Pacman-key --edit-key without any TTY

Hi, I want to enable package signing on my vServer.
The problem is there is no TTY available.
# LANG=C pacman-key --edit-key 0x6AC6A4C2 ...
gpg: cannot open tty `/dev/tty': No such file or directory
==> ERROR: The key identified by 0x6AC6A4C2 could not be edited.
After adding "no-tty" to gpg.conf:
gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't get input
==> ERROR: The key identified by 0x6AC6A4C2 could not be edited.
Please help me to solve this.
Thanks
- Radioactiveman

I have copied the gnupg directory from my PC to the server but that should be just a workaround.
Does nobody have an idea?

Similar Messages

Sudden prompt for Bitlocker key without Any Hardware, Bios or Software Changes

Hi
My 3 Dell Windows 7 Enterprise laptops suddenly prompted me for a Bit locker key with out any changes made to them. I just wanted to find the root cause of the issue as I made no changes to the laptop. Looking at the Microsoft page for Bitlocker failures
found nothing that might have caused the bitlocker recovery key prompt. One of the three laptops I had in my draw and haven't turned on for few months until yesterday.
Only common thing between the laptops they were all encrypted about the same time a year ago and until now I have never been prompted for the bit locker recovery key.
Looking through the system logs I found the two error messages below on all three laptops.
Event id - 24635
General - Bootmgr failed to obtain the BitLocker volume master key from the TPM because the PCRs did not match.
Details
System
Provider
[ Name]
Microsoft-Windows-BitLocker-Driver
[ Guid]
{651DF93B-5053-4D1E-94C5-F6E6D25908D0}
EventID
24635
Version
0
Level
2
Task
0
Opcode
0
Keywords
0x8000000000000000
TimeCreated
[ SystemTime]
2014-01-21T08:15:55.932006100Z
EventRecordID
50445
Correlation
Execution
[ ProcessID]
4
[ ThreadID]
52
Channel
System
Computer
FT-WL25662.FTROOT.com
Security
[ UserID]
S-1-5-18
EventData
ErrorCode
0xc0280018
Volume
C:
WritePhase
0x0
VolumeGUID
{43C5A384-AC50-4017-9B84-DB1B1448041C}
OptionalGUID
{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}
Flags
Event id - 24636
General - Bootmgr failed to obtain the BitLocker volume master key from the TPM.
Details
+
System
Provider
[ Name]
Microsoft-Windows-BitLocker-Driver
[ Guid]
{651DF93B-5053-4D1E-94C5-F6E6D25908D0}
EventID
24636
Version
0
Level
2
Task
0
Opcode
0
Keywords
0x8000000000000000
TimeCreated
[ SystemTime]
2014-01-21T08:15:55.932006100Z
EventRecordID
50446
Correlation
Execution
[ ProcessID]
4
[ ThreadID]
52
Channel
System
Computer
FT-WL25662.FTROOT.com
Security
[ UserID]
S-1-5-18
EventData
ErrorCode
0xc0280018
Volume
C:
WritePhase
0x0
VolumeGUID
{43C5A384-AC50-4017-9B84-DB1B1448041C}
OptionalGUID
{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}
Flags
0x1500300
I can't find any useful information regarding these error logs so hoping someone here might be able to help me in find out the root cause of this issue.
Thanks

Hi,
Please update the BIOS to improve the stability for TPM.
I also would like to suggest you disable and enable BitLocker again to reset the settings, which may waste you a little time.
Andy Altmann
TechNet Community Support

FCC configuration in Sender File Channel Without any key field name

Hi Everyone,
We have below flat file generated from ECC using standard tcode.
The flat file is fixed length file and first record is header record followed by line items.
There is no key field name in the file name.
Can we read the file and convert into xml without any key field name?
I want to understand if the FCC configuration for above file can be done without key name or not.
Thanks,
Vertika

Hello,
AFAIK, using FCC i really doubt u can convert file into xml.
So technically, there are two options either read each line one by one and then do conversions in ur mapping or write a custom module which will read ur input file and convert into xml.
Configuring Generic Sender File CC Adapter
Thanks
Amit Srivastava

[SOLVED] Pacman Key Signing Strange Activity

Hi,
I was just setting up the package verification system with pacman when I noticed it was doing something unusual. When I ran:
pacman-key --init
instead of waiting for entropy, it just returned the prompt. Next, when I ran:
pacman-key --populate archlinux
it seemed to go through the entire signing process itself, stating that they didn't need to be signed again (sorry for the vagueness as I can't fetch exactly what it said by redirecting it into a file or something). The point is, usually I have to confirm each signature.
Is this normal?
Last edited by Mindstormscreator (2012-08-26 15:42:40)

Does the contents of /etc/pacman.d/gnupg look normal? You could compare that directory with the one on the live media (diff -rq) to test that theory.
When I set up package signing, I think I signed five master keys manually which I'd compared from two somewhat independent sources. After that, I don't remember having to *sign* any more signatures but only to confirm it was OK to import them. And now pacman seems to handle much of that automatically... But it is hard to imagine it would be meant to sign the master keys automatically since that would seem to undermine the point of having them in the first place.
On a fresh install, too, the init should take longer because so little is going on. (Hence all the threads here about it hanging because people haven't read the instructions for creating entropy .)

Circular: can't install libusb-compat for `pacman-key --init` [SOLVED]

So like a lot of people on here have upgraded to pacman 4.
I can't run `pacman-key --init` to update the keyring:
[stuart@myhost ~]$ sudo pacman-key --init
Password:
gpg: error while loading shared libraries: libusb-0.1.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
chmod: cannot access `/etc/pacman.d/gnupg/trustdb.gpg': No such file or directory
gpg: error while loading shared libraries: libusb-0.1.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
gpg: error while loading shared libraries: libusb-0.1.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
==> Updating trust database...
gpg: error while loading shared libraries: libusb-0.1.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
And because of signature issues can't install libusb-compat:
[stuart@myhost ~]$ sudo pacman -S libusb-compat
Password:
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (1): libusb-compat-0.1.3-2
Total Installed Size: 0.06 MiB
Net Upgrade Size: -0.02 MiB
Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
(1/1) checking package integrity [######################] 100%
warning: Public keyring not found; have you run 'pacman-key --init'?
error: GPGME error: Invalid crypto engine
error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature))
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
Last edited by Skipper_the_eye_child (2012-01-26 19:24:00)

That worked - thanks. It'd have helped had I remembered to write over pacman.conf of course! I've not done any mainentance for while, got a little rusty i'm afraid.
Last edited by Skipper_the_eye_child (2012-04-11 14:02:52)

[SOLVED] Can't sign key with pacman-key

I've been reading and digging all over the place but I can't seem to find anything on this.
1. I have created my own keys for signing packages that I want to put in a local repo so I don't have to compile the same package over and over on all my machines.
2. I have imported said key using sudo pacman-key --add rdjack21.pgp
3. Used sudo pacman-key --lsign rdjack21 I get this output:
-> Locally signing key rdjack21...
==> ERROR: rdjack21 could not be locally signed.
4. Ok so lets sudo pacman-key --edit rdjack21 output:
gpg> sign
pub rsa2048/3D1B5544
created: 2014-11-30 expires: never usage: SC
trust: ultimate validity: ultimate
Primary key fingerprint: B0D7 C728 31FA B2B0 6A3C 7086 DC7F DE0C 3D1B 5544
Richard Jackson <[email protected]>
Are you sure that you want to sign this key with your
key "Pacman Keyring Master Key <pacman@localhost>" (645ECB0E)
Really sign? (y/N) y
gpg: signing failed: No pinentry
gpg: signing failed: No pinentry
gpg>
5. To hack this and make pacman work with my local repo signed by the rdjack21 key I had to change the trust to ultimate but I do not like that solution. I would prefer to sign the key and move the trust back down to full which is where it should be.
This is happening on all of my boxes not just one of them. I did find something on the web about "No pinentry" message above and the sugestion was to change the owner of the tty I'm using to be root for the signing to work but that did not work for me (su'ed to root first instead of running everything with sudo).
While changeing the trust works that just feels wrong to me. I really should beable to sign the key.
Last edited by rdjack21 (2014-12-01 01:50:05)

Taking a clue post gnupg 2.1.0-4 upgrade breaks passphrase via STDIN I was able to solve the problem and I can now sign keys.
The solution is add "pinentry-mode loopback" to /etc/pacman.d/gnupg/gpg.conf
And create the file /etc/pacman.d/gnupg/gpg-agent.conf and put "allow-loopback-pinentry" in the file.
Once that is done everythings works as expected!
Marking this as solved.

Pacman-key wiki: Incorrect information

Good Morning all
The new pacman-key wiki has some misleading information within it, that should be corrected/clarified.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pa … e_checking
specifically
Edit /etc/pacman.conf and uncomment the following line under [options]:
SigLevel = Never
try it. The repositories are below this line and therefore the parser takes the last invocation of the SigLevel (global) option at a local level and doesn't honour the setting. You also need to comment any 'SigLevel' lines within the [core], [community] or [extra] repositories.
It should be clarified because it causes confusion.
Thanks
GregW
Last edited by GregW (2012-01-25 10:52:44)

It is a wiki... edit it.
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your e-mail address before editing pages. Please set and validate your e-mail address through your user preferences.
You can view and copy the source of this page:
Oh well, nevermind, i've mentioned it.

Lot size Key without splitting Quota

Hi,
Can any one explain me what is the use of Lot size Key without splitting Quota.
We had created a lot size Key - XY with following seting:-
1) Lotsize Proceed = P
2) Lotsize indicator -K
3) Scheduling =2
4) No of periods = 1
5) Splitting Quota = Not checked(blank)
If we had configured this lot size key, what is the benefits of the above setting, What testing need to be done to know whether this lot size key is working perfectly after configuration?.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
If splitting quota indicator not set, then qouta arrangement is not used during planning wrt to selected lot size.
Lot size procedure you selected, it is a periodic lot sizing procedure. Here the system groups several requirements within a time interval together to form a lot.
Lot size indicator Determines how the lot size is calculated for a certain lot-sizing procedure during material requirements planning. For your selection system creates lot size by refereing to planning calender defined in the system
Scheduling -
This indicator defines the time in the period the system is to create the availability date or the start date for the lot for period
lot-sizing procedures.
The availability date is the date on which the material, including the goods receipt processing time, is available again. In the MRP list, the availability date is equal to the MRP date.
In in-house production, the start date is the order start date, in external procurement the start date is the release date.
according to your selection - Availability date at period end
No of periods - 1
Run a complete MRP cycel to check whether it is working properly or not.
Post the results what you get.
Regards,
Pavan

Replacing a win8.1 key without activating it

Hi,
I'm working a laptop that have a bad key installed. (I'm assuming it was a flagged corporate key.) The owner of the laptop bought a legit key from a local retailer. I did a factory restore to reset everything on the system. Every time I try
to activate windows I get error 0xc004009 (grace time expired). Fine, I try to enter the new key, I get an error that I can't change the key until windows is activated. (the new key is an upgrade key for 8.1 pro). I've tried the activation procedures with
secure boot both on and off. I've called the activation number for offline activation and that didn't work. I've tried the different suggestions on this site and they didn't work. I don't want to go back the owner of the laptop and tell him that he has
to spend another $100 to get a 8.1 premium key just to upgrade to 8.1 pro. Is there anything I can do to force windows to take the new key without activating the OEM key? Any help will be appreciated as I've have already spent several days on this.
Thanks

Hi,
First, I have to say that we can't activate Windows 8.1 with an upgrade key for a OEM Windows 8.1 version. The activation method for retailed and that for OEM version are different. \
Windows Activation in Development and Test Environments
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd981009.aspx
Would you please let me know what the preinstalled Windows version is of this computer, Windows 8 or Windows 8.1?
Do you have any recovery disc or partition with this computer? If so, the factory restore can be helpful without activation issue.
Kate Li
TechNet Community Support

[SOLVED] [pacman] My 'pacman-key --init' issue

pacman-key --init
gpg: Generating pacman keychain master key...
Not enough random bytes available. Please do some other work to give
the OS a chance to collect more entropy! (Need 211 more bytes)
Well, I thought that I could resolve it using random bytes from RANDOM.ORG (http://www.random.org/, in particularly http://www.random.org/bytes/), a really useful website.
Is it a good solution, or is it mandatory to generate random bytes using my PC? And in that case, how can I use random bytes generated from that site?
Last edited by metre (2011-10-14 09:48:31)

teratomata wrote:
hussam wrote:
I installed pacman 4.0 from testing. I did pacman-key --init
but now I can't install anything again
trying to install hplip
Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
(1/1) checking package integrity [####################################] 100%
error: hplip: key "FCF2CB179205AC90" is unknown
:: Import PGP key 9205AC90, "Eric Belanger <[email protected]>", created 2011-04-20? [Y/n] y
(1/1) checking package integrity [####################################] 100%
error: hplip: signature from "Eric Belanger <[email protected]>" is unknown trust
error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature))
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
I found that my pacman.conf didn't get updated, but once I moved /etc/pacman.conf.pacnew to /etc/pacman.conf, everything worked.
I just wanted to say thanks teratomata. I did everything that was mentioned and was continually being asked if I wanted to import keys. Moved pacman.conf.pacnew to pacman.conf and everything works great!

Will zeroizing and regenerating the Default-RSA-Key affect any other general purpose keys on my ASA 5545x?

I have an ASA 5545x that is a production device for receiving all AnyConnect VPN traffic for our organization. We purchased and installed a Comodo certificate to create the trust level necessary for our employees to connect. I'm attempting to enable SSH on the device for management purposes, but the current <Default-RSA-Key> does not allow me to initiate a valid SSH session. I have encountered this issue on other ASAs within our organization, and it hasn't been an issue to simply zeroize the current key and regenerate it to restore the ability to SSH to the devices. Where the snag comes in is that this 5545x is the only ASA that has a key installed that wasn't self signed. With that in mind, I have a few questions about whether 3rd-party signed keys are dependent on the self-signed keys on the device. I intend to zeroize both the <Default-RSA-Key> and the <Default-RSA-Key>.server certificates if they will not affect my VPN-associated Comodo key.
Does the Comodo key depend on other keys existing on the ASA?
Am I free to zeroize only the <Default-RSA-Key> without affecting the VPN associated Comodo key?
Here is the result of the command "show crypto key mypubkey rsa" :
Key pair was generated at: 12:02:29 CDT Aug 19 2014
Key name: <Default-RSA-Key>
Usage: General Purpose Key
Modulus Size (bits): 1024
Key Data:
<Redacted>
Key pair was generated at: 10:16:52 CDT Sep 20 2012
Key name: my.comodo.key
Usage: General Purpose Key
Modulus Size (bits): 2048
Key Data:
<Redacted>
Key pair was generated at: 01:35:42 CDT Jul 30 2014
Key name: <Default-RSA-Key>.server
Usage: Encryption Key
Modulus Size (bits): 768
Key Data:
<Redacted>
Thank you to any and all that assist me in understanding how the ASA handles certificate keys.

As long as the Comodo-signed certificate is bound to the my.comodo.key private key (i.e. you used that key when generating the certificate signing request), you should be fine to zeroize the Default-RSA-Key. The latter should ideally only be used for ssh access.

Usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe

I've got some instances of same error from pacman which I think is abnormal when I tried to upgrade pacman-keyring via "pacman -Syu".
usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe
What action should I take for the errors to maintain my system?
Searching the web and this forum won't answer my question...
The quotation of pacman.log of the upgrade sesson which evoked pacman-keyring upgrading is below:
[2013-04-20 22:04] [PACMAN] Running 'pacman -Syu'
[2013-04-20 22:04] [PACMAN] synchronizing package lists
[2013-04-20 22:04] [PACMAN] starting full system upgrade
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Appending keys from archlinux.gpg...
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] gpg: depth: 0 valid: 1 signed: 5 trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] gpg: depth: 1 valid: 5 signed: 64 trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 5m, 0f, 0u
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] gpg: depth: 2 valid: 64 signed: 1 trust: 64-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 0u
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] gpg: next trustdb check due at 2014-01-22
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Locally signing trusted keys in keyring...
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Locally signing key 0E8B644079F599DFC1DDC3973348882F6AC6A4C2...
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Locally signing key 684148BB25B49E986A4944C55184252D824B18E8...
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Locally signing key 44D4A033AC140143927397D47EFD567D4C7EA887...
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Locally signing key 27FFC4769E19F096D41D9265A04F9397CDFD6BB0...
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Locally signing key AB19265E5D7D20687D303246BA1DFB64FFF979E7...
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Importing owner trust values...
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Updating trust database...
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] gpg: next trustdb check due at 2014-01-22
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded archlinux-keyring (20130224-1 -> 20130406-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded bash-completion (2.0-3 -> 2.1-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] Generating locales...
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] en_US.UTF-8... done
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ja_JP.UTF-8... done
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] Generation complete.
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded glibc (2.17-4 -> 2.17-5)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded binutils (2.23.2-1 -> 2.23.2-2)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded m4 (1.4.16-2 -> 1.4.16-3)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded bison (2.7-1 -> 2.7.1-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded curl (7.29.0-2 -> 7.30.0-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded expat (2.1.0-1 -> 2.1.0-2)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded freeglut (2.8.0-2 -> 2.8.1-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded gcc-libs (4.8.0-1 -> 4.8.0-2)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded gcc (4.8.0-1 -> 4.8.0-2)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded gpm (1.20.7-1 -> 1.20.7-2)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded harfbuzz (0.9.14-1 -> 0.9.16-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded isl (0.11.1-1 -> 0.11.2-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded kmod (12-1 -> 13-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded libldap (2.4.34-1 -> 2.4.35-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded krb5 (1.11.1-1 -> 1.11.2-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded lib32-glibc (2.17-4 -> 2.17-5)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded lib32-gcc-libs (4.8.0-1 -> 4.8.0-2)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded libcap (2.22-3 -> 2.22-4)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded libpng (1.5.14-1 -> 1.5.15-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded libtasn1 (3.2-1 -> 3.3-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] >>> Updating module dependencies. Please wait ...
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] >>> Generating initial ramdisk, using mkinitcpio. Please wait...
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Building image from preset: 'default'
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux.img
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Starting build: 3.8.7-1-ARCH
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [base]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [udev]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [autodetect]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [block]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [filesystems]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [keymap]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [keyboard]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [fsck]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Generating module dependencies
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Creating cat initcpio image: /boot/initramfs-linux.img
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Image generation successful
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Building image from preset: 'fallback'
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-fallback.img -S autodetect
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Starting build: 3.8.7-1-ARCH
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [base]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [udev]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [block]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [filesystems]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [keymap]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [keyboard]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [fsck]
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Generating module dependencies
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Creating cat initcpio image: /boot/initramfs-linux-fallback.img
[2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Image generation successful
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded linux (3.8.5-1 -> 3.8.7-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded orc (0.4.16-1 -> 0.4.17-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded perl (5.16.3-1 -> 5.16.3-2)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded psmisc (22.19-1 -> 22.20-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded sqlite (3.7.16.1-1 -> 3.7.16.2-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded sudo (1.8.6.p7-2 -> 1.8.6.p8-1)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded systemd (198-2 -> 201-2)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded systemd-sysvcompat (198-2 -> 201-2)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded tar (1.26-2 -> 1.26-3)
[2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded wayland (1.0.6-1 -> 1.1.0-1)
Thanks in advance!

I just encountered the same issue with the latest update. I never had something similar to this:
:: Retrieving packages ...
archlinux-keyring-20130525-2-any 367,2 KiB 1023K/s 00:00 [################################################################] 100%
linux-3.9.5-1-x86_64 45,5 MiB 1015K/s 00:46 [################################################################] 100%
linux-headers-3.9.5-1-x86_64 5,6 MiB 1117K/s 00:05 [################################################################] 100%
gnome-bluetooth-3.8.1-2-x86_64 835,0 KiB 955K/s 00:01 [################################################################] 100%
gnome-documents-3.8.3-1-x86_64 305,0 KiB 1034K/s 00:00 [################################################################] 100%
vlc-2.0.7-2-x86_64 7,6 MiB 1162K/s 00:07 [################################################################] 100%
(6/6) checking keys in keyring [################################################################] 100%
(6/6) checking package integrity [################################################################] 100%
(6/6) loading package files [################################################################] 100%
(6/6) checking for file conflicts [################################################################] 100%
(6/6) checking available disk space [################################################################] 100%
(1/6) upgrading archlinux-keyring [################################################################] 100%
==> Appending keys from archlinux.gpg...
==> Locally signing trusted keys in keyring...
-> Locally signing key 0E8B644079F599DFC1DDC3973348882F6AC6A4C2...
usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe
-> Locally signing key 684148BB25B49E986A4944C55184252D824B18E8...
-> Locally signing key 44D4A033AC140143927397D47EFD567D4C7EA887...
-> Locally signing key 27FFC4769E19F096D41D9265A04F9397CDFD6BB0...
-> Locally signing key AB19265E5D7D20687D303246BA1DFB64FFF979E7...
==> Importing owner trust values...

Generating a Primary Key WITHOUT using a Sequence Number

Hi Everyone:
I am trying to generate a primary key without using a sequence number or row count. What the user wants is the maximum value of the highest primary key already in the row set plus 1.
For example, this is a Oracle Table (eg. named BatchSubmit) used to initiate batch job submission, and the primary key is an integer named "Runcard_Number". If there are 4 rows in this table and the Runcard_Numbers are 2, 6, 8 & 12, then the next generated Runcard_Number would be 13.
I have looked throughout this forum and see how to generate numbers using a DBSequence, but the user does not want that. The numbers mean something to them, and they don't want them randomly assigned other than the max in the rowset plus 1. To do it in SQL it would be - select max(Runcard_Number) + 1 from BatchSubmit;
I have been looking at using a hasnext loop and moving the maximum value to the new Runcard_Number, but I am very new to JHeadstart/JDev and I do not know where to put this. I am assuming the BatchSubmitImpl.java, but I'm not sure where to put it or which method to utilize
I would appreciate any assistance.
Mary
U o Windsor

Mary you're in luck, 'cause, I've been playing with the same thing, these days and found that..
You can do that in two ways (that I know):
- by calling a stored function that does max+1 (you can look it up in Dev's guide for Forms&4GLDevs 10g chapter 25.5 Invoking Stored Procedures and Functions)
- by calling hardcoded or dinamicaly written statement, that does the same
public Number callStatement(String stmt)
Number id = new Number(0);
Row idRow = getDBTransaction().createViewObjectFromQueryStmt(stmt).next();
if(idRow != null)
Object o = idRow.getAttribute(0);
if(o != null)
if(o instanceof Number)
id = (Number)o;
else
throw new JboException("Conversion error!");
return id;
You should call it in
protected void doDML(int operation, TransactionEvent transactionEvent)
switch (operation)
case DML_INSERT:
// call here
super.doDML(operation, transactionEvent);
break;
case DML_UPDATE:
super.doDML(operation, transactionEvent);
break;
case DML_DELETE:
super.doDML(operation, transactionEvent);
break;
Enjoy!
S. Julijan

Pacman-key isn't working

pacman-key --init
gpg: Generating pacman keyring master key...
gpg: agent_genkey failed: End of file
gpg: key generation failed: End of file
gpg: Done
==> Updating trust database...
gpg: no need for a trustdb check
Whoa... I was googling around and no one seems to have encountered this problem before. I had JUST chrooted into the environment to install:
I was following this pretty carefully as far as I can tell:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/In … ting_Linux
Any guesses? I tried following the tips on dbus etc. None of these tips seemed helpful cuz none of those files exist. This is just the bootstrap installer.
Thanks, Oh MySQL !!

Did you try generating more entropy?
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pa … he_keyring

Pacman-key

The tone and remarks concerning pacman-key in the wiki indicate PGP signing is upcoming(although not yet default).
Not really needing such a system if I utilize pacman for upgrades regularly, I find it not a welcome change.
I wonder, for example, if a custom raid boot is utilized not utilizing user but only root will not accept the pacman-key system.
This seems to violate the KISS principle as well making the system more complex and subject to interface whammies not yet envisioned.
Attempting to upgrade this date resulted in no package upgrade w/o pacman-key.
If I try to upgrade w/o pacman-key included...... what then?
Can I disregard pacman-key and run ---Syuf....to upgrade? Am I shut off from upgrades w/o pacman-key?

man pacman wrote:
The SigLevel directive is valid in both the [options] and repository sections. If used in [options], it sets a default value for any repository that does not provide the setting.
* If set to Never, no signature checking will take place.

Pacman-key --edit-key without any TTY

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for