Performance based Incentives...

Hi All,
How can we calculate Performance based incentives...
e.g.
Sales offices monthly target is 15lakh ...if he sales 12lakh to 15lakh ...he will get 5% of it as performance incentives...and so on...
thanks...
amol

IMG->Time Management -> Incentive Wages
Default Settings
Groups
Time Ticket Types
Premium Formulas
Integration with Logistics
These are the node availbale. Here we have intergration with logistics
For this PDC interface might be required
Best Regards

Similar Messages

Doubt in Scheduling of performance based preventive maintenance

Dear Experts ,
This is with respect to scheduling of performance based preventive maintenance.
I will put my doubt in example so that it will be easy for you to understand.
I want to perform a preventive maintenance for every 100 litres of fuel consumption.
annual estimate is 7200 litres , that means 5 litres a day.
so as per plan , for every day 5 days , maintenance needs to be performed.
same will be appear after scheduling in ip10 also.
While updating in the measuring document , I know that , if 100 litres is updated before due date , then order will be generated in the current date itself.
I just want to know how system responds , if 100 litres consumption takes more than 5 days , will the system generates order as per schedule date or will it wait to complete for 100 litres consumption ??
Regards
Keerthan Kumar

Greetings Keerthan,
That depends on:
1) The frequency that you input Measurement Documents in
2) Your Call Horizon on the Maintenance Plans
3) Your Scheduling Period in your IP30 Deadline Monitoring variant
Generally, SAP will adjust the schedule based on the Measurement Documents entered for the counter (1) to account for readings (usage) which are higher or lower than estimated.However, it will NOT reschedule any Orders already called. So to make sure the dates are usually adjusted to your usage, you want frequently input MDs, a high Call Horizon and a short Scheduling Period.
SAP will determine a scheduled due date for the Order based on the Annual Estimate and the readings. So, if the due date is in 5 days and you are on a call horizon of 100% and a Scheduling period of 3 days, for example:
a) if you do not input Measurement Documents from Day 0 onwards, the Order will be generated due for Day 5 when you run the IP30 on Day 2
b) if you input a Measuring Document on Day 1 indicating that less than estimated or no fuel was used, the due date and call date may be pushed into the future and the Order will be generated after Day 2.
c) if you input the MD after Day 2, this Order will already have been called and will not be rescheduled, but subsequent calls might.

Performance Based Equipment Document for Projects

Dear All,
We are implementing Performance based equipment process in ETM module. We want to create PBE document for projects where we want to enter the WBS against each line item in PBE document.
Currently we are able to create the recipient with reference type WBS where we assign WBS element and the same we are assigning in the PBE document to populate the WBS in PBE document. Here the issue is, we have to create the recipient for each WBS element to create the PBE document as WBS element will get populated for the recipient. We are not able to enter the WBS element directly in the PBE document as it is in non editable mode in the screen.
Could any body suggest how to enter the WBS element directly in the PBE document without the reference of recipient as we have thousands of wbs elements and creating recipient for each wbs element is not feasible.
Thanks and regards,
Basavaraj

Hi,
There are multiple questions in your query.
1. You have to define a counter for finding the performance based maintenance
2. Measurement document needs to be updated regulary by putting the counter reading.
3. Call objects will happen based on Plan and scheduling Or deadline monitoring by considering the updated measurement reading.
4. Running Deadline monitoring is based on frequency of the calls needed. may be daily or weekly or monthly (Example: Every week maintenance (Week time interval calls) for an equipment needs atleast weeky once deadline monitoring)
Thanks
Siva

Performance based maintenance plan

I am trying to schedule my performance based plan under two conditions:-
In the first factor,I have kept my initial counter reading as 0 as on today,my cycle as 2000 hrs,estimated as 2500 hrs.
An my plan date is calculated as 24.10.12.
In the second factor,I have kept my counter reading as 0 as on today,my cycle as 2000 hrs,estimated as 2500 hrs.
An my plan date is calculated as 24.10.12.
Why the planned date is coming as 24.10.12 in both the cases.It should be different.

Hi,
I believe you have created counter today and starting value may be 0 or directly 500KM .. in this case last counter reading for both the values will be same date ..so better post 550KM tommorow and then try this way and check :
First condition :- Start counter reading with 0KM
Secondition :- Start counter reading with 550KM ..
Doing the above should give you different dates ..
In your case you have posted both OKM & 500KM on same day you will not find any difference in calculation of dates ..
Note :- System takes the last counter reading date as the start date for calculation ..in case of Counter based plans ..
regards
giri

Performance based maintenance Plan and regular reading

SAP says that for performance based plan it is imporatnt to enter the current reading REGULARY, even if it has not changed. otherwise, the system genrates call objects based on estimated annual performance entered for the counter, even though the counter reading has not in reality been reached.
My question is what does REGULAR means? does it means weekly reading? or daily as suggested in post http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2016488&tstart=0
My concern is daily zero value reading, isn't this an over kill and too much unneccessary data.
I will appreciate your views.
Regards

Thanks fopr your reply.
I didnt quite get that though.
are you saying I dont need to load regular zero values if vehicle is not doing any KM, as long as annual estimated value is realistic?
What should be the annual estimated value of the counter for the following plan?
1- 3MON OR 10,000 KM
2- 6MON OR 20,000 KM
3- 30MON OR 60,000 KM
I would think its 40,000 Km per year. But if i do that and if my vehicle doesn't do any KM and stay parked for longer period then maintennace plan calls the the KM based package instead of Mon based. hence bringing the call object sooner then it was suppose to.
My original question was how REGULAR reading is acceptable for performance based plans e.g. weekly, monthly etc?
Regards
Edited by: aqvarious on Feb 16, 2012 7:14 AM
Edited by: aqvarious on Feb 16, 2012 7:22 AM

Performance based maintenance

I have made performance based maintenance plan , in this plan i have assin counter with annual estimate 100 nos and my Maintenance plan cycle lenth 10000 nos . ( annual estimate i kept 100 nos because i need maintenance order counter baase only ) so system schedule the plan ,with call plan date 4 jan 2110 .now when i update the maintenance document ,counter reach 100001 system generate the maintenance call with plan date 4 jan 2110 not on order generate date.
but we required the plan date on which maintenance order generate so what can i do in the master data so i can get same date on which maintenance order generate.
Pl help
Raghav

There are 3 things in Maintenance Plan.
Maintenance Plan - Call Date
Maintenance Plan - Plan Date
Maintenance Plan - Call Horizon
Call Date is date on which Maintenance Order gets created.
Plan Date is basic start date of Maintenance Order (when maintenance should start)
Call horizon specifies as a percentage when a maintenance order should be created
In your case i would suggest you to maintain call horizon as 100% that means your order created date and maintenance date (basic start date of maintenance order) are same.
Also plz refer the below link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm60/helpdata/en/3c/abb377413911d1893d0000e8323c4f/content.htm

Cycle sets in Performance Based Preventive Maintenance

Hi,
Can any one explain what is cycle sets in Performance Based Preventive Maintenance means?
Thanks in advance.

hi
Cycle sets are used for multiple counter plan where the unit of measurement is different .For example you have to plan your equipment based on KM it had serviced and also based on Months ,then you have to create cycle set for these 2 measurement like KM and Mon ,then while creating the multiple counter plan you can specify the cycle set and make the scheduling
Also refer help.sap.com
regards
thyagarajan

Performance based/Intelligent Routing

Hi all,
I've built a great many large scale ISP and Data Center networks in the past.
As you know many many years ago BGP metrics became inefficient in making good routing decisions. So in the early 2000's companies began to come out with Intelligent Routing appliances that would "learn" traffic destinations and calculate latency/loss/jitter to and from destinations, then use that calculation to determine best path. Then best path would be injected into route table. I have been out of touch for the last few years. I assume that calculating traffic decisions has become even more complex, even down to the application layer. That is how I learned about Cisco NBAR2 and Cisco Adaptive Intelligent Routing AIR. Anyway, what does Cisco provide today to help ISP and Data Center routers do performance based routing/intelligent routing?
Thanks
Justin Franks

I found it.
Cisco came out with OER which I didn't use much but should have.
Then in 2008 Cisco came out with PfR.
PfR replaces OER.
More info here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps8787/products_ios_protocol_option_home.html
Guess I have some catchup to do.... I'm a LITTLE out of touch, lol.

WHERE Clause performance based on order - ? Maybe?

Hello everyone - thanks in advance for the always helpful help. :-)
I have a query...
SELECT
WOH.COMPANY_NUMBER,
WOH.ACCOUNT_NUMBER,
COUNT(WOH.WORK_ORDER_NUMBER) AS TROLLS
FROM
PENDING_WORK_ORDERS PWO
INNER JOIN KAN_WORK_ORDER_MASTER_HISTORY WOH
    ON PWO.ACCOUNT_NUMBER = WOH.ACCOUNT_NUMBER
WHERE
WOH.OFFICE_ONLY_FLAG <> 'Y'
AND WOH.WO_STATUS = 'CP'
AND WOH.SCHEDULE_DATE BETWEEN ('1' || O_CHAR(TO_DATE(SUBSTR(PWO.DATE_ENTERED, 2, 6), 'YYMMDD') - 30 , YYMMDD'))
AND PWO.DATE_ENTERED
GROUP BY WOH.COMPANY_NUMBER, WOH.ACCOUNT_NUMBERThe KAN_WORK_ORDER_MASTER_HISTORY file has approx. 10,000,000 records in it. Does the order of the WHERE statement effect performance? This query now takes approx 40 minutes to run - but I was wondering if I reordered the WHERE statement (ie - Bring statements to the top that would cut the results more) - would this work?
If not - any suggestions to speed this up? There are only a small set of these records that we really need - probably about 1% will actually match - is there any way to narrow down this set before there WHERE search is done? The SCHEDULE_DATE field is stored as a number in the format 1YYMMDD - the dates go all the way back to 2003 but we are only needing the last two months work (1071101 - 1071217).
Am I making any sense? Sometimes these issues are very hard to explain...
Thanks again.
Brett

so I have to use the TO_DATE and TO_CHAR functions quite a bit - which always seem to slow the query down considerably. There is that to consider that indexes will not get used, unless you try a function based index as also suggested.
The real problem may be the cardinality is impossible to estimate the number of rows each operation may return, and as the volumes are large the impact will be worse.
we are only needing the last two months work (1071101 - 1071217).There are three times more possible values between the numbers as there are days between the two dates, and the optimizer bases the most efficient plan using this information.
SQL> select 1071101 - 1071217 from dual;
1071101-1071217
           -116
SQL> select to_date('071101','yymmdd') - to_date('071217','yymmdd') from dual;
TO_DATE('071101','YYMMDD')-TO_DATE('071217','YYMMDD')
                                                  -46
this is for a national corporation that i have absolutely no say in how it is formatted or administered....And right now it is going as fast as it has been designed to go. When someone has built and provided you with a farm tractor, you aren't going to be winning any formula 1 or nascar races.

Settings for performance based maintenance plan

Hi experts,
Incase of hour or Km dependent performance base plan, how we can fix the reading (In hours or Km) limit or period of order generation? what is the impact of annual estimate? Please give me an example with all readings.
Regards,

When you create a plan with a counter (Associate a measurement point of counter type to the same), then you would be able to specify at what intervals (Counter readings for this measurement point), the call object associated to the Maintenance plan should be generated.
The actual call date for this maintenance plan however depends on the "Annual estimate " for the measurement point counter and also the actual counter readings captured for the measurement point
For ex: Annual estimate maintained for the Point : 12,000 Miles .Maintenance for this equipment should be triggered for every 1000 Miles (This should be the counter interval maintained for the Maintenance plan). Based on the above the maintenance plan would generated a call every one month (Annual estimate / period).As an example, when this Maintenance plan is scheduled for 1 yr, then 12 maintenance calls will be generated one each for every month. The actual and scheduled dates for the call depends on the various other scheduling parameters maintained for the Plan.
Its critical for any counter based maintenance plan that the counter reading is Captured , Through measurement documents regularly, EVEN IF THERE IS NO CHANGE TO THE COUNTER READING, Otherwise, the system generates call objects (for example, maintenance orders) based on the estimated annual performance entered for the counter, even though the counter reading has not in reality been reached.
for ex: owing to a vehicle breakdown/ repair if the vehicle has been in repair shop for a month,To avoid a maintenance order being created before it is needed, you maintain the new total counter reading in the system regularly over the period of the month. You then reschedule the maintenance plan using IP30, and the call date is recalculated based on the updated counter reading. In this case, the call date would be later.
[Detailed SAP Help|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/3c/abbcf6413911d1893d0000e8323c4f/frameset.htm].
Regards
Narasimhan

How to evaluate material delivery performance based on standard reports?

Hi
In my organisation we have discussions that material is not deliverd on time ordered through a PM Work Order. I would like to evaluate the performance to get a objective analysis. My first thoughts are:
- Take a list of released work orders in a certain period (e.g. last month)
- LIst the materials used on those work orders
- Compare the requested delivery date for the material (on PR) with the PO creation Date and Goods Receipt Posting Date.
Since there is no standard report for it, what reports could i use to combine for this analysis?
Many thanks
Felix

You can use RESB, EBKN, EKPO, EKKO, EKBE tables to link all the details to get the desired report.

Performance based plan with reset

Hi Experts,
One of my client is maintaining Fleet and have planned maintenance packages for the vehicles.
For every 10000 KM they do Regular service, every 30000 KM they do Minor service, for every 100000 KM Major service.
Minor service includes Regular and Major includes both Minor and Regular.
There should be 100% shift in all the packages but shift in Regular package should not shift the dates of Minor and Major, shift in Minor should shift Regular but not Major.
And once the plan reaches 100000 KM and Major service is completed, the maintenance plan should be reset and again start with the cycle (Re,Re,Mi,Re,Re,Mi,Re,Re,Mi,Ma).
Any way this is possible with standard or through development.
Thanks & Regards,
Feroz

PeteA,
Based on the requirement given by Feroz, it seems that final reading on the vehicle is 100000.
Feroz,
Please confirm what is maximum reading on your vehicle meter which makes it 0.
If it is 99999 (i.e., 100000). The solution given by me would work.
If it is not the maximum reading, you might be able to play with Annual Estimate in Measuring point and Scheduling Period in Maintenance plan to achieve your requirement.
Please do reply.
Chin2.

Performance Based Preventive maintenance

Hi Guru,
I have equipment motor. But I need to do the preventive maintenance based on motor running hour (ie: every 1000hr).
How to map the scenario in SAP
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
S.Babusingh

Hi
You need to create the measuring point for the equiment motor.(IK01)
and in the maintenance plan (IP01)you chose counter based mainteannce plan and set the couter reading 1000 hrs.
also you can define the other paramenters in the plan.,
once the measuring documents reading(IK11) updated by you is reached equal to or greter than the set value orders gets triggerd.
this is standard SAP process
regards
Krishna

Query performance based on condition value

Hi,
I have a simple query which is actually on a view dwdb_dba.actl_partinfo_cust. Please see query bellow
select * from dwdb_dba.actl_partinfo_cust WHERE insertdatetime=(select max(insertdatetime)
from dwdb_dba.actl_partinfo_cust Where system_source='UTS') AND SUPPLIERID='CG1' and Custdevice in ('BT-M2789-C')This query is taking very very long time to return (around 30 records) but if i u
Here if i change the condition "AND SUPPLIERID='CG1'" to "AND SUPPLIERID='DUMMY'", it returns within 3 seconds. Execution plan is same for both then why one query taking too much time and other returning so fast and how can i tune the query against the condition AND SUPPLIERID='CG1' so that it can also return within 3 seconds.
I actualy dont understand the behaviour
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3622663398
| Id | Operation                       | Name                        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                             |    10 | 42790 |   152K (6)| 00:00:59 |
|* 1 | VIEW                           | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST          |    10 | 42790 | 59972   (4)| 00:00:23 |
|   2 |   UNION-ALL                     |                             |       |       |            |       |
|* 3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_UTS      |     9 | 3429 | 59968   (4)| 00:00:23 |
|* 4 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN            | ACTL_PART_CUST_UTS_IDX3     |   420K|       | 1462 (11)| 00:00:01 |
|* 5 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_PROMIS_4 |     1 |   311 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN            | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_4_IDX1   |     1 |       |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |   SORT AGGREGATE                |                             |     1 |    14 |            |       |
|   8 |    VIEW                         | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST          | 1363K|    18M| 92040   (8)| 00:00:36 |
|   9 |     UNION-ALL                   |                             |       |       |            |       |
|* 10 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_UTS      | 1363K|    33M| 92036   (8)| 00:00:36 |
|* 11 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN          | ACTL_PART_CUST_UTS_IDX1     | 1481K|       | 5528 (10)| 00:00:03 |
|* 12 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_PROMIS_4 |     1 |    15 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN          | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_4_IDX1   |     1 |       |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Thanks

Salman Qureshi wrote:
This query is taking very very long time to return (around 30 records) but if i u
Here if i change the condition "AND SUPPLIERID='CG1'" to "AND SUPPLIERID='DUMMY'", it returns within 3 seconds.
My developer has changed the code of the view which was involved and not it is working fine but still i m curious to know that what could be the reason of this. Same execution plan but only condition value is different. One value returns some rows but returns within few seconds and other condition also returns a few rows but may hours.Salman,
A bit more details would help diagnose the root cause.
If you are still interested in diagnosing the root cause, you may want to provide complete EXPLAIN PLAN output, along with predicate section. If you are on 10g, you may want to provide the output of DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR which will show the actual plan used along with actual number of records generated by each step in the execution plan.
It is possible that SUPPLIERID column data is skewed so that there are less records in table for the value 'DUMMY' but much more number of records for the value 'CG1'. This predicate combined with the other predicate on CUSTDEVICE column may have been resulting in similar number of rows the final query returns.
It is possible that the predicate on CUSTDEVICE is being applied at different stage in the plan than the predicate on SUPPLIERID column.
Edited by: user503699 on Aug 3, 2010 3:11 PM

Automation of scheduling for performance-based planning

Colleagues,
I've got a question regarding automation option for skipping calls upon measurement document reading update.
So, scenario as follows
MP with strategy (activity) is scheduled with 1K, 5K, 10K hours with surpressing hierarchies 1,2,3 accordingly. Initial counter reading is 0, estimated ann perf- 20K. So, we schedule IP10 which gives us all scheduled-on-hold's for 365 days of scheduling period.
Once I enter 5600 reading measurement doc, the batch would generate four 1K calls and one 5K one..They want the system automatically skip those calls in background and get only one 5K order, avoiding redundant four 1K' ones..
I don't see much of room for maneuver for automatic scheduling in PM..
Any suggestions??
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
(that's me who initiated the thread-service marketplace was messing with my last name)
They've got elaborated on the scenario and aforementioned user exit perfectly serves the purpose of restarting cyclees with offset when late reading is entered, skipping the redundant calls.. However, in that particular scenario described below that wouldn't help..
so, the requirement is as follows:
1.minor/mayor PM every 750h and 1500h accordingly
2. three different overhauls (at 15000, 30000, 60000H accordingly)
3. 500h inspection after each overhaul
After 60500H the cycle should start all over
the sutuation is worsen by the fact that I should create 5 different plans, since every maintenance pack has different call horizons..
So, we have
1. plan #1 for 500H inspections with call horizon 100%, strategy offset '500'
2. single plan#2 for minor/mayor PM with call horizon 67%, strategy offset '1250' for minor PM and '2000' for major PM
3. plan#315K overhaul1 with call horizon 93%,
4. plan#4 30K overhaul1 with call horizon 90%
5. plan#5 60K overhaul1 with call horizon 95%
I have two strategies: one for inspections and minor/mayor PM, another-for overhauls, both strategies using supressing hierarchies..
I was using offset and 'restart' and 'start-in-cycle' those plans..
after first 15K overhaul package completed:
plans #1 and 2 are restarted with latest counter reading using function u2018Restartu2019;
Plans #3,4,5, are restarted with latest counter reading using function u2018Start in cycleu2019, selecting the relevant timeframe (i.e. offset shall be set before next due call on relevant cell in package sequence ruler)
Just wanted to double check with you whether you guys got any suggestions or recommendations..
Appreciate it!!

Performance based Incentives...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for