Order Settlement not happening

Hello All,
While settling a TECO ed Process order ( wich is not fully delivered), system is not settling it & giving a error message 'Order doesn't have status delivered <b>or</b> TECO.
And even SAP Help says either TECO or ELV is mandatory.
please suggest a way to Settle a order which is not Delivered but TECOed. As there will be a lot of orders, its not possible to activate DLV for each order individually.
Regards
Mahesh

Hi Mahesh,
I dont agree with the concept that "TECO" or "DLV" status is required only then settlement can be done. This is valid if the default rule in Controlling-Tab of "Order Type dependent parameters"(OPL8) is "PP1".
If this is changed to "PP2" you are allowed to settle the cost periodically, without "DLV" and "TECO" status.(Some cost should exist, interms of GI or Confirmation for the period)
I would suggest you to discuss this with FICO consultant in your project before making the changes.
Hope this will resolve the problem......Reward your points,
Regards,
Prasobh

Similar Messages

Order settlement not possible for investment order.

Dear All
We are doing the settlement for the order. settlement recever is order & we are getting the following error.
Account 320501 requires assignment to CO object.
Please guide me.
Regards

Dear Pete
The message is as follows. Message class KI & number 235.
Text
Account & requires an assignment to a CO object
Diagnosis
You have not defined a CO account assignment for an account that is relevant to cost accounting.
System Response
Account is defined as a cost element.
This means that you must always specify a CO account assignment.
Procedure
Enter one of the following CO account assignments
Order
Cost center / cost center/ activity type
Sales order item (for a project or cost relevant)
Project / WBS element
Cost object (Process manufacturing)
Network/ Network activities
Business process
Profitability segment
Real estate object
The posting row affected is , account .

Process order settlements not flowing into BI for Inventory

Hi,
I built a cube for inventory based on the standard extractors to generate MAC values. I have three MAC reports, each for daily, weekly and monthly. The reports give the right values at the at the month level , but whenever there is a settlement for process order done, BI does not pick the settlement value and this makes the MAC value shoot up at the daily and weekly level. I tried to a find an extractor for this settlement and could not find any. Can someone please help me with this ? Is there any datasource for settlement of process order?
Thanks

Hi,
Both Tomas and Debraj have provided good tips. Let me elaborate on this.
From SWU3, access Maintain Runtime Environment -> Schedule Background Job for Missed Deadlines by double clicking on it and execute it. You could maintain the interval until next deadline check. You could keep the number low.
Also, if you have the event queue turned on, some times the work items will stuck in the queues and took a long time for them to be available.
Best Regards,
Jennifer Cha
GRC RIG

CCS Details are not getting updated to COPA in Sales Order Settlement(VA88)

Dear Experts,
Our scenario is MTO with valuated material.
1. Production order is tagged to Sales Order.
2. Production order is settled to Material and variance is getting posted to COPA.
3. At the time of Delivery, COGS Debit (Cost Object- Sales Order), Credit - Inventory.
4. At the time of Billing, Accounting Document is getting generated, COPA document is not getting generated.
5. We are not executing WIP. (as per Business process)
6. Settlement is done thru transaction code VA88. COPA Document is getting generated.
I am facing the following issues in the above MTO process.
1. At time of sales order settlement thru VA88, In COPA, only COGS is getting as updated with one value field i.e. Material Cost. Cost Component data (Material Depreciation, Labor etc..) is not getting updated to COPA.
2. When I settle the Sales Order thru VA88, Billing Quantity is not getting updated to COPA though Quantity field mapping is done properly.
Please help me how to resolve the above issues.
Note: Same Cost Component Structure, we are using for Make to Stock scenario. Cost Component Data is getting updated Properly to COPA (at the time of Billing)
Regards,
vgl
Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:52 AM
Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:54 AM

Hi
1. CCS (Cost Comp Split) wont be updated to COPA if you settle via sale order.. In sale order, COGS cost element is posted.. the same will get settled to COPA as one single value...
In MTS, the CCS gets updated to COPA upon billing because of the "valuation" strategy customization... Billing posts to COPA in that case, COPA gets Sales Qty and it is valuated with CCS to give you the break up.. But, in your case, Billing is not posting to COPA, but to sales order.. hence, there is no qty flow into COPA upon billing.. thats why you dont get CCS for MTO
2. The sales qty should be updated to COPA upon VA88.. For this, make the following settings in your PA transfer structure which is used during VA88
1. Go to KEI1, Select your PA transfer structure...
2. Add an assignment line in it... Check on "Qty Billed/Delivered" in the assignment line
3. In the Tab "Value Field" below "source", assign Qty Field
Now when you settle, it should update qty as well
regards
Ajay M

Source determination not happening during PR creation from Planned order

Hi Experts
We have set up source determination and we have created a sourcelist of material and a vendor is fixed, there is a inforecord alos maintined,
I am trying to convert a planned order from MD04 to a purchase requisition, the source is not being assigned for the PR, I am alos getting an information saying that 'the material is defined for inhouse production'
secondly if I click the 'Assign Source of Supply', then I am getting an error 'not possible to assign a source of supply'.
The material is a finished material 'FERT' with procurement key 'X' so in MRP an planned order gets generated for converting a PR or a production order.
Note - I was doing this effectively in a differnt client without any proble. I am unable to find what I am missing, please sugest.

Nagaraj Chaganti wrote:
Thank you everyone for the suggestions, The issue is resolved by testing with a new material with tproper master data. Basically the problem occured when some user created additional inforecord for the same P,Org hence there was no automatic source detemination happening.
>
> Bye with regards.
a second info record may explain that AUTOMATIC source determination ddid not work but it does not explain the error messagees you described earlier.

Statistic condition values not updated during Sales order Settlement

Hi,
In our client we have different Price condition types for based on scenario wise. Ex: Domestic Sales (ZPR1) and Export Sales ZPR2. I have maintained separately value fields for each price condition types.
We are booking some financial charges, and interest on working capital etc., this cost we need to transfer to COPA each Material wise based on sales revenue.
For this purpose we have created one COPA Assessment Cycle. Tracing factor is Sales Revenue and receiver is Materials.
In COPA Assessment cycle we can give only one base means ZPR1 related value field or ZPR2 related value field.
For this reason we have created one new statistic condition type, what is amount there in ZPR1 that amount will updated automatically in statistic condition place and so that we can give once one trance factor in COPA Assessment Cycle. We have assign this statistic condition all pricing procedure
Now my problem is in MTS scenario statistic condition values updated correctly. But in MTO scenario sales order settlement time statistic condition values not updated.
So is it possible update during sales order settlement time statistic condition values.
Please give me suggestion.
Regards,
Thiru

Hi Ajay Sir,
As you said is correct.
But in our client we have around 9 Plants and each plant manufacturing product are different. Client Requirement is in COPA Report they need see each product wise sales revenue. In this way we mapped product wise value field. System already mapped one guy in this way earlier. Now I am doing some changes for relevant to month end activities.
Some financial changes transfer to COPA each plant wise on Material. Here sender is cost center and receiver is Material. Base is Sales Revenue.
Please suggest me is there any alternative.
Regards,
Thirumalesh .

A report which displaies orders discerning SETTLED/NOT SETTLED

Hi All,
Could anyone show me a report which displaies the orders (and type orders) discerning between the orders settled and the ones not settled?
Thanks
Gandalf

You can try using KOC4 . This is not exactly which are you are looking for ,but this report definately is helpful for your analysis whethere the cost has been settled or not .
regards
Ranjan

List of Orders - Fully settled / Partially settled / Not yet settled

Hi All,
Is there any standard report which gives the list of all those PM orders which are related to settlement.
i.e. Fully settled / Partially settled / Not yet settled
I tried to see the report in IW39 by comparing the fields such as 'Total actual costs' and 'Total settlement', but the 'Total settlement' field is always having the value as 0.00, irrespective of whether the order was fully settled / partially settled / not yet settled.
Any help on this is appreciated.
Thanks in advance. JK

Fantastic Pete !
I was able to get the answer throughy the foll. T Code / Report:
1. KOC4: Order selection
2. S_ALR_87013015: List: Actual Debit/Credit
Many thanks for the help.
Best Regards
JK

Order is showing in T code# VKM3, which should not happen.

Client using automatic credit check. Customer maintained credit master data for which system is doing credit check. As per client requirement the future orders created for this customer system should not do a credit check.
For this we have created a new risk category and in the T code #ova8 , unchecked all the settings for this combination of credit control area, risk category and credit group. We maintained the new risk category in the credit master data of that customer, and created a new order and found that the system is not doing any credit check and system is allowing for the billing. However when but this order is showing in T code# VKM3, which should not happen.

Hi- SAP always shows orders in VKM3 even though they do not have credit hold... SAP lists all orders which have item cat deliver or billing relevant..
Reg
Siva

Automatic Batch Determination is not happening for New Sales Order Type

Dear Experts,
I have created a new sales order type ZBPY - For Free Sales, but automatic batch detrmination and batch pick up is not happening for new sales order type, but it is activated for all the other sales order types in Production Server, can any body let me know the steps how to map this new order type to batch management and let it behave like other order types.
Thanks in Advance.
Saravanan(EKS).

Hi Saravanan,
Kindly check the following steps for automatic batch determination.
1. First check the material is maintained with batch in the warehouse management.
2. Maintain new entry for search procedure for batch determination with the new created doc type.
3. Maintain new entry for automatic batch determination for sales order or automatic batch determination for delivery ( This depends on the business process of our client, whether they want to determine the batch with sales order or at the delivery level. check this and make new entry)
4. Create Batch using T.code MSC1N with proper date of manuf. and SLED.
5. Create Batch Search Strategy using T.code VCH1 with proper strategy type.
6. Maintain stock with active batch. check this with t.code LS26 or LS24.
regards
Ravishankar M

Availibility check not happening after credit block is removed for order

Hi All,
When we are removing the credit block on a sales order through report RVKRED09, the availibility check is not performed again because the qty in sales order is not confirmed.
As per my understanding when the report RVKRED09 is run, the sales order is called in background and the credit status is changed and then subsequently, the user exit MV45AFZF is called. In this exit, the values in wa-ybuk-cmgst is compared against wa-xbuk-cmgst. if i think wa-ybuk-cmgst is A and wa-xbuk-cmgst is B, then it means the credit blocked is removed and the return code is 8 which means availibility check is to be performed.
However in our case availibility check is not happening since the values of wa-ybuk-cmgst and wa-xbuk-cmgst are same which is B i..e the credit block is not removed...but however the report RVKRED09 shows that cedit status is changed.
Something is happening somwhere which is causing this. could any one guide. Also what is the program name which confirms the availibility check in sales order and also what is the program name which changes the credit status for a sales order in VBUK table.
regards
sachin

Hi
So as per your query , you have gone with the user exit in the program MV45AFZF , so check wheather any subprogram has been included where availability check wont happen.So just take the help of ABAP;er and then check wheather any program has been included related to availability check.
Regards
Srinath

Archive is not happening for Sales Order

Hello Friends,
I want to archive sales order but it is not happening.
Following is scenario.
I have completed sales order cycle till amount posting
va01-vl01n-PGI-vf01-f-28
and document flow has shown it is done but still when i am running report S3VBAKPTS it shows document can not be archived billing document is not complete.
Help me for the same
Regards
BHavesh

Hi,
once the subsequenat document created for a sales order, you cannot archive that sales order.
reagrds,
Sumith

101 movement not happening when production order got backflushed.

HI SAP Gurus,
For SKU 101 movement not happening when production order got backflushed, but 261 movement successfully happened. Please let us know any settings need to check?
Thanks and Regards,
SHARAN.

Hi Sharan,
A 101 movement for the production order takes place when
- You receive the production order via MB31
or
- Confirm the last operation which has PP03 control key
A backflush is done only for the components called by the production order & not for the header material.
Hope the above answers your query.
Regards,
Vivek

Work center change in Service order not happening

Hi Experts,
I am facing a problem when i try to Call a function module in update task where the Function module contains a call to BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN without COMMIT WORK.
This is done in order to update the Work Center while there are changes to the Warranty Status of the Repair Order.
So , i have written the Code in the Userexit_SAVE_Document so that the Update gets done.
But there might be problems when the Repair order does not get saved.
So keeping that scenario in mind, I tried using the Update task Function Module in which i wil lbe calling the BAPI for Changing/Updating the Service order.
BUT , The Change is not getting reflected in the Work centre of the Service order.
Thanks
VIJAYB
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jun 5, 2009 10:10 AM

Hai experts,
i have found the way to do the work center change in update task method .
I did call the BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN but without using COMMIT since this function module is called in Update task method so whatever is the change being done by that BAPI will be reflected in the Service order once the Update task has been done for that service order.
Thanks and regards,
VIJAYB.

Purchase order printout should not happen without release of PO

I have made all the settings for PO release strategy and printout settings. But printout can be taken even before final release. I checked the settings and this printout should not happen before release. Please help me out.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Thank ypu for your reply. PO was not released. Printout wa snot able to be taken in ME9F. But Printout can be taken using Print preview in Tcode ME22N. Can we avoid such printing using Print preview option.
Thank you in advance

Order Settlement not happening

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for