Partial PO's not to be invoiced

Hi
There is a requirement that all line items in a PO be received prior to paying any portion of an invoice. This requirement does not apply to all PO's. The buyer should be able to indicate whether this rule will apply to a particular PO. The proposal is to utilize a new payment term as an indicator. This will block the invoice for payment until all line items have been fully received. Once fully received the PO invoice should be automatically released for payment.
Please suggest a method to get this implemented.
Thanks & Regards
Sada

if ur requirement is only pay to total PO itms unless and untill all items received
1) then why r u creating PO of excess items create PO for only recived items
if u still doing it
then create user exit for the same with the help of ABAP person
regards,
snb

Similar Messages

Partial Credit Memo for A/R Invoice with down payment

Dear All,
I am confusing how to perform partial credit memo for A/R invoice that has down payment inside. Is it possible ? would you please share your solution to me ? Thanks so much

Hello,
I am afraid there is no solution yet for this problem. You must create fully quantity credit memo. Maybe, others can have solution yet, so try to do not mark this message answered. The related notes number is 966038. let me know if you need it.
Rgd,
JM

In FB60, duplicate invoice check does not work if invoice date is different

In FB60, duplicate invoice check does not work if invoice date is different
This issue is in FB60 and not MIRO.
Duplicate invoice check is activated in vendor master.
I posted an invoice for a vendor with amount $ 100, Reference 1234 Invoice date Nov 01, 2011
I tried posting for same vendor (and also Co Code) with amount $ 100, Reference 1234 Invoice date Nov 01, 2011. System does not allow. This is fine.
Now I change only date, from Nov 01 to Nov 02, and system allow posting.
Why I don't get the error message when date is different ? It should not be treated as a different invoice since invoice reference, amount, Vendor and Co Codes are same.
SAP documentation says that it checks document date during duplicate invoice check even for FI invoices, then why does it allows in this case.
Is this a bug ?
I already tried changing settings in SPRO under LIV, this does not impact FB60 invoice booking.
Thanks
Sandeep

Hi,
Use BTE - 1110 - (Check on Invoice Duplication) for FB60. Take the help of your ABAPer to make a coding in Function module mentioned in BTE.
Need to make a copy of the FM and then you can do relevant coding.
refer the link.
[http://www.thesapconsultant.com/2006/10/sap-business-transaction-events.html]
Regards,
Shridhar

TDS TAX AMOUNT IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019

Dear All,
I am Facing Following Problem in TDS
While creating an A/P Invoice after putting row level information when user click on u2018ADDu2019 button u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D opens for deduction of TDS amount. When user selects u201CWithholding Tax Codeu201D in u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D to deduct TDS amount for an invoice system shows WTax amount as per rate of deduction. But when user click on u2018OKu2019 to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D window, WTax Amount will comes as zero on A/P Invoice window.
Then when again user will go to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D and manually put the value of WTax Amount system reflects it on A/P Invoice window.
In case when we set approval procedure to A/P Invoice, this invoice goes for an approval. After coming back as approved invoice when originator of invoice going to u2018ADDu2019 the same document system shows an error as u2018TDS TAX AMOUNT IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019
please reply me ASAP
Thanks & Regards,
Swapnil

hi
try this
We need to follow the following steps
u2022     Open the BP master for which TDS needs to be deducted go to the accounting tab followed by tax option and then click on the checkbox subject to withholding tax
u2022     Click on the option WTAX codes Allowed and select the TDS Category
u2022     On the previous window click the check box pertaining the checkbox u201CTDS OVERLOOKu201D
Regards,
Manish

Billing document not relenvent for invoice list

Dear forum members,
For one sales area I can create a invoice list from a billing document, but not for the other.In debug mode first one is relevent for invoice list processing ( VBUK-RELIK), but for another sales area ,thus staus is not relevent.
Partner detemrination was different for both the above sales area.This was the only differnce. Partner determination is correct in both.What can be the other possible reasons for the status NOT RELEVENT for invoice list.
Best Regards,
Kanwal

Dear Goyal,
-->Check the configuration settings if you are using diffirent Invoice documents in two sales areas.
IMG Path is SPRO>Sales and Distribution>Billing>Billing documents>Invoice lists.
-->Check the data in the customer master in the transaction VD02.
Go to Sales area data tab-->Billing document here you check whether you are maintaining the Invoice list dates or not.
-->Check the Partner determination procedure assignment to the Invoice List type at Header level and item level.
Because you are mentioned that partner dtermination wad different.
Header assignment path.
IMG>SPRO>Sales and Distribution->Basic functions>partner determination>set up partner determination.>Set up partner determination for billing header-->Prtner determination procedure assignment.
Item assignment path
IMG>SPRO>Sales and Distribution->Basic functions>partner determination>set up partner determination.>Set up partner determination for billing item -->Prtner determination procedure assignment.
I hope it will help you
Regards,
Murali.

DRQ:Credit Note not based on invoice should transfer reference number to JE

according to SAP business one system behavior, only those credit notes that based on invoices are able to transfer customer/vendor reference no. field value to reference 2 field in journal entry. I would like to propose to enable AP credit note that is not based on invoice to transfer reference number field to JE as well.

Even if it is possible, you would be better split the amount to individual credit note. I have no idea why you need to split line in one credit note.
Thanks,
Gordon

Tcode FV60 with ECC 6.02 does not check duplicate invoices

Hi,
We use FV60 top enter all invoices. We have config (under MM) for duplicate invoice check against company code and "ref field" only. When we enter an invoice with the same ref field value, it gives error message as expected. However, when we change the date, the error message is gone and we are allowed to create the invoice and post the invoice. This is not desireable and behaves very differently than tcode MIRO.
Is there any solution to have tcode FV60 perform the same checks, look to the same config for duplicate invoices in SPRO as MIRO and not allow for invoice creation if the "ref field" is identical?

Hi all,
Any solution on this.. Even we have the same kind of issue in our organization. I am also trying various ways. Plz help me if anyone has found the solution for this. If I get something, i will update.
Regards

Partial Trigger is not working with Panel Group Layout using ADF 11g.

Friends,
I have a requirment , Based on the <af:selectBooleanCheckbox> value I have to render <af:panelGroupLayout> dynamically. If the check box is checked then I have to display panel group layout otherwise not. The problem what I am facing here is Partial Trigger is not working, If I Un check the boolean box and refresh the page then I see it is working. If I don't refresh the page I am not seeing this is working as expected.
Below is the snippet
<af:selectBooleanCheckbox value="#{bindings.ChkBoolean.inputValue}"
shortDesc="#{bindings.OtherOptChk.hints.tooltip}"
id="OtherOpt" immediate="true" autoSubmit="true"
/>
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pgl11" partialTriggers="ChkBoolean"
rendered="#{bindings.ChkBoolean.inputValue}"">
Am I doing anything wrong here
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
I started to document common pitfalls like this. The problem has been reported last month too and is documented in here: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/adf/learnmore/oct2010-otn-harvest-183714.pdf
Frank

Condition records are not showing in Invoice

Hi Experts,
My List price for XXXX material is amount $$$$$. Condition records having required validity.
But the values are not showing in invoice though the pricing analysis shows green for this condition type.
Condition values shown perfectly in preceeding documents.
Analysis message says " Condition record exists but has not been set "
Can you please suggest me, why this condition values are not shown in net value and suggest me the fis.
Thank you in advance.
Edited by: Ganesh B on Feb 4, 2010 4:45 AM

Hi,
Goto the T. Code "VF03".
Enter your billing document number.Enter.Check what is the pricing procedure determined here.Goto the T.Code "V/08".Check whether that condition type present in that procedure.
If so check the validity of the condition records.Ensure it falls under your billing document date.Also ensure that it is not marked for deletion.For this goto the last column in the condition record screen "VK12 T.Code".Ensure that this check box is not ticked.
And you are telling that you are able get this one in previous documents.
Goto the T.Code "VTFA(if your scenario is order related billing)" else goto the T.Code "VTFL(If your scenario is delivery-related billing)".
Select your valid combination.Double click on item.Select your item category.Details.
Make the Pricing type as "D" and pricing source as "blank".
Regards,
Krishna.

Deallocate a credit note from an invoice in 2005

Client needs to be able to deallocate credit notes raised from invoices when posting a payment to help with later reconciliation.
Example: The client has 3 invoices for £100 and a credit raised from the most recent invoice for £50.
The client then pays 2 of the due invoices, less the value of the credit note (£150)
The try to allocate the cash but cannot allocate £150 to the 2 oldest invoices plus the credit note as the credit note is already allocated against the later invoice.
The client has allocated it in such a way in their system, and we should attempt to match it. Therefore, we cannot allocate the payment against one of the 2 earlier invoices and the balance of the last invoice.
Apparently this is very common so adding this as a On Account Payment is messy for lots and lots of accounts.
A much better solution for my client would be to disassociate the invoice and credit upon posting the payment.

Dear Carlos Mario Cuartas
You can think about below procedures for your question.
A. Create Credit Note (by Invoicing procedure)
   1) Selection Type
    When you try to progress rent invoices by using SAP RE Std.Transaction
    (T-Code: RERAIV - Create Invoices ), you can consider about below two selection type :
       a) Selection using FI documents
        --> That is for actual invoice based on the billing(posted) documents.
             & you can define the "Invoice Correspondence" (Include Detail)
       b) Selection using planned items of the cash flow
        --> That is for planned invoice as pro forma invoice (just first time)
             & you can define the another "Correspondence" for this format. (Not Detail)
   2) Summarize Invoices
        a) Per recipient (can involve several contracts)
      --> If the selected business partner has multiple contracts, then the items of all contracts
           are grouped into one invoice.
      b) Per contract
      --> If the selected business partner has multiple contracts, then the items of each contract
           are grouped into separate invoices.
B. Print-Out Format for the Credit Note
    You can define and design the "Correspondence of credit note" as below,
      - Go to RECACUST >> Correspondence > PDF-Based Forms (Mass Print and Single Print) >
                                         Forms > Define Forms
      - Go to RECACUST >> Correspondence > PDF-Based Forms (Mass Print and Single Print) >
                                         Correspondence Activities > Define Correspondence Activities
Regards,
Jeong, Yeong-Chul.

MR 11 not updating the invoicing for services

Hi All,
I have a scenario where the client uses MR11 for clearing the invoices.
He does not use MIRO for invoicing.
During our observation it is found that using MR11 does not update the invoices for services but the invoices for the material received is updated while checking the reports like ME2N.
I have checked the Service based IV and the GR based IV in the invoice tab of PO.
Can you please advice me as to why this is happening only in case of services.
Thanks and Regards
Sridhar.

Hi Charlie,
Thank you very much for the response.
Actually I am looking for the IR reduction and not the GR reduction.
The note you have mentioned applies for GR reduction.
Also we are in the ECC 6 environment.
Please update me with further information.
Regards
Sridhar

Rfebbu00 not clearing the invoice

Hi All,
I am developing a program to clear the invoice specified in lockbox file if check amount matches with the invoice amount. Also if invoice company code is different from lockbox company code, I need to clear that invoice against the invoice company code. I am updating this invoice company code in table AVIP(AVIP-ABWBU). But still program rfebbu00 is not clearing that invoice for this new company code. It is posting the check on customer's account? I debugged rfebbu00, in which it's checking in table FEBCL, whether FEBCL-AGBUK(company code) is not initial. If FEBCL-AGBUK is not initial, it is used for clearing that invoice else FEBKO-BUKRS(lockbox company code) is used for clearing that invoice? So do I need to update table FEBCL also with this new company code to clear that invoice with rfebbu00??
Kindly help me on this.
Regards,
Pranjali

I have the same issue. Can you please describe how you resolved?
Regards,

Issue with VC/2 - not fetching the invoice details

Hi All,
We have an issue with TCode VC/2 in ECC 6. This is not fetching( not showing) the Invoice documents under the header "Last SD Documents".
It is fetching the sales documents like orders, credit memo/debit memo requests but not the invoice documents.
PLease help on this.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Harini Kesani on Jan 12, 2010 8:25 PM

Is it possible that 'last SD document' means 'last sales document', not 'last billing document'? Unfortunately, I'm unable to confirm - we don't use this transaction. You can also check what tables are used in this transaction (get help from an ABAPer or Basis) and then check if there is correct data in those tables. It might be using info structures or index tables, which may need to be populated first.

Good Receipt Note mandatory before Invoicing the POs

Hi,
Trying to make Good Receipt Note mandatory before Invoicing the POs. Created the below SP Transaction Notification (practicing hard!) but getting the error. Just thinking if it is actually possible to make a Good Received Note mandatory!!
CODE:
IF (@object_type = '18' and @transaction_type = 'A')
BEGIN
     If Exists (Select * from OPCH T0 Inner Join PCH1 on T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry Where T0.DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del and T1.[BaseType] != '20')
     BEGIN
          Select @error = -1, @error_message = 'Please Create Good Receipt Note Before Invoicing'
     END
END
ERROR:
Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Procedure SBO_SP_TransactionNotification, Line 36
The multi-part identifier "T1.DocEntry" could not be bound.
Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Procedure SBO_SP_TransactionNotification, Line 36
The multi-part identifier "T1.BaseType" could not be bound.
Thanks in advance.
Kanu

Hi Kanu,
Try:
IF (@object_type = '18' and @transaction_type = 'A')
BEGIN
     If Exists (Select T0.DocEntry from OPCH T0 Inner Join PCH1 T1 on T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry Where T0.DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del and T1.BaseType NOT IN ('20'))
     BEGIN
          Select @error = 18, @error_message = 'Please Create Good Receipt Note Before Invoicing'
     END
END
Thanks,
Gordon

The document is not relevant for invoice lists

Hi SD Experts,
When i am creating invoice list (T.Code:VF21),I got the error that"the document is not relevant for invoice lists". i entered invoice list type per billing document type (transaction OVV7).
I already did those settings in the IMg. But still its not working, i really appericiated that you look into the query.
Please advise.
Thanks
Tulasi

Hi GTNRNR,
-- Check in Customer Master Record (XD01) in billing tab the invoicing list Dates & Invoicing dates fields
--Go to T.Code OVT0 & check these fields are included in your account group
--Maintain the Copy controls for Proforma Invoice (F8) to Invoice list(LR) in VTFF
--in header Copying Req 016
--check mark on copy item numbers
--Pos/neg qty is +
---Go to VF21 and enter the billing document No & Billing Type as LR & Execute
Let me know if your problem is resolved.
Regards
Pradeep

Partial PO's not to be invoiced

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for