P.O's should be proposed altrnatively for two vendors
Hai
Material A is being procured from two approved vendors. System should not allow other than the approved vendors.
And system should propose both vendors alternatively when ever i raise p.o manually
EX:-
For the 1st P.O -- 1st vendor
2nd P.O -- 2nd vendor
3rd P.O -- 1st vendor
4th P.O -- 2nd vendor and so on..
Does quantity has a bearing/significant impact on this scenario?
Hi,
As per your requriment the s/m will not propse the vendor say 1 first creatrion 2 for next creation.............but instead of this you define a fixed quota for vendore for procuremenmt so that you can procure as per the quota defined...........
Try with Quota arrangement,
Similar Messages
-
Inspection lot should be created only for particular vendor
Hi
Can anyone please help in achieving the below scenario:
*Material has been assigned to the inspection type A (one time inspection) has been set as preffered and active in the inspection set up in the material master.
*Quality level has been created for material and vendor such that inspection should be carried out when next stage is 1 and no inspection should carried out when next stage is 2.
*Tasklist has been assigned with material and vendor .
Material can be supplied by different vendors,For this material, inspection should be done only for one vendor and for other vendors there should not be any inspection to be done and no inspection lot should be created.i.e Inspection lot should be created only for one vendor say AA whereas now inspection lot is getting created when goods receipt is done for the purchase order with other vendor BB.
My requirement is the inspection lot should not be created when goods receipt is done with other vendors say BB except AA.
Is there any other way other than using quality info record to achieve this.
I can try with DMR but the thing is there should not be inspection lot created while posting GR.
can anyone suggest me any other way to achieve this requirement.There are user exits when you create an inspection lot. One of those could be used to suppress the inspection lot. Have you looked at these? Have you researched any QM user exits yourself yet? This isn't the first time this specific question has been asked over the years.
It's not hard and there are lists of QM user exits available all over the internet.
Please do some research.
You can also assign vendors to inspection plans with a DMR that requires one inspection, and than after that creates all skip lot inspections which you automatically close by a batch job. The first lot can be manually forced closed. Thereaftter all receipts would be skipped. Not 100% but pretty darn close. This requires that you know which vendors to assign to which plan. Probably as much data maintenance as maintaing the Q-info records.
And yes.. your client needs to come up with better reasons than "I don't wanna..". It's part of a consultants job to convince them.
Craig -
Single Check created for two Vendor invoices via RFFOUS_C
Hi All
We run the program RFFOUS_C to generate check printing, our requirement is to print a single check for each invoice to a vendor. So if two invoices require payment, then two checks created.
The system generates two Check numbers which can be seen in F110. However when reviewing the file, only one check number is printed against both invoices.
Where else should I be looking for a setting that determines the check payments?
Regards
GurpritHi,
In the vendor master, company code data, payment transaction tab, there is a setting for individual payment. If this is checked, a separate payment will be made for each invoice.
There may be other solutions but this one is very simple.
Hope this helps.
Alicia -
Same RFQ for two Vendors.
Dear Experts,
I have created a RFQ and in the vendor adress i have given the vendor Number.Now if i want the same RFQ to be sent to two vendors then how can i do it.
Kind Regards
SajidDear,
1. You create an RFQ either manually or by referencing an already existing RFQ, requisition, or outline purchase agreement.
2. You specify which vendors are to receive the RFQ. A separate document is then created for each addressee.
3. You enter the prices and conditions set out in the quotation submitted by the vendor into the RFQ document.
4. You carry out a comparative appraisal of several vendor quotations by means of the price comparison list.
The individual quotations are compared item by item. The mean value quotation represents the average value of the individual quotes.
5. You can save the most favorable quotation in an info record and send rejection letters to unsuccessful bidders.
6. You can monitor the status of follow-on activities relating to the RFQ and quotation (e.g. a contract is set up or a purchase order issued).
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
Printout amount showing differently for two vendors of same group
hi ,
i am facing a problem . we have two imported vendors created on 2004 belongs to same vendor group.
order currency for both vendors is : USD.
when we give print out for PO,
for one vendor it is giving as :12,200.00 USD
for another vendor it is showing as :13.500,00 USD
i want to make both the vendors in same notation .
can any one suggest where diference in settings is .
rgds
Chalamhi Simha,
this could be controlled by the country of the vendors, pls. have a look which countries are assigend. In transaction OY01 you can check the country settings for decimals and thousands.
hope this helps
ec -
F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor
Hello,
Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
I understand that there are two places:
FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
Thanks everyone.Ravi,
Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
Comments please? -
Avoiding creation of inspection lot for certain vendors.
Hi,
There is one requirement from my client side , that Inspection lot should not be created for certain vendors ( Issuing plant also consider as vendor here).
The correct requirement is if it is transfered from other plants it should not create the lot and on the other vendors it should create.
We have a have a option through maintaining the QM info record but it was not maintained earlier and newly creation is too difficult.
I remember there is some exit is available to overcome this. Any one having the earlier experince on this...Provide the exit and FM name... High priority one.
Regards
PragashDear Pragash
1) You can maintain Quality info Record in enmass using QI06. Only maintain for the vendor you need to skip.
2) This exit can help you in controling the inspection lot
QAAT0002 Control of acceptance lots/goods receipt
QBCK0003 Extended QM check for goods receipt
Regards
Gajesh -
Payment Proposal F110 for vendors
Dear experts,
Here is my requirement. A batch job should be scheduled to create a payment proposal. As soon as a proposal created, it should be routed to an approver via workflow to view the proposal and proceed further to run the payments.
We have about 20 company codes and only one company will be making a payment from only one bank account. We have about 4 different payment methods and few invoice document types. My questions are
is it best practice to schedule a payment proposal via a batch job?? i have seen people running the proposal manually..
1) Are there any standard workflows or user exits available to trigger when a proposal is created
2) What will be the best practice to give a logic to trigger a workflow? When we create a proposal, table REGUH will be updated for each payment document. So, if I ask workflow to look in reguh table for all payment runs on today's date and create a work item for all of the line item?
3) The reviewer will have only display access to the proposal once they click on work item in the workflow. So they would hit the display proposal icon to view the details.
3) I have only worked with four company codes based off four different countries. but, in this scenario we have sereral company codes for one country. what is the best practice to schedule a proposal for all company codes and payment methods at the same time? if i do this, i will have multiple payment programs and a variant for each payment program. I'm concerned about producing DME and postive pay file at single shot.. or by company code and payment method, if I do this the reviewer have to look at the proposal by payment method
4)I'm unable to run proposal without entering vendor numbers parameters screen AND additional log screen. How can I bypass this and jsut run for all vendor in those comopany codes? I have documen type in free selection. If I don't give vendor number in either of these two places, I will get a message that no accounts have been selected yet.
Please helpHi,
Please check transaction : F110S
Here you have various options to schedule the proposal and payment with different comapny codes and payment methods.
Please read the program documentation for further processing.
Rgds
Murali. N -
Sourcing: Propose sources for selected items
Hi
I am running SRM 7.0 in classic scenario - for now in a demo environment. I try to figure out how the sourcing work if I have contracts.
I creates a central service contract in SRM. This is not replicated to backend at the moment but do it have to be replicated to backend to be proposed as source for my shopping cart in the sourcing cockpit?
I have created a contract in backend (and only in backend) and this is visible in "Propose sources for selected items"
Another issue I have is in the following process.
1. A user creates a SC with a service item (text item)
2. This goes to Purchasers worklist
3. Purchaser creates RFx and select bidders
4. The bidders respond
5. The Purchaser select the best offer and creates a contract.
6. The SC is not possible to order anymore so the Purchaser creates a copy of the original SC (on behalf of the user who create the SC in the first place).
7. I expect that the contract I created in bullet 5 would be proposed as source of supply in the new SC but it isn´t :-(
I therefore wondering if it is because the contracts is not replicated to backend at the moment?
Note:
I order a text service item and I have filled the Supplier Part number in both the contract and SC but this do not help.
Hope anyone can help meHello,
If you are using classic scenario, only backend contracts will be proposed as SOS.
This means that if you create a central contract in SRM, it should be replicated to ECC in order to be used as source of supply.
SRM contracts can be used as SOS only in case of extended classic and local scenarios.
Regards,
Ricardo -
E-Recruiting: "BAdI: Specify Proposal Texts for Postings" not working
Hi all,
we are implementing E-Recruiting 6.03 and I need to use the "BAdI: Specify Proposal Texts for Postings"
to fill some fields in Job Posting creation.
Even if I created the custom implementation, it is active and the fields are not hidden, the BADI code
seems to be ignored.
I should see the pushbuttons on the UI, but nothing....
Do you know if there are other specific settings for this BADI?
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards.
Angelo
Now I've seen in the code that the following check fails:
* Read default_texts if at leat one default option exists
IF me->show_default_buttons EQ true AND
me->default_texts_read EQ false .
Ok, the problem was due to the setting "example implementation" in the properties
of the BADI implementation.
Edited by: Angelo Scarnata on Aug 8, 2008 4:16 PMHello G Raj,
the BAdI you found is only for providing standard texts in the posting maintainence. If implemented it sets text you use again and again depending on requisition attibutes so the recruiter does not have to type in everything each time.
For the publication smartform, as for any other data overview, you do not change the standard you just replace the standard example by your company one. You start by copying the standard smartform to keep the correct interface (all e-recruiting smartforms are named HRRCF*) and changing to the layout you need. Then you set the smartform in IMG under SAP E-Recruiting -> Technical Settings -> User Interfaces -> Settings for User Interfaces with Business Server Pages (BSP) -> Assign Parameters to Parameter Types.
Best Regards
Roman Weise -
have family plan with 250 data which I almost use each month. Going on vacation and will be on the road for two weeks. Should I up my data for a month then change back. Is it worth it or should I just run over and pay the extra 15 per gig?
Hello mlazaretti. Vacation time is awesome. (Especially a road trip!) Since you will be going out for two weeks, you never know if having extra data may come in handy. I highly recommend switching to the next tier up so this way you have more data. This way it is only $10.00 more versus $15.00, and you dont have to worry about overages. Then change back at the start of the next billing cycle.
If you need help making this change let us know! Have a safe trip!
NicandroN_VZW
Follow us on twitter @VZWSupport -
In SAP BW landscape we should have separate servers for DEV, QA and PROD
Hi all,
In SAP BW system landscape we should have separate servers for DEV, QA and PROD.
whether one server is enough for DEV and we can use virtual servers to QA & PROD?
Regards,
chanduHi chandu,
In my previous Organisation we got exactly the same landscape for BW as you described.BCS(BAYER COPSCIENCE LTD) operates a BW System Landscape with one centralized Global Development System and three regional Quality Assurance and Production Systems located in Europe, Asia Pacific and Americas. This Landscape is to ensure consistent data models to be available in all regional systems as well as to minimize development efforts and make use of respective synergies.
This is perfectly working for BCS ,and I think, this is the most approriate way of handling of resources.
Regards
CSM Reddy -
The 90 day rule is ridiculous. It should be seriously reconsidered for paying apple customers with one account but several devices.
If you have only one account, then the 90 day rule should be of no consequence for you.
-
i use my apple id that i create it for my iphone 4 on my new iphone 5,then i want to activate the imessage but i can't.what should i do?i want to know i can't use one apple id for two iphone 4 & 5?
HI
I was trying to take my Mac air to factory default settings.
I've done all that it says in the documment i was following, and them during the process it asked me the APPLE ID.
I put the apple id i have in my iphone. But it's not the one... it's said that i don't have any OSX associated with it... so it can not install the OSX.
So what can i do? -
My 2008 Mac Pro is no longer recognizing memory in the B card. Is it simply a defective card or should I look elsewhere for an answer? It was working unntil sometime early this year. Thank you for any enlightenment you can provide.
I'm not sure I understand. You swapped the A and B modules. The B module does not show up in the A modules slot? That would indicate the module is bad. If the A module doesn't show up in the B module's slot, then the slot is bad.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Unable to open the Projects from Project center with the Alias name PWA 2010
Hi, I am unable to open the Projects from Project center with the Alias name with the server name i am able to open the projects, version is project server 2010, My system is ABC.DC.IN alias name i have given is DEF.AD.COM With the system name i
-
Just bought this ipad in June 2013 and then all of a sudden about two weeks ago, I discovered the machine reboots on its own and would only be active for less than 2 minutes. I check the auto-lock assigned minutes and it was set on 15 minutes even a
-
Adobe Reader - prints gibberis
Frequently when I print a pdf document - it will sometimes print what looks like Chinese or just machine language symbols. I can print the same document if I reload it once it was saved. Sometimes it will print the first page or so in proper Englis
-
Controlling Screen Resolution in BDCs
Hi, Can any one explain about the process for Controlling Screen Resolution in BDCs. Thanks & Regards, Rajesh.
-
How to have a creative p5800 working in 5.1 mode and microphone at the same time
pls, can somebody advise, how can i use my creative p5800 in 5.1 mode and at the same time to have microphone working properly. for the moment i have installed my creative as stereo speakers and the mic is plugged into the sound card, which is not ve