sequence
    confirmations.
    please send me the setting for the above query in the confirmation (co11)
    regards,
    mangesh

    Hi,
    The same  question was asked few days before by MR Gowri Sankar. The same question you are repeating
    check in OPKP Production scheduling profile in the confirmation Tab
    Enable the check box Adjustment quantities in order to actuals and then try
    in CO11n.
    Also you need to set the overdelivery tolerance as warning message in opk4.
    Regards,
    nandha

  • Operation Sequence & Confirmation Type  checked at PO Confirmation-CO11N

    Hi All,
    Thanks in Advance for solution.
    My client wants that, at the time of Production order Confirmation - CO11N, SAP should check Operation Sequence and its Type of Confirmation (Partial or Final)
    For Operation Sequence I have done necessary Configuration (SPRO) settings in Confirmation parameters. But how to check for Confirmation TYPE??
    For Example, I have production order with 5 operations, now if I confirm First (1st) operation with PARTIAL CONFIRMATION, then when I confirm Second (2nd) operation with Final Confirmation, it should check that previous operation is Partially Confirmed and thus allow me to confirm Second operation only Partially. Currently I am able to do Final Confirmation for Second operation in above scenario.
    How can the above thing be restricted please let me know?
    Regards,
    Ravi Davda

    During  configuration  the confirmation parameters are set as per the follow IMG path
    Production> > shopfloor control >> operation >> confirmation >> Define confirmation. Here we have 3 views in the first view of generally valid setting we will
    give check 1) error when operation sequence is not adheredto
                    2)  & 3) Error If over delivery & Underdelivery tolerence is not maintained as per Workscheduling view of Material master record
                    4) Error if the quality inspection value not exist
    In the 2nd view ONLY we have General individual screen in that we have
                    1) confirm type : choices are Partial / Full confirmation
                    2) Goods movement : If the indicator is set the system will give log screen message and ask you to say Y or N to correct the errors in goods movement
                 An other indicator for Quantity / activity as  control indicator
                 I think this will help
         Regards,
         Raj

  • Check of operation sequence in order

    Hi all,
    I don't want to check of operation sequence in order. so  how can I do this? Are there any customizing for this case?
    Best regards,
    Hilal Çakır
    email : [email protected]

    Make the following changes in control key or use the control key which have this setting
    In OPJ8, for a control key
    Confirmation = Confirmation possible but not necessary
    In OPK4, for a plantb and production order type combination in Generally valid settings tab page -
    Checks sub page
    operation sequence = set operation sequence is not checked
    With this setting  it will work

  • Operation sequence

    Hi, my operation sequence is mix of std and parellel, how to maintain the same thru ca01? when i click on sequence, always std is appearing and it is grade out, not changable. how to select diffenrt seq like parallel or alternative>?

    Dear Yadav,
    Plz refer this link
    [Routing;
    Regards
    kumar

  • Operation sequence restriction in CO19

    Dear Guys,
                We have 5 operations (10,20,30,40,50) for an material. I already assigned the value for confirmation field of control key "PP01" as "2 Confirmation required". But during production operation confirmation by using CO19, system allows user  to skip the operation confirmation process without confirming the previous operation. If i change the value of operation sequence as"Error when operation sequence is not adhered to" in "parameter for operation confirmation" screen, the  issue will be solved? what kind of values i want to set for this issue?
    current value as "operation sequence is not checked"
    Thanks

    Raja Sekaran wrote:
    If i change the value of operation sequence as"Error when operation sequence is not adhered to" in "parameter for operation confirmation" screen, the  issue will be solved? what kind of values i want to set for this issue?
    >
    > * current value as "operation sequence is not checked"
    >
    > Thanks
    yes, that setting in OPK4 should be enough.
    The following is the documentation
    Check of operation sequence in order
    Defines whether a system message is to be issued when the operation sequence is not adhered to and if so, which type of message.
    This key only applies to confirmations at operation level.
    Dependencies
    To find out whether the operation sequence has been adhered to, the following checks are carried out:
    Have preceding operations already been confirmed?
    Does the confirmed yield from the preceding operations exceed the total confirmed quantity of the operation to be confirmed?

  • Select query in routing(operation,sequence)

    Hello frds,
         i am into change routing BDC actually i want a select query .....for like existing of operation for a particular sequence in routing....
    if i will found operation for particular sequence i will run the bdc code lese i will exit...any one can help me...
         just provide me a query....to check existnece of operation for a particular sequence......ASAP...

    Why on earth would you want to keep the queries separate? As Tom Kyte would say, databases are born to join!
    Providing emp_id has an index on it (and it should, assuming it's the table's primary key!) your "complex" (or, what I would call simple*), it'll most likely be faster than doing it separately. You've not got the context switches for one thing.
    If you want to see what the optimizer does with your query, you should run a trace on the query. An explain plan would give you an idea of what it's going to do, too.
    In general, doing something like this procedurally is going to almost certainly be worse than doing it in SQL (and by worse, I mean slower).
    * I'd hate to see what you'd call some of the monster queries I work with, if you think that query is complex!

  • WIP or scrap calculation for parallel operation sequences not possible

    hi,
    i want to calculate wip and scrap along with parallel sequence
    system prompts following mesage any suggetions plz send in higher priority
    Message no. KV161
    Diagnosis
    If the routing specifies a sequence of operations that are defined as a parallel sequence, this will have the following effects:
    The system cannot interpret the confirmed scrap quantities in cumulative and periodic settlement when it calculates the scrap.
    The system cannot calculate work in process at target costs for this order because it does not recognize the relevant operations.
    Procedure
    If you want to calculate scrap or WIP, do not define parallel sequences.
                                                                                vishnu

    Hi Robert
    Though I am seeing this msg for the 1st time - I can give you a some insight into this
    It seems you are in product cost by period (PCP) scenario ... In this scenario, WIP is calculated at target cost.... The mechanism of calculating WIP is Confirmed Qty at preceeding operation - Confirmed Qty of next operation..
    In your case, since you have parallel operations in your routing, system wont be able to calculate WIP... I am not sure how parallel ops are defined... You need to get in touch with your PP guy....
    But, one thing for sure , with parallel ops you wont be able to calculate WIP in PCP scenario
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Operation sequencing in R/3 not scheduled

    I have a routing with one operation for a machine.  In APO I need to finite schedule both the machine and the operator capacities.  I created a second work center for the labor and added a parallel sequence to the routing to start and stop at operation 0010.  The formula in the labor work center is the standard for labor capacity and labor scheduling.  The execution time for the standard operation, machine time, and the parallet sequence for the labor is the same.  But when I use the 'schedule' function in the routing to check the scheduling data the machine operation is scheduled correctly but there is no time scheduled for the parallel sequence.
    Has anyone had this issue before, and if so what corrective action needs to be taken or what have I set up incorrectly.

    I need for APO to finite schedule both resources.  If I create the requirement as a secondary capacity on the work center it is not identified in APO (in the PDS) as a calendar resource.  And only calendar resources can be finite scheduled.  In this case both the machine and the labor are critial.  I cannot over schedule any one machine and I have a limited number of operator capacities.  Therefore both have to be finite scheduled.  I have 36 seperate machines but only 8 operators.  I therefore cannot have more than one order at a time on a machine and no more than eight total orders at any one time due to the limited number of operators.
    If I simulate the scheduling in the routing I have duration for the standard operation but nothing for the parallel operation.  In the PDS I only see the capacities for the machine and setup operators which are a second capacity in the machine work center, but no capacity for the parallel operation.
    If you have a better idea let me know.
    Side note - data for parallel operation is not going to the PDS in APO.  But that's another issue.
    Thanks for the info
    Regards,
    Stan

  • How  to attach more than one department (operation sequence) for an component

    Routing For Assembly-A
    Opeartion Seq Dept ...
    10 DEPT-1
    20 DEPT-2
    30 DEPT-3 AND THE ASSEMBLY-B GOES THROUGH ALL DEPARTMENTS
    For example the BOM is like this
    Assembly-A
    10 Assembly-B
    WHEN ROUTING IS ATTACHED TO BOM IS IT CORRECT TO DO LIKE THIS.
    ITEM SEQ OPER.SEQ
    10 10
    10 20
    10 30. IF THIS IS CORRECT THEN INDENTED BILL WE DIFFERENT ALSO SAME ITEM WILL REPEAT. CLARIFY

    Could you pls. put your question in detail?

  • Change in operation sequence- routing

    If at 3 rd operation m/c is under maintenance, we can skip 3rd operation and go for 4th and 5th operations. after 5th opration we want to do 3rd operation. what will be best way to map?

    YS,
    In SAP, generally the seuqence of operation is supposed to follow.
    Your requirement can be mapped by two ways,
    1. System won't restrict you confirm in between operations untill & unless you sepcify the same in the define confirmation parameters.
    So you can directly confirm the 4th & then 5th operation without confirming the 3rd operation. While confirming the 4th operation the system will issue the warning message mentioning that the preceding operation is yet to confirm. Same can be ignored.
    After this the 3rd operation can be confirmed as & when you performed the same. 
    You will have data of confirmation date wise for every operation.
    2. The other way around is to delete the operation no. 3 from the order & reinsert it when it is planned i.e. after 5th operation.
    This way you can process the operation 4 then 5 & the new operation representing the 3rd operation.
    I would recommend you to go for second solution if this situation arises once a while or first one is better.
    Hope this helps you.
    SmanS

  • Confirmation of parallel sequence operation.

    Hello friends,
    I want to do confirmation of parallel sequence operation. I use 3 or5 work centers  at a time for doing one operation. So i have defined parallel sequences for standard sequence. When I do confirmation of quantity and activity time in CO11N for one parallel sequence, other sequence quantity and activity time should be decreased. But system takes actual  quantity and time.
    How to make settings , so that  quantity and activity values should be decreased automatically for next parallel sequence.
    Waiting for Reply!

    Dear ,
    You are not able get the paralle sequence operation in CO11N because production order will copy the Routing based on the Order Type dependent paramter-OPL8-Routing  set up.
    Here , basically , you might have chkeced Alternative Sequence  and Sequence Exchange field (0)  , so while creation production order , routing with operation which are in alternative sequnce will be copied  and will be used in CO11N confirmation.
    2.You need to maintain "Operation Sequence is not checked " for operation sequence for the Ordertype/Plant combination in confirmation parameters using transaction OPK4.-Confirmation parameters of Order
    Try and revert back
    Regards]
    JH

  • In-process inspection- operation wise result recording sequence

    Hello Everyone,
    I have just come across a requirement and would be grateful if someone can help me out in this regard.
    1.     This is make to stock discrete manufacturing scenario.
    2.     Inspection type 03 has been activated in material master.
    3.     The setting in OPK4 are, error if no inspection results exist and error when operation sequence is not adhered to.
    4.     As a result of which I cannot confirm the operation in CO11N unless result recording is done for corresponding operation.
    The requirement,
    1.     User should not be able to carry out result recording for operation 30 unless at least 1 quantity of operation 20 (preceding operation) is confirmed. Likewise it should behave for rest of the operations.
    2.     Practically material is processed for operation 30 only if 20 is confirmed. Therefore operation 30 should be inspected after 20. System allows to input result recording for all the operations irrespective its confirmations.
    Is there any standard solution for this or should I go for any exit?
    Thank you,
    Anand Rao

    Hi Sujit,
    Thanks for so prompt response.
    I am using inspection point 100. Still it is not restricting. The operation confirmation is done through CO11N and not feasible for users to perform it through QM module.
    The logic is, if I try to carry out result recording for operation 30 , system should firstly check whether any confirmation number exists or (at least 1 quantity is confirmed)for previous operation i.e. 20. If not it must stop doing RR for 30 operation.
    Whether exits QEEM0011 and QEEM0015 can restrict this, as by their description I think these work after entering RR. Here it is required before RR. Any guesses?
    Thank you again for your kind reply.
    Regards,
    Anand
    An addition,
    Even though QEEM0011 works before valuation user is able to enter RR. The requirement is user should not enter the any RR irrespecive of valuation. If user enters RR and do not valuate it this exit may not work and eventually can allow to confirm OP30.
    Edited by: Anand Rao on Aug 24, 2011 1:21 PM

  • Fixed BOM - Assembly Operation and Data to Collect on Assembly

    On a fixed BOM for a repetitive order the Assembly Operation is populated with the correct operation for reporting consumption to ECC.  However, the Data to Collect on Assembly on the material is set to NONE.  Why does ME do an auto assemble at the first step for all the material regardless of the setting of the Assembly Operation on the BOM?

    Hello,
    If assy data type is set  to NONE, component is considered as auto assembled component. These type of components are automatically installed into parent material during SO release. This is controlled by a hook that is set up and enabled by default on site level.
    regards,
    Konstnatin

Maybe you are looking for

  • Installing problem on Windows 2003 Server 64 bit

    Dear All, I'am trying to install XE onto a Windows 2003 Server 64 bit.. The installation process ends without any errors but the database itself seems not to start. I tried several hints that have been mentioned here within the forum. But none of the

  • Is there any way to change the in-browser PDF software?

    After upgrading to mountain lion, the in-browser PDF software changed to Adobe. I have been trying to figure out a way to change it back to preview for quite some time now. My reason for wanting it changed back is that the Adobe software is very slow

  • Mail Server Question

    Hey everyone, I'm having trouble with my mail server. More specifically SMTP. When I checked the logs, this is the error I got for Postfix: fatal: bind: private/smtpd. Does anyone know what that means? What should I do to fix it? Thanks for your help

  • Settings for Material shortage status (MSPT) in PM orders

    For the purpose of material availability check in PM order, i have made the settings in IMG (OPJJ,OIOI). Still i am getting error that "No Checking group maintained for production (Component) in Plant xxxx. I have maintained the availability check in

  • Shipping point , delivery creation date

    Hi :   I have a custom table with fields : belnr, posnr, btyp, aufnr, ebeln, ebelp, livbeln, liposnr,matnr,wadat,kunnr,werks,bmeinh,getri,inaktiv,wabukz,erdat,aedat,loekz. Custom Transaction with fields : vbeln (field name belnr) , aufnr, delivery vb