PDS creation: Error: "Several sources of supply that match this name".

Hi ALL ,
i am using BAPI_PDSSRVAPS_SAVEMULTI to create new coponents for PDS .
It thorows an error :
"There are several sources of supply that match this name".
Could you guide on it what could be the possible reason .
Thanks and Regards,
Deepak
Edited by: Deepak Kumar Khandelwal on Mar 26, 2009 11:23 AM

Dear Deepak,
Please check SAP Note 824854 for this issue.
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Similar Messages

Set-PhysicalDisk failing with error: A parameter cannot be found that matches parameter name 'MediaType'.

Hi,
I run the following command:
PS C:\Users\Administrator> Set-PhysicalDisk -FriendlyName PhysicalDisk0 -MediaType SSD
Set-PhysicalDisk : A parameter cannot be found that matches parameter name 'MediaType'.
At line:1 char:46
+ Set-PhysicalDisk -FriendlyName PhysicalDisk0 -MediaType SSD
+ ~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidArgument: (:) [Set-PhysicalDisk], ParameterBindingException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : NamedParameterNotFound,Set-PhysicalDisk
PS C:\Users\Administrator>
As you can see, it errors out, as if MediaType doesn't exist. Has something changed in this command?

Hi,
As you said, it seems like MediaType is not supported as a parameter.
What's the OS version? It should be available in Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows 8.1 or PowerShell 4.0 installed.
In my Windows Server 2012 R2 it is supported.
Please provide the result of $PSVersionTable for comparing. Here is my version:
Name Value
PSVersion 4.0
WSManStackVersion 3.0
SerializationVersion 1.1.0.1
CLRVersion 4.0.30319.34014
BuildVersion 6.3.9600.17400
PSCompatibleVersions {1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0}
PSRemotingProtocolVersion 2.2
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

TF207012:You cannot save this query with this name because another query that uses this name is already open.

Hi,
I am developing a custom control in TFS2012 using c#. The custom control is a button, when I click it in UI, the current work item will be saved in the next state.
But if I new a workitem using the button and save it using "save work item" button after changing something, I always get an error called TF207012. After I close the error message, the workitem has been saved.
How can I removed this error message?
Any help will be apperciated.Thanks.

Hi Aodixius,
For this issue, you might check whether you have defect in your custom control. Generelly, you may also need to custom a web control for team web access after customizing for Visual Studio. About custom control for TFS work item, check the links below for
more information and make sure your custom control works.
https://witcustomcontrols.codeplex.com/
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/greggboer/archive/2010/03/30/work-item-tracking-custom-controls.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/narend/archive/2006/10/02/how-to-use-custom-controls-in-work-item-form.aspx
Best regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Error when creating a source of supply list via me01 and/otr me05

Dear expert,
We use SAP R/3 4.6c release.
I'm trying to create a source of supply that uses a contract.
I get an error message 'Object does not exist'.
When I look at the details of this messsage I see it is
Message OL 826
Diagnosis :
You tried to create an instance of the object type BUS2053 with the key
0000000000001026311990. No instance of this kind exists.
I have checked SW01 and regenerated the object type BUS2053. The generated object looks ok, but when I test it it still comes up with the same error message.
What did I forget?

HI ,
This is a program error .
Implement Note 683767.
According ti this note it will solve the following problem which is similar to your problem
"When you try to maintain a source list using Transaction ME01, the system generates a termination message with number OL826 'You tried to create an instance of the object type BUS2053 with the key. No instance of this kind exists'. "
Hope it helps you .
Regards,
Anupam

GOA not picked up as source of supply in R/3 when converting PR to PO

Hi
We are currently using SRM 5.0 extended classic scenario. Here we are using Global outline agreements which will get replicated to backend R/3 system and can be used as source of supply while converting a Purchase requisition to Purchase order. The aim is to use Global outline agreements instead of Info records which will be more flexible.
Once MRP run is done, based on requirement Purchase requisitions are created. Using ME57 we convert the PRs to Purchase orders by assigning source of supply. At this point I would expect the GOA to be picked up,whcih is created against this product. But this is not happening as of now.
Please let me know if there is configuration or prerequisites that need to be done for this.
Also when I am trying to assign the GOA manually in PR, it is throwing the error as 'Item category of contract does not match with Item category in PR', even though both has Item category as 'Standard'.
<< Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important >>
Regards
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Nov 15, 2010 3:15 PM

Hi
GOA is not source of supply Indeed.
whatever you have distributed the GOA as a Purchasing contract is a real source of supply.
if the contract is available in ECC , then it is a valid source of supply for your purchase request.
Can you use the same contract for any other manual / PM /PS purchase request?
Are you assigning same material contract to your purchase request ?
the problem is for only MRP PRs or all PRs.
Muthu

Source of Supply

Hi everybody,
We are on SRM 5.0 (classic mode). When we create a described requirement the system gets all the sources of supply from the backend system. If there are many sources of supply the system does not assign any one source of supply automatically. However if there is only one source of supply the system automatically assigns the source of supply. Is there a way to not have the system assign the souce of supply to the shopping basket (when there is only one source of supply available)? This should happen only for described requirements shopping basket.
Any ideas or suggestions will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Venkat

Venkat,
<b>Currently we are using punchout. Unless we create a info record it does not create a PO in the backend system. Is there some thing we have to do for punchouts?</b>
You dont need to get PIR and contracts for the creation of PO's from punchout catalogs. The configuration step SPRO>SRM SERVER> MASTER DATA> DEFINE EXTERNAL WEB SERVICES will let you assign the BP number for the catalog. This will be transferred to SRM shopping cart as a partner function 19 from the OCI.
Select a business type product catalog for the new Web Service and confirm your selection with Enter. Once you do that the next page will ask you for additional info liek teh BP number for source of supply. This step will automatically ensure the transfer of the source of supply to SRM as a fixed vendor and enable the PO creation.
If this is satisfied with this step, then you can suppress the source of supply with my workaround solution only for describe requirement. '
Also i have a business question for you. If you want to suppress the source of supply of a product category only in the describe requirement, it really doesnt make sense as in the internal goods you use the source of supply for the same product category.
If your business driver is creation of the follow on document on the basis of the shopping cart (describe requirement or internal goods/services), then i guess for the same product category you need to find a distinguishing criteria between the two and use a BADI to force changing the partner function from 19 to 39 (preferred vendor). This will create a PR for describe requirement.
Hope info helps !!
Please assign points if answer is usefull !!
Sundeep

Automitic source of supply assignment in backend system for SRM

Hello Experts,
I am facing one issue regarding source of supply for SRM purchase Requisitions in backend ECC system.
When we create a shopping cart in SRM 5.0, a purchase requisition is created in backend and has source of supply assigned to it.
I donu2019t want to assign source of supply to purchase requisitions created for SRM.
Can you please suggest how to achieve this?
Also I think, SRM is internally using BAPI u201CBAPI_REQUISITION_CREATEu201D from backend ECC system for creation of requisition. This BAPI has an importing parameter u2018AUTOMATIC_SOURCEu2019, and if we pass space to this parameter, it creates requisition without assigning source of supply.
If this is correct, then can I use any BADI or customization in SRM to set the value of this parameter as space when SRM calls this BAPI?
Thanks in Advance.
Thanks and Regards,
Sanjay

SPRO--> SRM > SRM server> cross application basic settings --> Define objects in backend system (PR,RS,PO)
waht is the settings you maintained for your product category / purchase group - external procurement .
the above setting determines your follow on documents in the backend systems.
as discuused in the thread are you using any BADI ?
Unable to create PO in backend system for a text material in Shopping cart
peter offers how to debug to ..in the above link.
br
muthu

BAPI for assing source of supply for purchase requisitions

Hi,
can any one let me know if there is any bapi or function module to assing source of supply for purchase requisitions.
Points will be given
regards,
siva prasad.

Define fixed indicator in the source of supply , and set the source list usage of MRP to "1 "
Below is help from sap:
==================================================================
Determining the Source of Supply via the Source List
The system first checks whether a quota arrangement has been maintained for the material, which has a validity period that covers the requirements date of the purchase requisition.
It then checks whether only one entry exists in the source list that is relevant to MRP. The indicator for source list usage must therefore be set for a particular vendor so that purchase requisitions and delivery schedules, which are created during the planning run, are automatically assigned to this vendor. In the case of a delivery schedule, you must also have maintained a scheduling agreement for this entry.
If you have maintained all the entries correctly, the system creates a purchase requisition with the source of supply that is recorded in the source list.

Contact Catalog - Source of supply

Hi,
We are with SRM 5.0, Classic scenario with MDM catalogs.
When i create the shopping cart from catalog, source of supply is assigning automatically with the vendor & Contract number.
And because of this, the vendor selected in the shopping cart differs from the vendor that got dispalyed with Purchase Requeistion in ECC.
Is this refers to Contract catalog ? How do i delete this so that it should not ddisplay automatically when ii transfer the items from catalog ?
More inputs on this is really appreciated.
Thanks
Nag

Thanks Muthu.As a work around, it worked
I have one question :
User is trying to get the items from 'X' catalog. This 'X' catalog has 4 suppliers having their different prodct Group.
What i found(analysis) is, for one particualr group 'TLXXXX' whichever material is assinged, when we get back to SRM, they are coming as 'Agreement' in source of supply.
How this is been set up actually ? As per material group ? or ?
If so, how could we delete this contract ?
Please explain.
Many thanks for taking ur time and 4 explanation.
Thanks
Nag

How to attach Source of Supply to Purchase requisition(by MRP)

Hi Friends,
Source list - we are maintaining Source list for source of supply.
Please tell me how to attach Source of supply by means of source determination to the Purchase requisition(generated by MRP) ?. What are the configuration and transaction steps?.
Thanks

Define fixed indicator in the source of supply , and set the source list usage of MRP to "1 "
Below is help from sap:
==================================================================
Determining the Source of Supply via the Source List
The system first checks whether a quota arrangement has been maintained for the material, which has a validity period that covers the requirements date of the purchase requisition.
It then checks whether only one entry exists in the source list that is relevant to MRP. The indicator for source list usage must therefore be set for a particular vendor so that purchase requisitions and delivery schedules, which are created during the planning run, are automatically assigned to this vendor. In the case of a delivery schedule, you must also have maintained a scheduling agreement for this entry.
If you have maintained all the entries correctly, the system creates a purchase requisition with the source of supply that is recorded in the source list.

Source is thought that there is no problem, but NullpointException happens.

private Object createObject(String name)
Object obj = null;
try
Class cls = Class.forName(name);
obj = cls.newInstance();//<=Error point
catch(Throwable e)
System.err.println(e);
return obj;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Above source is method that have class'name and create instance.
I made new class beside existent class.
This method does not create new instance.
Source is thought that there is no problem, but NullpointException happens.
Ask your opinion.

Class.forName( name ) probably can't find the class you are looking for. Do remember that it must be the full path to the class regardless of where the class resides.
For example, if you want a new JFrame you need.
Class cls = Class.forName( "javax.swing.JFrame" ).
See if that helps.
Bryan

Distribution Receipt (Planned) orders w/o source of supply

Hi guys,
How can I get all SNP Distribution Receipt (Planned) orders w/o source of supply in APO?
BR,
Alper

Hi,
You can still create Distribution Receipts (Planned) orders, for this you have to maintain transprotation lane b/w vendor location (soruce) and plant locations (destination). Also you should have maintained the procurement type of the product as 'F' external procurement or 'X' both inhouse/external procurement. To run this create a test scenario by maintaing 2 locations(Vendor and plant location) and a product. Assign the product and locations to active model. Create some forecast using transaction /n/sapapo/rrp3. Enter the product, location(Plant location) and quantity(with negative value). and save. Check the forecast in interactive planning table. Now run the Network heuristics by selecting the vendor, plant location and product. You should be able to see the distribution receipts (PR) created for product.
There is no need for maintain the PDS/PPM as source of supply. Hope this is what you are expecting. If not let me know what actually you are looking for.
Regards
KRN

Could not find application that created this file error in Acrobat

What is going on? I have an InDesign file that I want to convert by opening Acrobat and then converting to PDF. I am getting the error "Could not find application that created this file. [file name] Please select a file created by an application that resides on your computer."
I most often use this functionality when I have multiple files of different origins and need to combine them into one document. Now I'm reading the forums and some are saying this functionality is no longer supported by Acrobat. Pardon my language, but WTF?!?! This is functionality that is commonly used by me and I can only assume other users. Now you have two Adobe products that won't communicate? If so, then all the hoopla stating how great the Adobe suite is should be edited. I have never seen these products take such a step backward!
Sorry for the rant, but I find this to be ridiculous. What is the workaround, besides converting every document to PDF inside its own software and then combing the PDFs?

InDesign uses a different method of making PDF files when you use the File->Export option in InDesign (even with Acrobat installed, it uses an internal copy of the PDF Library engine). As such, the two applications do not communicate directly with each other.
Support for driving the PDF conversion process from within Acrobat has been removed from Acrobat X, beacuse with the new features in InDesign CS4+, Acrobat doesn't have access to the settings it needs to control things such as multimedia, spreads and transitions. ID CS5 divides PDFs into two concepts - "print" and "interactive", neither of which match the presets used by Distiller. Creating PDFs from InDesign files must therefore take place from within InDesign itself.

Trigger Creation Error in Migration

During the migration process from an Access 2000 db to Oracle 8i, a number of triggers are created to replace Validation Rules on fields in the Access Tables (eg >0 And <Now()). However, the trigger at migration time is created with a call to a function CONV_TO_DATE. As you can imagine, this creates an error as there is no function of this name. I get a no variable of this name declared. All I do is delete the "CONV_" and it works a treat. What is going on?
Along the same lines, some other Validation Triggers are created with a duplicate field name in the statement eg "IF NOT (:ois.field1 AS :ois.field1 < 0)". Another, can you help?
Thanks Barb

Make sure that you have the same version of the ADF libraries that you use inside JDeveloper installed on your server. You can use the ADF installer to install them on the server.

Is it true that bundle by name can cause FPGA compiles to fail?

Dear forum,
I have attached a full log of my experience with this apparent bug, but I will summarize it here:
I attempted to compile a labview robotics project for cRIO 9074. The code was all on the FPGA, and I'd tested it all before attempting to compile--much of it was skeleton code proving that the self test system would turn on blinky lights on the front panel. My first attempted compile received a strange failure message in stage 3 of labview's pre-xilinx compilation interface, and the message was strange mostly because it was so intensely vague. It read "An internal software error has occurred. Please contact National Instruments technical support at ni.com/support with the following information: Error 1000 occurred at an unidentified location. Possible reason(s): LabVIEW: The VI is not in a state compatible with this operation."
It being Tuesday the 6th of July 2010, I was unable to reach either the support staff who were on holiday or the web service, which was down for maintenance, so I began disabling pieces of my code using my debugging conditional disable statements. Eventually I found one skeletal code module, one to interface with analog flood sensors, which did not fail to compile. I compared this with another skeletal code module which did fail to compile, and after several tests noticed that adding a bundle by name from a strict type definition (but not an un-bundle by name or a standard anonymous bundle) would cause the vi to fail the compile. With several more tests I confirmed that while the vi would fail to compile with the bbn, with a standard bundle it would compile successfully all the way to the xilinx stage (by which point I didn't care, the bug was definitively pre-xilinx.)
So tonight I will be going into my code and doing a lot of replacing bundle by name blocks with anonymous bundles, but I am still haunted by the extreme vagueness of the error, and by the fact that bundle by name is usually a solid part of the FPGA development platform. It was clearly intended to work. Why didn't it?
Gray Cortright Thomas
Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering
Engineering: Robotics
Class of 2012
Needham, MA
Gray Cortright Thomas
Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering
Engineering: Robotics
Class of 2012
Needham, MA
Attachments:
gtlog2010-07-06-18-24-00.txt ‏7 KB

So I did as Donovan suggested, and this worked for the code example which I posted. But when I started trying to put more of the bundle by names back in this solution stopped working. I then went on to solve a seemingly unrelated problem with the version that had compiled using only anonymous bundle: it had been unable to run some while loops that were in subvis. When I took the code from these subvis and put the loops on the back panel of the main vi, to my utter horror, they began to function again in the compile (running on the hardware). I was afraid that it was subvis themselves that were causing this failure to run, but was relieved when my next test proved this not to be the case: I took that loop on the front panel where it worked and used edit>create subvi to put it in a subvi. It still worked. Thus I was left to search out the difference between the subvi that successfully compiled, and the subvi which compiled but didn't run--and this was that the failed subvi was part of a library. I placed the new, working, subvi in the same library and the code once again displayed the same symptoms as when it had been tested the first time: the loop would not run even once and the flow of control would never finish with the loop--it just delayed forever. This might be a problem with the way I had used the libraries, but I think everything within them was public. My guess now it that the Libraries don't behave the same way they do on the FPGA as they do on the FPGA simulator, and this is why the vis seemed to work when I simulated them. So... I took all the vis, typedefs, and globals out of the libraries and into virtual folders of the same name and... Everything works! Even bundle by name!
The implementation of project libraries in the FPGA compiler may be suboptimal in some respects, but I probed only as deep as necessary to run my code.
And this code is in 7z format because my zip file did not meet the maximum file size requirements of the forum.
It is also very possible that I misunderstood the functioning of the libraries, and the FPGA simulator was blowing sunshine up my nose when it showed them working properly in simulation. Either way, it is probably worth looking into. This weekend I might try to find the simplest project file that shows these symptoms just to prove I'm not crazy.
Gray Cortright Thomas
Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering
Engineering: Robotics
Class of 2012
Needham, MA

PDS creation: Error: "Several sources of supply that match this name".

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for