Order settlement to Material

Dear Friends,
We have the requirement Order settlement to Material. We have check in Allocatioan structure, I could not find material object.
Please help me.
Regards
Sree

Hi,
Please check the following
Which order type you are using and which settlement profile is assigned to it. To check it, please use KOAL T Code. Now double click on Order Type and check which Settlement profile is assigned? Now to check that settlement profile go through the following path
IMG > Controlling > Internal Orders > Actual Postings > Settlement > Maintain Settlement Profiles
Click on Settlement Profile. Now check that settlement profile which is assigned to that order type.
Now check the Default Object Type. it must be MAT and also check Valid Receivers.
I hope you will to come how MAT comes from.
Regards,
Jigar

Similar Messages

PROCESS ORDER SETTLEMENT - KO88

Hi!
As per my knowledge KO88 will be done for OHDS and for Material. OHDS settlement will be done in month ending which results the difference between KSII and KP26.
Can anybody explain how the accounting entry will be generated at the time of Process order settlement of material i.e. KO88.
Sreenivas

Hi
Settlement entries are same as in production order. No diff
However, u must be aware settlement entries are dependent on status of process order. If status is DLV or TECO wip is calcelled and variances are calculated. If status if PREL or REL or PDLV wip entries are posted.
Hope you have made settings in WIP for offsetting entries
Pls assign points if this clarifies else send query with more explanation

Make to order settlement

HI
Can gurus tell me what should be the settlement profile while using Make to order as when i am using settlement profile as SD1 which is standard then while creating Production order with respect to sales order ( CO08 ) system is giving error that "You can not make an assignment to make to order stock" but for the same order type if i am using Settlement profile as PP01 which is standard then system is behaving normal.
But as far as my knowledge in Make to order scenario, the settlement rule should be Sales order with line item number.
I am using strategy 20 and 25. Basically i am using Material variant concept in which when i am creating sales order, i m creating it using configurable material but as soon as i m selecting all the characteristics then system gives one pop-up and it shows the specific variant which is nothing but a configured material i.e FG. so the final sales order changed to configured material.
This is my scenario.
Please guide.
Regards,
Anand.

Hi,
The settlement profile assigned fororder type with standard sett profile (PP01) at OK07
The below are the some settings related to standard profile.
Actual cost /cost of sales = Can Be Settled
Valid receivers
G/L account - Settlement Not Allowed -
Cost center Settlement -Optional
Order - Settlement - Optional
Material - Settlement -Optional
Sales order Settlement -
Optional
Order Item Settlement -Optional
Assign this settlement profile in requirement class of make to order strategy which u assign in the material master.
I am not sure about it, sothat it can solve ur problem .
Use OSS notes 432109.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Production order settlement in case of non valuated material

Hello guys,
Our client wants some of the materials have to be non valuated. These materials are raw materials and SFG also. We can assign UNBW material types to those materials.
I have created one material for test purpose. It doesn't contain the accounting view so as no valuation class. BOM of it , doesn't contain any component as client doesn't want to show any consumption on production order.While creating the order for that material system asks for the settlement rule. I skip that step and create the order. I do GR for the same.
My question is, is production order settlement essential for these orders? What if we don't settle the order. No activity type has been assign to the work center.
Kindly give ur valuable inputs.

Hi,
No need to create material as UNBW type.
Normal ROH, HALB, FERT material type we can achieve this.
In the BOM of FG or SFG goto item detail screen there is a tick mark in costing.
Remove the tick by OS23 - BOM status.
Now you can do your production as regular. But cost will not get update.You can do regular settlement also.
Regards,
Dharma

Material Code for Process Order Settlement document

HI,
When Process Order to a material having Standard Price is settled, the following entry is passed.
Inventory Change A/C Debit/Credit
Price difference A/C Debit/Credit
It is being obeserved that in the line item of FI document for the Inventory Change the material code appears in the Price difference line items whereas for Inventory Change line item the material code does not appear.
I want to know why this happens ?
Regards
Partha

Using warehouse management /WM) :
- Create a control cycle for the component, using LPK1. Here you define if the supply will be specific for the order (when weighing takes place in the warehouse) or for released orders (normallu full packages of components and weighing is done at plant level). Reference to a supply area.
- The resource used in the operation has a reference to the supply area.
- Components have material master views in WM for the selected storage type
Then, when releasing the orders run LP10 - LP12 to generate the Transfer requirements for the raw materials. These TR will be converted to Transfer Orders and Confirmed, so the stock will be moved to your supply area.
Using Inventory Management, none of the above is required. You can use MF60 to move materials from General Storage Location to Shop Floor SLoc.
Regards

Material number in profitability segment in internal order settlement rule

Hello,
We have a process which is the following: the real posting for the revenue in the sales order is an internal order. Once the internal order settlement is done, then the values flow to COPA.
The material shows up in the revenue FI document, but it does not show when we look at the internal orders line items.
I need to have the material number from the sales order (from the revenue posting) automatically identified in the profitability segment in the settlement rule of the internal order.
Would anyone know how this can be done?
Thank you!

Hi,
Where exactly are you checking for the material no ? When you settle the IO to COPA a record type C will be created in COPA. Is the material no missing in the record type C ?
In that case if the sales order no is available on the internal order then you can in a derivation rule do a table lookup on VBAP and get the material no.
regards
Waman

Error message while creating production order with KMAT material strategy25

Hi PP Gurus I am running variant configuration cycle...Strategy 25, Custermer Req KEK (KMAT Matrl)
Sales order & MRP Picked the components correctly as per the dependencies
written. So Planned order generated against sale order.
When I tried to convert planned order to Production order...I am getting the
below error message..
Error Message:
You cannot make an assignment to make-to-order stock Message no. CO684
Diagnosis The component cannot be allocated to an individual stock because
make-to-order production and engineer-to-order production cannot be executed
with this order.
A possible cause is that you are trying to create an order with reference to a
sales-order/project, where an account assignment to a sales order/project is not
allowed in the settlement profile that is assigned to the chosen order type.
This is inconsistant.
System response The following responses are possible:
Order processing is cancelled.
The system resets the special stock indicator back to the original value.
Procedure Choose another order type.
I used order type with SD1 as settelement profile.
OVZG: default 046, settlement profile = SD1
OPJH: Settlement profile = SD1
Plz through some light on this if u have worked on Variant Configuration/MTO
settlements.
Question:
1) Is creation of production order with KMAT material supported by SAP?
2) If yes, why the above error occurs?
Waiting for Ur reply
With Best Regards

Dear R.Brahmankar,
I have check on the note, but it is not relevant to ecc6. The current system default setting is :
Standrad setting for reqt class 046
Special Stock E
Acct Assgt Cat. M
Valuation M
Settlmt Profile SD1
However if I change the Acct Assgt Cat. from M to E. It resolve the problem. I would like to know is this the right solution?
Config in Acct Assgt M
Consumption Posting = E
Config in Acct Assgt E
Consumption Posting = ' '
In F1 key of Consumption Posting field it shown following:
To flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying, enter an "E" (settlement via sales order).
If you do not wish to flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying, do not enter anything.
Dependencies
If you are working with nonvaluated sales order stock, always flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying.
If you are working with valuated sales order stock:
In the case of complex make-to-order production, flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying
In the case of sales-order-related mass production, do not flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying
Should we change to E?
Regards,
Ong

CCS Details are not getting updated to COPA in Sales Order Settlement(VA88)

Dear Experts,
Our scenario is MTO with valuated material.
1. Production order is tagged to Sales Order.
2. Production order is settled to Material and variance is getting posted to COPA.
3. At the time of Delivery, COGS Debit (Cost Object- Sales Order), Credit - Inventory.
4. At the time of Billing, Accounting Document is getting generated, COPA document is not getting generated.
5. We are not executing WIP. (as per Business process)
6. Settlement is done thru transaction code VA88. COPA Document is getting generated.
I am facing the following issues in the above MTO process.
1. At time of sales order settlement thru VA88, In COPA, only COGS is getting as updated with one value field i.e. Material Cost. Cost Component data (Material Depreciation, Labor etc..) is not getting updated to COPA.
2. When I settle the Sales Order thru VA88, Billing Quantity is not getting updated to COPA though Quantity field mapping is done properly.
Please help me how to resolve the above issues.
Note: Same Cost Component Structure, we are using for Make to Stock scenario. Cost Component Data is getting updated Properly to COPA (at the time of Billing)
Regards,
vgl
Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:52 AM
Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:54 AM

Hi
1. CCS (Cost Comp Split) wont be updated to COPA if you settle via sale order.. In sale order, COGS cost element is posted.. the same will get settled to COPA as one single value...
In MTS, the CCS gets updated to COPA upon billing because of the "valuation" strategy customization... Billing posts to COPA in that case, COPA gets Sales Qty and it is valuated with CCS to give you the break up.. But, in your case, Billing is not posting to COPA, but to sales order.. hence, there is no qty flow into COPA upon billing.. thats why you dont get CCS for MTO
2. The sales qty should be updated to COPA upon VA88.. For this, make the following settings in your PA transfer structure which is used during VA88
1. Go to KEI1, Select your PA transfer structure...
2. Add an assignment line in it... Check on "Qty Billed/Delivered" in the assignment line
3. In the Tab "Value Field" below "source", assign Qty Field
Now when you settle, it should update qty as well
regards
Ajay M

PM Order settlements - Difference between the amounts settled

Hi All,
This is regarding the PM Order settlements.
Every month end finance team run KO8G and settle the PM Order costs for that period (month). In the process the Orders are settled using a variant, which captures all the orders that has changed/created during the focused period.
But in the report S_ALR_87013015 - List: Actual Debit/Credit there are balances for previous settlements and thereu2019s a difference between the amount settled and the debit/credit amounts.
When drilling gown we found that this is due to following reasons,
1. Some orders are not settled fully.
2. Equipments issued against a Order are returned after the settlement process
Ex: one Order has settled in Oct 2008 initially and fully in Jan 2009. However one material has been returned to stores in February 2009. Therefore a difference (cost of the material) between total actual cost (Dr Amount) and settled amount has been arisen.
The Orders of nature 1 will be captured and settled in the subsequent run of KO8G.
But my question is how can we address the orders of nature 2? Changing the settlement variant is one option.
Also appreciate if someone can explain the SAP-best practice of PM-Order settlements.
Thanks,
Thushantha.

Hi Thushantha,
After returning the material to store check the actual cost of maintenance order. Once you fully settle the order means it becomes zero.
When you will return material to warehouse against maintenance order once again carry out settlement of maintenanc order then check for your nature 2.
Sundar

Production order settlement (Accounting entries)

Dear Sapians,
I need your advice to clear my following confusion:
I have a finished material which is maintained on Variable price in material master. Assume the price being 100 and only 1 item is in stock currently.
My production department produces 1 qty of the same material now and the total cost of that comes to 500.
Now when the finished goods GR is done to store. The material price booked is picked from the current material master price (i.e) 100. The system posts the following entry
FG Stock A/c Dr 100
   To Cost of good sold 100.
Now the production department is doing the settlement of the above production order. After settlement my material master price changes from 100 to 300 (i.e) 2*300=600. (I find no accounting entry generated during settlement) What actually happens during settlement?
When the goods is delivered(PGI) for sale to the customer. (eg) we sell one unit
The system passes the following entry:
Cost of goods sold A/c Dr      300
To FG Stock A/c                    300
I this above case i feel that my finished goods stock will go negative.
Is the above activity correct?.
I will be greatful if you can explain me the above process completely.
Regards
Naveen

Dear Deepak
Thanks for all your help. I have assigned the maximum point which i can for your support.
Actually the accounting entries i was looking for is as follows:
When 101 is done after production (i.e) GR after production
FG STock A/c
To Factory output A/c
The above entry is posted @ price maintained in the material master.
When the actual settlement of Production order is done using tcode KO88 the system posts the variance between the material master price and the actual price and posts
FG Stock A/c DR
To Factory output A/c
(in case of actual cost is more than the material master price)
OR
Factory output A/c
To FG Stock
(In case of actual cost is less than the material master price)
Please correct me if i am wrong
Once again thanks for you time
Regards
Naveen

How to open field WERKS in Internal order settlement rule

Hello experts,
Could you explain please how to add field PLANT (WERKS) in internal order settlement rules. I would like to fill out this field during the settlement process.
Any advices will be very appreciated.
Regards,
Ivan

HI Ivan,
Please post more details on your business scenario. Why you want to add plant field in the rule?
To which receiver you want settle your internal order? If you want to settle to a material for instance, plant will be one of the field available. Try double click on settlement rule to get to detailed screen.

Statistic condition values not updated during Sales order Settlement

Hi,
In our client we have different Price condition types for based on scenario wise. Ex: Domestic Sales (ZPR1) and Export Sales ZPR2. I have maintained separately value fields for each price condition types.
We are booking some financial charges, and interest on working capital etc., this cost we need to transfer to COPA each Material wise based on sales revenue.
For this purpose we have created one COPA Assessment Cycle. Tracing factor is Sales Revenue and receiver is Materials.
In COPA Assessment cycle we can give only one base means ZPR1 related value field or ZPR2 related value field.
For this reason we have created one new statistic condition type, what is amount there in ZPR1 that amount will updated automatically in statistic condition place and so that we can give once one trance factor in COPA Assessment Cycle. We have assign this statistic condition all pricing procedure
Now my problem is in MTS scenario statistic condition values updated correctly. But in MTO scenario sales order settlement time statistic condition values not updated.
So is it possible update during sales order settlement time statistic condition values.
Please give me suggestion.
Regards,
Thiru

Hi Ajay Sir,
As you said is correct.
But in our client we have around 9 Plants and each plant manufacturing product are different. Client Requirement is in COPA Report they need see each product wise sales revenue. In this way we mapped product wise value field. System already mapped one guy in this way earlier. Now I am doing some changes for relevant to month end activities.
Some financial changes transfer to COPA each plant wise on Material. Here sender is cost center and receiver is Material. Base is Sales Revenue.
Please suggest me is there any alternative.
Regards,
Thirumalesh .

How to see Process Order settlement details?

Dear Experts,
How do I view the accounting/controlling details after a Process Order Settlemnet is carried out?
In OBYC, what is the posting transaction for Order Settlement through which I can see the valuation class & G/L account assigned?

Hi,
IF you wish to check the Accouting documents or settlement documents , you can check throw CO88 select Previous Settlement to check the detaiils or else you can go to KOB1 Order line item display for checking all the line items.
in KOB1 T.code you can check all the documents including Material and other by double clicking the items.
Hope this will Help you ..
Thanks
Goutam

Process order settlement to cost center

Hi,
We have a requirement to settle only the quantity to material and the costs to
cost center from the process orders. This is to ensure the materials are
handled as non-valuated and the COGM is computed from the goods consumption
postings.
The process orders will have both co products and by products as well.
There is also one more requirement to allow Purchase orders against the non-
valuated materials.
I am planning to propose the following :-
1) To make the materials valuated but set the standard price to zero to give
the effect of non-valuated materials and at the same time can also raise
purchase orders because otherwise non-valuated materials cannot be used to
raise Purchase orders.
2) When goods receipt happens from the process order the actual costs of the
process order will remain as it is in the process order since the standard
price of the FG is zero and only the quantity will be received into inventory.
3) When process order settlement happens the full actual costs will be settled
to a price difference account and cost center tied to the price difference
account.
Do you guys see any flaws in the above design?
Edited by: FICO Consultant on Feb 21, 2012 4:28 AM

Answered

Process order - settlement rule

hi experts,
our client has a R&D trial batches scenario .
for that they will create a process order and the cost should go to cost center of r&d and not to matrial.
at present i get MAT in settlement rule , so the cost is settled against material.
i need CTR to come in default when i create the process order instaed of MAT .
please advice.
regards,
satish

If PS is implemented
for project related production for R & D
1) create a project profile with non valuated( for raw material procurement for project the price is taken from info record.
2) assign the production material in activity
3) maintain a settlement rule as cost center R &D
4) Run a MRP for a material
5) convert plan order into production order, system will set the WBS as settlement rule
6) Do the GI in MB1A or co11n ,confirmation in Co11n & GR in MB31 or MIGO or in CO11n
(If the material is valuated, system will take MAT as default ( as per the setting in OPL8 default settlement rule as PP1 or PP2)
the reason is if material is valuated, variance = (GI value + activity value) - GR value
only the variance in settled in settlement, so the variance value( (GI value + activity value) - GR value ) is going to MAT
if the material is non valuated then variance =(GI value + activity value) )
7) do the settlement for production order ( the variance (GI value + activity value) ) is settled to WBS element
8) after that confirm the project in CN27.
9) settled the project in CJ88, the cost will settled to relevant cost center
if PS in not implemented
or go head with
you can create a order in CORO itself by maintaining settlement rule as CTR with R& d cost center( manually)
we can't make particular cost center as default in settlement rule.

Order settlement to Material

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for