Permission Details of Permission Level

I would need to retrieve permission details of permission level programmatically. For example: We have full control , i would like to get what all are the permissions included in the permission level. I was exploring SProle, SPbasepermission.
The class “SPBasePermissions” has enumeration using which I am able to get the permission type but not the permission description to show as below. I am able to get using ‘manage lists’, add items, edit items’ etc enumeration value but not the
corresponding description. So would like to check whether anyone has done anything related to this before. pls let me know.

from the UI, go to the site collection's root web, permissions, and click the 'Permission Levels' in the ribbon.
programmatically, you need to get the SPRoleAssignment.RoleDefinitionBindings
Scott Brickey
MCTS, MCPD, MCITP
www.sbrickey.com
Strategic Data Systems - for all your SharePoint needs

Similar Messages

Does SAP have any WBS report able to drill downdown detail to PO level

Hi Expert,
Would like to seek for your advise as below:
a) Does SAP have any WBS report able to drill downdown detail to PO level for the assign cost?
What is the T-code?
b) What is the table contain WBS information with related PO level for the assign cost?
Please help.
Regards,
KH

Hi,
a) Try CJI5 as menioned by Gokul.
b) Try a query combining EKKN, EKPO and PRPS (if you need any other WBS detail).
regards
Sreekanth

How to get Sales Order Partner Details at Item Level

Hi,
Is there any FM/BAPI to get the Order Partner Details at Item Level, using the Sales Order Number ?
Thanks

VBPA is the best table.
You can query that table
But you should be carefull about item number:
in POSNR, if you observe the entries, you will find one entry with '000000': This corresponds to header record and the rest is at item level.
Thanks
Kiran

Operating OS X on MacBook use a wired 4G hotspot and both Chrome and Safari are running sluggish, freezing machine, and even pop-ups ask to Kill or Wait. i wait. Have tried the Utility Permission Verified and Permission Repair and actually got worse. ??

operating OS X on MacBook use a wired 4G hotspot and both Chrome and Safari are running sluggish, freezing machine, and even pop-ups ask to Kill or Wait. i wait. Have tried the Utility Permission Verified and Permission Repair and actually got worse. ??
If I install OS X Maverick with its fixes will this fix the problem??
HELP

Mac OS X ver 10.6.8 Processor 2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo , Memory 2 FB 1067 MHz DDR3, Startup Disc OS X HDD , No DVD available, Not removing Chrome - run entire business on 5 gmail accounts and operations.
L2 Cache:          3 MB
Memory:          2 GB
Bus Speed:          1.07 GHz
Boot ROM Version:          MB51.007D.B03
FUJITSU MHZ2160BH FFS G1:
Capacity:          160.04 GB (160,041,885,696 bytes)
Model:          FUJITSU MHZ2160BH FFS G1
Revision:          0081008C
Serial Number:                  K64JT8928554
Native Command Queuing:          Yes
Queue Depth:          32
Removable Media:          No
Detachable Drive:          No
BSD Name:          disk0
Medium Type:          Rotational
Partition Map Type:          GPT (GUID Partition Table)
S.M.A.R.T. status:          Verified
Volumes:
Capacity:          209.7 MB (209,715,200 bytes)
Writable:          Yes
BSD Name:          disk0s1
OS X HDD:
Capacity:          125.63 GB (125,627,793,408 bytes)
Available:          55.99 GB (55,987,331,072 bytes)
Writable:          Yes
File System:          Journaled HFS+
BSD Name:          disk0s2
Mount Point:          /
BOOTCAMP:
Capacity:          34.07 GB (34,068,234,240 bytes)
Available:          6.58 GB (6,580,842,496 bytes)
Writable:          No
File System:          NTFS
BSD Name:          disk0s3
Mount Point:          /Volumes/BOOTCAMP
This is a friends computer and I do not have access to apple codes, or how this system works.

Blog Permission requires 'Manage List' level just to edit a post

SharePoint 2013
I'm posting this is a few flavors all over the internet because I'm not getting any responses. Basically I feel their is a bug in that a user that has contribute permissions can not edit a blog post because the "edit" menu option does not show.
To reproduce, you just need to log into a blog with Contribute rights only which gives you the ability to edit a item, but DOES not give you the ability to manage the actual list. You will see that the Edit menu does not show in neither the summary page
or the Post page when looking at a specific post.
You can however manually change the URL to the EditPost.aspx page and it will let you edit. It is as if the "Edit Menu" is linked to the "Manage List" permission instead of the "Edit Items" permission.
Standard users should be able to create post, edit post, but not change the settings of the entire Blog Post library!

Danny.. sincerely thank you for trying to help. This is very frustrating.
So to make sure the problem is not something I caused, I've been doing all this on a clean Win 2008 R2 Virtual Machine. I then perform nothing special and simply do the following:
1) Install SharePoint Foundation 2013 - Stand Alone (although this problem also exists in my Domain Farm as well as my trial version of Office 2013). As part of the install, I do install the required March CU (KB2768000) but no other SharePoint\Office
patches.
2) With no other changes but the fresh install, I open Central Admin --> Create Site Collections --> myBlog (via the Blog Template)
3) I then go to {/sites/myBlog} --> Site Settings --> Site Permissions. I then add the following test accounts as such....
   myBlog Owners (Full Control) <-- SPOwner
   myBlog Members (Contribute) <-- SPMember
   myBlog Visitors (Read) <-- SPVisitor
4) Verify (which is the default) that Site Settings --> Site Libraries and List --> Customize Posts --> Advanced Settings --> Create and Edit Access = "Create and edit all items"
... Now I sign in as each of the 'test accounts' and the results are as follows.
spOwner = Home page DOES show the Edit link next to the "email a link" option for the "Welcome" Blog Post.
spMember = Home page does NOT show the Edit link next to the "email a link" option for the "Welcome" Blog Post.
spVisitor = Home page does NOT show the Edit link next to the "email a link" option for the "Welcome" Blog Post.
... Now if I add the "Edit Permission" to the Members and Visitors group the Edit link DOES show. However, for both accounts (SPMember & SPVisitor), I can now do the following...
COG --> Site Settings --> Site Libraries and Lists --> Customize Post --> Versioning Settings --> Require content Approval = Yes.
As a Visitor (now with Edit Rights) I was even able to COG --> Add an App --> {take your pick}
How scary is that ?!?!?!

Managing ldap user querying permission at BI server level

Hello Guys
I am trying to manage the corporate resource by limiting certain users to run query at certain time or certain size. I know it can be done using 'manage--security' to set the querying limit for each users that are defined in the Admin tool..
However, since we are using Ldap authentications, none of the users that are using OBIEE are created in admin tool, they are all set up using Ldap server which is configured in the Admin tool..
So in this case, how would i be able to set up query limit for these users throu Ldap?
Thanks in advance

You should still create a group in your RPD and set the query limits. Then in your GROUP init block you could add something like this to make sure all users will get this group:
UNION ALL
SELECT 'GROUP', 'General Query Limits' FROM DUAL

Unexpected error while granting permission in site permission !

Hello,
While granting permission to user in site permission it throws unexpected error in IE while in chrome it works perfect !
Any idea ?
Thank you in advance !
Dipti Chhatrapati

Hi Dipti,
I agreed with Scott, please check the log file to find more information based on the correlation ID.
More information about checking log based on correlation ID, please refer to the link:
http://mroffice365.com/2011/09/using-correlation-id-to-find-out-sharepoint-problem/
In addition, whether you used the same account when using the IE and Chrome.
Which version did you use for IE? Please try to use IE 10 32-bit, compare the result.
Make sure that account you used in IE have manage permission on the site.
Please add the site into IE Trusted Site, compare the result.
Best Regards,
Wendy
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

Help needed in Master Detail Form - 2 level of details

Hi,
I have a form with 2 levels of Master Detail and a Find window
The Datablocks are
- Batch
- Headers
- Lines
- Manual datablock for Find Wndow
I have created relation between Bacthes and Headers with Batch Id
I have created relation between Headers and Lines using HeaderId.
The issue is that,
If I search with '%' in Batch block, by default it will show results in 'Headers' and 'Lines' block.but if i navigate to the next record in batch block , only Headers block shows results but Lines block does not show result.
If I search from Find window also, only Batch and Headers block shows results but Lines block will be empty.
In the 'Batch' block if I search with specific data , the screen shows results in 'Headers' and 'Lines' block.
Can you please help me solve it.
I have written a PRE-QUERY on Batches block to set where clause from Find window.
I have written a PRE-QUERY in Headers block to set where clause from Find window
Thanks,
Kamath.
Thanks,
Gowtam

Hi,
When you execute normal not by searching through ENTER_QUERY mode. Then data is coming in all blocks
- Yes. Once I go to the Form if I search using '%' in batch block or search for a particlaur record i Batch block, the results shows up in Headers and Lines block.
Ex: say there are 2 records in Batch block(A and B) and I search by %, by default i get 1 batth record (A) and corresponsding headers and lines
now when i use down arrow key in the batch block, second record(B) will be showed in batch block. relevant Headers block records will be shown but Lines block does not get queried.
Similarly if coem to the Form from search window then also, Batch and Header blcoks wil be shown but not Lines block
PREQUERY at Batch Level_*
V_WHERE := 'WHERE 1 = 1';
IF :XXYH_ICAN_CALC_WB_FIND.PERIOD IS NOT NULL THEN
     V_WHERE :=      V_WHERE || ' AND PERIOD = '''||:XXYH_ICAN_CALC_WB_FIND.PERIOD||'''';
END IF;
IF :XXYH_ICAN_CALC_WB_FIND.BATCH_ID IS NOT NULL THEN
     V_WHERE :=      V_WHERE || ' AND BATCH_ID = '''||:XXYH_ICAN_CALC_WB_FIND.BATCH_ID||'''';
END IF;
IF      V_WHERE IS NOT NULL THEN
     set_block_property('XXYH_ICAN_WB_BATCHES',DEFAULT_WHERE,V_WHERE );
END IF;
PRE-QUERY at Header Level_
IF :XXYH_ICAN_CALC_WB_FIND.BATCH_ID IS NOT NULL THEN
     V_WHERE :=      V_WHERE || ' AND BATCH_ID = '''||:XXYH_ICAN_CALC_WB_FIND.BATCH_ID||'''';
END IF;
IF      V_WHERE IS NOT NULL THEN
set_block_property('XXYH_ICAN_WB_TRX_HEADERS',DEFAULT_WHERE,V_WHERE );
END IF;
Thanks,
kamath.

FILE.IO.PERMISSION and SOCKET.PERMISSION when calling jdev proxy from DB

Hello everybody,
i deployed a webservide proxy (made in jdev 10.1.3.2) to an oracle 10gR2 database. Invoking this proxy works very well when calling it (as a procedure in the database) on the same machine as the DB is running.
But when trying to invoke the procedure remote on the DB-server from another pc i get 2 error messages (randomly):
java.security.AccessControlException: the Permission (java.net.SocketPermission 192.168.20.1:1521 connect,resolve) has not been granted to VECOZO. The PL/SQL to grant this is dbms_java.grant_permission( 'VECOZO', 'SYS:java.net.SocketPermission', '192.168.20.1:1521', 'connect,resolve' )
java.security.AccessControlException: the Permission (java.io.FilePermission \\WEBFS01\WEBFS01_Vecozo\Temp\Acc\MAY07 read) has not been granted to VECOZO. The PL/SQL to grant this is dbms_java.grant_permission( 'VECOZO', 'SYS:java.io.FilePermission', '\\WEBFS01\WEBFS01_Vecozo\Temp\Acc\MAY07', 'read' )
I gave this permissions in the sys schema to the vecozo schema following the example the error produces for me, but it doesnt work! When i grant socketpermissions on the port secified by the error and i run the proxy again the db comes up with the same error, only with a different port number. I'm getting crazy here. Also the granting of the file.io permission seems to have no result.
What is strange is that it all works when invoking the proxy locally (from the pc as where the db is running). I think this is because locally you dont need socketpermissions (as sockets are primarily for communication with other pc's). Furthermore i did not even grant the file permission when working locally in my testenvironmentand it all worked just fine. so i dont know why i suddenly need this permission when invoking the procedure on the productionserver from an external pc.
Can somebody plz help me with this????
greetz,
Kim

Anybody :)

Transferring order header level details to line level details

I know, that by creating an order, the order header information is the 'default' information for the lines. What that means is that all the information at the header level, i.e. Freight terms, etc...will default to the lines.
But when an order already exists and I change some field in Order Header level, changes are not automatically transferred to Order Lines.
For example, customer requirement is to change ship method for existing order. I change Ship Method on Order Header, but then I must go to Line details and change Ship method on every line. Is there any way, how to change order lines details automatically after Order header update?
Thank you
Zdenek Moravec
Information Systems Department
Matsushita Television Central Europe
[email protected]
tel.: +420 37 8211 261

SPRO - SD - Billing - Billing Plan - the first 5 config nodes (Define Billing Plan types / Define Date descriptions / Assign Date categories / Maintain Date Proposals / Assign Billing Plan types to Sales Doc types) are applicable to you.
this is pretty tranparent for a reference.
What else is required?

Supplier Bank Accounts, unable to view banking details at site level - R12

Hi All,
I've loaded Supplier banks & branches, and linked bank account with supplier through API.
However, when I query on the Supplier Banking Details screen (Payables Super User > Suppliers > Inquiry > Suppliers > Banking Details) and select Site for account assignment level and select the site name, I do not see anything.
From the backend tables, I can see the bank accounts created and linked to suppliers. However, nothing is displayed after querying there or on the Search Supplier Bank Account Assignment screen either.
Is it a configuration / setup / profile / security setting that's preventing the records from being displayed on the screen?
Any help / advise is appreciated - apps version R12.1.3
Thanks in advance,
LG

Using the overloaded version of the API appears to add a bank account that's displayed by the user interface in Vendors. No warranties since I can't explain why (just guess). Association value appears to be S for supplier and SS for site.
set serveroutput on
DECLARE
lv_return_status varchar2(1);
lv_msg_count number;
lv_msg_data varchar2(2000);
l_bank_id number;
l_branch_id number;
l_end_date date;
l_start_date date;
l_acct_id number;
l_response IBY_FNDCPT_COMMON_PUB.Result_rec_type;
l_bank_acct_rec apps.iby_ext_bankacct_pub.extbankacct_rec_type;
BEGIN
l_bank_acct_rec.bank_id := 14761;
l_bank_acct_rec.branch_id := 662490;
l_bank_acct_rec.country_code := 'US';
l_bank_acct_rec.bank_account_name := 'YOUNG DAVID 2';
l_bank_acct_rec.bank_account_num := '9999990380';
l_bank_acct_rec.currency := 'USD';
l_bank_acct_rec.acct_type := 'CHECKING';
select party_id into l_bank_acct_rec.acct_owner_party_id
from AP.ap_suppliers where segment1 = '18606407610';
IBY_EXT_BANKACCT_PUB.create_ext_bank_acct (
p_api_version => 1,
p_ext_bank_acct_rec => l_bank_acct_rec,
x_acct_id C,
--x_start_date     => l_start_date,
--x_end_date          => l_end_date,
x_return_status => lv_return_status,
x_msg_count => lv_msg_count,
x_msg_data => lv_msg_data,
x_response => l_response
IBY_EXT_BANKACCT_PUB.create_ext_bank_acct (
p_api_version => 1,
p_init_msg_list => FND_API.G_FALSE,
p_ext_bank_acct_rec => l_bank_acct_rec,
p_association_level => 'S' ,
p_supplier_site_id => null ,
p_party_site_id => null ,
p_org_id => 1712,
p_org_type          =>     'OPERATING_UNIT',
x_acct_id => l_acct_id,
x_return_status => lv_return_status,
x_msg_count => lv_msg_count,
x_msg_data => lv_msg_data,
x_response => l_response
dbms_output.put_line(lv_return_status||'-'||lv_msg_count||'-'||lv_msg_data|| '-' || l_acct_id);
dbms_output.put_line(l_response.Result_Code ||'-'||l_response.Result_Message );
end;
/

Ship-to party details at item level

Hi friends,
I am using SAP version 4.7. In a sales order, Ship-to party is different at header level and item level. When I go to the sales order item overview and click on a particular item and in the partners tab, I see a different customer under ship-to party partner function. The problem here is that though the partner no. is different, details such as name, street are getting picked from header level ship-to-party. Suppose, at header level, ship-to party is '1', and at item level ship-to party is '2'. In the details of ship-to party at item level, I am getting '1's name and street details.
I have checked OSS notes but,could not find any relevent note for my sap version and package,
Please suggest what could be the solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Vishnu Priya

Hi Vishnu,
In sales, ship-to party is never mentioned in header..( u can chk out in table VBAK-->header sales table)..only sold-t party is mentioned..this is because one sale can have many different consignees for different items but for the same customer... also, ship-to party can also be same as te sold-to party...so that may be the reson u r getting the same address for both...
hope it helps,
Regards,
Bikash

Filter of viewing details at BEx level possible?

Hi Guys
I would like to know if we can filter the users to view records only related to him and the users who is working under him and no other users at Report design level OR it is possible only by assigning roles to the users under Tcode PFCG.
Thansk & Regards,
Rohini

Hi!
Thanks Somnath and Antonino
I got another query on this.Lets me explian you what is mainted at our system.
There is a auhtorization object maintained in Tcode RSSM, then there are 3 roles maintained at Tcode PFCG. but for one of the role that is manager role no authorization is maintained. And in the Query the same info object is used as authorization variable.
So here one thing is not clear to me is where is the data filtered depending upon the user. Like when the user is manager then he is able to his details and the users direct reporting to him and when the user is general user then he is able to details only related to him. And both this users are viewing the same reports. how and where is this filtering of data happening?
Thanks & Regards,
Rohini

Row and Column Level Select Permission

Hello Friends,
I am using Oracle Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 and Windows XP. I have two questions. How to set :
1. Row Level Select Permission?
2.Column Level Select Permission?
1. I have a table having 100 records in it. I don’t want to allow all the user to see them; means, if user1, user2 and user3 are going to select * from mytable then only they can get all the rows; while other users (including sys) should not able to get all rows, they should be capable of from 11th record.
Though it can be managed by using another table, but I am just finding the other solution.
2. Likewise, if I don’t want to allow to fetch all the columns; suppose column4 is having confidential info and only be visible by user1,user2 and user3 only, not by any othr user; what should I do?
Please guide and help me.
Regards

You would need to use Virtual Private Database (VPD)/ row level security (RLS) to apply row-level security policies to the table. The DBMS_RLS package is used for this
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14258/d_rls.htm#sthref6168
Unfortunately, column-level security wasn't available in 9.2. You would need to upgrade to Oracle 10g to get that functionality. Before that, you would have to create views that selected appropriate subsets of columns and grant permissions on those views to different users.
Justin

SharePoint 2013 check permissions unable to find permission level for AD user

In our environment for SharePoint AD groups are associated with individual AD members and AD group is given access to SharePoint group with a permission level. When I want to check for a user who are part on the AD group using check permission to find their
SharePoint permission level it returns "none", but when I check what permission level the AD group has check permission returns correct permission level.
I am not sure if this is the right behavior for SharePoint 2013 not to display individual AD user permission using check permission, business users have to request IT every time they have to find a user permission level.

Hi,
As far as I know, the user permissions which set in AD Groups is not updated immediately to SharePoint Site. The AD group informations are converted into claims and packed into security token issued by the STS (Security Token Service).
For troubleshooting your issue,you can configure the Token Cache to a smaller value and check the permission level of the user who is granted permissions through AD group:
https://sergeluca.wordpress.com/2013/07/06/sharepoint-2013-use-ag-groups-yes-butdont-forget-the-security-token-caching-logontokencacheexpirationwindow-and-windowstokenlifetime/
Thanks,
Eric
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Permission Details of Permission Level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for