PO Conditions not flowing in MIRO

Hi,
This is a case of Import Purchasing where Invoice Verification (for Custom/CVD) is done before goods receipt.
It is observed that in the screen MIRO the condition values (for duties of Custom/CVD) are not flowing from PO although values are maintained in PO. Amount and quantity need to be entered manually in MIRO in this case.
Is this a standard behaviour of SAP that if IV is done before GR then condition value doesn't flow from PO and need to be entered manually in MIRO? And is there any way out / work around in order to get the condition values flown from PO to MIRO if IV is done before GR?
Can any one assist in getting this query resolved?
Thanks in advance

yes, this is the standard behaviour. In import procurement we need to enter manually the value of conditions.
    No, there is no any customization through which we can get the flow of value automatically.
But, u can drag the value and qty of conditions---
           when u will do IV against the layout of PLANNED DELIVERY COST, there u will find the right side two columns Recieved QTy and Value. from that columns, u can drag the value and qty.
thanks

Similar Messages

  • ADC for Domestic Purchase not flowing in MIRO for particular MIGO Document

    Hello Experts,
        We've a scenario in which we pay ADC to domestic vendor. The procedure we follow is as below:
              1. Condition record for JAOP with 0% rate maintained in FV12.
              2. PO created with JMOP 10%, 2% ECS, 1% SECS & 4% VAT.
              3. During MIGO (also excise invoice capture), AED value is maintained
              4. After J1IEX, at the time of MIRO this ADC along with other duties flows in simulation
        Now in my case, there are number of GR documents for which MIRO is performed, but for particular GR, ADC is not flowing in MIRO and also excise duty is incorrect, it's not flowing from GR.
       So what is the probable solution for this, I've already checked MIGO & excise invoice documents & found to be ok.
    Thanks in advance
            Amit

    Hi,
    Have you maintained material price including AED price??
    If yes then check whether you have maintained JAX1-100% or not?
    I think this should be treated as a dealer purchase as you are maintaining 0% amount for JAOP.
    Regards,
    Piyush

  • Correct values not flowing in MIRO when values are changed in J1IEX

    D/ Friends,
    In Purchase Scenario with mov typ 101, when we capture excise duty thru T.Code J1IEX, sometimes we need to change the Duty Rates as well as Excise base Value (i.e.***. Value). We change these 2 things & we also change the BED, ECess & SH Cess values manually. Thereafter we do GRN & then post the EI.
    Now the issue is that when we do MIRO, the duties Posted in EI in J1IEX, are not flowing in MIRO. Pls note that such scenario is occurring only when we change the above 2 things in J1IEX. Pls advice.
    Rgds.

    pl check excise defalt for your tax procedure  JCV1  condition assigned  or  not.
    regards
    karthik

  • Baseline date not flowing in MIRO transaction

    Hi
    Baseline date not flowing in MIRO while doing transaction.
    We have maintained Payment terms in vendor master record
    and payment terms maintained in PO also.
    We have done the GR posting.
    please help
    Thanks and regards
    Aakash

    Are you use an MIRO with amount split? and does your payment term is configured with "No Default Date'? Then refer to OSS 495303.

  • Service Tax condition not picking during MIRO

    Hi,
    Referring earlier posted thread,
    http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2135441&tstart=0
    I want to know insert a Tax Code - VAT for 10% and a Condition Type - Service Tax for 10.3%...
    During MIRO, Service Tax Amount is not Picking... Why???
    There is any solution for it.....

    Hi,
    If we create Service condition type, then why need to create Tax code in FTXP and maintain in FV11...
    Why both things need to create...??
    No need to maintain
    check for your service tax condition type
    Cond. class   A Discount or
    Calculat.type A percentage
    Cond.category B Delivery co
    and you have accrual tick for your condition in t-code M/06
    also check in your pricing procedure you have assign account key and accrual key for your condition type in t-code
    M/08
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Freight condition not appear in MIRO

    Hi,
    The freight condition is shown under PO - Item - Condition,however when try to do MIRO,it was not shown there.
    Anyone know the reason?
    Thanks.

    Hello,
    IN MIRO  --Select layout Goods receipt/services+Planned delivery cost.
    Or check is there any Differrent Vendor is there for freight , In PO select the freight Condition type and click on PO condition detail tab... you will get who is the Freight vendor.
    If this is situation then Go and select the MIRO wrt Vendor and Click on More allocation tab then give here planned delivery cost you will get the Frieght in MIRO.
    Mahesh Naik

  • STO Conditions not flowing to Billing

    Hai,
    I havec created STO-ME21N, & VL10B
    VF01-
    doc type:JEX maintained Copy controls & at item level - Price source- A=Pruchase order. NLN item cat.
    still conditions from STO to Billing doc_VF01
    can anyone have any idea?

    I have done all those- basic settings.
    able to create delivery (NL- Intracompany STO)
    n billing- VF01
    billing rel- A delivery related billing-
    I have to create Commercial billing, bcoz receiving plant settles the invoice to issuing plant.

  • Changed JAOQ values not flowing from J1IEX to MIRO

    Dear CIN experts,
    We are having Dealers excise invoice capturing scenario in our implementation.
    Here, we are capturing ADC for imported scrap at the time of posting J1IEX, which is not known at the time of punching PO. a nominal value has been maintained using JAOQ condition type.
    While posting J1IEX, the actual excise values (BED, ECESS and SECESS) as in Traders excise invoice is captured including ADC.
    All the values except AED (captured ADC) is flowing from J1IEX to MIRO, where as AED (JMOQ) is being picked up from Purchase order.
    But this is not the case if JAOP is used to capture ADC in tax procedure. the changed AED value in J1IEX is flowing to MIRO.
    Is this SAP standard behavior or is that SAP has not tested these scenarios?
    kindly help to solve the issue.
    Thanks in advance.
    Ashwin..

    Hi Shankar,
    Thanks for the reply.
    well, AED is almost non existent now. at least not in the scenario i have explained. this is about procurement of Metal Scrap. so the SAD that the import vendor has taken credit of is transferred to us through a dealer.
    with JAOP, i can increase or decrease the value of AED mentioned in PO. but this is not happening with JAOQ (value condition).
    With JAOQ, the value flows from PO, with JAOP, the value flows from J1IEX.
    please let me know, if you require any more clarification on the above scenario.
    Thanks again for the help
    Ashwin.

  • Migo reference document not appearing in miro for frieght conditions

    Dear all,
    I ahve done migo for a po and i have checked GR based invoice in PO.When i am doing MIRO i am not getting the migo reference number for frieght condition where as the migo reference number is appearing for base price.How to get that migo reference number for frieght conditions also.
    thanks in advance
    regards
    vithal

    Sometimes the the MIGO creator might have reversed the same. In such cases the reversal document may be with different number in the same series and both posted & reversed documents will not appear in MIRO. Since you might checking with posted document number, you are seeing the blank in MIRO. In such cases, just enter the PO number in MIRO, give date & reference number press Show PO structure button in the left corner. You will find the following screen
    Expand the required once. The following screen appears. In this both positive & negative numbers with same reference & document type appearing are the reversed documents.
    Hope this is clear

  • Condition VPRS not flowing to CO-PA

    Hi Experts,
    I configured condition VPRS in KE4I as I want Cost of Goods Sold to be transferred to CO-PA, and this information is availabe in a statistical condition in Billing Documents (we are implementing account based CO-PA).
    During my simulations in KE4ST, the values for condition VPRS are not appearing in "Valuation Tab", only the values for Revenue and Tax conditions are appearing.
    Our client has the COGS account created as cost element category 12.
    Can you help me? Is there other configuration needed to flow values from VPRS to CO-PA?
    Is the cost element cat 12 a problem when I want to derive COGS from VPRS?
    I will not map this cost element in OKB9 for PA segment.
    Kind Regards
    Mayumi

    I've checked in KEKF and it is active. This has been active before the addition of the new value field as well. Nothing has changed.
    The transfer of values is based on sales and billing document. This is how it has been since we went live. So it is driven by the condition type and value field mappings in KE4I.
    But the sales order details are not flowing to co-pa. My suspicion is that might have to do with the Material Cost estimates in test environment.
    Please let me know if you have any other pointers.

  • While doinh Miro Cenvat clearing excise not flowing.

    Dear all ,,
    we have one po in that we maintained same material with qty 10.we maintained J1ID for that material.
    we have received migo two times first time 5 qty and second time 5 qty we have updated part1 and part2 also posted,
    we received two excise invoice and updated part2 also .
    ANd we have received two good invoice ,while miro for first invoice excise is coming in Cenvat clearing ,,
    But for second invoice excise is not flowing to CENVAT CLEARING,,
    Kidly suggest me what may be the reason .
    Thnaks in advance
    Thanks and Regards
    Girish.

    Dear all...
    any suggestion,,

  • SERVICE ORDER COST IS NOT FLOWING TO CONDITION TYPE EK01 IN SALES ORDER

    hi all,
    My requirement is that the cost incurred in service order should flow to the condition type ek01.
    we will be running the transaction dp90 to calculate the cost for the resources used.
    the cost are getting calculated at service order level but this cost are not flowing to the billing item being generated from dp90 in the billing request.
    the settings that i have made are as follows: I have maintained the condition type ek01in the sales pricing procedure. are there any other settings required by me to make.
    valuable answers will be be rewarded fullpoints.
    regards,
    ashish

    Hi prince
    Check out in Control data of Condition Type--PB00..Enter "NO Limitations" in Manual Entries. and check the 'Amout' and 'Value' and 'Delete' so that u can make changes to that condition type in line item in sales order.

  • %age entered in the Info record condition type is not flowing to the PO

    Dear SAP Experts,
    I have created a condition type ZCV1 by copying the condition type JCV1. But, if I enter the percentage in the JCV1 in the Info Record, it flows to PO, but, the percentage entered for ZCV1 in the inforecord is not flowing to the Purchase Order.
    Request to provide solution for the above problem.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Muthuraman.K

    Sorry , Double Post

  • Cutoms miro - value not  flowing

    Hi,
    When i'm doing miro for customs vendor, the values (cvd, ed, se cess) which we mentioned in the po its not flowing into values column in miro??? pls suggest how to correct it ?

    hi
    u cant get values in MIRO for customs as the GR has not been yet done
    u have to feed them manually only
    u can find the value for each line item at right side of the line item (scroll at right )
    hope it clears
    regards
    kunal

  • PO Condition value not flowing to GR

    Hello Sir,
    We have a custom PO COndition Type and Account Key for one of the costs on a material. Recently we had few examples, where the value in PO for that condition type is flowing, but the value is not flowing during GR.
    Any pointers on how i should check this
    Thanks
    Balla

    Hi,
    You have a Condition Type &  Account Key assigned in ( just cross check in M/08 t.code). Now check following options
    Option-1:
    Did that  Account Key assigned to G/L account in OBYC with chart of account.
    Option-2:
    Check MR selected in filed RefApplicatio ( Reference application)in master data segment in  that Condition Type in M/06 t.code
    Option-3:
    Check Condition type selected(Invlistcond) for  internal costing in control data -2 in M/06 t.code
    Regards,
    Biju K

Maybe you are looking for