Pacman kernel version different from abs tree

I've started using Arch Linux since last week, switching from Ubuntu, and I must say, I'm impressed. I've been using Gentoo on another system for a while, and I wanted the power of Gentoo, without the compiling, which actually is what Arch is providing.
I've installed a i686 system, but I have 8Gb of memory so I've compiled my own kernel with HIGHMEM64G=yes.
When I updated my system today, I got a new kernel package from pacman: 3.1.3-1.
But when I rebuild my kernel using abs, I get 3.1.2-1.
Shouldn't these versions be the same? I've tried different mirrors to sync my abs tree, to no effect. Am I missing something?

Ok, thanks, then I know what's going on.
How can I use a 64bit kernel with a i686 install? That might be easier than recompiling my kernel each time. What about nvidia module and virtual box modules? I had to recompile these myself as well after I compiled my own kernel.
Sure, if I had to reinstall, I'd go 64bit all the way; though I now have my system full up and running and configured so I'm not really looking forward reinstalling right now. I chose i686 not for a particular reason, I just assumed there would be a pae enabled kernel, but unfortunately there isn't one in the official repositories.

Similar Messages

  • Agent version differs from LMService

    Hi ,
    I am connecting a NW 7.31 Java system with solman 7.1 SP10 with SMD diagnostic agent for Manage system config set up
    I have installed the SMD agent and connected with central SLD & solman.
    In the agent connectivity it can be seen that the diagnostic agent is in pending status with the message " 7.10.1.0.2011070611153 Agent version differs from LMService"
    what could be the reason and what is LMService here.
    The system kernel version is 720_EXT.
    Please guide and provide a solution
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Daniel,
    Can you check LM-Service SP and Patch level.
    Also Refer the guided process as per these 2 KBAs.
    1962333 - Responsibility of individual steps in transaction SOLMAN_SETUP
    1931100 - "Agent version differs from LMService" Error in Solution Manager 7.1 Agent Administration
    Divyanshu

  • Is the aperture 3 trial version different from the original?

    Hello,
    I am working on organizing my photos trying out the aperture 3 trial version. I'm thinking of getting the original one but before I actually organize my libraries I want to know if there are any differences I should know about that might affect my work launching the original version. Also, does the original work the same with the Duplicate Annihilator?
    Thanks in advance!

    The trial version is a fully functional version of Aperture. If you decide to continue on with it you can just authorize the trial copy once you get our key. The only difference is the name of the default library the trail and non-trial versions create. But you can always rename the library if you wish.
    All this applies to the CD version, if you eventually buy from the App Store I'm not sure what the procedure would be. But in any case the library created with the trial should be useable by the App Store version.
    One thing to keep in mind, if you add images to the trial version and use it then decide not to keep Aperture you'll be able to retrieve your master files but any changes made will be lost.

  • Why is the public Flash Player download version different from the SDLA download site?

    Since last month, FP 11.1.102.55 has been available for the public to download and install. But the http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/fp_distribution3.html still has 11.0.1.152.
    What gives?

    All downloads at http://www.adobe.com/special/products/flashplayer/fp_distribution3.html are 11.1.102.55
    Maybe you have a cache somewhere from where you still obtain an old cached version?

  • We have a Mac Book from 2007 System Version:     Mac OS X 10.4.11 (8S2167)   Kernel Version:     Darwin 8.11.1

    We have a mac book purchased in 2007 System Version:          Mac OS X 10.4.11 (8S2167) Kernel Version:          Darwin 8.11.1
    Which OS X version should we or can we upgrade to? 

    A retail 10.5 Leopard disk will run you over $200 since they haven't been made for over 4 years so they're getting pretty rare.
    The 10.6 Snow Leopard DVD is in the Apple online store. You can get it for $19.99. You will need to be running 10.6.8 to access the App Store to order Lion or Mountain Lion. http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC573/mac-os-x-106-snow-leopard
    You can upgrade from 10.4 straight to 10.6 with no problems as long as you have at least 1gb of RAM. Any program that runs under 10.4 should run under10.6. See this list for third party programs compatibility with 10.6: http://snowleopard.wikidot.com/  You might have to upgrade some drivers for printers, etc.... And you will have to install Rosetta if you have any Power PC applications 
    http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/snow_leopard_installing_rosetta/  
    I recently upgraded an older MacBook (Early 2006 model 1,1) straight from 10.4 to 10.6.
    Once you are at 10.6.8 if you want to upgrade further Lion is still available from Apple. You will have to call Apple Customer Care 1-800-692-7753 or 1-800-676-2775. to purchase it. Then within 3 days you will get an email with a code which you can use to download Lion from the App Store.  The price is $19.99.
    You must have at least a Late 2006 model 2,1 MacBook.
    Lion will require at least 2gb of RAM but really needs 4gb to run smoothly.
    As for third party programs see this list for compatibility with 10.7 http://roaringapps.com/apps:table
    Also Lion doesn't run any Power PC programs. To see if you have any Power PC programs go to the Apple in the upper left corner and select About This Mac, then click on More Info. When System Profiler comes up select Applications under Software. Then look under Kind to see if any of your applications are listed as Power PC. Universal and Intel will run under Lion.
      Before Mac switched to Intel processors in 2006 they used Power PC processors from 1994 to 2005. Power PC 601 through 604, G3, G4 and G5. Applications written for the Power PC processors need the application called Rosetta to run on Intel processors. This was part of the Operating System in 10.4 and 10.5 but was an optional install in 10.6. With 10.7 Lion Apple dropped all support for Power PC applications.
    First we need to know which one of the 9 different models of MacBook you have. To see which model you have go to the Apple in the upper left corner and select About This Mac, then click on More Info. When System Profiler comes up check the Model Identifier and post it back here.
    The model 2,1 (Mid 2007) can use 3gb of 200 pin 667mhz PC2-5300 RAM
    The model 3,1 (Late 2007) can use 6gb of 200 pin 667mhz PC2-5300 RAM

  • System won't boot - different kernel versions

    Hello everyone,
    I have just made full system upgrade and Icant bool the system -> can't mount /boot/efi because vfat filesystem is not known.
    I am using grub, I fixed it but the problem remains.
    I have found out that output of 'uname -r'  shows kernel version: 3.17.3-1-ARCH and 'pacman -Q | grep linux' shows linux 3.18.2-2. What should I do to load 3.18.2-2?
    I think that it is "the root" of my problem,isn't it? Can you help me please?

    Head_on_a_Stick wrote:
    Have you rebooted?
    If you still cannot boot (your post is a little unclear on this), use (arch-)chroot from the live .iso and post the output of:
    # parted -l
    lsblk -f
    Yes, reboot didn't help. Gonna chroot the system.

  • A very old package version is still in the ABS tree

    I wanted to add some compile-time options to the qemu package so I synced my local ABS tree and made a copy of the relevant PKGBUILD and its associated files:
    $ sudo abs
    $ cp -r /var/abs/extra/qemu/ ~/abs/local/
    However, I noticed that this particular qemu PKGBUILD is at version 1.4.2-2 whereas the qemu version available from the extra repo is currently at 1.5.1-2. 
    To be sure I wasn't mistaken, I synced my local abs tree twice and had someone else confirm that they too are seeing the qemu 1.4.2-2 PKGBUILD after updating his abs tree.
    Is this to be expected?  How often is the central ABS tree updated?

    WonderWoofy wrote:To add to the actual topic of the thread.  If you really need the updated pkgbuild (and any accompanying files), you can always use the packages web interface and follow the link to the git repo that holds all those stuffs.
    You need to be careful if there are versions of this package in testing and non-testing repos, as the web interface will point to the testing ones e.g. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/amule/ If you click 'Source Files' link in the top right and then view the PKGBUILD https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit … ages/amule you will see it is for version 10803-3, even though we wanted version 10803-2 from [extra].
    For amule, there shouldn't be a difference, but for some other packages, there might be: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=164759

  • Error occurred in deployment step 'Install app for SharePoint': The provided App differs from another App with the same version and product ID.

    I am facing this problem while start debugging the Provider-Hosted app through VS2013. I want to deploy the app with same version. So please let me know any solution
    to remove the app instance from office365 online, so that I can deploy the same app with same version on the specified "Developer Site".
    Note: If I change the version in AppManifesst.xml file then this problem/error gets resolved. But I want to deploy with the same version as
    per my business requirement.
    The actual error renders while I click to "Start" button of the Visual Studio 2013 to deploy the provider-hosted app, for the sake
    to deploying it on say "ABC" site collection (i.e. developer site). I work on office365 online. Therefore, request you to please provide the solution for SharePoint online office 365. The occurrences is:
    "Error occurred in deployment step 'Install app for SharePoint': The provided App differs from another App with the
    same version and product ID."
    Please assist me anyone. It will be so kind of you.....
    Naveen Kumar
    Steria India Ltd.

    Did you updated the  AppManifest.xml file
    and change the version.
    If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

  • I talked to your guys yesterday about installing correct version of Lightroom 5 which I legally owned, and your guy provided me a download link (different from Creative cloud account), but somehow it was for Windows version not for Mac version. I would ve

    I talked to your guys yesterday about installing correct version of Lightroom 5 which I legally owned, and your guy provided me a download link (different from Creative cloud account), but somehow it was for Windows version not for Mac version. I would very much like to download a Mac version, so please send my correct web link. By the way my s. number for Lightroom 5 up is [removed], and I also have s.number for 4 up and 3 full.

    The latest non-CC version of LR 5 is 5.7.1 and download links are available on the Adobe Updates page:
    http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates/
    Both Mac and Win links are there.
    If you are asking for a LR 5 CC link, which wouldn't require a serial number, please be more clear about that.

  • Content Transfer - M version is different from A version

    Hi All,
    I am new to BI 7.0 and when i am trying to transfer some cubes from the Bi content to the infoarea; though the cubes are getting transffered successfully but i am getting the message that " M version is different from A version". Does this message makes any difference on the functionality of the cube??
    Also all the infoobjects of the cube are in a Inactive status. Please provide a solution to it.
    Thanks and regards,
    Ankur Agarwal

    A Version - Active version
    D version - SAP delivery version
    M version - Modified version
    Here is a link that describes BI Content Versions:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/80/1a66d5e07211d2acb80000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Message was edited by: Newbie
            Newbie

  • Modified version is differant from active for ds in test system

    Modified version is differant from active version in test system for ds 0FI_AA_12 (unequal sign close to ds).
    Once I try to load data to PSA , the system generates the following error :
    ds is not replicated
    I replicated ds many times , re-transported it but nothing helps

    Hi,
    After you replicate the datasource,it will become inactive and so you need to activate it again.
    Always replicate first and then activate.
    Hope it clarifies

  • The version of the LabVIEW NI SoftMotion Module installed on the host differs from the version installed on the RT target.

    Hi,
    i got this problem when i want to deploy the project with softmotion 
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/at9r9w667i00qja/qqqqqq.png
    NI SoftMotion:  The version of the LabVIEW NI SoftMotion Module installed on the host differs from the version installed on the RT target. 

    Hi Eng.Tareq
    It would be better if you can give more information
    1. What is the software version are you using?
    2. What is your target hardware?
    You can check the above information by open MAX -> under software tab of both computer and you target
    I suspect that the software version of your host computer and the target is difference as state in the picture attached.
    TuiTui

  • [SOLVED] Compiling kernel PKGBUILD from ABS (2.6.34)

    So I'm currently compiling a kernel from ABS, and its been running som docbook stuff for 2-3 hours now which I've never seen before when compiling a kernel with ABS.
    I commented out the line that allowed me to edit the config with make menuconfig. I tweaked the kernel to 1000hz and set up my cpu family.
    Is this normal? Im pretty sure this didnt happen when I compiled 2.6.33.4 from ABS
    This is what its been spamming for the past ~2 hours:
    Note: Writing struct_usb_host_ss_ep_comp.9
    Warn: meta author : no refentry/info/author struct usb_host_endpoint
    Note: meta author : see http://docbook.sf.net/el/author struct usb_host_endpoint
    Warn: meta author : no author data, so inserted a fixme struct usb_host_endpoint
    Note: Writing struct_usb_host_endpoint.9
    Warn: meta author : no refentry/info/author struct usb_interface
    Note: meta author : see http://docbook.sf.net/el/author struct usb_interface
    Warn: meta author : no author data, so inserted a fixme struct usb_interface
    Note: Writing struct_usb_interface.9
    Warn: meta author : no refentry/info/author struct usb_interface_cache
    Note: meta author : see http://docbook.sf.net/el/author struct usb_interface_cache
    Warn: meta author : no author data, so inserted a fixme struct usb_interface_cache
    Last edited by XAM (2010-06-29 06:19:50)

    Coacher wrote:Since 2.6.34 there is also kernel26-manpages and kernel26-docs packages that also placed in kernel26 PKGBUILD.
    I've never compiled that docs stuff for myself so cant say how long it takes, but if you need only new kernel26 package you can safely wipe out that lines from PKGBUILD.
    wow, thats good to hear. Took ages compiling with it there.

  • Why the different Kernel version?

    While I am trying to figure out why my G4 X Serve cannot connect to the Intel X Server as an OD Replica, I noticed although the two are running the exact same version (10.5.4-build 9E17) of software, the Kernel versions are different: G4 - Darwin 9.4, Intel - Darwin 9.0.
    Is this normal? And if it isn't, how to correct this? Thanks for any tips.

    Well I guess you could use chgrp on a symlink, but only to protect the symlink itself which is pointless here as it's root:root anyway, and why wouldn't you just use root:root on symlinks you don't want users to tamper with?  If you do manage to think of an occasion where you need to change the ownership of symlinks you could use chgrp...
    EDIT/ Doh even that is useless as you can't really protect symlinks as AFAIK permission will be set by parent directory...
    Also, if the /dev/cdrom symlink did manage to disappear it would just be recreated on the next boot by systemd/udev!
    Last edited by Meyithi (2013-02-07 19:02:00)

  • Compiling updated kernel version

    In another thread, I found out that a fix for my cardbus problems had been put in the kernel's git tree (changeset 02caa56e), which has been in mainline long enough to be in 2.6.35-rc6. The other thread's author mentioned manually updating the kernel source. I searched the wiki for information on how to do so, and mostly the information I found was just on how to compile a kernel with patches or a customized config.
    After some more research, I concluded that the most likely course of action would be to copy the kernel26 directory from my ABS tree, change the version from '2.6.34' to '2.6.35-rc6', and just makepkg and pacman -U, then update my GRUB entry. However, the kernel26 PKGBUILD is quite complex. (And even if it wasn't, I would still like confirmation before doing something this important.) Does anyone have instructions on how to install this kernel (or at least a kernel with that changeset)?

    With a bit of extra research (and if the fix is a patch that applies cleanly to 2.6.34.x code) you could also just rebuild that one module that you need (if it's one module). It is possible to build kernel modules separately and re-integrate them into the installed kernel's module tree after that.
    If I'm not mistaken most modules have separate Makefiles themselves. This link has an example on how to do it.

Maybe you are looking for