Planned revenues on WBS element

Hello,
I have a problem in that my WBS elements are not recognizing planned revenue from its adjoining sales order. I have checked everything from a PS point of view such as planning profile etc... and all looks okay. I have also checked the AcctdetermProc. on the Billing type "KOFI00", the billing type on the sales document type and the billing relevance "I" on the item category. There are no issues with credit control. I have also reviewed many notes such as 96404 without any success.
Could you please suggest other problems that may be causing it and how to go about fixing it
Many thanks,
Ashleigh Crosher
[email protected]

Hello Ashleigh Crosher,
This is with referance to your similar problem in WBS not recognizing planned revenues (Sales Pricing). As per your steps even I have checked all the setting in PS as well in SD but still not able to short out the problem. Can you please let me know is your problem solved, if yes then let me know how to solve it.
Thanks & Regards,
Tushar

Similar Messages

Planning Layout for WBS Elements

Any one have any idea how to set up the planning layout for WBS ELEMENTS & COST CENTER?
We are trying to plan for WBS elements and Cost center through CJR2 but I don't have any layout designed for this.
Any ideas or suggestions?

I doubt if you can have a single layout for planning both at Cost Centre and WBS level.
But you can create your own layout by copying the standard planning layout under a different name and then change the copy (T code OPO1)
We in our project created a layout with WBS Element (PSPGR) and Cost Element (KAGRU) as Characteristic Values with lead column structure 'Characteristic value and name'.
You then create/assign a Planner Profile>Planning Area>Planning layout using T Code KP34.
Call/change your planner profile (T code KP04) to above before doing the cost planning in CJR2.
Regards
Sreenivas

Revenue in WBS element

Hello experts
My question is if we post actual revenue on WBS element, does it increases the budget or have any impact on budget availability control
Regards
Asif

No impact on the Budget.
Regards
Raman T S

Function modules or BAPI for posting plan costs for WBS Element

Hi all,
Does anyone know, whether there exists a function module or BAPI for posting plan costs to a WBS Element? K_COSTS_PLAN_PS does not work, because RKP1 is not allowed.
Greetings

check
BAPI_COSTACTPLN_POSTACTINPUT   Activity Input Planning: Posting
BAPI_COSTACTPLN_POSTACTOUTPUT Activity/Price Planning: Posting
BAPI_COSTACTPLN_POSTKEYFIGURE Stat. Key Figure Planning: Postings
BAPI_COSTACTPLN_POSTPRIMCOST   Primary Cost Planning: Postings
BAPI_PDTRANSCO_POSTPRIMCOST    Transfer of Planning Data: Post Primary Costs
K40C                           CO Actual Postings, Manual
BAPI_ACC_PRIMARY_COSTS_POST    Accounting: Post Primary Costs
BAPI_COPAACTUALS_POSTCOSTDATA BAPI Operating Concern: Post Costing-Based Actua
BAPI_PRIM_COST_CHECK_AND_POST Primary Costs: Formal Parameter Check
S@meer

Does sales order assigned to WBSe increases plan value of WBS element

Hello Experts,
In my project, planning is done using activities, so ideally CN41 report displays the plan values (Proj.cost sched.000) for the network and the WBS assigned to the netwok is same.
E.g. 1000 USD planned for network = 1000 USD planned for the WBSe.
But for one of the project, I see the WBS planned value is more than that of Network though we plan only in NTW.
I can see a sales order assiged to this WBSe for which sales order billing value 1500 USD displayed in CN41 in revenue plan column.
Is there anything like sales order planning? the billing value is for revenue generation but does sales order planning also required? like to complete the sales order, how much is my plan cost? does the sales order plan cost gets updated in the WBS plan cost?
I am asking this question becasue if i look in CJ41 (Display WBS planning) I can see all the cost displayed in the column Order/network
Please clarify me on the sales order assignment.
Regards,

Thanks for the reply and clearing my doubt on sales order.
my problem is as below:
Cost planned on the network: 1000 USD
as in my project, planning is done only on NTW, CN41 report should show:
Project Object---- Proj.cost sched.000
WBS.0001------ 1000 USD
Network --- 1000 USD
however, CN41 report is showing as below:
Project Object---- Proj.cost sched.000
WBS.0001------ 1100 USD
Network --- 1000 USD
I can see that the 100 USD are directly planned on the WBSe if I see the values as non aggregated but I am not able to understand how 100 USD are planned on the WBSe.
If I see CJ41, I can see Planned 1100 USD under the column Order/network
This means that all 1100 usd's are planned using orders/network.
Please help me understanding why there is a difference of 100 USd's at network and WBS level and how to find out where the additional 100 USDs are planned on WBSe.
Thanks

Error while uploading plan revenue -CJR2

Hi All,
I am facing one issue while uploading Plan revenue for wbs elements using excel method for CJR2 transaction. What i m doing is , in project structure i have 1st , 2nd & 3rd level WBSe, 2nd level WBSe is relevant for billing and revenue planning. Therefore i have marked 2nd level WBSe as a billing element and to restrict revenue plan i have maintained a relevant user status at 1st and 3rd level WBSe. In upload file i am only giving 2nd level WBSe but when i execute i am getting an error that user status XXXX is set on 1st level & 3rd level WBSe which restrict revenue planning. I also removed 'Bottom up planning" indicator from planning profile.
My reason of worry is even though i have not maintained 1st and 2nd level WBSe in upload file then why and how system is checking 1st and 2nd level WBSe .
Any clue is highly appreciated.
Thanks.

Hi Varun,
In my query i have mentioned that user status is set on 1st & 3nd level WBSE only and i am doing revenue planning on 2nd level WBSE( to this WBSE there is no user status ). And i am mentioning 2nd level WBSE only in upload file but system is checking 1st and 3rd level WBSE and giving error and this is my point of worry. It should not look for 1st and 3rd level WBSE. And i do not want to change the user status at 1st and 3rd level WBSE.
Thanks

Planning on WBS elements without cost elements

Hi all,
we are trying to implement the planning solution where users will be able to plan on individual WBS elements monthly but without providing a breakdown on cost elements. Standard SAP planning profiles allow to post plan values on WBS elements in annual view without cost elements. But when you want a monthly view the system you need to click on primary cost elements planning first.
Is there any way to plan monthly but at cost object (WBS) level only?
Many thanks,
Roman

Hi Eli,
thanks for your response. We will be using budget functionality for budget purposes but at the same time we will need to use planning on different versions. I believe there are no versions for budget.
One of the idea to minimize cost element planning is to introduce like a planning cost element to use with all planning postings and then include this into the same cost element group with the rest of cost elements for plan/actuals comparison reports.
If you have something in your mind I would appreciate your input.
Thank you,
Roman

WBS element and Plan value

All,
How can i fetch PLAN values for WBS element.
Any function module or tables related to this
a®

Sorry about not giving much details in the first thread
Requirment is fetch all field content (records) WOG001 WOG002 upto WOG016 related to WBS element.
I think WOG001 - WOG016 represent the plan details ?
a®

Plan cost in wbs is as per std cost of material

Hi All
We have created a sales order having billing type as a rental
(4 quarters of 4500 value each) and in pricing conditions, the value is
1500.
We have done account assignment of WBS element to it for getting
revenues figures on it.
When we run the report of cost and revenue on WBS element, then the
planned revenue figures is appearing as only 1500 X 4 = 6000.
Actually it should have been 4500 X 4 = 18000.
System is just fetching the value from pricing condition and
multiplying it with the number of line items on billing plan and
showing it as a planned value figure.
This is creating a serious problem of getting planned revenue figures
for WBS Element on rental type of billing and showing a wrong report.
The report is S_ALR_87013531
Request you all to pls help me out.
Regards
Parimal

Check the sequence in which price is searched in the valuation variant.

FI posting not allowed for WBS Element

Hi All,
While doing down payment billing I'm getting error that FI posting is not allowed for WBS element. But FI periods are open for all months in 2008.
Please suggest how to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Harish

Hello
Account assignment
If you want to post actual costs and commitments to a WBS element, you have to indicate that the WBS element is an account assignment element in the WBS. All objects that can be assigned costs and commitments within a project (for example, orders, networks, or purchase orders) can only be assigned to a WBS element if you have set the account assignment indicator for the element.
In Customizing for the Project System, you can set an indicator to specify that costs are planned for all WBS elements or only for specific WBS elements.
Billing
If you want to post revenues to a WBS element, you have to indicate that the WBS element is a billing element in the WBS.
Reg
assign points if useful

RA - Planned Revenue

Hi,
I am facing a problem while running of RA
1. Sales Order Created - Project Created in Back Ground
2. Incurred actual cost/revenue
3. Running RA for Project
When I run RA it is not showing the Sales Value as Planned Revenue,
but it is showing in the s_alr_87013531
Please help me.
Thanking you
Shareeq

Assalamu Alaikkum Muzammil,
Overall Plan is E. RA Type - E.
Planned Cost in CJ40 for WBS Element is 105.
Planned Revenue in WBS--Sales Order is 120.
But RA shows Planned Cost 105 and Planned Revenue 105 if Overall Plan is M in OKG3.
If I am correct , Planned Cost Should be 105 and Planned Revenue should be 120. Correct me if am wrong.
Thanks
Regards,
Shareeq
Edited by: K M AHAMED SHAREEQ HUSSAIN on Feb 9, 2010 12:06 PM
Edited by: K M AHAMED SHAREEQ HUSSAIN on Feb 9, 2010 12:06 PM

WBS Element vs investment order

Good Day,
Please can someone explain the following..................
I have CO objects a WBS element and an investment order and I have posted budgeted values to these CO Objects. I have posted actual values to these Co object via the MM and FI-AA module.
When I display the budgeted values for the WBS Element and the invesment order for the fields BPJA-WTJHR the vaules are positive. Once the actual values are posted to the WBS Element and investment order the values are displayed differently on the table COSP-(WTG001-WTG016).
For the WBS Element the values are dispalyed as negative on table COSP -(WTG001-WTG016) and for the investment order the values are displayed as postive but both values for the different CO objects are expenditure which has occured via the MM and FI-AA modules Therefore can someone please explain to me why these values are displayed differently yet the budgeted values are displayed the same.
Your soonest response would be appreciated.
Kind Regards
Ropetra

Hi
please gop through this notes it may be help full for you...............
Planning and Budgeting Measures
Use
Using this function, you can plan and budget investment measures, even if they are not already assigned to an investment program.
Integration
All of the planning and budgeting functions of orders or projects are at your disposal for the corresponding measures. For more information, see the documentation for the R/3 components, Internal Orders (CO-OM-OPA) and Project System (PS) .
Orders or WBS elements that are assigned to investment programs cannot receive their overall budget by means of the budgeting functions in CO and PS, when the Budget distribution indicator is set in the program position to which they are assigned. Instead, they are limited to receiving their overall budget only by means of the budgeting functions in Investment Management.
Prerequisites
Certain restrictions apply when an investment program type is entered in the budget profile of an order or WBS element. When this is the case, the order or WBS element cannot receive overall budget unless you assign it (or a higher-level WBS element ) to an investment program position. Until you make this assignment to a program position, the fields for the overall budget and/or annual budget for orders or WBS elements are not ready for input and cannot be changed.
Activities
To plan or budget orders, choose Internal orders ® Planning ® Overall values ® Change or Budget ® Original budget ® Change.
To plan or budget WBS elements, choose Investment projects ® Planning ® Total costs ® Change or Budgeting ® Original budget ® Change.

Planning Layout for WBS

Any one have any idea how to set up the planning layout for WBS ELEMENTS,COST CENTER,?
We are trying to plan for WBS elements and Cost center through CJR2 but I dont have any layout designed for this.
Any ideas or suggestions?

I doubt if you can have a single layout for planning both at Cost Centre and WBS level.
But you can create your own layout by copying the standard planning layout under a different name and then change the copy (T code OPO1)
We in our project created a layout with WBS Element (PSPGR) and Cost Element (KAGRU) as Characteristic Values with lead column structure 'Characteristic value and name'.
You then create/assign a Planner Profile>Planning Area>Planning layout using T Code KP34.
Call/change your planner profile (T code KP04) to above before doing the cost planning in CJR2.
Regards
Sreenivas

Plan and Actual at WBS Elements without activities

Hi Experts,
I am in need of a small help from you. My scenario is like this:
I have equipments/material as WBS Elements( Level1,2...). I have no activities/materials.
I planned the costs using CJ40 and Budgeted using CJ30 and confirmed all the WBS Elements by entering actual dates for the same.
Now i want to see planned/actuals costs in report. When i checked in one standard report it is showing 0 for both planned and actuals.
I also want to have a brief step-by step procedure for Project with only WBS Elements, i.e., from Initiation to Settlement.
Can anyone please help me in this regard.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Suresh.D.

The following is in answer to
"I also want to have a brief step-by step procedure for Project with only WBS Elements, i.e., from Initiation to Settlement."
Most probable scenario would consist of following steps
Create PDef - Create WBS (either copying from template or manually) - Plan costs - Roll up planned costs - Budget (at top level) - Budget distribute - budget Release - WBS release - Post actual costs - run cost / revenue variance report - settle costs against the WBS - TECO project - Close Project.
I believe I haven't missed on any important aspect.
Would appreciate inputs from others in this effort.
Hope this information was useful.
Regards,
Pradyumna

Issue with order or sequence of wbs elements appearance in planning layout

Hi Experts
we have an issue with order or sequence of wbs elements appearance in BPS planning layout.
In BW - 0wbs element - hierarchy order is as below
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
but when we check the same wbs element in BPS planning layout, it appears as below
1
2
3
4
6
7
5
8
Request you to advice how to correct the order.
Best Regards
krishna

Hi,
I came across a similar situation once. I dont remember exactly.
We have two different DataSources on wbs hierarchy. The hiearchy was loaded using the two datasources.
By mistake we were trying to use the hierarchy created by Datasource2, instead of hier created by datasource1.
Can you check that.

Planned revenues on WBS element

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for