Payment Terms conditions differing

Hi,
I am using a Payment term for several vendors which originally has payment due date condition as :"Within 30 days Due net". But when i posted an invoice, the invoice got blocked with Payment block "R".  When i released the Payment block R, the payment due date condition automatically changed from 30 days to 54 days. i could see the same through Document changes via t code fb04.
I then had to manually change it to the correct days/percent. The payment due date got corrected to 30 days after that But my question is why such thing happened? Days/Percent was originally in 30 days when it was header but when WF-Batch post the document is has been changed to 54 days.
Regards,
Priyank

Hi Pryianka and Wojtek,
I too had this issue with the WF-BATCH userID making changes to the Payment due date on release.
It was identified to be an issue with the workflow.
I would recommend that you have a look at the workflow step that releases the invoice.
It will most likely call the following function module:  'BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_RELEASE'
This function module has an input parameter called: "discount_shift", if an 'X' is passed it will introduce offset days based on the baseline due date and the release date.
This calculation is done via function module: MRM_OFFSET_BASELINE_DATE
All I did was just replace the input parameter with a space (' ') instead of an 'X' and this resolved the problem.
Thanks, Bruno

Similar Messages

  • Re-calculate payment term condition

    Hi all,
    We wanted to re-calculate value date according to payment term condition in pricing procedure. We tried formula base (routine) in pricing procedure but in some cases program calculate duplicate values because of finding more than one payment term condition. After that, we tried user exits in sales document(MV45AFZ*) but it could not be solved.
    Do you have an idea how we can solve this problem?
    thanks.

    You can do it . Please follow the steps below:
    1:Create one new condition type and assign the relevnt access sequence.
    2:Add the condition type at the last in your pricing procedure and mark it as statistical.
    3:create a condition record with 0 price, select the relevant paymnet terms, here you can also maintain fixed value date and Additional value dates. check the last 3 columns.
    So if the line item has different payment terms, and the condition record is existing for this paymnet terms, then the fixed value date / additional value days maintained in the record will flow at the line item - billing tab - you can check.
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    Sai

  • Payment terms for different products from a single vendor

    Hi Pundits,
    Our client has a requirement to assign different payment terms for different products. Each product he buys from his vendor has it's own payment terms. He wants us to customize in such a way that when he/user enters the invoice, not only the vendor number is shown along with the product name but also the payment terms for that particular product are calculated.
    I know that only one payment term can be assigned in the vendor master data. Is there anyway to get around this?
    Creating the same vendor multiple times and assign payment terms looks a possible option but that looks quite hectic cause he has close to 1000 payment terms.

    Taurian, thank you for that suggestion!
    I can maintain as many existing payment terms as the client has with his vendors and let him choose the payment terms at the time of invoice entry.
    The only problem is that he might have to change it according to the current market rates for that product. So maintaining any payment term is of little use.
    Edited by: Dummy_Variable on Aug 16, 2011 8:26 AM

  • Payment terms in different languages

    Hi, how can I do to see a payment terms in more than one language? I will created it in spanish, but I need to see it in different languages.
    Thanks,
    Cecilia
    Moderator: Please, search before posting

    Hi,
    The solution referred to above (OBB8, choose languages, translate) updates the 'Own explanation' of the paymen term', in table T052U. And probably that covers your requirement completely.
    However, the 'Sales text' of the payment terms is in table TVZBT, and cannot be translated in the above way.
    I had a requirement to have the 'Sales  text' of the payment term also in different languages.
    Rather than logging on in each separate language and maintain the 'Sales text' in OBB8, we updated table TVZBT directly with SE16N, and transported the entries through the landscape.
    Not quite the standard way, but it works just fine.
    Regards,
    Rob

  • Payment term conditional

    Hello
    One of our customers specified in his contract a conditional payment term. The payment date has to be the latest one between two dates.
    My question is : is there a possibility in SAP to create this kind of "conditional" payment term ?
    Regards
    Stéphane

    If the conditions can be specified ... can it the programmed in a user_exit - try to do it in SD
    I suggest that you adjust the baselinedate and use the standard payment term 0001 as template (Pay immediately w/o deduction)
    If you can't do it in SD ... can you always use a substitution in FI on field ZFBDT. The substitution should call one of your user_exits
    BR
    René V. Nielsen
    Edited by: Rene V. Nielsen on Oct 5, 2011 6:47 PM

  • Payment terms in different langauage

    Dear Gurus
    I  have created a new payment term in English, it needs to be extended in other languages and then transported to other clients.
    I can update the tables entries in transport  request itself, but not sure which table I need to pick.
    Regards,
    Neeraj Srivastava

    HI Neeraj,
    There is a simpler way..
    Just got to transaction OBB8 and there is an aoption for transalation.
    Enter tour description there and the you can transport to other clients in the language you have mentioned in translation.
    Thanks in advance
    Krish

  • Regarding BP tcode and MK03 for updating payment terms for different vendor

    My requirement was to update the payment terms in to MK03.
    Our business useseres will give the payment terms for FI Vendores in BP tcode and save payment terms for FI Vendores in BP TCODE and this payment terms shoule updated ditrectly in to MK03 for every FI Vendor .
    How we will update the payment frome BP to MK03 directly. In BP the technical name for payment terms was LFB1-ZTERM and in MK03 the technical name was LFM1-ZTERM .
    I want to update payment for single company code only. In mk01, we creating vendors for purchase org level how we will update payment to mk01 from BP TCODE pls give how i have to update this payment terms from BP to MK01.

    My requirement  was to update the payment terms in to MK03.
    Our business useseres will give the payment terms for FI Vendores in BP tcode and save payment terms for FI Vendores in BP TCODE  and this payment terms shoule updated ditrectly in to MK03 for every FI Vendor .
    How we will update the payment frome BP to MK03 directly. In BP  the technical name for payment terms was LFB1-ZTERM and in MK03 the technical name was LFM1-ZTERM .
    I want to update payment for single company code only.  In mk01, we  creating vendors for purchase org level how we will update payment to mk01 from BP TCODE pls give how i have to update this payment terms from BP to MK01.

  • Payment Terms at Different Levels

    Hi All,
    To my understanding, at present, the process of populating the payment terms is as follows:
    1. Payment terms are defined at Supplier/Supplier Site level.
    2. Contract PO is created and during the creation, it takes the default payment terms at Supplier / Supplier Site level based on the priority.
    3. Now, all the standard purchase orders that get created take the payment terms defined at Contract PO if we reference this Contract PO.
    Now my question is
    What if the payment terms at Supplier/ Supplier site level gets changed???
    The same will not get applied to Contract PO and the new Standard POs continue to take up the payment terms defined at Contract POs.
    This scenario is creating the confusion to me.
    Can anyone explain the scenario and let me know the way to get Contract PO payment terms get sync with corresponding Supplier/ Supplier site leve payment terms.

    Hi:
    Supplier and supplier site values are used to get defaulted to various document level (PO, Invoices, Payments etc) and changing at document/transactional level does not change the values at Master level. So in your case, you need to change the payment term at contract PO level and supplier/site level separately.

  • Payment terms & condition

    Dear All,
    I want to creat payment term in PO as follows :
    Payment 90% Balance 10% After confirmation
    My client want to lock 10% payment in MIRO for some quality related purpose.
    Will system disallow for 100% payment?
    If yes pl tell me detailed scenario.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    GItesh

    You can use the Terms of payment to acheive this requirement.
    Go to Transaction code OBB8. Create a new terms of payment say Z001, which has the "Installment Payment" ticked.
    Now create two more terms of payment Z002 and Z003. Here mark the "Payment Block" (A or B) for the terms of payment Z003.
    Now go to OBB9, fill as below
    Z001----- 190-----Z002
    Z001--210-----Z003.
    Now at the PO stage, make sure that the terms of payment is Z001.
    At the stage of the invoice verification, the entry would be
    Expense A/c Dr 1000
    To Vendor A/c 900
    To Vendor A/c 100 ( This would be with a payment block)
    At the time of automatic payment, this Rs.100/- will not be selected unless we remove the payment block.
    After confirmation, Go to FB02 trxn and remove the Payment Block..

  • Multiple payment term with different day limit

    We have three payment terms with multiple day limit. for example: ED11 (day limit 10),  ED11 (25 day limit) and ED11 (32 days).
    User enter just ED11 but i dont understand how system understand which out of the three is the require payment term.
    Users feel that due date calculated is wrong. In most case it calculate the due date exactly based on the days mentioned in the payment term. In all cases, days mentioned are 90 days.
    In one case, due date if it is (just 90 days) 30/04 but user feels it should be 10th May in the following (obviously he is reffering to ED11 daylimit 10). In this case, SAP calculate 90 days. Is it because of too many payment terms which same name.
    Best,
    Bala

    Hi,
    Please go and check the following path.If teh user wants no. of days as 10, then it should be maintained as 10 in the no. of days field in Payment terms. I think in your case it may be maintained as 90.
    IMG->Finacial Accounting->General Ledger Accounting->Accounts Receivable and accounts Payable->Business Transactions->Outgoing Invoices/Credit memos->Maintain Terms of Payment->Check No. of days in Payment terms.
    Assign points if u consider this to be useful.
    Thanks,
    Prithwiraj

  • Payment term thread continuation with that

    Thank you all.for your  reply to previous thread of mine.
    So in relation to above my requirement is that Cash discount is based on payment term and differs from material to material.
    Suppose i maintain a cash discount of 1% for material x and the payment term is payment in 7 days then this 1% should be active on the receipt of payment from the customer within 7 days only otherwise the cash discount does not apply.
    Please guide .as no percentage is maintained in payment term because it will be applicable for all the material for that particular customer.

    Suppose you have payment term
    0003 :
    Within 14 days 3 % cash discount
    Within 20 days 2 % cash discount
    Within 30 days Due net
    If you use the condition type SKTO, the payment terms will be activated in the billing document and when the customer makes a payment if the payment date is within 14 days 3% gets activated automatically, within 20 days then 2% and from 20-30 days no cash discount.
    Regards
    AK
    Hope I was able to explain properly

  • Block Payment Term

    In the absence of a Payment Term Condition Record, the PT on the customer master will be applied to the order at the header level. 
    With the same circumstances as, if the Critical Field setting in Define Automatic Credit Control (OVA8) is checked, and the order's PT are changed at invoice entry to a PT different from the Customer Master, will the order block?

    Hello,
    a. Create a new screen variant for the transaction VA01 - using transaction SHD0
    b. In this screen variant, we can make the field terms of payment display instead of ready for input.
    c. Now assign this screen variant to the order type in the configuration where we define sales order types.
    Regards
    Anantha

  • Single invoice for multiple payment terms

    Hi Friends,
    I have given 2 different payment terms for 2 line items in single order and the billing is splitted due to this reason. I want to know where the system is checking this control. Because I want to create single Invoive even the payment terms are different. (The routine 003 under Data VBRK/VBRP in SO to Bill copy controls will be usefull only to create single Invoice for multiple SO's where the payment terms is same). But I need to create single Invoice even for multiple payment terms.
    Can anyone suggest me at the earliest please.
    Kumar

    Hi Kumar,
    The Billing Split is take care at Copy control level.
    For multiple line items in one single SO, with different Payment terms is not acceptable as per the  business logic and its not best practices.
    Please suggest the business to go on Split method only.
    Or
    Try to use Proforma Invoice Concept.
    Regards
    Srini

  • Credit memo payment term

    hi,
    in customer master, what is credit memo payment term?
    what is the difference between credit memo payment term and terms of payment.
    i read from F1 but still can't get it.
    thanks
    rgds

    HI
    In customer master we define a payment terms as well as Credit memo payment terms.
    Like suppose we have for Customer with Payment term = Net 30 days (Z001)
    And for the same customer we have defined Credit memo terms = Pay Immediately (Z005).
    When we post an Invoice for this customer it will have Payment terms as Z001 i.e. net 30.
    Whereas when we post a credit memo for the above invoice it will inherit the new payment terms from Customer master that is, Z005 i.e. due Immediately.
    Credit memo payment terms can be same as payment term or different depending on the business requirement.

  • Issue with Vendor Payment Terms

    Hi Gurus,
    We're facing an issue with the Payment Terms of a Vendor in our SRM system.
    In R/3 the Vendor has Payment Term 'A' but when we create a PO for this vendor it appears with Payment Term 'B' (PT from SRM I think)
    The correct PT is 'A' (the one from R/3).
    Does anyone know if the PT are saved in SRM side also and where to check this information??
    I can check in R/3 with code XK03 but from SRM side -in code BP- I can't find PT data for this vendor.
    Regardss.

    Hi,
    Payment term is different in PO when compared to ECC, the following could be anyone of the reasons :
    01. PLease check the payment term value in CONTRACT; if you assigned contract as SOS in PO for ECS
    02. Please check he tpayment term value in BBPMAININT where you can maintain different payment terms manually.
    I hope the above information is very helpful to you.
    Thanks
    Rajesh K

Maybe you are looking for

  • BIR Form 2307 set up for the Philippines (std formname IDWTCERT_PH_2307)

    Hi Gurus, I would just like to ask help in setting up this standard form in fico. It is a sap standard smartform with the name IDWTCERT_PH_2307. The form can be configured in tcode S_P00_07000134 by supplying the form name to be printed but an error

  • Is it true that a iphone 4s are made with orange unloked

    Is it true that a iphone 4s are made with orange unloked. mundem me ju dergu imei, per mi shiku a eshte unloked

  • JDev10.1.3 EA1 deploy to OC4J 9.0.4.2.0

    It appears that "one-click" deployment to a OC4J 9.0.4.2.0 (standalone) instance isn't supported anymore by JDev10.1.3 EA1, is this correct? Customer I'm currently involved in selected JDeveloper because of "nice" features like one-click deployment,

  • Formula For Calculating An Average

    I have the below formula in a group footer (Group Footer #1) that is suppose to calculate the average between the accumlated number of days (i.e. {@Days Taken}) divided by the number of records (i.e. Count (). The value for the number of days is corr

  • Help needed for assignment????

    Hi there everbody! Well I'm quite new to this, therfore I would greatly appreciated if some1 could help me with my assignment. Assignment:Make a Game applet that makes an object(red oval) move around the applet window by using only four buttons(Up, R