Plant n storage location control

Hi all,
how can we control the plant and storage location control?
If I creaet PO for one plant, I must not create PO to other plant.
Thanks

Hi,
You have created PO for ONE plant only, but one plant have multiple storage location and also created PO to multiple storage location in one purchase order based on authorization.
Plant and storage location control through authorization of create,edit/change,display,print  of PO.
Hope, it is useful for you.
Regards,
K.Rajendran

Similar Messages

  • Plant and Storage Location determination at Item level during Copy control

    Hello Freinds,
    We are experiencing issues within Sales Order creation when the line item is referencing a contract. The plant and storage location is being determined from the contract - this should not be done, we have an enhancement in place for sales order plant/storage location determination which is how these values should be determined.
    Kindly suggest, if it can be achieved through configuration setting at Copy control level, to avoid the Plant and Storage location determination from Contract in to Sales Order.
    Thanks,
    Anup Bansal

    Hello
    You can mention the additional logic of redetermining Plant and storage location whenever copied from contract.
    In a sale order, i think you are maintaining a enhancement in prog MV45AFZB & user exit userexit_source_determination.
    YOu can maintain the coding at same place.
    thank you
    Anirudh

  • During MRP run unwanted plant and storage location include and exclude

    Hi There,
    During MRP run how to include and exclude the unwanted plant and storage location pls let me know the required configuration settings.
    Thanks in advance.

    HI,
    To control whether a particular storage location will be included or excluded from the MRP run.  (MD02/MD41).
    To exclude it from MRP run :-
    OMIR - Define storage location MRP per plant
    Put the MRP ind. as.         1 - storage location stock excluded for MRP
    To include it from MRP run:-
    OMIR - Define storage location MRP per plant
    Put the MRP ind. as.      space - storage location stock also planned at plant level and save it
    Next go to transaction MM01 - tick only view MRP 2
    Key in Plant and Storage Location
    Look at the Storage Location MRP section
    change the SLoc MRP indicator to space  and save it
    MMD1 - Create MRP Profile - MRP profile is a useful entry aid and makes it easier to manage MRP data.
    You define which fields are filled with values when MRP data is entered in the material master record, which of these values can be overwritten and which not.   You use the information stored in a profile is standard information that is needed again and again in similar constellations when material master records are maintained.
    Regards
    KK

  • Unable to set plant and storage location in Batch as required/mandatory

    Hi Experts,
    I am having a problem regarding field controls.
    I would like to make plant and storage location as mandatory/required in MSC1N,MSC2N,MSC3N and MSC4N.
    I have follow the path below
    SPRO-logistics-general-batch management-bath master-field selection batch master-assign field to field groups
    What i can see is field groups are being assigned to field name.
    My question is, where do we go to to set the field group?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi Dex,
    You have gone to the right location.
    On 'change view field control for batch master record' against each transaction like MSC1, MSC2,MSC3 and MSC4 there are number of dots '............'.
    Double click on each dot against the transaction you want to modify. Each dot corresponds to different fields. Over here you can specify wheter you want to make the field required, optional etc.
    Hope this helps.
    Tarang

  • Storage Location Control and ATP

    Hello Experts,
    I have activated the storage location control for the putaway process and is working fine for MM and WM perspective. The following are happening without any problem:
    1. Doing a GR to the virtual Storage Location and this storage location is blank in TR.
    2. The stock from the virtual storage location is considered in MRP while planning.
    3. TO creation from TR and doing putaway in real storage bin and Transfer posting 311 at IM level.
    The requirement is: The stock from the virtual storage location should not be considered in the ATP while creating a sales order. At the moment, ATP is considering this stock as available and confirming to a date immediately but in reality it should not up until the putaway is complete. And I think this is the sole purpose of having Storage Location Control in place.
    I did my research in this fourm and looked at the Warehouse Management Guide and it says "This means that for the duration of the putaway process, the stock for putaway is either not visible at all or clearly visible as stock that can not be picked, depending on the configuration of the availability check."
    Can someone help me understand what to check or uncheck in ATP? Or should I post this question in the ERP-SD forum?
    Appreciate you help.
    Regards
    Narottam

    Hi,
    I believe your mistake is here:
    "800 K15 0800 8001 411 check box is checked "
    The combination should read
    800 902 0800 8001
    The storage type is the interim storage type, that is where the posting shall happen. And if you leave out the check box it happens automatically.
    But why movement type 411? This usually should be 311.
    Best regards
    Juergen

  • Stock Overview per plant wise/Storage location wise

    hi
        is there any <b>transaction</b> or <b>report</b> to get Stock overview plantwise/ storagelocationwise ... except MMBE it gives particular material.. i want per particular plant or storage location total materials stock.
    I want stock report similar to <b>MMBE</b> it gives available stock per single material in a palnt but my requirement to print available stock per all materials in a given material along with storagelocation wise/batch wise and total quantity.
    Points guaranteed..
    Message was edited by: Ashok Parupalli
    Message was edited by: Ashok Parupalli

    There's quite a lot you can do in Logistics Info Systems to report on stocks across multiple materials.
    Other than that, it depends on what you really want to show - stock that's physically present (e.g. including vendor-owned consignment), stock that you own (e.g. including customer consignment or toll manufacturers' stocks); do you want to show quantities (doesn't usually make much sense for more than one material, of course, due to varying units of measure) or values, etc.
    Some of these data are quite expensive to read from a runtime perspective, in particular the "special" stocks (e.g. consignment).
    You also have to consider that stock you own but that's not physically present on site (e.g. customer consignment), or GR blocked stock, usually is not assigned to a storage location.
    If you give me some more info about what you're actually trying to achieve, I may be able to help you better.

  • Storage location control

    Hi,
    Based on our current requirement, the moment we create a sales order, an out bound delivery and TO should get create automatically, if stock is available. We are successfully acheiving this functionality. But system is creating out bound deliveries for the stock in GR interim area, and failing to create TO, since stock is not available in WH.
    To avoid this, we are trying to use storage location control functionality. With this process we are facing below two problems.
    We could not able set up configuration for multiple IM movemnt type for a storage type
    number two the GR reversal process (with mvt 102) is not working. It is working when we do not confirm the TO which got created due GR posting with mvt 101. But when we confirm the TO and try to cancel material document in IM, WM process not completing.
    Please advice.
    With regards,
    Prabhakar

    >
    prabhakar pisapati wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > Based on our current requirement, the moment we create a sales order, an out bound delivery and TO should get create automatically, if stock is available. We are successfully acheiving this functionality. But system is creating out bound deliveries for the stock in GR interim area, and failing to create TO, since stock is not available in WH.

    > To avoid this, we are trying to use storage location control functionality. With this process we are facing below two problems.
    >
    > We could not able set up configuration for multiple IM movemnt type for a storage type
    > number two the GR reversal process (with mvt 102) is not working. It is working when we do not confirm the TO which got created due GR posting with mvt 101. But when we confirm the TO and try to cancel material document in IM, WM process not completing.
    >
    > Please advice.
    >
    > With regards,
    >
    > Prabhakar
    Your cycle is: Sales order -> outbound delivery (automatic) -> picking of outbound delivery (automatic) -> Confirmation of TO (automatic).
    It appears that in your system, the GR interim area is a separate storage location, and the warehouse is in a different storage location. So your technique of setting picking storage location is correct. 
    The IM movement in standard is 601, and the WM movement is also 601 During picking, the system is trying to pick up stock from the storage type mentioned in the storage type search strategy. If stocks are present there, then a TO will get created and confirmed.
    It is not clear why you require multiple IM movemnt type for a storage type. I am afraid I havent understood your current setup.
    Problem 2: GR reversal not working
    When a GR is done, a 101 IM movement calls a 101 WM movement, and the stock gets moved to a storage type based on the search strategy. When this is cancelled via 102, a 102 WM movement is triggered (in standard). In case this is not happening in your system then you will have to check the problem.
    Try posting the 102 movement material document, and then create the TO against the mat doc using LT06. You will be able to see the problem (TR not created / immediate TO creation not configured / immediate confirmation not set).
    Regards,
    Aroop

  • WM Storage Location control problem - no TR created in receiving warehouse

    Hi all,
    I have configured the system to perform a 311 mvt from sloc 4002 to sloc 0010. Both Slocs have different warehouse numbers assigned.
    The transfer is working fine, however in the receiving warehouse no TR is being generated even though I am using the standard *** 311 movement type which has create TR flag set.
    If I disable the config and perform the 311 in MIGO after confirming the TR in the sending warehouse, the stock is moved to the new warehouse and a TR is created.
    Has anyone experienced this before?
    Mark

    2nd entry in storage location control is ZF2 501 DE01 0010 311 
    1st case:The entry.e. ZF2 501 DE01 0010 311  seems to be wrong.
    Your warehouse storage location 0010 is managed with ZF4 and not ZF2.
    But in this case, the way you created entries concludes that you want to transfer the stock from one Sloc to other Sloc which have separate warehouses.
    i feel your approach to excute this scenario seems to be not a valid one. I don't understand why you are running this process as WM transaction followed by IM document. You said that you are creating the transfer order first.. must be with wm mvt 311 in LT01. Standard WM mvt 311 doesn't allows manual TO creation.Your both storage locations are assigned to different warehouses. You should post the movement in IM first, then follow the WM activities.
    2nd case:If you say that ZF2 is correct, then your storage location is wrong, it should be  4002 instead of 0010  and you are transferring stock from one storage type to other storage within same warehouse.
    If you want to do this scenarion as WM followed by IM, then please change the Wm mvt 311 in ZF2 to allow manual TO creation.
    In movement type properties, set the destination storage type as 501.
    Strorage location control should be ZF2 501 DE01 4002 311
    Please let me know your thoughts on this.
    Regards,
    Santosh

  • Shipping in shipping point from plant and storage location is not possible

    Dear Experts,
    i am trying to configure STO with delivery scenario in my company
    after creating PO (sto UB) and delivery through vl10b when i try to do picking in vl02n and when i enter storage location its giving error
    "shipping in shipping pointxx from plant xxxxand storage location xxxx is not possible"
    i ve checked all settings
    1.plant and sh point assignment
    2. ovl2 sh point determination
    3.ovl3 picking location determination
    4 all master data cust n mat for loading group and shipping cond
    not able to find any solutions plz help
    Regards
    Supriya

    Check your entries in following options in SPRO path:
    IMG - MM - Purchasing - Purchase Order - Set Up Stock Transport Order - Setup Stock Transfer b/w Storage Location - Setup Storage-Location-Specific Shipping Point Determination
    Option 1: Define Rule for Determination of Shipping Point
    Option 2: Assign Shipping Points According to Storage Location (this should be there, if in Option 1 Determin. Rule; Shipping Point is L: Storage-Location-Specific Shipping Point )
    Regards
    JP

  • Material transfers between plants and storage locations report

    Hello experts.
    I´m looking for some help.
    Actually i am looking for a report that show information about material transfers between plants and storage locations. Is there any report that shows the source of the material (plant, storage location) and also shows the target (plant, storage location).
    Thanks for your help.

    Hi,
    Though you may not get report for the same , but you can narrow down the check by using the table MSEG or MB51 using the moment types like 311 643 (sd delivery moments )which are for stock transfers .
    or if you want storage location stock many reports are available like MMBE, or MB53 etc.
    Regards

  • Material is blocked in Plant and storage location due to Physical Inventory

    Dear Experts,
    Our user trying "Post goods issue against 201 movement type,but its giving error message
    "Batch DOM-S(NE) of material 7503020004 is blocked in plant 2000, storage 
       location 2101 due to a physical inventory".     
    we are not using any physical inventory here,give me sugestion.
    i checked physical inventory document MI22,here its doc.status is active.how to solve this issue.    
    Thanks in Advance
    varun

    >
    madhu varun tirupati wrote:
    > Dear Experts,
    > Our user trying "Post goods issue against 201 movement type,but its giving error message
    > "Batch DOM-S(NE) of material 7503020004 is blocked in plant 2000, storage 
    >    location 2101 due to a physical inventory".     
    > we are not using any physical inventory here,give me sugestion.
    >
    > i checked physical inventory document MI22,here its doc.status is active.how to solve this issue.    
    >
    >
    > Thanks in Advance
    >
    > varun
    >
    madhu varun tirupati wrote:
    > Dear Experts,
    > Our user trying "Post goods issue against 201 movement type,but its giving error message
    > "Batch DOM-S(NE) of material 7503020004 is blocked in plant 2000, storage 
    >    location 2101 due to a physical inventory".     
    > we are not using any physical inventory here,give me sugestion.
    >
    > i checked physical inventory document MI22,here its doc.status is active.how to solve this issue.    
    >
    >
    > Thanks in Advance
    >
    > varun
    Dear Experts,
    We have a simulation in our quality server,even though a physical inventory document is existed for the material,doc  status showing active in MI22,but its allowing me to issue goods,but its not allowing in our production system.
    please give

  • Default Plant and storage location for components in MFBF

    Hi,
    I have 2 plants 1000-procurement plant and 2000- production plant. I am using special procurement key 70( Withdrawal from alternative plant from 1000 to 2000) for components in Plant 2000. The requirements for the components are transferred from 2000 plant to 1000 plant. The 1000 plant run MRP for the dependent requirements and procure the materials and transferred to the production storage location in Plant 2000.The raw materials are purchased in plant 1000 and transferred to Plant 2000 production storage location based on the manual reservations created with movement type 301. This is fine.
    But when I do backflush in MFBF the plant and storage location for the components issue are displayed as plant 1000 which is the procurement plant  and the production storage location in plant 2000-production plant location. In the BOM the production storage location is production storage location of plant 2000. Since we use the special procurement key system defaults the plant as 1000(procurement  plant) insteadd of 2000(production plant). can we make this plant default to the production plant 2000 as default in the MFBF goods issue screen.
    thanks and regards
    Murugesan

    Hi MURUGESAN !
          Can you give me some information more in Special Procument Configure in plant 2000 like:
              -  Procurement type (maybe F)
              -  Special procurement (Maybe U)
              -  Plant (Maybe 1000).
              - Issuing plant (maybe 2000)
           We will check together.
           Regards,
          Tony

  • Reg Storage location control when pulled materials via fixed bin replenishm

    We are Using Storagelocation Control Functionality in WM
    We have below Storage locations
    RW01 - Raw Material Storing
    PD01 - Materials staged for Production Lines
    I have setup RW01 as Standard Storage location and PD01 as 'not copied to TR'
    When i try to do bin to bin tranfer raw material to production lines From Bin in RW01 to Bin in PD01, TO has RW01 as expected, i Run posting change background job and this functionality is working fine
    We would be using Fixed bin replenishment strategy to stage materials for productions from raw materials storage
    I run LP21 for PD01, it has created TR but has storage location PD01 instead of RW01.
    PD01 shouldnt have copied as i have set 'Not to be copied to TR' for PD01
    Fixed bin replenishment doesnt support storage location control? does we need to go for customization ?
    Please help

    Please help
    Bin to Bin is working fine as per storage location control functionality set-up
    We have issue with fixed bin replenishment combined with storage location control
    Please share your inputs, Thank you
    While debugging we relaixed SAP doesnt check storage location control config at all while doing fixed bin replenishment, only custom solution to force system to check storage location control config and assign storage location is TR?
    Edited by: Sasi nagireddy on Jul 18, 2011 8:34 AM

  • Creating material in multiple plants and storage locations

    Hi Gurus,
    I am wondering if someone could help me out in this issue,
    I frequently get 1's and 2 materials creation requirement , is there any simple way , while creating material in MM01 , I could create/extend to all plants and storage locations.
    I know we can use LSMW , but this is not bulk requirement,it is frequent but in 1or 2 nos.
    Any help highly appriciated and rewared.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    To my knowledge I doubt if both MM17 & MM50 can meet your need, as MM17 is to mass change the values already existing in the MMR, while MM50 is to extend the views in a given plant & not to extend across plants.
    A suggestion would be to use the BAPI's -
    BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA         Create and Change Material Master Data
    BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEREPLICA      BAPI for Mass Maintenance of Material Data
    Give your requirement to your abaper & inform him / her to use the above BAPI's. I am sure your abaper can write a simple & user friendly program to meet your exact need.
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • Storage location control, storage location ref.

    Hello all,
    I am new in WM,
    Can anyone please explain me the  *_Storage location control function_*  and *Storage location ref* with the exmple in detail.
    Go for this path if required:-
    Spro-- log execution-- warehouse mang- interfaces inventory mang-- Define storage location control..
    Please help me...
    Abhinay Waikar.

    Hi,
    I;'ve used it for the following:
    Standard inbound deliveries to be received in storage location 1000. After finishing the TO in WM, the material is transferred from SLOC 1000 to 1010. In the sales orders, 1010 is taken into account and 1000 is disregarded. I.e. stock in 1000 is not seen as available.
    In this case available stock is indeed available, also in WM.
    MdZ

Maybe you are looking for

  • Downloaded Mountain Lion from App Store, but it says by disk is locked and won't let me choose the hard drive for installation

    I'm struggling to get Mountain Lion installed on my machine, but what is worse is that it has essentially rendered my computer useless (and of course I need to use it urgently). After downloading and installing from the App Store, I have run into som

  • Notes cut off when printing, issue with margins

    When I print a slide with notes, the notes complete cover the width of the page, flush left and right. My printer cuts the margins automatically (not a bleed), so those portions of the text in the notes gets cut off. Any way to control the margins, l

  • Can't auto-create TOC!

    Hi. I'm a noob with RH, and I'm following both our hastily-written internal instructions and the online Help for RH (both of which say basically the same thing in this case). TCS 1.0 on WinXP. I imported the FM book (right-click > Add FrameMaker File

  • Will not load windows

    trying to get comp. bootable or restored to factory if i try to boot from hd in safe mode gets down to mup.sys and stops stays like there till i shut it down i have the restore disks they will only load until setup says "setup is starting windows" th

  • Assignment of order to notification

    Dear Experts A maintenance Order for an equipment is created. And a notification is also created for that equipment individually. Can we assign that Maintenance Order to that Notification? Thanks in Advance Ramesh