Output ALV format as FBL1N For all Vendors as indidual block

Dear Folks,
Please Suggest the Function Module or sample report Format for output as FBL1n for all vendors as group of first vendor and second vendor and so on .. .. . please suggest
Regards
ASHOK K

Hi ,
     I have to use variant or layout option i think.
huv to use these options to get my alv report like FBL1N output.
    In FBL1N the function FI_ITEMS_DISPLAY is used.
     But I can't use that function my program.
    Because my output structure is different.
    huv to make it out.
     Regards
   siva
Edited by: siva on Jul 23, 2008 6:47 AM

Similar Messages

Change FAX number for all vendors and customers in a massive way.

Hello,
I need to change the FAX number for all the vendors and custormers in Q01 so that every form should output through an specific test fax-printer. The problem is that I don't know which field I should change and how can i do it in a massive way. I have heard something about catts but i don't know almost anything.
Could you help me?
Thanks in advance.
Luis Álvarez.

Hi Luis,
Use tcode XK99 for vendor mass change, select the Fax no field. You have to take note that this changes will be only 1 fax number for all vendors.
Else you have to use BAPI for mass change.
regards,
maia

How do I get vendor name in FBL1N for multiple vendors

Hi gurus. When I run FBL1N for a single vendor, the vendor name shows up. If I run FBL1N for multiple vendors, the list is subtotaled by vendor number, but the name goes away. How can I get the vendor name show up when the list is for multiple vendors?
Thanks
Janet

Well, we'll just have to deal with the header data. It is REALLY strange to me that NAME1 is a field you can choose in this report but not in FBL1N.
By the way, we try very hard to give our users a usable solution so that they don't have to download to excel. However, SAP doesn't always cooperate...... : (
Thanks again for your help today. You have solved my problem.

What is best windows compatible web share format once and for all?

Wmv looks good, but I don't want to buy flip4mac studio. The other formats I have tried look bad and are huge files. I have searched forum for answer in vain.

sorry to say, but there's no "best" ...
* best for windows is .wmv (non Apple compatible, YOUhave to pay for an exporter)
* best compatibility for all is a free upload service, as youtube, videogoogle, et al (.. hm.. quality..? )
best quality is h264, needs a free install of "Quicktime for Windows" on PC (some PCusers don't like to add QT on their fragile system) ...
* best in means of cheap is iSquint, creates a good looking, small .mp4 (which some PC don't "like", allthough Windows is able to handle .mp4 outside any containers (mov/avi) ..) ...
PS: you'll find ~4000 video codecs out there, but no universal one, nor "best" ....

Common customer for all vendor returns

dear friends,
In my current project all our stocks are maintained by a third party warehouse who receives material from vendor and despatches to customer. Despatch Instructions to him is sent by outbound delivery from SAP. When vendor return happens he expects an outbound delivery from SAP, so we are creating outbound delivery from the 122 document but the problem is SAP is expecting one to one customer for each vendor. In our case we want to maintain our third party as single customer and assign to all vendor. Is this possible and how to maintain it?
Thanks & Regards,
Venkatesh

you can use customer hierarchy functionality to over come this kind of situations.

Setting alv layout as defualt for all usres

Hi,
Is it possible to set the webdynpro alv layout set as default for all users.
I need your input if this is possible in WD ABAP ALV setting.
Thanks in advance !
Alok

I found the answer to my question on my own by just digging into the options available in ALV.
Thanks,
Alok

How to create one Oprations button (Create Button Or CreateInsert Button )for all master And Detail block?

hi
I have master And Detail with 4 level ,I want to have on operations button for all block in data control .
(similar to Oracle form toolbar)
how to do it ?

Well, if you tell us your jdev version and what exactly you try to do, without just telling us 'as in forms' we might be able to help.
Most of us don't know how it's done in forms. So be specific when you describe your use case.
Timo

Upload using eCATT to change fax number for all existing Vendors

Dear All,
Using eCATT upload, i need to change the Fax number format for all existing vendors. How to do this?
I havent used eCATT before, please guide me in this regard
Thanks
RS
Edited by: Ramapuram Saravanan on Feb 8, 2009 6:13 AM

Hi Luis,
Use tcode XK99 for vendor mass change, select the Fax no field. You have to take note that this changes will be only 1 fax number for all vendors.
Else you have to use BAPI for mass change.
regards,
maia

Output message type triggering for all

Hi,
I want the output messages to be triggered for particular Vendor and doc type with ALE config.
Now the config is such tht whenever the PO is created for doc type, the output type gets triggered for ALE partner .
So need guidance.
Thanks

hi,
Please check whether the access sequence attached to your Condition type has a condition table with Document type and vendor field, if not then you can add one or create a new Access sequence and attach it to you condition type.
Next you maintain the Condition Records for the doc type and vendor combination, and the system shall trigger the message type automatically.

Balance Confirmation Report for multiple vendors

Hi all,
I have developed report in FI which gives details about opening balance,fiscal year, document number, posting date and amount in the output.In selection screen I am passing single values of fiscal year(GJAHR), vendor(LIFNR) and company code(BUKLRS). This report is working fine for single vendor but now I need to change it for multiple vendors. I tried but not getting desired result in the output.
Following is code for single vendor in selection screen.
SORT t_bsikbsak BY bukrs belnr gjahr buzei.
LOOP AT t_bsikbsak.
    t_pre_bal-netpr = t_bsikbsak-dmbtr.
    t_pre_bal-sgtxt = 'Opening Balance'.
    IF t_bsikbsak-shkzg EQ 'H'.
      t_pre_bal-netpr = t_pre_bal-netpr * -1.
    ENDIF.
    COLLECT t_pre_bal.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT t_pre_bal.
    itab-netpr = t_pre_bal-netpr.
    itab-sgtxt = t_pre_bal-sgtxt.
    APPEND itab.
ENDLOOP.
SORT t_bseg BY bukrs belnr gjahr buzei.
CLEAR itab.
LOOP AT t_bseg.
    ON CHANGE OF t_bseg-bukrs OR t_bseg-belnr OR t_bseg-gjahr.
      READ TABLE t_bkpf WITH KEY bukrs = t_bseg-bukrs
                               belnr = t_bseg-belnr
                               gjahr = t_bseg-gjahr.
      IF sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
        itab-budat = t_bkpf-budat.
        itab-belnr = t_bkpf-belnr.
        itab-gjahr = t_bkpf-gjahr.
      ENDIF.
    ENDON.
    IF t_bseg-koart = 'K' AND t_bseg-lifnr = s_lifnr.
      itab-sgtxt = t_bseg-sgtxt.
     READ TABLE t_bsak WITH KEY bukrs = t_bseg-bukrs
                                belnr = t_bseg-belnr
                                gjahr = t_bseg-gjahr.
      IF t_bseg-shkzg EQ 'H'.
        t_bseg-dmbtr = t_bseg-dmbtr * -1.
      ENDIF.
      itab-netpr = itab-netpr + t_bseg-dmbtr.
    ELSEIF t_bseg-hkont = '0044100040'. " G/L for INTEREST EXPENSES
      itab-inamt = t_bseg-dmbtr.
    ELSEIF t_bseg-hkont = '0012300060'. " G/L for TDS ON INTEREST
      itab-tdamt = t_bseg-dmbtr.
    ENDIF.
    AT END OF bukrs.
      append_flag = 'X'.
    ENDAT.
    AT END OF belnr.
      append_flag = 'X'.
    ENDAT.
    AT END OF gjahr.
      append_flag = 'X'.
    ENDAT.
    IF append_flag = 'X'.
      APPEND itab.
      CLEAR itab.
      CLEAR : append_flag.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Closing Balance
LOOP AT itab.
    t_temp-netpr = itab-netpr.
    t_temp-sgtxt = 'Closing Balance'.
    COLLECT t_temp.
ENDLOOP.
CLEAR itab.
LOOP AT t_temp.
    itab-netpr = t_temp-netpr.
    itab-sgtxt = 'Closing Balance'.
    APPEND itab.
ENDLOOP.
Kindly provide some input how to do it for multiple vendors in same code otherwise provide some suggestions for new code.
Thanks in Advance.waiting for response.
Thanks & Regards,
Harshada Patil

Hi,
Thanks for quick response.Following is the structure of internal tables which I am using in this program.
TYPES : BEGIN OF ty_bsikbsak ,
        bukrs TYPE bsik-bukrs,
        lifnr TYPE bsik-lifnr,
        umsks TYPE bsik-umsks,
        umskz TYPE bsik-umskz,
        augdt TYPE bsik-augdt,
        augbl TYPE bsik-augbl,
        gjahr TYPE bsik-gjahr,
        belnr TYPE bsik-belnr,
        buzei TYPE bsik-buzei,
        zuonr TYPE bsik-zuonr,
        shkzg TYPE bsik-shkzg,
        dmbtr TYPE bsik-dmbtr,
        END OF ty_bsikbsak.
TYPES : BEGIN OF ty_bkpf ,
        bukrs TYPE bkpf-bukrs,
        belnr TYPE bkpf-belnr,
        gjahr TYPE bkpf-gjahr,
        bldat TYPE bkpf-bldat,
        budat TYPE bkpf-budat,
        stblg TYPE bkpf-stblg,
        stjah TYPE bkpf-stjah,
        END OF ty_bkpf.
TYPES : BEGIN OF ty_bseg ,
        bukrs TYPE bseg-bukrs,
        belnr TYPE bseg-belnr,
        gjahr TYPE bseg-gjahr,
        buzei TYPE bseg-buzei,
        koart TYPE bseg-koart,
        shkzg TYPE bseg-shkzg,
        dmbtr TYPE bseg-dmbtr,
        sgtxt TYPE bseg-sgtxt,
        hkont TYPE bseg-hkont,
        lifnr TYPE bseg-lifnr,
        END OF ty_bseg.
DATA : t_bsik     TYPE TABLE OF ty_bsikbsak WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA : t_bsak     TYPE TABLE OF ty_bsikbsak WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA : t_bsikbsak TYPE TABLE OF ty_bsikbsak WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA : t_bkpf     TYPE TABLE OF ty_bkpf     WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA : t_bkpf2    TYPE TABLE OF ty_bkpf     WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA : wa_bkpf    TYPE ty_bkpf     .
DATA : t_bseg     TYPE TABLE OF ty_bseg     WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: BEGIN OF t_pre_bal OCCURS 0,
      netpr TYPE bseg-dmbtr,
      sgtxt TYPE bseg-sgtxt,
      lifnr TYPE bseg-lifnr,
      END OF t_pre_bal.
DATA: t_pre_bal1 LIKE t_pre_bal.
DATA: BEGIN OF t_temp OCCURS 0,
      netpr TYPE bseg-dmbtr,
      sgtxt TYPE bseg-sgtxt,
      lifnr TYPE bseg-lifnr,
      END OF t_temp.
DATA: BEGIN OF itab OCCURS 0,
      gjahr LIKE bsik-gjahr,
      belnr LIKE bsik-belnr,
      budat LIKE bkpf-budat,
      sgtxt LIKE bseg-sgtxt,
      lifnr LIKE lfa1-lifnr,
      netpr LIKE bseg-dmbtr, " Net Amount
      inamt LIKE bseg-dmbtr, " Interest Amount
      tdamt LIKE bseg-dmbtr, " TDS Amount
      END   OF itab.
RANGES: r_budat FOR bkpf-budat.
I have Included vendor(LIFNR) in all these structures.Now I am using three internal tables to hold opening balance, Closing balance and line item accounting documents from bseg table respectively.here, I need to collect all these three internal tables into one internal table according to vendor(LIFNR) with it's opening balance, accounting documents and closing balance. can anyone guide me through this so that I can collect all these three internal tables into single one.
Thanks & Regards,
Harshada Patil
Edited by: Harshada.up on Feb 15, 2011 9:33 AM

How scores distributed in equal weightage for all subcriteria in vendoreval

Dear all,
Kindly tell me how the scores are distributed in vendor evaluation for all the sub criterias.. like for price level , price behaviour
because in ME63 output I got 40,40 always but for some vendor i got 45,46 like this ... what is the reason for that and how exactly it is configured. kindly give the details
Regards,
Saurav

Have you follow all this checking ?
If you think that you already follow all the steps, but the value is not as per your config, you can raise ticket to SAP about it.
But I suggest you to double check your computation.
To determine a vendor's price level, the system compares the vendor's effective price with the market price for the material.
   1. The system first checks whether the buyer has maintained a market price for the material or the material group.
   2. If not, the system calculates the market price which is equal to the average of the effective prices for all vendors supplying this material. Prices from purchase orders and prices for subcontracting are dealt with separately.
   3. The system then applies the effective price for the vendor from the conditions.
   4. The vendor's effective price is then compared with the market price and the percentage variance determined.
   5. The system then assigns a score to the variance in accordance with the settings made in Customizing.
   6. This score is valid for the material, that is, at info record level. Since the score the vendor receives for a subcriterion is based not on an individual material, but on the total of all the materials he supplies, the following steps are necessary:
   7. The system repeats the comparison between effective price and market price for each of the vendor's materials.
   8. The system calculates an average from the sum of the scores determined. This average represents the vendor's score for the subcriterion Price Level.
Edited by: w1n on Apr 19, 2010 2:35 PM

Submit a program and skip output or dont show the output (alv list)

hi,
is it possible to use the submit command and skip output or don't show the output (alv list) ?
Regrads
ertas

Hi all,
I get the message
REPORT ZTEST.
DATA: jtab TYPE TABLE OF sbook,
      wa_jtab LIKE LINE OF jtab,
      jtab2 TYPE z_incident_li OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
submit Z_INCIDENT_LIST EXPORTING LIST TO MEMORY AND RETURN.
IMPORT lt_incident_res TO jtab2 FROM MEMORY ID 'table'.
LOOP AT jtab2 .
WRITE / jtab2-RECN.
ENDLOOP.
Runtime Errors         RAISE_EXCEPTION
Date and Time          12.06.2008 17:54:00
Short text
     Exception condition "CNTL_ERROR" raised.
What happened?
     The current ABAP/4 program encountered an unexpected
     situation.
Error analysis
     A RAISE statement in the program "CL_GUI_CONTROL================CP" rais
      exception
     condition "CNTL_ERROR".
     Since the exception was not intercepted by a superior
     program, processing was terminated.
     Short description of exception condition:
     For detailed documentation of the exception condition, use
     Transaction SE37 (Function Library). You can take the called
     function module from the display of active calls.

Vendor Reconciliation account change for specific vendor

Hi All,
Client want to change the Reconciliation account in the Vendor Master but same reconciliation account assign to multiple vendor master but client want to change specific vendor not for all vendor . The vendor has postings to it right now. We want that all the existing postings should be transferred to the new recon account line item wise and the new postings will go to the new recon account.
Please suggest some approach so that this can be effected.
Regards,
Dev

Hi Debabrata ,
To clear the reconciliation Account one option is that you create a new open item managed GL Account and use Transaction FB05 to clear each open item in the Vendor Account one at a Time and post on the new open item clearing Account. Then change the reconciliation Account in the master data and then again use FB05 to post the transactions back on the Vendor Account one at a time,
As far as impact on Balance sheet is concerned, there should not be an impact except that the balance will be reflected in a different GL Account.
Thanks
Muthu

For All Entries is NOT better than INNER JOIN in most cases

I quote from Siegfried Boes' excellent post here: Will writing an inner join be better or creating a view?
For all the FOR ALL ENTRIES lovers ... there is no proof for these reappearing recommendation.
There is nearly nobody who receives forum points, who recommends FOR ALL ENTRIES instead of Joins. What is the reason ???
It is easier to prove the opposite. A Join is a nested loop inside the database, a FOR ALL ENTRIES is partly outside of the database. FOR ALL ENTRIES works in blocks, joins on totals.
FOR ALL ENTRIES are not recommded on really large tables, because the chances are too high that
too many records are transferred.
People prefer FOR ALL ENTRIES, because JOINs are not so easy to understand. Joins can go wrong, but with a bit of understanding they can be fixed.
Some Joins are slow and can not be fixed, but then the FOR ALL ENTRIES would be extremely slow.
There are several kinds of views:
- projection views, i.e. only one table involved just fields reduced
- join views, several tables, joins conditions stored in dictionary
- materialized views, here the joined data are actually stored in the database. Storing and synchronisation has to be done manually.
Only the last one creates real overhead. It should be the exception.
Join Views and Joins are nearly identical. The view is better for reuse. The join is better in complicated, becuase if the access goes wrong, it can often be fixed by adding a hint. Hints can not be added to views.
Abraham Bukit points out:
If it is cluster table, (you can't use join). If it is buffered table, I would also say avoid join.
If they all are transaction table which are not buffered and are not cluster tables.
He further supports Siegfried's statement that FAE is easier to undestand than INNER JOINs.
Thomas Zloch says, regarding buffered tables:
At least think twice, maybe compare runtimes if in doubt.
So, unless someone has some EVIDENCE that FOR ALL ENTRIES is better, I don't think we want to see this discussed further.
Kind regards
Matt

To give food for thought here's an example I gave in a thread:
If you have a statement like
SELECT ... FOR ALL ENTRIES IN FAE_itab WHERE f = FAE_itab-f.
SAP sends it to the database depending how the parameter rsdb/prefer_union_all is set:
rsdb/prefer_union_all = 0 =>
SELECT ... WHERE f = FAE_itab[1]-f
          OR    f = FAE_itab[2]-f
          OR    f = FAE_itab[N]-f
You have some influence of the generated statement type: Instead of OR'ed fields an IN list can be used
if you have only a single coulmn N to compare:
rsdb/prefer_in_itab_opt parameter:
SELECT ... WHERE f IN (itab[1]-f, itab[2]-f, ..., itab[N]-f)
rsdb/prefer_union_all = 1 =>
SELECT ... WHERE f = FAE_itab[1]-f
UNION ALL SELECT ... WHERE f = FAE_itab[2]-f
UNION ALL SELECT ... WHERE f = FAE_itab[N]-f
see: Note 48230 - Parameters for the SELECT ... FOR ALL ENTRIES statement
As you can see for the 2nd parameter several statements are generated and combined with a UNION ALL,
the first setting generates statements with OR's (or uses IN if possible) for the entries in FAE_itab.
I give you a little example here (my parameters are set in a way that the OR's are translated to IN lists; i traced the execution in ST05)
Select myid into table t_tabcount from mydbtable
for all entries in t_table    " 484 entries
    where myid = t_table-myid .
ST05 trace:
|Transaction SEU_INT|Work process no 0|Proc.type DIA|Client 200|User |
|Duration |Obj. name |Op.    |Recs.|RC    |Statement|
| 640|mydbtable |PREPARE|   | 0|SELECT WHERE "myid" IN ( :A0 , :A1 , :A2 , :A3 , :A4 ) AND "myid" = :A5|
| 2|mydbtable |OPEN   |   | 0|SELECT WHERE "myid" IN ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) AND "myid" = 72 |
| 2.536|mydbtable |FETCH |    0| 1403|   |
| 3|mydbtable |REOPEN |   | 0|SELECT WHERE "myid" IN ( 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ) AND "myid" = 72 |
| 118|mydbtable |FETCH | 0| |
| 2|mydbtable |REOPEN | | 0|SELECT WHERE "myid" IN ( 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ) AND "myid" = 72     |
| 3|mydbtable |REOPEN | | 0|SELECT WHERE "myid" IN ( 475 , 476 , 477 , 478 , 479 ) AND "myid" = 72 |
| 94|mydbtable |FETCH | 0| 1403|   |
| 2|mydbtable |REOPEN |   | 0|SELECT WHERE "myid" IN ( 480 , 481 , 482 , 483 , 484 ) AND "myid" = 72 |
You see the IN list contained 5 entries each , wich made up about 97 statements for all 484 entries.
For every statment you have a single fetch operation wich means a separate access to the database.
If you would replace the FAE with a join you would only have one fetch to the database.
With the example above we can derive these observations:
1. From database point of view these settings kill performance when you access a big table and/or have a lot of entries or columns in your FAE_itab. Furthermore, you hide information what data you will access
at all and thus you block the database from creating a more efficient execution plan because it DOESN'T KNOW wich data you will select in the next step. I.e. it may be more efficient to scan the table in one shot instead of having many index accesses - but the database can make this decision only if it can examine ONE statement that has ALL the information of what data to retrieve.
2. A second impact is that with every statement execution you trigger the allocation of database resources
wich will contribute to the overhead described above.
Said that, FAE can never be a replacement for joining big tables (think of having a table with thousands of records in a FAE table )
Edited by: kishan P on Nov 2, 2010 2:16 PM - Format Fixed

Reg:Single Check for Multiple Vendors

Hi Experts,
I want to Issue a Single check for all vendor open items...
For this is I created one Group Key and assigned in the vendor master record, but while doing the payment separate check issuing for each vendor,
any idea

Hi,
Can you check the below thread of urs.
[Reg:Single Check for Multiple Vendors]
In addition to the above, please make sure that in OBVU, the check box separate payment for each ref is deselected for your questioned comapny code.
You would have continued your earlier thread instead, rather than a new thread.
Thanks,
Srinu

Output ALV format as FBL1N For all Vendors as indidual block

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for