Storage Location Control and ATP

Hello Experts,
I have activated the storage location control for the putaway process and is working fine for MM and WM perspective. The following are happening without any problem:
1. Doing a GR to the virtual Storage Location and this storage location is blank in TR.
2. The stock from the virtual storage location is considered in MRP while planning.
3. TO creation from TR and doing putaway in real storage bin and Transfer posting 311 at IM level.
The requirement is: The stock from the virtual storage location should not be considered in the ATP while creating a sales order. At the moment, ATP is considering this stock as available and confirming to a date immediately but in reality it should not up until the putaway is complete. And I think this is the sole purpose of having Storage Location Control in place.
I did my research in this fourm and looked at the Warehouse Management Guide and it says "This means that for the duration of the putaway process, the stock for putaway is either not visible at all or clearly visible as stock that can not be picked, depending on the configuration of the availability check."
Can someone help me understand what to check or uncheck in ATP? Or should I post this question in the ERP-SD forum?
Appreciate you help.
Regards
Narottam

Hi,
I believe your mistake is here:
"800 K15 0800 8001 411 check box is checked "
The combination should read
800 902 0800 8001
The storage type is the interim storage type, that is where the posting shall happen. And if you leave out the check box it happens automatically.
But why movement type 411? This usually should be 311.
Best regards
Juergen

Similar Messages

Storage location control

Hi,
Based on our current requirement, the moment we create a sales order, an out bound delivery and TO should get create automatically, if stock is available. We are successfully acheiving this functionality. But system is creating out bound deliveries for the stock in GR interim area, and failing to create TO, since stock is not available in WH.
To avoid this, we are trying to use storage location control functionality. With this process we are facing below two problems.
We could not able set up configuration for multiple IM movemnt type for a storage type
number two the GR reversal process (with mvt 102) is not working. It is working when we do not confirm the TO which got created due GR posting with mvt 101. But when we confirm the TO and try to cancel material document in IM, WM process not completing.
Please advice.
With regards,
Prabhakar

>
prabhakar pisapati wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Based on our current requirement, the moment we create a sales order, an out bound delivery and TO should get create automatically, if stock is available. We are successfully acheiving this functionality. But system is creating out bound deliveries for the stock in GR interim area, and failing to create TO, since stock is not available in WH.
>
> To avoid this, we are trying to use storage location control functionality. With this process we are facing below two problems.
>
> We could not able set up configuration for multiple IM movemnt type for a storage type
> number two the GR reversal process (with mvt 102) is not working. It is working when we do not confirm the TO which got created due GR posting with mvt 101. But when we confirm the TO and try to cancel material document in IM, WM process not completing.
>
> Please advice.
>
> With regards,
>
> Prabhakar
Your cycle is: Sales order -> outbound delivery (automatic) -> picking of outbound delivery (automatic) -> Confirmation of TO (automatic).
It appears that in your system, the GR interim area is a separate storage location, and the warehouse is in a different storage location. So your technique of setting picking storage location is correct.
The IM movement in standard is 601, and the WM movement is also 601 During picking, the system is trying to pick up stock from the storage type mentioned in the storage type search strategy. If stocks are present there, then a TO will get created and confirmed.
It is not clear why you require multiple IM movemnt type for a storage type. I am afraid I havent understood your current setup.
Problem 2: GR reversal not working
When a GR is done, a 101 IM movement calls a 101 WM movement, and the stock gets moved to a storage type based on the search strategy. When this is cancelled via 102, a 102 WM movement is triggered (in standard). In case this is not happening in your system then you will have to check the problem.
Try posting the 102 movement material document, and then create the TO against the mat doc using LT06. You will be able to see the problem (TR not created / immediate TO creation not configured / immediate confirmation not set).
Regards,
Aroop

WM Storage Location control problem - no TR created in receiving warehouse

Hi all,
I have configured the system to perform a 311 mvt from sloc 4002 to sloc 0010. Both Slocs have different warehouse numbers assigned.
The transfer is working fine, however in the receiving warehouse no TR is being generated even though I am using the standard *** 311 movement type which has create TR flag set.
If I disable the config and perform the 311 in MIGO after confirming the TR in the sending warehouse, the stock is moved to the new warehouse and a TR is created.
Has anyone experienced this before?
Mark

2nd entry in storage location control is ZF2 501 DE01 0010 311
1st case:The entry.e. ZF2 501 DE01 0010 311 seems to be wrong.
Your warehouse storage location 0010 is managed with ZF4 and not ZF2.
But in this case, the way you created entries concludes that you want to transfer the stock from one Sloc to other Sloc which have separate warehouses.
i feel your approach to excute this scenario seems to be not a valid one. I don't understand why you are running this process as WM transaction followed by IM document. You said that you are creating the transfer order first.. must be with wm mvt 311 in LT01. Standard WM mvt 311 doesn't allows manual TO creation.Your both storage locations are assigned to different warehouses. You should post the movement in IM first, then follow the WM activities.
2nd case:If you say that ZF2 is correct, then your storage location is wrong, it should be 4002 instead of 0010 and you are transferring stock from one storage type to other storage within same warehouse.
If you want to do this scenarion as WM followed by IM, then please change the Wm mvt 311 in ZF2 to allow manual TO creation.
In movement type properties, set the destination storage type as 501.
Strorage location control should be ZF2 501 DE01 4002 311
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Regards,
Santosh

Reg Storage location control when pulled materials via fixed bin replenishm

We are Using Storagelocation Control Functionality in WM
We have below Storage locations
RW01 - Raw Material Storing
PD01 - Materials staged for Production Lines
I have setup RW01 as Standard Storage location and PD01 as 'not copied to TR'
When i try to do bin to bin tranfer raw material to production lines From Bin in RW01 to Bin in PD01, TO has RW01 as expected, i Run posting change background job and this functionality is working fine
We would be using Fixed bin replenishment strategy to stage materials for productions from raw materials storage
I run LP21 for PD01, it has created TR but has storage location PD01 instead of RW01.
PD01 shouldnt have copied as i have set 'Not to be copied to TR' for PD01
Fixed bin replenishment doesnt support storage location control? does we need to go for customization ?
Please help

Please help
Bin to Bin is working fine as per storage location control functionality set-up
We have issue with fixed bin replenishment combined with storage location control
Please share your inputs, Thank you
While debugging we relaixed SAP doesnt check storage location control config at all while doing fixed bin replenishment, only custom solution to force system to check storage location control config and assign storage location is TR?
Edited by: Sasi nagireddy on Jul 18, 2011 8:34 AM

Storage location control, storage location ref.

Hello all,
I am new in WM,
Can anyone please explain me the *_Storage location control function_* and *Storage location ref* with the exmple in detail.
Go for this path if required:-
Spro-- log execution-- warehouse mang- interfaces inventory mang-- Define storage location control..
Please help me...
Abhinay Waikar.

Hi,
I;'ve used it for the following:
Standard inbound deliveries to be received in storage location 1000. After finishing the TO in WM, the material is transferred from SLOC 1000 to 1010. In the sales orders, 1010 is taken into account and 1000 is disregarded. I.e. stock in 1000 is not seen as available.
In this case available stock is indeed available, also in WM.
MdZ

Plant n storage location control

Hi all,
how can we control the plant and storage location control?
If I creaet PO for one plant, I must not create PO to other plant.
Thanks

Hi,
You have created PO for ONE plant only, but one plant have multiple storage location and also created PO to multiple storage location in one purchase order based on authorization.
Plant and storage location control through authorization of create,edit/change,display,print of PO.
Hope, it is useful for you.
Regards,
K.Rajendran

Storage Location Control at customer level

Dear All,
Need a Customer wise Storage location control.
Eg.
Customer Name: ABCD
Storage Location: FG01
Customer Name: WXYZ
Storage Location: FG02
Regards,
Saravanan E

Hi,
I am not sure but Explore STOCK DETERMINATION topic,
IMG >> MM >> Inventory management & Physicl inventory >> Define strstegies for stock determination
where define stock determination group and Rule
Assign it header and Item level
On item level maintain storage location and for FG01 - put priority 1 and FG02 - Put priority 2
Assign stock determination rule to Application - Delivery.
check whether it works with batch.
I also update you if working fine.
Kapil

MRP to ecxlude storage location stock and read only requirement

Hi All,
Below is the requirement for raw material,
Have two storage locations A and B.
For storage location A, MRP should exclude stock but has to consider demand's at A (dependent requirements, order reservations) and create MRP elements (purchase requisitions, scheduling agreements etc.).
SLOC B has to consider as normal for MRP (should read demand and stock as well).
Please suggest if it is doable, if yes; how to set the storage location A, so that it just read the demands but exclude stock.
Setting up only "SLOC Indicator" 1 in MRP 4 view is not the option I believe.
Thank you.

Can someone please suggest on below requirement,
How to make the settings at material level so that for a storage location 'A', MRP will just read/consider the demand but exclude the stock.
Is it feasible?
Regards,
Deepak Girme

During MRP run unwanted plant and storage location include and exclude

Hi There,
During MRP run how to include and exclude the unwanted plant and storage location pls let me know the required configuration settings.
Thanks in advance.

HI,
To control whether a particular storage location will be included or excluded from the MRP run. (MD02/MD41).
To exclude it from MRP run :-
OMIR - Define storage location MRP per plant
Put the MRP ind. as.         1 - storage location stock excluded for MRP
To include it from MRP run:-
OMIR - Define storage location MRP per plant
Put the MRP ind. as.      space - storage location stock also planned at plant level and save it
Next go to transaction MM01 - tick only view MRP 2
Key in Plant and Storage Location
Look at the Storage Location MRP section
change the SLoc MRP indicator to space and save it
MMD1 - Create MRP Profile - MRP profile is a useful entry aid and makes it easier to manage MRP data.
You define which fields are filled with values when MRP data is entered in the material master record, which of these values can be overwritten and which not.   You use the information stored in a profile is standard information that is needed again and again in similar constellations when material master records are maintained.
Regards
KK

Put away to production lines directly, storage location control WM

We are Using Storagelocation Control Functionality in WM
We have below Storage locations
RW01 - Raw Material Storing
PD01 - Materials staged for Production Lines
I have setup 001 as Standard Storage location and 002 as 'not copied to TR'
Few materials are received directly to production lines instead of going to Raw material storage
PO--> GR is posted for PD01
Now TR got generated but doesnt have storage location in it, this is fine as per functionality
When i try to convert to TO it is copying MP01 since it it standard storage location
This is where we are getting 902 negative entries for MP01
No TR creation but bin to bin transer only solution ????

Any pointers ???

IW41 - Storage Location Control (User Exit)

Hi,
While I'm trying to use function Goods Movement in PM order confirmation, I only want to consume ingredients from one storage location.
Is there any user exit for this control?
Thank & Regards,
Begum

Hi Venkatesan,
Thanks for your reply. We first try to use the user exit CMFU0002 - Set parameters for time confirmation and goods movements. However, the system doesn't see this user exit while we are trying to consume materials from a storage location.
Best regards,
Begü

FCPX 10.1.4 keeps asking the set Storage Location - over and over, I figure out why

Any have that experience...

You can choose to get the product activated offline: http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/activation-network-issues.html#Activate your software offline
Please refer to :
Sign in, activation, or connection errors | CS5.5 and later
Re: Mac OSX Photoshop CS6 keep asking for serial number
Re: Photoshop CS6, non Creative Cloud, keeps asking me to register
Hope these help you.
Regards
Rajshree

Storage Location level ATP check with CRM

Hi:
I am on an implemenation where the integration is between CRM, EWM and GATP. So, consider the situation where the sales order check is done through CRM and a call to GATP is made.
Some background on supply
EWM would like to receive the goods into storage location ROD (Received On Dock) and then do a movement type to move it to storage location AFS (Available For Sale). The sales orders should consider only the supply from storage location AFS and not ROD.
First question is, is it possible to do a storage location level determination in CRM? I don't think so but wanted to confirm. The reason is because even a plant determination is not possible in CRM when you integrate with GATP (the plant is determined through Rules).
Now, suppose that we have determined the storage location called AFS (in gATP through enhancement) and will do an ATP only at that level in GATP. Suppose that the first plant that will be checked is Plant A and then based on the location determination procedure, the next plant that will be checked is Plant B. When the system checks supply at Plant B, then the question is this: will it still check only at storage location AFS in Plant B or will it check at the plant level? The requirement will be to check at the same storage location level (which means that whatever process we used to determine the storage location at Plant A has to be followed for Plant B also).
One option that can be considered is to check at the Storage Location MRP Area level (there seems to be better support for RBA and Storage Location MRP Area than just storage location). See SAP Note 412314. But this is also complicated.
Another option is to not check at the storage location level but represent the various stocks with stock types (stock type ROD and stock type AFS) and only the stock type AFS will be used in the list of ATP categories.
Please share any experience that you may have in this.
Thanks,

Hi Satish,
In my project also we had this requirement to determine the correct Storage location after plant has been determined by using rules.
What we did is as follows:
- We created a Z table which had entries for all plants and preferred storage locations for those plant (only one entry per plant) in your case it will be like:
Plant A - AFC
Plant B - AFC
Plant C - AFC
- We used a ATP user exit in APO to get the storage location of source plant ( which was determined in APO via rules) from the Z table.
I hope this helps.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Anupam
Edited by: Anupam Sengar on Dec 20, 2011 12:03 AM

Storage Location Level ATP check through CRM

Hi:
I am on an implemenation where the integration is between CRM, EWM and GATP. So, consider the situation where the sales order check is done through CRM and a call to GATP is made.
Some background on supply
EWM would like to receive the goods into storage location ROD (Received On Dock) and then do a movement type to move it to storage location AFS (Available For Sale). The sales orders should consider only the supply from storage location AFS and not ROD.
First question is, is it possible to do a storage location level determination in CRM? I don't think so but wanted to confirm. The reason is because even a plant determination is not possible in CRM when you integrate with GATP (the plant is determined through Rules).
Now, suppose that we have determined the storage location called AFS (in gATP through enhancement) and will do an ATP only at that level in GATP. Suppose that the first plant that will be checked is Plant A and then based on the location determination procedure, the next plant that will be checked is Plant B. When the system checks supply at Plant B, then the question is this: will it still check only at storage location AFS in Plant B or will it check at the plant level? The requirement will be to check at the same storage location level (which means that whatever process we used to determine the storage location at Plant A has to be followed for Plant B also).
One option that can be considered is to check at the Storage Location MRP Area level (there seems to be better support for RBA and Storage Location MRP Area than just storage location). See SAP Note 412314. But this is also complicated.
Another option is to not check at the storage location level but represent the various stocks with stock types (stock type ROD and stock type AFS) and only the stock type AFS will be used in the list of ATP categories.
Please share any experience that you may have in this.
Thanks,
Satish

Hi Satish,
In my project also we had this requirement to determine the correct Storage location after plant has been determined by using rules.
What we did is as follows:
- We created a Z table which had entries for all plants and preferred storage locations for those plant (only one entry per plant) in your case it will be like:
Plant A - AFC
Plant B - AFC
Plant C - AFC
- We used a ATP user exit in APO to get the storage location of source plant ( which was determined in APO via rules) from the Z table.
I hope this helps.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Anupam
Edited by: Anupam Sengar on Dec 20, 2011 12:03 AM

Re: ATP check at storage location level.

Hi All,
NEED urgent help.
I want to know if it is posiible to have ATP check at storage location level only.
I do not want this check to happen at plant level.
Please reply.
Thanks and regards,
Nilesh

Hi Shankar,
Storage location is defaulted in sales order.
Can you tell me if there is any user exit for ATP wherein I can carry out the ATP at storage location level and not at plant level.
Thanks and regards,
Nilesh

Storage Location Control and ATP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for