PLA-AT2 amount 24.12.2009 is greater than available amount

Dear all,
I have an issue in Production while doing J1IEX....
While capturing of Part 2 value in J1IEX, the system gives the following issue..."PLA-AT2 amount 24.12.2009 is greater than available amount"
Kindly any one give the solution.....
thanks and regards,
Mohan.M

Closed.
We should not give greater than date of MIGO. We should give MIGO transaction date.

Similar Messages

Component Qty in PO for Subcontracting is greater than available in stock

Dear Gurus,
i have an issue regarding Subcontracting. When i create a Purchase Order, i use Item Category L. In the Compoenent i specify the material and the Requirement Quantity. Req Qty which i specify in PO is greater than the Qty available in Stock.
How do i restrict the user to enter only the Quantity that is available in Stock for the Component provided to the Vendor.
Thanks,
Johi.

the next MRP run will create a requisition or planned order to get more quantity for the component., if you are short of material.
do you just plan to produce as much as you have components for, or do you plan to satisfy a customers need?

PLA-AT2

Hi Experts,
We have posted goods receipt on 27/4/2009. We got excise on 28/5/2009. While capturing excise invoice in t code j1iex for goods receipt we are getting error that
PLA-AT2 amount 28.05.2009 is greater than available amount
Message no. 8I659
While capturing excise the document date is 28/5/2009 & posting date is 19/6/2009. Kindly explain why this error is coming?
Thank you
Sap MM

Hi,
Check the dates (document and posting) in your Goods Receipt document and the excise invoice.
The excise invoice date should be always an earlier date than the MIGO posting date.
Please check the migo posting date and the excise invoice date and revert back.
The Posting date of the GR and the Document date of the Excise Capturing should be adjusted.
Regards,
Vikas

Amount to credit greater than credit balance - goods return to AP Cred Note

Hi All,
I've got the following scenario:
We have a AP Goods Return on the system which totals £12.94 with freight charges of -£3.75. We have copied this to a AP Credit Note, but have amended the freight from -£3.75 to -£3.00(UK VAT Rate 15% applicable throughout). The total credit field now shows £13.80 and the credit balance field shows £12.94. When you try to add the document it gives an error "amount to credit greater than credit balance". I'm using 2005A PL53.
Can anyone please advise the reason behind the error and also what the correct way of handling this kind of transaction would be?
Kind regards,
Matt

Hi Wesley,
I tried both methods and it doesn't resolve the issue. Spoke to SAP, they gave me a solution and workaround, the issue is a bit more complicated as what it may seem. You manually have to close the goods return, create a standalone service credit note with the appropriate GL account to reverse out the "goods clearing account" entry created by the reversal journal. The bahaviour has been changed in SBO 2007 and therefore the problem is not present in this version anymore. Thanks for your help anyway.
Kind regards,
Matt
Edited by: Greeff Matt on Jun 5, 2009 9:47 AM

F-32 Partial payment amount greater than net amount

Hi Experts,
We have recently a problem in clearing up payments in F-32. When we double-click the item under Partial Payment Tab, the warning message displays "Partial payment amount greater than net amount" then the value in the Payment Amount Column becomes negative. The users need to activate 2 separate entries for partial payment but instead of . How can we do this?
We have to post like this in partial payment under same customer:
20090820     1400005790     DZ     19     20.08.2009     20.08.2009     5,000.00-     1,295.12
20110225     1400010330     DZ     19     25.02.2011     25.02.2011     2,000.00-     1,295.12-
So the the Assigned Value should be zero to post.

Thanks @Atif. Ok so now I understand that the "Total Difference Posting" amount inf-32 will create the new amount of the residual payment with Document Type AB.
Now with the Warning Message "Partial Payment Amount greater than the net amount", this is in a overpayment amount that is reflected in transaction F-32, here are the entries:
Assignment Doc Num      Doc Type      Post Key    Net Amt         Partially Paid Amt Payment Amt
2133004220     90005448     RV     01     3,707.02      3,305.71      401.31
2133015007     90020098     RV     01     7,836.68      6,737.25      1,099.43
2133016757     90022362     RV     01     10,521.31      8,603.87      1,917.44
2133137046     90187172     RV     01     11,367.68      0.00      11,367.68
2133137047     90187173     RV     01     1,354.09      0.00      1,354.09
2133137048     90187174     RV     01     1,739.82      0.00      1,739.82
2133137049     90187175     RV     01     994.57      0.00      994.57
20110419     90187176     RV     01     6.42      0.00      6.42
20110421     90187177     RV     01     44.94      0.00      44.94
20110425     90187178     RV     01     19.26      0.00      19.26
20081216     1400003657     DZ     19     3,421.86-     3,394.04-     27.82-
20081222     1400003706     DZ     19     1,000.00-     1,033.17-     33.17-
20090310     1400004396     DZ     19     420.51-     401.25-     19.26-
20090630     1400005319     DZ     19     786.13-     705.94-     80.19-
20090702     1400005349     DZ     19     596.04-     535.88-     60.16-
20090820     1400005790     DZ     19     5,000.00-     6,295.12-     1,295.12-
20090824     1400005827     DZ     19     308.16-     295.32-     12.84-
20091027     1400006377     DZ     19     400.72-     375.04-     25.68-
20091215     1400006796     DZ     19     349.89-     337.05-     12.84-
20100608     1400008253     DZ     19     200.09-     189.39-     10.70-
20101019     1400009279     DZ     19     165.85-     155.00-     10.85-
20101019     1400009280     DZ     19     254.65-     238.00-     16.65-
20101019     1400009281     DZ     19     160.64-     157.00-     3.64-
20101130     1400009595     DZ     19     10,000.00-     5,440.92-     4,559.08-
How is this possible that Document numbers 1400003706 and 1400005790 has overpaid amount. And both of them are downpayment documents? Is there any way I can clear them with the Invoices, I am also lost with this kind of scenario?

Error Message FF747 -The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

Hello,
We are attempting to post an import vendor invoice through transaction FB60 for Israel company code . Since the tax charged by the vendor is not fixed every time , we are entering the tax amount in the FB60 screen manually , without selecting 'calculate tax'.The amount of tax is greater than the amount of expense as per the real business scenario. For example amount of expense is 100, amount of tax is 200 and the total amount charged by the vendor is 300 .However when we simulate the posting we get an error - The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base-Message no. FF747
We tried putting a very high percentage in the tax code also but it didn't help
We would like to go ahead with this posting. Could you pl throw light on the same . ? Is there any way (OSS note ) or a work around which can resolve the issue ?
Best Regards
Amit Kulkarni

Hello
This may be a work around in other cases , but since we want the amount to be updated in the BSET table for further VAT reports , we would like this to be posted along with the expense item

Payment Amount is greater than invoice amount in sales order

Hi experts:
I have a Sales order that contained originally 3 lines of which the first 2 lines was delivered totally and the third was delivered partially.
The client decided to change the remaining quantity for another reference so the procedure in the sales order was to add another line and try to close the third line by right click and "close row" but the option is not available because there is a partial delivery, so the option was to update the inicial quantity in the third line at the same as delivered and update.
Like a result a I could close the third line and leave a fourth line available to delivery, however when I open this Sales order again an try to update a message "payment amount is greater than invoice amount" and appears inmediately the "Deposit on Order" window.
Other Information: The quantities delivered was invoiced but no payment has been received.
Checking in the SCN I have not found some related information with this case because the existing answers are related with incomming and outgoing payments but like I mentioned before this docuements already have not payments.
In relation with the decimal places, my original decimal places configuration was 2 and it was updated to 3, issue that neither is mentioned in previous answers.
I will appreciate your help,
Thanks,
Manuel

Hi Manuel,
Your case is complicated by the fact you have not only undated the Sales Order which is partially delivered but also updated decimal places during the process. In this case, you are probably the best person to figure out what is the system expected number. You may restore your production db to test environment first. Then do whatever you could to fix the problem. If no solution can be found, you have to log a message to SAP support.
A general advice: do not fight with system for what you think system should accept.
Thanks,
Gordon

Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error

Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error when doing incoming payment
regards
kavitha S

Hi Kavitha,
please check in the OINV table the balance due on the invoice. This amount has to match the payment. If the problem is due to different decimal places & you are using a version lower than 2007 you will be able to change the decimal places for this particular payment. If you are using 2007, you will no longer be able to reduce the number of decimal places. In that case you could check out SAP note 1321183 & verify with your accountant that the workaround may be used.
All the best,
Kerstin

Payment amount greater than net amount!

Payment amount greater than net amount! , i am receiving this error while doing partial payment.. plz help
Also reversed documents are not coming in partial payment tab in F-53 but it is showing as a open item in vendor balance.....

/hi,
First of all Check ur Clearig GL i.e Bank /Cash in that Relevant to cash Flow is ticked or not.If not ticked then tick it and then try again.
thanks
deepa

The amount charged to our credit card was greater than the amount on our invoice.

This last month, our credit card was charged was charged an amount greater than what appeared on our invoice. Why did this happen, and how can we get a refund of the difference?

Yes, of course that's what I tried first. I attempted to use the Contact Support box in the lower right corner of:
https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/topics/getting-started.html
And got this:
We're sorry, but our records indicate you aren't eligible for this support option.
Experts are always available in our free community forums.
Hence my post here.
However, it appears that the URL you provided takes me to a completely different chat application, so perhaps I'll have better luck there. I'll give it a try.
Thanks for your help.

GR Cancellation amount greater than GR?

Hi Expert,
May I know in what situation the GR cancellation amount is greater than GR in PO history?
I am facing a problem that:
1. Create a PO for 4 pcs of Material A, 1000 USD total.
2. IV for the material A, 4 pcs also, 1000 USD. The date of IV was before the GR date.
3. GR (mvt type 101) material A, for 3 pcs, but is 250 USD.
4. GR cancellation (mvt type 102) material A for 4 pcs, 1000 USD.
This confuse me a lot because as I know we cannot maintain the material value in GR for PO, why mvt type 101 will come out a 250 USD?
I try to create the same senario again but everything is all right now without any setting. The MIGO also doesn't has a field for me to maintain price.
Any idea?
Thanks~!

from where exactly (which transaction, which field) did you pull the data?
4 pcs with a total of 1000 is just 250 per piece.
The 250 that you see for the movement, is that the price or the total value for the 3?
Usually SAP valuates the goods receipt with the invoice price if the IR was done before the GR, otherwise the GR is valuated with the PO price.
The reversal is done with the moving average.
You hide information in this example, as it is not logical to receive 3 but cancel 4.

Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error when doing AR CN

Dear Experts,
I am trying to post an AR CN on an AR Downpayment Invoice. This AR Downpayment Invoice has not been applied to its invoice yet, status is hence OPEN.
I now go to AR CN and use Copy From function to browse for this AR Downpayment Invoice, when I try to post this Credit Note, I receive the below error:
"Payment amount is greater than invoice amount [Message 439-4]"
Any advice?
Much thanks in advance!
Warmest Regards,
Chinho

You may check SAP note 1025708, 979611 and this thread:
Payment amount is greater than invoice amount
Thanks,
Gordon

The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

Hi Experts,
User is trying to "Relase to Account" in t-code VF01 he is getting an error message The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base.
During Debuging i found the error is raised in Function module RV_ACCOUNTING_DOCUMENT_CREATE
Message raised is
Message Class : FF
Message number: 747
Mesage "The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base"
Request to through some lights on this issue.
Reagrds
Sree

Hi,
did you check SAPNET notes with "VF01" and the message class/number as search terms. There are some notes dealing with this case eg 872449, and 184985.
Best regards, Christian

Service entry amount is greater than PO amount

Hi all,
This is an example of the issue:
Service PO created with quantity 1 and price 1000.00. PO amount 1000.00
Service entry entered , quantity 1, amount 1000.00. GR amount 1000.00
Then PO changed, qty is 1000 and price 1. PO amount 1000.00
another Service entry is entered, quantity 999, amount 999.00. GR amount 999.00
After these 2 service entries, the PO quantity is 1000, price 1, PO amount 1000.00 and service entry amount of 1999.00
The invoices are received and no blocked for payment.
Any idea of what to do?
Regards,
CD

Hi,
Message M8 -081( for quantities invoiced greater than goods receipt quantity) is set as E (error) in OMRM & OBMSG t.codes.
Please check again in your system,1st try in sandbox,then do in DEV client & transport TR and then test in testing client.
Also try setting error messages for SE-363 & SE-781 in following path:
SPRO- >Material Management->External Services Management->Define Attributes of System Messages
After check & setting all, go for fresh transactions.
Regards,
Biju K

Block Invoice amount greater than PO amount

Dear Expert,
Currently, I set a tolerance (incoming invoice--> define vendor-specific tolerance) to allow user to post Invoice greater than Amount received (case is PO service for partial receive). However, we want that it will block user to post invoice more then the total value of PO.
Currently, if I set the tolerance limit, then it's possible to post invoice More than PO value as long as the variance is under its tolerance limit.
Any advice?
thanks,
nasikhin

Hi Ajit,
thanks for your reply, could you please tell us which transaction key?? i've tried PP, BD, LA but nothing works.
Moreover, I wonder if the price variance occured because of this tolerance could be posted to the particular Expense/Inventory instead of new GL account for price variance.
Currently, it's posted to the GL account I set up on OBYC for transaction DIF..
And when I lookup to the PO history, the invoice amount is the same with amount received, although the real invoice amount is over.
Any suggestion will be very appreciated.
Thanks,
Nasikhin

PLA-AT2 amount 24.12.2009 is greater than available amount

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for